With the passage of New York’s Environmental Bond Act, officially known as the Restore Mother Nature Bond Act, along with the state budget earlier this month, communities across the state are potentially slated to gain access to roughly $3 billion in bond funding for various environmental and infrastructure projects should voters give final approval to the borrowing in November 2022.
The money that would be provided through the act is intended for projects that fall into four broad categories, according to a report by Rebuild by Design, a community and engineering advocacy organization formed in the wake of Hurricane Sandy. They are:
Water quality improvement
- Climate change mitigation
- Open space land conservation
- Flood risk reduction
Rebuild By Design estimated that the bond act has the potential to generate 65,000 jobs, and State Sen. Todd Kaminsky called the funding a “once-in-a-generation” opportunity to improve or replace aging infrastructure in Elmont and Valley Stream. Valley Stream, Kaminsky said, could request funding for the replacement of its sewer systems. “Valley Stream has been a community for well over 100 years,” he said, noting that some of its municipal infrastructure dates to its founding. “. . . It’s very rare for this kind of money to become available.”
While the bond act outlines allowable uses for the funding, it would remain up to municipalities — villages, the Town of Hempstead and Nassau County — to identify need and administer the projects, Kaminsky said.
Guy Jacob, a retired teacher at Wheeler Avenue Elementary School in Valley Stream and an environment advocate, said that the bond act would provide a number of benefits, including clean-energy infrastructure, but in light of rising ocean levels, Jacob took issue with the relatively large amount of funds earmarked for shoreline replenishment and storm-mitigation projects, which he said would be a futile effort. According to the act, a third of the bond money would be made available for those projects.
“There is no infrastructure that would prevent disaster from such a sea level rise,” Jacob said. “Much better to spend that $1 billion subsidizing energy-efficiency infrastructure, distributed solar, electronic vehicles and ground-source heat pumps.”
Additionally, he said shoreline restoration projects might do more harm than good. “They mess with a dynamic system to create very temporary fixes,” Jacob said, “even while they engender more environmental problems.”
State Assemblywoman Michaelle Solages, a Democrat from Elmont, said that as severe storms become more frequent, such protection might be necessary. “We saw after [Hurricane] Sandy and [Tropical Storm] Irene that our infrastructure is quite weak,” Solages said.
Areas in Elmont, and northern and southwestern Valley Stream, are still prone to flooding, she said, noting a $3.8 million state-funded storm-resiliency project completed in Millbrook in September 2019 as an example of the type of construction the bond funds could enable. The Town of Hempstead-administered project restored wetlands along Hook Creek, replaced failing wooden bulkheads, improved storm-water drainage and created a pathway park running from Mill Road to Cloverfield Road South, an area extensively damaged by Sandy.
“That was a small vision of what green infrastructure can do for our communities,” Solages said, and with the warming of the planet accelerating, she added, it is now or never to make big investments in green infrastructure and technology.
“It’s just a good investment, just like us bonding for smart schools,” she said. “With Covid, that money paid itself back, and we need to be at the forefront of this issue. We’re in a climate crisis, and we don’t have time. If we’re fighting a losing battle, at least in New York state, we can get a leg up and protect what natural resources we have.”