senate Bill S3593A

2011-2012 Legislative Session

Requires medical proof in no-fault actions

download bill text pdf

Sponsored By

Archive: Last Bill Status - In Committee


  • Introduced
  • In Committee
  • On Floor Calendar
    • Passed Senate
    • Passed Assembly
  • Delivered to Governor
  • Signed/Vetoed by Governor

do you support this bill?

Actions

view actions (4)
Assembly Actions - Lowercase
Senate Actions - UPPERCASE
Jan 19, 2012 print number 3593a
amend and recommit to insurance
Jan 04, 2012 referred to insurance
Feb 28, 2011 referred to insurance

Bill Amendments

Original
A (Active)
Original
A (Active)

S3593 - Bill Details

Current Committee:
Law Section:
Insurance Law
Laws Affected:
Add §5110, Ins L
Versions Introduced in 2009-2010 Legislative Session:
S8246

S3593 - Bill Texts

view summary

Requires medical proof in no-fault actions.

view sponsor memo
BILL NUMBER:S3593

TITLE OF BILL:

An act
to amend the insurance law, in relation to medical proof in no-fault
actions, and provides for the repeal of such provisions
upon expiration thereof

PURPOSE:

This bill expedites the efficiency in which No-Fault cases are handled
by the New York City Civil Court system. This bill will allow the New
York City Civil Court system to try four times as many legitimate
cases by relaxing the rules of evidence and therefore relieving the
dockets.

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS:

Section 1: Medical proof in no-fault actions. A party who initiates an
action which seeks reimbursement for medical treatment, testing, or
supplies pursuant to section 5106 of the insurance law, shall at
trial, submit the sworn statement of the licensed medical
professional that rendered, prescribed or ordered the medical
treatment on the issue(s) of medical necessity or a sworn statement
from a representative that the claimed services had been billed in
accordance with the workers compensation fee schedule pursuant to
section 5108 of the insurance law.

The licensed medical professional shall affirm that no-fault benefits
were duly assigned to the plaintiff, the claimed treatment, testing
or supplies were rendered, prescribed or ordered by the plaintiff,
medically necessary to treat accident related injuries and shall
include the material facts and documents upon which the opinion of
medical necessity was based; or, the representative shall include the
relevant sections of the fee schedule and the material facts and
documents that support the claimed services were billed in accordance
with the fee schedule. Submission of such sworn statement does not
create a presumption of medical necessity or provide greater
deference to the treating medical professional or adherence to the
fee schedule.

A party opposing said action may submit a sworn statement on the
issue(s) of medical necessity or that the claimed services were not
billed in accordance with the workers compensation fee schedule
pursuant to section 5108 of the insurance law. Such statement shall
include the material facts and/or documents upon which that opinion
was based.

A copy of the sworn statement(s) shall be furnished to all parties no
later than the time the statement is submitted to the court. The
sworn statement shall be accepted by the court in lieu of testimony
unless, after submission of the sworn statement, the court determines
that it wishes to
hear testimony wherein the court shall then direct that all parties


submitting a sworn statement shall have that person appear and
testify in person.

This act shall take effect immediately and shall apply to all actions
and proceedings commenced on or after such date and shall also apply
to any action or proceeding which was commenced prior to such
effective date where, as of such date, either (a) a trial of the
issues has not yet commenced, or (b) the parties have not yet entered
into a stipulation of settlement. This act shall expire December 31,
2016.

EXISTING LAW:
Current law and practice, when defending at trial, the No-Fault
insurer must produce an expert to testify as to the basis for denying
payment of medical and other health-related bills.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY:
2010: S.8246 - Held in Rules

JUSTIFICATION:
Under the current law, when defending at trial, the No-Fault insurer
must produce an expert to testify as to the basis for denying payment
of medical and other health-related bills. There are not enough
resources for all the No-Fault medical provider cases to be heard in
a venue on the scheduled trial date.

During the last two years civil filings have increased by 25% in the
New York City Civil Courts. By October of 2009 alone, there were over
225,000 No-Fault medical provider claims filed in the NYC Civil Court
and it is projected by the end of 2009 there will be 257,000 cases
filed. These No-Fault cases only involve the insurance carriers and
the medical providers. The NYC Civil Court is where individual
litigants go to resolve their everyday civil legal problems.
Whether you are a local merchant, a consumer, a debtor, or a creditor,
the Civil Court is where you go to have a legal matter resolved.
Unfortunately, since the No-Fault cases account for at least 41.1%
of the cases in the NYC Civil Court most of the court resources are
tied up in No-Fault matters. The cases for the individual litigants
will be heard quicker and more efficiently when this proposed bill is
passed.

The court's resources are currently funneled into the No-Fault Civil
Courtrooms in an attempt to manage the daily dockets. The NYC Civil
Court's workload has more than doubled since 2001 and will only
continue to grow as a result of the mounting No-Fault cases.

In 2008 approximately $18,677,383 of the $54,529,232 NYC Civil Court
budget was allocated to the ever growing No-Fault cases. The NYC
Civil Court 2007-2008 budget request stated that the "civil caseload
increased dramatically in recent years, with over 150,000 No-Fault
insurance claims a major contributor... the request also includes
$500,000 to support judicial hearing officers, some of whom are
dedicated to handling the over 150,000 No-Fault insurance cases which
account for the largest component of the workload."

To manage the Court's No-Fault caseload in 2009 the amount allocated
was approximately $23,765,958 of the $57,824,715 NYC Civil Court


budget. The 2008-2009 NYC
Civil Court budget request stated that the budget increase was due to
the No-Fault cases. "The most dramatic workload increase in City and
District Courts has occurred in the Civil Court due to the growth in
no-fault cases...in the past year, the civil workload grew by 28
percent and has more than doubled since 2001. To assist in managing
this voluminous caseload, additional staffing was provided in 2006
through relaxation of hiring controls. Also, the 2008-09 request
continues the use of judicial hearing officers and back-office
overtime."

The Judiciary budget request continues to include the need for
increases in staff and overtime to assist in managing the
unprecedented growth in the No-Fault medical provider caseload every
year. The 2009-2010 NYC Civil Court Budget Request states that "civil
caseload has increased dramatically in recent years; in the past two
years alone, civil filings increased by 24% statewide and by 25% in
New York City Civil Court. No-fault insurance claims are a major
contributor to this growth.. .The growth of no-fault cases is most
evident in the New York City Civil Court, which receives over 225,000
no-fault filings a year."

The influx of the Personal Injury Protection (No-Fault) suits is
hindering the NYC Civil Courts' efforts to adjudicate the suits on
their individual merits. During today's cost cutting economic
environment, deserving courts such as the Family Courts which serve
the neediest in society lose resources to the NYC Civil Courts'
No-Fault caseloads.

New York State's courts are closing 2009 with 4.7 million cases, the
highest tally ever according to the December 28, 2009 New York Times
article The Recession Begins Flooding Into the Courts. The court
dockets are overloaded and people are seeing more and more delays in
their cases. Even though the number of cases continues to rise the
courts are being forced to do a lot more with a lot less.

By the end of 2009 the NYC Civil Court No-Fault medical provider cases
will cost $23,777,640 for the Court to maintain and New York
insurance to defend with witnesses.

The amendment would allow any party to an action for money, which
seeks reimbursement for medical treatment, services, supplies, or
testing pursuant to Article 51 of the insurance law to submit, at
trial, the sworn statement of a licensed medical professional on the
issue of the necessity of the medical treatment, services, supplies,
or testing. Such statement shall state the opinion of the medical
professional and the material facts upon which that opinion is based.
A copy of the sworn statement shall be furnished to all parties no
later than the time the statement is submitted to the court. The
sworn statement shall be accepted by the court in lieu of testimony
by the medical professional. The use of a sworn statement in lieu of
Jive testimony shall not give rise to any adverse inference
concerning the lack of live testimony of the licensed medical
professional.

The proposed bill will help save the courts millions of dollars by
eliminating the need for redundant court appearances, the filing of


unnecessary papers and briefs, and the delays caused by courthouse
backlogs and inefficiencies due to the numerous No-Fault cases.

This minor change to the rules of evidence in No-Fault matters will
allow the courts to adjudicate the cases on their merits while moving
the cases off the court's docket at four times the current pace.

The current state of extended adjournments, in every venue,
exacerbates the costs to maintain the Court's caseload to an
unbelievable level considering the number of No-Fault cases initiated
each year.

The resulting quicker pace will save the courts millions of dollars by
shortening the length of time the court must house a case and
therefore eliminate the need for increase of staff and overtime pay.

BUDGET IMPLICATIONS:

EFFECTIVE DATE:
This bill shall take effect immediately, with provisions.

view full text
download pdf
                    S T A T E   O F   N E W   Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________

                                  3593

                       2011-2012 Regular Sessions

                            I N  S E N A T E

                            February 28, 2011
                               ___________

Introduced  by  Sen.  ADAMS  -- read twice and ordered printed, and when
  printed to be committed to the Committee on Insurance

AN ACT to amend the insurance law,  in  relation  to  medical  proof  in
  no-fault  actions, and provides for the repeal of such provisions upon
  expiration thereof

  THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND  ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

  Section  1.  The insurance law is amended by adding a new section 5110
to read as follows:
  S 5110. MEDICAL PROOF IN NO-FAULT ACTIONS. 1. A PARTY WHO INITIATES AN
ACTION FOR MONEY, EXCLUSIVE OF INTEREST AND  COSTS  AND  ATTORNEY  FEES,
WHICH  SEEKS  REIMBURSEMENT  FOR MEDICAL TREATMENT, TESTING, OR SUPPLIES
PURSUANT TO SECTION FIVE THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED SIX OF THIS ARTICLE, SHALL
AT TRIAL, SUBMIT THE SWORN STATEMENT OF  THE  LICENSED  MEDICAL  PROFES-
SIONAL THAT RENDERED, PRESCRIBED OR ORDERED THE MEDICAL TREATMENT ON THE
ISSUE  OR ISSUES OF MEDICAL NECESSITY OR A SWORN STATEMENT FROM A REPRE-
SENTATIVE THAT CLAIMED SERVICES HAD BEEN BILLED IN ACCORDANCE  WITH  THE
WORKERS  COMPENSATION FEE SCHEDULE PURSUANT TO SECTION FIVE THOUSAND ONE
HUNDRED EIGHT OF THIS ARTICLE.
  2. THE LICENSED MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL SHALL AFFIRM THAT NO-FAULT  BENE-
FITS WERE DULY ASSIGNED TO THE PLAINTIFF, THE CLAIMED TREATMENT, TESTING
OR  SUPPLIES  WERE  RENDERED,  PRESCRIBED  OR  ORDERED BY THE PLAINTIFF,
MEDICALLY NECESSARY TO TREAT ACCIDENT RELATED INJURIES AND SHALL INCLUDE
THE MATERIAL FACTS AND DOCUMENTS  UPON  WHICH  THE  OPINION  OF  MEDICAL
NECESSITY  WAS  BASED; OR, THE REPRESENTATIVE SHALL INCLUDE THE RELEVANT
SECTIONS OF THE FEE SCHEDULE AND THE MATERIAL FACTS AND  DOCUMENTS  THAT
SUPPORT  THE  CLAIMED  SERVICES  WERE  BILLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FEE
SCHEDULE. SUBMISSION OF SUCH SWORN STATEMENT SHALL NOT CREATE A PRESUMP-
TION OF MEDICAL NECESSITY OR PROVIDE GREATER DEFERENCE TO  THE  TREATING
MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL OR ADHERENCE TO THE FEE SCHEDULE.

 EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                      [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                           LBD07585-01-1

S. 3593                             2

  3.  A  PARTY  OPPOSING SUCH ACTION MAY SUBMIT A SWORN STATEMENT ON THE
ISSUE OR ISSUES OF MEDICAL NECESSITY OR THAT THE CLAIMED  SERVICES  WERE
NOT  BILLED  IN  ACCORDANCE  WITH  THE WORKERS COMPENSATION FEE SCHEDULE
PURSUANT TO SECTION FIVE THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED  EIGHT  OF  THIS  ARTICLE.
SUCH  STATEMENT  SHALL  INCLUDE THE MATERIAL FACTS AND/OR DOCUMENTS UPON
WHICH SUCH STATEMENT IS BASED.
  4. A COPY OF THE SWORN STATEMENT OR STATEMENTS SHALL BE  FURNISHED  TO
ALL  PARTIES  NO  LATER THAN THE TIME THAT THE STATEMENT IS SUBMITTED TO
THE COURT. THE SWORN STATEMENT SHALL BE ACCEPTED BY THE COURT IN LIEU OF
TESTIMONY UNLESS, AFTER SUBMISSION OF THE  SWORN  STATEMENT,  THE  COURT
DETERMINES THAT IT WISHES TO HEAR TESTIMONY WHEREIN THE COURT SHALL THEN
DIRECT  THAT  ALL  PARTIES  SUBMITTING A SWORN STATEMENT SHALL HAVE THAT
PERSON APPEAR AND TESTIFY IN PERSON.
  S 2. This act shall take effect immediately and shall:
  1. apply to all actions and proceedings commenced  on  or  after  such
date;
  2. apply to any action or proceeding which was commenced prior to such
effective date where, as of such date, either: (a) a trial of the issues
has  not  yet  commenced, or (b) the parties have not yet entered into a
stipulation of settlement; and
  3. expire and be deemed repealed December 31, 2017.

S3593A (ACTIVE) - Bill Details

Current Committee:
Law Section:
Insurance Law
Laws Affected:
Add §5110, Ins L
Versions Introduced in 2009-2010 Legislative Session:
S8246

S3593A (ACTIVE) - Bill Texts

view summary

Requires medical proof in no-fault actions.

view sponsor memo
BILL NUMBER:S3593A

TITLE OF BILL:
An act
to amend the insurance law, in relation to medical proof in no-fault
actions, and provides for the repeal of such provisions
upon expiration thereof

PURPOSE:
This bill expedites the efficiency in which No-Fault cases are handled
by the New York City Civil Court system. This bill will allow the New
York City Civil Court system to try four times as many legitimate
cases by relaxing the rules of evidence and therefore relieving the
dockets.

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS:
Section 1: Medical proof in no-fault actions. A party who initiates an
action which seeks reimbursement for medical treatment, testing, or
supplies pursuant to section 5106 of the insurance law, shall at
trial, submit the sworn statement of the licensed medical
professional that rendered, prescribed or ordered the medical
treatment on the issue(s} of medical necessity or a sworn statement
from a representative that the claimed services had been billed in
accordance with the workers compensation fee schedule pursuant to
section 5108 of the insurance law.

The licensed medical professional shall affirm that no-fault benefits
were duly assigned to the plaintiff, the claimed treatment, testing
or supplies were rendered, prescribed or ordered by the plaintiff,
medically necessary to treat accident related injuries and shall
include the material facts and documents upon which the opinion of
medical necessity was based; or, the representative shall include the
relevant sections of the fee schedule and the material facts and
documents that support the claimed services were billed in accordance
with the fee schedule. Submission of such sworn statement does not
create a presumption of medical necessity or provide greater
deference to the treating medical professional or adherence to the
fee schedule.

A party opposing said action may submit a sworn statement on the
issue(s} of medical necessity or that the claimed services were not
billed in accordance with the workers compensation fee schedule
pursuant to section 5108 of the insurance law. Such statement shall
include the material facts and/or documents upon which that opinion
was based.

A copy of the sworn statement(s) shall be furnished to all parties no
later than the time the statement is submitted to the court. The sworn
statement shall be accepted by the court in lieu of testimony unless,
after submission of the sworn statement, the court determines that it
wishes to hear testimony wherein the court shall then direct that all
parties submitting a sworn statement shall have that person appear
and testify in person.

This act shall take effect immediately and shall apply to all actions
and proceedings commenced on or after such date and shall also apply


to any action or proceeding which was commenced prior to such
effective date where, as of such date, either (a) a trial of the
issues has not
yet commenced, or (b) the parties have not yet entered into a
stipulation of settlement. This act shall expire December 31, 2018.

EXISTING LAW:
Current law and practice, when defending at trial, the No-Fault
insurer must produce an expert to testify as to the basis for denying
payment of medical and other health-related bills.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY:
2010: S.8246 - Held in Rules

JUSTIFICATION:
Under the current law, when defending at trial, the No-Fault insurer
must produce an expert to testify as to the basis for denying payment
of medical and other health-related bills. There are not enough
resources for all the No-Fault medical provider cases to be heard in
a venue on the scheduled trial date.

During the last two years civil filings have increased by 25% in the
New York City Civil Courts. By October of 2009 alone, there were over
225,000 No-Fault medical provider claims filed in the NYC civil Court
and it is projected by the end of 2009 there will be 257,000 cases
filed. These No-Fault cases only involve the insurance carriers and
the medical providers. The NYC Civil Court is where individual
litigants go to resolve their everyday civil legal problems. Whether
you are a local merchant, a consumer, a debtor, or a creditor, the
Civil Court is where you go to have a legal matter resolved.
Unfortunately, since the No-Fault cases account for at least 41.1% of
the cases in the NYC Civil Court most of the court resources are tied
up in No-Fault matters. The cases for the individual litigants will
be heard quicker and more efficiently when this proposed bill is
passed.

The court's resources are currently funneled into the No-Fault Civil
Courtrooms in an attempt to manage the daily dockets. The NYC Civil
Court's workload has more than doubled since 2001 and will only
continue to grow as a result of the mounting No-Fault cases.

In 2008 approximately $18,677,383 of the $54,529,232 NYC Civil Court
budget was allocated to the ever growing No-Fault cases. The NYC
Civil Court 2007-2008 budget request stated that the "civil caseload
increased dramatically in recent years, with over 150,000 No-Fault
insurance claims a major contributor...the request also includes
$500,000 to
support judicial hearing officers, some of whom are dedicated to
handling the over 150,000 No-Fault insurance cases which account for
the largest component of the workload."

To manage the Court's No-Fault caseload in 2009 the amount allocated
was approximately $23,765,958 of the $57,824,715 NYC Civil Court
budget. The 2008-2009 NYC civil Court budget request stated that the
budget increase was due to the No-Fault cases. "The most dramatic
workload increase in City and District Courts has occurred in the
Civil Court due to the growth in no-fault cases...in the past year,


the civil workload grew by 28 percent and has more than doubled since
2001. To assist in managing this voluminous caseload, additional
staffing was provided in 2006 through relaxation of hiring controls.
Also, the 2008-09 request continues the use of judicial hearing
officers and back-office overtime."

The Judiciary budget request continues to include the need for
increases in staff and overtime to assist in managing the
unprecedented growth in the No-Fault medical provider caseload every
year. The 2009-2010 NYC Civil Court Budget Request states that "civil
caseload has increased dramatically in recent years; in the past two
years alone, civil filings increased by 24% statewide and by 25% in
New York city Civil court.
No-fault insurance claims are a major contributor to this growth..
e growth of no-fault cases is most evident in the New york city
Civil Court, which receives over 225,000 no-fault filings a year."

The influx of the personal Injury Protection (No-Fault) suits is
hindering the NYC Civil Courts' efforts to adjudicate the suits on
their individual merits. During today's cost cutting economic
environment, deserving courts such as the Family Courts which serve
the neediest in society lose resources to the NYC Civil Courts'
No-Fault caseloads.

New York state's courts are closing 2009 with 4.7 million cases, the
highest tally ever according to the December 28, 2009 New York Times
article The Recession Begins Flooding Into the Courts. The court
dockets are overloaded and people are seeing more and more delays in
their cases. Even though the number of cases continues to rise the
courts are being forced to do a lot more with a lot less.

By the end of 2009 the NYC Civil Court No-Fault medical provider cases
will cost $23,777,640 for the Court to maintain and New York
insurance to defend with witnesses.

The amendment would allow any party to an action for money, which
seeks reimbursement for medical treatment, services, supplies, or
testing pursuant to Article 51 of the insurance law to submit, at
trial, the sworn statement of a licensed medical professional on the
issue of the necessity of the medical treatment, services, supplies,
or testing. such statement shall state the opinion of the medical
professional and the material facts upon which that opinion is based.
A copy of the sworn statement shall be furnished to all parties no
later than the time the statement is submitted to the court. The
sworn statement shall be accepted by the court in lieu of testimony
by the medical professional.
The use of a sworn statement in lieu of live testimony shall not give
rise to any adverse inference concerning the lack of live testimony
of the licensed medical professional.

The proposed bill will help save the courts millions of dollars by
eliminating the need for redundant court appearances, the filing of
unnecessary papers and briefs, and the delays caused by courthouse
backlogs and inefficiencies due to the numerous No-Fault cases.


This minor change to the rules of evidence in No-Fault matters will
allow the courts to adjudicate the cases on their merits while moving
the cases off the court's docket at four times the current pace.

The current state of extended adjournments, in every venue,
exacerbates the costs to maintain the Court's caseload to an
unbelievable level considering the number of No-Fault cases initiated
each year.

The resulting quicker pace will save the courts millions of dollars by
shortening the length of time the court must house a case and
therefore eliminate the need for increase of staff and overtime pay.

BUDGET IMPLICATIONS:

EFFECTIVE DATE:
This bill shall take effect immediately, with provisions.

view full text
download pdf
                    S T A T E   O F   N E W   Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________

                                 3593--A

                       2011-2012 Regular Sessions

                            I N  S E N A T E

                            February 28, 2011
                               ___________

Introduced  by  Sen.  ADAMS  -- read twice and ordered printed, and when
  printed to be committed to the Committee on Insurance  --  recommitted
  to the Committee on Insurance in accordance with Senate Rule 6, sec. 8
  --  committee  discharged,  bill amended, ordered reprinted as amended
  and recommitted to said committee

AN ACT to amend the insurance law,  in  relation  to  medical  proof  in
  no-fault  actions, and provides for the repeal of such provisions upon
  expiration thereof

  THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND  ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

  Section  1.  The insurance law is amended by adding a new section 5110
to read as follows:
  S 5110. MEDICAL PROOF IN NO-FAULT ACTIONS. 1. A PARTY WHO INITIATES AN
ACTION FOR MONEY, EXCLUSIVE OF INTEREST AND  COSTS  AND  ATTORNEY  FEES,
WHICH  SEEKS  REIMBURSEMENT  FOR MEDICAL TREATMENT, TESTING, OR SUPPLIES
PURSUANT TO SECTION FIVE THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED SIX OF THIS ARTICLE, SHALL
AT TRIAL, SUBMIT THE SWORN STATEMENT OF  THE  LICENSED  MEDICAL  PROFES-
SIONAL THAT RENDERED, PRESCRIBED OR ORDERED THE MEDICAL TREATMENT ON THE
ISSUE  OR ISSUES OF MEDICAL NECESSITY OR A SWORN STATEMENT FROM A REPRE-
SENTATIVE THAT CLAIMED SERVICES HAD BEEN BILLED IN ACCORDANCE  WITH  THE
WORKERS  COMPENSATION FEE SCHEDULE PURSUANT TO SECTION FIVE THOUSAND ONE
HUNDRED EIGHT OF THIS ARTICLE.
  2. THE LICENSED MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL SHALL AFFIRM THAT NO-FAULT  BENE-
FITS WERE DULY ASSIGNED TO THE PLAINTIFF, THE CLAIMED TREATMENT, TESTING
OR  SUPPLIES  WERE  RENDERED,  PRESCRIBED  OR  ORDERED BY THE PLAINTIFF,
MEDICALLY NECESSARY TO TREAT ACCIDENT RELATED INJURIES AND SHALL INCLUDE
THE MATERIAL FACTS AND DOCUMENTS  UPON  WHICH  THE  OPINION  OF  MEDICAL
NECESSITY  WAS  BASED; OR, THE REPRESENTATIVE SHALL INCLUDE THE RELEVANT
SECTIONS OF THE FEE SCHEDULE AND THE MATERIAL FACTS AND  DOCUMENTS  THAT
SUPPORT  THE  CLAIMED  SERVICES  WERE  BILLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FEE
SCHEDULE. SUBMISSION OF SUCH SWORN STATEMENT SHALL NOT CREATE A PRESUMP-

 EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                      [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                           LBD07585-02-1

S. 3593--A                          2

TION OF MEDICAL NECESSITY OR PROVIDE GREATER DEFERENCE TO  THE  TREATING
MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL OR ADHERENCE TO THE FEE SCHEDULE.
  3.  A  PARTY  OPPOSING SUCH ACTION MAY SUBMIT A SWORN STATEMENT ON THE
ISSUE OR ISSUES OF MEDICAL NECESSITY OR THAT THE CLAIMED  SERVICES  WERE
NOT  BILLED  IN  ACCORDANCE  WITH  THE WORKERS COMPENSATION FEE SCHEDULE
PURSUANT TO SECTION FIVE THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED  EIGHT  OF  THIS  ARTICLE.
SUCH  STATEMENT  SHALL  INCLUDE THE MATERIAL FACTS AND/OR DOCUMENTS UPON
WHICH SUCH STATEMENT IS BASED.
  4. A COPY OF THE SWORN STATEMENT OR STATEMENTS SHALL BE  FURNISHED  TO
ALL  PARTIES  NO  LATER THAN THE TIME THAT THE STATEMENT IS SUBMITTED TO
THE COURT. THE SWORN STATEMENT SHALL BE ACCEPTED BY THE COURT IN LIEU OF
TESTIMONY UNLESS, AFTER SUBMISSION OF THE  SWORN  STATEMENT,  THE  COURT
DETERMINES THAT IT WISHES TO HEAR TESTIMONY WHEREIN THE COURT SHALL THEN
DIRECT  THAT  ALL  PARTIES  SUBMITTING A SWORN STATEMENT SHALL HAVE THAT
PERSON APPEAR AND TESTIFY IN PERSON.
  S 2. This act shall take effect immediately and shall:
  1. apply to all actions and proceedings commenced  on  or  after  such
date;
  2. apply to any action or proceeding which was commenced prior to such
effective date where, as of such date, either: (a) a trial of the issues
has  not  yet  commenced, or (b) the parties have not yet entered into a
stipulation of settlement; and
  3. expire and be deemed repealed December 31, 2018.

Comments

Open Legislation comments facilitate discussion of New York State legislation. All comments are subject to moderation. Comments deemed off-topic, commercial, campaign-related, self-promotional; or that contain profanity or hate speech; or that link to sites outside of the nysenate.gov domain are not permitted, and will not be published. Comment moderation is generally performed Monday through Friday.

By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and verify you are over 13.