S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________
8500--A
2025-2026 Regular Sessions
I N S E N A T E
September 10, 2025
___________
Introduced by Sens. MYRIE, FAHY, FERNANDEZ, GIANARIS, GONZALEZ,
GOUNARDES, HINCHEY, HOYLMAN-SIGAL, KAVANAGH, LIU, MAY, MAYER, RAMOS,
RIVERA, C. RYAN, SALAZAR, SANDERS, STAVISKY, WEBB -- read twice and
ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on
Rules -- committee discharged, bill amended, ordered reprinted as
amended and recommitted to said committee
AN ACT to amend the civil rights law, in relation to enacting the New
York Civil Rights Act
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. This act shall be known and may be cited as the "New York
Civil Rights Act".
§ 2. The civil rights law is amended by adding a new article 8-A to
read as follows:
ARTICLE 8-A
THE NEW YORK CIVIL RIGHTS ACT
SECTION 85. ACTION FOR DEPRIVATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS.
§ 85. ACTION FOR DEPRIVATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS. 1. LEGISLATIVE
INTENT. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK MUST BE GUARANTEED MEANING-
FUL REMEDIES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THOSE PROVIDED THROUGH THE
COURTS, WHEN THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS ARE VIOLATED. RECENT UNITED
STATES SUPREME COURT DECISIONS HAVE CURTAILED THE AVAILABILITY OF SUCH
REMEDIES UNDER BIVENS V. SIX UNKNOWN NAMED AGENTS, REPEATEDLY DECLINING
TO EXTEND DAMAGES ACTIONS TO NEW CONTEXTS AND LEAVING MANY VICTIMS OF
CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATIONS WITHOUT RECOURSE. CONCURRENTLY, THE FEDERAL
TORT CLAIMS ACT (FTCA), AS AMENDED BY THE WESTFALL ACT, PROVIDES THE
EXCLUSIVE AVENUE FOR MANY COMMON-LAW DAMAGES ACTIONS AGAINST FEDERAL
OFFICERS ACTING WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THEIR EMPLOYMENT. THESE DEVELOPMENTS
HAVE CREATED A SIGNIFICANT REMEDIAL VOID FOR NEW YORKERS INJURED BY
UNCONSTITUTIONAL CONDUCT.
EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD13560-10-5
S. 8500--A 2
THEREFORE, THE LEGISLATURE FINDS IT NECESSARY TO PROVIDE AN AVENUE FOR
CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES AGAINST ANY FEDERAL, STATE, OR LOCAL OFFICIAL, WHO,
ACTING UNDER COLOR OF ANY FEDERAL, STATE, OR LOCAL LAW, DEPRIVES A
PERSON OF RIGHTS SECURED BY THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION. THE WEST-
FALL ACT EXPLICITLY CARVES OUT FROM THE FTCA'S EXCLUSIVE PURVIEW "A
CIVIL ACTION AGAINST AN EMPLOYEE OF THE GOVERNMENT WHICH IS BROUGHT FOR
A VIOLATION OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES." 28 U.S.C. §
2679(B)(2)(A). THE PLAIN TEXT OF THIS PROVISION CONTAINS NO LIMITATION
ON THE SCOPE OF CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATIONS CARVED OUT FROM THE FTCA'S
EXCLUSIVE PURVIEW, RECOGNIZING THE WELL-ESTABLISHED PRINCIPLE THAT
GOVERNMENT AGENTS ACT OUTSIDE OF THE SCOPE OF THEIR OFFICES WHEN THEY
VIOLATE THE CONSTITUTION. THE LEGISLATURE INTENDS FOR THIS STATUTE TO
FALL SQUARELY WITHIN THAT PROVISION.
THIS ARTICLE DOES NOT, NOR IS INTENDED TO, USURP FEDERAL AUTHORITY.
NOR DOES IT DISCRIMINATE AGAINST FEDERAL OFFICIALS. THIS STATUTE UNDER-
SCORES THE SUPREMACY OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION BY ENSURING THAT ITS
GUARANTEES REMAIN ENFORCEABLE FOR ALL NEW YORKERS AGAINST ALL PERSONS
ACTING UNDER COLOR OF ANY LAW. FROM THE FOUNDING ERA THROUGH THE NINE-
TEENTH CENTURY, COURTS REGULARLY ENTERTAINED STATE LAW SUITS AGAINST
FEDERAL OFFICERS WHO EXCEEDED LAWFUL AUTHORITY. NOTHING IN THE CONSTITU-
TION, FEDERAL STATUTES, OR UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT PRECEDENT FORE-
CLOSES SUCH ACTIONS TODAY. THE LEGISLATURE THUS FINDS THAT NEW YORK
STATE MAY PROPERLY ACT TO SAFEGUARD ITS RESIDENTS' CONSTITUTIONAL
RIGHTS.
THE INTENT OF THIS STATUTE IS TO RESTORE A MEANINGFUL AVENUE OF
ACCOUNTABILITY CONSISTENT WITH FEDERAL SUPREMACY, SOVEREIGNTY, AND THE
LONG-STANDING PRINCIPLE THAT RIGHTS MUST BE PAIRED WITH REMEDIES.
2. DEFINITION. AS USED IN THIS SECTION, "COLOR OF ANY LAW, STATUTE,
ORDINANCE, REGULATION, CUSTOM, OR USAGE" INCLUDES COLOR OF ANY STATUTE,
ORDINANCE, REGULATION, CUSTOM, OR USAGE, OF THE UNITED STATES AND OF ANY
STATE OR TERRITORY OR DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.
3. LIABILITY. ANY PERSON WHO, UNDER COLOR OF ANY LAW, STATUTE, ORDI-
NANCE, REGULATION, CUSTOM, OR USAGE, SUBJECTS, OR CAUSES TO BE
SUBJECTED, ANY CITIZEN OF THE UNITED STATES OR OTHER PERSON WITHIN THE
JURISDICTION THEREOF TO THE DEPRIVATION OF ANY RIGHTS, PRIVILEGES, OR
IMMUNITIES SECURED BY THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES, SHALL BE
LIABLE TO THE PARTY INJURED IN AN ACTION AT LAW, SUIT IN EQUITY, OR
OTHER PROPER PROCEEDING FOR REDRESS, EXCEPT THAT IN ANY ACTION BROUGHT
AGAINST A JUDICIAL OFFICER FOR AN ACT OR OMISSION TAKEN IN SUCH OFFI-
CER'S JUDICIAL CAPACITY, INJUNCTIVE RELIEF SHALL NOT BE GRANTED UNLESS
DECLARATORY DECREE WAS VIOLATED OR DECLARATORY RELIEF WAS UNAVAILABLE.
4. IMMUNITY DEFENSES. (A) OFFICIAL IMMUNITY. A DEFENDANT IN AN ACTION
UNDER THIS SECTION MAY ASSERT A DEFENSE OF ABSOLUTE OR QUALIFIED IMMUNI-
TY TO THE SAME EXTENT AS A PERSON SUED UNDER 42 U.S.C. 1983 UNDER LIKE
CIRCUMSTANCES.
(B) SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY. NOTHING IN THIS SECTION SHALL BE CONSTRUED TO
WAIVE OR ABROGATE ANY DEFENSE OR SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY OTHERWISE AVAILABLE
TO A PARTY.
5. REMEDIES. IN ANY ACTION BROUGHT UNDER THIS SECTION, THE COURT MAY
AWARD:
(A) COMPENSATORY DAMAGES, INCLUDING DAMAGES FOR EMOTIONAL DISTRESS,
PAIN AND SUFFERING, AND OTHER NON-ECONOMIC DAMAGES;
(B) PUNITIVE DAMAGES WHERE THE VIOLATION IS FOUND TO BE MALICIOUS,
WANTON, WILLFUL, OR IN RECKLESS DISREGARD OF THE PLAINTIFF'S RIGHTS;
(C) INJUNCTIVE AND DECLARATORY RELIEF;
S. 8500--A 3
(D) REASONABLE ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS TO A PREVAILING PLAINTIFF;
AND
(E) EXPERT FEES AS PART OF THE REASONABLE ATTORNEYS' FEES.
6. SEVERABILITY. IF ANY PROVISION OF THIS SECTION OR THE APPLICATION
OF THE PERSON OR CIRCUMSTANCE IS HELD INVALID, THE REMAINDER OF THIS
SECTION AND THE APPLICATION OF THE PROVISION TO ANY OTHER PERSON OR
CIRCUMSTANCE SHALL NOT BE AFFECTED BY THAT INVALIDATION.
§ 3. This act shall take effect immediately.