S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________
3363
2015-2016 Regular Sessions
I N A S S E M B L Y
January 22, 2015
___________
Introduced by M. of A. PEOPLES-STOKES, SEPULVEDA, ROBERTS, O'DONNELL,
ROZIC -- Multi-Sponsored by -- M. of A. ARROYO, BRENNAN, CLARK,
FARRELL, HEVESI, McDONALD, MOSLEY -- read once and referred to the
Committee on Correction
AN ACT to amend the correction law and the executive law, in relation to
college admission for persons previously convicted of one or more
criminal offenses
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The correction law is amended by adding a new article 23-B
to read as follows:
ARTICLE 23-B
COLLEGE ADMISSIONS FOR PERSONS PREVIOUSLY CONVICTED
OF ONE OR MORE CRIMINAL OFFENSES
SECTION 770. DEFINITIONS.
771. LEGISLATIVE INTENT.
772. PROHIBITION AGAINST INQUIRIES ABOUT ARRESTS THAT DID NOT
RESULT IN A CRIMINAL CONVICTION AND CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS
THAT HAVE BEEN SEALED.
773. PRE-ACCEPTANCE PROHIBITION AGAINST INQUIRY INTO CRIMINAL
HISTORY.
774. POST-ACCEPTANCE INQUIRY ABOUT CRIMINAL HISTORY PERMITTED.
775. INQUIRIES INTO CRIMINAL HISTORY NOT REQUIRED.
776. ENFORCEMENT.
S 770. DEFINITIONS. 1. "COLLEGE" SHALL MEAN COLLEGES, UNIVERSITIES,
PROFESSIONAL AND TECHNICAL SCHOOLS AND OTHER INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER
EDUCATION AUTHORIZED TO CONFER DEGREES PURSUANT TO SUBDIVISIONS TWO,
THREE AND EIGHT OF SECTION TWO OF THE EDUCATION LAW.
2. "ADMISSIONS DECISION-MAKING PROCESS" SHALL MEAN SUBMISSION OF THE
APPLICATION AND ALL ASPECTS OF THE APPLICATION PROCESS THROUGH ADMIS-
SION.
EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD01680-01-5
A. 3363 2
3. "DIRECT RELATIONSHIP" MEANS THAT THERE IS A SUBSTANTIAL CONNECTION
BETWEEN THE NATURE OF THE CRIME FOR WHICH THE ACCEPTED INDIVIDUAL WAS
CONVICTED AND THE ACTIVITY OR ASPECT OF CAMPUS LIFE AT ISSUE AND SUCH
CONNECTION WOULD CREATE AN UNREASONABLE RISK TO THE PROPERTY OR TO THE
SAFETY OR WELFARE OF SPECIFIC INDIVIDUALS OR THE CAMPUS AS A WHOLE IF
THE ACCEPTED STUDENT IS PERMITTED TO PARTICIPATE WITH OR WITHOUT CONDI-
TIONS.
S 771. LEGISLATIVE INTENT. COLLEGE EDUCATION PLAYS A CRITICAL ROLE IN
DEVELOPING GOOD CITIZENSHIP, CREATING ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL OPPORTUNITIES,
AND ENHANCING PUBLIC SAFETY BY REDUCING THE RECIDIVISM OF INDIVIDUALS
WITH A CRIMINAL HISTORY RECORD. THEREFORE, IT IS THE PUBLIC POLICY OF
THIS STATE TO PROMOTE THE ADMISSION TO COLLEGE OF INDIVIDUALS PREVIOUSLY
CONVICTED OF ONE OR MORE CRIMINAL OFFENSES AND TO ALLOW SUCH INDIVIDUALS
TO FULLY PARTICIPATE IN ALL ASPECTS OF COLLEGE LIFE.
S 772. PROHIBITION AGAINST INQUIRIES ABOUT ARRESTS THAT DID NOT RESULT
IN A CRIMINAL CONVICTION AND CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS THAT HAVE BEEN SEALED.
AT NO TIME DURING THE ADMISSION DECISION-MAKING PROCESS OR WHILE A
STUDENT IS ENROLLED SHALL COLLEGES MAKE ANY INQUIRY OR CONSIDER INFORMA-
TION ABOUT ANY ARREST OR CRIMINAL ACCUSATION OF AN INDIVIDUAL WHO IS
APPLYING FOR ADMISSION OR HAS BEEN ADMITTED THAT WAS FOLLOWED BY A
TERMINATION OF THAT CRIMINAL ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN FAVOR OF SUCH INDI-
VIDUAL AS DEFINED IN SUBDIVISION TWO OF SECTION 160.50 OF THE CRIMINAL
PROCEDURE LAW AND SECTION 375.1 OF THE FAMILY COURT ACT, OR BY A YOUTH-
FUL OFFENDER ADJUDICATION AS DEFINED IN SUBDIVISION ONE OF SECTION
720.35 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW, OR BY A JUVENILE DELINQUENCY ADJU-
DICATION AS DEFINED IN SUBDIVISION ONE OF SECTION 380.1 OF THE FAMILY
COURT ACT, OR BY A CONVICTION FOR A VIOLATION SEALED OR SEALABLE PURSU-
ANT TO SECTION 160.55 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW, OR BY A CONVICTION
WHICH IS SEALED PURSUANT TO SECTION 160.58 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
LAW.
S 773. PRE-ACCEPTANCE PROHIBITION AGAINST INQUIRY INTO CRIMINAL HISTO-
RY. COLLEGES MAY NOT MAKE ANY INQUIRY OR CONSIDER INFORMATION ABOUT AN
INDIVIDUAL'S PAST CRIMINAL CONVICTION OR CONVICTIONS AT ANY TIME DURING
THE APPLICATION AND ADMISSIONS DECISION-MAKING PROCESS.
S 774. POST-ACCEPTANCE INQUIRY ABOUT CRIMINAL HISTORY PERMITTED. 1.
AFTER AN INDIVIDUAL HAS BEEN ADMITTED AS A STUDENT, COLLEGES MAY MAKE
INQUIRIES ABOUT AND CONSIDER INFORMATION ABOUT THE INDIVIDUAL'S PAST
CRIMINAL CONVICTION HISTORY FOR THE PURPOSE OF OFFERING SUPPORTIVE COUN-
SELING AND SERVICES.
2. COLLEGES MAY ALSO MAKE INQUIRIES ABOUT AND CONSIDER INFORMATION
ABOUT THE INDIVIDUAL'S PAST CRIMINAL CONVICTION HISTORY FOR THE PURPOSE
OF MAKING DECISIONS ABOUT PARTICIPATION IN ACTIVITIES AND ASPECTS OF
CAMPUS LIFE ASSOCIATED WITH THE INDIVIDUAL'S STATUS AS A STUDENT,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO HOUSING. IN MAKING SUCH INQUIRIES AND
CONSIDERING SUCH INFORMATION:
(A) COLLEGES SHALL NOT USE INFORMATION ABOUT AN ADMITTED INDIVIDUAL'S
CRIMINAL CONVICTION HISTORY TO RESCIND AN OFFER OF ADMISSION.
(B) COLLEGES SHALL NOT ESTABLISH OUTRIGHT BARS TO ANY ACTIVITIES OR
PARTICIPATION IN ASPECTS OF CAMPUS LIFE BASED ON AN ADMITTED INDIVID-
UAL'S CRIMINAL CONVICTION HISTORY. INSTEAD, COLLEGES MUST DEVELOP AN
INDIVIDUALIZED PROCESS FOR DETERMINING WHETHER OR NOT THERE IS A DIRECT
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE ACCEPTED INDIVIDUAL'S CRIMINAL CONVICTION
HISTORY AND THE ACTIVITY OR ASPECT OF CAMPUS LIFE AT ISSUE. THIS INDI-
VIDUALIZED PROCESS MUST BE SET FORTH IN WRITING AND MUST INCLUDE CONSID-
ERATION OF:
A. 3363 3
(I) THE AGE OF THE INDIVIDUAL AT THE TIME OF THE BEHAVIOR UNDERLYING
THE CRIMINAL CONVICTION OR CONVICTIONS;
(II) THE TIME THAT HAS ELAPSED SINCE THE BEHAVIOR UNDERLYING THE CRIM-
INAL CONVICTION OR CONVICTIONS;
(III) THE NATURE OF THE CONVICTION OR CONVICTIONS AND WHETHER IT BEARS
A DIRECT RELATIONSHIP TO THE ACTIVITY OR PARTICIPATION IN ASPECTS OF
CAMPUS LIFE AT ISSUE; AND
(IV) ANY EVIDENCE OF REHABILITATION OR GOOD CONDUCT PRODUCED BY THE
ACCEPTED INDIVIDUAL.
(C) THIS INDIVIDUALIZED PROCESS MUST FURTHER PROVIDE AN ACCEPTED INDI-
VIDUAL AN OPPORTUNITY TO APPEAL ANY DENIAL OR LIMITATION OF ACCESS TO
ANY ACTIVITY OR ASPECT OF CAMPUS LIFE. COLLEGES MUST FURTHER INFORM
ACCEPTED INDIVIDUALS OF THIS PROCESS IN WRITING, INCLUDING THEIR RIGHT
TO PROVIDE EVIDENCE OF REHABILITATION AND GOOD CONDUCT AND THEIR RIGHT
TO APPEAL.
S 775. INQUIRIES INTO CRIMINAL HISTORY NOT REQUIRED. THIS ARTICLE DOES
NOT REQUIRE COLLEGES TO MAKE INQUIRIES INTO OR CONSIDER AN INDIVIDUAL'S
CRIMINAL CONVICTION HISTORY FOR ANY REASON. IF COLLEGES ELECT TO DO SO
FOR THE PURPOSE OF DETERMINING IF THERE IS A DIRECT RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN
THE ACCEPTED INDIVIDUAL'S CONVICTION OR CONVICTIONS AND ACTIVITIES OR
PARTICIPATION IN ASPECTS OF CAMPUS LIFE, COLLEGES MUST CONSIDER THE
STATE'S POLICY TO PROMOTE THE ADMISSION TO COLLEGE OF INDIVIDUALS PREVI-
OUSLY CONVICTED OF ONE OR MORE CRIMINAL OFFENSES AND OF ALLOWING SUCH
INDIVIDUALS FULL ACCESS TO ALL ASPECTS OF COLLEGE LIFE.
S 776. ENFORCEMENT. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS SECTION SHALL BE AN
UNLAWFUL DISCRIMINATORY PRACTICE AS DEFINED IN SUBDIVISION TWENTY-TWO OF
SECTION TWO HUNDRED NINETY-SIX OF THE EXECUTIVE LAW.
S 2. Section 296 of the executive law is amended by adding a new
subdivision 22 to read as follows:
22. IT SHALL BE AN UNLAWFUL DISCRIMINATORY PRACTICE FOR ANY COLLEGE,
AS DEFINED IN SUBDIVISION ONE OF SECTION SEVEN HUNDRED SEVENTY OF THE
CORRECTION LAW, TO MAKE ANY INQUIRY INTO OR CONSIDER INFORMATION ABOUT
AN INDIVIDUAL'S PAST ARREST OR CONVICTION HISTORY AT ANY TIME DURING THE
APPLICATION AND ADMISSIONS DECISION-MAKING PROCESS OR TO RESCIND AN
OFFER OF ADMISSION BASED UPON INFORMATION ABOUT AN INDIVIDUAL'S ARREST
OR CONVICTION THAT OCCURRED PRIOR TO ADMISSION.
S 3. This act shall take effect immediately.