Legislation

Search OpenLegislation Statutes

This entry was published on 2014-09-22
The selection dates indicate all change milestones for the entire volume, not just the location being viewed. Specifying a milestone date will retrieve the most recent version of the location before that date.
SECTION 396-RR
Price gouging; milk
General Business (GBS) CHAPTER 20, ARTICLE 26
§ 396-rr. Price gouging; milk. 1. Definitions. For the purposes of
this section, the following terms shall have the following meanings:

(a) "Person" shall mean the owner or owners, including any individual,
partnership, association, firm, or corporation, of an establishment
engaged in the retail sale of milk;

(b) "Commissioner" shall mean the commissioner of agriculture and
markets; and

(c) "Fluid milk" shall mean milk, skim milk or lowfat milk in consumer
sized packages sold or offered for sale for off premise consumption.

2. Whenever the commissioner has established a minimum price for milk
paid to producers pursuant to section two hundred fifty-eight-m of the
agriculture and markets law and such state ordered minimum price is
higher than the price set for milk within the state pursuant to the New
York-New Jersey milk marketing order, or at any time when the retail
price of fluid milk exceeds two hundred percent of the price for class I
fluid milk, it shall be the responsibility of the commissioner in
consultation with state and local agencies as the commissioner deems
appropriate, to examine the price of fluid milk at retail to determine
if the prices of fluid milk sold or offered for sale in the state or in
any area thereof appear to the commissioner unconscionably excessive.
Upon a determination by the commissioner that the price of fluid milk
being sold or offered for sale appears unconscionably excessive in a
particular area of the state, the commissioner shall, by written notice,
provide any person found to be selling or offering for sale fluid milk
at such price, an opportunity to discontinue such price levels or to
demonstrate that it is not unconscionably excessive. Any person, so
notified, who does not submit a written reply within three business days
of the receipt of such notice, and who does not within such time satisfy
the commissioner that the price level which resulted in the issuance of
the notice is justifiable or has been terminated shall be identified in
the commissioner's determination as a person apparently in violation of
subdivision three of this section. Following such notice to and
opportunity for such person to respond, the commissioner shall forward
his or her determination, in writing, together with all supporting
evidence, to the attorney general.

3. No person shall sell or offer for sale fluid milk for an amount
which represents an unconscionably excessive price.

4. Whether a price is unconscionably excessive is a question of law
for the court. Evidence that:

(a) the price charged at retail for fluid milk represents a gross
disparity between the raw milk price paid to producers plus a reasonable
handler's processing and distribution charge and the price at retail; or

(b) the price charged at retail for fluid milk increased a greater
amount than the price increased for an equivalent volume paid to
producers under an order or interim price of the commissioner pursuant
to section two hundred fifty-eight-m of the agriculture and markets law;
and

(c) in addition to paragraphs (a) and (b) of this subdivision, the
increased price charged by the person was not attributable to additional
charges imposed by its suppliers, or other charges beyond the control of
the person, including the cost of labor, shall constitute prima facie
proof of a violation of this section in any proceeding commenced by the
attorney general pursuant to subdivision five of this section.

5. Where a determination and all supporting evidence have been
forwarded from the commissioner, the attorney general may apply in the
name of the people of the state of New York to the supreme court of the
state of New York within the judicial district in which such violations
are alleged to have occurred, on notice of five days, for an order
enjoining or restraining commission or continuance of the alleged
unlawful acts. In any such proceeding, the court shall determine the
total excessive charge for fluid milk sold. In such proceeding, the
court shall assess a civil penalty in the sum of the total excessive
charge for fluid milk sold plus an amount not to exceed:

(a) one thousand dollars, where the aggregate amount of fluid milk
sold is one thousand gallons or less per week; or

(b) five thousand dollars, where the aggregate amount of fluid milk
sold exceeds one thousand gallons per week; and

(c) in addition to paragraphs (a) and (b) of this subdivision where
appropriate, order restitution to aggrieved consumers.

6. The commissioner shall promulgate all rules and regulations to
effectuate the purposes of this section.