S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________
5085
2021-2022 Regular Sessions
I N A S S E M B L Y
February 10, 2021
___________
Introduced by M. of A. KELLES -- read once and referred to the Committee
on Election Law
AN ACT to amend the election law, in relation to establishing a ranked
choice voting method for certain local elections; and providing for
the repeal of such provisions upon expiration thereof
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Legislative findings. The current system of voting often
results in the election of a candidate that does not have the majority
support of the electorate when there are three or more candidates
running for an elective office. Further, where there are three or more
candidates for an elective office, voters often will not vote for their
preferred candidate to avoid "wasting" their vote on a "spoiler" candi-
date. Rather, they will vote against a candidate they dislike, by voting
for a leading candidate that they perceive as the lesser of two evils.
The result of the current system in multi-candidate races can be the
election of candidates that lack majority support.
The ranked choice voting method provides for the majority election for
elective offices. Ranked choice voting gives voters the option to rank
candidates according to the order of their choice. If no candidate
obtains a majority of first-choice votes, then the candidate receiving
the fewest first-choice votes is eliminated. Each vote cast for the
eliminated candidate shall be transferred to the candidate who was the
voter's next choice on the ballot. The process is continued until a
candidate receives a majority of votes.
There are several potential benefits to the ranked choice voting meth-
od. First, voters are free to mark their ballot for the candidate they
truly prefer without fear that their choice will help elect their least
preferred candidate. Second, it insures that the elected candidate has
true majority support. In addition, the ranked choice voting method will
(1) promote higher voter turnout, and (2) encourage positive campaign-
EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD04936-01-1
A. 5085 2
ing, since candidates will seek second-choice and third-choice votes
from voters and will therefore be less likely to attack other candidates
and alienate voters that support other candidates as their first choice.
In situations where runoffs are already required, it will eliminate the
need for a second runoff election, with its increased costs and lower
voter turnout.
The ranked choice voting method has been the subject of increasing
interest across the nation. It has already been adopted by local refer-
enda in California, Vermont, and Massachusetts. It is under consider-
ation in many other states.
It is the purpose of this act to permit the use of the ranked choice
voting method on a trial basis in certain local elections at the option
of local governments in the years 2024 and 2025. This pilot program
would permit the state legislature to evaluate the broader application
of the ranked choice voting method to elections in New York state.
§ 2. The election law is amended by adding a new article 18 to read as
follows:
ARTICLE 18
RANKED CHOICE VOTING METHOD
SECTION 18-100. DEFINITIONS.
18-102. RANKED CHOICE VOTING METHOD AUTHORIZED IN CERTAIN CASES.
18-104. RANKED CHOICE VOTING METHOD; BALLOTS.
18-106. RANKED CHOICE VOTING METHOD; PROCEDURES.
18-108. VOTER EDUCATION.
18-110. CONSTRUCTION.
§ 18-100. DEFINITIONS. 1. "RANKED CHOICE VOTING METHOD" SHALL MEAN A
METHOD OF CASTING AND TABULATING VOTES THAT SIMULATES THE BALLOT COUNTS
THAT WOULD OCCUR IF ALL VOTERS PARTICIPATED IN A SERIES OF RUNOFF
ELECTIONS, WHEREBY THE VOTERS RANK CANDIDATES ACCORDING TO THE ORDER OF
THEIR CHOICE AND, IF NO CANDIDATE HAS RECEIVED A MAJORITY OF VOTES CAST,
THEN THE CANDIDATE WITH THE FEWEST FIRST CHOICE VOTES IS ELIMINATED AND
THE REMAINING CANDIDATES ADVANCE TO ANOTHER COUNTING ROUND. IN EVERY
ROUND, EACH BALLOT IS COUNTED AS ONE VOTE FOR THE HIGHEST RANKED ADVANC-
ING CANDIDATE.
2. "LOCAL GOVERNMENT" SHALL MEAN A COUNTY, CITY, TOWN, VILLAGE, OR
SCHOOL DISTRICT.
§ 18-102. RANKED CHOICE VOTING METHOD AUTHORIZED IN CERTAIN CASES. 1.
FOR ELECTIONS TO BE HELD IN THE YEARS TWO THOUSAND TWENTY-FOUR AND TWO
THOUSAND TWENTY-FIVE, LOCAL GOVERNMENTS ARE HEREBY AUTHORIZED TO CONDUCT
ELECTIONS UTILIZING THE RANKED CHOICE VOTING METHOD FOR THE FOLLOWING
ELECTIONS: (A) MEMBER OF THE BOARD OF EDUCATION IN THE CASE OF A SCHOOL
DISTRICT, (B) COUNTY EXECUTIVE AND COUNTY LEGISLATOR IN THE CASE OF A
COUNTY, (C) MAYOR, MEMBER OF CITY COUNCIL, PUBLIC ADVOCATE, COMPTROLLER,
AND BOROUGH PRESIDENT, IN THE CASE OF A CITY, (D) TOWN SUPERVISOR AND
MEMBER OF TOWN COUNCIL IN THE CASE OF A TOWN, AND (E) MAYOR AND VILLAGE
TRUSTEE IN THE CASE OF A VILLAGE. "ELECTION" SHALL INCLUDE THE GENERAL
ELECTION AND PRIMARY, WHERE APPLICABLE.
2. IN ORDER TO IMPLEMENT THE RANKED CHOICE VOTING METHOD AS PROVIDED
IN SUBDIVISION ONE OF THIS SECTION, THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE LOCAL
GOVERNMENT SHALL ADOPT A RESOLUTION IMPLEMENTING THE RANKED CHOICE METH-
OD AS AUTHORIZED BY THIS ARTICLE. SUCH RESOLUTION SHALL BE SUBJECT TO A
PERMISSIVE REFERENDUM.
3. SUCH RESOLUTION SHALL BE ADOPTED BY THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE
LOCAL GOVERNMENT AT LEAST ONE HUNDRED EIGHTY DAYS BEFORE THE ELECTION
FOR WHICH RANKED CHOICE VOTING WILL BE UTILIZED.
A. 5085 3
4. THE PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS 18-104, 18-106, 18-108 AND 18-110 OF
THIS ARTICLE SHALL APPLY ONLY WHEN THREE OR MORE CANDIDATES HAVE BEEN
NOMINATED OR DESIGNATED FOR AN OFFICE ENUMERATED IN SUBDIVISION ONE OF
THIS SECTION, AND THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT HAS ENACTED
A RESOLUTION IMPLEMENTING THE RANKED CHOICE VOTING METHOD.
§ 18-104. RANKED CHOICE VOTING METHOD; BALLOTS. 1. FOR OFFICES SUBJECT
TO THE RANKED CHOICE VOTING METHOD, THE BALLOT SHALL BE SIMPLE AND EASY
TO UNDERSTAND AND ALLOW A VOTER TO RANK CANDIDATES FOR AN OFFICE IN
ORDER OF CHOICE. A VOTER MAY INCLUDE NO MORE THAN ONE WRITE-IN CANDIDATE
AMONG THAT VOTER'S RANKED CHOICES FOR EACH OFFICE. IF FEASIBLE, BALLOTS
SHALL BE DESIGNED SO THAT A VOTER MAY MARK THAT VOTER'S FIRST CHOICES IN
THE SAME MANNER AS THAT FOR OFFICES NOT ELECTED BY THE RANKED CHOICE
VOTING METHOD.
2. INSTRUCTIONS ON THE BALLOT SHALL CONFORM SUBSTANTIALLY TO THE
FOLLOWING SPECIFICATIONS, ALTHOUGH SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION, BASED ON
BALLOT DESIGN AND VOTING MACHINE:
"VOTE FOR CANDIDATES BY INDICATING YOUR FIRST-CHOICE CANDIDATES IN
ORDER OF PREFERENCE. INDICATE YOUR FIRST CHOICE BY MARKING THE NUMBER
"1" BESIDE A CANDIDATE'S NAME, YOUR SECOND CHOICE BY MARKING THE NUMBER
"2" BESIDE A CANDIDATE'S NAME, YOUR THIRD CHOICE BY MARKING THE NUMBER
"3" BESIDE A CANDIDATE'S NAME AND SO ON, FOR AS MANY CHOICES AS YOU
WISH. YOU MAY CHOOSE TO RANK ONLY ONE CANDIDATE, BUT RANKING ADDITIONAL
CANDIDATES WILL NOT HURT THE CHANCES OF YOUR FIRST-CHOICE CANDIDATE. DO
NOT MARK THE SAME NUMBER BESIDE MORE THAN ONE CANDIDATE. DO NOT SKIP
NUMBERS."
3. A SAMPLE BALLOT FOR AN OFFICE SUBJECT TO THE RANKED CHOICE VOTING
METHOD SHALL ILLUSTRATE THE VOTING PROCEDURE FOR THE RANKED CHOICE
VOTING METHOD. SUCH A SAMPLE BALLOT SHALL BE INCLUDED WITH EACH ABSENTEE
BALLOT.
4. THE APPROPRIATE ELECTION OFFICIAL FOR A LOCAL GOVERNMENT WHERE THE
RANKED CHOICE VOTING METHOD HAS BEEN AUTHORIZED BY SAID LOCAL GOVERNMENT
SHALL INSURE THAT THE NECESSARY VOTING SYSTEM, VOTE TABULATION SYSTEM,
OR OTHER SIMILAR OR RELATED EQUIPMENT SHALL BE AVAILABLE TO ACCOMMODATE
THE RANKED CHOICE VOTING METHOD.
§ 18-106. RANKED CHOICE VOTING METHOD; PROCEDURES. THE FOLLOWING
PROCEDURES SHALL APPLY IN DETERMINING THE WINNER IN AN ELECTION FOR AN
OFFICE SUBJECT TO THE RANKED CHOICE VOTING METHOD:
1. THE FIRST CHOICE MARKED ON EACH BALLOT SHALL BE COUNTED INITIALLY
BY ELECTION OFFICIALS. IF ONE CANDIDATE RECEIVES A MAJORITY OF THE VOTES
CAST, EXCLUDING BLANK AND VOID BALLOTS, THAT CANDIDATE SHALL BE DECLARED
ELECTED.
2. IF NO CANDIDATE RECEIVES A MAJORITY OF FIRST-CHOICE VOTES CAST AT
THE END OF THE INITIAL COUNT, THE CANDIDATE RECEIVING THE FEWEST FIRST-
CHOICE VOTES SHALL BE ELIMINATED. EACH VOTE CAST FOR THE ELIMINATED
CANDIDATE SHALL BE TRANSFERRED TO THE CANDIDATE WHO WAS THE VOTER'S NEXT
CHOICE ON THE BALLOT.
3. CANDIDATES WITH THE FEWEST VOTES SHALL CONTINUE TO BE ELIMINATED,
WITH THE VOTES FOR SUCH CANDIDATES TRANSFERRED TO THE CANDIDATE WHO WAS
EACH VOTER'S NEXT CHOICE ON THE BALLOT UNTIL A CANDIDATE RECEIVES A
MAJORITY OF THE VOTES CAST, EXCLUDING BLANK AND VOID BALLOTS. WHEN A
CANDIDATE RECEIVES A MAJORITY OF THE VOTES CAST, THAT CANDIDATE SHALL BE
DECLARED ELECTED.
4. IF A BALLOT HAS NO MORE AVAILABLE CHOICES RANKED ON IT, THAT BALLOT
SHALL BE DECLARED EXHAUSTED. WHERE A BALLOT SKIPS ONE OR MORE NUMBERS,
THAT BALLOT SHALL BE DECLARED EXHAUSTED WHEN THE SKIPPING OF NUMBERS IS
A. 5085 4
REACHED. A BALLOT WITH THE SAME NUMBER FOR TWO OR MORE CANDIDATES SHALL
BE DECLARED EXHAUSTED WHEN THESE DOUBLE NUMBERS ARE REACHED.
5. IN THE CASE OF A TIE BETWEEN CANDIDATES FOR LAST PLACE, AND THUS
ELIMINATION, OCCURRING AT ANY STAGE IN THE TABULATION, THE TIE SHALL BE
RESOLVED SO AS TO ELIMINATE THE CANDIDATE WHO RECEIVED THE LEAST NUMBER
OF VOTES AT THE PREVIOUS STAGE OF TABULATION. IN THE CASE OF A TIE TO
WHICH A PREVIOUS STAGE DOES NOT APPLY, OR SUCH PREVIOUS STAGE WAS ALSO A
TIE, THE TIE SHALL BE RESOLVED BY DRAWING LOTS. HOWEVER, IF THE TIE
OCCURS WHEN THERE ARE ONLY TWO CANDIDATES REMAINING, THE TIE SHALL BE
RESOLVED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CHAPTER.
§ 18-108. VOTER EDUCATION. WHERE A LOCAL GOVERNMENT SHALL PASS A
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE RANKED CHOICE VOTING METHOD, THE GOVERNING
BODY SHALL CONDUCT A VOTER EDUCATION CAMPAIGN ON THE RANKED CHOICE
VOTING SYSTEM TO FAMILIARIZE VOTERS WITH THE BALLOT DESIGN, METHOD OF
VOTING, AND ADVANTAGES OF DETERMINING A MAJORITY WINNER IN A SINGLE
ELECTION. THE GOVERNING BODY SHALL USE PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENTS, AS
WELL AS SEEK OTHER MEDIA COOPERATION TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICABLE.
§ 18-110. CONSTRUCTION. ALL ELECTIONS HELD BY THE RANKED CHOICE VOTING
METHOD PURSUANT TO THIS ARTICLE SHALL BE SUBJECT TO ALL THE OTHER
PROVISIONS OF THIS CHAPTER AND ALL OTHER APPLICABLE LAWS RELATING TO
ELECTIONS, SO FAR AS IS APPLICABLE AND NOT INCONSISTENT WITH THIS CHAP-
TER.
§ 3. Severability. If any provision of this act or the application
thereof shall for any reason be adjudged by any court of competent
jurisdiction to be invalid, such judgment shall not affect, impair, or
invalidate the remainder of this act, but shall be confined in its oper-
ation to the provision thereof directly involved in the controversy in
which such judgment shall have been rendered.
§ 4. This act shall take effect immediately, and shall expire December
31, 2026 when upon such date the provisions of this act shall be deemed
repealed. Effective immediately the addition, amendment and/or repeal
of any rule or regulation necessary for the implementation of this act
on its effective date are authorized to be made and completed on or
before such date.