1 JOINT HEARING BEFORE THE NEW YORK STATE SENATE STANDING COMMITTEE ON ETHICS AND 2 INTERNAL GOVERNANCE; SENATE STANDING COMMITTEE ON WOMEN'S ISSUES; 3 SENATE STANDING COMMITTEE ON INVESTIGATIONS AND GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS; 4 ASSEMBLY STANDING COMMITTEE ON LABOR; and ASSEMBLY TASK FORCE ON WOMEN�S ISSUES 5 ----------------------------------------------------- 6 JOINT PUBLIC HEARING: 7 TO EXAMINE SEXUAL HARASSMENT ISSUES IN THE WORKPLACE 8 ----------------------------------------------------- 9 Assembly Hearing Room 1923 250 Broadway, 19th Floor 10 New York, New York 11 Date: May 24, 2019 Time: 10:00 a.m. 12 13 PRESIDING: 14 Senator Alessandra Biaggi, Chair Senate Standing Committee on 15 Ethics and Internal Governance 16 Assemblyman Marcos Crespo, Chair Assembly Standing Committee on Labor 17 Senator Julia Salazar, Chair 18 Senate Standing Committee on Women�s Issues 19 Senator James Skoufis, Chair Senate Standing Committee on 20 Investigations and Government Operations 21 Assemblywoman Latrice Walker, Chair Assembly Task Force on Women�s Issues 22 23 24 25 2 1 SENATE MEMBERS PRESENT: 2 Senator Jamaal Bailey 3 Senator David Carlucci 4 Senator Andrew Gounardes 5 Senator Brad Hoylman 6 Senator Liz Krueger 7 Senator John Liu 8 Senator Shelley Mayer 9 Senator Zelnor Myrie 10 11 ASSEMBLY MEMBERS PRESENT: 12 Assemblyman David Buchwald 13 Assemblywoman Catalina Cruz 14 Assemblywoman Natalia Fernandez 15 Assemblyman Dick Gottfried 16 Assemblyman Michael Montesano 17 Assemblywoman Yuh-Line Niou 18 Assemblymember Felix Ortiz 19 Assemblyman Dan Quart 20 Assemblyman Edward P. Ra 21 Assemblywoman Linda B. Rosenthal 22 Assemblywoman Rebecca Seawright 23 Assemblywoman Jo Anne Simon 24 Assemblywoman Aravella Simotas 25 3 1 SPEAKERS: PAGE QUESTIONS 2 Melissa Franco 15 34 3 Deputy Commissioner of Enforcement Gina Martinez 15 34 4 Deputy Commissioner, Regional Affairs and Federal Programs 5 Dana Sussman 15 34 Deputy Commissioner, Intergovernmental 6 Affairs and Policy New York City Commission on Human Rights 7 Michael Volforte 206 214 8 Director NYS Governor's Office of 9 Employee Relations 10 Noelle Damico 261 270 Senior Fellow 11 National Economic and Social Rights Initiative 12 Sara Ziff 304 309 13 Founder, and Executive Director Model Alliance 14 Marissa Hoechstetter 320 333 15 Personal Story 16 Andrea Johnson 379 408 Senior Counsel 17 National Women's Law Center 18 Miriam Clark 379 408 President 19 National Employment Lawyers' Association/NY Affiliate 20 Laurie Morrison 379 408 21 Employee Advocate Member, National Employment Lawyers' 22 Association/NY Affiliate 23 24 25 4 1 SPEAKERS (continued): PAGE QUESTIONS 2 Ashley Sawyer 463 487 3 Director of Policy & Government Relations 4 Kylynn Grier 463 487 Policy Manager 5 Neillah Petit Frere 463 487 Member, Sisters in Strength 6 Rose Antoine 463 487 Member, Sisters in Strength 7 Stacey King 463 487 Member, Sisters in Strength 8 Marie St. Fort 463 487 Member, Sisters in Strength 9 Girls for Gender Equity 10 Marissa Senteno 509 531 Enforcement Program Manager 11 Daniela Contreras 509 531 New York Organizer 12 National Domestic Workers Alliance 13 Cynthia Lowney 560 609 Attorney 14 Personal Story Marie Guerrera Tooker 560 609 15 Personal Story Christine Reardon 560 609 16 Personal Story Dennis Reardon 560 609 17 Personal Story 18 Helen Rosenthal 620 626 Council Member 19 New York City 20 Leeja Carter, Ph.D. 634 658 Development and Management Manager 21 Black Women�s Blueprint 22 Dr. Red Washburn 634 658 Director, Women�s and Gender Studies, 23 and Associate Professor of English Kingsborough Community College 24 25 5 1 SPEAKERS (continued): PAGE QUESTIONS 2 Audacia Ray 634 658 3 Director of Community Organizing & Public Advocacy 4 Briana Silberberg 634 658 Community Organizer 5 New York City Anti-Violence Project 6 Veronica Avila 692 711 Organizer 7 Yasmine (ph.), Member 692 711 (Also speaking for Gemma Rossi, 8 Restaurant Worker) Restaurant Opportunities Center of New York 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 6 1 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMON: Okay, we're going to 2 begin our hearing this morning, our joint hearing 3 between the New York State Senate and the New York 4 State Assembly, on Sexual Harassment in the 5 Workplace. 6 Today is May 24, 2019. 7 I am State Senator Alessandra Biaggi. I will 8 be one of the co-chairs on the State Senate side. 9 And I'm joined by my co-chair on the Assembly 10 side, Assemblymember Marcus Crespo. 11 I'm going to begin with some opening remarks, 12 and then I'm going hand it over to the Assembly to 13 also have some opening remarks, and remind us of our 14 time constraints in terms of our testimony that we 15 have here today. 16 I'm also joined by my co-chair, 17 Senator Salazar on my right. 18 And later in the afternoon I'll be joined by 19 Senator James Skoufis. 20 For the first time in 27 years, on Wednesday, 21 February 13, 2019, joint public hearings of the 22 New York State Legislature were held on the subject 23 of sexual harassment in the workplace. 24 February's hearing was convened in response 25 to a troubling pattern of high rates of persistent 7 1 and continuing behavior of harassment over the past 2 quarter century. 3 More currently, and specifically, the hearing 4 was an outgrowth of, and in response to, the 5 courageous efforts of seven former New York State 6 legislative employees who witnessed, reported, or 7 experienced sexual harassment during their time 8 working in state government. 9 They formed the Sexual Harassment Working 10 Group, and have played an essential role in ensuring 11 that there will be action to deal with the issue. 12 At the urging of these brave women and other 13 tireless advocates, and men, the goal of the hearing 14 was to gather information that would reveal 15 opportunities to create stronger and clearer 16 policies and procedures that will endure in public 17 and private sectors throughout the state. 18 We hope that the hearing might aid in the 19 strengthening of proposed legislation, and spur the 20 development of new legislation, that will make 21 New York State a leader in workplace safety and 22 anti-harassment law. 23 We heard from the federal, state, and city 24 agencies that play roles in policy development and 25 enforcement of workplace safety. 8 1 Representative experts from advocacy 2 organizations testified about the shocking nature of 3 harassing behaviors, and recommended pathways for 4 strengthening policy and enacting new legislation. 5 Finally, and most powerfully, individual 6 witnesses delivered searing testimony about their 7 lived experiences of being subjected to sexual 8 harassment while working in government. 9 It was universally found that there is a lack 10 of reliable policy and standard reporting structures 11 that address victims in a trauma-informed manner. 12 Critical gaps and obstructions impede timely 13 and complete reporting of harassing behaviors. 14 Throughout the hearing, witnesses exposed the 15 grossly inadequate avenues of recourse available to 16 them, and widespread institutional failure to 17 resolve matters without subjecting survivors to 18 further harm. 19 Clearly, one hearing on this subject, after 20 27 years of silence, is insufficient to address the 21 scope and stubbornness of this problem, and to help 22 us fully understand how to best refurbish policies 23 and develop appropriate and enduring legislation 24 that protects all workers in the state of New York. 25 Absent from the February hearing were key 9 1 state governmental agencies, such as the New York 2 State Human Rights Division, who is joining us here 3 today, and the New York State Governor's Office of 4 Employee Relations, that provide oversight, and 5 exist as repositories for reporting. 6 Without the opportunity to hear from these 7 critical agencies and evaluate how policies were 8 developed and how complaints are fielded, an entire 9 dataset germane to making improvements in the system 10 has not been captured. 11 Despite the 11-hour marathon of February's 12 hearing, blue-collar and service workers who were 13 scheduled to testify were not able to. Some did not 14 have access to sufficient child care to remain with 15 us into the night. 16 As a result, their voices remain unheard. 17 Professional white-collar governmental 18 workers were the only individual victims of sexual 19 harassment available to testify. 20 We did not hear from any women or men of 21 color. 22 We know that when the target of harassment is 23 both a woman and a member of a racial minority 24 group, the risk of experiencing harassing behaviors 25 is greatly increased because that if -- because, 10 1 beyond that, if the individual belonged to only one 2 of those groups. 3 Many service workers earn minimum wage or 4 rely on tips, and have less than optimal control 5 over their schedules, especially if they have 6 dependent children. 7 Taking this all into account, and reflecting 8 on the importance of hearing from as many voices 9 across all employment sectors as possible, we are 10 conducting today's hearing. 11 Finally, we need further testimony from those 12 governmental leaders and agencies responsible for 13 the laws and internal guidelines in places so we can 14 closely examine the disparity between their 15 intentions and the willful outcomes. 16 Developing policy that is rigorous enough to 17 produce better results requires a complete 18 exploration. 19 Through examination of past practice will 20 enable us to determine how we have failed to achieve 21 desired outcomes. 22 It is not enough to have strong laws. We 23 must also have enforcement systems that function 24 with equal strength. 25 We laid the groundwork in February that 11 1 demands additional hearings in order to have a clear 2 survey of the landscape before we begin to build a 3 truly strong framework as a foundation for new 4 structures. 5 Survivors need to be heard so that oversight 6 and enforcement bodies can develop informed policies 7 and procedures. 8 Our work is off to a good start, but it has 9 only just begun. 10 I'd like to address those who have chosen to 11 testify with a moment of gratitude. 12 It is because of your courage and your 13 willingness to share your experiences today that 14 New York can move one step closer towards building a 15 society and culture that is harassment-free. 16 And I before I hand it over to my Assembly 17 co-chair, I would like to acknowledge all of my 18 Senate colleagues who are here today. 19 On my right we have Senator Liz Krueger, 20 Senator Andrew Gounardes, Senator David Carlucci, 21 Senator Jessica Ramos. 22 In the first row in front of us, we have 23 Senator John Liu, Senator Brad Hoylman, 24 Senator Shelley Mayer, and Senator Zelnor Myrie. 25 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Thank you, Senator. 12 1 Appreciate your leadership on these issues, 2 and to work with you. 3 It's a great experience to be able to work 4 with you on these issues, and to talk about ways to 5 improve the workplace throughout the state of 6 New York, and all industries. 7 I am joined by a number of my colleagues in 8 the New York State Assembly: 9 Assemblywoman Aravella Simotas; 10 Assemblywoman Rebecca Seawright; 11 Assemblywoman Catalina Cruz; 12 Assemblymember Dan Quart; 13 Assemblymember Dick Gottfried; 14 Assemblywoman Jo Anne Simon; 15 Assemblymembers Ra, Montesano; 16 Assemblymember David Buchwald; 17 And Assemblywoman Yuh-Line Niou. 18 And we are -- many of us were in the first 19 hearing that lasted those 11 1/2 hours, but it 20 wasn't enough. 21 And as the Senator mentioned, too many 22 presenters were not able to give their testimony and 23 there are still too many voices to be heard. 24 We know that this issue continues to prevail 25 in the workplace, to occur in all industries. 13 1 Discrimination and sexual harassment need to 2 be eradicated from our workplace, and we have work 3 to do. 4 Despite our efforts in last year's budget, 5 and there were significant measures included in our 6 budget, more work needs to be done. 7 And that remains clear from the powerful 8 testimony of those that came forward, the victims, 9 that spoke to us in the first hearing, and those 10 that we'll hear from today. 11 There is still room for improvement, and 12 room -- and ways for us to strengthen, not only the 13 protections, but the enforcement mechanisms, as was 14 mentioned by the Senator. 15 I think about this from a personal 16 perspective. My 19-year-old daughter who's a 17 sophomore in Queens College, or my 5- and 18 6-year-olds who are first-graders in the Bronx. 19 I want to make sure that they are able to 20 enter a workplace where they are given every 21 opportunity in a harassment-free space. 22 And that's what we should aspire to, and we 23 have to challenge ourselves; to not rest on our 24 laurels, to not assume that things are okay, to not 25 think that what we have already done is sufficient, 14 1 when we continue to hear horror stories, and -- 2 and -- and -- and abuse, taking place across the 3 board; and, again, it's important to note, in all 4 industries, affecting all communities, affecting all 5 racial demographics, affecting all genders. 6 We need to make sure that we strengthen our 7 policies. 8 You're seeing already significant pieces of 9 legislation introduced by many of my colleagues who 10 are here today, and others. 11 And we want to make sure that, through your 12 voices, we can strengthen those bills, and make sure 13 that we move forward with a strong legislative 14 package. 15 We will probably never eradicate this from 16 ever happening again, but we need to make sure that 17 we make it a rare occurrence, and not the norm, in 18 the workplace. 19 That is our goal, and we will work hard to 20 make sure that, together, we accomplish that in 21 terms of our policies in the state of New York. 22 So I'm grateful for this opportunity to hear 23 your testimony. 24 I will remind my colleagues, again, that we 25 want to provide as much time to those presenters. 15 1 After 5:30, in this building, security 2 leaves. 3 So we can remain; however, if you leave the 4 building after 5:30 p.m., they will -- you will not 5 be able to re-enter. 6 So, keep that in mind, and we'll keep 7 reminding you as the day goes on. 8 But we want to ask our colleagues as well, to 9 keep your questions direct and succinct, so we can 10 ensure that the presenters have as much time as they 11 need. 12 And, again, thank you, all, for being a part 13 of this important conversation. 14 SENATOR BIAGGI: Thank you. 15 Our first witnesses who will be testifying, 16 is the New York State Division of Human Rights, are 17 Melissa Franco, the deputy commissioner for 18 enforcement, and, Gina Martinez, the deputy 19 commissioner for regional affairs and federal 20 programs. 21 And they will be joined by the New York City 22 Commission on Human Rights, who is represented by 23 Dana Sussman, the deputy commissioner of 24 intergovernmental affairs and policy. 25 Thank you for being with us today. 16 1 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: Good morning, everyone. 2 Distinguished members of the Committee, thank 3 you for the opportunity to discuss the important 4 issue of sexual harassment in the workplace on 5 behalf of the New York State Division of Human 6 Rights. 7 My name is Melissa Franco, and I am the 8 deputy commissioner of enforcement. 9 I am joined here by my colleague, 10 Gina Martinez, who is the deputy commissioner of 11 regional affairs and federal programs. 12 The New York State Human Rights Law prohibits 13 discrimination on a wide range of protected classes, 14 including prohibited sex discrimination and sexual 15 harassment in employment, housing, credit, and 16 places of public accommodation, volunteer 17 firefighting, and educational institutions. 18 The Human Rights Law also provides separate 19 protections against retaliation. 20 Last year Governor Cuomo signed a 21 ground-breaking package of legislation that 22 strengthened protections against sexual harassment. 23 Now employers can be held liable under the 24 Human Rights Law to non-employees performing work in 25 the workplace; for example, independent contractors, 17 1 consultants, service providers, and delivery persons 2 who were sexually harassed. 3 This applies to all employers of any size, 4 public or private. 5 Today, any individual in a workplace, of any 6 size, public or private, is entitled to protections 7 against sexual harassment under the law. 8 If an employer is found liable under the 9 Human Rights Law for sexual harassment, they may be 10 ordered to provide injunctive or appropriate 11 affirmative relief, back and front pay, and 12 compensatory damages for emotional distress. 13 Civil fines and penalties and attorney fees 14 may also be awarded in sexual-harassment cases. 15 The division of human rights was created in 16 1945 to enforce the Human Rights Law, to ensure that 17 all New Yorkers have an opportunity to participate 18 fully in the economic, cultural, and intellectual 19 life of the state. 20 DHR investigates, hears, and adjudicates 21 complaints filed by individuals, as well as those 22 brought by the division itself, to address systemic 23 discrimination. 24 DHR also engages in outreach and education 25 campaigns, designed to inform the public of the 18 1 effects of discrimination, and their rights and 2 obligations under the law, and issues, policies, 3 regulations, and guidance, implementing the 4 Human Rights Law, and addressing issues of 5 discrimination and harassment. 6 DHR has approximately 164 full-time 7 employees, including 63 investigators at 12 regional 8 offices across the state. 9 The agency receives over 6,000 individual 10 complaints annually, of which, approximately, 11 80 percent relate to employment. 12 For any claim of discrimination or 13 harassment, individuals may file a complaint with 14 DHR within one year of the last act of the alleged 15 discrimination. 16 Complaints with DHR can be filed in person at 17 any office, or can be sent in via e-mail, fax, or 18 mail. 19 If individuals need assistance filing a 20 complaint, they can call our hotline, or call or 21 visit any of our regional offices. 22 An individual does not need an attorney to 23 file a complaint or utilize our process. 24 DHR provides free translation and 25 interpretation assistance at all offices. 19 1 Once a complaint is filed with our agency, it 2 is reviewed to determine if DHR has jurisdiction 3 over the conduct alleged. 4 Next, the investigators conduct an 5 investigation into whether there is probable cause. 6 As part of this process, investigators may issue 7 written requests for information, visit the site of 8 the alleged incident, and meet with the parties 9 and/or witnesses. 10 Once DHR receives and files a complaint, it 11 is served upon the respondent, who is asked to 12 respond to it in writing. 13 Any responses received are sent to the 14 complainant, who is given an opportunity to provide 15 a rebuttal. 16 Once a final determination is made, both 17 parties will receive a written determination in the 18 mail. 19 Currently, 97 percent of all claims 20 investigated by DHR are completed and determinations 21 are made within 180 days. 22 During 2008, the average processing time to 23 investigate a sexual-harassment case at the division 24 was 172 days. 25 If the investigator finds no probable cause 20 1 or lacks -- or a lack of jurisdiction, the complaint 2 is dismissed. 3 A complainant may appeal this dismissal 4 within 60 days to the State Supreme Court. 5 If a determination of probable cause is 6 found, the claim will then proceed to a public 7 hearing. 8 If a complainant doesn't have a private 9 counsel, the division will assign an attorney to the 10 claim. 11 If a settlement is not reached, the case will 12 be calendared for a public hearing before an 13 administrative law judge. 14 If the complainant does not have a private 15 attorney, the assigned division attorney will 16 interview the complainant, review the evidence in 17 the file, formulate a hearing strategy, and put 18 forth the evidence at the hearing. 19 The division attorney may also conduct 20 cross-examination of the respondent's witnesses, and 21 rebut any other evidence entered by the respondent. 22 A division administrative law judge reviews 23 all of the evidence, and then drafts a recommended 24 order for the commissioner's consideration. 25 The parties then have 21 days to file 21 1 objections to the recommended order. 2 The commissioner makes the final 3 determination as to whether the Human Rights Law has 4 been violated, and may award any available remedy 5 under the law. 6 Either party may appeal an order directly to 7 the State Supreme Court in the county where the 8 discrimination is alleged to have occurred. 9 DHR attorneys will appear in any of these 10 cases on appeal to support our findings of 11 discrimination in these matters. 12 DHR is also empowered by the New York State 13 Legislature to oppose systemic patterns of 14 discrimination through division-initiated 15 investigations and complaints. 16 The division-initiated investigation unit is 17 responsible for identifying, investigating, and 18 bringing complaints to remedy large-scale systemic 19 discrimination in New York State. 20 The unit identifies potential targets through 21 various means, including referrals from other state 22 agencies, anonymous tips, newspaper articles, and 23 meetings with various advocacy groups. 24 Once a potential target is identified, the 25 unit uses various investigative tools to gather 22 1 evidence to determine if a potential target has 2 violated the law. 3 If the evidence gathered shows a violation of 4 the law has occurred, the unit will file a complaint 5 on behalf of the State of New York. 6 It will then be investigated by a separate 7 regional office to determine whether there is 8 probable cause to believe that discrimination has 9 occurred. 10 If there is a determination of probable 11 cause, the complaint will proceed to a public 12 hearing before an administrative law judge. 13 The division is committed to the efficient 14 and effective investigation and adjudication of all 15 individual complaints of sexual harassment. 16 In light of the powerful organizing that is 17 laid bare the society-wide harm caused by sexual 18 assault, DHR is seeing a dramatic rise in complaints 19 coming forward. 20 Since 2016, there has been a 62 percent 21 increase in individual complaints of sexual 22 harassment filed with the division. 23 By taking effective action, DHR is able to 24 bring justice on behalf of complainants who have 25 faced such harassment. 23 1 For example, in 2017, DHR issued an order in 2 favor of three women from Western New York who faced 3 sexual harassment at the dental office where they 4 worked. The complainants were subjected to being 5 called derogatory names, persistent invites to 6 dates, inappropriate touching, and other offensive 7 behavior. 8 When one of the complainants notified her 9 manager of the unwanted sexual advances, the 10 employer countered by saying "the aggressor plays 11 like that." 12 The complainants were collectively awarded 13 over $152,000 in damages for emotional pain and 14 suffering, unlawful retaliation and discrimination 15 against them. And DHR issued a civil fine of 16 $60,000, payable to the State, for violating the 17 law, and required that the respondents to -- provide 18 additional training. 19 DHR order -- DHR's order was affirmed by the 20 Fourth Department, Appellate Division, this past 21 summer. 22 The division is also committed to ending 23 sexual harassment and other forms of discrimination 24 via outreach and education. 25 In 2018, and early 2019, the division 24 1 participated in approximately 40 education and 2 outreach presentations across the state, that 3 included discussions of preventing and addressing 4 sexual harassment. 5 Additionally, the division held six outreach 6 events that specifically focused on sexual 7 harassment, in Seneca Falls, Rochester, Cheektowaga, 8 Newburgh, Buffalo, and Long Island. 9 DHR is currently planning a robust outreach 10 and education campaign, which will include public 11 events and an active social-media presence, focusing 12 on all elements of the law, including protections 13 against sexual harassment. 14 As part of last year's harassment package, 15 the New York State Labor Law now requires all 16 employers in New York State to establish a 17 sexual-harassment policy, and provide annual 18 sexual-harassment training. 19 DHR was proud to work closely with the 20 department of labor in developing a model policy, 21 model complaint form, and model training for 22 employers to adopt in the workplaces, as well as an 23 easy, accessible website, with guidance and 24 resources for workers and employers on New York 25 State's laws against workplace sexual harassment. 25 1 Prior to being finalized, the models were 2 presented to stakeholders and the public for public 3 comments. And the department of labor and DHR held 4 meetings with employee and survivor groups, as well 5 as business leaders and employers across the state. 6 Hundreds of comments and suggestions were 7 reviewed and taken into account before the final 8 documents were released. 9 The model policies and trainings are 10 available online in readily accessible formats, 11 translated into eight languages. 12 Both the department of labor and DHR continue 13 to engage in outreach and education on the state 14 requirements, and we look forward to continuing 15 those efforts as part of our upcoming outreach and 16 education campaign. 17 Thank you all for the opportunity to discuss 18 the great work we do at DHR in our efforts to 19 protect all New Yorkers from harassment and 20 discrimination. 21 D.C. DANA SUSSMAN: Good morning, Senators 22 and Assemblymembers. 23 Thank you for convening today's joint hearing 24 on the critical issue of combating sexual harassment 25 in the workplace. 26 1 I am Dana Sussman, deputy commissioner for 2 intergovernmental affairs and policy at the New York 3 City Commission on Human Rights. 4 I'm pleased to be back with you again after 5 the first hearing on this topic in February. 6 And I want to thank you, and the tireless 7 advocates in the room today, who have brought us 8 together to continue this vital and overdue 9 conversation. 10 In February, my testimony focused primarily 11 on the ways in which the State Human Rights Law 12 could be amended to align itself more closely with 13 the New York City Human Rights Law, giving this 14 state law more teeth to hold harassers and those 15 that enable them accountable, and to afford more 16 victims the legal protections they need to pursue 17 justice. 18 My testimony identified four areas to 19 strengthen the law. 20 1. Correcting the decades of case law 21 establishing the unnecessarily high, severe, or 22 pervasive standard as the New York State legal 23 standard for sexual harassment. 24 2. Explicitly rejecting the Faragher-Ellerth 25 affirmative defense. 27 1 3. Making it possible for managers and 2 supervisors, even if they do not have an ownership 3 interest in the employer, to be held personally 4 liable for sexual harassment; and, 5 4. Ensuring that punitive-damage awards are 6 available with respect to State Human Rights Law 7 claims, as they are under other civil rights laws. 8 Today I'm here to briefly discuss the work of 9 the commission's gender-based harassment unit, and 10 several recent developments in the commission's 11 efforts to combat sexual harassment in the 12 workplace. 13 The gender-based harassment unit at the 14 commission was launched in January of this year, 15 with the budget of $300,000. It has personal lines 16 for four dedicated staff members, one supervisor, 17 two attorneys, and one non-attorney investigator. 18 As soon as an individual with a workplace 19 sexual-harassment claim contacts the commission 20 through our general intake line or our web form, the 21 unit supervisor is alerted, and will make a quick 22 assessment as to whether there should be any 23 immediate action taken. 24 While most individuals who report workplace 25 sexual-harassment cases to the commission come to us 28 1 after they have left their place of employment, 2 there are certain situations in which the unit may 3 be able to intervene early and quickly to 4 de-escalate a situation or to prevent retaliation. 5 In some circumstances, the unit has been able 6 to intervene immediately to ensure that evidence is 7 preserved, either through surveillance video footage 8 or documentary evidence, or, to obtain an immediate 9 transfer of a victim of harassment to ensure the 10 victim is not interacting with the alleged harasser. 11 Not all circumstances warrant immediate 12 intervention, so, for most cases, attorneys in the 13 unit will meet with the complainant within several 14 weeks after the initial call or e-mail, unless there 15 is an urgent need to bring them in earlier, for 16 example, where a statute of limitations may be 17 running. 18 The unit's attorneys primarily focus on 19 workers in low-wage industries. And while the 20 commission has cases of workplace sexual harassment 21 spanning all industries, in both high-paying and 22 low-wage work, the unit has identified the private 23 security and building-management industry and the 24 hospital industry, particularly the restaurant 25 industry, where -- which represent a 29 1 disproportionate amount of the unit's cases. 2 Those industries highlight the 3 vulnerabilities of workers who experience harassment 4 in isolated and disconnected workplaces, and the 5 lack of a clear or centralized management or 6 reporting structure. 7 The gender-based harassment unit also reports 8 that, while most of the victims of cases at the 9 commission are women, they're seeing a significant 10 number of men who are now reporting sexual 11 harassment. 12 The vast majority of the alleged sexual 13 harassers, although not all, are men, including in 14 the cases in which men are the victim. 15 While the unit's work is focused on 16 investigating and prosecuting workplace 17 sexual-harassment claims, other attorneys in the 18 agency's law enforcement bureau also handle 19 sexual-harassment cases. 20 There are simply too many for the unit to 21 handle alone. 22 The commission's caseload of workplace 23 gender-discrimination cases that include a 24 harassment claim doubled in a single year after 25 Tarana Burke's #MeToo movement relaunched in late 30 1 2017, from 56 in 2017, to 115 in 2018. 2 And I note that this number is slightly 3 higher than the number I reported in February, 4 because it didn't account for some very late 2018 5 filings. 6 For the first four months of 2019, the 7 commission filed an additional 42 complaints of 8 workplace gender discrimination that included a 9 harassment claim. 10 And as of April 30, 2019, the commission is 11 investigating 207 total cases. That includes 12 13 matters in a pre-complaint posture, in which the 13 commission is seeking to resolve matters before a 14 complaint is filed. 15 I also want to highlight a significant recent 16 development since the hearing in February. 17 In March of this year, the State Supreme 18 Court, in Automatic Meter Reading Corporation versus 19 The NYC Commission on Human Rights, upheld the 2015 20 commission decision and order in a workplace 21 sexual-harassment case. 22 The commissioner's decision and order was 23 issued in late 2015 before the #MeToo reawakening, 24 which demonstrates the leadership and the commitment 25 of the commission to recognize the seriousness of 31 1 these claims. 2 The commission ordered the highest-ever civil 3 penalty in commission history, the only time we've 4 ordered this amount, and the highest available under 5 the City Human Rights Law, at $250,000, for willful, 6 wanton, or malicious conduct; in addition to over 7 $420,00 in total damages to the complainant, 8 including back pay, front pay, interest, and $200,00 9 in emotional-distress damages. 10 The case involved a business owner who 11 sexually harassed a female employee over a 12 three-year period, repeatedly engaging in unwanted 13 touching, regularly using lewd and 14 sexually-inappropriate language to and about her, 15 and posting a sexually-explicit cartoon in the 16 workplace identified as the complainant. 17 The State Supreme Court's decision in March, 18 upholding the commission's order, is significant, in 19 that it had -- it upheld one of the highest damages' 20 awards and the highest civil penalty in commission 21 history in a sexual-harassment case, reaffirming 22 that sexual harassment causes real emotional and 23 mental trauma, and devastating economic 24 consequences, to those who experience it. 25 It also affirmed the commission's finding 32 1 that the complainant was constructively discharged 2 from her employment; meaning, that the sexual 3 harassment made the workplace so unbearable, that 4 she had no other option but to leave. 5 The State Supreme -- the State Court decision 6 further reinforces that administrative agencies 7 tasked with enforcing local anti-discrimination laws 8 are entitled to deference in their decision-making, 9 and it sets a precedent for the issuance of the high 10 penalties and damages where the evidence supports 11 it. 12 My last update is that, on April 1, the 13 commission launched its online, interactive, and 14 free anti-sexual-harassment training. The training 15 can be used to meet both the new City- and 16 State-mandated annual anti-sexual-harassment 17 training requirement. 18 It is fully accessible to people with hearing 19 and vision disabilities and mobility disabilities. 20 It is available in Spanish, with nine additional 21 languages on its way, and it is optimized for smart 22 use -- for smartphone use as well. 23 The training uses a story-based learning 24 model; features scenarios drawn from real cases, and 25 highlights the ways in which sexual harassment 33 1 commonly intersects with other protected categories, 2 including race, immigration status, national origin, 3 religion, sexual orientation, gender identity, and 4 pregnancy and lactation. 5 It educates the user on the complainant -- on 6 the commission's encompassing definition of 7 "gender," which includes gender identity and gender 8 expression, and of its broad and protective 9 sexual-harassment standard. 10 It also provides tools and strategies for 11 bystanders to disrupt patterns of sexual harassment. 12 The training was developed with, and 13 incorporates feedback, from over two dozen external 14 stakeholders, including some of the stakeholders and 15 advocates in this room today. 16 Several government partners from our sister 17 agencies on the state level, and several dozen 18 internal city-agency administration partners, 19 representing interests and expertise across city 20 government. 21 The training includes content that fulfills 22 both the State and City requirements for 23 anti-sexual-harassment training, and can be used by 24 employers both within the city and outside the city, 25 across the state, to meet the training requirement. 34 1 And, as of May 23, earlier this week, the 2 training has now been completed over 25,000 times 3 since we launched a month and a half ago. 4 That's an undercount, because it does not 5 reflect how many people view the training together 6 at once, because multiple people or entire 7 workforces can watch and participate in the training 8 together. And that would only account for one 9 completion. 10 We are grateful to be here today for the 11 second hearing on workplace sexual harassment 12 convened by the New York State Assembly and the 13 Senate this year. 14 To the women, men, and non-binary people who 15 have organized, spoken out, and demanded action, 16 accountability, and system change, we, as 17 government, are in your debt. 18 Thank you. 19 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Thank you, 20 Deputy Commissioners, for your presentation, and for 21 agreeing to do this jointly. It's an interesting 22 approach you both have. 23 Let me try this. 24 For the City of New York, you -- for the last 25 10 years, you have applied a different standard. 35 1 You do not apply (indiscernible) gives a -- more 2 opportunities for cases to be considered, heard, or 3 determinations to be made. 4 I'm curious, in those 10 years, has there -- 5 has the sky fallen on the employer community? 6 Has -- have you seen a detrimental impact to 7 the city's economy because of this policy? 8 D.C. DANA SUSSMAN: Well, I'm no economist, 9 but I will say that, we understand our standard in a 10 way -- we've heard that most employers or most 11 employees expect workplace conduct to align with the 12 standard that the City law sets out; that people are 13 typically surprised that other standards across the 14 country and the state standard is what it is, 15 because I think expectations of workplace conduct in 16 2019, or at least for the past few decades, have 17 comported more closely with the being treated less 18 well because of your gender standard than the 19 "severe/pervasive" standard. 20 So I think what's interesting is that, it 21 seems like the law needs to catch up to what the 22 current expectations of conduct are in the 23 workplace. 24 So I -- and I can say, I have not seen the 25 sky fall, but, again, I'm no economist. I wouldn't 36 1 be able to reflect on -- on the impact to the 2 New York City economy, but it's not something I've 3 seen. 4 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: And with the increase in 5 case, you mentioned also in your testimony, that 6 there's been an increase in reports. 7 Have you -- has the city council been helpful 8 in increasing your budget significantly in order to 9 address these issues? 10 D.C. DANA SUSSMAN: We are always in constant 11 communication with the council, with the 12 administration, about resources, and about how we 13 can be flexible and responsive to the need, which is 14 one of the reasons why I think our -- the 15 gender-based harassment unit is particularly 16 important, because we can get cases, particularly 17 urgent ones, where someone may be in the situation 18 and needs an immediate transfer or needs to 19 negotiate a way out, they can come to us quickly. 20 So we're trying to be -- the litigation and 21 administrative process is long, we recognize that, 22 and not everyone is situated to go through that full 23 process. 24 So, we try to work with the resources we have 25 to provide the appropriate response. 37 1 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: And then, speaking of 2 litigation, so if someone files a complaint with -- 3 a City employee files a complaint with your agency, 4 do they have the option to also go to court? 5 D.C. DANA SUSSMAN: You can come to the 6 commission at a certain point in the process, before 7 we issue a decision, a determination, whether it's 8 probable cause or no probable cause, you can remove 9 your case from our agency and take it to court. 10 After it crosses a threshold into a 11 determination at the City level, you've, 12 essentially, chosen your venue, and you would not be 13 able to go to court. 14 But you preserve your right with respect to 15 federal claims, if you file with the City 16 commission, it's cross-filed with the EEOC. So that 17 preserves your federal claims as well. 18 And you could, again, remove your complaint 19 from our agency and choose to go court at a certain 20 point in the process. 21 But if you sort of choose to proceed to 22 completion, then the venue has been chosen, and that 23 would be the commission. 24 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Then, for the State, so, 25 first of all, I've got to preface whatever I ask 38 1 with this: 2 I appreciate the work you all do. And I'm 3 sure that everyone in your agency is fully committed 4 to doing the best they can with limited resources. 5 And I'm sure your experience had -- we do in 6 the Legislature, I'm sure you have the same 7 challenge, given, particularly, the increase in 8 caseloads that you've seen. 9 I'm very bad at math, but, 6,000 cases, and 10 you have 63 officers -- 11 OFF-CAMERA SPEAKER: (Inaudible.) 12 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Investigators? 13 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: Investigators, yes. 14 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: So, 164 full-time, but 15 63 investigators; so, 95 cases each, more or less? 16 Is that -- 17 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: It depends. 18 We have an office that is completely 19 dedicated to sexual harassment. It's the office of 20 sexual-harassment issues. 21 If you want to do an average, I would say the 22 regional offices around the state -- 23 We also have an office dedicated to housing 24 discrimination, so that's a totally different 25 office. 39 1 -- if I think of the numbers, I would say 2 there's probably -- taking out housing, I would say 3 50 to 60 cases. It fluctuates. 4 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: So it's -- but it's fair 5 to say that the investigators have their fair share 6 of work? 7 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: A heavy caseload, 8 absolutely, yes. 9 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: And, anecdotally, do you 10 hear them often, maybe, express a sentiment that, 11 somebody got away with one; that they just -- you 12 know, there was something wrong, but, they just 13 could not meet the standard, they just couldn't 14 prove it? 15 Do you hear that? 16 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: I haven't heard that. 17 It's hard to say "somebody got away with 18 one." 19 We construe our law with a liberal 20 interpretation. 21 I wouldn't be able to say, I mean -- 22 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: I know it's a tough one. 23 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: -- it is (indiscernible 24 cross-talking) -- 25 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: I'm not trying to put 40 1 you on the spot. 2 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: -- (indiscernible) 3 tough -- 4 (Indiscernible cross-talking.) 5 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: The reason -- I guess 6 what I'm really trying to get at is this: 7 We know the City has done away with this 8 "severe and pervasive" standard, and it has created 9 a better road map for cases to be brought forward 10 and/or investigated and/or, you know, decisions to 11 have been made. 12 We seem to keep hearing that we are applying 13 a standard that makes it too difficult, often cases, 14 to find justice. 15 And, I -- I mean, and that's a policy 16 decision that I guess we would have to make. 17 But, how do you feel, do you -- would you 18 welcome a -- the City standard at the state level? 19 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Well, I -- I -- I'd have 20 to say that, you know, we enforce the laws as 21 currently written. 22 If you believe that, you know, a change to 23 the law should be made, we'd certainly enforce it, 24 as you feel the need to strengthen it. 25 I do want to point out, for our cases, for 41 1 sexual-harassment cases in particular, we have a 2 probable-cause rate of about 25 percent. That's -- 3 that's a pretty high rate, that's a good rate, and 4 that's above the average for all cases. 5 So, we -- we -- going back to your prior 6 question, there's not too many of those that got 7 away. 8 And in terms of filing, you know, we have a 9 pretty easy process, as Deputy Commissioner Franco 10 stated earlier in her testimony. 11 People can come to our -- any of our regional 12 offices and file anywhere in the state. And they 13 can file, you know, via mail, e-mail. They can call 14 us and we will send them a complaint form, and we 15 will route it to the appropriate office. 16 And like I said, we take this very seriously. 17 We have an entire office that's dedicated to this 18 issue. 19 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: I don't doubt that. 20 I mean, if it was completely up to me, I'd 21 give you more resources so you can do even more. 22 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: And I would welcome that 23 with open arms. 24 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: But -- so, and one last 25 thing, so I asked this question of the City as well: 42 1 But, again, if somebody files -- if an employee 2 outside the city of New York files a complaint with 3 your office, do they have the option to go to court? 4 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: They do have the option 5 to go to court. We -- they can remove it to state 6 court even after a determination is made of probable 7 cause. 8 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Even after the 9 determination is made? 10 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: Yes. 11 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: And they can also file a 12 claim within three years of the alleged act of 13 discrimination. 14 So they have one year to file with us, and 15 three years to file in state court. 16 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: How many applications do 17 you get of someone who is past that one-year 18 deadline and has to be turn down, turned away? 19 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: I don't readily have 20 those numbers available, but I -- if you'd like, I 21 can find those out -- 22 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: I'm curious to know. 23 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: -- and forward them to 24 you. 25 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: And in that process, do 43 1 you notify, do you explain, to the person who 2 brought the complaint about their options to go to 3 court, and the timeline of when and how they should 4 proceed with that? 5 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Absolutely. 6 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Thank you. 7 SENATOR BIAGGI: I just want to acknowledge 8 that we've been joined by Senator Jamaal Bailey. 9 And we will hear now from Senator Salazar. 10 SENATOR SALAZAR: Thank you. 11 Thank you all for your testimony. 12 My -- I have a few questions for Dana. 13 First, I want to ask about, you mentioned 14 that the gender-based harassment unit's budget is 15 $300,000, and that there have been 207 cases, that 16 are both gender-based harassment and -- or, that are 17 gender-based harassment. 18 Is this enough, in your opinion -- and 19 I realize you said you're not an economist -- in 20 your opinion, or your experience, do you think that 21 this is adequate funding to handle that many cases? 22 D.C. DANA SUSSMAN: Well, like I said, the -- 23 you know, the unit has folks that are dedicated to 24 these cases. But, because there are quite a number 25 of them, and they are challenging cases to work on 44 1 and to collect the evidence around, attorneys in our 2 general, sort of, pool of investigating attorneys 3 handle these cases as well. 4 So it's not -- it's -- the unit is very 5 useful, especially when there's a quick response 6 that's needed. 7 But we also have attorneys who take on all 8 sorts of cases; also take on gender-based harassment 9 cases as well. 10 SENATOR SALAZAR: Excellent. 11 And then, also, regarding, you mentioned in 12 your testimony, that when the unit supervisor is 13 alerted to a claim, they'll make a quick assessment 14 as to whether there should be any immediate action 15 taken. 16 Could you possibly elaborate on what that 17 assessment -- what is factored in in that 18 assessment? 19 D.C. DANA SUSSMAN: Sure. 20 So our typical process is that, someone will 21 either send in -- complete our form on our website, 22 or will call our info line, and, either way, it gets 23 routed to our gender-based harassment unit 24 supervisor. 25 They will then look at the report, and will 45 1 often speak with the potential complainant directly. 2 And in the cases that they've highlighted for 3 me, they are -- there are situations in which 4 someone was actually harassed on the job interview; 5 was misgendered repeatedly, was harassed based on 6 gender identity and stereotyping. 7 And the unit was able to intervene quickly, 8 to ensure that the person was not discriminated 9 against in getting the job. And then once on the 10 job, would be, you know, not misgendered, not 11 harassed, not work with the person who interviewed 12 them. 13 So that was a unique situation in which the 14 person really was adamant about not filing a 15 complaint; wanted the job, didn't want to create a 16 huge fuss, but wanted to be treated with dignity and 17 respect, and not misgendered. 18 So -- so that's a unique situation. 19 But there have been others, where, it's -- 20 video surveillance was captured pretty quickly. 21 They would send out sort of a non-spoilation letter, 22 a preservation request, to say, We're initiating an 23 investigation. You must preserve this evidence and 24 deliver it to us; 25 Or, in other circumstances of immediate 46 1 transfer to a different location; 2 Or, a schedule change to avoid interaction 3 with the harasser. 4 So we can't -- you know, we have limited 5 ability to sort of prosecute cases without a 6 complaint filed. But what we can do is help, sort 7 of, navigate some of those complicated issues before 8 someone initiates the whole process. 9 SENATOR SALAZAR: And this is somewhat 10 related to my last question. 11 You also mentioned that, in the matters that 12 the commission is investigating, this includes 13 some -- in pre-complaint posture, where the 14 commission is seeking to resolve them before a 15 complaint is filed. 16 Could you maybe elaborate on what the 17 motivation has been, or might be, to resolve before 18 a complaint is filed? 19 Maybe this is obvious, but is -- is it just 20 for efficiency? Is it to minimize the process that 21 both parties have to go through? 22 D.C. DANA SUSSMAN: I think it's -- some of 23 those things. 24 I think there are people who call us, who 25 say, This is happening. I don't want to file a 47 1 complaint. 2 So there are a few options. 3 We can initiate our own investigation. 4 There have been a few instances, that I'm 5 aware of, where it's a restaurant. There's just 6 pervasive hostile work environment for every -- you 7 know, for many people. And we'd get reports of 8 that. 9 And so we'll initiate sort of a pre-complaint 10 intervention. We'll alert the respondent that we're 11 investigating. 12 And some respondents, before they're actually 13 respondents, will come to the table and say, Okay, 14 we know there's a problem. We want to fix it. How 15 can we work with you? 16 So we've negotiated mandated training, policy 17 development, and then ongoing monitoring, so that 18 they have to report back to the commission on the 19 steps that they've taken. 20 And if they don't, we can file a complaint; 21 Or, if we are notified that they're not 22 complying, we can file a complaint. 23 So it's a mix of efficiencies, what the 24 people coming forward want. 25 And -- and if a respondent is willing to come 48 1 to the table pretty early on, then we don't need to 2 go through, like, sort of extended investigation and 3 litigation. 4 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Before I go to 5 Assemblywoman Simotas, I want to acknowledge we've 6 been joined by Assemblywoman Latrice Walker, the 7 Chair of the Assembly Task Force on Women's Issues. 8 We have -- we'll be rotating back and forth 9 on the questions. 10 Assemblywoman Simotas. 11 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMOTAS: Thank you. 12 I'm sure we all can appreciate how difficult 13 it is to come to terms when somebody is being 14 sexually harassed in the workplace. 15 My question is for DHR. 16 Do you believe that one year is enough to -- 17 time to bring an action with your agency? 18 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: If you're -- I believe 19 you're talking about the statute of limitations. 20 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMOTAS: Yes. 21 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: May I begin by saying 22 that, when we do our education and outreach, one of 23 the first things that we do is, we make potential -- 24 we make individuals aware in the public that it is a 25 one-year from the last date of discrimination. 49 1 As to any changes in the statute of 2 limitations, of course it's up to you; and if you 3 changed it, we would abide by it. 4 However, in the administrative process, you 5 know, the idea is that a complaint be addressed and 6 adjudicated within a quicker manner than it would be 7 in court. 8 So we have found that, if witnesses come 9 closer in time to the last identified act, their 10 memories are better, the documents haven't been 11 destroyed, the respondents haven't gone out of 12 business. 13 So there is -- that's what we have seen. 14 However, if you choose to change the statute 15 of limitations, we welcome it, and we will abide by 16 it. 17 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMOTAS: I have another 18 question, follow-up to that. 19 You know, normally, you would think that, if 20 somebody is going through an administrative process, 21 they might not need an attorney, or they can maybe 22 file the complaint themselves. 23 If you're going to go through the court 24 system, oftentimes people feel intimidated, and they 25 believe that they need -- they need attorneys. 50 1 If they decide to go through the 2 administrative process with DHR, do you think we 3 should toll the statute of limitations, that they 4 can then file claims in state court, to actually 5 give them an opportunity to really have their 6 grievances heard? 7 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: Should we toll the 8 stat -- let me make sure I understand it. 9 Would you mind repeating that? 10 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMOTAS: Yes. 11 Should we -- if somebody decides to go 12 through the administrative process with DHR, should 13 the time frame that it takes to go through that 14 process be looped on to the amount of time they can 15 file a claim in state court? 16 In other words, if it takes 180 days, 17 ideally, or if it takes two years, because 18 sometimes, you know, as we know from the testimony 19 that you submitted, it takes longer, should their 20 time not run out to actually go to state court and 21 file a claim if they're actually able to secure an 22 attorney? 23 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: That's a tough one. 24 They have three years to go to court. That's 25 a good amount of time. 51 1 I think -- I think it's an issue of, you have 2 to pick your forum. 3 But, again, the way the law is currently 4 written, they have a year for us, and they have 5 three years to go to court. 6 The way it is currently written, we enforce 7 it. 8 If changes are to be made, then we will -- we 9 will enforce them. 10 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMOTAS: Thank you. 11 SENATOR BIAGGI: Senator Gounardes. 12 SENATOR GOUNARDES: Thank you very much. 13 I have -- 14 SENATOR BIAGGI: Excuse me, I'm so sorry. 15 Pardon my interruption. 16 We have been joined by Senator James Skoufis, 17 my other co-chair. 18 Sorry, Senator Gounardes. 19 SENATOR GOUNARDES: Okay. Anything for 20 Senator Skoufis. 21 [Laughter.] 22 SENATOR GOUNARDES: Thank you very much for 23 your testimony this morning. 24 I want to start with some questions for DHR. 25 You said that, of all the cases you received, 52 1 that you invest -- you received, and then you closed 2 out, 25 percent of them in sexual-harassment cases, 3 complaints filed, had probable cause to move on to a 4 hearing. Is that right? 5 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Correct. 6 SENATOR GOUNARDES: The non-sexual harassment 7 cases, what's the percentage of cases that you've 8 investigated that result in the probable cause -- 9 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: For the past -- since 10 2016, they have been hovering around 10 to 12 11 percent. 12 SENATOR GOUNARDES: So the sexual-harassment 13 complaints have a higher rate of probable-cause 14 findings? 15 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Correct. 16 SENATOR GOUNARDES: Okay. Thank you. 17 What is the -- after a cause of probable -- 18 after a finding of probable cause is made, what's 19 the time window for a hearing in which a complainant 20 gets the hearing at that point? 21 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Okay. 22 SENATOR GOUNARDES: Can you walk us through 23 that? 24 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Absolutely. 25 SENATOR GOUNARDES: Average time? 53 1 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: So -- just so you know 2 the process: 3 In all cases but for housing cases, once 4 there is a determination of probable cause, again, 5 all cases but housing cases will be scheduled for a 6 prehearing settlement conference. 7 During that time, the complainant, if they 8 have a private attorney, they will be on there. If 9 not, a division attorney is assigned. 10 An administrative law judge is on the call. 11 She run -- she or he runs the call, as well as the 12 respondent and the respondent's attorney. 13 That usually is scheduled about four weeks 14 after a probable-cause determination. 15 If there is a settlement, the case will come 16 off the calendar, and the attorneys will reduce it 17 into writing. 18 And once the parties sign off on it, the 19 division attorney will send it to the administrative 20 law judge, who will review it, okay it, and then 21 it's sent to the commissioner to sign off on an 22 order. 23 However, if there isn't a settlement, the 24 case will then be scheduled for a public hearing, 25 and that's, usually, anywhere between two to 54 1 three months after the prehearing settlement 2 conference. 3 SENATOR GOUNARDES: And in those cases, if it 4 gets to the hearing, is the preliminary finding of 5 probable cause given any additional weight to the -- 6 to the judge, or is it a -- is it basically like 7 starting from scratch again, to (indiscernible 8 cross-talking --) 9 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: It's a de novo hearing. 10 SENATOR GOUNARDES: It's a de novo hearing? 11 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: Yes. 12 SENATOR GOUNARDES: So it's kind of like 13 another bite at the apple, you know, to kind of have 14 a fresh start, for both the complainant and the 15 alleged harasser? 16 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: They put on their 17 evidence anew, yes. 18 SENATOR GOUNARDES: Okay. 19 In what percentage of cases that you receive, 20 that you make a determination on, can you kind of 21 walk us through how many of the cases you're able to 22 make a probable-cause determination on without doing 23 any additional fact finding? 24 In other words, how many cases do you just 25 get a complaint, you talk to the alleged harasser, 55 1 give the complainant a chance to rebut, and then 2 make a closing? 3 Or, how much time -- in what cases do you 4 actually go beyond the back-and-forth, to come to a 5 conclusion? 6 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: So I can't give you an 7 actual number for that. 8 There are cases where they're pretty 9 straightforward and we can just move forward pretty 10 quickly. 11 However, each investigation is obviously done 12 on a case-by-case basis. All of the cases are 13 fact-specific. 14 And our investigations are done using tools 15 at the discretion of the regional director. 16 So some cases require one- and two-party 17 conferences; some don't. 18 Some cases require additional requests for 19 information; some don't. 20 Site visits as well. 21 I don't have exact numbers for which ones 22 kind of go through the process because, they're so 23 good, that we have that, you know, piece of 24 evidence, where the alleged harasser is saying, you 25 know, X, Y, Z, and we're good to go within, you 56 1 know, two or three weeks. 2 SENATOR GOUNARDES: Got you. 3 Okay, thank you. 4 And I guess this question is -- sorry, one 5 more question for DHR, and then a question for both. 6 You said that you have a 62 percent increase 7 in the number of complaints that have been received? 8 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: 62 percent increase in 9 sexual-harassment filings since 2016. So that's, 10 from 2016 to 2018, the filings for sexual-harassment 11 complaints have increased by 62 percent. 12 Correct. 13 SENATOR GOUNARDES: Has your budget increased 14 by any reasonable amount in that time window as well 15 to process those? 16 I know there was a similar question raised on 17 the Assembly side about more resources. 18 But if you have -- that seems like a pretty 19 dramatic increase. 20 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: It definitely is a 21 pretty dramatic -- 22 SENATOR GOUNARDES: Have you received any 23 additional support -- budgetary support to kind of 24 help accommodate? 25 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: I'd have to speak to my 57 1 finance director about that. 2 SENATOR GOUNARDES: Okay. Thank you. 3 I guess for both DHR and the city commission, 4 what -- are the investigators that you have, are 5 they trained in, you know, kind of, dealing with 6 trauma victims, when they are interviewing and 7 taking complaints, and interviewing complainants, 8 about these cases? 9 D.C. DANA SUSSMAN: So we've have partnered 10 with the Mayor's office to end gender-based 11 discrim -- gender-based violence -- domestic and 12 gender-based violence, to train our staff. They 13 provide a pretty comprehensive victim-centered and 14 trauma-informed training to City employees. 15 And so we partner with them to get our staff 16 trained. 17 I think the next upcoming training is this 18 summer. 19 And one of the benefits of having the 20 gender-based harassment unit, is we have individuals 21 who are regularly working with people who are coming 22 out of or are currently in very stressful, 23 emotionally-charged, and, in many cases, devastating 24 situations. 25 And so they are particularly well positioned 58 1 to handle those cases. 2 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: All of our investigators 3 are trained thoroughly in conducting confidential 4 investigations. 5 And our regional director has been trained 6 specifically in conducting sexual-harassment 7 investigations, so she does train her staff. 8 SENATOR GOUNARDES: When we held our last 9 hearing in February, we heard from a different 10 agency, JCOPE, in which they said that it's, you 11 know, common for them to ask complainants about 12 their prior sexual history at the invest -- at the 13 complaint state, as a potential rebuttal for 14 defenses raised later on. 15 Is that a practice that either of your 16 agencies engage in when you are taking complaints or 17 doing preliminary investigations or interviews. 18 D.C. DANA SUSSMAN: I am not aware of that 19 practice. 20 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: I am not aware of that 21 practice either. 22 SENATOR GOUNARDES: Thank you. 23 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: We've also been joined 24 by Assemblywoman Linda Rosenthal. 25 For the next question, 59 1 Assemblywoman Rebecca Seawright. 2 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SEAWRIGHT: That you for your 3 testimony. 4 I replaced a legislator that was a harasser. 5 And as a young staff member, I was sexually 6 harassed by a state legislator. 7 I have a question. 8 Do you have recommendations for legislation 9 that would assist you in your enforcement actions? 10 D.C. DANA SUSSMAN: I -- from the City's 11 position, we are -- you know, we are in the process 12 of implementing a package of bills from last year, 13 including the extension of the statute of 14 limitations for gender-based harassment claims, from 15 one year, to three years. 16 And so I think the work that we're doing to 17 implement that bill package has been informative, 18 and I think we're seeing the benefits of those new 19 laws, and increased awareness around the commission, 20 through that bill package. 21 So, I don't have any specific recommendations 22 to share, other than to share the experience that 23 we've had at the city level. 24 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: I would say, as to DHR, 25 you know, we're neutral, we're impartial, and we're 60 1 an enforcement agency. We're not an advisory 2 agency. 3 However you decide as legislators to change 4 the law, we will definitely enforce it. 5 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SEAWRIGHT: Thank you. 6 SENATOR BIAGGI: Senator Liu? 7 SENATOR LIU: Thank you, Madam Chair. 8 I -- I appreciate these wonderful individuals 9 for attending our hearing and answering questions. 10 You know when -- when your superiors put you 11 in this position, it's potentially unpleasant. 12 And so let me ask you not to take anything 13 personally. Okay? 14 But I'm listening to this back-and-forth. 15 I'm listening to the testimony from the State 16 Division of Human Rights. 17 And I will say that I really appreciate the 18 City's Division of Human Rights testimony. 19 But the testimony that the State is giving 20 here, it's all about how proud you are, how happy 21 you are about the work that you do, how efficient 22 you do things. 23 It's as if there are no problems whatsoever. 24 And then you answer the questions from my 25 fellow legislators here. They're asking you 61 1 specific things, and sometimes you just sound 2 defensive. 3 So my -- and your testimony, towards the end, 4 at least I'm kind of happy that you at least say, 5 your -- "the division is also committed to ending 6 sexual harassment and other forms of discrimination 7 via outreach and education." 8 So, are you committed to enforcing the law as 9 it currently is written, or are you truly enfor -- 10 are you truly committed to ending sexual harassment 11 and other forms of discrimination? 12 See, the City's testimony specifically says 13 that they think the law should be changed, and cites 14 a specific example, such has, "correcting the 15 decades of case law establishing unnecessarily high, 16 severe, or pervasive standard, and explicitly 17 rejecting the Faragher-Ellerth affirmative defense." 18 They give examples of how the City thinks 19 they should -- the state law should change. 20 You don't cite any examples. You just talk 21 about how well the division has been doing. 22 Even though it is clearly a new day, the laws 23 haven't changed very much. 24 We haven't had a hearing until our co-chairs 25 here put together something a few months ago. 62 1 And it's like the division of -- the State 2 Division of Human Rights is, like, everything is 3 fine and dandy. 4 Am I mischaracterizing you? 5 I certainly hope I am. 6 Maybe you can clarify some of your testimony 7 and the responses that you've given to questions 8 from these legislators? 9 Or maybe I can be specific. 10 Is there one law, or, maybe one of our 11 proposed bills, about a dozen proposed bills, that 12 the State Division of Human Rights would like to see 13 enacted? 14 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: Well, I would say, 15 I don't take it personal. 16 SENATOR LIU: Okay. 17 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: That is -- 18 SENATOR LIU: Good. And it is -- 19 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: -- that is -- we'll 20 start from there. 21 SENATOR LIU: -- not meant personally. 22 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: Right, we'll start from 23 there. 24 But, again, if we're to remain neutral, and 25 enforce the laws as we are, if any opinion that we 63 1 gave would be inappropriate, right, because it takes 2 away from that. 3 So, again, while you would like us to say any 4 recommendations I'd have to stand by, in order to 5 remain neutral, we can't. 6 SENATOR LIU: Well, you know what? I've 7 heard much testimony from police commissioners, from 8 commissioners of other agencies, that are sworn to 9 uphold the laws as it -- laws as they currently are, 10 but have no hesitation to suggest changes or 11 improvements to current law. 12 And if you truly are committed to ending 13 sexual harassment and other forms of discrimination, 14 as per your testimony, there's got to be some kind 15 of change. 16 I mean -- either everything is fine and 17 dandy, or there's got to be some kind change that 18 you think would make sense. 19 So once again, the question is: Is there at 20 least one of these bills that you think would make 21 sense? 22 We've had -- we've got about a dozen bills on 23 the docket. Is there at least one that make sense? 24 The City cites four specific areas. 25 I have named two of the four specific areas 64 1 that they've mentioned. 2 Is there one? 3 Are you -- even in response to 4 Chairman Crespo's question about pervas -- pervas -- 5 "severe and pervasive," you kind of said that, oh, 6 it's not really -- to me, it sounded like you didn't 7 think it was necessary for the State to adopt that 8 kind of standard. 9 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: Well, it's definitely 10 not our position, and I hope you don't take this 11 personally, but I'm going to stand by my answer. 12 It is my belief that if any recommendation on 13 potential changes to the law, or pending 14 legislation, would be inappropriate. 15 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Can I -- I'm sorry. 16 SENATOR LIU: (Nods head) Yeah. 17 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Can I just add, 18 without -- again, I have to agree, and say, again, 19 what Deputy Commissioner Franco says, we can't say 20 anything specific. We enforce the law; we don't 21 make the law. 22 But I also want to respond to the assertion 23 that we think everything is fine and dandy. 24 We don't. 25 We enforce the oldest human rights law in the 65 1 country, and we aggressively enforce it. But we 2 know that discrimination exists, and that an 3 aggressive approach is required. 4 And it has taken a long time for us to get 5 here. 6 And we want to work with all of you to 7 strengthen the protections that exist, and that's 8 why we're here. 9 But it's a multi-prong approach that we need. 10 There's a culture shift going on right now. 11 But -- but we're -- we're getting there, but 12 we're not there. 13 And that just doesn't go for sexual 14 harassment. 15 You know, the discrimination, in and of 16 itself, is still existing. 17 Black people are still getting fired from 18 jobs. People on public assistance are still losing 19 their homes. People in wheelchairs still can't get 20 into restaurants. 21 We don't think that things are fine and dandy 22 by any stretch of the imagination. 23 SENATOR LIU: Those forms of discrimination 24 are -- are terrible -- 25 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Absolutely. 66 1 SENATOR LIU: -- and you should continue the 2 enforcement actions against those kinds of 3 discrimination. 4 But there is a heightened awareness of sexual 5 harassment. 6 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Yes. 7 SENATOR LIU: And you can't be doing the same 8 things as usual. It's not business as usual. You 9 have to change some of the approaches. 10 And working with the legislative body, 11 I think is fine. 12 Maybe, as deputy commissioners, I will allow 13 this. Maybe as deputy commissioners you're not 14 empowered to go beyond this testimony. 15 But I would encourage you to go back to your 16 commissioner, and send us some kind of feedback as 17 to: 18 Do you absolutely oppose all the bills that 19 we've proposed? 20 Or might there be one, two, perhaps a few 21 bills, that you think would make sense and would 22 help you do your job better? 23 The mission that you specifically cite in 24 your testimony, of ending -- of your commitment to 25 "ending sexual harassment and other forms 67 1 discrimination via outreach and education." 2 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Noted. Thank you. We 3 will. 4 SENATOR LIU: Thank you. 5 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: I want to acknowledge 6 we've been joined by Assemblyman Harvey Epstein, 7 who's off to the side beyond the column where I 8 can't see him. 9 [Laughter.] 10 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: But he's there, he's 11 there. 12 Assemblymember Quart. 13 ASSEMBLYMAN QUART: Good morning. 14 My questions are for Ms. Franco. 15 In your comments to Senator Liu's questions, 16 you said it is your job or your agency's job to 17 enforce the law, not write the law. 18 So let me ask you a couple questions about 19 enforcement. 20 If you can turn to page 3 of your testimony, 21 you talked about 172-day time period. 22 That's about a six-month time period, from a 23 complaint being registered, to a final 24 determination. 25 Is that correct? 68 1 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: I'm Franco, and it was 2 my testimony. 3 Yes, it's about six months. 4 ASSEMBLYMAN QUART: About six months. 5 Where in that timeline, generally, is the 6 probable-cause determination? 7 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: At about the end of it, 8 that's it's when -- the determination is made, the 9 172 days. 10 ASSEMBLYMAN QUART: So somewhere, month five, 11 month six, is that fair to say? 12 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Yes. 13 ASSEMBLYMAN QUART: What happens to the 14 complainant for the first five months while he or 15 she waits for adjudication? 16 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Well, we keep in touch 17 with the complainant, generally. They can contact 18 us. They know who's assigned to their case; the 19 investigator that's assigned to their case. 20 They can -- 21 ASSEMBLYMAN QUART: You keep in touch with 22 the complainant? 23 That's -- let me ask it a different way. 24 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Okay. 25 ASSEMBLYMAN QUART: What regulations exist, 69 1 what statutory -- what regulations exist under your 2 statutory mandate that allow you to prevent 3 irreparable harm from the complainant during that 4 five or six months while you wait to make -- while 5 you investigate, and then make a determination on 6 probable cause? 7 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: The only statutory 8 protection that exists is the anti-retaliation 9 protection that we have -- 10 ASSEMBLYMAN QUART: So there's no -- 11 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: -- where the respondent 12 is informed that, if they do retaliate against the 13 complainant for filing a complaint, an additional 14 action may be brought against them. 15 ASSEMBLYMAN QUART: So other than laws 16 against retaliate -- retaliatate (ph.) -- 17 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Retaliation. 18 ASSEMBLYMAN QUART: -- retaliatory laws -- 19 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Yes. 20 ASSEMBLYMAN QUART: -- statutes -- 21 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Yes. 22 ASSEMBLYMAN QUART: -- do any regulations 23 exist that allow you, as an agency, to take 24 preventive action within that 150-day time period to 25 prevent that complainant from a worsening condition, 70 1 an exacerbation, of why they came to you in the 2 first place? 3 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: Not that I'm aware of, 4 no. 5 ASSEMBLYMAN QUART: Do you think that would 6 be a welcomed area that we should legislate in, to 7 give you greater tools to prevent irreparable harm, 8 from someone who comes forth and complains, while 9 you investigate and make a determination on probable 10 cause? 11 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: That is something to be 12 considered. 13 ASSEMBLYMAN QUART: Thank you. 14 SENATOR BIAGGI: Before I hand the microphone 15 over to Senator Krueger, I just want to make one 16 comment about what Senator Liu had said. 17 You had made a comment about being neutral on 18 the cases. 19 But it is your job to not to be neutral on 20 the law. 21 In fact, as a former counsel and staffer in 22 Governor Cuomo's counsel's office, one of the things 23 I did, in fact, when the legislators ended their 24 session and the bills came to our desk, was I called 25 the agencies right away, and they weighed in on all 71 1 of the bills. 2 And, in fact, as a non-subject-matter expert 3 on many of the bills, the agencies were my allies 4 and my strongest supporters on those topics. 5 And without them, the bills wouldn't have 6 been able to have been passed. 7 And so I would actually disagree that you 8 can't be neutral. In fact, I would implore you to 9 not to be neutral, because you can't fully 10 effectuate your roles. 11 And we, as the Legislature, need your 12 opinions because, if not you, then who; who should 13 we go to? 14 Senator Krueger? 15 SENATOR KRUEGER: Thank you, Senator. 16 Oh, I think this is working. 17 Thank you. 18 So it's -- mine is follow-up on a whole 19 series of the questions. 20 So given the problem we're hearing -- two 21 parts of a problem: 22 One: Some employers saying, well, there are 23 good policies now. There's no reason anyone ever 24 have to go sue, because they report to someone and 25 it gets taken care of. 72 1 And then you have the reality that, because 2 we have the Faragher-Ellerth defense as a viable 3 employer stance regarding sexual harassment, if the 4 employee is just completely confused about what 5 harassment policy is, and where they're supposed to 6 go, and how they're supposed to report, that the 7 burden of proof falls on them, and they failed to 8 meet their responsibilities to report and complain 9 harassment. 10 So I want to ask the three of you: If you 11 were victims of sexual harassment, and you've 12 already answered that it's the person's 13 determination whether they go to courts or whether 14 they go to one of your agencies, if it was one of 15 you, would you go to your agency or would you go to 16 the courts? 17 D.C. DANA SUSSMAN: Well, it's hard to be 18 unbiased. 19 You know, I think that there -- there's 20 strengths to either -- or, there's reasons to choose 21 your venue. 22 I think what's important here, too, to 23 recognize is that, while the agencies enforce 24 their -- our own anti-discrimination laws, courts 25 are also interpreting these same laws. 73 1 So while the state division is committed to 2 interpreting the law quite broadly and protectively, 3 as is the commission, we have no say or influence 4 over state court judges or federal judges in how 5 they interpret the standards. 6 So these standards that you're debating today 7 will not just impact our work, or the state 8 division's work, but how judges interpret the laws. 9 And that's where we see the real stark case 10 law in which a City Human Rights Law claim survives 11 a motion to dismiss or a summary judgment, and a 12 State Human Rights Law claim does not, for the same 13 behavior, because one standard is so much -- is 14 higher than the other. 15 So I think that's an important thing to 16 recognize, that when you go to state court, you can 17 bring a City Human Rights Law claim, you can bring a 18 State Human Rights Law claim, but you may not 19 prevail on your State Human Rights Law claim as it 20 currently is interpreted by case law because the 21 standard is quite different. 22 I think it's about -- it's all -- it's very 23 much about resources, and I think it's also very 24 much about -- about how public the process is. 25 At the city commission, there's no public 74 1 filing. There is no online, you know, database 2 where you could search for someone's complaint. 3 That may happen some day, and, certainly, we 4 are subject to FOIL when the case is closed. 5 But, if you want to -- if -- when you file 6 with the commission, it's, essentially, a document 7 that you sign on that -- that an attorney drafts, 8 and it's served on the responding party. 9 So it's not -- you can make it public. It's 10 not as though anyone is prevented from making it 11 public. And the respondent will know. But it is 12 not, sort of, going to court and having it be in a 13 public forum in the same way. 14 So I think it's both about resources and it's 15 about how public you wish to be, and many other 16 factors. 17 But, I'll leave it at that. 18 SENATOR KRUEGER: Other lady? 19 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: Sure -- you want to go 20 ahead? Go on. 21 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Well, I would file with 22 my agency, given the timing of the investigations, 23 how quickly they are investigated; and the 24 probable-cause rate at 25 percent; and the fact that 25 I know that my staff is very well equipped to handle 75 1 these cases, and trained. 2 I believe that my agency is the best to 3 handle my claim. 4 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: For myself, speaking 5 from personal experience, I was the victim of 6 discrim -- of sexual harassment. I chose to file 7 with my employer first. Then I consulted with an 8 attorney, and took it from there. 9 SENATOR KRUEGER: So you're, all three, in a 10 situation also where you work for the agency that's 11 supposed to being overseeing these cases, but that 12 doesn't necessarily make you that different than 13 people I've heard from who work for -- who have 14 worked for the executive, agencies, or the 15 Legislature. 16 Or even, today, we had more exposures about 17 the Harvey Weinstein case, where you had people 18 working for very powerful people. 19 And we've already learned that you can't 20 necessarily do anything to protect them for five, 21 six months, even if you're taking the case. 22 I guess I don't understand why I wouldn't try 23 to go to a court to get resolution, rather than face 24 the problems inherent of going to an agency that is 25 overseen, or agencies that are overseen, by people 76 1 who may be the ones committing the crimes. 2 So I -- again, I do -- I don't want to have 3 not multiple options for people. 4 But I think, particularly because of the 5 failure to eliminate the Faragher-Ellerth defense, 6 we are putting victims between a rock and hard 7 place, where one or the other decision might be the 8 right one or the wrong one at that moment, but they 9 can just get caught in -- what's that sci-fi movie 10 loop, where you just -- 11 I don't -- I'm not good at sci-fi, so I'm 12 sorry I made the reference. 13 [Laughter.] 14 SENATOR KRUEGER: -- but you're just caught 15 in this loop. 16 OFF-CAMERA SPEAKER: Inception? 17 SENATOR KRUEGER: John Liu, do you -- 18 OFF-CAMERA SPEAKER: I think you're right. 19 SENATOR LIU: "Liu." It's not "Loop." 20 SENATOR KRUEGER: -- that loop -- okay, no, 21 I wasn't attacking you, John Liu. 22 "Loop." 23 [Laughter.] 24 SENATOR KRUEGER: My colleagues, it's very 25 hard to work with them. 77 1 [Laughter.] 2 SENATOR KRUEGER: Well, you get caught in a 3 loop, and you've got time frames, and you're not 4 allowed to do both. 5 And so I really think this is a critical part 6 of our assignment as a legislator, to figure out and 7 make sure that we aren't leaving victims in 8 different scenarios where neither option is really 9 the right option, and they're left hanging out 10 there, and they, potentially, can lose all their 11 rights and protections, because we didn't make the 12 law clear enough about what path is the correct path 13 to take to be protected, and to ensure that you have 14 rights, and that you don't end up losing your job 15 when someone else was at fault. 16 So I think that's what I'm struggling to try 17 to get an understanding of today from you all. 18 Thank you. 19 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Assemblywoman Walker. 20 ASSEMBLYWOMAN WALKER: Thank you to our 21 Co-Chairs, and to the witnesses here today for your 22 testimony. 23 One of the -- I guess, one of the major 24 concerns that I have with respect to these issues 25 are regarding nondisclosure agreements. 78 1 And I understand now that these are 2 instruments that are frowned upon. 3 And, you know, we hope, that when litigants 4 are coming to their settlement arrangements, that 5 they are instruments that are no longer being 6 utilized. 7 When parties are settling, do you have an 8 opportunity to review their settlement agreements in 9 order to ensure that NDAs are not used either 10 affirmatively or in a -- or in a nondescript manner? 11 D.C. DANA SUSSMAN: When cases are resolved 12 through the commission process and a conciliation 13 agreement is negotiated, that's an agreement between 14 the complainant, the respondent, and commission. 15 There is no nondisclosure provision. It's against 16 the public interest. 17 The commission is not prevented from talking 18 about the case, the complainant or the respondent 19 are not prevented from talking about the case. 20 Parties can negotiate -- request to remove 21 their case from our office and negotiate their own 22 settlement. 23 And, currently, that could involve, from what 24 I understand, nondisclosure agreements in a sort of 25 private settlement posture. 79 1 The commission still retains the ability to 2 continue the investigation of the workplace. 3 If we understand that this is not an isolated 4 situation, we can continue to work to ensure 5 training; monitoring; potentially, civil penalties. 6 We can reach out to see if there are other victims. 7 But if the parties -- if the two parties 8 specifically remove the case to negotiate their own 9 resolution, there may be an NDA in there. 10 But cases that are resolved through the 11 commission, there is no nondisclosure provisions in 12 those agreements. 13 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: With the State, where 14 there is a settlement agreement done at the regional 15 level, which is during the investigative stage, the 16 division is a party to that agreement, so we review 17 all the provisions. And the NDA is only a part or a 18 separate agreement at the -- if it's the 19 complainant's preference. 20 As with the city commission, if the 21 complainant and the respondent wish to enter into a 22 private agreement, we are not a party to that, and 23 that is a separate issue. 24 And we let them know that we cannot enforce 25 that. 80 1 So if the respondent agrees to do something, 2 and then they fail to do it, we cannot enforce that. 3 So with agreements where the case is settled 4 before a determination is made, you know, before the 5 investigation is completed, yes, we make sure that 6 there are no NDAs in there, unless the complainant 7 wants it. 8 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: It's the same for post 9 determination as well, it really is the 10 complainant's preference. 11 The assigned division attorney explains to 12 them the ramifications of having one in or not 13 having one in. 14 But, again, it is the complainant's 15 preference that dictates it. 16 ASSEMBLYWOMAN WALKER: So even in -- even in 17 an instant, because I believe I read that if a 18 complainant does not have an attorney, then the 19 agency provides them an attorney? Is that -- 20 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: That is correct, and 21 that's after there is a post determination. 22 So for the settlement conferences, post 23 determination, as well as the hearing, an attorney 24 is assigned to the case. 25 ASSEMBLYWOMAN WALKER: So, ultimately, the 81 1 attorney that's assigned has an ability to have a 2 conversation with the complainant about NDAs, or 3 encourage them or discourage them, or whatever; but, 4 either way, they still have the ability to enter 5 into these types of agreements on behalf of a 6 complainant? 7 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: Again, the attorneys 8 do -- when they do reach a settlement in principle, 9 and, let's say, and they reduce it to writing, we do 10 send the documents to the complainant. We go 11 through each -- all the terms of the settlement, 12 explain each term to them, including a potential 13 confidentiality agreement, and explain what would 14 happen if they agree to it, and what they don't if 15 they didn't agree to it. 16 ASSEMBLYWOMAN WALKER: Have there been 17 instances where perhaps someone agreed to a 18 nondisclosure agreement, and then came back again to 19 the agency, to say, you know, I made a mistake; or, 20 you know, I want to -- you know, I want say 21 something, I want to tell someone something? 22 Have you seen them sort of, you know, recant, 23 I guess, their feelings with respect to entering 24 into such an agreements? 25 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: Not that I am aware of. 82 1 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: I have not been made 2 aware of any, any of those instances. 3 ASSEMBLYWOMAN WALKER: Do you believe that 4 we, as a state, should allow liquidated damages if a 5 victim decides to speak about their experiences? 6 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: I'm sorry, can you 7 repeat that one more time? 8 ASSEMBLYWOMAN WALKER: Do you believe, as a 9 state, that we should allow liquidated damages if a 10 victim decides to speak about their experiences with 11 re -- when there is an NDA agreement established? 12 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: I've never had to deal 13 with that, so I'm thinking about it a second. I've 14 never had that issue brought to me. 15 So, if you could just give me a moment. 16 ASSEMBLYWOMAN WALKER: Perhaps because 17 there's an NDA? 18 [Laughter.] 19 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: Not right now. 20 I mean, it's something to be considered, but, 21 I take no position on that. 22 ASSEMBLYWOMAN WALKER: Say that again? 23 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: I said, it's something 24 to be considered, but, you know, having not thought 25 about that, I can't really, like, give an informed 83 1 opinion about it, not knowing the pros and the cons, 2 and having had time to think about it. 3 ASSEMBLYWOMAN WALKER: I guess it's just sort 4 in the era of, you know, time's up, and, you know, 5 and -- and encouraging individuals who have gone 6 through these experiences to -- to come out, and 7 utilize their story to help other people who are 8 going through them. 9 Or, in many instances, it's therapeutic just 10 for themselves, to be able to have a forum by which 11 they are able to engage about their experiences, not 12 just with the sexual assault or harassment that 13 they've gone through, but, also, as -- you know, to 14 speak about their experiences through the process, 15 even with your agencies. 16 So -- so it's just -- you know, I guess my 17 concern is, is that we are, as a state, sort of 18 allowing for, I don't know, the victimization of an 19 individual to be muted. 20 And so I'm just trying to figure out, like, 21 how, or what is it that we can do, in order to 22 encourage more individuals to come forward, as 23 opposed to saying, that there's this forum that's 24 available to you to adjudicate your claims, but once 25 you go through the process, don't ever talk about 84 1 this again. 2 And, I mean, it's something that happens in 3 families. 4 And I just don't think that it's something 5 that should -- it happens in church, it happens in 6 schools, it happens in communities. 7 And I just don't think that it's something 8 that we should be allowing, condoning, and, also, as 9 in the case of the attorneys, really encouraging 10 someone in their professional lives and in their 11 careers to be supportive of. 12 So those are just my thoughts. 13 And, thank you. 14 SENATOR BIAGGI: Senator Carlucci. 15 SENATOR CARLUCCI: Thank you. 16 I want to thank the Co-Chairs, and thank you 17 Commissioner Sussman, and Commissioners Franco and 18 Martinez, for testifying here today. 19 And I share my colleagues' sentiment, and the 20 frustration, that we want to work together to pass 21 important legislation. And we're -- we're excited 22 about a package of legislation put forth by 23 Senator Biaggi, that we believe will truly make an 24 impact in helping and protect survivors. 25 And to that effort, I'll ask a few questions, 85 1 just to see what guidance we could get. 2 You know, some of the alarming things that 3 stand out, of many, but one I'll focus in on, in 4 terms of statute of limitations, when we talk about 5 the "one year," and I know it was asked by some of 6 my colleagues this morning, what would be some of 7 the unforeseen consequences of extending the statute 8 of limitations? 9 And I know it was said that, as time passes, 10 memories become foggy, not as clear, and that's 11 understandable; or, that documents might not exist 12 anymore. 13 What I'm thinking about is where the memory 14 is clear three years later, or 12 -- 13 months 15 later, the documents still are intact, and we've 16 totally shut the door. 17 That concerns me, and I think it concerns 18 many members here today, and looking to extend that 19 statute of limitations. 20 Could you give us any type of guidance in 21 that direction, or things that we should be 22 concerned about? 23 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Well, if the statute of 24 limitations were to be extended, I think, assuming 25 we could actually find the respondent, and other 86 1 witnesses, then more complaints would be filed. 2 Obviously, you know, you'd be opening the door to 3 additional complaints. 4 But I think, as Commissioner Franco said 5 before, the concern, and this is a concern in 6 litigation as well, is that, right, memories do go 7 stale; respondents go out of business, people die. 8 It's not that, you know, we're looking to 9 limit the amount of complaints that we get. That's 10 not the case at all, we're not doing that. 11 It's just that this is -- this is the amount 12 of time that we've been given. 13 But, by giving, you know, the additional 14 time, you're right, we would be getting more 15 complaints. The numbers wouldn't necessarily go up 16 with probable-cause rates. We would just be getting 17 more complaints. 18 But, again, I can't take a position on that. 19 But if you were to do that, we would 20 absolutely be open to more investigations. 21 SENATOR CARLUCCI: So I'm just trying to 22 understand that -- 23 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Sure. 24 SENATOR CARLUCCI: -- some of the concerns 25 would be, yes, you would be dealing with a bigger 87 1 caseload. 2 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Absolutely bigger 3 caseload. 4 SENATOR CARLUCCI: That -- 5 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Resources. 6 SENATOR CARLUCCI: -- but any of these 7 issues, like, a business going out of business -- 8 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Yes. 9 SENATOR CARLUCCI: -- or someone passing 10 away, I mean, that could happen at any time. 11 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: At any time, yes. 12 But, then, how do we redress the complainant 13 when that happens -- 14 SENATOR CARLUCCI: Well, how do you do it 15 now? 16 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: -- if the respondent 17 dies -- 18 We can't, unfortunately. 19 So the three years doesn't -- 20 SENATOR CARLUCCI: Just to give that 21 opportunity. 22 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: -- sure, absolutely, the 23 person is able to file the complaint, at least. 24 But it's the same thing, right, with the 25 "one year," if -- 88 1 SENATOR CARLUCCI: You know -- 2 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: -- go ahead, please. 3 SENATOR CARLUCCI: -- well, I was just moving 4 on, unless you had any other -- 5 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: No, no, no. Please. 6 SENATOR CARLUCCI: When we talk about the 7 average determination, with 180 days, and -- or 8 172 days, and we've seen the increase in the past 9 year, has that number increased in the past year, or 10 has that been the standard for the past few years? 11 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: I'm sorry, has what 12 number increased? 13 SENATOR CARLUCCI: You -- it says, 14 "Currently, 97 percent of claims investigated by DHR 15 are completed and determinations are made within 16 180 days." 17 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Correct. 18 SENATOR CARLUCCI: And we know that, as was 19 stated earlier, since 2016 -- 20 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Yes. 21 SENATOR CARLUCCI: -- the amount of 22 complaints have increased by over 60 percent. 23 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Yes. 24 SENATOR CARLUCCI: And so I'm just trying to 25 understand that -- has that completion time of 89 1 180 days, has that increased since 2016, or has that 2 stayed about the same? 3 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: No, the -- the 172 days 4 you're asking, has it increased? 5 I think that's been -- that's been pretty 6 steady. We've been holding -- we've been doing very 7 well with our investigation times -- 8 SENATOR CARLUCCI: Okay. 9 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: -- (indiscernible 10 cross-talking). 11 SENATOR CARLUCCI: And then, in there, "We 12 take into consideration that, if the investigator 13 finds no probable cause, or lack of jurisdiction, 14 that the complaint is dismissed." 15 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Yes. 16 SENATOR CARLUCCI: And, obviously, that's 17 understandable. 18 Probable cause would take some time to 19 investigate, and 180 days sounds appropriate. 20 When we talk about lack of jurisdiction -- 21 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Yes. 22 SENATOR CARLUCCI: -- how long does that, 23 usually, typically take? 24 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: It depends on the 25 circumstances. It could take a lot less time. 90 1 I don't have the actual average number for 2 LOJs, but we can safely say it takes less time 3 (inaudible). 4 SENATOR CARLUCCI: What would be an example 5 of a lack of jurisdiction? 6 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: What's an easy one. 7 The respondent is outside of the state. 8 SENATOR CARLUCCI: Okay. And I'm just trying 9 to figure out, because I think that would be simple 10 to figure out -- 11 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Yes, yes. 12 SENATOR CARLUCCI: -- and it wouldn't take 13 180 days. 14 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Yes. 15 SENATOR CARLUCCI: Okay. 16 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Yeah. 17 Or we are outside of the statute of 18 limitations. 19 SENATOR CARLUCCI: And that's, jurisdiction 20 includes the statute of limitations? 21 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Yes. 22 SENATOR CARLUCCI: Do you have any ideas of 23 how many reports are filed each year that are 24 actually outside the statute of limitations, or are 25 you trying to deny those from even being filed in 91 1 the first place? 2 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: No, we take all 3 complaints. We never turn anyone away. 4 But I don't have the number regarding how 5 many cases come in -- 6 SENATOR CARLUCCI: If it's possible to get -- 7 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: -- over the one year. 8 SENATOR CARLUCCI: -- that information, that 9 would be helpful. 10 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Sure. 11 SENATOR CARLUCCI: And then when there is the 12 lack of jurisdiction, and let's say it's not because 13 of statute of limitations, but it's because it's 14 actual jurisdiction, but there might possibly be a 15 claim that is eligible to be filed, are you able to 16 walk that person through the process of what they do 17 if it's not within your jurisdiction? 18 Is there any mechanism to help them file the 19 appropriate complaint, maybe with another 20 jurisdiction? 21 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Yes. 22 So we have, when a complainant comes in to 23 file the complaint, or even when they call in to 24 inquire about the process, we will let them know -- 25 we'll ask them about the facts of their case, and 92 1 we'll let them know, if they don't -- if they can't 2 file a complaint, or, if they don't want to pursue 3 our process, these are the other available avenues 4 for them. And then we can give them their phone 5 number as well. 6 We do give them their information. 7 SENATOR CARLUCCI: And then just one last 8 question: When there is a determination of probable 9 cause and the case is moving forward, do you have an 10 idea of what percentage of people are represented by 11 private counsel as opposed to you providing counsel? 12 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: I don't -- when they 13 file the complaint? 14 SENATOR CARLUCCI: No, actual -- after 15 probable cause. 16 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Post probable cause? 17 SENATOR CARLUCCI: Yeah. 18 SENATOR BIAGGI: I don't have that number 19 with us, but we can get that to you. 20 SENATOR CARLUCCI: Okay. 21 Okay, thank you. 22 Thank you, Chairman. 23 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Assemblywoman Simon. 24 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMON: Yes, thank you. 25 Okay, thank you very much. 93 1 I have a couple of quick questions for you. 2 Now, the State has already commented about 3 the -- when the statute of limitations begins to 4 run; it's the last discriminatory act. 5 I just wanted to ask the City, is that also 6 the case? 7 D.C. DANA SUSSMAN: That's correct, the last 8 discriminatory act. 9 And we can reach back further in time if it's 10 a continuing violation, a pattern or practice of 11 behavior. 12 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMON: And you're taking a 13 liberal view of a "continuing violation"? 14 D.C. DANA SUSSMAN: We do, yes. 15 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMON: Okay. 16 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: We do as well at the 17 State. 18 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMON: Okay. 19 Well, that's good to know. 20 It would be nice if the feds did the same 21 thing. 22 The other -- another question I have is: Do 23 you have any data with regard to the industries from 24 which these complaints emanate? 25 So, for example, higher education, there are 94 1 a lot of employment cases, but also other forms of 2 harassment cases, within institutions of higher 3 education, which are, actually, fairly major 4 employers in a whole host of fields. 5 So I'm particularly curious about higher 6 education, for some other reasons. 7 And I'm curious whether you have that data? 8 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: Do not have that data 9 with us. 10 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMON: Do you collect that 11 type of data? 12 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: Well, we just actually 13 got back jurisdiction for the public schools. 14 So when you say "higher education," are you 15 talking about the colleges? 16 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMON: Colleges and 17 universities. 18 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: It may be possible for 19 us to pull that kind of data. 20 So when I go back, I will find out if it can 21 be. 22 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMON: Wonderful; if you do 23 have the data, I would like to see that. 24 And then the other question I have for the 25 State: 95 1 We've talked a little bit about matters 2 relating to the budget. 3 And last year I know, in the budget, we 4 provided funding for three additional attorneys, 5 I believe, because we were expanding the policies 6 and requiring the training, and anticipated that 7 there would be more complaints. 8 My question is: What about investigators? 9 Do you need investigators? 10 How many more investigators? 11 I've heard various reports from colleagues 12 who are practicing in the field, that they believe 13 more investigators are needed. 14 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Do you want my wish 15 list? 16 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMON: Yes. 17 [Laughter.] 18 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Well, to start with, 19 I would love an additional investigator in every 20 regional office, absolutely. 21 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMON: There's 13 regional 22 offices? Is that -- 23 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: There's 12 regional 24 offices around the state, yeah. 25 I think that would be highly beneficial for 96 1 our staff, to kind ease the caseload for everyone. 2 Ultimately, my wish list is to open 3 additional regional offices as well. 4 But I -- I think that, you know, the more -- 5 and I'm sure we'll talk about the outreach in 6 education that we do. 7 The more that we do outreach and education, 8 and we do -- we have a new commissioner, who has big 9 plans for outreach and education in the future. 10 And the more outreach and education that we 11 do, I have a feeling that our 6,000 is going to 12 skyrocket. 13 So, I might be better off asking for two or 14 three additional investigators in every office right 15 now, if I could predict the future. 16 We are planning robust outreach and education 17 all over the state, in hard-to-reach areas, 18 hard-to-reach populations, that -- where there are 19 individuals that maybe, necessarily, haven't been 20 made aware of our process, and who should be made 21 aware. 22 So, you know, with this 6,000 complaints that 23 we get every year, and this 62 percent increase, 24 I absolutely expect that that will continue to go 25 up. 97 1 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMON: I just, yesterday, was 2 speaking with a group of -- who represents 3 merchants, for example, in a business-improvement 4 district. And many of them are small employers, 5 some of them are larger employers. And they're all 6 very confused about the sexual-harassment 7 provisions. 8 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Right. 9 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMON: And were -- they have, 10 in fact, engaged someone to do training, and so 11 they've been through training. 12 But it's very difficult, often, to get shop 13 owners, for example, to participate in these 14 programs because they can't leave their businesses 15 to do that. 16 And they expressed an interest to have more 17 robust communications from the State and the City 18 with regard to these requirements, so that they 19 could better help their members comply with the law. 20 So I just wanted to throw that out there for 21 your consideration. 22 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Thank you. 23 And that's exactly the kind of information 24 that we want to know, so that we can actually go out 25 there and engage those different organizations. 98 1 That's very helpful. 2 D.C. DANA SUSSMAN: And just from the City 3 side, we will be sending out mailers to all 4 department of finance-identified businesses, with a 5 focus on small businesses, in English and Spanish, 6 which lays out all of the new City requirements, 7 including providing the English and Spanish poster 8 that must go up in all businesses, and links to the 9 online training that we have, which I mentioned is 10 optimized for smartphone use. 11 We anticipate people will take it on phones, 12 crowd around one screen together, take it together, 13 which is totally compliant. 14 And so we're trying to make -- we understand 15 and recognize that laws are changing rapidly. Very 16 few small businesses have access to legal counsel to 17 guide them. 18 And that we want to work with small 19 businesses, and provide as much information as we 20 can, given the resources, to get them up to speed. 21 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMON: And if I may, just -- 22 and this will be my last point, one of the concerns 23 that was expressed to me yesterday in this meeting, 24 was that the department of finance's records for the 25 addresses of owners, for example, that they would 99 1 send this information to, are hopelessly out of 2 date. And that the bids are getting a lot of 3 returned address -- returned mail, and have no idea 4 how to reach out to the owners. 5 And so perhaps you might encourage the 6 department of finance to step up some efforts to 7 clarify their records. 8 D.C. DANA SUSSMAN: That's helpful. Thank 9 you. 10 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMON: Thank you. 11 SENATOR BIAGGI: Senator Mayer. 12 SENATOR MAYER: Thank you. 13 I have a question for the division of human 14 right's staff. 15 Within your practice, if you get a complaint 16 that -- while the person may come to you, thinking 17 it belongs in your bailiwick, upon review, it is a 18 potential criminal action, or, potentially, a 19 criminal action, by the accused, do you ever refer 20 matters to the district attorney of the county in 21 which this occurs? 22 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: It's our practice, if 23 we do come across that -- it's not often that I have 24 come across it -- but we do, depending on what the 25 facts are, it could be that I will call the district 100 1 attorney's office and let them know, or, I will 2 refer it to -- I will inform the complainant that 3 they should call the district attorney's office. 4 SENATOR MAYER: Do you know how many times 5 the division has referred matters to the district 6 attorney's office in the past year? 7 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: In my own experience, 8 just once. 9 SENATOR MAYER: Would you support legislation 10 that explicitly directed the division to report 11 potential criminal acts to the district attorney? 12 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: It's our practice to do 13 that. 14 SENATOR MAYER: Yeah, but not -- I'm sorry. 15 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: Whether or not 16 legislation is warranted -- 17 SENATOR MAYER: I'm asking you -- 18 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: -- I don't know, but it 19 is our practice. 20 SENATOR MAYER: -- as someone who gets these 21 complaints. 22 This is important. 23 Someone might come to me and say, This 24 happened. I'm going to call the division of human 25 rights. 101 1 That's all they know. They don't really know 2 it may be criminal. 3 You are the experts in the field. 4 I'm asking if it would be helpful. 5 I understand your reluctance to talk about 6 any legislation, which I would acknowledge with my 7 colleague Senator Liu, that Executive Law 290, 8 subdivision 3, and, Article 15 of the Human Rights 9 Law, makes clear the division is not a neutral 10 player. It has a function and a mission. 11 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: Poor choice of words 12 I guess I used earlier today. So I apologize. 13 SENATOR MAYER: Yes. 14 But that being said, this agency, and I've 15 been around long enough to know, was established 16 with the mission of addressing discrimination in 17 New York State. 18 So I would respectfully suggest that your 19 reluctance to talk about how to improve the law is 20 not consistent with the mission of the agency. 21 The second thing is: Do you ever refer cases 22 to the attorney general's office when you see a 23 pattern and practice? 24 Well, let's say someone calls and they say, 25 Oh, no, three other people in my shop have the same 102 1 problem with this guy. 2 You have the authority to have them 3 individually hire -- file a complaint. 4 But the attorney general's office can bring 5 an injunctive action immediately if there's a 6 pattern and practice. 7 Do you ever refer matters to the civil rights 8 bureau? 9 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: We have not. 10 We have our division-initiated investigation 11 unit, where we look for systemic cases, and 12 investigate them, and bring them on behalf of the 13 State. So we handle those cases that way. 14 Uhm -- 15 SENATOR MAYER: But you -- 16 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: -- I'm sorry, go ahead. 17 SENATOR MAYER: -- can't go directly into 18 court? 19 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: Unless it's a housing 20 case and we filed a complaint. 21 SENATOR MAYER: No, no, on these sexual 22 harassment cases. 23 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: Cannot, no. 24 SENATOR MAYER: So would it be helpful, and 25 strengthen the mission of the agency, to have 103 1 direction, that when there is two or more 2 individuals with a similar complaint, that you be 3 directed to file with the attorney general's office, 4 a notice, so that they can go to court immediately, 5 to Mr. Quart's issue, and address some systemic 6 problem that is at -- potentially could impact them? 7 Would that legislation be helpful? 8 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: Just give me one 9 second, please? 10 SENATOR MAYER: Sure. 11 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: I just want to make sure 12 I understand what you're saying. 13 Would a directive to the division of human 14 rights, where two or more cases -- 15 SENATOR MAYER: A legislative change. 16 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Right. 17 -- two or more cases filed against a 18 respondent be sent to the attorney general? 19 SENATOR MAYER: Could be referred to the 20 attorney general. 21 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Could be? 22 SENATOR MAYER: Yes. 23 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Could be? 24 My hesitation in saying absolutely yes is the 25 "two or more cases." 104 1 Two or more cases doesn't nec -- it's -- you 2 know, all of the cases, and -- all of the cases that 3 we look at are fact- and circumstance-specific. 4 And I don't necessarily know that we don't 5 have the capacity to handle those cases. 6 And I don't necessarily know that the 7 attorney general would deem those cases something 8 that they want to handle. 9 So I don't know that we need a directive. 10 I think that we have the discretion, and we 11 use the discretion properly to handle cases the way 12 we deem fit. 13 And if we have to refer cases out, I think we 14 do so appropriately. 15 SENATOR MAYER: But you dodge -- you can't 16 bring an action for immediate injunctive relief, 17 civilly? 18 Correct? Right? 19 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Yeah, that is correct. 20 SENATOR MAYER: Okay. 21 And you mentioned you have your own 22 sexual-harassment unit. 23 Is that a physical -- 24 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Yes, it's a physical 25 office. 105 1 SENATOR MAYER: Where is it? 2 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: It's 55 Hanson Place in 3 Brooklyn. 4 SENATOR MAYER: And how would -- 5 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: (Indiscernible) 6 government building. 7 SENATOR MAYER: And how would someone know 8 about it, a complainant? 9 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: It's on our website. 10 It's on our literature. We let people know that it 11 exists when we do outreach and education. 12 They can call. And if they let us know what 13 the nature of their complaint is, we let them know 14 that they can file directly at the office of 15 sexual-harassment issues. Or, they can file at any 16 office, and it will be forwarded to that office for 17 investigation. 18 SENATOR MAYER: Okay. Thank you. 19 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: You're welcome. 20 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Assemblyman Buckwald. 21 ASSEMBLYMAN BUCHWALD: Thank you, 22 Mr. Chairman, to you and your fellow co-chairs, for 23 convening this hearing. 24 And my thanks to all of the deputy 25 commissioners for being here. 106 1 I'll be direct in my questions, primarily at 2 our state deputy commissioners, not being myself a 3 representative from New York City. 4 I'll admit to being a little bit confused, 5 first, on a point of basic math, which is, as 6 earlier stated, and Chairman Crespo accurately 7 calculated, that, with 6,000 individual 8 complaints -- or, over 6,000 individual complaints, 9 the 63 investigators, that works out to, 10 approximately, 95 per investigator. 11 And the response back was that, if you 12 exclude housing, it would be about 50 to 60. 13 But in the written testimony it says that, 14 approximately, 80 percent of complaints relate to 15 employment. 16 So by my math, at least 76 complaints per 17 investigator are those that exclude housing. 18 So I just want to note that. 19 Though my question, which also I'm at a point 20 of confusion, relates to the questioning earlier 21 from Senator Liu, and the observations made by a 22 number of legislative colleagues, about the role the 23 division plays with regards to recommendations for 24 legislation. 25 I'm aware that the division of human rights 107 1 itself puts out departmental bills, recommendations 2 for legislation. 3 My -- I guess my first question is: Are 4 either of you aware of how many bills, in total, the 5 division has put forward this year to the 6 Legislature? 7 And secondary to that: How many of those 8 bills relate to sexual harassment? 9 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: I do not. I don't 10 participate in that. I don't. 11 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: I am not aware of that 12 either. 13 ASSEMBLYMAN BUCHWALD: Just based on public 14 information, as far as I can tell, the division's 15 put out at least four bills, in total. 16 The only two bills that are published are -- 17 relate to housing discrimination, not the topic of 18 this hearing directly. 19 I guess what I don't understand, as a general 20 matter, is how the response of the department, with 21 regards to legislators' proposals, or public 22 proposals, is, "we don't get involved in 23 legislation." 24 But, the division feels appropriate, and 25 I think it is indeed appropriate, to put forward 108 1 legislation, another guise. 2 I totally get that there might not be a total 3 syncing, and any particular piece of legislation has 4 to go through a review process. 5 But there is a process, is there not, for the 6 division to opine on legislation, and to come up 7 with its own legislation? 8 Are either of you aware of any discussions 9 whatsoever in the division on putting forward 10 legislation on this topic? 11 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: I am not aware. 12 I don't participate in that. That would be our 13 general counsel's office. 14 So I don't have -- I'm not privy to it, so 15 I don't know. 16 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: We're not involved in 17 those discussions. 18 ASSEMBLYMAN BUCHWALD: How is it possible 19 that any part of the division could put forward 20 legislation related to sexual-harassment 21 enforcement, as is done, in general, through one of 22 your offices, deputy commissioner, or through the 23 regional offices, for the other deputy commissioner, 24 without consulting either of you? 25 Is it conceivable that some other part of the 109 1 division has put forward proposals, or is 2 considering putting forward proposals, without 3 consulting either of you on this topic? 4 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: We are -- I oversee the 5 attorneys and I do the DII. 6 So, you know, we enforce it. You know, here 7 is our statutes, this is what we have to enforce, 8 this is our process. 9 It is conceivable that it happens. 10 Again, I'm not a part of it. 11 In the past, may -- I'm trying to think if 12 I've participated in it, and I can't recall that, 13 but I won't speak for Miss Martinez. I don't know. 14 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Unfortunately, no, we're 15 not involved in that process. 16 We are involved in, respectively, overseeing 17 our units. 18 ASSEMBLYMAN BUCHWALD: Would either of you 19 plan, after today, to go to the able counsel, and 20 others, maybe under the commissioner's direction, 21 and inquire whether it's appropriate that, when 22 proposals are put forward by the division to the 23 Legislature, that some consultation be made with the 24 folks out in the field that you help oversee? 25 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: Sure, I'll let them 110 1 know. 2 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: I believe that will take 3 place after today. 4 ASSEMBLYMAN BUCHWALD: I suspect it might. 5 On the other proposals that are -- have been 6 put forward by the division, say, related to housing 7 discrimination, which both your offices deal with as 8 well, is there any consultation with your office? 9 Some of these proposals have existed for a 10 number of years. 11 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: I was not consulted. 12 ASSEMBLYMAN BUCHWALD: Might then your 13 inquiry already pending of supervisors and 14 colleagues, with regards to consultation on 15 sexual-harassment legislation, also extend to making 16 sure the consultation extends on these other topics? 17 Because, frankly, as a legislator, it is 18 disheartening to learn that the imprimatur of the 19 department, on the rare occasions when the 20 department -- excuse me, the division -- on rare 21 occasions when the division wants to get involved, 22 it turns out, it is not based on the broad expertise 23 of the division. 24 Is that fair to say? 25 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: I believe that we will 111 1 extend that discussion as well. 2 ASSEMBLYMAN BUCHWALD: And what -- what -- 3 I would, then, maybe, through the collective 4 legislative Chairs, you know, request that, if at 5 any point, the Assembly and Senate are informed of 6 new proposals from the division, or updated 7 proposals on the ones even outside the realm of 8 sexual harassment that come from the division, that 9 we learn whether those proposals are, in part, 10 informed by the broader expertise. 11 Which, in general, I commend. The division 12 has an office in my district in White Plains. I'm, 13 you know, very pleased that that's available to my 14 constituents. 15 Nonetheless, I'd like there to be some 16 greater, you know, consultation between the handful 17 of legislative proposals and what folks are 18 experiencing out in the field. 19 And, obviously, the broader point that 20 colleagues have already made, which is, the division 21 has the capacity to chime in on legislation. 22 Maybe that's to create its own, and to leave 23 legislators and the public to create their own, and 24 so forth. 25 I understand a lot of deference, certainly, 112 1 to our state's Chief Executive. 2 And I'm not saying there shouldn't be 3 consultation in that regard too, and shouldn't 4 necessarily be divisions and departments going off 5 on their own. 6 But, nonetheless, I think the process has not 7 been as robust, is could be to say the least. 8 And unless there is any further comment, 9 I yield back, and thank the Chairs for their time 10 for these questions. 11 SENATOR BIAGGI: Thank you. 12 I'm going to actually ask a few questions 13 now, after hearing from several of my colleagues. 14 So, I think I would like to begin with the 15 State. 16 In your testimony you mentioned that you 17 spoke with survivor groups. 18 Which survivor groups did you speak with? 19 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: And that's the -- that 20 was, I believe, when they were doing the drafting 21 and the policymaking for the DOL. We weren't 22 involved in that part of the process. 23 SENATOR BIAGGI: Who was involved? 24 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: That would be our 25 general counsel's office, and perhaps our outreach 113 1 office. 2 SENATOR BIAGGI: How often do you communicate 3 with your general counsel's office? 4 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: Quite frequently on 5 cases, and the stuff that we deal with, in terms of 6 whether it's a matter of a particular case or a 7 particular clause, but, for what we do. 8 SENATOR BIAGGI: So would it be common 9 practice for your general counsel to ask you -- 10 either of you, what approach to take on a specific 11 initiative, as this kind of laid out, so that he or 12 she would be able to know what questions to ask or 13 what issues have come up, probably because, I'm 14 assuming, the general counsel is not in the field, 15 but in an office? 16 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: It would probably be 17 more appropriate for the general counsel to consult 18 with the outreach and education individuals. 19 SENATOR BIAGGI: And who -- who do the 20 outreach and education individuals report to? 21 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: The first deputy 22 commissioner and the commissioner. 23 SENATOR BIAGGI: And who do both of you 24 report to? 25 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: I report to the first 114 1 deputy commissioner. 2 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: And I report to the 3 commissioner. 4 SENATOR BIAGGI: So, presumably, there is an 5 opportunity in your communication structure where 6 you are able to have these dialogues back and forth, 7 right, to make recommendations of things that you 8 see in the field, where you would be having these 9 conversations. 10 And the reason I highlight this is because 11 one of the frustrations that the public often has 12 with government, is that information is in silos. 13 And I would recommend -- it would be my 14 recommendation, that any findings that you have or 15 make or things that you see, especially on a topic 16 as important as sexual harassment, especially as 17 timely as it is, that there -- the conversations are 18 transparent, that they are open, that they are 19 inclusive, and that no walls are erected to prevent 20 any type of progress from moving forward. 21 You also mentioned that anyone can file in 22 the state. And I heard several times you discussed 23 the different offices throughout the state. And 24 I believe you said that there are 12 regional 25 offices, and I'm happy to learn about this 115 1 55 Hanson Place office as well. 2 And you mentioned also that you do outreach 3 and you do mailings. 4 Do you use social media; and if so, how? 5 Because I -- the reason I ask is because 6 I haven't heard of this outreach, and I haven't seen 7 this outreach. And I'm on the -- at least I would 8 like to think I'm on the pulse of this issue. I'm 9 not an expert yet, but I'm on my way, hopefully. 10 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Yes, we have a Twitter 11 account, we have a Facebook account, we have an 12 Instagram account. And I believe, if I'm not 13 mistaken, we have a LinkedIn account, or we are in 14 the process of creating a LinkedIn account. 15 I'm not really good with social media, but 16 I think those are the main ones. 17 SENATOR BIAGGI: Okay, thank you. 18 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: You're welcome. 19 SENATOR BIAGGI: In -- with relation to 20 communication, again, going back to that point, at 21 any point in time, does New York State communicate 22 with New York City? 23 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: We definitely 24 interacted on drafting the model policies and the 25 model training under the new deal -- DOL law. 116 1 D.C. DANA SUSSMAN: Yes, I'm regularly in 2 touch with, unfortunately, not my two colleagues up 3 here today, but the general counsel and first deputy 4 commissioner. 5 On our side, we're regularly in touch. 6 SENATOR BIAGGI: So just to be clear, so 7 you're in touch with the general counsel at the 8 State -- 9 D.C. DANA SUSSMAN: Yes. 10 SENATOR BIAGGI: -- on these issues? 11 D.C. DANA SUSSMAN: That's right. 12 SENATOR BIAGGI: Okay. 13 And, then, does the general counsel often 14 communicate to the State the information that is 15 learned from the City? 16 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: It depends on what it 17 is. 18 I don't get regular briefings from the 19 general counsel about that. 20 And to answer your question, I do communicate 21 with other members of the New York City commission, 22 other deputy commissioners. And, also, we see each 23 other quite a bit when we attend the EEOC 24 conferences. 25 SENATOR BIAGGI: Okay, if you wanted to make 117 1 a recommendation, let's say, perhaps to make it so 2 that it's regular communication between the City and 3 the State, how would you go about doing that? 4 This question is directed to the State. 5 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: There actually is a 6 regular communication. If I'm not mistaken, there 7 is something called "The Civil Rights Roundtable." 8 D.C. DANA SUSSMAN: Uh-huh, that's right. 9 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: I believe that you -- 10 our first deputy commissioner attends that. 11 I'm not really sure how often that is, but, 12 members from the EEOC, HUD, our agency, and the 13 New York City Commission attend. 14 Have you attended those meetings? 15 D.C. DANA SUSSMAN: I have not, but my 16 colleagues regularly do, yes. 17 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: I haven't attended. 18 SENATOR BIAGGI: And any information from 19 those meetings, how is that disseminated to all -- 20 to the State or the City? 21 D.C. DANA SUSSMAN: In my office, it's 22 typically our law enforcement leadership that 23 attends, because it's quite law enforcement-focused, 24 as opposed to my side, which is policy. 25 And we're regularly briefed on the topics 118 1 that will be discussed, and the conversation that's 2 had there, in our executive team meetings. 3 SENATOR BIAGGI: And for the State? 4 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: And I get occasional 5 information when I meet with my supervisor as to 6 what occurred during those meetings. 7 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: If there's relevant 8 case law that they may have discussed, she may bring 9 it back to us. 10 If there's an outreach event, she would talk 11 to the outreach people. 12 Things like that. 13 SENATOR BIAGGI: So you could see where there 14 could be some type of issues if there's not a clear 15 communication or a report after every meeting. 16 And I think that one of the most important 17 things that we can do, especially -- 18 And this is with no disrespect to the State, 19 I am obviously a representative of the State. 20 -- that we could do better as a state, by 21 taking the lead from New York City, who has led in 22 so many ways. 23 And, of course, you know, smaller area, but 24 lots of people, still, and has been a real 25 trailblazer, I think, in so many ways. 119 1 And the State can definitely learn from that 2 type of bravery. 3 So going back to the data that DHR collects, 4 in terms of collecting sexual-harassment reporting 5 data, and I won't go -- I won't belabor you through 6 all the statistics and the numbers that you do, but, 7 at the end of each year, where does that data go? 8 So, does it go to the general counsel, and 9 then does the general counsel report that to the 10 commissioner? 11 And then who does the commissioner, perhaps, 12 report that to? 13 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: So we have database on 14 our fiscal year, calendar year. We have what we 15 call an "annual report," and that is actually posted 16 on our website, but it has to be reviewed by our 17 general counsel. All of our -- 18 SENATOR BIAGGI: Who else is it reviewed by? 19 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: The commissioner. 20 SENATOR BIAGGI: I'm sorry? 21 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: The commissioner. 22 SENATOR BIAGGI: The commissioner? 23 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Yes. 24 SENATOR BIAGGI: And who else? 25 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: I'm not really aware if 120 1 there are other people. 2 I submit my own report from my units. 3 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: I submit from my units, 4 we review them. We give them to -- they combine 5 them all, and reviewed by the commissioner and 6 general counsel. After that, I'm not aware. 7 SENATOR BIAGGI: Is it probable that the 8 annual report, before being made public, would be 9 reviewed by the Executive? 10 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: I can't answer that 11 because I don't know the process. 12 I know my process. 13 SENATOR BIAGGI: Has anything that you have 14 created or done been reviewed by the Executive in 15 your normal course of business? 16 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: No. 17 SENATOR BIAGGI: Nothing that you have 18 done -- 19 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: Not that I'm aware of. 20 SENATOR BIAGGI: -- in the course of your 21 business has been -- 22 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: Not that I'm aware of. 23 I mean -- 24 SENATOR BIAGGI: -- discussed with the 25 Executive, ever? 121 1 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: I don't know what 2 happens after it goes from me to my boss. 3 It's possible. 4 SENATOR BIAGGI: Okay. 5 Going back to the point, I don't want to 6 belabor this too much, but I think this is -- are -- 7 very important to be very succinct on these issues: 8 Are you familiar with Executive Law 294? 9 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: I'm not -- if you tell 10 me what the law is. 11 SENATOR BIAGGI: So the law is, The Statutory 12 Mandated Powers and Duties of DHR, your agency, and 13 Executive Law 294, says: The division shall 14 formulate policies to effectuate the purposes of 15 this article, and may make recommendations to 16 agencies and officers of the state or local 17 subdivisions of government in aid of such policies 18 and purposes. 19 Are you familiar with Executive Law 295? 20 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Would you mind reading 21 it, please? 22 SENATOR BIAGGI: Sure. 23 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Thank you. 24 SENATOR BIAGGI: So, Executive Law 295, there 25 are two relevant provisions, Section 8 and 122 1 Section 9. 2 In Section 8 it discusses advisory councils, 3 and it empowers the division to go through all kinds 4 of different issues, but to discuss and study 5 problems, such as the ones that we're discussing 6 today, and then make recommendations accordingly. 7 In Section 9 it says, that you have the power 8 to develop human rights plans and policies for the 9 state, and to assist in your execution, and to make 10 investigations and studies appropriate to effectuate 11 this article, to issue such publications and such 12 results of investigations and research, as, in its 13 judgment, will tend to inform persons of the rights 14 assured and remedies provided under this article to 15 promote good will, and minimize or eliminate 16 discrimination because of age, race, creed, color, 17 national origin, sexual orientation, gender identity 18 or expression, military status, sex, disability, or 19 marital status. 20 And are you familiar with the submission of 21 program bills? 22 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: I know that they get 23 submitted, but I don't participate in them, so 24 I can't really speak them. 25 SENATOR BIAGGI: But are you familiar with 123 1 them? 2 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: Sure. 3 SENATOR BIAGGI: So Senator Liu's not in the 4 room at the moment, but, this year, DHR actually 5 submitted a program bill for Senator Liu and 6 Senator Martinez. 7 And so I will double down on what 8 Assemblymember Buchwald had asked you, and I would 9 really encourage you, because we would like to be 10 your partners in this fight, it's an incredibly 11 important effort, to please weigh in on the package 12 of legislation that we've put forward because, we 13 cannot wait any longer, and we need your input, it's 14 valuable to us; your opinions are valuable to us, 15 your expertise is valuable to us. And we want to be 16 your partners in the state. 17 And I as a legislator am going to break down 18 that wall that is oftentimes put between us, and I'm 19 inviting you in. 20 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: We're happy to work with 21 you. 22 SENATOR BIAGGI: Thank you. 23 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Assemblywoman Cruz. 24 ASSEMBLYWOMAN CRUZ: Thank you. 25 I have a couple of questions related to the 124 1 process. 2 The first one: What percentage of the 3 complaints that actually get to you represent folks 4 who have been fired by the time that they actually 5 file a complaint? 6 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: I don't have those 7 numbers for you, but I can try to get them from the 8 regional office. 9 ASSEMBLYWOMAN CRUZ: Thank you. 10 D.C. DANA SUSSMAN: And, unfortunately, 11 I don't have those numbers either. 12 But, anecdotally, most people do come to us 13 after they've left the situation involving the 14 harassment, whether it's, as I mentioned earlier, a 15 constructive discharge, where the circumstances were 16 so unpleasant and so degrading that people were, 17 essentially, forced to resign or forced to quit, 18 versus being fired, versus, you know, some other 19 kind of separation. 20 I don't have those numbers, but, anecdotally, 21 I can say that it's the majority of cases, that 22 people come to us after they've left. 23 ASSEMBLYWOMAN CRUZ: And now I want to talk 24 about what happens to the cases that actually make 25 it to the end portion. 125 1 For a brief stint, I was an ALJ, so I can 2 tell you that there is a lot of latitude with what 3 happens inside a room when there's a settlement 4 process. 5 My concern, and what I often hear from 6 advocates, and when we worked together on the task 7 force, was, I can't afford to hire a lawyer to go 8 with me to one of these agency meetings, settlement 9 meetings, unofficial hearings, or, actually, 10 official hearings. 11 And so one of these proposals that had been 12 discussed, as -- actually as a departmental, was 13 legal fees for the plaintiffs, for the folks who are 14 coming forward, and being able to file the claim. 15 Did that ever go anywhere with the State; can 16 someone get legal fees for representation to come in 17 front of your agency? 18 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: In housing cases, yes. 19 And now in sexual-harassment cases as well. 20 ASSEMBLYWOMAN CRUZ: In sexual-harassment 21 cases you can? 22 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: Yes. 23 ASSEMBLYWOMAN CRUZ: And for the City? 24 D.C. DANA SUSSMAN: Yes, it's a recent 25 change. All cases brought to the commission on 126 1 human rights, the complainant's attorney may be able 2 to recover attorney's fees. 3 ASSEMBLYWOMAN CRUZ: And what is the -- is 4 there a procedure to connect folks/complainants with 5 an attorney, be it low bono, where there are fees 6 that are getting -- get back; pro bono; or any other 7 way? 8 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: In terms of assigning 9 an attorney to a case prior to probable cause, the 10 State doesn't assign an attorney. But once there is 11 a probable-cause determination, we do handle it. 12 If a complainant is interested in hiring a 13 private attorney, I've never dealt with it, we 14 usually don't make recom -- I would say we don't 15 make a recommendation as to it. 16 But if they went to legal aid, or if they 17 went to someone like that, they could use those 18 attorneys at our agency. 19 ASSEMBLYWOMAN CRUZ: I mean, my concern with 20 an answer like that, is that, when you have someone 21 who doesn't understand the system, expecting them to 22 go out on their own and actually find a lawyer on 23 their own is nearly impossible. 24 And the power dynamics of what happens inside 25 a settlement room, when you have someone who has an 127 1 attorney versus someone who doesn't, especially if 2 they're not familiar with the system, it's going to 3 be skewed in favor of the employer who can actually 4 afford to have a lawyer there representing them. 5 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: Sure, if I may, I'm 6 sorry, I didn't necessarily understand the whole 7 thing. 8 ASSEMBLYWOMAN CRUZ: (Indiscernible) -- yeah. 9 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: So we would definitely 10 appoint an attorney post PC. And if they said that, 11 you know, they -- they, you know, want a private 12 attorney, when I say we wouldn't recommend somebody, 13 I mean, like an individual law firm. We could refer 14 them to the bar, you can call, or you can call legal 15 aid. 16 That's what I meant. 17 ASSEMBLYWOMAN CRUZ: And once you get to the 18 settlement conference, what's the procedure for a 19 settlement conference? 20 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: On the prehearing 21 settlement conference, it's set up ahead of time. 22 Notices are sent out to all the parties, including 23 the complainant, as well as well as the respondents. 24 It's scheduled, we have Wednesdays and 25 Thursdays. 128 1 We assign an attorney. 2 They -- conferences are for one hour. The 3 administrative law judge begins the call. 4 The attorney would have spoken to the 5 complainant beforehand, reviewed the facts of the 6 case, determined what kind of damages they are 7 interested in. 8 Once everybody calls in, and the ALJ leads 9 that call, then discussions are held about whether 10 or not, you know, they can come to terms on an 11 agreement or not. 12 ASSEMBLYWOMAN CRUZ: And, you know, one of 13 the things that quite never happened during my brief 14 stint as an ALJ, was some sort of training about 15 trauma-informed decision-making. 16 Is that happening in either one of the 17 agencies? 18 Because, when you sit there and you have to 19 hear some of the -- some of what's coming in front 20 of you, some cases may be very non-controversial; 21 others can tug at your heartstrings. 22 And we want to make sure, not only that the 23 judgment isn't clouded, but that the ALJ is 24 understanding that who is in front of them is a 25 survivor. And they need to have that knowledge. 129 1 Are you providing any sort of trauma-informed 2 decision-making training? 3 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: Are you talking to the 4 ALJ -- 5 ASSEMBLYWOMAN CRUZ: Yes, for the ALJs. 6 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: -- or the attorneys? 7 So we do do our yearly training. 8 The ALJs that we've had have been there for 9 several years. They have been dealing with all of 10 our cases where the victims are of discrimination. 11 Not only sexual harassment, but any kind of 12 discrimination is really personal. 13 But they do receive training. 14 Whether or not it's specific to trauma, I'm 15 not sure. 16 ASSEMBLYWOMAN CRUZ: Okay. 17 I would encourage you to do that, and 18 not just do it yearly. A yearly training for 19 three hours, it's not gonna to cut it. 20 I mean, I am assuming it's a short training, 21 but it's not going to cut it for a topic that's this 22 important to our community, and that truly is that 23 traumatic for all of the parties involved. 24 Does the City do anything like that? 25 D.C. DANA SUSSMAN: We are in touch with our 130 1 counterparts at OATH -- it's the office of 2 administrative trials and hearings -- for the city. 3 But we, as far as I'm aware, are not 4 providing them with training. 5 But I will take this recommendation back. 6 ASSEMBLYWOMAN CRUZ: Thank you. 7 Thank you. 8 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Senator Bailey. 9 SENATOR BAILEY: Thank you, Madam Chair, and 10 thank you to the Co-Chairs. 11 And thank you for coming before us today. 12 I have a couple of questions. 13 One is a brief comment and follow-up to 14 Senator Mayer's position. 15 I know you said you don't make recommendation 16 or legislation, but I would implore you to look at 17 Senate Print 24 -- 2874A, which establishes the 18 crime of sexual harassment. 19 That relates specifically to what 20 Senator Mayer was indicating about referrals or 21 indications to the district attorneys. It's 22 something that advanced with the Codes Committee 23 just a couple of weeks ago. 24 And I would ask that you take a serious look 25 into that, and how it would affect your roles and 131 1 what you're doing there. 2 That is by Senator Biaggi. 3 My main question is about demographics. 4 For the State: Do you aggregate data via 5 democrat -- via demographics? 6 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: You speak so fast. 7 What? 8 SENATOR BAILEY: I'm sorry. 9 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: When you say 10 "demographics," are you talking about the types of 11 cases we have? locations? 12 We have the ability to pull the data. 13 If you're talking demographics in terms of 14 locations, we can pull them from what our regional 15 office sees. 16 If you're talking about, we want to pull the 17 types of cases, like sexual harassment, or housing, 18 we can pull those kind of data as well. 19 SENATOR BAILEY: Let me be a little more 20 specific. I apologize. 21 Demographics related to race, gen -- not 22 gen -- race, gender, age, along those lines, do you 23 have -- do you aggregate data along those lines? 24 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: Do we have any data 25 with us today? No. 132 1 But we do have the ability to pull that data. 2 SENATOR BAILEY: That would be very helpful. 3 And my final question is related to language 4 access. 5 Language access is huge in any context, but 6 especially in the context where people who are a 7 victim of sexual harassments, are -- they're already 8 scared, they're already fearful. 9 If English is not your first language, 10 I believe that would create another barrier to an 11 individual coming forth. 12 Is there any, like -- what is your agency -- 13 are your agencies doing? 14 I heard it from the City in context about 15 having signs in English and Spanish. 16 But, in a city of 8 million people, in a 17 state of 19 million people, we are so diverse. 18 And as our workforce diversifies, we should 19 make sure that we are more in touch with the number 20 of languages that are -- that -- that are spoken in 21 the state. 22 Is -- what is being done in either agency 23 about that? 24 D.C. DANA SUSSMAN: Sure, I can address the 25 Spanish and English posters. 133 1 The legislation that was passed last year 2 mandates that all employers, even if you have one 3 employee, must post a notice of rights in English 4 and Spanish. That's the mandate. 5 And so we are sending those posters. 6 We've actually done business, walk-throughs, 7 where we're physically handing business owners the 8 posters in English and Spanish. 9 We've additionally translated that document 10 into the local law, 30 languages. So additional 11 languages are available on our website. 12 Just for the cost associated with mailing it 13 in so many languages, we couldn't do it by mail, but 14 we have them available on our website in upwards of 15 10 or 11 languages at this point. 16 In addition, at the commission, we speak 17 about 35 languages. That's up from six languages 18 when our commissioner started in 2015. For a 19 relatively small agency, that was a massive 20 priority, that we ensure we have as many languages 21 covered. It's not all. 22 And our commissioner is constantly trying to 23 up that number. 24 And, also, to reflect, not only linguistic 25 competency, but cultural competency, to ensure that 134 1 we are bringing in people to work at the commission 2 that reflect the communities that we serve. 3 So we've built positions around Muslim, Arab, 4 South Asian, lead advisor; an African communities' 5 lead advisor; a Jewish communities' liaison. 6 The list goes on. 7 A trans communities' leader. 8 So we take that mandate very seriously. We 9 could always do better. 10 If someone comes in that does not speak a 11 language of a staff member that's available to meet 12 with them in that moment, we obviously will use 13 LanguageLine, and we have contemporaneous telephonic 14 interpretation. 15 We know that that's not always the best, but, 16 again, we try to match people with someone on our 17 staff who speaks the language they speak. 18 ASSEMBLYMAN BUCHWALD: Certainly. 19 And to the State? 20 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: With the State, we have 21 a language-access policy. That is our mandate. It 22 comes in at least eight different languages. 23 My understand -- I know that, when someone 24 comes into our office, the first thing they try to 25 do is figure out what language they are speaking. 135 1 If we don't have someone available, we do use 2 the language access line. 3 We do have available to us, any important 4 documents. Or, documents, if a complainant needs 5 something translated, we get that translated for 6 them as well. 7 In addition, our front-line staff, attorneys, 8 are trained in sensitivity, yearly. And we do have 9 discussions with our individual groups about it as 10 well. 11 ASSEMBLYMAN BUCHWALD: I remain concerned 12 about, again, individuals who are already speaking 13 about a very sensitive issue. And if they have to 14 wait any time further than that moment of urgency, 15 that moment of crisis, that they're facing. 16 In the event there is not a language that you 17 have in either a speaker in your office or an 18 individual that you can access via the language 19 line, how long would that process take to be able to 20 translate that document, and be able to at least put 21 that person who is complaining of sexual harassment 22 at a little bit of ease? 23 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: I don't have an exact 24 date, but from experience, what we try to do, if 25 it's a language that's not so common, such as 136 1 Fukienese, and we had to find someone, we would work 2 around the complainant's schedule, and so, this way, 3 they're not sitting there; or perhaps the next day. 4 But we would work with an urgency because we 5 do realize this is a sensitive topic. They do want 6 to say what they want to, you know, express, and 7 file complaints. 8 So we try to work with a sense of urgency, 9 but an exact time frame, I can't give you. 10 I would hope that it's at least within a 11 week, if not shorter. 12 ASSEMBLYMAN BUCHWALD: Sure. 13 I would hope that it would be within 14 24 hours, which would be my hope. 15 Would an individual who has language issues, 16 would they be precluded or permitted to bring an 17 individual who was -- would be able to translate in 18 their native language? 19 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: No, it would be 20 helpful. 21 But if it is a matter of an interpretation of 22 official document, or the signing under a jurat, we 23 would have an official interpreter. 24 ASSEMBLYMAN BUCHWALD: I guess I would have 25 just one more comment concerning the -- your -- the 137 1 demographic data that, hopefully, we'll be obtaining 2 soon. 3 I would implore you once again to -- as the 4 City has mentioned, going to certain communities 5 that may be at higher risk for harassment, that may 6 be -- that may have reported these incidences in -- 7 in -- in more -- in greater frequency, and maybe 8 increase your outreach. 9 Because as Senator Biaggi questioned, the 10 outreach is appreciated, but it seems rather 11 nebulous as to what the nature of the outreach 12 actually is. 13 So, again, I would implore you to -- to -- 14 continue to -- and I understand the cost 15 constraints, we all work in state government, I get 16 it. But we have to make sure that we are 17 communicating effectively to those individuals who 18 we want to make sure that we hear them. 19 So, I appreciate your time. 20 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: If I may just follow 21 up, the demographics that you want, is that for 22 race, age, sexual-harassment cases? 23 Just so I -- or, how do you want that? 24 ASSEMBLYMAN BUCHWALD: I would appreciate 25 sexual-harassment data, yes. 138 1 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: And I just -- thank you. 2 I just wanted to add, in terms of our 3 outreach, we do partner with other agencies and 4 community organizations. 5 For example, we've done outreach with the 6 Office of New Americans, for people that have newly 7 come to New York, just to make sure that they 8 understand their rights. 9 As I stated earlier, for individuals that may 10 not feel comfortable, because we are a state agency, 11 we do go work with the Office of New Americans to 12 let them know, when someone comes to their agency, 13 here, this is what you can do if you feel afraid, 14 you can call us, if you feel like you've been 15 discriminated against. If not, here are your rights 16 in case it does come up. 17 ASSEMBLYMAN BUCHWALD: Thank you very much. 18 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: You're welcome. 19 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Assemblywoman Niou, 20 patiently waiting. 21 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: I know (indiscernible). 22 Hello. 23 So I -- I mean, I just wanted to say a couple 24 things before I start my questions. 25 But, I want to echo my colleagues, because 139 1 every single agency that comes before us to testify, 2 we hear from so many across different issues, right, 3 housing, finance, economic development, et cetera, 4 but they all give us recommendations on the 5 legislation that we have put forth, or speak to 6 them. 7 And so I just want to, you know, also echo 8 their shock. 9 I also want to address a couple of words that 10 you guys used. 11 I know you guys had that, you know, with the 12 statute of limitations, you know, one year, people 13 might have worse memories, or things might go stale, 14 or things aren't as fresh. 15 And I -- I -- I just wanted to address that 16 really quick, because, as a sexual-assault survivor 17 myself, I will say that it was over 20 years before 18 I could even speak up about it. 19 And there has not been a single moment that 20 I haven't lived with it. And, there's -- the 21 memories of it are -- are very fresh, and they won't 22 go stale. 23 I remember what he smells like. I remember 24 what he looked like. I remember the desk, and the 25 color that -- the color of the desk that I was 140 1 grabbing onto. 2 And -- and -- I -- I just want to -- I just 3 want to put that out there for you before we 4 continue. 5 And using that kind of language is hurtful 6 for the folks in the room. 7 Uhm -- so -- so, for some questions: 8 I also wanted to kind of touch base a little 9 bit on the doubling of the cases. 10 You know, you guys said that it was due to a 11 culture shift. 12 I mean, I personally use different language. 13 I call it the "end of systemic silence." 14 But I just -- I have -- I have a question on 15 why, then, the agencies are not proactive, instead 16 of just reactive, knowing that there are so many 17 folks who are silenced for so long? 18 D.C. DANA SUSSMAN: I think -- first of all, 19 thank you for centering us back to, really, the 20 heart of the issue, and for sharing. 21 I think, you know, the -- our commission has 22 taken this issue seriously from the very start of 23 our commissioner's leadership. 24 The case I cited in my testimony earlier was 25 the first order that our commissioner issued, 141 1 I worked with her on that order, where we issued the 2 highest civil penalties in the history of the 3 commission; the only time the commission has issued 4 civil penalties of $250,000, which is the maximum 5 allowable. 6 And we were not sure if the State -- it was 7 appealed to state court. We were not sure if the 8 state court would affirm it. 9 And we waited three-plus years for that 10 decision -- not we -- the complainant had to wait 11 three-plus years for that decision. 12 But from that 2015 moment, to 2019 when that 13 decision was issued, #MeToo relaunched. 14 And it has not -- this is not a new issue, as 15 we know. This is not an issue that -- that sort of 16 reemerged as a problem. It's simply that people are 17 talk -- like you, and so many others, people are 18 talking about it. 19 And, you know, judges are humans too; 20 government folks are humans too. 21 And I don't know if #MeToo had an impact on 22 that judge's decision, but I'd like to think, in 23 maybe my naive way, that -- that -- the movement has 24 made an impact on the judiciary. 25 So, I guess to go back to your question, this 142 1 has been an issue, regardless of whether it's in the 2 public, it's the story of the day, or not. 3 And what I'm grateful for is that it 4 continues to be the story of the day, day after day. 5 This movement has not stopped. 6 It's -- and, so, you know, we have been 7 committed to this issue. It's one that we take 8 incredibly seriously, and have since the 9 commissioner's very start at our agency; and it will 10 continue to remain a focus. 11 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: I would say, as for the 12 State, of course, more can always be done. 13 As I previously stated, what we have done 14 with the outreach, our new commissioner, she's now 15 with us for a month and a day, and she's made it 16 clear, our mandate is going to be, we're gonna get 17 out there into the public; we're going to educate, 18 we're going to let them know that we're here, and 19 how we could help. 20 But -- our position -- not our position -- 21 but, you will be seeing more of the division under 22 this commissioner; she's going to make it her point. 23 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: Okay, so I guess, just 24 to follow up, three-plus years is a long time. 25 And then, also, with the numbers of the 143 1 three years that the statute of limitations for 2 going to court comes up, it brings me to another 3 question of: How -- how do you guys present all the 4 options to folks? 5 Like, how do you -- I mean, I kind of wonder 6 more, because I heard a little bit about how you 7 present, you know, the options to folks, but -- on 8 the City side. 9 But on the State side, how do folks even know 10 what their options are, and how do you guys present 11 them to them? 12 Because you're saying that you do when you're 13 are talking to folks. 14 But, is there an encouragement to do things 15 within the agency, or is there encouragement to go 16 to court? 17 Like, how does that -- how does that work? 18 Like, you guys can role-play if you want. 19 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: I think -- well, when we 20 do -- or -- when we do an outreach, an education 21 event, we let people know what their rights are. 22 And then we let them know what the complaint process 23 is. 24 And, many times, we have an investigator at 25 the event, so that if someone actually wishes to 144 1 file a complaint on-site, they can. 2 We also have other additional staff there as 3 well. 4 And we listen to them right then and there. 5 And, depending on what they tell us, we give 6 them their options. 7 If they say, "Yeah, I want to talk to you 8 right now. I'm not ready to file right now," we'll 9 give them a complaint form, we'll give them our 10 literature, and we'll say, Take your time. 11 We ask them -- 12 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: But when that happens, 13 do you -- do you tell them, Well, this is the 14 statute of limitations? 15 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Absolutely. And that's 16 actually what I was just going to say. 17 We ask them what the dates are, and we say, 18 Okay, well, this is what you're dealing with in 19 terms of your time frames. If you don't want to 20 file with us, this -- you know, this is the date 21 that you have. If it's ongoing, that's fine. If 22 it's something that -- 23 Not that it's fine. I didn't mean it's fine. 24 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: (Indiscernible 25 cross-talking.) 145 1 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: It's never fine. 2 But if it's a finite event, that someone was 3 discharged -- that's a finite event -- then we need 4 to use that date, for purposes of the statute of 5 limitations and purposes of filing. 6 And we let them know that they can also go to 7 court, and, you know, we have to use that date for 8 the three-year mark. 9 We give them the information up front so that 10 they're armed with the knowledge. 11 If they need to go home and think about it or 12 talk to someone else, they can do that. 13 We give them our contact information as well. 14 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: Can you tell me what 15 kind of language you guys use, though? 16 That's -- I want -- I want specifics. 17 I mean, I wasn't kidding about the role-play. 18 Like, can you just let me know, like, how -- 19 what kind of language you would use at one of those 20 events, if somebody -- if I was to say, you know, 21 Something's happening with me at work. I want to 22 see if I could file a complaint. I want to know 23 what my rights are. Can you let me know? 24 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Go ahead. 25 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: Oh, I thought you were 146 1 going to play the -- okay. 2 I was at work. Uhm, you know, I just came 3 from work. Several things are happening to me that 4 I'm not necessarily comfortable about talking. But 5 I need to speak to somebody about it. 6 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Okay. It's very brave 7 of you to come to us today. I'm glad you came. 8 Let's talk about it. 9 Do you want to tell me a little bit more 10 about what happened? 11 Did this happen today? 12 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: No, it's been ongoing 13 for a while, and it's been, my colleagues, my male 14 colleagues, have been making me feel uncomfortable 15 by doing certain acts. 16 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Okay. Are you 17 interested in filing a complaint, taking formal 18 action? Have you spoken to someone else about this 19 yet? 20 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: No, I haven't spoken to 21 anyone else about it, but I'd like to speak to you, 22 and here's what happened. 23 Just, I'll -- just assume that I told her 24 everything that happens, please. 25 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Okay. What I can do is, 147 1 I can talk to you about your options. 2 So you can file a formal complaint with the 3 division of human rights, and we can actually 4 conduct a formal investigation, and we can talk to 5 witnesses if you have witnesses. We can help to 6 stop the bad actor and the uncomfortable harassment. 7 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: Do I have any other 8 options? 9 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: You can also file 10 a formal complaint in state court. You have 11 three years to do that as well. 12 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: Will that cost money, 13 do I need an attorney? 14 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: With the division of 15 human rights, you don't need an attorney to file a 16 complaint with us. You don't need an attorney in 17 state court. But we can also put you in touch with 18 agencies where you can find an attorney. 19 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: Okay. Thank you for 20 that, and thank you for taking the time to do that. 21 Potentially, I mean, this is for the City and 22 the State, can the process, internally, delay, and 23 the -- and the use of the process, internally, can 24 that potentially delay or be used against victims, 25 you know, when they -- if they want to go to court, 148 1 in the end? 2 Could it potentially be used against them to 3 meet that statute of limitations of three years? 4 D.C. DANA SUSSMAN: I'll have to get back to 5 you specifically. 6 But it's my understanding that, as 7 I mentioned earlier, if you file with the 8 commission, you still have the opportunity to go to 9 state or federal court, because we, essentially, 10 (indiscernible) jurisdictional can cross-file with 11 the EEOC. So we're preserving your federal claims 12 as well, up to a certain point in the process. 13 So if we make a determination on your case, 14 you've, essentially, chosen your venue with the 15 commission. 16 The time that it stays with the commission 17 during that process I think may count against that 18 three-year period. 19 And I just want to clarify that, at the 20 commission, for gender-based harassment claims, you 21 have three years to come to the commission, just 22 like you would if you were going to state court. 23 And what we found, again -- this is anecdotal 24 from our law enforcement bureau -- that the 25 three-year extension has been useful. People have 149 1 been coming forward in that sort of 1-year to 2 1/2, 2 3-year period. 3 Recog -- and this was one of the legis -- 4 pieces of legislation that we were supportive of at 5 the City level, in recognition of how long it takes 6 people to leave that situation, understand their 7 options, come to terms with it, decide what they 8 want to do. 9 And so that's been a successful amendment to 10 our law, from our perspective. 11 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: Okay. 12 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: I'm not sure of the 13 answer, but I can get that for you. 14 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: Could you? 15 Because I kind of -- I kind of wonder, 16 because of the fact that, you know, just -- as we're 17 hearing, that some of the cases take so long. 18 And -- I mean, when -- when -- sometimes it 19 should take longer, and that's why I think a lot of 20 my colleagues are asking about the statutes, and 21 what we should be looking at, because I know that 22 you guys used, in your testimony, the words were, 23 I believe, "efficient and effective investigation." 24 And I just -- I sometimes I just -- I worry 25 that -- that -- that it means something else; that 150 1 it means that it's quick and they want to stop them. 2 And so I -- I -- I wonder, you know, same as 3 my colleagues on that. 4 And I also wonder, you know, is it DHR's job 5 to also train all of the other state agencies on how 6 to deal with these issues within their agencies? 7 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: I know that DHR, in the 8 training that is given to all state agencies, I know 9 that, on sexual harassment, DHR took the lead in 10 drafting that training. 11 Perhaps the witness who comes after me could 12 tell you more about it, but I know that DHR has 13 participated. 14 And if any other -- we have worked with DHCR 15 in the cross-training. 16 So if any other agency asked us to come in 17 and help, DHR would. 18 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: So when something 19 happens, say, for example, at the MTA, do they -- 20 do -- should people be filing with you, or should 21 they be filing with the MTA? 22 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: They could file with 23 us. 24 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: But do they usually file 25 with the MTA? 151 1 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: What they usually do, 2 I don't know. 3 I know that we do get cases from the MTA, by 4 employees. 5 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: So do you think that 6 maybe there should be some research, or, could you 7 guys get me that answer on how many people file with 8 the MTA rather than file with you, and if they have 9 an internal process, et cetera? 10 Like, I mean, with all the state agencies, 11 I kind of wonder because, we've heard, I've 12 personally heard, a lot of different stories with 13 different state agencies, where the internal process 14 within an agency, there's promises made, obviously, 15 or, like, people are, like, saying, Oh, you don't 16 have to go and report to this place or that place, 17 or you don't have to go to court. We can handle it 18 here. We promise it will be taken care of. 19 And, instead, it takes years and years and 20 years, statute of limitations runs out, and, on top 21 of that, they get nothing, and they get no closure, 22 no resolutions. And people end up being take -- you 23 know, fired, et cetera. 24 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: Okay, we'll do our best 25 to get that. 152 1 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: Yeah, and I also want to 2 know the percentage of complainants that have 3 already been fired when they come to you, and what 4 percentage are current employees, unless you guys 5 have that? 6 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: No, I believe that was 7 the same questions as Ms. Simon, as to the 8 percentage that come to us already fired. 9 That, I'm going to -- we're going to try and 10 get the answer for that as well. 11 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: And is there a 12 difference in how you guys handle certain cases when 13 an employee is a member of more than one protected 14 class? 15 Like, a transgender, older, African-American 16 woman? 17 D.C. DANA SUSSMAN: We -- so we assess the 18 facts of the case. And at the complaint-filing 19 stage, we will -- you know, again, we interpret our 20 law quite broadly and protections broadly. 21 So we will, in an effort to ensure that we 22 are as inclusive as possible of the potential 23 violations of the law, we will likely add as many 24 protected categories as we think appropriate, based 25 on the experience of that person. 153 1 So it could be race and gender and age and 2 disability. 3 And, in fact, we do see a lot of cases where 4 we've got multiple intersecting violations. 5 So, you know, women of color are particularly 6 vulnerable. Undocumented people are particularly 7 vulnerable. Young -- younger employees. LGBTQ 8 employees. 9 So we -- we will "charge," is what the 10 language is, we will charge multiple protected 11 categories in the complaint to ensure that we're 12 capturing the behavior. 13 And if, as we -- as we do the violation, some 14 of those may drop out because it might -- you know, 15 the claim may not be as broad or as all-encompassing 16 as we had originally understood, and that's okay. 17 But we want to make sure that we capture it all at 18 the outset. 19 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: The same -- the same for 20 the State. 21 In terms of the way we conduct the 22 investigation, it's the same across all bases in 23 filings. We do a thorough investigation, despite 24 how many bases, protected classes, we include. 25 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: Okay, I appreciate that. 154 1 Thank you. 2 And one last question, and I know I'm taking 3 up so much time, and I have a lot more, but I'm 4 going to defer to my colleagues. 5 But -- so on -- on the state level, I mean, 6 I was a staffer. I also, you know, have a lot of 7 friends across the board on -- you know, who are 8 lobbyists or advocates, et cetera. 9 And I just kind of wonder, you know, you had 10 mentioned that employers can be held liable for -- 11 under the Human Rights Law, to non-employees 12 performing work in the workplace, et cetera, on the 13 State side. 14 In -- in our -- in our workplace, can members 15 of the LCA also report to DHR? 16 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: I'm sorry, "LCA"? 17 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: Yeah, that's the -- 18 that's the -- the legislative correspondents. 19 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: Yes. We have 20 jurisdiction over legislative members, yes. 21 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: No, no. The 22 correspondents, like, news -- 23 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: Oh, (indiscernible 24 cross-talking) -- 25 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: -- news folks, yeah, the 155 1 press? 2 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: Yes, they can file. 3 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: So they're supposed to 4 file with you, or they're supposed to file somewhere 5 else? 6 Because they have their own bosses, 7 et cetera, in their newspaper (indiscernible). 8 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: If you could just give 9 me an example of what you're saying, maybe I'll 10 understand better. 11 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: So, uhm -- so, you know, 12 there's a couple of young people in the pressroom 13 that have told me that certain things have happened 14 with certain people. 15 Like, how do -- where do they go to file, and 16 do they file with you? 17 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: We have jurisdiction 18 over public- and private-sector employees, so they 19 can file with us. 20 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: So should they be filing 21 with you? 22 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Yes, absolutely. 23 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: So they should be? 24 That's like the -- what they're -- where they 25 should go? 156 1 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Yes. 2 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: Okay. 3 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Yes. 4 D.C. DANA SUSSMAN: Just to clarify, is the 5 question around, they're experiencing harassment by 6 their supervisors, or by other -- in -- with -- with 7 respect to different, sort of like, organizational 8 relationships? 9 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: It could be 10 organizational, it could be within the pressroom, it 11 could be within the Legislature, it could be within 12 staff. 13 I don't. 14 But I'm just saying, like, for example, 15 within -- we have a lot of different roles in the 16 Legislature, for example. There's a lot of 17 different folks working around each other. 18 You know, so what happens when there's 19 somebody from organizations or from corporations 20 that are not within our body, like, there's 21 something that happens to them, where should they 22 file? 23 That was the question. 24 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Yeah, I would -- I would 25 advise them to file with us. Like I said, we don't 157 1 turn anyone away. 2 And if it's not something under our 3 jurisdiction, we would advise them where to go. 4 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: Would that be under your 5 jurisdiction, I guess? 6 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: I'd have to hear the 7 facts of the case first, yeah. 8 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: So, for -- I mean, 9 (indiscernible) -- so, for example, a person who is 10 in the pressroom, and, something happened to them 11 with, say, you know, another press person within the 12 LCA. 13 ASSEMBLYMAN BUCHWALD: Different employer. 14 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: Different employers, 15 different newspapers. 16 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: When did this happen? 17 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: I don't know. 18 [Laughter.] 19 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: I don't know. 20 D.C. DANA SUSSMAN: So, if I can jump in, if 21 this happened within New York City -- 22 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: Yeah, within New York 23 (indiscernible). 24 D.C. DANA SUSSMAN: -- uhm -- the -- uhm -- 25 so employers are responsible to protect their 158 1 employees from discrimination or harassment, 2 based -- even when it's conducted by non-employees, 3 when they're aware of the conduct, and, essentially, 4 have acquiesced in the conduct. 5 So that would -- that would happen in the 6 context of, a customer at a restaurant, who 7 regularly harasses a server, or, you know, one press 8 outlet and another press outlet, and the employer of 9 the person who is being harassed knows that this is 10 happening and doesn't do anything about it. 11 So we interpret our law, and the standards of 12 liability require, that, if you are aware that your 13 employee is experiencing harassment or 14 discrimination, based on any of our protected 15 categories, by a non-employee; by a client, a 16 customer, a vendor, an independent contractor, you 17 are obligated to intervene, and, if you don't, you 18 could be liable. 19 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: And that's the same for 20 us. 21 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: Uhm -- so, I mean, 22 I just wondered if it would be helpful, since we go 23 through orientation, our staff go through 24 orientation, like, people who work around us, should 25 they go through orientation? Should there be some 159 1 kind of training? 2 We have ethics training, but... 3 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: I think the more that a 4 person is trained and knows their rights, and the 5 law, the better off everyone is. 6 Yes, absolutely. 7 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: Is there any suggestions 8 on that? 9 D.C. DANA SUSSMAN: Well, I mean, I think I'm 10 outside of my purview, geographically. 11 But, you know, the commission does free 12 in-person trainings. We have our online training 13 now as well. 14 Anywhere within the five boroughs we will go, 15 and we will train people on their rights or their 16 obligations under the City Human Rights Law. 17 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: Thank you. 18 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: Thank you. 19 SENATOR BIAGGI: Senator Skoufis. 20 SENATOR SKOUFIS: Thanks very much, 21 Madam Chair, and thanks for your leadership on this, 22 and my fellow Co-Chairs. 23 I thank you for your testimony today, and 24 your willingness to answer questions. 25 I have a number of questions about, building 160 1 off of some of my colleagues, sort of the 2 legislative role of the division, and these 3 questions are for the State, pardon me. 4 But first I want to ask a parochial question, 5 if I may. 6 So I pulled up your website when you 7 mentioned the regional offices that you have in the 8 division, to see where they are. 9 It was news to me that you had regional 10 offices. 11 So, correct me if I'm wrong, but it looks 12 like you have three in New York City, two in 13 Long Island, one in White Plains, one in Albany. 14 And then there are two, sort of, enormous 15 swaths of the state where you do not have any 16 physical presence: 17 One, which I don't represent, so I'm not 18 going to speak about, is in the North Country, where 19 there is no presence at all in the entire 20 north-of-Albany area. 21 And there's zero presence in the Mid-Hudson 22 Valley, you know, which I think is larger than the 23 size of Connecticut. 24 So that's concerning to me. 25 And I don't know if I have a question 161 1 associated with this, but feel free to respond if 2 you'd like. 3 But, you know, I do encourage you to please 4 consider that fact, that, you know, you have this 5 enormous Hudson Valley Region, basically, north of 6 White Plains, in between White Plains and Albany, 7 that has no presence. 8 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Thank you for that. 9 I had mentioned earlier that, you know, part 10 of my wish list was additional regional offices. 11 We do have memorandum of understanding with 12 other local human-resources commissions -- sorry, 13 local human rights commissions, and relationships 14 with local human rights commissions around the 15 state. 16 We are actually going to be conducting an 17 outreach event with the Orange County Human Rights 18 Commission very soon. 19 So we do, despite us not having actual 20 offices, DHR offices, in those areas, we do work 21 with the local offices, to make our presence known. 22 And we also do receive complaints from the local 23 offices around the country. 24 But I do appreciate that. 25 And as I stated, I would love additional 162 1 resources to open more offices. 2 SENATOR SKOUFIS: Okay, thank you. 3 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Thank you. 4 SENATOR SKOUFIS: You know, you made it clear 5 that you two, as deputy commissioners, don't have 6 the authority, by the sounds of it, to weigh in on 7 the legislative proposals that we're all discussing 8 here, that we're certainly discussing, the 9 Legislature. 10 Do you believe the acting commissioner would 11 have the authority, if she were here, to weigh in on 12 the division's position? 13 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: I don't know if she'd 14 have the authority; but, more so, I don't know if 15 she'd have the knowledge yet, since she just -- she 16 just started a month ago. 17 And, she's incredibly bright and smart -- 18 SENATOR SKOUFIS: Yeah, no, I'm not speaking 19 specific to the individual. 20 I'm speaking specific to the position in the 21 division. 22 Does the commissioner, by virtue of the 23 position, you know, have the wherewithal and the 24 authority to, you know, answer us in a way that you 25 can't vis-a-vis these bills? 163 1 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: I can say that she would 2 probably have more authority than we do to speak on 3 certain questions that you haven't gotten an answer 4 from us on, yes. 5 SENATOR SKOUFIS: Okay. 6 You've made it clear -- similarly, you've 7 made it clear that, while you're aware, you're not 8 familiar with the program-bill process within the 9 division. 10 Is the commissioner typically familiar with 11 that process? 12 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: I can't say with 13 certainty if she's familiar with that process 14 because I'm not involved in the process. 15 SENATOR SKOUFIS: Okay. 16 It's commonplace, when we in the Legislature 17 pass bills that touch on either agency operations or 18 an agency's purview, that, while the bill is 19 pending, and the governor has yet to sign or veto a 20 bill, the executive chamber will reach out to that 21 agency for a recommendation as to whether to sign or 22 veto that particular bill. 23 Does that -- do you know if that happens with 24 the division, when there are bills that pass the 25 Legislature, does the executive chamber reach out to 164 1 the division for a recommendation? 2 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: (Indiscernible) 3 Senator Biaggi today, that there is communications. 4 However, as to anything particular to DHR on 5 that, I don't know. I'm not privy to those 6 conversations. 7 SENATOR SKOUFIS: Do you suspect that if any 8 or all of the bills in the package that have been 9 proposed here, pass, do you expect, or suspect, that 10 the executive chamber would reach out to the 11 division for a recommendation as to whether to sign 12 or veto those bills? 13 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: Again, not being not 14 familiar with the procedures, I really can't give an 15 answer, but it sounds like they will be reaching 16 out. 17 SENATOR SKOUFIS: Okay. 18 So it sound -- if, indeed, that is what 19 happens, the division will have a position on these 20 bills. 21 But it just so happens, at least till now, 22 the position won't be helpful to us in the 23 Legislature as we consider whether to pass the 24 bills. It will exclusively be helpful to the 25 Governor as to whether to sign or veto the bills. 165 1 So it doesn't seem like it's a matter of 2 whether the division is comfortable taking a 3 position; it's a matter of timing. 4 And I would encourage you to go back to the 5 commissioner and your higher-ups, and accelerate 6 that timing. 7 Now, if I may ask, in light of these 8 questions, can I ask where the commissioner is 9 today, the acting commissioner? 10 And, no, I understand, if there was a family 11 emergency, or something came up. 12 Is there a reason she is not here? 13 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: I am not aware of where 14 she is today. 15 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: I came straight from 16 home, so I don't know. She may be at the office. 17 SENATOR SKOUFIS: Where's the office? 18 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: It's in The Bronx. And 19 I come from Brooklyn. 20 SENATOR SKOUFIS: Okay. 21 All right. That's all I have. 22 I look forward to taking up, as Chair of the 23 Government Operations Committee, the acting 24 commissioner's nomination. 25 Thanks. 166 1 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Assemblyman Epstein. 2 ASSEMBLYMAN EPSTEIN: Thank you all for being 3 here for so long. I really do appreciate all your 4 time. 5 I wanted to go back to the conversation about 6 nondisclosure agreements, and the usefulness of them 7 for complainants. 8 I'm wondering what, both, on the City and 9 State level, how you feel about them, and whether 10 they've exceeded their useful life, in regards to 11 ongoing issues of harassment, and NDAs really 12 covering that up as a strategy? 13 D.C. DANA SUSSMAN: I think -- you know, from 14 my perspective, I'm a former employment lawyer, 15 representing plaintiffs, and I think that it's a 16 real -- there's a real challenge here. 17 I think some people really do want to resolve 18 cases quietly, and move on. 19 And, in some circumstances, there are workers 20 who have leverage in that, and they will bargain 21 that. And that is something that happens in 22 negotiations; that is, I'm talking outside of the 23 commission process. 24 On the other side, the systemic silencing of 25 victims is something -- and survivors, is something 167 1 that I think we are all, you know, coming to terms 2 with, and thinking about whether this is sort of, we 3 need to really shift the paradigm around how 4 these -- how we have these conversations, how these 5 settlements are negotiated. 6 And so I think, whenever proposals are made 7 around monitoring of nondisclosures or eliminating 8 them, I think there is a balancing, or at least a 9 recognition, that, in some -- in some context, 10 people -- it -- it -- it could potentially remove 11 some -- some leverage, for lack of a better word, 12 for plaintiffs when they're seeking to resolve cases 13 more expeditiously or quietly. 14 I'm not taking any position one way or the 15 other. 16 I'm just acknowledging that that is a 17 consideration as we think about nondisclosures. 18 From the City perspective, it is not -- it is 19 our position that it is not in the public interest 20 to ever include nondisclosure agreements in 21 conciliations that the City is a party to, for that 22 exact reason; that public disclosure and information 23 is vital. 24 But -- so I'm just putting out there, that 25 I think that this is quite a complex issue, and I'm 168 1 glad that we're having this conversation. 2 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: I have to agree with 3 that. 4 And I'm also very satisfied that, you know, 5 with the new law from last year, that it's the 6 complainant's preference; they're given that power 7 to decide if they want it. You know, it's not 8 something where the respondent can say, you have to 9 put it in. 10 You know, they're using that as some kind of 11 leverage. 12 So, I'm glad that the complainants are given 13 that option, and it's only the complainant's 14 preference. 15 The respondent can bring it up, but it's only 16 up to the complainant to make that decision. 17 So that makes me happy. 18 ASSEMBLYMAN EPSTEIN: But don't you think 19 sometimes respondents have bargaining power in that 20 conversation, and want to use the NDA as a leverage 21 tool to get to that agreement? 22 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: I think they, yeah, 23 respondents definitely do. 24 But, when we're a party to those agreements, 25 we have to make sure that the complainants want to 169 1 be, or are satisfied with all of the provisions of 2 the settlement agreement. 3 Absolutely, they try with the bargaining 4 power. 5 ASSEMBLYMAN EPSTEIN: And have you seen 6 situations where that's the reason that a settlement 7 agreement falls apart, is the failure for a 8 complainant to want to sign an NDA? 9 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: I have not. 10 I could find out from the attorneys who 11 handle the case, where they do. 12 But, personally, I have not. 13 ASSEMBLYMAN EPSTEIN: Yeah, it would be good 14 to know how often this comes up where a complainant 15 doesn't want to sign the NDA, and it's in a 16 situation where the settlement will fall apart 17 without the signing of an NDA. 18 So this issue about, going back to statute of 19 limitations as well, you know, obviously, we've 20 heard a lot, especially around abuse situations 21 in -- you know, in faith-based institutions, a lot 22 around people becoming much aware of the abuse, and 23 really come to terms with it, especially with 24 someone who is a leader, like a faith leader or a 25 mentor. And, really, it takes a long time for 170 1 people to get to that space where they can really 2 process it. Lots of people, you know, we know are 3 in therapy. 4 I'm wondering if, based on more information 5 we have right now, we really need to relook at the 6 statute of limitations, based on a whole host of 7 information, realizing that the victim, who is 8 really likely to be in a, you know, powerless 9 position against the victimizer, really suppresses 10 the information, and it does takes extended periods 11 of time? 12 D.C. DANA SUSSMAN: So as the agency that's 13 now implementing a longer statute of limitations, 14 specifically for gender-based harassment claims and 15 employment, I think that that was the recognition, 16 that this -- while -- you know, that is not to 17 minimize the trauma of all the other forms of 18 discrimination, so I want to be clear about that. 19 And -- and -- we are thinking about this as 20 sort of a first-in-time process, so that, you know, 21 we're -- we've now implemented extended statute of 22 limitations in this area. 23 And I think it's a continuing conversation 24 around maybe moving up every other protected 25 category to that same extension, or that same new 171 1 reality. 2 But I think that, again, because of the 3 bravery and the courage of so many people here 4 today, we have a renewed recognition that one year 5 to file with the commission was just insufficient 6 for these kinds of claims. 7 And I think a broader conversation around 8 bringing in other kinds of claims into that 9 extension is well worth having. 10 But, you know, as my colleagues mentioned, 11 the truth of the matter is, the broader you make the 12 statute of limitations, the more cases we will get. 13 We are getting more cases, just as we -- as 14 we brought in the categories of protected 15 categories. 16 And so we really want to ensure that there 17 are resources; that it's met with these broadened -- 18 our broadened powers and jurisdiction mean more 19 cases, and that could mean longer processing times. 20 That's just the reality, and a challenge that 21 we face. 22 ASSEMBLYMAN EPSTEIN: And that -- and, again, 23 that will be our job, to ensure there are additional 24 resources. 25 But just to hear from the State on that 172 1 issue. 2 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: Sorry, in terms of the 3 statute of limitations, could you repeat that 4 question? 5 I got caught up (indiscernible 6 cross-talking). 7 ASSEMBLYMAN EPSTEIN: Yeah, I just -- just -- 8 we -- you know, we were just talking a lot about 9 abuse and, you know, sexual assaults, in the context 10 of religious institutions, we've seen extending of 11 the statute of limitations because it takes a long 12 time to -- especially with someone who's in a 13 position of power or a mentor or a religious leader, 14 for people to be able to process that abuse. 15 And in some -- you know, multiple years, in 16 some situations, we've seen people take decades, 17 especially when they're younger and dealing with 18 someone who's in that position of power. 19 Is it really a time to really look at these 20 statute of limitations and think about this in that 21 context, knowing all the trauma that people are 22 experiencing? 23 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: I mean, it's awful. 24 I know people who have been subjected to it. 25 And to hear that your claim can't brought is 173 1 heartbreaking. 2 That being said, if it's changed, we'll 3 enforce it. That's what I can say on it. 4 I mean, it's awful. 5 ASSEMBLYMAN EPSTEIN: Thank you. 6 Just one more question, if I can, 7 I appreciate that. 8 So, I know we've talked about, that statute 9 of limitation runs from the last, you know... 10 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Date of 11 discrimination -- 12 ASSEMBLYMAN EPSTEIN: ...the day of 13 discrimination. 14 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: -- alleged 15 (indiscernible cross-talking). 16 ASSEMBLYMAN EPSTEIN: But people in power 17 positions have ongoing power against people. You 18 know, someone who's a former employer can be a 19 reference for years, and that -- hold that, or, 20 reputational interests. 21 I mean, how do you view that, someone who can 22 use their power and privilege against someone to -- 23 you know, is that an ongoing abuse? 24 Because you can say, well, if you disclose 25 this, I'm going to tarnish your name. I'm not 174 1 provide good reference. 2 And, how does that play out in that 3 conversation? 4 D.C. DANA SUSSMAN: So, unfortunately, the 5 stand -- or, the statutory framework under the City 6 law is, employee or applicant, essentially. So it 7 does require that relationship. 8 I think, when that relationship ends, it's 9 likely that that would be the last adverse action in 10 the employment context. 11 There may be other torts, potentially, around 12 reputational harm or intentional infliction of 13 emotional distress, or other causes of action. 14 But, from my understanding, and maybe there 15 is area for case law to develop, or other, you know, 16 ways to get at this issue, that the statute assumes, 17 essentially, that employee-employer relationship or 18 applicant-employer relationship. 19 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: It's basically the same, 20 when the employer-employee relationship terminates, 21 I think the ability to file terminates. 22 ASSEMBLYMAN EPSTEIN: Thank you, all. 23 And thank you both, for the Assembly and the 24 Senate Chairs, for your leadership here. 25 Thank you. 175 1 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Assemblywoman Rosenthal. 2 ASSEMBLYWOMAN ROSENTHAL: (Microphone off.) 3 Okay, can you hear me? 4 Sort of? 5 Okay. 6 Thanks for being here. 7 I just have a couple of questions. 8 Do you record the interviews you conduct with 9 people who come forward? 10 (Microphone on.) 11 ASSEMBLYWOMAN ROSENTHAL: Oh, thank you. 12 Do you record interviews? 13 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: No, we do not. 14 ASSEMBLYWOMAN ROSENTHAL: (Microphone off.) 15 Do you think you -- what is your view on that 16 policy? 17 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: It's not our policy to 18 record interviews. 19 ASSEMBLYWOMAN ROSENTHAL: Right, do you think 20 that's the right policy, or not? 21 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: I mean, it's -- if I 22 take it from -- back to my litigation days, you 23 know, the issue with recording any statement is, is, 24 perhaps, you know, you really are locking your 25 witness in to the statement. And if they are to 176 1 take the stand, it becomes a matter of 2 cross-examination, not only if they're different, 3 but about things they didn't say. 4 So I, potentially, could see an issue, as a 5 former litigator, being that way. But it's just not 6 our policy to record the witnesses. 7 ASSEMBLYWOMAN ROSENTHAL: And the City as 8 well? 9 D.C. DANA SUSSMAN: I will have to confirm 10 the practices with our deputy commissioner for law 11 enforcement. 12 I can get back to you on that. 13 ASSEMBLYWOMAN ROSENTHAL: Okay, great. 14 You mentioned 8 languages, and 45 languages. 15 What -- what do you -- how do you treat 16 people who are hearing- and visually-impaired? 17 D.C. DANA SUSSMAN: So we have systems in 18 place where we can do video conferencing, bring in 19 ASL interpreters. 20 We have looped rooms, with a hearing loop. 21 And we do have, I believe, on staff at least 22 one staff person who is ASL-fluent. 23 So we have accommodations that we make, so 24 that, in real time, people are able to file with us. 25 And, again, if we -- we will call -- we will 177 1 screen folks on the phone, or however they reach us, 2 either via e-mail or on the phone or in person, and 3 make those accommodations available for that initial 4 interview so that there's no delay. 5 ASSEMBLYWOMAN ROSENTHAL: Okay. And 6 sometimes ASL is not enough. 7 So do you -- how do you treat people who -- 8 for whom that is not enough? 9 D.C. DANA SUSSMAN: What we will do on the 10 call, on the intake call, which is, typically, about 11 a 5- to 15-minute screening call, before they will, 12 either, come in to meet with an attorney, or, set up 13 a call -- a subsequent call to speak with an 14 attorney if they are unable to come to the office, 15 we will identify any accommodations that they need. 16 And we have contracts with providers of 17 accommodations, whether it -- whatever -- whether 18 it's CART services, an interpreter, or any other 19 need for that person, we will make that available to 20 them for their -- for whatever they are meeting with 21 our attorneys. 22 ASSEMBLYWOMAN ROSENTHAL: Okay. 23 And did you mention, visually-impaired, what 24 you do for them? 25 D.C. DANA SUSSMAN: So we have trained staff 178 1 who can work with people who -- if they are -- if 2 they choose, or are unable to come into the office, 3 for an interview, which is our typical practice, 4 they -- we will -- we can do it over the phone. We 5 can do it by video conference if that's a 6 preference. 7 And then, you know, if they do come to meet 8 with us one-on-one, we can work with them. And we 9 have disability-rights specialists who we work with. 10 Whether the claim relates to the disability 11 or not, we ensure that they are given the same 12 access to resources and to attorney time and 13 everything else as any other person. 14 ASSEMBLYWOMAN ROSENTHAL: (Microphone on.) 15 Have you had such cases? 16 D.C. DANA SUSSMAN: I can say with almost 17 certain confidence that we have. 18 I don't have the numbers with me today, but 19 I'm happy to check back in. 20 ASSEMBLYWOMAN ROSENTHAL: Okay. Thank you. 21 What about the State, same question? 22 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: Very similar. 23 If it's a hearing-impaired, we make sure we 24 have the translators. 25 Our website is also accessible for both. 179 1 If they're visually-impaired, we have video 2 conferencing. We have the telephonic conferences. 3 We can go visit them. 4 Very similar to the City as well. 5 ASSEMBLYWOMAN ROSENTHAL: Okay. And have you 6 had cases? 7 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: I'm trying to think, in 8 particular, it would be the hearing side of it. 9 I believe we have had the hearing-impaired, 10 and we have brought in a tran -- a sign-language 11 interpreter. I'm sorry. 12 ASSEMBLYWOMAN ROSENTHAL: And -- 13 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: I can find out if -- 14 more data, if you'd like. 15 ASSEMBLYWOMAN ROSENTHAL: -- okay, that would 16 be great. 17 I apologize if this was addressed earlier. 18 Do you have interns from various legislators, 19 agencies, do they file with you? Do they know to 20 file with you? Have they filed with you? 21 On both levels. 22 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: We do have 23 jurisdictions over interns. 24 In our education, and whenever we go out to 25 our conferences, where we're actually meeting 180 1 interns and, potentially, bringing them on, we bring 2 all our literature to all the different places we 3 go. 4 When we hold events at the different schools, 5 such as New York Law School, or Touro Law School, or 6 different colleges, we bring all of that out to try 7 and make the interns aware. 8 But we do have jurisdiction over interns. 9 ASSEMBLYWOMAN ROSENTHAL: But -- because -- 10 and I have legislation on this: 11 If there's a college student, and he or she 12 goes to work at a private corporation, they are 13 usually not trained. 14 How would they even know to come to speak 15 with you? 16 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: I guess it would be a 17 matter of looking at our website, but we have to do 18 more education and outreach to let the colleges 19 know. 20 ASSEMBLYWOMAN ROSENTHAL: But -- but -- 21 right. And that's my -- my legislation would 22 require training of interns. 23 But, actually, there should be training of -- 24 of everyone in every setting, whether they're 25 not-for-profit, corporate, university. 181 1 But in terms of, do you know if any 2 universities undertake training of people who will 3 go on to be interns? 4 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: I am not aware, but 5 maybe Dana knows. 6 D.C. DANA SUSSMAN: We partner pretty closely 7 with the CUNY system and with other educational 8 institutions. 9 But, I'm not aware of internal practices at 10 those institutions around sort of a "know your 11 rights" component when they go out into the 12 workforce or into summer internships. 13 What we do every year, and I'm just making a 14 note to myself to make sure that this is teed up 15 for -- for our agency, is a social-media campaign. 16 You know, not -- not -- we don't have the resources 17 to sort of place ads, but to at least to promote the 18 rights of interns to be protected from 19 discrimination and harassment in the workplace, 20 which we usually do around this time every year, in 21 advance of, sort of, the summer-work and internship 22 season. 23 And we also partner with our city agencies 24 that place young people in with internships and work 25 experiences, like the department of youth and 182 1 community development, to make -- to get trained and 2 understand what their rights are. 3 And for the employers who sign up to receive 4 interns and students, that they understand what 5 their obligations are. 6 ASSEMBLYWOMAN ROSENTHAL: So there's no 7 requirement to, for example, have a poster that 8 says, you are protected, or, here are the rules that 9 your emp -- your -- maybe not employer, because many 10 are not paid, but, the people who work for you, you 11 know, for a period of time, have to -- are protected 12 by, or have to follow, this is what you have to 13 follow? 14 I mean, there's no such provision in City or 15 State law; right? 16 D.C. DANA SUSSMAN: There is a notice 17 requirement in City law, specifically around sexual 18 harassment, and that is, a notice you receive upon 19 employment, and a poster that goes up in English and 20 Spanish, and we have languages, but the mandate is 21 English and Spanish, that has your rights, your 22 resources, some common scenarios of sexual 23 harassment. 24 And that should -- that is supposed to be up 25 in all places of employment, regardless of whether 183 1 you have unpaid staff or paid staff or interns. 2 That is a requirement as of last year, 2018. 3 ASSEMBLYWOMAN ROSENTHAL: And the State? 4 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: We do have 5 jurisdiction, whether they are paid or unpaid. 6 As to the requirement, I would have to get 7 back to you on that, unless my colleague knows. 8 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: I'm not aware of the 9 requirement. 10 ASSEMBLYWOMAN ROSENTHAL: Okay, I'd be 11 interested, because interns often feel they have no 12 leverage, they have no rights. They're dependent on 13 their boss's, you know, attitude toward them, if 14 they want to build a career, or, examine that 15 business to see if they want to proceed with that 16 kind of a job. 17 And they might even be more hesitant than a 18 paid employee because they really don't have rights. 19 D.C. DANA SUSSMAN: Well, I would just 20 clarify, they do have rights. 21 ASSEMBLYWOMAN ROSENTHAL: Well, I'm saying 22 it, in their mind. 23 D.C. DANA SUSSMAN: Understood. 24 I just want to make clear. 25 ASSEMBLYWOMAN ROSENTHAL: Yes, you're right, 184 1 you are correct. 2 D.C. DANA SUSSMAN: Yes. 3 ASSEMBLYWOMAN ROSENTHAL: But, you know, they 4 can just be -- 5 D.C. DANA SUSSMAN: Understood. 6 ASSEMBLYWOMAN ROSENTHAL: -- fired. 7 And if a person is an employee, they might 8 have rights that an intern may not think that they 9 do. 10 D.C. DANA SUSSMAN: Understood. 11 ASSEMBLYWOMAN ROSENTHAL: Okay. 12 Thank you. 13 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Assemblywoman Walker. 14 ASSEMBLYWOMAN WALKER: Wow, I guess that 15 means we've gone around the world, and we're back 16 again. 17 So, I wanted to thank you for your time here 18 today, and I understand it's been long. 19 But I did just want to ask a couple of 20 questions, now that I feel like -- I feel a little 21 bit better now, I'm in my mojo. 22 #MeToo -- the #MeToo movement sort of was 23 brought about by Tarana Burke, in reference to Black 24 women and girls being able, and being comfortable, 25 with coming forward with our stories, because, in 185 1 many instances, we're left out of the conversation. 2 We've seen in imagery, and in many societal 3 norms, that Black women and girls are in -- we're 4 unable to be violated, sexually. We are, you know, 5 portrayed as natural sexual beings and/or oversexed. 6 We're categorized in those sort of languages 7 as well. 8 And, so, one of the most pervasive locations 9 where I've been able to hear stories of sexual 10 violence taking place against Black women and girls 11 are in the criminal justice system. 12 So -- so I have two questions. 13 One: When you're doing your outreach, are 14 there any particular organizations that you work 15 with in terms of promoting your policy directives? 16 And I'll say, with the State, now that, you 17 know, you guys are going to be recalibrating, 18 I would imagine, what the outreach and coordination 19 is amongst groups, are there any organizations that 20 you've worked with in order to address the 21 particular instances of women of color? 22 And, in addition to that, with respect to 23 instances where they're reported, do you keep -- do 24 you keep records with respect to tracking -- 25 race-based tracking of your complaints, and 186 1 throughout different agencies? 2 And, lastly, with respect to the criminal 3 justice system, are we going into the correctional 4 facilities, juvenile detention facilities, and 5 providing training therein to, both, the individuals 6 who are incarcerated there, as well as to the 7 employees -- employ -- yes, employees of the 8 institution? 9 D.C. DANA SUSSMAN: I can start, and try to 10 answer as much as I can. 11 So the organizations that we've worked with, 12 I was just kind of doing a mental list of the 13 organizations that we've worked with specifically on 14 sexual harassment, and I can list them if that -- if 15 that's is useful. 16 And many of them are here, or will be 17 speaking shortly, I hope. 18 You know, Girls for Gender Equity, The Sexual 19 Harassment Working Group, National Domestic Workers 20 Alliance, Make the Road a Better Balance, and other 21 initiatives. We're working with LDF. 22 We work with -- with respect to going into 23 spaces where there are young people incarcerated, we 24 do a lot of work in the correctional facilities 25 in New York City, specifically focused on the 187 1 Fair Chance Act, you know, the "Ban the Box" 2 protections in New York City. So once you leave -- 3 once you have -- well, in many circumstances it's, 4 once you've been incarcerated, you have employment 5 protections in the workplace. You can't be asked 6 about your criminal history. 7 So we focus much of our education on that 8 in -- in facilities. 9 But, I recognize that we should be doing 10 more, and it's not that -- you are not only your 11 criminal record, and so we should be recognizing. 12 And I think we do speak to more protective 13 categories in that outreach. 14 But, certainly, I take your direction here, 15 that we can be doing far more -- more, sort of, 16 comprehensive education outreach in corrections 17 facilities. 18 And then, tracking, so one of the complicated 19 factors for us in tracking is that, we don't ask for 20 demographic information. We -- people will 21 self-identify, and that's recorded as part of their 22 case, essentially. 23 So it's, really, protections under our law 24 are actual or perceived race, gender, disability, 25 and everything else. 188 1 And so -- and especially, you know, 2 particularly with respect to something like 3 immigration status, we do not keep any records of 4 that. And a claim, because you are being 5 discriminated against based on your immigration 6 status, we would charge as actual or perceived in -- 7 very intentionally, to make sure that we are not 8 highlighting anyone's actual or perceived 9 immigration status. 10 So, you know, the -- I think we can look at 11 cases alleging race discrimination, and then look at 12 those individual case files and see sort of what the 13 facts are. 14 But, from a 1,000-foot view, or 10,000-foot 15 view, the demographic information is not something 16 that we are tracking, both for privacy reasons, and 17 also because it's not -- it's not vital to -- to the 18 case across the board. 19 It may -- certain aspects of your -- of your 20 personal identity are, but not all of it. And so we 21 aren't keeping that information, as far as -- 22 ASSEMBLYWOMAN WALKER: So I guess what makes 23 me think, you know, whether or not -- you know, 24 tracking, whether it's important or it's not 25 important I guess is yet to be seen. 189 1 But, in many instances, I would imagine, not 2 all, that the sexual harassment of Black women can 3 also be coupled as, you know, race-based 4 discrimination as well. 5 And so, I guess, to the extent that, you 6 know, they may or may not be mutually exclusive, 7 it's important to be -- to know this information. 8 And -- and I'll -- and I'll say that, you 9 know, a lot of -- in a lot of instances, we like to 10 say, you know, we don't see color. Right? 11 So that's almost what I hear, like, the 12 agency is representing. 13 But the fact of the matter remains, is 14 that -- that we are a community of many hues. 15 And a part of the conversation is being sort 16 of left out of a very important conversation, and 17 that -- and that community are Black -- is -- is -- 18 represents Black women. Right? 19 And, so, I just want to, I guess, you know, 20 put -- put a -- a -- a -- I don't, a star, or a 21 point, or something, to be able to say that, you 22 know, I appreciate the space; like, I appreciate the 23 fact that #MeToo has arisen, Time's Up is here. 24 But also the National Black Women's Justice 25 Institute released a very good report about -- it 190 1 was called "Expanding Our Frame: Deepening Our 2 Demands for Safety and Sexual in" -- "Safety and 3 Healing for Black Survivors of Sexual Violence." 4 And so I guess this is the one place where 5 I would appreciate, you know, for the agency to see 6 color, and to recognize that this may be a coupling 7 of maybe some race-based discrimination as well 8 sexual violence in the workplace. 9 D.C. DANA SUSSMAN: And I would just like to 10 put an extra exclamation point, or a checkmark, or a 11 star, that, you know, I think the -- again, speaking 12 anecdotally, and speaking with, and being very -- in 13 very close touch with the supervisor for our 14 gender-based harassment unit, highlights exactly 15 that point: that most of the cases we see, 16 gender-based harassment intersects with race, or 17 immigration status, or national origin, or a 18 multiple of those things. 19 That it is more -- and -- and the statistics 20 bear out, as we've seen, that women of color are 21 more vulnerable to and experience sexual harassment 22 at higher rates than White women. 23 And that is what we see at the commission, 24 and we recognize that, and -- and find -- and that 25 is central to the work that we do. 191 1 And so I just want to reiterate that that is 2 very much at the center of our work. 3 SENATOR BIAGGI: Senator Liu. 4 ASSEMBLYWOMAN WALKER: Hi -- oh. 5 SENATOR LIU: Thank you, Madam Chair. 6 I apologize. I -- 7 SENATOR BIAGGI: Sorry, Senator Liu, one 8 moment. 9 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: As to whether, and 10 where, we've done the outreach, whether -- and to 11 the particular group, I would have to get back to 12 you on that. 13 In terms of tracking, we -- I wouldn't call 14 it tracking, but, our data, we should be able to 15 pull based on race or based on sexual harassment. 16 We likely could pull that data if you'd like 17 us to get back to you with it. I don't have it 18 today. 19 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: We do have that data. 20 But I believe the commissioner's assessment 21 indicated, we also have individuals that file on 22 multiple bases; so, people will file based on race 23 and sexual harassment. 24 So it's hard to take apart specific cases 25 because, oftentimes, people are discriminated on 192 1 multiple bases. 2 But we do have the data. 3 As for us going into juvenile and 4 correctional agencies to train, not since -- not 5 that I'm aware of. 6 But I can bring that suggestion back under 7 advisement. 8 SENATOR BIAGGI: My apologies to 9 Assemblywoman Walker. 10 Senator Liu. 11 SENATOR LIU: Thank you, Madam Chair. 12 I just have one more question to follow up, 13 and that is: 14 On more than one occasion, 15 Commissioner Martinez, you had mentioned that -- 16 once again, you're proud that you have a relatively 17 high rate of cases with probable cause at 18 25 percent? 19 Did I hear you correctly? 20 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Yes. 21 SENATOR LIU: All right. 22 So does that mean 75 percent of complaints 23 are unfounded; have no probable cause? 24 What does that mean? 25 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Well, basically, for all 193 1 of the cases that we do investigate, that go through 2 the investigation stage, 25 percent of them we find 3 probable cause in. 4 Some of the cases do not finish the 5 investigation stage; they settle. 6 Some of them are withdrawn by the 7 complainants. They decide to maybe pursue other 8 avenues, or, they settle outside, privately. 9 But, yes, that's a higher rate than most 10 other cases. 11 SENATOR LIU: Okay, so "25 percent," that 12 means that your division, ultimately, has to 13 adjudicate, prosecute, I don't know what the words 14 are, but, those -- it's 25 percent of the complaints 15 that come to the division that, ultimately, you take 16 action on? 17 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Sexual-harassment 18 complaints. 19 So -- 20 SENATOR LIU: Okay, so these are 21 specifically -- 22 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Correct. 23 SENATOR LIU: -- because that was my next 24 question. 25 These are not all complaints; these are 194 1 specifically sexual-harassment complaints? 2 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Correct. 3 So after a probable-cause determination is 4 made, and the 25 percent is unique to 5 sexual-harassment complaints, then those cases move 6 along to a public hearing. 7 So those -- those are the -- 25 percent of 8 those cases are the ones that don't settle before 9 the investigation ends. They could settle 10 afterwards. 11 SENATOR LIU: And that's great about the 12 25 percent. 13 I'm just worried about the 75 percent. 14 And you're saying that -- it's not -- it's 15 not, as I characterize it, that they were 16 unfounded -- 17 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Right, right. 18 SENATOR LIU: -- but, in fact, a lot of 19 them -- 20 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Yep. 21 SENATOR LIU: -- get settled before it 22 actually gets to the public-hearing phase, which is 23 what you're talking about with the 25 percent? 24 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Yes. 25 SENATOR LIU: And so -- I mean, are most of 195 1 that 75 percent settled beforehand? 2 Because, you know, the -- at least the 3 newfound wisdom, is that it's very hard for somebody 4 to claim sexual harassment, and it's almost always 5 true. 6 So that's -- I'm trying to reconcile the 7 75 percent that are not considered cases with 8 probable cause, to our, you know, widely-accepted 9 thinking that people are not going to file 10 sexual-harassment assaults without probable cause. 11 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Right. 12 Well, you know, the hard truth of the matter 13 is, there are more cases that do get dismissed than 14 do lead to probable cause. That is the fact of the 15 matter. 16 SENATOR LIU: And is that dis -- okay. 17 Do you know why they get dismissed? 18 Is it because of a deficiency in the law? 19 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Not necessarily. 20 It could be for an abundance of reasons. 21 It's different for each case. 22 SENATOR LIU: But they're -- they're -- 23 I mean, it seems like one of those reasons would be 24 failure to meet this "severe and pervasive" 25 standard. 196 1 Would that be one of the reasons? 2 I mean, if some -- you know, if a woman feels 3 like they've been sexually harassed on the job, they 4 make a complaint, but, they don't -- they don't meet 5 the "severe or pervasive" standard, just as one 6 example, they would fall into that 75 percent 7 "without probable cause." 8 Is that correct or not correct? 9 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: It -- it's -- it's our 10 position that we take a very liberal interpretation 11 of the law. 12 So I -- I -- I can't -- I can't -- what's the 13 word I'm looking for? 14 SENATOR LIU: All right, look, I'm not trying 15 to badger anybody, but, Madam Chair -- 16 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: (Indiscernible 17 cross-talking) understand. 18 SENATOR LIU: -- I think we need to get the 19 commissioner here, somebody who -- you know, 20 I understand your -- your -- your responsibilities, 21 and the constraints that come with it. 22 But we need the commissioner to respond, if 23 not in a hearing, directly in writing, to these 24 kinds of questions. 25 And my last quick question is: How many 197 1 deputy commissioners are there? 2 Because you're -- there's two of you right 3 now. 4 How many deputy commissioners are there? 5 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: There's two deputy 6 commissioners -- 7 SENATOR LIU: That's it? 8 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: -- and one first deputy 9 commissioner. 10 Yes. 11 SENATOR LIU: Okay. So there's, basically -- 12 so there's a deputy -- a first deputy commissioner 13 above you, below the commissioner? 14 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: Correct. 15 SENATOR LIU: Okay. 16 I mean, I was hoping you would tell me that 17 there would be like 10 deputy commissioners, 18 because, in response to some of the legislators' 19 questions earlier, you kept saying: Well, I'm not 20 in charge of that, or, I don't know about this. 21 This is what I focus on. That's some -- that's 22 somebody else's job. 23 And that would be a stronger defense for 24 yourselves if there were like 10 deputy 25 commissioners. 198 1 But there are only two of you. 2 So you got the commissioner, you have the 3 first deputy commissioner, and then there's the two 4 of you. 5 So, you know, between the two of you, you 6 actually should be aware of everything that the 7 division is responsible for. 8 You may not know the exact details, but you 9 can't say "that's not my area," I'm sorry to say. 10 Thank you. 11 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: So a couple -- couple 12 follow-ups. 13 If a settlement is involved -- 14 Am I using the right term, "settlement"? 15 -- do those usually involve an admission of 16 some sort of wrongdoing? 17 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: No, they do not. 18 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: They do not. 19 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: They do not. 20 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Okay. I'll have a 21 follow-up to that later, I'll ask another panel. 22 But let me switch gears a little bit on 23 something else: the data. 24 Again, when -- the 25 percent where there's 25 probable cause, you find, and you go after the 199 1 incident, whatever complaint it was. 2 That usually leads to a charge or a penalty 3 or what -- what does it mean for the individual who 4 committed the harassment and/or the employer who 5 allowed it to happen? 6 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: After the probable cause 7 is made? 8 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Yes. 9 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: So after the probable 10 cause is made, it goes to the next stage, which is 11 the hearing stage, or the settlement before the 12 hearing. And that's when that is decided between 13 the parties, or, by the judge. 14 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: And then once a decision 15 is made there, what could it look like? 16 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: When you say 17 "decision," what do you mean, I'm sorry? 18 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: You mean a hearing 19 decision? 20 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Yes. 21 D.C. GINA MARTINEZ: By the judge. Okay. 22 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: So, a recommended 23 order, after a review of all the evidence that was 24 heard, any cross-examination, documentation, the ALJ 25 will make a recommended order. 200 1 It is then sent to both parties, the 2 respondent, as well as the complainant. They are 3 given 21 days to object to it in writing. 4 Once they do, their objections, plus the 5 record, is submitted to the commissioner's office, 6 where two adjudication counsels review the record, 7 and make a recommendation to the commissioner, which 8 could be, she could adopt it as it stands; she can 9 modify the ruling; and she could award more damages 10 or less damages, based on that. 11 And then once she makes the decision, the 12 order gets sent to the -- both sides. 13 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: So the damages could 14 involve certain a payment to the victim and/or 15 certain actions to be taken by the employer -- 16 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: Correct, it could -- 17 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: -- either internal, 18 or -- 19 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: -- front pay, back pay. 20 For mental health -- I mean, mental pain and 21 suffering, there could be damages for that. Order 22 to desist from the, or stop the, bad actions -- 23 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Okay. 24 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: -- instill a policy. 25 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: The reason I'm asking 201 1 this line of questions, I would like to -- I would 2 hope that we could discuss how to create an 3 environment where we could really try to stop the 4 pervasiveness of this when it involves individuals 5 who may come before you more than once. 6 So, as Labor Chair, I would like to -- you 7 know, we talk a lot about how to create a better 8 environment for job applicants, how to give them an 9 ability to know what environment they're going into, 10 or, an employer who wants to make sure that they 11 maintain a safe work environment, and not 12 inadvertently bring somebody onboard who has been 13 before your agency, you know, on multiple occasions. 14 So I would like to, at some point, maybe have 15 a follow-up conversation with you about this idea, 16 because I believe that we should provide that 17 information. 18 And if the data is made available or public 19 in some way, where, whether it's an affirmative 20 action that takes place, a particular step that 21 happens in an employment process, or, something 22 that's researchable, right, that's available to 23 folks, if I'm interested in working in a law firm: 24 How do I know -- how would I find out or be 25 aware of how many instances that firm, or employees 202 1 of that firm, have been before your agency? 2 Or, how would I be able to verify that the 3 supervisor that I'm going to be assigned to is 4 someone that I may not want to work for because of 5 his history. 6 That kind pressure point would really 7 encourage employers to address these issues much 8 more forcefully because, now, the reputation of 9 their environment is on the line. 10 Vice versa, the employer should have an 11 ability to know if the applicant that, on paper, 12 looks like well-rounded applicant, may be somebody 13 who has been in previous employment opportunities, 14 on multiple occasions, accused of something. 15 And there's really no mechanism for us, in 16 anything we've discussed so far, unless I'm wrong, 17 that would allow that information to be used the 18 right way; to prevent the wrong people to be in the 19 wrong places before this continues to occur. 20 D.C. MELISSA FRANCO: Sure. 21 I don't know that there is a mechanism. And 22 it does sound like this is definitely a larger 23 conversation that can be had here. 24 It's one of those issues where a lot of what 25 you said makes sense, but I would have to think 203 1 about, what -- what's the flip side of what you're 2 saying. 3 So, I don't think you're asking for a 4 question, but I definitely think it deserves a 5 greater conversation. 6 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: I just want to put it 7 out there. I think it's relevant to how data is 8 used, and how it's reported, when it's all settled, 9 or, at least for those percentages where there was 10 probable cause. 11 So it's something that I would love to 12 explore as a follow-up. 13 But, you've been incredibly -- 14 You have a question? 15 SENATOR BIAGGI: (Nods head.) 16 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: -- incredibly patient on 17 our end, and we really want to thank you for the 18 time and your testimony. 19 SENATOR BIAGGI: Just one comment. 20 Thank you, again. 21 I want to echo what my Assembly Co-Chair just 22 said. 23 Thank you for sitting and listening to us, 24 and answering all of our questions. It's incredibly 25 important. 204 1 I encourage you to stay, to hear from all of 2 the other individuals in this room who will be 3 testifying, not only because it's important for you 4 to have access to this information, but because, 5 again, we want to be partners in this journey with 6 you as well. 7 And, to anybody in the room who has a 8 complaint, we would encourage you to please speak to 9 these individuals in the room before the end of the 10 day. 11 Or, if anybody who's watching would like to 12 do that in the future, please, we encourage you to 13 use the resources that we have before us, which are 14 the State and the City. 15 Thank you very much. 16 D.C. DANA SUSSMAN: I'd just like to make a 17 quick note. 18 I'm going to be stepping back to my office 19 across the street to pump, and I will be returning 20 to hear the rest of the testimony. 21 So, just to -- I wanted to -- I will be back. 22 SENATOR BIAGGI: Thank you. 23 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Remember, 5:30 is the 24 deadline. 25 D.C. DANA SUSSMAN: Right. 205 1 SENATOR BIAGGI: Thank you. 2 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Thank you for your 3 testimony. 4 While the next presenter, who will be the 5 New York State Governor's Office of Employee 6 Relations, Michael Volforte, the director, comes up, 7 I want to make two quick announcements. 8 We have been joined by Assemblymember 9 Felix Ortiz and Assemblywoman Natalia Fernandez. 10 I want to thank them for joining us. 11 A reminder that, 5:30, security issues, you 12 will be able to exit at any point, but after 5:30 13 not return to the building. 14 And an acknowledgment of the fact that we 15 will be here for quite some time, and not all of you 16 have somebody available to go grab lunch for you. 17 I have ordered pizza for everyone. I think 18 there should be enough coming. It will be in 19 another room. We'll announce when it's available. 20 So... 21 [Applause.] 22 OFF-CAMERA SPEAKER: That's very nice. Thank 23 you. 24 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: As long as my counsel 25 tells me it's a legitimate campaign expense, so... 206 1 [Laughter.] 2 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Appreciate your 3 patience. 4 We're going to continue, so if we could 5 settle down. 6 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: I was ambitious with my 7 lead -- 8 OFF-CAMERA SPEAKER: You see what you did 9 with the pizza announcement? 10 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: -- where it said "Good 11 morning." 12 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Too excited. It will be 13 a while. 14 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: I was ambitious. 15 SENATOR BIAGGI: You can begin. 16 Thank you. 17 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: Thank you. 18 Good afternoon. 19 SENATOR BIAGGI: If we could just have quiet 20 and silence in the room. 21 Thank you. 22 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: Good afternoon, 23 Chair Skoufis, Chair Biaggi, Chair Salazar, 24 Chair Titus, Chair Crespo, and Chair Walker, and 25 other members of the Senate and Assembly here today. 207 1 My name is Michael Volforte, and I am the 2 director of the Governor's Office of Employee 3 Relations, also known as "GOER." 4 Thank you for the opportunity to participate 5 in this hearing on sexual harassment in the 6 workplace. 7 In these remarks I'd like to detail some of 8 the very important steps we've taken under 9 Governor Cuomo's leadership to tackle the issue of 10 discrimination in the workplace. 11 Shortly after the Governor was elected, we 12 created a compilation of all the rights and 13 protections that executive-branch state employees 14 have from employment-based discrimination called 15 "Equal Employment Opportunity in New York State: 16 Rights and Responsibilities," a handbook for 17 employees of the state of New York, also called 18 "The Handbook." 19 The Handbook informs state employees of their 20 rights and responsibilities when it comes to 21 protecting employees from discrimination. 22 In 2013 we implemented a standard 23 investigation process for agencies to follow in 24 investigation of complaints of protected-class 25 employment discrimination. 208 1 We also created a small unit within GOER to 2 assist agencies in completing those investigations 3 pursuant to that process, and to provide technical 4 guidance to both investigators and agency counsel 5 alike. 6 In 2013 we revised our 7 sexual-harassment-prevention training program, and 8 mandated that all executive-branch employees 9 complete that training on a yearly basis. 10 The next year we added two additional 11 mandated annual training courses on all 12 protected-class employment rights and reasonable 13 accommodation for both disability and religious 14 reasons. 15 In August of 2018 we took another step 16 forward in the investigation of complaints of 17 employment-related protected-class discrimination 18 with the Governor's issuance of Executive Order 187, 19 with the goals of achieving more independent 20 investigations of employment-discrimination 21 complaints, but ensuring that the investigative body 22 has knowledge and understanding of the state 23 workforce, employer-employee relationship. 24 Executive Order Number 187 transferred the 25 responsibility for conducting investigations of all 209 1 employment-related protected-class discrimination 2 complaints, in agencies and departments over which 3 the Governor has executive authority, to GOER. 4 These investigations include discrimination 5 complaints based upon protected-classes filed by 6 employees, including contractors, interns, and other 7 persons engaged in employment at these agencies and 8 departments. 9 The protected classes are those set forth in 10 the applicable federal, New York State, laws; 11 executive orders; and other policies; including 12 those based on age, arrest, conviction record, 13 color, creed, disability, domestic-violence victim 14 status, gender identity, marital and family status, 15 military status, national origin, predisposing 16 genetic characteristics, pregnancy-related 17 conditions, race, retaliation, sex, sexual 18 orientation, and sexual harassment. 19 Pursuant to Executive Order 187, effective 20 December 1, 2018, all complaints of protected-class 21 employment-related discrimination are being 22 investigated by GOER's anti-discrimination 23 investigations division (ADID). 24 This responsibility covers approximately 25 130,000 executive-branch employees, but does not 210 1 include employees of SUNY, CUNY, SED (the State 2 Education Department), the Legislature, office of 3 attorney general, or the office of state 4 comptroller. 5 GOER investigates complaints executive-branch 6 employees file internally within these -- within 7 state agencies, and external complaints, like those 8 filed with the division of human rights or the Equal 9 Employment Opportunity Commission. 10 Complainants may include employees, interns, 11 contractors, delivery people, consultants; anyone 12 whose workplace involves the state agency location 13 or interaction with state employees consistent with 14 state law and policy. 15 In preparation for its new responsibility, 16 GOER received 41 affirmative-action administrators 17 called "AAOs" from state agencies, who are already 18 investigating -- already engaged, excuse me, in the 19 investigation of employment-discrimination 20 complaints; and hired another six employees to help 21 manage these employees. 22 We also created an independent investigation 23 process, developed a new complaint form entitled 24 "New York State Employee Discrimination Complaint 25 Form," for employees to use, and revised 211 1 The Handbook, all the while making sure that our 2 training, policy, and procedures comport with the 3 2018 sexual-harassment prevention laws that were 4 enacted by the Legislature and signed into law by 5 the Governor. 6 Both the New York State Employee 7 Discrimination Complaint Form and The Handbook are 8 posted prominently on the GOER agency web page of 9 our -- homepage of our website, and agencies have 10 been instructed to regularly distribute them to 11 their employees as well. 12 Individuals now file complaints directly with 13 GOER without ever going through the chain of command 14 at their employing agency. 15 We've established an online fillable form 16 that can be e-mailed directly to a dedicated e-mail 17 box. Employees can also mail complaints to GOER. 18 We have AAOs located in a number of agencies, 19 and employees are also free to speak with them and 20 file complaints directly with them. 21 We also mandate that any supervisor or 22 manager who observes, witnesses, or hears about 23 discriminatory conduct, report the conduct by filing 24 a discrimination complaint with GOER. 25 Agencies send out reminders to their 212 1 employees regularly, to remind them to whom they can 2 complain, where the form and policy on 3 discrimination prevention is located. 4 GOER investigates complaints pursuant to our 5 established 10-step investigative process. 6 Agencies must cooperate with GOER, and 7 provide access to employee's information and 8 documentation relevant to each complaint. 9 When GOER receives a complaint, the 10 complainant receives an acknowledgment of receipt of 11 the complaint, and agency general counsel is also 12 notified of the complaint as well. 13 A respondent is notified at the point in the 14 investigation when it is necessary to inform them, 15 or when interim administrative action is being 16 taken. 17 The parties are notified of the outcome when 18 the investigation is concluded. 19 Once a complaint is concluded, if it is 20 substantiated, we work with the agency to ensure 21 that they are implementing corrective or 22 disciplinary action that we determine. 23 Confidentiality is important in our 24 investigations. Complainants, respondents, 25 witnesses, and administrators at agencies are 213 1 advised not to discuss complaints while the 2 investigation is ongoing, to prevent anyone from 3 trying to try to influence the outcome and to avoid 4 instances of retaliation. 5 Of course, complainants and respondents, 6 where represented, are free to speak with their 7 representatives. 8 We are clear about prohibiting retaliation. 9 Every employee, whether a witness, 10 complainant, or respondent, is advised during the 11 investigation process that retaliation is 12 prohibited. 13 Statistically, we have seen a rise in the 14 number of complaints overall. This is not 15 unexpected, and was anticipated, given a number of 16 factors, not the least of which, we think is, we are 17 providing regular reminders of where employees can 18 complain. And, additionally, employees now have 19 someone external to their own employing agency to 20 report discrimination to. 21 This is consistent with what we are hearing 22 anecdotally from other entities that handle 23 complaints of discrimination: increasing awareness 24 of what constitutes discrimination leads to more 25 people filing complaints. 214 1 Also, we determine whether the allegations in 2 each complaint, if substantiated, violate the policy 3 set forth in The Handbook; not whether they actually 4 violate the law. 5 GOER investigates every allegation of 6 discrimination, whether the complainant overheard a 7 single sexual comment or joke, to other than -- to 8 other far more involved and complex allegations of 9 discrimination. 10 We take our role in investigating and 11 resolving complaints of discrimination extremely 12 seriously. No employee should have to endure 13 harassment based on their protected-class status. 14 And we are committed to furthering efforts to 15 both ensure that the State's policies concerning 16 discrimination, harassment, and discrimination in 17 the workplace are followed, and holding individuals 18 accountable who violate our policies. 19 Thank you for the opportunity to appear, and 20 I'll answer any questions that you have. 21 SENATOR BIAGGI: Senator Salazar. 22 SENATOR SALAZAR: Thank you. 23 And thank you for testifying. 24 We missed GOER at the first hearing in 25 February, so I really appreciate you coming here 215 1 today. 2 I first wanted to ask about the complaint 3 form that was mentioned. 4 I've seen the complaint form online, and 5 I know it's two pages. It includes the division's 6 e-mail and mailing address, but there's no -- 7 there's no phone number on the form. 8 I also noticed that there is no disclaimer on 9 the form or any language that might inform an 10 employee of their rights. 11 And I'm just wondering, who exactly developed 12 the form, and -- or who was consulted by GOER in 13 creating it? 14 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: GOER developed the form 15 itself. 16 SENATOR SALAZAR: Right. Okay. 17 And could you perhaps tell me, like, who 18 within GOER, maybe not by name, but what the role is 19 (indiscernible cross-talking) -- 20 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: Sure. 21 Myself and my anti-discrimination 22 investigation's division leadership developed the 23 form. 24 SENATOR SALAZAR: Excellent. Thank you. 25 And there was one other question I wanted to 216 1 ask you. 2 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: On the information on 3 other rights and responsibilities, that's contained 4 in that handbook that I referenced, which is a 5 44-ish-page document, which is located on our 6 website. 7 And all the agencies post on their own 8 intranets where the location of that handbook is. 9 SENATOR SALAZAR: Excellent. Thank you. 10 Another question I had was with regard to, 11 ahead of -- of actually taking responsibility for 12 these complaints, GOER, it says, received 13 affirmative-action administrators from state 14 agencies. 15 I'm wondering what happened to any active 16 investigations from other agencies, after this -- 17 after the executive order went into effect, any 18 active investigations from other agencies, such as 19 DHR or JCOPE. 20 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: We don't handle DHR or 21 JCOPE investigations. 22 But if it was an internal complaint, the 23 investigation was finished by the individuals doing 24 that investigation, or one of our investigators. 25 And if it was an external complaint, meaning, 217 1 somebody filed with DHR, but before there was an 2 employer response, those same individuals would have 3 completed that. 4 We would have no role with JCOPE. 5 SENATOR SALAZAR: I see. 6 So -- so then GOER has not received any, 7 like, active investigations that were transferred 8 over from, or referred by, either by one of these 9 agencies or an agency that was just not equipped and 10 not responsible for handling complaints? 11 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: We -- if an -- if an 12 indiv -- if an agency didn't have an AAO, we will 13 assign an AAO to investigate anything from that 14 agency. 15 That was the general process before, except, 16 they might get somebody from a different agency. 17 This time, as of now, they'll get somebody 18 from GOER to do that. 19 And we took steps, and are taking steps, to 20 make sure all of those open issues were closed after 21 the transfer of the 41 individuals to GOER. 22 SENATOR SALAZAR: Thank you. 23 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: So, uhm, just want to be 24 clear. 25 So, state agencies will no longer have their 218 1 own internal process? 2 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: Every state agency has an 3 internal process, and it's the same: it's the one 4 that GOER has dictated is the process. 5 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: So you've given them a 6 process, they all have to follow it. 7 But if a -- if I work for an agency, I cannot 8 go to my agency to file; I have to go to your office 9 to file? 10 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: You can still go to your 11 agency to file. 12 So that's not an option, except that that 13 agency is mandated to report it to GOER, and GOER 14 will investigate it, so that the agency isn't 15 investigating themselves. 16 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: So they can only serve 17 as a recipient of the complaint? 18 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: Correct. 19 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: You handle it -- 20 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: They -- 21 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: -- you enforce it, you 22 investigate it? 23 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: Sorry, I won't interrupt. 24 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: No, no, just -- 25 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: Yes, you're absolutely 219 1 right, they are the recipient of it. 2 They either try to have the individual fill 3 out a complaint form, or they're instructed to fill 4 out the complaint form themselves with the 5 information they have, and forward it to GOER. 6 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: So that -- that an 7 employee would not have a recourse to go to the 8 agencies we just heard from, human rights 9 commission? 10 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: That's different. 11 What my role as -- is, is the employer is 12 investigating ourselves -- 13 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Okay. 14 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: -- so to speak, and they 15 are external agencies. Think of them as law 16 enforcement, just like the courts. 17 Our process does not restrict an employee 18 from -- an employee could go to somebody in their 19 own agency. That gets filed to GOER; an AAO there 20 within GOER. 21 They could come to GOER themselves by 22 e-mailing it, to the -- mailing or -- or e-mailing. 23 They could file a separate complaint with DHR 24 or the EEOC, and follow their procedures. 25 Or, they could go to court in accordance with 220 1 whatever rules are applied. 2 Those are all options, and those are things 3 that are highlighted also in our handbook. 4 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: So DHR and GOER could, 5 essentially, be making the same investigation 6 simultaneously? 7 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: If the person, yes, goes 8 to both of us at the same time, it -- it -- for all 9 intents and purposes, it will be the same 10 investigation, except that, in the internal 11 complaint, we will be -- we will be reporting, so to 12 speak, to ourselves, and we'll issue a report to the 13 agency, telling them we found "X" happened, and this 14 is how you fix it. 15 In the DHR context, what will happen is, is 16 the agency will use whatever information we put 17 together as an investigation to file their response 18 with DHR. 19 We are not conversing with DHR regarding 20 investigations. We're just investigating on behalf 21 of the agency, to give them the facts, to answer 22 that. And those facts will either be discrimination 23 occurred or discrimination didn't occur, and then 24 they'll -- then the agency themselves will follow 25 the DHR process. 221 1 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Thank you. 2 Assemblywoman Simotas. 3 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMOTAS: Thank you for joining 4 us today. 5 How does your office track numbers and 6 outcomes of reports of every state agency, and will 7 any of that information become public? 8 SENATOR CARLUCCI: We -- we keep track of it 9 internally now that we're -- we've taken over this 10 investigative process. And, we've built a system to 11 track that, and give data to us, so that it informs 12 future decisions we make, in terms of training and 13 efforts we have make to root out, you know, systemic 14 problems that exist maybe in an agency, in an 15 office, and things like that. 16 So we have that information. 17 We have no current mandate to publish that 18 data, but it's some -- you know, we certainly always 19 review that and plan on reviewing it in the future. 20 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMOTAS: Would it something 21 that's FOILable? 22 Is that -- obviously, the random public 23 couldn't get it. 24 But can we as legislators get it if we asked 25 for it? 222 1 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: Uhm... 2 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMOTAS: Well, how about 3 this -- 4 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: I can't answer the 5 question totally on FOIL, 'cause it's -- there will 6 be things. 7 Statistical information could be available. 8 Specifics won't be. 9 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMOTAS: Well, then, I make 10 the request right now for the Legislature, I can 11 speak on behalf of the Assembly, that we would like 12 that information. 13 Hopefully, we'll figure out a way to make it 14 public, because I think that society -- the public 15 should know about how many complaints are filed 16 regarding state agencies. 17 But, nonetheless, I would make that request 18 right now. 19 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: Okay. 20 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMOTAS: My next question is: 21 What efforts has your office made to implement best 22 practices for trauma-informed investigations? 23 We heard at our last hearing, a lot of people 24 who've been through the process, who weren't 25 satisfied with being kept up to date, with some of 223 1 the questions that were inappropriate. 2 Clearly, these investigations are asking 3 sensitive questions. 4 And it would behoove your office to make sure 5 that people who are trauma -- who are experts in 6 this trauma are doing the investigations. 7 So what steps have -- has your office taken 8 to do so? 9 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: All of the investigators 10 either have a background in this field. 11 And if they -- if they don't, they're all 12 trained by my office now so the training is 13 consistent. 14 The term, the "trauma-based" -- 15 "trauma-informed training," we don't, technically, 16 do that exact training. But we do train our 17 investigators in how to be, you know, sensitively 18 asking questions to be inquisitive. 19 Everyone realizes it's very sensitive, both 20 in the sexual-harassment field and in other fields. 21 You know, I did view the last testimony. 22 I'm not sure that people who spoke about the 23 process were speaking about our process, so I can't 24 really comment on the questions about what specific 25 questions were and were not asked. 224 1 I know I heard some earlier testimony on what 2 JCOPE asked, but that's not what we do. 3 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMOTAS: I know, specifically, 4 a lot of the people who testified talked about being 5 kept up to date, being informed, of the whole 6 process of the determinations. 7 What is your process in your 10 steps that 8 you follow to make sure that complainants are kept 9 up to date? 10 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: Sure. 11 They're informed at the beginning, they're 12 consulted during it. They're often interviewed, and 13 sometimes multiple times. And then they're informed 14 at the end whether their complaint is substantiated 15 or unsubstantiated. And if it's substantiated, that 16 we're taking action. 17 There is not a regular updating process as 18 part of that, other than what I've described. 19 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMOTAS: Thank you. 20 SENATOR BIAGGI: Senator Mayer. 21 SENATOR MAYER: Thank you. 22 Thank you for being here. 23 Question on your testimony, on page 3, and 24 this is a question I just don't know the answer, 25 but, you say, "We mandate that any supervisor or 225 1 manager who observes, witnesses, or hears about 2 discriminatory conduct report the conduct by filing 3 a discrimination complaint with GOER." 4 Now, is the -- so mandatory reporting, which 5 I think is extremely critical, is that required by 6 Executive Order 187, or is that a GOER imposition? 7 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: It's -- it's required in 8 our policy, and it's required by GOER. 9 I'd have to -- I didn't -- I don't have the 10 executive order with me, but it may -- it may 11 reference that in the executive order. 12 But it is in our policy, and it is in GOER 13 pronouncements to the agencies. 14 SENATOR MAYER: And so with respect to every 15 executive agency, and I recognize GOER doesn't go 16 beyond that, there is a mandatory reporting 17 requirement of -- by a supervisor or manager of any 18 discriminatory conduct of which they are made aware? 19 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: Yes. 20 SENATOR MAYER: And when you are made aware 21 of conduct which is, arguably, or potentially, 22 criminal, do you -- what steps do you take with 23 respect to that conduct? 24 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: We refer it to law 25 enforcement, and then we wait for an a law 226 1 enforcement determination to go ahead with an 2 administrative investigation, so as to not disturb 3 the criminal investigation. 4 SENATOR MAYER: And how many times has GOER 5 done that in the last year? 6 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: I don't have -- I don't 7 have a statistic off the top of my head. 8 SENATOR MAYER: Any -- anytime? 9 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: At least one, that I'm 10 aware of. 11 SENATOR MAYER: And not withstanding the fact 12 that this is executive agencies, again, do you ever 13 refer -- let me rephrase that. 14 In the case of a pattern or practice of 15 discrimination alleged against a supervisor or 16 manager of a state agency, what steps do you take 17 that are distinguishable from an individual 18 complaint against a supervisor or manager? 19 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: If an investigation, or 20 investigations, led to a conclusion that an 21 individual supervisor or manager had a pattern or 22 practice, that individual would be brought up on 23 administrative action. And depending on their -- 24 their job, they could be -- they might be in a unit 25 where we have to file notice of disciplinary 227 1 charges. Or, if they're a high-ranking individual, 2 if the conduct is of a level, they'll be 3 disciplined/terminated. 4 SENATOR MAYER: Since this policy, I think 5 it's 2018 the Governor's executive order went into 6 effect, do you know how many employees of state 7 agencies have been terminated as a result of their 8 discriminatory conduct? 9 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: No. 10 SENATOR MAYER: Do you have any -- any idea 11 that -- could we be provided with that number? 12 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: I can see if we have that 13 number. 14 I don't know that GOER has that number, 15 'cause the agencies themselves handle disciplines. 16 So it's not -- it's not a -- we don't have 17 prosecutors that prosecute notices of discipline for 18 the agency. 19 SENATOR MAYER: I understand. 20 But you do the investigation. 21 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: We do the investigation. 22 SENATOR MAYER: Do you make a recommendation 23 with respect to what action should follow? 24 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: Yes. 25 SENATOR MAYER: So are there cases in which 228 1 you have recommended termination? 2 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: Yes. 3 SENATOR MAYER: How many? 4 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: I don't have that 5 information. 6 SENATOR MAYER: Could you provide it? 7 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: Certainly. 8 SENATOR MAYER: Thank you. 9 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Assemblywoman Fernandez. 10 ASSEMBLYWOMAN FERNANDEZ: Good afternoon. 11 Following up with, I guess, a topic that 12 Chair Crespo brought, and what we've talked about of 13 you handling your investigation and the agency doing 14 their own investigation, what happens if you come to 15 a decision that is different than what the agency 16 decides? 17 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: The agency is not 18 investigating. 19 ASSEMBLYWOMAN FERNANDEZ: They don't? 20 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: So -- 21 ASSEMBLYWOMAN FERNANDEZ: Okay, I thought 22 I heard (indiscernible cross-talking) -- 23 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: -- but -- so just in case 24 I was unclear: 25 We get the complaint. We investigate the 229 1 complaint. We render a factual determination as to 2 what we think occurred. 3 The agency can say to us, Well, we think you 4 should investigate, this. 5 Maybe there's something particular to that 6 agency that we didn't look at in terms of that. 7 There's a final determination as to what 8 facts occurred. 9 GOER determines what those facts are. 10 The agency does not get an opportunity to 11 have a vote or overrule GOER. 12 ASSEMBLYWOMAN FERNANDEZ: Okay. 13 And Senator Mayer kind of took my question 14 with determinations, and how often those happen. 15 But, would you say that that's a successful 16 assessment to a case of sexual harassment if the 17 person gets terminated? 18 Or, has there been instances where they don't 19 get terminated, but they just go through, I guess, 20 more training or policy amendments? 21 Can you give me an example of, I guess, 22 results from a complaint that does not end in 23 termination, but what do you do -- 24 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: Oh, sure. 25 ASSEMBLYWOMAN FERNANDEZ: -- with the 230 1 complainer and the victim? 2 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: Since the overwhelming 3 majority of our workforce are unionized, they all -- 4 the -- that vast majority have tenure rights and 5 due-process rights. 6 So you have to bring -- in order to take the 7 ultimate action, termination, for those employees, 8 you have to file written charges. They have to be 9 fairly specific. And then you have to prove them in 10 front of an independent arbitrator, and then that 11 arbitrator is to award termination. 12 Those are -- you know, in serious cases, 13 those are things that we go for. 14 So if there was an -- if there was an 15 incident where a -- you know, a man grabs a woman, 16 we're gonna -- and that's proven, factually, to have 17 occurred, we're going to file charges and we're 18 going to seek termination. 19 There are levels below that, 20 administratively, we can go through. 21 If someone is a -- and it's not to 22 characterize the content as -- or, the action as 23 good or bad, but, if an individual makes one 24 sexually-explicit joke, that typically won't amount 25 to a violation of law. We would still investigate 231 1 that, make a conclusion. And if it occurred, we 2 would take action. 3 Sometimes that would be, the individual is 4 counseled, which base -- they receive a memo, that 5 goes in their file, that alerts them that it was 6 improper, that they shouldn't do that. And they are 7 retrained on that. 8 So that would be -- that would be the type of 9 thing that wouldn't go to a disciplinary process, on 10 those limited facts. 11 If that individual has some other history, 12 that all gets taken into account and could change 13 that -- that -- the compass on where we go. 14 But if you're talking about an employee with 15 28 years of service, and had never done anything 16 incorrect or bad in their career, and made that one 17 poor choice to tell that one joke, that might be the 18 result in that case if it was founded. 19 ASSEMBLYWOMAN FERNANDEZ: Say, if this person 20 continues -- they get the first warning, go through 21 training, counseling, they do it again -- do you 22 have like a "three strikes, you're out" type of 23 motto? Or, is there some type of limit or statute 24 that you use to take a stronger -- 25 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: We try to be consistent 232 1 across lines. 2 It's all going to be dependent on what their 3 history was, and what they did this time. 4 So if somebody did that comment, and then the 5 next day they're doing another comment, or, you 6 know, maybe they -- then, that's going to -- that 7 timing, in our mind, would ratchet up how we take 8 action on that individual. 9 If there's a long period of time, if we're 10 talking years, that's going to be a factor. 11 The years an employee has, the type of 12 conduct, all of that goes in. 13 So there's no stead answer, and there's no 14 specific chart of, you do X, and you do Y. 15 We do certain things we take extremely 16 seriously, and go to the end, such as complaints of 17 retaliation. 18 If you think you've retaliated against 19 somebody, we will seek your termination. 20 ASSEMBLYWOMAN FERNANDEZ: I've seen how 21 certain people working in a certain agency might 22 move to another agency in the time of their -- you 23 know, (indiscernible) working for the State. 24 If they do have a record of these type of 25 reports and complaints, is the next employer or 233 1 supervisor made aware of them before hiring and 2 accepting them? 3 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: I don't know what occurred 4 in the past. 5 Certainly, those, that information is now 6 centralized in my office, and it's certainly 7 something we can look at in terms of how that -- 8 that's handled. 9 Certainly, that information, now that it's 10 within GOER, becomes relevant if there's another 11 complaint that's in our purview, and so that we'll 12 have that individual's history (inaudible) those 13 make those informed decisions about how to handle 14 that next case, so to speak. 15 ASSEMBLYWOMAN FERNANDEZ: Thank you. 16 SENATOR BIAGGI: Thank you. 17 I have several questions, and I want to just 18 start at the top. 19 So, I think that -- I'm a little bit 20 confused, and I read a lot of the documents before 21 to prepare for this. So, if you could just bear 22 with me and humor me, that would be much 23 appreciated. 24 So how many agencies are currently under 25 GOER's purview? 234 1 Or, perhaps, maybe it would be easier this 2 way: How many agencies or entities are not under 3 GOER's purview? 4 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: I've listed them in my 5 testimony, and most authorities are not. 6 SENATOR BIAGGI: So from -- at least from 7 what I have found, is it accurate to say that the 8 MTA and the judiciary are not under GOER's purview? 9 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: Correct. 10 SENATOR BIAGGI: Okay. So if a member of the 11 judiciary, or, a staffer in the judiciary, had a 12 problem or an issue, would they just go to DHR? 13 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: They could -- I -- at 14 this -- based on last year's legislation, if they 15 hadn't done it before -- 16 SENATOR BIAGGI: Sure. 17 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: -- the judiciary should 18 have their own policy where somebody could make an 19 internal complaint. 20 They could go to DHR. 21 SENATOR BIAGGI: Got it, got it. 22 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: They could go 23 (indiscernible cross-talking) -- 24 SENATOR BIAGGI: And the same for MTA; 25 correct? 235 1 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: Correct. 2 SENATOR BIAGGI: Okay. 3 So who oversees the MTA and the judiciary? 4 Who's going to be doing that oversight? 5 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: I don't know the answer to 6 that question. 7 SENATOR BIAGGI: So there's currently no 8 entity in the state government overseeing any of the 9 complaints and investigations for the MTA and the 10 judiciary; is that correct? 11 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: I know that GOER is not 12 overseeing it. I don't know if anybody else is. 13 SENATOR BIAGGI: Okay. 14 How many employees currently are under your 15 purview? 16 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: In terms of, that are 17 covered by -- that we might investigate complaints 18 of? Or (indiscernible cross-talking) -- 19 SENATOR BIAGGI: No, how many individuals are 20 within GOER to be going through the investigations 21 and the complaints? 22 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: There are 23 41 investigators. 24 SENATOR BIAGGI: I saw that, yes. 25 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: And there are a staff of 236 1 nine individuals that are above those investigators, 2 performing oversight, administrative functions. 3 SENATOR BIAGGI: So about 50, and then you, 4 is 51. 5 So 51 individuals overseeing almost every 6 state agency in the state of New York, and all of 7 the investigations and complaints that come through; 8 is that correct? 9 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: Correct. 10 SENATOR BIAGGI: Okay. 11 What sexual-harassment policy do you have in 12 place for the executive-branch staff? 13 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: The executive-branch 14 staff, it's in our EEO handbook. 15 SENATOR BIAGGI: Okay. Does it go further 16 than the model policy or what's in The Handbook? 17 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: It's consistent with the 18 model policy, but I'm not certain it goes further, 19 other than, we would -- a complaint of that single 20 joke that I stated before, would not, generally, be 21 a violation with DHR. But we could find it to be a 22 violation of policy and take action based on it. 23 SENATOR BIAGGI: Okay. 24 On -- so on December 1, 2018, that was when 25 the inspector general's office switched its cases 237 1 from the inspector general's office to GOER? 2 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: No. 3 SENATOR BIAGGI: So can you tell me what the 4 date is? 5 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: On December 1, all of the 6 investigators transferred from their agencies to 7 GOER, a physical -- a physical paper move that made 8 them GOER employees. 9 SENATOR BIAGGI: So what was the role, then, 10 of the inspector general's office at that time? 11 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: The inspector general's 12 office operates pursuant to its operating statute, 13 and investigates those things that fall within its 14 purview under, I think it's Executive Order -- 15 excuse me, Executive Law 55. 16 They were not handling administrative 17 complaints of -- administrative investigations of 18 discrimination complaints. That was being done by 19 the agencies themselves. 20 SENATOR BIAGGI: Okay. 21 So you mentioned the 41 affirmative-action 22 administrators. 23 What is the role of the EEOs with relation to 24 those affirmative-action administrators? 25 Because my understanding was that the EEOs 238 1 reported each complaint to GOER. So those were the 2 individuals within each agency, right, that would 3 receive a complaint. And then that complaint would 4 go from the EEO officer to, then, GOER. 5 So, what is the communication structure 6 between the EEOs and the affirmative-action 7 administrators, if any? 8 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: For the most part, those 9 individuals were the same. 10 SENATOR BIAGGI: They were the same? 11 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: They were the same. 12 They're -- the term "EEO officer" and "AAO" 13 were largely used interchangeably. There weren't 14 distinct groups of that. 15 What happened with the -- so -- so what 16 happened with the transfer of function was, those 17 41 AAOs became GOER employees. And, if they had 18 existing complaints, brought the complaints with 19 them. 20 SENATOR BIAGGI: Okay. 21 So -- I mean, since the first 22 sexual-harassment hearing, I'm sure you can probably 23 make an inference that many individuals have reached 24 out to my office about different issues that they've 25 faced as it relates to their complaints with DHR, 239 1 and whether we can help, and what we can do; and in 2 particular, FOIL requests. 3 And so you had said that GOER does not 4 investigate DHR. 5 So why is it, then, that GOER had sent 6 complaints to -- to -- or, DHR had sent 7 complaints -- their complaints to GOER for this 8 response to a FOIL request that was made? 9 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: I -- I think we're mixing 10 metaphors. 11 SENATOR BIAGGI: Metaphors? 12 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: So, GOER doesn't 13 investigate cases that are filed with DHR in terms 14 of DHR's statutory responsibilities. 15 SENATOR BIAGGI: But what if the -- what if 16 the individual had worked for the agency? 17 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: That complaint would get 18 referred to GOER and we would investigate that. 19 So if -- if it was a state employee 20 complaining -- choosing to use the internal process, 21 and saying, My supervisor within DHR did X and Y, 22 GOER would investigate that employee's complaint, 23 and investigate the supervisor, and render a 24 determination that DHR would implement as an 25 employer. 240 1 If that employee said, I don't want to go 2 through GOER. I want to -- and I don't want to file 3 with DHR, or, I want to file with DHR, they're 4 filing with DHR in that capacity, with their -- 5 DHR's statutory responsibility to investigate 6 complaints of discrimination, in general, or, the 7 EEOC. 8 We wouldn't investigate in that second 9 circumstance contemporaneously with DHR. That would 10 be them in their capacity, and maybe they have some 11 process set up as to how they handle that. 12 But that would not be us. 13 So that's why, what you're looking at may be 14 that there's a DHR complaint. That would be a -- 15 what we call an "internal complaint," which is 16 internal to the State, the employer investigating 17 its own actions, which now GOER is doing. 18 SENATOR BIAGGI: So -- I mean, please excuse 19 me, but I feel like you are speaking in tongues. 20 I really do not understand. 21 So can you just lay it out for me in a way 22 that is like very simple, as if I had never read 23 anything before, had no idea, and I am you, right 24 and your relationship to DHR is...? 25 Go. 241 1 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: If you as an employee 2 of -- well, I'll go back to the example you gave. 3 I'm an employee of DHR. I feel -- 4 SENATOR BIAGGI: For an employee of an 5 agency, let's just say. An employee of an agency. 6 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: Take another -- take 7 another -- whatever example you want, I'll run 8 through. 9 So another agency that's covered under our 10 purview, depending on that agen -- on what agency 11 that employee works for, you have a number of 12 options. 13 One: You can file a complaint, which we call 14 an "internal complaint," which is a complaint not 15 filed pursuant to law or statute, which is what we 16 consider DHR's process, EEOC process, or court. 17 So those processes are not what we 18 characterize as internal. 19 So you, as an employee in an agency, can file 20 directly with GOER. You can mail it to us. You can 21 e-mail it to us. 22 Depending on what agency you're located in, 23 GOER may have an investigator on-site. You can go 24 to that investigator, give them your form, or they 25 will help you fill out that form, so you can 242 1 investigate that. 2 And then that GOER investigator will file 3 that form with GOER, and then that gets 4 investigated. 5 You also have the ability, if you so choose, 6 you can go to your supervisor, and your manager, 7 your general counsel, of your agency; you could file 8 that complaint with them. They're obligated to send 9 that to GOER. 10 Or, if you don't want to do any of those 11 things, you could go to the division of human rights 12 and they'll assign somebody, pursuant to their 13 processes, to look at what the employer does, go 14 through that probable-cause determination that was 15 talked about in the previous testimony, make that 16 determination, and go through their procedures. 17 Or, you can go to the EEOC. 18 Or, you can file with court. 19 SENATOR BIAGGI: Okay. 20 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: Those would be all the 21 potential options. 22 SENATOR BIAGGI: Got it. 23 All right, that's very helpful. Thank you. 24 So -- so, now, going back to the -- where we 25 started: Does GOER track the investigations and 243 1 complaints that DHR oversees? 2 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: Only if it's in that 3 first, what I'll call, "bucket" I spoke to, before 4 you get to a technical legal filing with DHR or with 5 the EEOC. 6 So if it is -- if it's a DHR employee, and 7 they want to file with their supervisor in the 8 internal complaint process; if they want to file 9 with an on-site AAO, if there is one; if they want 10 to mail it to GOER; if they want to mail it to -- 11 or, e-mail it to GOER; all of those would be 12 tracked. 13 If DHR is getting a complaint on their form, 14 pursuant to their procedures and the law, from an 15 employee of any state agency, we don't track DHR in 16 that. 17 SENATOR BIAGGI: Okay. 18 Can you just hold on for one moment? 19 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: While we're on a break, 20 I'll just mention the pizza did arrive. 21 Courage, everyone, not to go at once. 22 It's a room back in this corner direction 23 (indicating). 24 But... 25 (Inaudible comments being made.) 244 1 [Laughter.] 2 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Only in Puerto Rico. 3 [Laughter.] 4 SENATOR BIAGGI: Okay. I will -- I'm going 5 to hand it over to Yuh-Line, to -- or, excuse me, 6 Line -- Assemblywoman Niou -- 7 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: We're roomies, that's 8 okay. 9 SENATOR BIAGGI: -- to ask the question. 10 I think that I -- I think I get it; I just 11 want to make sure that I get it. 12 And if I don't, I know where to find you. 13 So, thank you. 14 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: Hi. 15 So I just -- just a couple of brief 16 questions. I know that you're running out of time. 17 So what did you mean -- when responding to 18 Assemblymember Simotas's question on trauma-informed 19 training, what did you mean when you said 20 "a background in this field"? 21 I just wanted to kind of get a feel. 22 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: A number of the people 23 that we transferred had numerous years investigating 24 complaints of discrimination, either with the State 25 or came from other areas where they had those 245 1 backgrounds. 2 So -- 3 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: There's like no 4 certification? 5 Is there anything that you -- 6 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: Some of them -- I mean, 7 we've had people from work -- who worked with the 8 EEOC, who've worked in private industry, who've 9 worked with the division of human rights, and had 10 whatever training there was there. 11 So that's what I meant on the background 12 (indiscernible cross-talking) -- 13 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: Oh, okay. So it's not 14 standardized? 15 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: It's not -- where we get 16 folks from is not the training we give them is. But 17 it -- I just want to make it -- it does not include, 18 technically, what everyone is referring to in terms 19 of that "trauma-informed training." 20 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: Okay. 21 How long does an investigation usually take? 22 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: There is no "usual." 23 We -- it -- it -- we have -- because of 24 the -- what's involved, it really depends on 25 complaints, and how -- what -- the number of 246 1 complainants, the number of respondents, the 2 complexity. 3 If it's a -- if it's an issue that perhaps 4 involves something that was a criminal matter, that 5 got referred back to us, that might jump the line. 6 So all those things work into it. 7 Eventually, we'd like to work towards a goal 8 of 30 days. 9 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: 30 days, okay, goal of 10 30 days? 11 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: Goal of 30 days. 12 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: Okay. 13 And what's the procedure for investigation? 14 Do you start with the complainant? 15 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: Yes, the complainant gets 16 an acknowledgment of their -- so they send us the 17 form, and we send them a note back that we received 18 their form, with notice that they should not receive 19 retaliation. 20 The investigator, I'm going to truncate, 21 makes a game plan to investigate. The matter gets 22 investigated. 23 We are in consultation with the agency's 24 general counsel because, since we're investigating 25 other agencies, we need documents that are in their 247 1 possession, e-mails. 2 So that takes part of the process. 3 There is interviewing of individuals 4 involved. 5 We then wind up with a report, and a 6 recommendation as to how to bring the matter to a 7 conclusion at the end. 8 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: And you're hoping to do 9 all of that in 30 days? 10 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: At least complete the 11 initial investigative report and -- or, 12 investigation, and start the report write-in. 13 When it comes to things that are going to the 14 EEOC or DHR, because of the statutory time frames, 15 we have to ramp those investigations up, and those 16 also sometimes move in front of other investigations 17 because of time limits that those agencies impose on 18 the State to get back to them. 19 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: And since it might take 20 a lot longer, do you provide investigations, like 21 status updates or, anything, to those that you've 22 interviewed, the complainant's -- with the witness 23 or the complainant? 24 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: Formally, it's the 25 beginning and the end. 248 1 And, informally, if the individual calls, we 2 tell them (indiscernible cross-talking) -- 3 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: So they have to 4 instigate? 5 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: Yes, there's no 6 (indiscernible cross-talking) -- 7 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: They have to call you? 8 You don't update them regularly if there's 9 any movement on their cases? 10 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: No. 11 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: Okay. 12 Uhm -- okay. 13 So -- I mean, I -- I'm just saying all this 14 because, we read recently, the "Times Union," 15 Gina Bianchi's case, GOER had claimed that the 16 investigation of the case is ongoing for more than a 17 year later. 18 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: As I discussed with 19 individuals, we're not commenting on any ongoing 20 investigations -- on any litigation. 21 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: I know. 22 I'm talking about the length. 23 And that's -- is that normal? Is that -- 24 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: I'm not going to comment 25 on anything in litigation. 249 1 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: Okay. 2 All right, thank you. 3 SENATOR BIAGGI: One final question for me. 4 Okay, so, you stated that GOER does not track 5 DHR complaints. Correct? 6 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: I said GOER doesn't track 7 what DHR is investigating, generally. 8 That's what I -- that's what my intent was, 9 that we're not tracking what they are doing, 10 generally. 11 If it relates -- 12 SENATOR BIAGGI: What does that mean, 13 "not doing, generally"? 14 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: If it relates to a State 15 agency; so, in those examples, when an employee 16 would go to DHR, in their statutory capacity, and 17 file a complaint with them, we would have that 18 information because the agency would report that 19 they had an employee go to DHR. 20 We would investigate that, and provide 21 information to the agency. 22 So we have information of when State 23 employees file stat -- what I'll call a "statutory 24 complaint." 25 SENATOR BIAGGI: What is a stat -- so, what 250 1 is a "statutory complaint"? 2 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: DHR and the EEOC exists 3 pursuant to law, to investigate complaints -- 4 SENATOR BIAGGI: Okay. 5 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: -- that come to them. 6 SENATOR BIAGGI: So a complaint that's under 7 their purview? 8 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: It's under their purview. 9 SENATOR BIAGGI: So just a complaint? 10 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: It's a complaint -- 11 SENATOR BIAGGI: So can we simplify when 12 we're speaking, so that I can stay with you on this 13 page. 14 So GOER -- you had said GOER does not track 15 DHR complaints? 16 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: I -- I -- we don't track 17 complaint -- we don't track all complaints to DHR. 18 If a State employee makes a complaint to DHR, 19 we have that information. 20 SENATOR BIAGGI: Okay, thank you. 21 So I have a response to a FOIL Request, that 22 proves that, from 2015 to the present, GOER has been 23 tracking DHR complaints. 24 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: As I just stated, we have 25 information on -- 251 1 SENATOR BIAGGI: But you -- but you -- see -- 2 but do you understand why this is confusing to me? 3 Because you first stated that you're not 4 tracking it. And now you're stating that you do 5 track it. 6 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: I think your question was, 7 or at least I interpret it to be, from a general 8 perspective. 9 SENATOR BIAGGI: A general per -- I don't 10 understand what that even means. 11 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: DHR -- 12 SENATOR BIAGGI: GOER -- wait, let me finish. 13 Complaints that DHR had, that are made to 14 DHR, does GOER track those complaints? 15 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: Only if it's made by a 16 State employee. 17 SENATOR BIAGGI: Only if it's made by a State 18 employee? 19 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: Yes. 20 SENATOR BIAGGI: So that was not clarified 21 earlier. 22 So I would just recommend that you be precise 23 with your words, because that is -- that could 24 potentially lead to something very confusing, and 25 not helpful to the inquiry that we're trying to make 252 1 here. 2 So, thank you. 3 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: I know your time is 4 precious. 5 Senator Liu and Assemblyman Buckwald to 6 close. 7 OFF-CAMERA SPEAKER: (Inaudible.) 8 SENATOR LIU: No, that's okay. 9 Thank you very much, Mr. Chair. 10 I want to go with what our Chairwoman has 11 talked about. 12 The testimony is really not that clear. 13 I know you're trying. 14 It just sounds like a lot of legalese. 15 Generally. Sometimes. Sometimes not. 16 I mean, are you crossing your fingers too? 17 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: (Holds up open hands.) 18 SENATOR LIU: Okay. And no toes? 19 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: No toes. 20 SENATOR LIU: All right, good. 21 Let me ask the question that I asked the DHR 22 also, which is, that, you know, I understand you're 23 running us through your procedures, what you've 24 done, what you haven't been doing. 25 But what about what more you could do? 253 1 What about complaints that, for example, are 2 probably legitimate complaints, but just don't meet 3 the current legal standard: that's "severe and 4 pervasive." 5 I mean, how does GOERS (sic) deal with that? 6 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: As I stated earlier, we -- 7 we take our investigations at a policy level. 8 And to kind of go back a little bit, 9 complaints before DHR can be for any public or 10 private employer in New York State. 11 I over -- our process deals with a segment of 12 only 130,000. 13 So when I talked earlier, what I meant to 14 communicate was, those 130,000, if those people file 15 complaints, I, certainly, we, have that information. 16 For a town, an authority, we probably, 17 generally, don't have that information. 18 A private entity, we definitely don't have 19 that information. 20 So, there is -- there -- you know, that's -- 21 in terms of that, that is legalese, but, again, 22 that's from our process. 23 But in terms of what an individual might 24 experience in terms of discrimination, what I'm 25 doing is -- in our agency, is, we -- we're 254 1 investigating as the employer, and we're looking at 2 whether conduct occurred, regardless of whether it 3 was the con -- what the conduct was, and not 4 focusing so much on that "severe and pervasive" 5 standard. 6 So, for example, if an individual comes to us 7 and complains, and says, "Somebody told me a 8 sexually-explicit joke, and I'm offended," they file 9 a complaint, we'll investigate that. 10 If it's found to have occurred, we will make 11 a finding that it occurred, and we will remedy it 12 administratively, as the employer, and take 13 appropriate action. 14 SENATOR LIU: So does that -- does that imply 15 that the policy, that these 130,000 employ -- State 16 employees are subject to, could be more rigorous or 17 comprehensive than the law currently is? 18 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: Yes. 19 SENATOR LIU: Would that be -- would it be 20 too onerous a standard to apply to private employers 21 in this state? 22 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: I mean, I know you heard 23 the earlier responses. 24 I have a similar response in terms of 25 commenting on existing legislation. 255 1 But what -- 2 SENATOR LIU: No, I'm not asking you to 3 comment on existing legislation. 4 I'm just comment -- asking you to comment on 5 your policy, and whether it is feasible to extend it 6 to all employers in this state. 7 Forget about bills. 8 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: And I can't speak for all 9 the employers. (Indiscernible cross-talking) -- 10 SENATOR LIU: I'm not asking you to speak for 11 all your employers. 12 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: (Indiscernible 13 cross-talking) -- 14 SENATOR LIU: Just as somebody who is expert 15 in this field, who is an expert in administering it, 16 I mean, just from your own knowledge. 17 Forget the legalese. 18 Look, your fingers are all clear (holding up 19 open hand). 20 Okay? 21 Just from your conscience, what do you think? 22 Is it unreasonable to expect a private 23 employer to uphold these same kinds of standards 24 that we expect our State employees -- the vast 25 majority of our State employees to uphold? 256 1 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: I really can't comment on 2 whether it's reasonable or unreasonable for a 3 private employer to adopt what the State has 4 adopted. 5 SENATOR LIU: Okay. 6 All right, thank you. 7 Thank you, Madam Chair. 8 SENATOR BIAGGI: Assemblymember Buckwald. 9 ASSEMBLYMAN BUCHWALD: Thank you. 10 My question, I believe, will be very quick, 11 and I preface it by only saying, it's a question out 12 of curiosity, not based on any specific incident or 13 otherwise. 14 Just curious, an employee of GOER, if there 15 were to be any harassment, sexual harassment or 16 otherwise, within the GOER workplace, where do they 17 go for -- other -- obviously, they have the same 18 abilities that anyone, even outside New York State 19 does, of going to DHR and so forth. 20 But is there any -- just like GOER serves as 21 an independent function within, for other state 22 agencies, is there some arrangement that's made for 23 GOER employees to have someone outside of GOER 24 provide that same sort of function? 25 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: What we would consider an 257 1 internal complaint -- 2 ASSEMBLYMAN BUCHWALD: Yes. 3 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: -- in another agency, a 4 GOER employee could have that investigated by a law 5 firm we've retained -- we are retaining. 6 ASSEMBLYMAN BUCHWALD: You've retained a law 7 firm, and you're employees have information on that, 8 as -- as a matter of just, like, your -- the policy 9 procedures that you provide? 10 Or -- or is it, they go to the internal 11 person that's designated, and then they refer it to 12 outside counsel? 13 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: We're in the procurement 14 process, but they would -- they -- they would go 15 file it with our administrative officer, and she 16 send it to the law firm. 17 ASSEMBLYMAN BUCHWALD: So that law firm is, 18 essentially, serving the same function, as far as 19 you're concerned, vis-a-vis GOER -- that GOER is 20 serving vis-a-vis other agencies that are within 21 your purview? 22 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: They will, yes. 23 ASSEMBLYMAN BUCHWALD: Okay. 24 Thank you very much. 25 Thank you, Madam Chair. 258 1 SENATOR BIAGGI: Last question for me: 2 So we've just established that GOER does 3 track the internal complaints of DHR? 4 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: Yes. 5 SENATOR BIAGGI: Okay. And not the external 6 complaints; correct? 7 That's what you had said? 8 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: Not the external 9 complaints -- and I'm going to get -- not external 10 complaints that are filed by anybody else other than 11 state agencies. 12 If it's a state agency, and they go to DHR, 13 we track that. 14 SENATOR BIAGGI: Okay. So what is the 15 difference between internal and DHR? 16 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: An "internal complaint" is 17 somebody who files -- who -- who follows the 18 complaint process that's established by law, that 19 says that all employers have to have a complaint 20 process. 21 SENATOR BIAGGI: Uh-huh? 22 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: If it is -- if the 23 document you're looking at says "DHR," that means 24 some State employee has filed directly with DHR, 25 pursuant to their statutory and regulatory 259 1 procedures. 2 SENATOR BIAGGI: Thank you. 3 Senator Liu. 4 SENATOR LIU: Thank you for your indulgence, 5 Madam Chair. 6 So, clearly, in your testimony, you have been 7 very clear, the policy that GOERS (sic) enforces 8 does not apply to legislative employees? 9 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: Correct, yes. 10 SENATOR LIU: Is there any reason why this 11 Legislature should not adopt similar kinds of 12 policies? 13 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: I think even -- 14 SENATOR LIU: Forget about what your boss 15 might tell you. 16 Just tell us. 17 Free yourself. 18 [Laughter.] 19 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: I'm even more reticent to 20 advise a coequal branch of government as to how they 21 should run their HR -- 22 SENATOR LIU: It's perfectly fine for us to 23 ask you advice. 24 We may -- we may to choose to take or 25 choose -- not take it. 260 1 It's perfectly fine for us to ask, and it's 2 perfectly fine for you to answer. You're not 3 tying -- binding us to anything. 4 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: I would not answer it this 5 way: I think it's incumbent upon employers to 6 prevent discrimination, and one way you do that, is 7 to prevent it when smaller incidents happen, before 8 they blow up into a bigger incident. 9 So in that regard, I think it's in an 10 employer's interest to do that. 11 SENATOR LIU: Okay, but if -- say, if there 12 is an incident, or alleged incident, or a complaint, 13 under your department, and the 130,000 employees 14 that you have some kind of authority over, would 15 there be a case where a complaint would just be in 16 limbo, like, indefinitely, or is there always a 17 clear time frame for things to be resolved? 18 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: There's -- we don't have 19 an established end date. 20 But, you know, if -- and not that there are 21 many of these, but if a complaint came in, and it 22 was of such a nature that it was criminal, and that 23 got -- that would get referred out, how long that 24 criminal process would leave the internal complaint 25 in limbo, because we wouldn't interfere with -- for 261 1 various -- for any number of reasons, with the 2 criminal complaint by investigating at the same time 3 the police were. 4 SENATOR LIU: All right. 5 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: So in that regard, that 6 could be one that's out there. 7 SENATOR LIU: Okay. Thank you. 8 Thank you, Madam Chair. 9 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Thank you so much for 10 your testimony -- 11 MICHAEL VOLFORTE: Thank you very much. 12 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: -- and your time. 13 National Economic and Social Rights 14 Initiative, Noelle Damico, senior fellow. 15 REV. NOELLE DAMICO: Good afternoon. 16 I'm Noelle Damico, the senior fellow at the 17 National Economic and Social Rights Initiative, and 18 a member of the board of the Fair Food Standards 19 Council. 20 And I wish to thank you for this opportunity 21 to testify on behalf of the Fair Food Program that 22 was created by the Coalition of Immokalee Workers, a 23 farmworker-founded human rights organization that 24 was awarded a Presidential Medal in 2015, and to 25 share the remarkable success of this program's 262 1 Worker-driven Social Responsibility paradigm in 2 ending and preventing gender-based violence. 3 In addition to my testimony, I have also 4 submitted 20 copies of 2 additional reports that 5 will provide quantitative and qualitative data on 6 both WSR and the Fair Food Program. 7 At a moment when our society is reckoning 8 with sexual harassment as never before, with these 9 hearings, the New York State Senate and Assembly 10 have stepped forward to declare our state is 11 prepared to combat these abuses vigorously. 12 The #MeToo movement has exposed the chronic 13 infection of sexual harassment and assault in the 14 workplace. 15 What is now needed is an antibiotic capable 16 of helping our body politic work together to create 17 healthy, thriving workplaces. 18 The good news is, we have the cure and we 19 know it works. 20 The cure of Worker-driven Social 21 Responsibility emerged not from the offices of a 22 Manhattan NGO, but from the sweltering tomato fields 23 of Immokalee, Florida, from an approach developed by 24 workers themselves, the true experts on human rights 25 abuses in their workplace. 263 1 In isolated, under-regulated environment of 2 U.S. agriculture, gender-based violence is severe 3 and ubiquitous. 4 As many as 80 percent of farmworker women 5 surveyed reported being sexually harassed or 6 assaulted. That's four out of five women. 7 Earning low wages, fearing retaliation, and 8 facing barriers to filing legal complaints, many 9 women elect to suffer abuse rather than report it 10 and risk the consequences. 11 As one woman put it, "You allow it or they 12 fire you." 13 But that chilling reality began to change in 14 2011 with the advent of the Fair Food Program. 15 Through the Fair Food Program, sexual assault 16 has been virtually eliminated and sexual harassment 17 has been dramatically reduced for 35,000 workers 18 laboring on program farms in seven states, 19 stretching from Florida to New Jersey. 20 Let me say that again: Cases of sexual 21 harassment by supervisors with physical contact of 22 any kind have been virtually eliminated, and workers 23 consistently report dramatic reductions in all forms 24 of harassment. 25 In U.S. agriculture, a profoundly 264 1 male-dominated industry notorious for sexual and 2 economic exploitation, in this industry, the 3 Fair Food Program has gotten to the point of 4 prevention of sexual assault and harassment. 5 The story of the Fair Food Program begins 6 with the Immokalee farmworkers' determination to use 7 the market power of retailors at the top of supply 8 chains to realize their rights. 9 The Coalition of Immokalee Workers united 10 with tens of thousands of consumers of conscience to 11 convince 14 brands, including McDonald's, Aramark, 12 and Walmart, to sign legally-binding agreements, 13 committing them to purchase only from growers who 14 implement a farmworker-defined code of conduct with 15 zero-tolerance provisions for sexual assault, and a 16 range of other protections, including the right to 17 work free of sexual harassment and to raise 18 complaints without retaliation. 19 Growers who fall out of compliance lose the 20 ability to sell to all 14 of these massive brands. 21 Participating growers, for their part, commit 22 to implement the code and to cooperate with the 23 program's monitoring organization. 24 These legally-binding agreements form the 25 backbone of the Fair Food Program which has 265 1 generated a sea change in rights realization, 2 leading "Harvard Business Review" to name the 3 Fair Food Program among the 15 most-important 4 social-impact stories of the last century. 5 The Fair Food Program works because it is a 6 system-level intervention that ends the imbalance of 7 power between employers and workers that is at the 8 root of sexual harassment, sexual assault, and other 9 abuses. 10 In short, it shifts the risk, from the worker 11 who reports sexual harassment, to the employer who 12 fails to address sexual harassment. 13 It put billions of dollars of purchasing 14 power behind guaranteeing a workplace free of 15 gender-based violence and other abuses. 16 What does this mean for workers? 17 One worker put it simply, "Now the fear is 18 gone." 19 A transgender worker spoke at length about 20 the respect that she and others on her crew receive. 21 A male worker, who observed that, at so many 22 farms, women risk losing their job if they speak out 23 against harassment or reject the advances of a 24 supervisor, he remarked how different the 25 environment is at FFP Farms. He added that, as a 266 1 man, he believes that a more respectful work 2 environment benefits him as well, and he is very 3 relieved to work in a place where women are not 4 treated poorly. 5 Because of the Fair Food Program's phenomenal 6 success in addressing sexual harassment and assault, 7 the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's Select 8 Task Force singled out the Fair Food Program, 9 calling it "a radically different accountability 10 mechanism," and adopted many of those mechanisms as 11 core recommendations in its landmark 2016 report. 12 The Fair Food Program's groundbreaking 13 approach was distilled by the Coalition of Immokalee 14 Workers into a new paradigm called "Worker-driven 15 Social Responsibility," that is translating and 16 adapting core rights mechanisms successfully in 17 other industries. 18 WSR was strengthened through the design and 19 implementation of the Accord on Fire and Building 20 Safety in Bangladesh, demonstrating the paradigm's 21 exponential potential for realizing human rights for 22 millions of workers. 23 In Vermont, Migrant Justice has adopted 24 the WSR model to the dairy industry through the 25 Milk with Dignity program, where it has proved 267 1 singularly successful in combating sexual violence 2 among a largely immigrant workforce on isolated 3 dairy farms. 4 Construction workers in Minneapolis are 5 poised to launch their own WSR program, as are 6 female garment workers in the southern African 7 country of Lesotho. 8 And in New York, the Model Alliance is 9 adapting WSR to create a truly inclusive safe and 10 fair place to work through their RESPECT Program. 11 You'll be hearing from them shortly. 12 As the magazine "Civil Eats" recently said, 13 "It's a template that, when you adjust it, can be 14 applied to almost any work situation." 15 And, indeed, that's just what's happening. 16 In response to the hearings (indiscernible) 17 for strategies to combat sexual harassment, here are 18 a few lessons from our experience that can be put to 19 work elsewhere: 20 One: Redress the imbalance of power through 21 legally-binding agreements, with consequences. 22 Whether in a government office or on a 23 factory floor, change does not come from voluntary 24 good will, but from binding agreements with serious 25 consequences for refusing to address sexual 268 1 harassment or assault. 2 Two: Provide worker-to-worker training and 3 rights, and the ability to report without fear of 4 retaliation. 5 Sexual assault and harassment are crimes of 6 power and opportunity. 7 Trained in their rights and equipped with the 8 ability to report problems through multiple 9 channels, including a 24-by-7 confidential hotline, 10 and protected from retaliation, thousands of 11 farmworkers have become front-line monitors of their 12 own rights, leaving bad actors nowhere to commit 13 their crimes. 14 Workers in other workplaces can be similarly 15 empowered and protected. 16 Third: Monitor conditions, swiftly 17 investigate, require and assist compliance, report 18 findings. 19 The Fair Food Standards Council, which 20 oversees the Fair Food Program, undertakes deep-dive 21 audits, interviewing 50 to 100 percent of workers on 22 farms. 23 Fair Food Standards Council investigators 24 also staff the 24-by-7 complaint hotline in Spanish, 25 English, and Creole. 269 1 Upon receipt of a complaint, they immediately 2 open an investigation, whatever of the hour of day 3 or night. 4 Almost 80 percent of all complaints are 5 resolved within one month, 50 percent within 6 2 weeks. 7 The FFSC is empowered to render judgments on 8 compliance and design resolutions. They provide 9 assistance to help farm employers thoroughly address 10 problems so that they don't arise in future. 11 FFSC updates its website regularly to reflect 12 current compliance by participating growers, and 13 publishes reports, providing maximum transparency. 14 Finally: Such serious consequences for 15 perpetrators and employers who fail to remedy and 16 prevent. 17 Since the program's inception, 42 supervisors 18 have been disciplined for sexual harassment, and 19 11 of those supervisors have been terminated, and 20 are, therefore, no longer able to work on FFP farms 21 in any state. 22 The removal of notorious supervisors who 23 preyed on women increased worker confidence in the 24 confidential complaint system. 25 The program also requires field supervisors 270 1 who witness sexual abuse to intervene and report, or 2 else face disciplinary action themselves. 3 Any employer that refuses to terminate an 4 employee confirmed by the Fair Food Standards 5 Council to have committed sexual harassment with 6 physical contact of any kind, will be suspended. 7 People will trust compliance systems when 8 they see them working. 9 As the New York Senate and Assembly consider 10 legislation to address sexual harassment in 11 government offices, I hope you'll consider these 12 lessons, and that you will also consider the 13 important role government can play in ending and 14 preventing gender-based violence in the workplace by 15 encouraging private-sector uptake of WSR by 16 employers, and in corporate supply chains, as well 17 as adopting WSR for government procurement. 18 With your commitment, we will surely step 19 closer to that day when all workers will labor in 20 respectful and dignified workplaces. 21 Thank you. 22 SENATOR BIAGGI: Thank you so much, 23 Reverend Damico. 24 This is an incredible paradigm for what we 25 can apply to different workplaces across the state, 271 1 including state government. 2 I'm very much looking forward to hearing from 3 The Model Alliance, who I know, last time, wanted to 4 testify, and couldn't, because the day just went on 5 so long. 6 I'm curious how -- 7 And if you don't have an answer, it's not 8 meant to put you on a spot yet. 9 -- but how do you think we as legislators can 10 implement this in the state of New York? 11 What can we do; what type of legislation can 12 we pass, and what would it look like? 13 To start this out, would it be a -- like a 14 test program first; and, if so, where would we 15 begin? 16 REV. NOELLE DAMICO: That's a wonderful 17 question, and I'd actually like to give it some 18 additional thought -- 19 SENATOR BIAGGI: Sure. 20 REV. NOELLE DAMICO: -- and consult with my 21 colleagues. 22 SENATOR BIAGGI: Sure. 23 REV. NOELLE DAMICO: But what I would say is, 24 one place to start is with some of the principles 25 that I mentioned in my testimony, and think about 272 1 how they might be comprehensively applied and 2 piloted. 3 Before the Fair Food Standards Program went 4 into full operation, we did have a pilot stage, and 5 that stage was very helpful for one year, working 6 very closely with two growers, in order to get this 7 underway. 8 And once we had it implemented, then it could 9 be expanded very well. 10 So I think a pilot approach is a great way to 11 start. 12 And what I will say is that, this paradigm is 13 very adaptable in flat workspaces, in supply chains, 14 and whatnot. 15 SENATOR BIAGGI: One follow-up question: 16 I think that one of the most significant 17 parts of what you just shared with all of us, and 18 I hope it wasn't lost on my colleagues, but I don't 19 think it will be, and I don't think it was, is the 20 effect of a legally-binding agreement, and how 21 incredibly consequential that can be to the entity 22 that has the deep pockets, or that is really just 23 focused on profit. 24 So much of what we see, when it comes to 25 sexual harassment in the workplace, is an imbalance 273 1 of power, and an end and abuse of power. 2 And having a legally-binding agreement, 3 I mean, as I'm sitting here, one of the thoughts 4 that I had, that came through my head, I -- I can 5 only imagine the day where this would happen, but 6 anything is possible -- we are here now, after 7 all -- is, imagine if you were running for office; 8 you were a candidate and you ran for office, or, you 9 had won, and you were then the elected official, and 10 you had signed an agreement with your constituents, 11 that you would not do any of the behaviors that are 12 often -- so often, tie the hands of the Legislature, 13 which is such an interesting place, because none of 14 us in the Legislature are employed by the 15 Legislature, if that makes sense. 16 Right? 17 We are, technically, employed by the State of 18 New York, but, the employer is not the Legislature. 19 It makes it very challenging. 20 And, historically, at least in the New York 21 State Legislature, so many individuals who have -- 22 who have conducted in quite egregious behavior, have 23 not been able to be held to account because the 24 standards in our laws are so high, which is what 25 we're aiming to change. 274 1 But more importantly, because of the dynamic, 2 there's really not many mechanisms to use. 3 So -- and there's political implications, and 4 we all know what they are. 5 It's very challenging, as an environment, to 6 enforce any policies against one another. 7 But it's also one of the reasons why I am 8 proud to chair the Ethics Committee. 9 So I just -- I appreciate, that I would love 10 for you to think about what that would look like, 11 and how we can put that forward in the state of 12 New York. 13 REV. NOELLE DAMICO: One thing I will say is, 14 it's important to know, this program's been in 15 operation for eight years now. 16 And over the course of its implementation and 17 operation, what we've seen is an increase in calls 18 coming in to the hotline, and a decrease in the 19 severity of the problems being reported. 20 Simultaneously, we now are operating in such 21 a collaborative manner with growers and 22 corporations, who have come to recognize that 23 cleaning up human rights abuses in the field are the 24 best form of risk management. 25 Right? Actually getting in there and 275 1 cleaning them up. 2 And every actor in the supply chain, in this 3 instance, has been incentivized to put their 4 shoulder to the plow of ending this; and, indeed, 5 it's working. 6 And so if there is one message that I want to 7 give to this wonderful group that is assembled, with 8 so much power and possibility before us, this can be 9 done. 10 And these mechanisms have proven themselves 11 in one of the most inhospitable industry, as well as 12 are being demonstrated in other industries and types 13 of workplace configurations. 14 So, I also want to invite you to become -- to 15 start thinking about this, and saying, Where would 16 this make sense inside our government system? 17 SENATOR BIAGGI: Thank you so much. 18 REV. NOELLE DAMICO: You're welcome. 19 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: I'll briefly just thank 20 you for your testimony, for the work of the 21 organization. 22 This really is -- it's amazing, the results 23 you have. 24 Just, you mentioned there was a couple of 25 other industries that have applied your model. 276 1 Have you seen any government; municipal, 2 state, government, apply this model -- 3 REV. NOELLE DAMICO: Not yet. 4 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: -- anywhere in the 5 country yet? 6 REV. NOELLE DAMICO: We've had some informal 7 conversations with different government officials in 8 different settings, but it has not been applied yet. 9 But, we'd love to make New York the first. 10 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: We'll take that back. 11 Thank you. 12 Assemblyman Buchwald. 13 ASSEMBLYMAN BUCHWALD: Thank you, 14 Mr. Chairman. 15 And I will take the privilege to ask briefly 16 of my constituent, Reverend Damico, who I'm proud to 17 call a neighbor in White Plains, about the 18 monitoring portion of the setup here, because 19 I think that's one of the topics that, 20 legislatively, we tend not to just focus on, mostly 21 because we like to set policy. But the 22 implementation policy is, obviously, extremely 23 important, and monitoring is crucial for that. 24 Can you go into, so what you feel are the 25 right metrics, in general? 277 1 You reference in your -- there's metrics to 2 monitor. 3 You reference in your remarks earlier, 4 monitoring time for review of complaints. 5 We've had some discussion of that, obviously, 6 in different contexts today. 7 But you also -- the FF -- FFSC website says 8 "updates regularly, current compliance by 9 participating growers." 10 What level of detail is provided? 11 Like, is it just, in compliance or not in 12 compliance? 13 Or -- or is it like an ongoing, you know, 14 tracking of how many complaints there, and what the 15 process is, and so forth? 16 And, more generally, for an employer, in or 17 out of government, of what you feel is the right 18 level of transparency into this, given 19 (indiscernible) also sensitivities, you know, as you 20 referenced. 21 It's not just a matter of tracking numbers of 22 complaints. In fact, you know, an increasing number 23 of complaints could be a good sign for things. 24 So what would you just say, broadly, on that 25 topic that would be informative to us? 278 1 REV. NOELLE DAMICO: Well, what I would say 2 is, we have extensive data that we use. 3 And we -- first of all, let me talk about how 4 we get the information, and then the kinds of data 5 that we report, and then how we make that available. 6 First, you'll notice I mentioned the 24-by-7 7 hotline. 8 This is an extremely important vehicle 9 because it, essentially, provides a real-time camera 10 feed, if you will, to ongoing situations. It's 11 available to all workers. 12 When workers, at the point of hire, are 13 trained with "Know Your Rights" booklets, and 14 provided a sexual-harassment video training, where 15 they see farmworkers, like themselves, speaking in 16 their own languages, acting out scenarios, to show 17 how those rights need to be respected in the field, 18 they also receive an ID badge. And on that badge is 19 the Fair Food Standards' hotline. 20 Also, the growers in the program are required 21 to establish, if they don't have one already, and 22 I'll just say at the beginning of this process, none 23 of them had it, a hotline to report. 24 And then they also have a third number to 25 call, which is the worker organization, the 279 1 Coalition of Immokalee Workers. 2 In addition to those hotlines, we also have 3 other points at which workers can have the 4 opportunity to bring a problem forward. 5 One of those points is when Fair Food 6 Standards Council auditors go into the field to 7 interview, both on- and off-site, 50 to 100 percent 8 of a farm's workforce. 9 In that time, on those interviews, workers 10 are able to bring forth any complaints they might 11 have. 12 In addition, when auditors are there, they're 13 looking at back-office processes; things that 14 farmworkers themselves, or workers in general, are 15 not going to have access to. They're going to look 16 at payroll records, for example, and make sure 17 things are in order. 18 So it's a very comprehensive audit that's 19 going on. 20 Another place where farmworkers can bring 21 forward complaints, is they can bring them forward 22 through the health and safety committees that are 23 operating on each of the farms where the Fair Food 24 Program is in operation. These are worker-led 25 organizations that gather to discuss conditions in 280 1 the field. 2 Now, you might be hearing me say workers can 3 bring forward complaints, but how do workers know 4 what their rights are, and how do they know how to 5 access this? 6 They're trained in their rights. 7 We've distributed over 250 "Know Your Rights 8 and Responsibilities" booklets, which are 9 culturally-sensitive, in terms of their preparation, 10 keeping in mind that a large number of our workforce 11 is not going to necessarily be literate. There are 12 many different pictures and symbols. They are in 13 three languages, and they're also available through 14 audio. 15 In addition to that, on the farms, at least 16 once a season, and often twice a season, workers get 17 worker-to-worker, face-to-face training, with 18 leaders from the Coalition of Immokalee Workers, 19 using popular education methodologies and other 20 interactive ways. 21 That's another place where complaints or 22 questions arise and can be addressed. 23 So workers are thoroughly educated on their 24 rights, both at the point of hire, then once they 25 hit the field. 281 1 By the way, that training, worker-to-worker 2 training, is done on the clock on company time, so 3 workers are paid for that time they're in there. 4 Crew leaders and supervisors and a farm 5 representative are also present. 6 That way, the workers know that these 7 standards are to be abided by, and they know that 8 their supervisors know, this is the right way. And 9 the farm supervisor, himself or herself, can step 10 forward and say, Our farm is committed to making 11 sure that you're working in a dignified and 12 respectful environment. 13 So that's how they know, and some of the 14 points of introduction. 15 In terms of metrics, we report different 16 types of complaints. For example: Harassment. 17 Violence. Sexual harassment with touching. Sexual 18 harassment without physical contact. 19 There are a variety of different kinds of 20 disciplinary actions that we report on. 21 We will report on: 22 Whether a grower is in compliance. 23 Whether they're on probation. There's a 24 progressive discipline process within the Fair Food 25 Program. 282 1 We provide elaborate tables. 2 Now, we're not going to say, so and so at 3 this farm; so we're not using names, and we're not 4 using farm identifiers. But we are giving numbers, 5 to give you a sense of how much compliance; what 6 that looks like, and what the results are. 7 And so, in the annual report of the Fair Food 8 Standards Council on the Fair Food Program, and this 9 is an executive summary of it -- 10 A new 2018 report is just about to be 11 released, and I'll be sure to send it to you. It 12 has all the latest metrics. 13 -- it will give you volume information: How 14 many calls have come in? How quickly have these 15 complaints been resolved? 16 When a call or a complaint gets reported, 17 guess what? There's no delay in investigating. 18 People don't have to sit around. It, immediately, 19 an investigator is on this, pursuing it. 20 So it's -- this is to say that it's a very, 21 very deep audit. 22 In fact, it -- I almost hesitate to call it 23 an audit because, when you think of auditing that 24 goes on, especially in corporate- or social 25 responsibility-type check-box monitoring, it just 283 1 doesn't even compare to that in terms of its depth. 2 Finally, the reporting that comes out the 3 other end is available in the Fair Food Standards 4 Council website. It's published. It's available 5 for researchers as well. 6 So anyone can go to FairFoodStandards.org or 7 to FairFoodProgram.org and take look at the results. 8 We have very high-level results that are 9 quickly published -- 10 What growers are in compliance, and which are 11 not. 12 Who are the participating buyers? 13 -- so that consumers as well, who, frankly, 14 have powered this movement, by pressuring 15 corporations to stand up and do the right thing, and 16 put their purchasing behind realizing human rights, 17 consumers want to know what's going on here as well. 18 And so we have different ways of representing 19 that data to them. 20 But I will certainly make sure that you have 21 the 2018 update as soon as it's published, and then 22 you can enjoy, like me, looking through all the 23 tables, because it is a beautiful thing to see this 24 data. 25 This is so beautiful; this data is showing 284 1 that it is working in a material and real way in 2 people's lives. 3 For every bit of data, there is a 4 transformation. 5 Workers are being protected. 6 Workers have a new day, where, instead of, 7 before, when they had to trade their dignity in 8 order to put food on the table for their families, 9 women are walking with their heads upright, knowing 10 that they are protected. 11 And this is important, because we can't keep 12 putting workers on the front line and asking them to 13 sacrifice. 14 Your questions earlier about, what happens 15 between a report and when this finally gets 16 processed? 17 That's a critical time. 18 In the Fair Food Program, phoom (claps hands 19 together) it's eliminated to zero. 20 And we're working together with workers to 21 protect them, and to help them through any ancillary 22 processes with employers. Or, also, if, in cases of 23 criminal behavior, the government. 24 ASSEMBLYMAN BUCHWALD: Reverend, thank you 25 for the answer, and thanks for the work you and your 285 1 colleagues are doing. 2 Thank you, Chairs, for the time. 3 SENATOR BIAGGI: Senator Mayer. 4 SENATOR MAYER: Thank you, Reverend Damico. 5 And your energy and passion, and your faith 6 in this program, is infectious to everyone here. 7 It's a welcome -- welcome after some of the 8 things we've heard. 9 And two things I just want to say. 10 One is, this program relies on market 11 consequences if there's a failure to comply. And 12 that's a model that's a little bit more difficult 13 for us to transfer, but I'm very interested in your 14 thoughts. 15 But the second point, which you sort of 16 alluded to, looking at Senator Liu, is the workers 17 have faith that this process will work for them. 18 And I think that is a factor we are 19 struggling with. 20 We have some establishments set up for 21 complaints, but there's a cynicism among ordinary 22 folks about whether these things work. 23 So I think it's -- we look forward to seeing 24 the data to show, for example, you say that 25 50 percent of complaints are ajud -- determined in 286 1 in two weeks. 2 REV. NOELLE DAMICO: Yep. 3 SENATOR MAYER: Compared to what we heard 4 earlier, about a sig -- you know, six months, you 5 know, and sometimes longer, for equally-challenging 6 factual complaints, I assume, with people, frankly, 7 who have more power than I suspect a farmworker 8 might have. 9 So, I think we want to learn from your model 10 of how to do it quickly. How to give confidence to 11 both complainants and respondents, that it's a fair 12 process. 13 So I don't mean to do all the talking, but 14 I just -- we want to translate some of your passion 15 and effectiveness to ours, and we look forward to 16 your suggestions. 17 REV. NOELLE DAMICO: Well, I look forward to 18 working with you on this. 19 I think what's so exciting is that, I had, 20 well, the unfortunate privilege of seeing what it 21 was like before, and I see the difference today. 22 And I can tell you that some of these claims, 23 I mean, there's one case vignette in the report that 24 you already have now, "The Fear is Gone," where 25 there was a field-level supervisor who had made 287 1 unwanted advances toward a woman. And then her 2 husband complained. 3 And he said, Oh, hey, I've got a gun here and 4 I'm not afraid to use it. 5 That supervisor was terminated within days. 6 So as soon as that complaint came in, it was 7 investigated, verified; that guy was gone. 8 The (indiscernible) -- people have confidence 9 in processes when they see them working. 10 So part of this is, let it -- the 11 worker-to-worker education piece is important, but 12 worker's own experience will just help other workers 13 have the courage to come forward. 14 Hey, this worked for me. This is what 15 happened. 16 Getting rid of notorious actors in a given 17 industry also sends a very strong signal that this 18 behavior will no longer be tolerated. 19 SENATOR MAYER: Thank you. 20 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Assemblywoman Niou. 21 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: Hello. 22 REV. NOELLE DAMICO: Hi. 23 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: I wanted to ask a couple 24 more practical questions, I guess. 25 You guys have to work so much with folks from 288 1 different cultures, backgrounds, languages. 2 REV. NOELLE DAMICO: Yes. 3 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: How does -- how do you 4 implement that, and how do you do your outreach on 5 that part? 6 REV. NOELLE DAMICO: That's a wonderful 7 question, and a really critical one. 8 We have the blessing, in the Coalition of 9 Immokalee Workers, of having people that speak not 10 only Spanish and Haitian Creole, but multiple 11 indigenous languages. Kichai, Q'anjob'al, 12 et cetera, that are -- Mam, from Guatemala, because 13 the workforce itself is comprised of individuals who 14 speak indigenous languages as well. 15 And so what we've done is, both, with the 16 Fair Foods Standards Council, which is an 17 independent third-party monitor, we have hired 18 investigators who are fluent in those languages, and 19 we have buttressed that support with the Coalition 20 of Immokalee Workers itself, leaders from the 21 workers' organization, who are also fluent in those 22 languages. 23 Further, we've really done a lot in terms of 24 making different "Know Your Rights" materials 25 available in those languages; again, not just in 289 1 written form, and not just in pictoral (sic) form, 2 but also in audio form, which is very, very 3 important. 4 So those are some of the ways that we've done 5 it. 6 But if you're a Haitian worker who has a 7 complaint, and you call at 2 a.m., guess what? 8 You're going to find someone who is capable of 9 responding and opening an investigation right then, 10 and you can speak in your language. 11 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: And how long did it take 12 you guys to implement language access on that level? 13 REV. NOELLE DAMICO: Well, at that level it's 14 been progressive. 15 We began with a pilot program in 2010. And 16 then the program went into effect in the fall of 17 2011. And, at that point, we were fully Spanish- 18 and English-compliant, with Haitian Creole kind of 19 on the side. 20 And then, in the subsequent years, we're able 21 to bring that forward more fully. 22 And now we have a full-time Haitian Creole 23 investigator -- -speaking investigator with the 24 Fair Food Standards Council. 25 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: How many languages do 290 1 you guys help folks in? 2 REV. NOELLE DAMICO: Our principle ones, 3 because the predominant majority speak, are Spanish, 4 Haitian Creole, and English. 5 However, there are 12 or 13 indigenous 6 languages to which we can reach for additional 7 support as necessary. 8 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: That's great. 9 And, you know, I was reading through your 10 report, and your materials here, and I just kind of 11 wanted to ask about your audits and transparency. 12 And, what are some of the things that you 13 guys have implemented to make it so that there's 14 more transparency on all levels? 15 And, then -- and -- and when -- when -- 16 I guess, when you're auditing, like, what are you -- 17 what are some of the things that you're looking for? 18 REV. NOELLE DAMICO: Well, one reason that we 19 gained such access and insight into grower 20 operations is because they have signed a 21 legally-binding agreement, saying that they have 22 agreed to give the Fair Food Standards Council that 23 kind of access in order to assure their buyers that 24 their operations are, indeed, in keeping with the 25 Fair Food Standards' code of conduct. 291 1 So one thing is, we don't have to fight for 2 access. That is part of what's in the agreement to 3 begin with; so it's expected. 4 Of course, you know, it takes a while for 5 employers to get used to this. 6 So, on day one, you know, it was, oh, really, 7 you have this? And -- you know. 8 You have to work through it. 9 But at this point, it's a very regularized 10 and respected operation, one reason being, that the 11 growers have found it incredibly helpful for their 12 own operations. 13 So, when we go in, we're going in in a 14 variety of ways. 15 We're going in with individuals who are 16 interviewing workers in the fields. 17 We're going to take a look at the back-office 18 processes that has to do with hiring, firing, 19 transportation. It would have to do with payroll 20 decisions, and a number of other decisions that they 21 would be making. 22 And we have different metrics by which we are 23 assessing their operation, and they need to be able 24 to demonstrate a very, very high level of 25 compliance. 292 1 And if they don't, the Fair Food Standards 2 Council doesn't just say, All right, you're gone. 3 We work on compliance assistance. 4 Now, on the zero-tolerance offenses, if 5 there's a situation of forced labor, oh, you're 6 gone. 7 But, then, there is the opportunity for such 8 employers to come back into the program, and regain 9 access, by the way, to the buying from all those 10 14 massive brands that they will have lost by -- 11 from being kicked out, if they are able to 12 demonstrate that their systems have undergone a 13 renovation. 14 And that's also true of supervisors or 15 co-workers who may be fired due to 16 sexual-harassment, for example. They can come back 17 in after going through a retraining. 18 But if they have a second violation, then 19 they're gone for the year, and, a third, they're out 20 permanently. 21 And, so, having that progressive kind of 22 discipline also underguards again the idea that it's 23 better for us to be open and transparent as a 24 grower-employer, because that's going to benefit us, 25 it's going to clean up the circumstances in the 293 1 field, get rid of any bad actors, and then help us 2 become more productive. 3 So in terms of some of the things that we're 4 measuring for, those are some examples. 5 And, I mean, it's such a comprehensive 6 list -- there are, like, 37 different categories -- 7 that I think it's most easy to take a look at in the 8 tables that I provided. You can have a quick 9 look-see in the Fair Food Program report, and then 10 in the subsequent report that I provide. 11 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: And I -- and I love 12 that, you know, you were saying that more people 13 were willing to report. And, then, that the things 14 that were reported have been decreasing in their -- 15 I guess -- their -- 16 REV. NOELLE DAMICO: Severity. 17 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: -- severity. 18 And that means that more people are actually 19 talking about their -- the issues that are coming 20 up. 21 And I also love that your goal is for things 22 to be "just expected." 23 And, also, that you're looking for trust and 24 for faith in your system. 25 I think that folks also probably hope that 294 1 they have -- can have trust and faith in their 2 government, and, also, that things should be "just 3 expected," that they can be in a harassment-free 4 workplace. 5 And, so, I -- I wanted to say thank you for 6 your efforts on this. 7 And -- and I wanted to kind of ask, also, 8 this is my final question, because I know there's so 9 many others, but: 10 When did you start to see that difference? 11 And how many years did it take to start 12 seeing that there was an increase in -- in -- in 13 folks who are willing to -- to speak up, but also a 14 decrease in the severity? 15 REV. NOELLE DAMICO: I would say we got to 16 point of prevention, specifically on sexual 17 harassment and assault, in year three. 18 In terms of the use of the hotline, I want to 19 emphasize, it's a hotline that is used for many 20 different kinds of complaints, not only for sexual 21 harassment. 22 It's the same one that you would call if you 23 had some problem and felt that you were missing 24 wages that you were owed as well. 25 And, so, as workers use the hotline for other 295 1 abuses that they encounter, or problems that they 2 encounter, they gain confidence that way as well. 3 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: Thank you so much. 4 REV. NOELLE DAMICO: You're very welcome. 5 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Assemblywoman Simon. 6 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMON: Thank you very much for 7 your testimony. It's very joyful, and it's 8 wonderful, to watch you and to listen to you. 9 Thank you so much for your work. 10 I was not here when you started, so I don't 11 actually have a copy of your testimony. 12 But I wanted to ask, how many farms are 13 involved in this program? 14 REV. NOELLE DAMICO: There are about 15 35 farms, that are stretching, from Florida, all the 16 way up to New Jersey, that employ about 17 35,000 farmworkers. 18 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMON: Okay, that was my next 19 question. 20 35,000. Okay. 21 And you said the program went into effect 22 fully in 2011? 23 REV. NOELLE DAMICO: 2011, yes. 24 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMON: Okay. 25 And what are you doing next; like, what's 296 1 your next big move? 2 REV. NOELLE DAMICO: Ah-ha. 3 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMON: Now that this is 4 working, how do you plan to expand it? 5 REV. NOELLE DAMICO: Well, it's -- it's began 6 with the Florida tomato industry. And we began to 7 expand, first, to tomato fields beyond Florida that 8 were under the purview of growers who were based in 9 Florida, already participating in the program. 10 So that was our first wave of expansion. 11 And then we went with those growers into 12 other crops, such as strawberries and bell peppers. 13 And we're in the process of expanding to 14 other states and other crops. 15 In our work, it's a matter of getting a 16 combination of the growers and the buyers to do that 17 expansion. 18 We also have an active consumer wing that is 19 working to bring new corporations on board. We have 20 14, some of the biggest-named corporations. 21 You've heard of McDonald's; Burger King; 22 Subway; Whole Foods Market; Ahold, which owns 23 Stop & Shop and Giant and Martins; Walmart; Aramark; 24 Sodexo. 25 So there are a lot of companies that are in. 297 1 Unfortunately, Wendy's has refused to join 2 the program, is an outlier. It's beyond 3 disappointing, frankly, it's shameful, given that 4 this is a program that is working so effectively 5 right now. 6 But that's the other way the program expands. 7 When a new company comes in, it -- our -- 8 that supply chain then opens, and the possibility 9 opens anew. 10 And so we're really looking forward to 11 bringing Wendy's on board and expanding there as 12 well. 13 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMON: Great. 14 And I have another question, sort of very 15 practical, sort of "back to when you started" 16 question -- 17 REV. NOELLE DAMICO: Sure. 18 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMON: -- and that is: How 19 did you physically get your workers to organize? 20 That can be very, very difficult. It's just 21 labor-intensive. Can be expensive. And workers who 22 have never experienced having any power in their 23 lives are going to have, I would imagine, a much 24 more difficult time getting their heads around how 25 this could actually, fundamentally, change things. 298 1 I'm curious if you could talk about how that 2 happened. 3 REV. NOELLE DAMICO: Absolutely. 4 The story begins about 25 years ago, 5 actually, back in 1993, when some individuals, who 6 had come to the United States from Mexico, 7 Guatemala, and Haiti, began meeting together, to 8 talk about violence that they were experiencing in 9 the fields in the Immokalee region. 10 Now, what was interesting about these 11 workers, is that each of them had had experienced 12 defending their human rights in their home country. 13 So we had some individuals who had been 14 popular educators from the Mouvman Peyizan Papay in 15 Haiti. It's the Haitian small-farmer movement that 16 was very instrumental in resisting the Duvalier 17 regime, and is a very -- has very advanced 18 methodology for analyzing one's political situation, 19 and taking action to change it. 20 We also had workers from Chiapas, and workers 21 from Guatemala, who had been through the civil war. 22 And these were all workers who had 23 experience, not defending their individual rights, 24 but defending their community rights. 25 So they had a very human rights, large-scale 299 1 model that they brought. It was a -- kind of a 2 reverse-technology transfer, if you will, from the 3 global self to the fields of Immokalee. 4 As they began to meet, they first were 5 ignited because, a young farmworker, in his teens, 6 was beaten within an inch of his life for asking for 7 a drink of water in the fields. 8 And the worker group, the Coalition of 9 Immokalee Workers, had just formed, you know, a few 10 years prior, and was getting off the ground, and 11 thinking about how it would move next, when this 12 happened. 13 And that ignited the entire community. 14 And the worker stumbled into the office of 15 the Coalition of Immokalee Workers in a bloody 16 shirt. And they picked up the shirt, and they 17 helped the worker, and they decided to march to the 18 crew leader's house that night. 19 And they started off with about 25 people in 20 front of their offices. 21 And by the time they got to the crew leader's 22 house, there were several hundred workers, shouting, 23 "An injury to one is an injury to all." 24 And that was the day, really, when, for the 25 first time, the workers in Immokalee felt the power 300 1 of what it meant to act together. 2 And they refused to go to work any longer in 3 that crew leader's farm who had harmed that worker 4 so badly. 5 There was a change at that moment, because 6 those crew leaders who operated like petty dictators 7 in the fields, who had divided them between race and 8 language and stature; there's all kinds of 9 discrimination that was used to keep workers 10 separate from each other. 11 The reason the Coalition of Immokalee Workers 12 is named the" "coalition" is because they came 13 together in that moment and stood together, moving 14 forward. 15 That's how it began. 16 And they further were empowered to do several 17 hunger strikes, a 30-day hunger strike; two massive 18 work stoppages. 19 Of course, they didn't have any money, no 20 strike funds, so they could only stay out for a 21 week. And during that time, one of the growers was 22 heard to say to another, "Why don't we just maybe 23 sit down at the table with these workers?" 24 And the other one replied, "The tractor 25 doesn't tell the farmer how to run the farm." 301 1 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMON: Wow. 2 REV. NOELLE DAMICO: That's where things 3 were. 4 Now think of where things are. 5 From people thought of as mere implements, 6 actual machines, to be used, expendable, to full 7 partners in an industry where their unique position 8 as workers provides the critical insight necessary 9 to making human rights real on the ground in a 10 granular way. 11 Not just a lofty statement of, fair wages, 12 but a, no overfilling of the buckets. Not a great 13 statement as, we're against sexual harassment. 14 But this is what it looks like: this is how 15 it manifests, and this is how we're going to stop 16 it. 17 It's an extraordinary story. 18 Susan Marquis, who is the dean of the 19 Pardee RAND Graduate School, wrote a book, "I Am Not 20 a Tractor," which tells the most in-depth telling of 21 this. 22 And so I would commend that to you, if you're 23 interested. 24 And I'm happy to tell more stories and give 25 you more insight. 302 1 But when those workers saw, not only that 2 they could stand together, but that consumers were 3 ready to move with them, that became important. 4 And I think there's an analogy here with 5 government. 6 To think, you know, we have, as citizens and 7 residents, we care about these matters. This is 8 about our lives, our families' lives. You're not 9 just out there alone. 10 Just remember, there are so many of us that 11 are counting on you, and are prepared to step 12 forward and support this really important work that 13 you're doing. 14 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMON: Thank you very much. 15 REV. NOELLE DAMICO: You're welcome. 16 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Thank you. 17 Oh, you have a question. 18 SENATOR BIAGGI: I have one final question, 19 it's just a technical question. 20 How are -- how is the organization funded? 21 REV. NOELLE DAMICO: That's a great question. 22 We're funded in two different ways. 23 We receive some foundation grants for the 24 Fair Food Program. 25 And then the other source is, we're funded at 303 1 the grassroots, through the Fair Food Sustainer 2 Program. 3 So, thousands of consumers across the 4 country, people of good will, pledge to support this 5 work by making a monthly donation. 6 And you can read more about all of that on 7 FairFoodProgram.org. 8 SENATOR BIAGGI: Thank you so much, 9 Reverend Damico. We appreciate you, and your 10 testimony today. 11 REV. NOELLE DAMICO: You're very welcome. 12 Thank you for this, and, thank you, please, 13 all of the -- the work that you're doing here. 14 All of those late nights that you spend 15 pouring over the details, it matters, it matters so 16 much. 17 Thank you to all of you for the extraordinary 18 opportunity that you're taking in this moment. 19 This is the time! 20 We can do it! 21 We can do it! 22 The people in this room, are ready to help 23 you! 24 Don't give up! 25 We're going forward together, we're going to 304 1 end this. 2 Thank you. 3 SENATOR BIAGGI: Thank you. 4 [Applause.] 5 SENATOR BIAGGI: Next up is the 6 Model Alliance, and, Sara Ziff, the founder and 7 executive director of the Model Alliance, will be 8 testifying. 9 SARA ZIFF: Good afternoon. 10 Thank you for hosting this hearing, and for 11 giving me the opportunity to testify today. 12 My name is Sara Ziff, and I am a longtime 13 model, and the founder and executive director of the 14 Model Alliance, which is a non-profit research, 15 policy, and advocacy organization that advances fair 16 treatments and equal opportunity in the fashion 17 industry. 18 Too often, models are treated as objects, and 19 not as legitimate members of the workforce who 20 deserve to be treated with the same dignity, 21 respect, and basic legal protections that other 22 workers enjoy under New York State's sexual 23 harassment and employment laws. 24 Not withstanding the success that I've had as 25 a model over the last 20 years, I, like many of my 305 1 peers, have experienced inappropriate demands, 2 including routinely being put on the spot to pose 3 nude and provide sexual favors. 4 In some cases, modeling agencies are sending 5 models to known predators, and putting them in 6 compromising situations that no person, and 7 certainly no child, should have to deal with. 8 Essentially, all professional models operate 9 under fixed-term exclusive contracts to their 10 modeling agencies who exert a great deal of control 11 over their working lives. 12 The agencies then contract with a client -- a 13 brand, a magazine, department store, or the like -- 14 for the model's work. 15 If a model is harassed in the workplace, to 16 whom can she turn? 17 Is it the agency, who will blame the client 18 for the unsafe workplace? 19 The client, who will say that they have no 20 contractual relationship with the model? 21 For models and other independent contractors 22 in this type of triangular relationship, there's 23 still no clear remedy. 24 Moreover, most modeling agencies assert that 25 they are not regulated by New York State laws 306 1 governing employment agencies, which would subject 2 them to the necessary licensing and regulation. 3 Even though the primary purpose of modeling 4 agencies is to obtain employment for their models, 5 they claim that these activities are incidental to 6 the general career guidance that they provide as 7 management companies, and, therefore, are not 8 subject to the State's regulation. 9 I believe that this is an issue, and I've 10 been banging the drum on this for almost a decade 11 now. 12 This is something that should be investigated 13 by the New York State Department of Labor. 14 So two years ago, I brought these concerns to 15 Assemblywoman Nily Rozic. 16 I had done a research project with the legal 17 clinic at Fordham Law School on the working 18 conditions of models. And when it came to sexual 19 harassment, the law professors there were all 20 mortified by what they found, and surprised by the 21 very limited scope of the law. 22 The Model Alliance has since worked with 23 Assemblywoman Rozic to introduce the Models 24 Harassment Protection Act. 25 If enacted, it would extend certain 307 1 protections to models, putting designers, 2 photographers, and retailors, among others, on 3 notice that they would be liable for abuses 4 experienced on their watch. 5 The bill would amend the current law to 6 explicitly include models, explicitly forbid sexual 7 advances and remarks or other forms of 8 discrimination linked to their employment, and it 9 would require clients to provide models, upon 10 booking, with a contact and avenue for filing any 11 complaints. 12 Now, models in New York State need specific 13 provisions because they work in this very convoluted 14 employment chain. 15 Agencies in New York say that the models are 16 independent contractors, not employees. 17 The agencies also claim to act merely in this 18 advisory capacity, saying that bookings are 19 incidental to them providing advice. 20 When a client books a model through an 21 agency, the model has no direct contract describing 22 the scope of work with her client. 23 So, essentially, we have fallen through the 24 holes of the existing statutory safety net, and that 25 means that, until now, in New York, which is 308 1 regarded as the heart of the American modeling 2 industry, it's been unclear where legal liability 3 for job-related sexual-harassment lies. 4 There's been a very long history of 5 institutional acceptance, or, at a minimum, 6 recklessly ignoring sexual harassment by both 7 agencies and clients. 8 We believe that models should have the same 9 recourse as all employees to sue employers. 10 They should have a direct mechanism for 11 making complaints, and should be assured that courts 12 are willing and able to hold the agency and the 13 client, their joint employers, responsible for the 14 abuses they have suffered. 15 Regardless how we're classified, it's 16 imperative that we have an enforceable right to work 17 in a safe and fair environment. 18 So New York State can remedy these 19 shortcomings by passing the Models Harassment 20 Protection Act, and the perceived glamour of this 21 business, and the gaps in the law, should no longer 22 be used to deny models a safe workplace or 23 appropriate recourse if abuse occurs. 24 We really deserve no less than any other 25 member of New York's workforce. 309 1 And this wasn't part of my prepared remarks, 2 but, I know you just heard in the last testimonial 3 about Worker-driven Social Responsibility. 4 We have learned a lot from the farmworker 5 women, from CIW and the Fair Food Program. Over the 6 last year, we have adapted that model for the 7 fashion industry. 8 That's also another initiative that we're 9 excited about. 10 Our program is called the "RESPECT" program, 11 and RESPECT is like the Fair Food Program; a 12 legally-binding program that will provide a 13 much-needed safety net, not just for models, but for 14 freelance creatives working in the fashion industry, 15 more broadly. 16 It includes a neutral third party to 17 investigate and resolve claims of sexual harassment 18 and retaliation. 19 And we believe that if a company is serious 20 about protecting us, that they will be willing to 21 commit to enforceable standards with real teeth. 22 We've campaigned for the last year. It's 23 very difficult to get a company to sign on to make 24 that -- you know, be the first one to jump. 25 310 1 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Thank you. 2 So the Models Harassment Protection Act, has 3 any other state implemented a model like this, or a 4 policy like this? 5 SARA ZIFF: This is something we've been 6 working on for the last couple of years, at least. 7 We did champion legislation in California, 8 the Talent Protections Act, last year. That 9 legislation looks a little bit different, in part, 10 just because there isn't quite the same issue with 11 management companies and how they're structured in 12 California, versus here. 13 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: So, look, I'll -- I'll 14 just say this, and -- my wife did some modeling when 15 she was younger, and would tell me some horror 16 stories of what she experienced, even as a minor, 17 participating in some events. 18 And it is -- it's mind-boggling that an 19 industry as relevant, where -- and particularly here 20 in New York, to your point, right, and you made it 21 in your testimony, with the biggest players in the 22 market operating or based in New York, and that this 23 issue has not been more thoroughly addressed, 24 especially in this movement, right, with #MeToo and 25 with Time's Up, and with everything else that's gone 311 1 on, that more hasn't been done around this industry 2 in particular. 3 So I'm -- I'm -- as -- I'm new to the 4 Committee on Labor, but I'm going to immediately go 5 back and take a look at the differences, and why we 6 are not treating modeling agencies as employment 7 agencies. 8 And I think you've made some very good 9 points, that we're very interested to go back and 10 look at. 11 So I appreciate your testimony. 12 SARA ZIFF: Thanks, I appreciate it. 13 SENATOR BIAGGI: I just have a few quick 14 questions, and just one -- uhm, just overall broad 15 comment on your work that you've done for so many 16 years, through the Fashion Law Institute, and the 17 modeling law class that I actually took at Fordham 18 Law, with Doreen and Ally (ph.) -- 19 SARA ZIFF: Oh, okay. 20 SENATOR BIAGGI: -- in 2008, that you had 21 come to speak at. 22 And I think that one of the most glaring 23 things that was so clear to me, was that there are 24 these known abusers in every single industry. 25 And with modeling, it's everywhere. It's the 312 1 photographers, it's the agents; it's all over the 2 place. 3 And one of the things that seems to be so 4 challenging, especially if you are a disruptor in 5 that system, where you clearly know, this is the way 6 that we can change it. 7 Passing this law would create a 8 relationship -- or, a legal chain of a relationship 9 that can hold someone to account. 10 And this kind of goes a little bit to what we 11 just heard in terms of that testimony. 12 It's -- and I think Assemblywoman Simon had 13 touched on this, too, in your question of: How do 14 we get -- how do they know how to organize? 15 So my question is: 16 It's one step after that. 17 It's -- you know, after you organize, how do 18 you get people who are in the system to join you? 19 Because there's such a culture around just 20 letting -- like, letting it go, because, again, of 21 the imbalance of power. 22 And I know that you're using this, the 23 RESPECT model. 24 But it is -- it's incredibly challenging. 25 Right? 313 1 So if we pass -- let's say we pass the 2 Model's Harassment Protection Act, that's -- that's 3 a huge step in the right direction. 4 But before that point, and then after that 5 point, how do we continue to make sure that people 6 are able to feel safe when they can speak up, and 7 still have their livelihood? 8 Because so many men and women in the modeling 9 industry, and agent -- and -- and world, rely on the 10 agencies and the photographers. And, you know, some 11 of the best photographers are some of the worst 12 abusers. 13 Just like some of the best legislators are 14 some of the worst abusers. 15 Right? 16 It's everywhere; it's everywhere in the whole 17 world. And I've always said this, but it's an 18 epidemic. 19 And so I really would be curious to hear your 20 point on that, because that really matters when 21 we're thinking about laws, because we can change 22 laws till kingdom come. 23 But the cult -- like -- I would argue that 24 the culture has reached the point, but it hasn't met 25 everybody where they're at. 314 1 SARA ZIFF: Right. 2 Yeah, no, that's an important point. 3 And I think, at the moment, people -- 4 there's -- people just feel that they can act with 5 impunity -- 6 SENATOR BIAGGI: Right. 7 SARA ZIFF: -- because they can. 8 And, you know, I remember calling out a 9 well-known photographer who shoots for -- has shot 10 for many of the, you know, biggest brands and 11 magazines, and even photographed the President of 12 the United States; and, yet, was known, it was just 13 an open secret, was sexually harassing and 14 assaulting even minors. 15 And, you know, I know because I saw it 16 firsthand. 17 And yet all of these, you know, big 18 prestigious companies continued to work with this 19 person. 20 And -- and it's not just about any one 21 person. This is pervasive throughout the industry. 22 And it's really not until the #MeToo and 23 Time's Up movements, through the power of publicity, 24 that we've been able to be heard, despite pushing 25 this forward for a very long time. 315 1 SENATOR BIAGGI: I have one just follow-up 2 question. 3 Have you considered, and I think the answer 4 is yes, but I'm not sure, the unionization of 5 models? 6 SARA ZIFF: Uh. 7 Before I started the Model Alliance, 8 I approached established unions and asked if they 9 would extend membership to us. 10 They said it was impossible because we're 11 told that we're independent contractors. And under 12 federal law, we cannot unionize. 13 SENATOR BIAGGI: So what makes models 14 different from actors and actresses? 15 SARA ZIFF: That's a very good question. 16 Under -- so, legally, actors are actually 17 considered employees. 18 SENATOR BIAGGI: Of whom? 19 SARA ZIFF: I would believe of the 20 production. 21 SENATOR BIAGGI: That is so remarkably 22 ridiculous because it's an analogous structure. It 23 makes no sense. 24 SARA ZIFF: It makes no sense. 25 SENATOR BIAGGI: Wow. 316 1 SARA ZIFF: Yeah. 2 SENATOR BIAGGI: Thank you. 3 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Assemblywoman Simotas. 4 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMOTAS: Sara, thank you for 5 coming to tell us the truth about what happens in 6 your industry. 7 My question is very specific about, 8 potentially, what we can do about retaliation, 9 which, in your business, would be blacklisting 10 somebody. 11 I could see how it could -- would be easy for 12 a photographer or for some -- for some label to say, 13 Well, you don't look the part. 14 But it could be because you're trying to 15 complain about, you know, a predator. 16 SARA ZIFF: Uh-huh. 17 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMOTAS: How would we be able 18 to structure? 19 We have strong retaliation laws in the state 20 of New York. Like, you're not supposed to retaliate 21 against people if you complain about something, that 22 you feel like you're being harassed. 23 But I think in the modeling industry it's 24 going to be different, because of just the way that 25 the business is run. 317 1 How do -- do you -- have you thought about 2 how we can prevent blacklisting of models, and maybe 3 create a repository, something, that could be more 4 helpful than just claiming that you're being 5 retaliated against, or blacklisted, and not really 6 being able to prove it? 7 SARA ZIFF: Sure. 8 Yeah, it's a tricky question when you're 9 talking about the gig economy, and -- where you 10 don't have, necessarily, regular work, or one steady 11 client. 12 And I think -- we do, however, have exclusive 13 multi-year contracts with our agencies. 14 And I think, you know, I've seen -- I saw 15 myself, while working as a model, and also in other 16 cases that have come to us through our grievance 17 reporting line, that agencies have, you know, 18 dropped models after they have reported sexual 19 harassment or assault. They have failed to, like, 20 promote models' careers any longer, submit them for 21 jobs. 22 So I think -- I think there are some clear 23 indications that -- that -- you know, that would 24 show retaliation, at least from the agency side. 25 But maybe that's something that the last 318 1 person who testified, and the folks at the Fair Food 2 Program, could speak to more, since they also deal 3 with contract workers. 4 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Assemblymember Quart. 5 ASSEMBLYMAN QUART: Yeah, just a quick 6 question. 7 Thank you for your testimony. 8 Having just had the benefit of reviewing a 9 modeling contract, it really shocked me how unequal, 10 what the leverage is, almost to the extent that the 11 young person, and it usually is a young person, is 12 almost as if an indentured servant in some sort of 13 way. 14 I think changing the labeling, from an 15 independent contractor, to employee, is a good 16 start. 17 But in other areas of the law in the state, 18 we, the Legislature, can step in when the balances 19 of power between two parties are imbalanced, if you 20 will. 21 Has any -- have you or your organization 22 given any thought to things that the Legislature 23 should do, policy-wise, on the contract end of 24 things? 25 Because we do legislate in that area, in 319 1 insurance law, and other places, to try and give 2 more power to young, mostly young women, who are 3 going to become models, because, based upon the 4 contract, it is a desperate situation as I read 5 those contracts. 6 SARA ZIFF: Yeah, no, thanks for raising that 7 point. 8 The contracts tend to be entirely one-sided 9 in favor of the agency. 10 Often it's, you know, 16-, 17-, 18-year-old 11 girls who are signing these contracts. It's an 12 aspirational industry. They don't -- they sign on 13 the dotted line, they don't negotiate. And, 14 frankly, they don't have any bargaining power. 15 And I question whether many of these 16 contracts are even enforceable, frankly. 17 But that's -- you know, certainly, the 18 contracts that these models are held to, where they 19 are, essentially, working in debt to their agencies. 20 And some of these are children, who are, you 21 know, here, sponsored by these modeling agencies to 22 work here, from Eastern Europe, Brazil, and 23 elsewhere. 24 It's -- yes, thank you for recognizing that. 25 I'm not quite sure what the answer is, but 320 1 it's certainly on our radar. 2 ASSEMBLYMAN QUART: Thank you. 3 SENATOR BIAGGI: I have just one follow-up 4 question. 5 That was an excellent question, and, 6 Assemblymember Quart, thank you for raising that. 7 When -- when child models are signing 8 contracts, is a par -- a parent, I'm assuming, is 9 required to be present? 10 SARA ZIFF: Yeah, I mean, it's not -- it's 11 not enforceable if you sign it when you're under 18. 12 SENATOR BIAGGI: Right. 13 SARA ZIFF: Right. 14 SENATOR BIAGGI: Because that's 'cause child 15 labor is illegal. 16 That's quite interesting. 17 I wonder if there's a mechanism in contract 18 law? 19 You know, we'll see. 20 Thank you. 21 SARA ZIFF: Thanks. 22 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Thank you. 23 SARA ZIFF: Thanks so much. 24 SENATOR BIAGGI: Next we will be hearing from 25 Marissa Hoechstetter. 321 1 Thank you. 2 I hope I pronounced your name correctly. 3 MARISSA HOECHSTETTER: Hoechstetter. 4 SENATOR BIAGGI: Hoechstetter? 5 MARISSA HOECHSTETTER: It's okay. 6 SENATOR BIAGGI: Hoechstetter. Okay. 7 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Hi. Yep, you can begin. 8 MARISSA HOECHSTETTER: Okay. 9 Thank you for the opportunity to address you 10 today about how the lack of oversight of physicians 11 and other licensed medical professionals puts 12 employees and patients in danger. 13 I chose to testify because, while the 14 hospital and clinics where I was sexually assaulted 15 were not my workplace, they are someone's workplace. 16 I'm going to do the best I can today. 17 No hospital or doctor's office, no workplace, 18 should ever put their reputation and profit ahead of 19 their patient's safety. 20 Real improvements must be made so that 21 workers and patients, particularly the most 22 vulnerable among us, are not needlessly and 23 repeatedly exposed to sexual harassment and assault. 24 Most doctors are well-intentioned, caring 25 people dedicated to their field, but the minute you 322 1 walk into a doctor's office they have power over 2 you. 3 It's a unique profession. 4 There are often legitimate reasons for a 5 doctor's hands to be on or in your body. 6 Those who abuse this do not deserve 7 protection. 8 I'm going to briefly share a little bit of my 9 story, and then, in the context of this hearing, 10 share what I've learned about sexual harassment and 11 sexual assault in health care. And, I'm going to 12 refer to a number of studies that I have included in 13 the attachments. 14 As a patient at Columbia University and 15 New York Presbyterian Hospital from 2009 to 2012, my 16 OB/GYN performed overly-touchy exams, made 17 inappropriate comments about my body, examined me 18 without nurses in the room, and, on my last visit, 19 undoubtedly, sexually assaulted me. 20 When I realized what was happening, I never 21 went back. 22 The assaults and the experience of coming 23 forward have fundamentally changed my life. 24 I know now that what happened to me was 25 allowed to transpire because of a lack of action by 323 1 his employers and a lack of oversight by regulators. 2 For 20 years this predator retained power 3 over patients and staff, and used that for sexual 4 gratification. 5 Despite more than 20 women reporting to the 6 police and the Manhattan District Attorney, Hadden 7 ultimately only pled guilty to crimes against just 8 one victim, two minor counts called down from a long 9 list, a list that would have been longer had the DA 10 included me and others in the case. 11 Nurses who worked with him claimed to have 12 reported his behavior to supervisors going back 13 decades. 14 His employers have yet to take any 15 responsibility, and victims continue to come 16 forward, even as recently as last week. 17 There are probably hundreds, or even 18 thousands, of others out there. It's a sickening 19 list. 20 Some of us like me were pregnant. Some were 21 minors, including one that he himself had delivered. 22 Some had their babies in the room with them. 23 His own defense attorney said during the 24 criminal trial that he -- Hadden had over 25 30,000 patient visits. 324 1 Okay. 2 A recent study found that most sexual 3 misconduct by doctors involves a combination of 4 important factors. 5 100 percent of the perpetrators were male, 6 and 85 percent of them examined patients alone. 7 96 percent of known cases involved repeat 8 offenses, And the abuse was often accompanied by a 9 milder, more visible behavior, such as comments and 10 touching, over 90 percent of the time. 11 Yet these same researchers wrote, "It's not 12 possible to provide an accurate estimation of the 13 frequency of sexual violations in medicine. Most 14 patient-victims do not report." 15 And one study estimated that fewer than one 16 in 10 victims come forward, which is much lower than 17 an overall rate of cases of rape and sexual assault 18 in the United States. 19 When you pair this information with reports 20 from the National Academy of Sciences, Engineering, 21 and Medicine that says up to half of medical 22 students have experienced some form of sexual 23 harassment, and another study published in the 24 "Annuls of Internal Medicine," that up to 70 percent 25 of female physicians have reported sexual 325 1 harassment, it is clear that health care has a 2 sexual-harassment and sexual-assault problem. 3 In New York, the education department issues 4 licenses to practice medicine. 5 Discipline is split between two offices under 6 the department of health: 7 The office of professional and medical 8 conduct (OPMC), which investigates reports of 9 incompetent or unethical doctors; 10 And the board of professional medical 11 conduct, which adjudicates those cases and decides 12 on punishments. 13 This is not just a few people in a backroom 14 somewhere, it's a whole system; staff, 15 investigators, board members, administrative law 16 judges reviewing cases, all using public money with 17 a mission to protect the public. 18 New York is one of only six states that does 19 not conduct a background check as a requirement of 20 initial licensure for medical professionals. 21 This might make New York attractive for those 22 with a criminal record to seek licensure here. 23 The National Practitioner Databank, a 24 resource only available to state boards, established 25 by Congress in 1986 to prevent practitioners from 326 1 moving state to state without disclosure or 2 discovery of previous damaging performance. 3 A survey of databank users found that about 4 21 percent of matched query responses contain new 5 information. 6 This means that in states that reviewed -- 7 when states reviewed a doctor's application for 8 licensure, they found new information that had not 9 been self-reported on applications about a quarter 10 of the time. 11 A quarter of the time they're not telling you 12 the whole story. 13 If New York doesn't conduct background checks 14 and doesn't sufficiently query the databank, we are 15 letting physicians get away with lies and omissions 16 and putting the public at risk. 17 In 2014 the New York Public Interest Research 18 Group found that over 77 percent of doctors 19 sanctioned for negligence by OPMC were allowed to 20 continue to practice. 21 Think about that: 77 percent of doctors that 22 were sanctioned were allowed to continue to 23 practice. 24 Nearly 60 percent of those actions were based 25 on sanctions by other states, the federal 327 1 government, or the courts; not the result of some 2 action that OPMC had actually taken. 3 So an example of that is, the plea that my 4 abuser made, a condition of that was him 5 surrendering his license to the State. 6 OPMC had nothing to do with the loss of his 7 license. 8 And because of a lack of transparency, 9 there's no way to know if he had been previously 10 reported or disciplined. 11 In New York, staff and peers are required to 12 report to the OPMC any information that reasonably 13 appears to show that a doctor is guilty of alleged 14 professional misconduct within 30 days. 15 Hospitals are also required to report when a 16 doctor's clinical privileges have been curtailed or 17 have -- they've resigned to avoid discipline. 18 It's very common that they resign before 19 they're actually disciplined and then there's 20 something on their record. 21 But, there's no penalty for not doing so, and 22 there's no way to know if they're following the law. 23 In my case, Columbia and New York 24 Presbyterian had plenty of notice, but it does not 25 appear that they ever reported Hadden to OPMC. 328 1 And, I'd ask people to think if it's 2 realistic to imagine the hospital is going to raise 3 its hand and self-report that they've been employing 4 a sexual criminal. 5 Because I speak publicly about my assault, 6 victims regularly contact me, seeking help, and most 7 have never heard of the OPMC. 8 I've spoken with OPMC staff who do not 9 understand or could not clearly communicate what is 10 in their jurisdiction. 11 I specifically asked if sexual harassment of 12 a hospital staff member by a doctor, for example, 13 was reportable, and I was told, that "it depends." 14 People should report the harassment so that 15 OPMC can review the complaint and determine if it's 16 in their jurisdiction or not. 17 How can we expect patients or employees to 18 know what and where to report when we're not clear 19 about whose responsibility it is to investigate or 20 discipline? 21 One thing that's unique, as I understand it, 22 there's actually no time limit, so no statute, on 23 being able to seek justice from the OPMC for a 24 doctor who has abused or sexually harassed you. 25 They are required to investigate all complaints 329 1 regardless of when they occurred. 2 We encourage victims to speak up, but when 3 they do, they are often met with a justice system 4 that doesn't offer much relief or, as I've learned, 5 much justice. 6 In addition to mustering the courage to come 7 forward, we must overcome mountains of disbelief, 8 inertia, and prosecutorial discretion. 9 Despite OPMC's flaws, the public should be 10 aware of the office as a resource, especially when 11 other criminal justice systems are likely to let us 12 down. 13 Last year, "The Village Voice" reported on an 14 osteopathic doctor from Great Neck who admitted to 15 verbally harassing a patient and sending her 16 inappropriate text messages. He was fined $10,000, 17 and required to be chaperoned anytime he saw a 18 female patient. 19 He then broke that rule two years later, and, 20 as of yesterday when I checked, his license is still 21 active. 22 Time and again we see abuse happen even when 23 others are present. 24 Think of the Nassar cases. 25 In addition to putting a patient in a 330 1 vulnerable position with a previously abusive 2 doctor, the chaperon, the person assigned to follow 3 them, who themselves has an employer-employee 4 relationship with the doctor, has to themselves work 5 in a potentially toxic environment. 6 Boards are knowingly putting criminals back 7 in private situations with their previous victims. 8 Think of what we know now about the Catholic 9 Church, where clergy, with credible allegations of 10 abuse, were simply moved to new environments to, 11 supposedly, perform differently under new 12 supervision. 13 The public doesn't know enough about the 14 practice of chaperons to be outraged, but they 15 should be. 16 And, I'll note, that it's not public 17 information why the chaperon is there. 18 So you go in, and there's just another person 19 in the room. 20 And I think many of us, you go into a 21 doctor's office and, you know, there might be other 22 nurses, other staff. 23 So it's not publicly known why that person is 24 assigned to be there. 25 So if you could choose between two doctors, 331 1 one with a chaperon and one without, I think most of 2 us would choose the one who had not been 3 disciplined, requiring a person to be there with 4 them. 5 I could go on. 6 Patients and medical staff who visit or work 7 with a doctor have a right to know their full 8 disciplinary history. 9 California recently became the first state to 10 require that doctors notify their patients if they 11 are on probation by the Medical Board of California 12 for wrongdoing, including sexual misconduct. 13 The Patient's Right to Know Act puts the onus 14 to inform the public on the provider and the state 15 board, not on the victim. 16 A 2016 Consumer Report survey showed that 17 82 percent of Americans favor the idea of doctors 18 having to tell patients they're on probation, and 19 why. 20 Doctors' offices could be required to post 21 signage about patients' rights, promoting OPMC's 22 website as a resource. 23 We know that victims turn to the Internet 24 privately, seeking information about sex crimes, 25 statutes, and reporting our support resources. 332 1 OPMC must also update its website. 2 The word "sex" only appears in one buried 3 place. There is nothing that explicitly mentions 4 sexual harassment or assault of -- as professional 5 medical conduct that is within their purview. 6 Think about that: It's an office. I mean... 7 The word "sex" appears only in one buried 8 place as an example of something. 9 The site does offer a link to relevant state 10 laws which could potentially offer more clarity for 11 those who can understand them. 12 Under relevant education law, which offers a 13 definition of "professional misconduct" applicable 14 to physicians, the word "sex" only appears in 15 relation to a definition of "misconduct" under the 16 field of psychiatry. 17 There is a statement that professional 18 misconduct can be willfully harassing, abusing, or 19 intimidating a patient either physically or 20 verbally. 21 Again, I don't think it's explicit enough. 22 Under the relevant Public Health Law, which 23 explains the penalties for misconduct and 24 proceedings for the OPMC, neither the word "sex" or 25 "harassment" appear anywhere. 333 1 The word "abuse" appears only in relation to 2 drug and alcohol abuse. 3 The relevant laws should clearly state sexual 4 harassment and sexual abuse as crimes that are 5 considered professional misconduct for physicians. 6 I hope that my remarks today help shed light 7 on sexual harassment and sexual assault in medicine. 8 Doctors are an important part of our lives, 9 and have specialized knowledge that we rely on to be 10 happy, healthy, and productive, but they're not gods 11 who deserve to be protected at all costs. 12 There's a lot more I can say, but, for now, 13 I'll share that it's my hope that state re -- that 14 the state resources already set up to protect us 15 can, at a minimum, be made more visible and 16 accessible, and that the role in curbing these 17 crimes can be clarified, and that we can work 18 together to support victims. 19 Thank you. 20 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Thank you. 21 Wow. 22 First of all, thank you for coming forward 23 and telling your personal story. But, you've shed 24 light on an area that I think a lot of us would 25 easily overlook. 334 1 I assume, whenever I walk into a 2 medical-facility, appointment, whatever, when my 3 daughters go there, that the people there are 4 highly, you know, regulated, they're licensed, there 5 must be tremendous amounts of oversight. 6 What you've presented shatters all of those 7 beliefs and raises significant questions. 8 I just want to share that. 9 I think we have to do a lot of follow up 10 on -- on -- you present a lot of ideas that can lead 11 to potential legislation. 12 But, simply, I just want to thank you for -- 13 for bringing forward something unique to this whole 14 conversation. 15 MARISSA HOECHSTETTER: Thank you for 16 listening. 17 SENATOR BIAGGI: I echo my Assembly 18 Co-Chair's sentiment, and thank you for being so 19 incredibly brave, for sharing your story. It's not 20 ever easy, and it doesn't necessarily get easier. 21 But, you create a space for so many other 22 people when you speak up, and we're very grateful 23 for that. 24 And you -- that's -- I mean, you put a light 25 in an area that I would never even think about. 335 1 I mean, I'm thinking now about all the 2 doctors that I have gone to, dentists. I mean, if 3 you just -- now it's just -- goes down the list of 4 things. 5 How many times has somebody been in a room 6 with me and the doctor? 7 That's alarming. 8 That's alarming, and it's negligence in so 9 many different ways. 10 And the way that you laid out your testimony 11 is so helpful to what we're trying to achieve here 12 right now, because you do it in a way that gives us 13 clear gaps in the law, so that we can put bills in 14 place for these types of things. 15 And, you know, all of your examples go 16 through, and then you mentioned California so many 17 times. 18 And I really would be remiss if I didn't say 19 how incessantly disappointed I am as a legislator, 20 and as a New Yorker, that New York is constantly 21 second to California's lead on so many things. 22 They are trailblazing in ways that I don't 23 even think we know yet. 24 But it's great that we have -- 25 MARISSA HOECHSTETTER: California, you can 336 1 sign up to get text messages if there's a 2 disciplinary action against your doctor. 3 SENATOR BIAGGI: Oh, my goodness. I mean, 4 that's remarkable. That's good to know. 5 MARISSA HOECHSTETTER: They have challenges 6 for sure there with the medical board, but they 7 are -- they have some really great ideas I think 8 that could be looked at. 9 SENATOR BIAGGI: Sure. 10 I mean, that's incredibly helpful for us. 11 And I think the fact that California has done 12 it already means that we have a model. 13 So even though we can be a little envious of 14 their leadership, we can still use them as a ally 15 and as like a sister state for us. 16 One of the things I just want to ask you 17 about, if you are comfortable -- 18 MARISSA HOECHSTETTER: Sure. 19 SENATOR BIAGGI: -- responding to, you 20 mentioned that -- well, first of all, I want to just 21 say, this doctor, and the behavior of this doctor, 22 is incredibly egregious, and it's criminal. 23 To have, as one of the lines in your 24 testimony, that some of them were minors, including 25 one that the doctor had delivered, is disgusting. 337 1 It's disgusting. 2 And that person should not be able to have 3 the privilege of practicing medicine in the state of 4 New York. 5 So going back to what you had mentioned in 6 that paragraph, which was the Manhattan District 7 Attorney's Office: 8 So 20 women reporting to the police and the 9 Manhattan District Attorney. 10 Okay. 11 I have several friends who have reported 12 these types of acts to the police. 13 And I think one of the things that's very 14 clear is that police officers are not necessarily 15 trauma-informed in this specific subject, so that's 16 a different topic. 17 But when you talk about the Manhattan DA, and 18 the application of the law to specific facts and 19 circumstances, that is what a lawyer and an ADA 20 should be able to do. 21 So I'm curious about, when the Manhattan 22 District Attorney had, I guess, reviewed these 23 cases, if you -- I don't know of the extent to which 24 you know, so any details surrounding that, because 25 that's alarming, in so many ways, seeing what's in 338 1 front of us, and knowing that it went to the 2 Manhattan DA. 3 And do you know the timing of when it went 4 there? 5 MARISSA HOECHSTETTER: There's a lot I could 6 say about that. 7 SENATOR BIAGGI: You don't have to if you're 8 not comfortable. 9 MARISSA HOECHSTETTER: No, I can. 10 It's something I think that's worthy of a 11 whole other hearing. 12 SENATOR BIAGGI: Wow. 13 MARISSA HOECHSTETTER: I -- what I have 14 learned since going forward to the DA, and 15 subsequent litigation that I'm currently involved 16 in, and other things, the extent to which -- and 17 some has been made of this, you know, publicly, the 18 extent to which political contributions, 19 friendships, networks, and effort, I believe, 20 really, to -- I don't think anybody cared about this 21 doctor. I think it was an effort to protect the 22 reputation of his employers. 23 And I hope that our litigation will provide 24 an opportunity to reveal some of what we believe, 25 this case was handled very badly. 339 1 When I went in and reported what happened to 2 me, I was told that I was outside of the statute of 3 limitation. 4 I know now that that was a lie. 5 And part of what spurs me on to talk about 6 all the parts of my experience; reporting to the DA, 7 learning about the medical board, you know, talking 8 to people, I mean, this is all stuff that I have 9 just learned and taught and sought out for myself, 10 because I was not able to get justice through the 11 criminal justice system. 12 I mean, we tell people to report. We have 13 ridiculously short statutes of limitation. 14 And we have people that, when you come 15 forward to report a crime, I believe that most of 16 the people, I mean, people who are report -- you 17 know, presenting to you earlier today, I believe 18 that they look at someone like me as work. I'm one 19 more person; I am somebody that now is going to 20 require them to do more work. 21 And that's how I see it. 22 And so I think there's a real incentive for 23 some of these people to look at the case and say, if 24 they can win or not, or, you know, there's a lot of 25 factors there. I mean, there's a lot to talk about. 340 1 But -- 2 SENATOR BIAGGI: Can you talk a little bit 3 about the statute of limitations, a piece of it? 4 So the statute of limitations you were told 5 was expired. 6 MARISSA HOECHSTETTER: It depends on how you 7 define what the crime against me was. 8 I define it as first-degree rape. 9 So I don't think there's a statute of 10 limitation against that. 11 How the -- and, honestly, I know we're 12 talking about statutes right now. 13 I think one of the reasons to get away from 14 all these different little definitions, is that 15 people use different things against you, and they 16 can say, Well, I see it this way, and so, therefore, 17 it's this crime, or, it's misconduct, or, it's 18 forcible touching, or, all these other things. 19 It's all wrong. 20 And as a victim, I mean, I really did 21 research. I tried to understand the law before 22 I came forward, and, it's confusing. 23 It's confusing. 24 And that's why, I mean, I've said it here, 25 like, the fact that the med -- the state office 341 1 responsible for disciplining doctors does not have 2 the word "sex" anywhere on there. Not "sexual 3 harassment," not "sexual abuse," not sexual 4 misconduct." 5 Nothing. 6 Why would I think that they're an office that 7 has a resource for me? 8 In my case, it is unique, he did lose his 9 license. 10 He -- I got to sit in court and watch him 11 plead guilty, not to crimes against me, but to 12 someone else. 13 That is extremely rare. 14 I'm, like, following a trajectory that almost 15 nobody gets. 16 And I do feel a responsibility because, I've 17 seen that, and I've learned from this process. 18 I feel a responsibility to tell the story. 19 It's a -- it's almost like a privilege that 20 I can say that and do that. And I really believe 21 that, if I can't, you know, who can? 22 And so I'm trying. 23 But -- so in this context and this 24 opportunity, I wanted to talk about the state 25 medical board. 342 1 I think there is a lot to be said and 2 discussed about statutes, about prosecutorial 3 discretion. Our lack of recourse is none, there's 4 none. 5 If they don't pursue your accusation, you 6 have no recourse, except, for example, this is one 7 way you could go get justice, right, you could go to 8 the state medical board. 9 But nobody knows about them. 10 No one -- I mean, I didn't know that they 11 existed until I read that as a detail of the plea, 12 and then I looked into it. 13 So it's not a resource that people know 14 about. 15 SENATOR BIAGGI: Wow. 16 I think that some of the notes that you 17 touched on, I won't go into details about them at 18 all. 19 But, the criminal justice system not serving 20 justice is a theme that I think all of us here are 21 very much aware of, and are working on, and have 22 worked on significantly this year. 23 The influence of political contributions and 24 money in politics, the -- it's -- you know, it's not 25 surprising that it's shown up here in this room, but 343 1 it's something that is on our radar. 2 And I think this is also one of the 3 challenges -- analogous challenges in the 4 Legislature as well, that I'm glad that you brought 5 it up in this instance, because I think it's 6 important to take it out of the context of politics 7 and put it into, you know, the normal course of 8 business. 9 And I just want to really thank you for 10 sharing all of your testimony, and being so 11 forthcoming. 12 And to your point of, it's a privilege, it 13 is, but it is also not required. 14 So, it's really remarkable and transformative 15 that you are using that for good. 16 So thank you for doing that. 17 MARISSA HOECHSTETTER: Thank you. 18 Thank you. 19 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Assemblywoman Simotas. 20 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMOTAS: Marissa, thank you 21 for being here. 22 You said that you're a victim. 23 You're not a victim; you're a survivor. And 24 that's really important. 25 I've been working in the arena of rape laws 344 1 and sexual-assault laws now for quite a while, and 2 I've met a lot brave individuals who've been willing 3 to come forward and tell their story. 4 And what you provide to us, and to the rest 5 of society, is a spotlight on the problems. 6 And we happen to be the people who can try to 7 fix them, but without you, we would never have been 8 made aware of these gaping holes. 9 I want to ask you a little bit about the 10 office of professional medical conduct and your 11 experience reporting, and just ask you: How can we 12 do a better job telling the public that this office 13 exists, and allowing people who may have complaints 14 to navigate the process? 15 I assume that it wasn't so easy for you to 16 report or navigate the system. 17 How could we make it better? 18 MARISSA HOECHSTETTER: So thank you for 19 saying that, and thank you for that question. 20 I have seen, and I think it was 21 North Carolina, that did a study, that only -- and 22 only 10 percent of the public knew about their 23 medical board. 24 So I think, at a minimum, people need to know 25 the office exists. 345 1 There are some states that require signage to 2 be posted, with a website. 3 Again, I think the website needs to be 4 improved. 5 But, I mean, at a minimum, I think there's 6 some public-relations work that needs to happen. 7 You know, we think a lot about health care, 8 like, what happened to me was in a big hospital, 9 there's people around. You imagine that there might 10 be somebody to go to. 11 A lot of this -- these things happen, I mean, 12 individual doctors have private offices. There's 13 one staff member, or two staff members, there. 14 And you're putting the onus of reporting or 15 knowing where to report on someone who themselves is 16 an employee of that -- that physician. 17 So it's tricky, but I think that there's 18 some, you know, minute -- like, public-relation 19 stuff, having it available. 20 Making sure that different support groups, 21 like, you know, birth groups, people that work with 22 mothers. There's different -- there's -- excuse me, 23 there's different -- there's the AMA; there's ACOG; 24 there's different organizations that work in 25 medicine. All of the medical schools. 346 1 I mean, I tried to keep my remarks to my 2 personal experience, but, I mean, Times of Health 3 Care just launched. There's incredible data and 4 stories of how pervasive -- I listed a few 5 statistics -- how pervasive sexual harassment is for 6 medical residents and students. 7 That's not something that I, you know, 8 personally can speak to, but I think there's an 9 opportunity to educate people before they are 10 officially in the workforce. 11 You know, you can have mandated chaperons. 12 So not in the sense that I said, but you can 13 require that, for certain types of exams, there's 14 alway -- there always has to be a second person in 15 the room. 16 I don't know that that will always curtail 17 this. And a lot of what we see, I think it's 18 probably almost impossible to prevent a first 19 occurrence, but it surely should be possible to 20 prevent repeat occurrences, especially when you see 21 the statistics of how frequently these people are 22 repeat offenders. 23 So I think informing the public, which is 24 part of why I'm here and trying to do this. 25 I think making the law and the language 347 1 around OPMC more visible. 2 And I think, when you have it, the 3 responsibility spread out between the department of 4 education, and then these two offices under the 5 department of health, it's not clear where to go. 6 So perhaps the department of education and 7 the department of health could also have a 8 responsibility, even if they're not the office 9 responsible, to be responsible for informing the 10 public of where to go. 11 Uhm... yeah. 12 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMOTAS: One more question. 13 Is information that's filed, or complaints 14 filed, with OPMC, is it public? Is there any way we 15 can go and check to see who filed the complaint 16 against who? 17 MARISSA HOECHSTETTER: No. 18 What you can see publicly is final actions. 19 Now, again, this is how I understand it, you 20 can see a final action; so if a doctor's license was 21 revoked, suspended, or surrendered. 22 You cannot see if there were files -- 23 complaints filed that didn't result. 24 I mean, right, again, you might want to see a 25 pattern of behavior. 348 1 And I think the number I shared was something 2 like 77 percent of doctors are allowed to continue 3 practicing. 4 So there's a lot of people out there who 5 probably have a disciplinary history. 6 And I'm speaking from a sexual-assault, you 7 know, perspective. 8 There -- this also -- a lot of what I'm 9 talking about applies to the opioid epidemic, for 10 example. There are examples of doctors prescribing 11 medication in exchange for sex. 12 So, like, there's an intersection of a lot of 13 things related to health care that I think could 14 be -- could benefit from some legislation here. 15 It's not just sexual assault, because they leverage 16 that power for people who are the most vulnerable. 17 But, yeah, it's -- it's not public. 18 I mean, there's some information online, but 19 it's pretty limited. 20 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMOTAS: Marissa, again, 21 I can't thank you enough for being here and publicly 22 sharing your story. 23 MARISSA HOECHSTETTER: Thank you. 24 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMOTAS: Thank you. 25 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Quick question, before 349 1 I go to the next. 2 MARISSA HOECHSTETTER: Yeah. 3 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: The chaperon component, 4 we talked about it in terms of, if a chaperon 5 requirement is imposed on a doctor. 6 But does a patient have the right at any 7 given time to bring a chaperon with them to a test 8 or an appointment, that you're aware of? 9 MARISSA HOECHSTETTER: I believe that, yes, 10 you can request that. 11 It is -- I under -- I mean, someone else here 12 might know it. 13 It's my understanding that you can always 14 request that. 15 I think it could be mandated, especially in 16 certain circumstances. 17 What's tricky, and, again, I'm telling you my 18 experience, there can be someone in the room, and 19 then they leave, and you're already in a vulnerable 20 position. 21 So it's not perfect, but I think if you say, 22 you know, there has to be someone in the room for 23 these certain types of exams, or, that you can 24 always request it, that is the law as I understand 25 it, but there's no signage, for example. 350 1 So, you know -- 2 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: In theory (indiscernible 3 cross-talking) -- 4 MARISSA HOECHSTETTER: -- you might not know 5 that that's available to you. 6 So I do think that that's something, again, 7 we need more, you know, education around. 8 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Appreciate that. 9 Assemblyman Gottfried. 10 ASSEMBLYMAN GOTTFRIED: Question, just sort 11 of mechanical: Do we have your testimony 12 electronically? 13 MARISSA HOECHSTETTER: I did submit it, yes. 14 ASSEMBLYMAN GOTTFRIED: Oh, okay. 15 MARISSA HOECHSTETTER: But I can get it to 16 you also. And I submitted all the various 17 attachments too. 18 ASSEMBLYMAN GOTTFRIED: Okay. 19 Well, if -- if the Chairs have it, I can get 20 it from them. 21 Uhm -- you know, as I've chaired the 22 Health Committee in the Assembly for quite some, 23 and, from time to time, we've tried to deal with 24 legislation relating to the physician discipline 25 system. 351 1 You know, in my experience, OPMC, you know, 2 it's kind of like, if you were talking about a 3 sheriff in some rural county in Mississippi, if you 4 discovered that there were some people in the town 5 that the sheriff, you know, treated extraordinarily 6 harshly, and other people in town, who the sheriff 7 left them do anything they wanted, you would 8 understand what was going on. 9 And in some ways, OPMC is like that. 10 There are people in the medical profession 11 that they come down on very hard, and people in the 12 medical profession who they never touch. 13 And the -- the secrecy of the proceedings, 14 including, not letting the complainant know what's 15 going on, is certainly a major problem. 16 So bottom line is, we'll look into this, and, 17 I imagine, be in touch with you. 18 I think there's a lot here that needs to be 19 looked at. 20 So I appreciate your raising these issues 21 with us. 22 MARISSA HOECHSTETTER: Thank you. 23 As I understand it, you know, a number of the 24 things I've raised have been considered for decades 25 in the state. Some of these are not new. 352 1 But I do think, as we've seen with some of 2 the other testimony, we're at a different moment 3 where we need to recognize. 4 That's why, even just putting some of the 5 language online. 6 I didn't include this here, and I don't 7 remember the number exactly, but if I remember 8 correctly, it's something like 260 days that it 9 takes to do an investigation. So, that's almost a 10 year, often -- well, I'm going to round up a little 11 bit -- when that person is still practicing. 12 So another thing, as you mentioned, they come 13 down really hard on some people, and not on others. 14 Most -- as I understand most of the board, 15 it's something like two-thirds professionals and a 16 third public. 17 So, you're -- you're, essentially, having 18 peers/doctors discipline other doctors. 19 And even the publicly-appointed members, the 20 public members, often have ties to the medical 21 industry in some way. 22 I think that's something that, you know, 23 I would question. 24 I'm not saying those people are not well 25 intentioned, but, that's, I think, a lot of the 353 1 reason why you see people, they're saying: 2 Well, you know, it was a mistake; 3 Or, we're going to send this person to, you 4 know, training, and they're gonna go back to work 5 with a chaperon, and it's going to be fine. 6 You know, at some point, I think we have to 7 care more about the people that they're harming than 8 this one person's career. 9 And I get the doctors are an expensive 10 investment, but, our lives are. 11 And I think we need to see a shift on what 12 their priority is. 13 Thank you. 14 ASSEMBLYMAN GOTTFRIED: Thank you. 15 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Assemblyman Quart. 16 ASSEMBLYMAN QUART: Marissa, thank you for 17 being here. 18 The State of New York has given you every 19 reason never to step foot in this state again, but, 20 here you are. 21 And thank you for your testimony. 22 I want to talk a little bit about 23 Columbia University, and our large, sacred 24 institutions in this city and state. 25 Now, I know you have a civil lawsuit. 354 1 But the civil courts are a difficult place to 2 seek justice because the end result is usually 3 compensation. It will unlikely end with an 4 admission or a change of policy. And we have to 5 deal with statute of limitations in civil court, 6 which -- beyond the army of lawyers that you and 7 your attorneys will have to deal with. 8 But this Legislature is not bound by a 9 statute of limitations to conduct its oversight 10 responsibilities of our large institutions, which, 11 in this very building, through the council, I'm sure 12 has received largess and land use, and all of that, 13 through state government as well. 14 What would you like to see this Legislature 15 do with respect to holding large institutions, like 16 Columbia University, accountable for what I'll 17 describe as its likely failures to provide any 18 oversight over a sexual predator that was in its 19 midst for two decades? 20 MARISSA HOECHSTETTER: It's a hard question 21 for me to answer. 22 You know, the State already has mandated 23 reporting, so, you have that. 24 But because none of this is -- it's not 25 public to see if somebody's even been reported, it's 355 1 very hard to hold anyone accountable. 2 Another example in California, if it's found 3 to be that a hospital knew, and did not report, they 4 have fines of, I think, around $100,000. There's 5 some different fines. 6 That's actually not that much money, 7 considering how much money these nonprofits make. 8 And health care is -- they make a lot of 9 money on health care. 10 The hospital and the university, their 11 partnership, I mean, a lot of this is in their 12 annual report. 13 And their reputation matters a lot. 14 And so I think when you have a system that 15 is, essentially, asking them to self-report, 16 especially in an environment where people bring 17 lawsuits, again, that's one of the only tools that 18 we often have to hold people accountable. 19 It's tricky. 20 So I think there has to be real consequences. 21 When you are found to have known something, 22 to have had notice -- 23 And, in my case, I really believe that they 24 had notice for decades. 25 -- and when you have been found to have had 356 1 notice, and not reported it, you have to be held 2 accountable. 3 So, I don't know if that is monetarily or 4 through, you know, different accreditation. 5 Uhm... yeah. 6 It's a tricky thing, especially, I think, in 7 New York City, where you have such a concentration 8 of the money and politics and these employers, and 9 it's all just so connected. 10 So, if the chair of Columbia's board is a law 11 partner with Harvey Weinstein's lawyer, and they're 12 all making contributions to the DA, like, it's 13 all -- it's all the same thing, it's all a network. 14 So, I mean, that question is hard to answer. 15 Like, how do -- how do you hold people 16 accountable? How do you infiltrate that? 17 You know, I -- you have to expose it, and you 18 have to hold people accountable. 19 And people have to feel like coming forward 20 matters. 21 I have been really fortunate over the last 22 year since speaking publicly, that I do feel like 23 people are listening to me. 24 And I'm the only non-anonymous person of 25 dozens. I mean, I talk to a lot of these other 357 1 women. 2 It's crazy that I find myself and my life 3 being the only non-anonymous person, but that's 4 where I am. 5 And hearing from all these other women makes 6 me feel -- makes me able to, you know, keep going. 7 But I do not feel like people have been held 8 accountable yet. 9 And what I'm doing has to matter, and so I'm 10 not going to stop talking about it. 11 I'm not going to stop talking about it until 12 there are different people in certain elected 13 offices, I'm not going to stop talking about it 14 until the influence of money and politics is 15 changed, and until patients are really safe, and 16 feel like they have recourse, somewhere to go. 17 And that comes down to statutes, it comes 18 down to state offices, it comes down to holding 19 people accountable when they have notice and they 20 don't act. 21 So, that's probably more of an answer than 22 you wanted, but that's how I feel about it. 23 ASSEMBLYMAN QUART: No, it's -- I think 24 it's important for people to know that, 25 Dr. Hadder (sic) -- accountability, which you talked 358 1 about, Dr. Hadder (sic) was a 63-year-old doctor. 2 Okay, so they took away his law (sic) license, but, 3 he was able to retire to his home in New Jersey. 4 And nobody sought -- 5 MARISSA HOECHSTETTER: I mean, is he -- is he 6 getting a pension? 7 Is he -- I mean, there's some real questions 8 that, again, the criminal case had an opportunity, 9 I think, to look at that, and they didn't. 10 And so there's a limit to what, you know, 11 civil litigation can do. 12 But I believe that we have yet to see the 13 worst of it, unfortunately. 14 ASSEMBLYMAN QUART: And it's my hope, under 15 the leadership our Chairs, that, in future hearings, 16 we can poss -- we can seek to explore the 17 accountability, or lack thereof, of our large-scale 18 institutions in this city and state who have failed 19 you. 20 MARISSA HOECHSTETTER: Thank you. 21 Thank you. 22 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Assemblyman Epstein. 23 ASSEMBLYMAN EPSTEIN: I also want to thank 24 you for being here, and really bringing issues to 25 light. 359 1 And -- so what we're talking, like, is 2 systemic change, and I understand the struggle about 3 figuring how to get to it. 4 But do you think more ways to hold 5 institutions accountable for the behaviors of 6 their -- you know, their employers to figure out 7 systems and structures? 8 Like insurance -- like, if you want to change 9 how people drive, insurance companies affect how 10 people operate their vehicles; they create rules. 11 And, so, do we hold hospitals and 12 institutions accountable for the acts of their 13 staff, maybe they would do better training, go back 14 to medical school? 15 Is there -- are -- so just I'm trying to 16 think through some of the structural things that we 17 need to be doing to prevent people in those 18 positions to be happening in the first place. 19 Have you thought through those issues, and 20 where the structural changes has to happen to ensure 21 that people are not put in these positions? Or 22 people who think that -- 23 MARISSA HOECHSTETTER: I have ideas about 24 that. 25 I appreciate that question because I think 360 1 you bring up important points. 2 I don't know that I am, as an individual, you 3 know, an expert to say enough. 4 I know that some of the things that I've 5 raised have come before the Senate and the Assembly 6 before, and have been taken out of legislation by 7 the insurance industry, by the medical industry, 8 themselves. 9 So it is, you know, medical malpractice. 10 I mean, there's -- there's -- we're talking 11 about a whole area, I think, with insurance. It's 12 expensive, and there's a lot of liability there. 13 So I don't know that I'm the best person to 14 talk about that. 15 I think, also, my -- because I'm in 16 litigation, I don't really want to talk about that. 17 But, as I understand, there is history with 18 some of what I'm talking about. 19 And there have been industries that you would 20 think are supposed to help protect the public, are 21 themselves lobbying to keep this stuff out of it. 22 ASSEMBLYMAN EPSTEIN: And what role do you 23 think the medical schools have to -- and nursing 24 schools have, in this conversation? 25 MARISSA HOECHSTETTER: I think they have a 361 1 huge role. 2 We saw the launch in -- I believe in 3 December, or just recently, of Times of Health Care. 4 They're working to get hospitals and medical schools 5 to sign, you know, pledges. 6 As I understand it -- and I have a family 7 member in medical school, actually, right now -- 8 there's no classes, there's no training, there's 9 really nothing, about how to interact with patients. 10 I mean, it should be obvious that you should 11 not abuse your patients, but, it apparently needs to 12 be explicitly stated. 13 The Federation of State Medical Boards, which 14 is an association of groups like the OPMC, they 15 actually use a definition called "sexual 16 misconduct." 17 I think, you know, we're not even really 18 using the real words, and so some of this is like 19 getting really basic, like, putting the word "sex" 20 and "sexual harassment" and "sexual abuse" on the 21 website. 22 Doing some basic, sort of, you know, PR work 23 around -- around these offices. 24 Working with medical schools. 25 Yeah, it's a big challenge, and I'm sorry 362 1 I don't have all of the answers. 2 I've appreciated learning, and I want to 3 continue learning, and I think work with people who 4 are experts and maybe have more history, you know, 5 in this than I do. 6 But I wanted to sort of raise some of these 7 questions because I think they matter. 8 We're talking a lot about health care in a 9 lot of other context at the moment, and this is part 10 of it, you know, for me, and many other people. 11 ASSEMBLYMAN EPSTEIN: Thank you. 12 MARISSA HOECHSTETTER: Thank you. 13 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Assemblywoman Niou. 14 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: Hi. 15 MARISSA HOECHSTETTER: Hi. 16 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: Is it okay if I ask a 17 couple of more personal questions? 18 MARISSA HOECHSTETTER: Of course. 19 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: I don't want to -- if 20 you're ever uncomfortable, just, please, feel 21 like -- you know, you don't have to answer. 22 So going back to OPMC, how -- and the BPMC, 23 how did you even find out that they existed? 24 MARISSA HOECHSTETTER: I found out they 25 existed because, in the plea agreement that he 363 1 signed, it said he had to surrender his license. 2 And I wanted to see that that had actually 3 happened. 4 And so I found the office. I found -- they 5 do -- this is something that is there. I can 6 actually see the letter that they sent him, saying, 7 Send in your license. 8 And it's really funny because it says, Don't 9 send us the frame that it's in. 10 It's, like -- anyways. 11 It actually says: Don't mail the frame in 12 with us. We don't store your frame. But send us 13 the actual paper license. 14 That's how I realized there was an office. 15 And then I started, you know, looking into 16 it. 17 And I'm a member now of a group called the 18 Medical Board Roundtable, which is a national group 19 of advocates really committed to understanding 20 medical boards. 21 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: And -- so how did you 22 report, since you couldn't use what they had set up? 23 MARISSA HOECHSTETTER: So I did not report to 24 the medical board. 25 I reported to the district attorney's office, 364 1 and at that point I was led to believe that my 2 reporting to them was all that I could do at that 3 point. I mean, they never suggested, for example, 4 that I go to the OPMC. 5 Uhm... yeah. 6 And then -- yeah. 7 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: So what -- what led -- 8 what did they say to lead you to believe that that 9 was all you could do? 10 MARISSA HOECHSTETTER: They said that my 11 accusation was outside of the statute of limitation. 12 And they appreciated me coming forward. And that 13 perhaps I could be used in Molineux -- that my 14 statement could be used in Molineux. 15 That was it. 16 There are other women who saw the same 17 doctor, who did report to the state medical board. 18 Within a few months of -- he was arrested in 19 2012, and he stopped practicing within a few months. 20 So at that point he wasn't actually 21 practicing, even though he was still employed by the 22 university. 23 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: I mean, when 24 Senator Biaggi was talking about how (indiscernible) 25 somebody else didn't have to be in the room, I was, 365 1 like, just as stunned about learning that we didn't 2 need to conduct a background check. 3 MARISSA HOECHSTETTER: It's kind of crazy. 4 Right? 5 I mean, I don't know why you wouldn't do that 6 as a condition of initial licensure. 7 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: Sure. 8 MARISSA HOECHSTETTER: Yeah. 9 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: So it's not a condition 10 of initial licensure. 11 It's not a condition of -- I mean, for law 12 school, for law students, you know, you're not 13 allowed to have committed a felony. And there's a 14 lot of different things that make it so that you 15 can't get your law license. 16 So I would think that there should be 17 something. 18 So I really appreciate you're bringing that 19 up. 20 I'm working on a bill now. 21 MARISSA HOECHSTETTER: Thank you. 22 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: But I -- I also wanted 23 to ask: So when -- when you -- when you found out 24 that they -- so, that these organizations existed, 25 the OPMC, the BPMC, when you found that out, what -- 366 1 what -- did -- when you -- did you talk to them? 2 Like, what was the -- did you go before them? 3 MARISSA HOECHSTETTER: I did reach out to 4 them because I wanted to know if other people had 5 reported him. 6 So I understood that he lost his license as a 7 condition of this plea. 8 And now I understand why the DA made such a 9 big deal about that being "a win," because it is, in 10 fact, quite common for doctors to lose licensure in 11 one state and go seek it in another state, 12 especially a state without background checks. 13 So I -- sorry, ask the question again? 14 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: Did you go to -- did -- 15 how did you reach them? What did you say to them? 16 How did you -- 17 MARISSA HOECHSTETTER: Oh, right. 18 So I reached out, I called. I've also -- 19 I called, and wanted to know, you know, could I see 20 anything else? 21 And, no, you -- you know, you're -- you 22 can't. You can only see final actions. 23 I have also -- I've spoken publicly at 24 events, and I've met members of the OPMC's board, 25 and I've asked them questions. 367 1 And I've also called and spoken with other 2 staff members since, just in sort of a personal 3 advocacy way. 4 Like, for example, asking if sexual 5 harassment is covered, you know, in their 6 jurisdiction. 7 And them basically saying, "It depends." 8 And maybe there's good reason for that, 9 I don't know. 10 I just think we need to be clear about what 11 is and what isn't covered. 12 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: So they never asked, 13 like, to hear more about what happened to you? 14 MARISSA HOECHSTETTER: No, uh-uh. 15 No. 16 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: Interesting. 17 MARISSA HOECHSTETTER: No. 18 Uhm... yeah. 19 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: And -- 20 MARISSA HOECHSTETTER: In fact, in one 21 instance, and I don't want to make this personal, 22 but, there is one person who was very proud to tell 23 me that they were responsible for him losing his 24 license. 25 And I replied by saying, that OPMC had 368 1 nothing to do with it. 2 Right? 3 I mean, it was because of the plea. 4 They might have signed the paper, saying he 5 had to turn it in, but they -- it was not because of 6 anything they did. 7 And they might say that they never knew about 8 it, and that might be true. 9 But the point is, there were plenty of 10 opportunities along the way when they should have 11 been notified and been able to act, especially if 12 you have mandated reporting within 30 days. 13 But, if no one does it, then there's no way 14 to follow up on it. 15 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: That's right. 16 You gave us a lot to work on. 17 Thank you. 18 MARISSA HOECHSTETTER: Thank you. 19 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: And since they never 20 followed up with you, what would you have liked to 21 have seen coming from them? 22 Like, what would you have liked to have seen 23 coming from them? 24 And is there something that would have been 25 helpful in your case? Like dream scenario. 369 1 MARISSA HOECHSTETTER: Yeah, I mean, I think 2 that the information available online needs to be 3 much more user-friendly, modern, accessible. 4 I think information needs to be transparent. 5 Or, if there's information that can't be 6 shared, at least to say what is and is not 7 available. 8 Simply linking to the relevant law puts a 9 huge, you know, burden on the individual to be able 10 to read and understand that law. 11 It's only in English -- well, I think there 12 are parts of the website that might be in multiple 13 languages, but it's just really not very accessible. 14 So I think the information needs to be more 15 clear. 16 It needs to be shared and pushed out to the 17 public in another way. 18 I think there's bigger questions about why 19 the licensing and disciplining, and all this is 20 spread across these three different, something is 21 department of ed, something is department of health. 22 I mean, those are bigger conversations to 23 have. 24 But, this is not a small endeavor. I mean, 25 there are hundreds of people who do this work in 370 1 these offices. 2 So I feel like that's something to look at, 3 and understand, why does it take almost a year to 4 investigate a case? 5 Especially because I think we have a really 6 unique opportunity; there isn't a statute in coming 7 forward. 8 I mean, medical records could be gone. Yes, 9 there's other things that may go over time. But 10 this is actually, as I understand it, you know, you 11 can come forward and seek some justice. 12 And so I think that's pretty unique, but not 13 something that is promoted or readily visible. 14 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: There were like no 15 signs, nobody telling you, like, hey, this is 16 available to you. Right? 17 MARISSA HOECHSTETTER: No. 18 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: And how would you hope 19 that they are populated? 20 MARISSA HOECHSTETTER: You mean the staff 21 people? 22 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: Well, and the -- well, 23 the boards. 24 I mean, I know that Mr. Gottfried had just 25 talked about it being the Wild, Wild West. 371 1 MARISSA HOECHSTETTER: It's -- as 2 I understand, compared to other states, it's really 3 great, actually, the ratio of public members to -- 4 I mean, you need people with specialized knowledge. 5 I mean, they're also looking at cases of medical 6 harm, right, they're looking all kinds of different 7 kinds of behavior. 8 So you need people who understand the 9 specialties of the different boards, and everything, 10 but having public members is good. 11 I think we need to look at whether or not 12 those public members have connections to the medical 13 industry. They might not be doctors, but they have 14 other connections. 15 And I think that is something that I would 16 question. 17 There's also, I think, almost 100 people. It 18 just seems like a lot. 19 As I understand it, part of that is because 20 you need a certain number of people to look and 21 review each complaint. And so -- and there's a 22 volume. 23 And so there might be good reason for that, 24 but it feels to me like it's a really big endeavor 25 that is not having an impact. And if it is, it's 372 1 not visible. 2 So how can we protect people and respect 3 privacy, but also make their work more visible, so 4 that people see results, see them as a resource, and 5 are willing to come forward. 6 And then we might start to understand the 7 extent of the problem. 8 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: And what would have been 9 some flag that they would could have helped to post 10 up so that you would know that you're not alone? 11 MARISSA HOECHSTETTER: I mean, I think if 12 there was signage in doctors' offices about 13 resources, someone might see that, you know, you 14 might see that. 15 I think that the district attorney -- I mean, 16 I would think if you're reporting to the police and 17 the district attorney, perhaps they should also 18 direct you to that resource. 19 I mean, it's not exactly like a Title 9 20 complaint, but I think of it a little bit the same. 21 Like, you might report to the police, but you might 22 also might report on campus. 23 Right? 24 So I think there -- there's some value to 25 asking law enforcement to also encourage people to 373 1 report, because they might not be able to help you 2 in a criminal way, but this is a way to get this 3 person, you know, away from patients. 4 So they should be promoting that to people 5 who come forward with these complaints. 6 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: Thank you so much. 7 I'm sorry I had to ask so many. 8 MARISSA HOECHSTETTER: That's okay. 9 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: I just wanted to make -- 10 MARISSA HOECHSTETTER: Thank you for asking. 11 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: -- make a -- 12 MARISSA HOECHSTETTER: Very few people want 13 to talk about this stuff, so I appreciate you asking 14 questions. Thank you. 15 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: Well, I appreciate your 16 being brave enough to, you know, open up your story. 17 Thank you so much. 18 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Assemblywoman Simon. 19 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMON: Thank you. 20 And thank you again for your testimony. This 21 is really very powerful. And, it's also a little 22 bit different than -- from some the testimony we've 23 heard before. 24 And I think it raises one of the issues that 25 I have talked about, and that is, our institutions, 374 1 our institutions of higher education in particular, 2 are like cities. 3 They have doc -- they have medical centers. 4 They have law clinics. They do research. They -- 5 you have co-worker problems, faculty and staff and 6 student; faculty-on-student discrimination, 7 employer-employee relationships. You have campus 8 security, so you have that issue of law enforcement. 9 And you have sports, which is another whole scene. 10 And so it strikes me that today's hospital 11 systems are all linked to a university. There are 12 almost no small community hospitals anymore that are 13 not linked to a bigger institution. 14 And I'm curious whether you have a sense 15 that, the size of the institution, the power of the 16 institution itself, played a significant role in the 17 perpetuation of this doctor's actions? 18 MARISSA HOECHSTETTER: Sure. 19 Thank you for that question. 20 Yes, I believe it did. 21 I think the bigger the institution, the 22 easier it is for people to reassign someone, move 23 them around, look the other way, sort of bury it, 24 leadership changes. You know, someone, that history 25 might not be passed on. I mean, uhm... yeah. 375 1 You know, I read recently, I think Columbia 2 has -- their insurance rate has like more than 3 quadrupled in the last few years because of the 4 number of sexual-assault and harassment cases they 5 have, but from faculty and students and staff. 6 You know, it's so big, and each one is in a 7 different area, and no one sort of puts it all 8 together. 9 But at some point you kind of wonder, like, 10 what is your commitment here? 11 And I think, especially with really big 12 institutions -- 13 You know, I work in higher ed, I understand 14 some of endowments and, you know, financing, the 15 donations. I mean, I work in fundraising. 16 -- when you have really big endowments and 17 you can just sort of throw money at problems, and 18 make things go away, make people sign NDAs, yeah, 19 you can get away with more when you're a really big 20 institution. 21 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMON: It also strikes me that 22 we have repeat offenders who are allowed to 23 repeatedly offend. 24 And I'm curious whether, in your experience, 25 and, certainly, talking to the women that you spoke 376 1 to, and there are likely to be other people in the 2 environment, whether it's the nurse or another 3 physician in the practice, who would have a sense 4 that there was something going on that shouldn't be 5 going on, whether there's a need for greater 6 whistle-blower protection? 7 Whether you had looked at that at all in the 8 work that you've been doing, and in the 9 conversations you've been having? 10 MARISSA HOECHSTETTER: So I can't speak too 11 specifically. 12 I will say that part of our complaint, we 13 drafted suggestions for things that the university 14 and the hospital system should do to have anonymous 15 reporting, to have protection for employees who come 16 forward. 17 I mean, you're putting a lot of the 18 responsibility of reporting on the nurses in these 19 situations, or the sort of orderlies, or people, and 20 they're, like, often the lowest on the chain, and 21 you're asking them to come forward. 22 So, again, in this context, it might not be 23 sexual harassment of those people, but I thought it 24 was relevant, in that they were having to work in 25 this environment, and be afraid of reporting 377 1 something that they saw. 2 And so I think there needs to be a way for 3 people to be encouraged to report. I mean, really, 4 you need to explicitly say you have a no-tolerance 5 policy, or, a zero, you know. 6 So the fact that the state board lets 7 77 percent of its people go back -- you know, the 8 physicians go back, like, you're saying "we don't 9 have a zero-tolerance policy." 10 So I think most people in any -- anywhere in 11 the chain are not going to say it's worth it to 12 report, because you're putting yourself at risk. 13 Uhm... yeah. 14 So there needs to be reporting mechanisms 15 that are anonymous. 16 I don't know, really, how it relates, like, 17 if you work at New York Presbyterian, you know, 18 partnership with Columbia, are you reporting to the 19 university? are you reporting to the hospital? 20 I really don't know how that works, and 21 I think maybe that's part of the problem. 22 When you have these big institutions with all 23 these partnerships, it might not be clear where you 24 go. 25 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMON: That's why they hire 378 1 lawyers, to figure that out. 2 MARISSA HOECHSTETTER: Yeah. 3 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMON: Somebody -- 4 MARISSA HOECHSTETTER: Well -- 5 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMON: Somebody can figure it 6 out, and they ought to be figuring it out. 7 And it strikes me that a lot of what happens 8 when they do these deals, is that they don't figure 9 those kinds of things out. 10 And it's clear that there needs to be a 11 better intersection between the various entities, or 12 units, of these large entities, so that people 13 don't -- the institutions -- entities within the 14 institutions are in that cross-purposes, and leaving 15 people to pay the price. 16 MARISSA HOECHSTETTER: Yeah. 17 I mean, Nassar was at a public institution. 18 The gynecologist at USC was in a school, you 19 know, higher ed. 20 There's something to be said about that: why 21 are they able to get away with this in those 22 institutions for so long? 23 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMON: Thank you very much. 24 MARISSA HOECHSTETTER: Thank you. 25 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Thank you. 379 1 MARISSA HOECHSTETTER: Thanks so much. 2 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Just a reminder, it's 3 4:53. 5:30 is the magic hour for security 4 downstairs. 5 SENATOR BIAGGI: Next, we're going to shuffle 6 some of the order. 7 We will be hearing from the National 8 Employment Lawyers' Association, also known as 9 "NELA"; the National Women's Law Center; and 10 A Better Balance. 11 MIRIAM CLARK: I don't know where A Better 12 Balance is. 13 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMON: You could start, 14 whenever you're ready. 15 MIRIAM CLARK: I don't know where A Better 16 Balance is. 17 SENATOR BIAGGI: We're just waiting for 18 A Better Balance. 19 We'll wait a moment. 20 MIRIAM CLARK: I don't know where A Better 21 Balance went, but we're here. 22 SENATOR BIAGGI: That's all right, we can get 23 started. And then, when they come back to the room, 24 that's okay, they can share their testimony. 25 ANDREA JOHNSON: My name is Andrea Johnson, 380 1 and I am senior counsel for state policy at the 2 National Women's Law Center. 3 The law center, we're located in D.C., but we 4 work all across the county, and we've been working 5 for over 45 years to advance and protect women's 6 equality and opportunity, and we've long worked to 7 remove barriers to equal treatment of women in the 8 workplace, including workplace harassment and 9 discrimination. 10 And since January of last year, the National 11 Women's Law Center fund has been housing and 12 administering the Time's Up legal defense fund, 13 which has received over 5,000 requests for 14 assistance just since January of 2018, almost 400 of 15 which are from workers in New York, related to 16 workplace sex discrimination, and the vast majority 17 involve sexual harassment and related retaliation. 18 And over one-third of those requests into the 19 Time's Up legal defense fund from New York have been 20 from workers in the arts and entertainment fields, 21 health care, and education services. 22 And significant numbers of individuals 23 working in local government, food services, finance 24 and insurance, and information and communication, 25 have also sought assistance, and the majority 381 1 identified as low-income. 2 One thing that I really want to underline is 3 that the requests that we've received into the fund 4 confirmed that sexual harassment does not occur in a 5 vacuum, but it often occurs alongside or in 6 combination with other forms of harassment and 7 discrimination, like pay discrimination or pregnancy 8 discrimination. 9 It also occurs at the intersection of 10 identities, like race and sex, or national origin 11 and sex, or disability and sex. 12 A report that the law center published 13 recently, analyzing EEOC charge data, indicates that 14 women of color, and Black women in particular, are 15 disproportionately likely to experience sexual 16 harassment at work, highlighting how race and sexual 17 harassment can be intertwined. 18 I want to underline that because our #MeToo 19 policy response cannot just focus narrowly on sexual 20 harassment. It must be intersectional, it must 21 cover all forms of harassment and discrimination, 22 because legislation that would focus exclusively on 23 sexual harassment would have the odd and impractical 24 result of providing a worker who experiences 25 multiple intersecting violations with only partial 382 1 protection, I think a point that was made earlier 2 today. 3 New York, as you all know, passed a number of 4 really important protections last year, and in years 5 prior, to cover independent contractors and 6 employees of smaller employers, those are really 7 important protections, and, to limit the use of 8 NDAs, but they were all focused on sexual 9 harassment. 10 So we urge the Legislature to extend these 11 protections to all forms of harassment and 12 discrimination, and make sure the same is done of 13 future policy reforms that you're considering, so we 14 can truly address the inequities and harassment in 15 the workplace. 16 And in addition to administering the 17 Time's Up legal defense fund, the law center has 18 also been working with federal and state legislators 19 and advocates all across the country to really 20 harness the energy of the #MeToo movement, to make 21 real change, and stop and prevent sexual harassment, 22 both in legislatures and the general workforce. 23 Last year alone, over 100 bills were 24 introduced in states across the country, and by 25 October 2018, 11 states had enacted some of those 383 1 measures into law. 2 And at the beginning of this year, over 3 300 state legislators, representing 40 states, 4 signed a letter of commitment, pledging to 5 strengthen protections against sexual harassment and 6 violence at work, in schools, in homes, and 7 communities in 20 states by 2020; a call to action, 8 #20Statesby2020, which is very exciting. 9 There's a lot of momentum in the states. 10 And the Congress has also introduced 11 legislation to address the many inadequacies in our 12 federal laws, but little has moved. So it's really 13 fallen to the states to carry the torch of real 14 reform. 15 And New York has enacted several important 16 protections already, but for the state to be a 17 leader in fighting for workplace equality and 18 against harassment, many of these protections need 19 to be strengthened, and additional protections are 20 needed. 21 And I'll just touch quickly on a few that we 22 think are particularly important. 23 One is that, much needs to be done to remove 24 the barriers to survivors accessing justice, like 25 the short statutes of limitations, which we've heard 384 1 about today. 2 Many workers don't come forward immediately, 3 or even within months, to report, either due to fear 4 of retaliation, or as a result of the trauma they're 5 experiencing. And it's just difficult for workers 6 to -- without resources to easily find and consult 7 with advocates or attorneys about their rights. 8 That can take time. 9 We see with the Time's Up legal defense fund, 10 that many people seeking assistance have run out of 11 time and no longer have legal options. 12 Fortunately, we're seeing states, from Texas 13 to Oregon, working to rectify this; working on 14 legislation this session. 15 We saw New York City last year extended the 16 statute of limitations. 17 In April, Maryland extended their statute of 18 limitations for filing an administrative claim to 19 two years. 20 And yesterday, you might have heard, the 21 California Assembly passed a bill that will very 22 likely become law, that will extend their statute of 23 limitations to three years. 24 So, I know you watch what California does, 25 they are moving ahead. 385 1 The comprehensive anti-harassment bill that 2 was recently introduced in Congress, the Be Heard 3 Act, which is something that we worked closely on, 4 it would extend the statute of limitations to 5 four years, and also has provisions dealing with 6 federal government employees who have a much shorter 7 statute of limitations, only 45 days, presently, to 8 initiate a complaint. And it would ensure that they 9 would have the same time as others. 10 So we really urge New York to join this 11 movement to extend the statute of limitations. 12 Another important thing is, addressing the 13 "severe/pervasive" standard, which has become unduly 14 narrow. 15 And my colleagues at the table will speak 16 more to that. 17 We urge the Legislature to pass legislation 18 that rectifies the standard, and really ensures that 19 courts' analysis of workplace harassment focuses on 20 the impact of the conduct, and the individual's 21 terms, conditions, or privileges of employment; that 22 it's based on the record as a whole and the totality 23 of the circumstances, and that recognizes that the 24 wide -- a wide range of circumstances may alter the 25 terms and conditions of employment, and that no 386 1 single type or frequency of conduct is required. 2 New York City, as we've heard, has taken a 3 different standard. 4 California passed legislation last year, also 5 addressing the "severe/pervasive" standard. 6 And the federal Be Heard Act is another bill 7 that has not passed, but has been introduced, that 8 we think provides a model for guiding courts away 9 from the standard -- the "severe/pervasive" 10 standard. 11 And we encourage you to take a look at that. 12 The Faragher-Ellerth defense is something we 13 think is very important, to allowing for punitive 14 damages, which I know will be mentioned. 15 But I'll end by emphasizing the need for 16 measures that increase transparency as a mechanism 17 to really increase employer accountability, and 18 incentivize employers to proactively prevent 19 harassment. 20 So, what we've seen around non-disclosure 21 agreements we think is incredibly important. 22 And we're happy to see that New York is 23 taking some important steps in that regard. 24 We are concerned that, how the law was 25 drafted, leaves it open to -- leaves open to 387 1 employees being still coerced into signing an NDA. 2 So we encourage the Legislature to, for 3 example: 4 Ensure that workers who breech an NDA are not 5 subject to liquidated damages; 6 Ensure that the agreement to keep a 7 settlement confidential provides independent 8 consideration for that agreement; 9 And also ensure that any settlement agreement 10 clearly includes an explanation in it, that an NDA 11 does not prohibit the worker from filing a complaint 12 or participating in an investigation with the state 13 or federal agency, or in federal or state 14 litigation, or using collective action, to address 15 workers' rights violations. 16 Vermont took -- passed legislation last year 17 that takes that approach. 18 So, all these things we think are some 19 additional important procedural protections to try 20 to address this fear that maybe this actually 21 doesn't shift the balance of power necessarily in 22 the negotiation, to try to give more power to the 23 survivor. 24 And there are other transparency measures 25 that we're seeing in other states, such as requiring 388 1 employers to report about the number of claims and 2 settlements, and how claims were resolved, as a 3 mechanism, again, for accountability. 4 And Maryland passed legislation to this 5 effect last year, that would require employers of 6 50 or more employees to report about settlements to 7 the Maryland Civil Rights Commission, which would 8 then aggregate and publish those responses. 9 So, some interesting work going on in other 10 states I'd be happy to talk more about. 11 But we do think that transparency is a really 12 important accountability measure, and would 13 encourage you to look more in that respect. 14 Thank you. 15 MIRIAM CLARK: I'm Miriam Clark. I'm the 16 president of the New York affiliate of the National 17 Employment Lawyers' Association. 18 I've been representing employees in New York 19 for more than 30 years. 20 And so it's striking that we're hearing so 21 much at the last hearing, and today, and in the 22 press, this outcry against workplace sexual 23 harassment. It's wonderful to hear. 24 I've been doing this work for a very long 25 time, and I have to say that, when I first started 389 1 out as a lawyer, I thought that, eventually, I would 2 be out of a job because sexual harassment would end. 3 Who knew? 4 But the point is, that we can't change 5 culture without changing the law. 6 Outrage without meaningful legislation is 7 just this year's noise. 8 So what we need to do is comprehensively 9 change the substance of New York State's 10 discrimination law. 11 And I know you're all familiar with S3817, 12 A7083, which is our omnibus bill that we believe 13 will do just that. 14 So, just to start something that I haven't 15 said before, but I also read the quote in Politico 16 from the business council, and, you know, I do think 17 there's a legitimate concern about what the effect 18 of these laws might be on businesses, especially 19 small businesses. 20 Large institutions like Columbia must be held 21 accountable, but, I think we do have a concern about 22 small businesses that make New York vibrant. 23 But I think what we need to think about is 24 that harassment and discrimination are bad for 25 business. 390 1 Employees who are harassed and discriminated 2 against suffer physical and psychological illness, 3 which lowers their productivity and increases their 4 absenteeism. 5 Studies show that women of color report the 6 highest level of discrimination in the workplace, 7 and are most likely to suffer symptoms of 8 posttraumatic stress disorder as a result of such 9 experiences. 10 And these -- there are articles that talk 11 about, really, sexual harassment as an occupational 12 health issue, in my printed testimony. 13 Employees who suffer from unlawful 14 discrimination, harassment, quit if they can afford 15 to. 16 A workplace rife with unlawful harassment 17 will suffer turnover, which experts estimate costs 18 employers anywhere from 20 to 213 percent of 19 salaries. 20 So, you have turnover of one highly-paid 21 professional person, you're gonna spend 213 percent 22 of their salary replacing them. 23 Overall, it is estimated that each person on 24 a team affected by sexual harassment is less 25 productive -- 391 1 That makes sense because you're distracted or 2 afraid by what's happening to your co-workers. 3 Right? 4 -- with an average cost through loss 5 productivity of $22,000 per person. 6 Common sense, and my experience, tells us 7 that this must be the case. 8 My clients who suffer from sexual, racial, 9 and other forms of harassment dread going to work 10 every day. They suffer from physical and 11 psychological symptoms. They're exhausted by the 12 emotional and physical energy involved in trying to 13 get away from their harassers, and, of course, by 14 terror of retaliation if they complain. 15 Those with the ability to leave their jobs 16 almost always do. 17 So who stays? The harasser, free to make the 18 life of the next employee totally miserable. 19 So I'll walk through S3817 in a minute, but 20 first I want to discuss the specific weaknesses of 21 current New York law. 22 So, overall, New York's anti-discrimination 23 law is more than 75 years old. 24 Yay for us for being one of the first, but 25 not yay for us because it needs to be amended. 392 1 The worst thing right now is that New York 2 courts have deliberately and explicitly chosen to 3 align it with federal law. 4 Every single case you bring under the State 5 Human Rights Law, the first thing the judge says is, 6 "We follow Title 7." That's the federal law. 7 So federal law has gotten significantly less 8 employee-friendly over the years. I can tell you 9 about that. It's become harder to prove age 10 discrimination, harder to prove disability 11 discrimination, harder to prove retaliation. 12 The "severe or pervasive" standard has gotten 13 crazier and crazier, and this is all just likely to 14 become worse, since we know what's happening to the 15 federal bench and the Supreme Court. 16 Okay, so, moreover, there's this procedural 17 mechanism called "summary judgment," which, for 18 people who didn't go to law school, means that, 19 after discovery, but before trial, a judge looks at 20 all the evidence and decides whether there's enough 21 of a factual issue to go to trial. 22 So less than one-third of employment 23 discrimination cases ever get to trial. The rest 24 get knocked out on summary judgment. 25 And the cases that are most likely to survive 393 1 are pure sexual-harassment cases, but even they get 2 to juries less than half the time. 3 So what you have are these judges deciding, 4 without ever looking at the witnesses, without ever 5 looking at the employee, which cases are deserving 6 enough to go to a jury. 7 So why is it that so few of these cases get 8 to trial? 9 And the answer is, of course, the substance 10 of New York law. 11 So as we all know, discriminatory harassment 12 is only illegal if a Court believes that it was 13 severe or pervasive. 14 By the way, it's "or" -- severe or 15 pervasive -- but many judges think it's "and." 16 I gave some graphic examples of outrageous 17 conduct about "severe/pervasive" when I testified in 18 February. 19 Here's some more. 20 Neil (ph.) in New York did an Amicus brief 21 three years ago, in a case called Kaplan versus 22 The City of New York. 23 There was a claim under the state law and the 24 city law. 25 The claim was, that a supervisor masturbated 394 1 through his clothes while sitting next to an 2 employee. 3 And the lower-court judge held that not only 4 was that not severe or pervasive, it was actually a 5 petty slight or trivial inconvenience under the 6 New York City law. 7 But see, interestingly, on appeal, the 8 Appellate Court said, no, you do absolutely have a 9 different standard under City law. 10 The employer did not prove that this was a 11 petty slight or trivial inconvenience, and the 12 employee's case was allowed to go to trial. 13 So this is an absolutely clear example of how 14 the City law, which our bill tracks, allowed a case 15 to get to trial that New York State law would not 16 have. 17 Here's another one. 18 In a 2018 case involving a Black woman -- 19 this is a case -- one of Laurie's cases, a Court 20 held that being called "a bitch" and "a Black bitch" 21 numerous times, along with comments such as, "This 22 bitch thinks she's the shit," and, "You Black people 23 think you are the shit," did not constitute severe 24 or pervasive harassment. 2018. 25 Also last year, the Second Circuit Court of 395 1 Appeals affirmed a lower court who held that the 2 following conduct suffered by an African-American 3 public school teacher in Westchester -- this was 4 Rye -- was not severe or pervasive. 5 Plaintiff's colleague forwarded a derogatory 6 e-mail, comparing a minority teenager to a 7 downwardly evolved human, "homo slackass-erectus." 8 "This species receives benefits," the cartoon 9 said, "and full government care. Unfortunately, 10 most are highly fertile." 11 Another teacher referred to African-Americans 12 as "Alabama porch monkeys." 13 Another teacher complained she didn't want 14 another "Hernandez" in her class. 15 The same teacher told plaintiff in front of 16 his class that it was her right as an American to 17 use the n-word. 18 And a baseball coach told an African-American 19 student that he ran as fast as a runaway slave. 20 Not severe or pervasive. 21 We've talked about -- a little bit about the 22 accountability of institutions. 23 New York employers escape liability because 24 they're often held to be not responsible for the 25 hostile work environments created by their low-level 396 1 and mid-level supervisors. The only exception is 2 the rare situation where the employee can prove that 3 the employer encouraged, condoned, or expressly or 4 impliedly approved the supervisor's conduct. 5 That's really hard to do. 6 It is very hard for an employee to ever prove 7 that, somehow, the employer acquiesced or approved 8 what the supervisor was doing. 9 And most New York State courts follow the 10 federal example, which gets the employer completely 11 off the hook if the employee failed to promptly use 12 a reasonable avenue of complaint provided by the 13 employer. 14 So we talked about this in February. 15 If the employee calls the wrong 800 number, 16 calls too late, calls too early, complains about the 17 wrong thing, then, under the Faragher-Ellerth 18 defense, the employer is off the hook. 19 And, of course, all available research shows 20 that most employees who suffer from unlawful, 21 hostile work environments don't complain, usually 22 because they have a quite justifiable fear of 23 retaliation. 24 So, in some ways, New York law tracks federal 25 law, as I just described. In some ways it's worse. 397 1 So New York does not provide for punitive 2 damages, which means that awards, especially to 3 low-wage workers, tend to be low and absorbable by 4 the employer as a cost of doing business. 5 Damages in New York State cases are only 6 measured by the worker's economic loss, which could 7 be low if it's a low-wage worker, and emotional 8 distress, which is highly variable. 9 If an employee can't afford psychotherapy, 10 for example, her damages are considered to be 11 "garden variety," and limited to five figures or 12 lower. 13 The employer, therefore, paying very little 14 money, is incentivized to continue to employ the 15 harasser and allow the harassment to continue as a 16 cost of doing business. 17 Under New York law, an employee who wins a 18 case can have the employer pay legal fees only if 19 the case was based on sex discrimination. 20 And small employers are allowed to commit all 21 forms of discrimination, except for discrimination. 22 Employers are only responsible for the acts 23 of independent contractors if the unlawful conduct 24 was based on sex discrimination. 25 As we will describe later, these anomalies 398 1 allow many forms of discrimination, especially 2 discrimination against women of color, to go 3 completely unchecked. 4 Again, all of this outrage without 5 legislation is meaningless. Fundamental changes 6 need to be made in the substantive law. 7 So 3817 and 7083A, introduced by 8 Senator Biaggi and Assemblymember Simotas, has now 9 been supported by many co-sponsors, including many 10 of you in this room -- thank you -- and more than 11 30 organizations, including the New York City Bar 12 Association, the National Employment Lawyers' 13 Project, Legal Aid Society, Make the Road, New York 14 Legal Momentum, the Chinese Staff and Workers 15 Association, Latino Justice, and others. 16 It would eliminate the "severe or pervasive" 17 standard explicitly, and replace it with an 18 employer's ability to prove that what happened was a 19 petty slight or trivial inconvenience. 20 This comes right out of New York City law. 21 And as we heard from Dana Sussman, New York 22 City law works. 23 Our bill holds employers absolutely liable 24 for discriminatory and harassing acts of their 25 supervisors, and allows employees, who prove that 399 1 they have been unlawfully discriminated against or 2 harassed, to obtain punitive damages and have their 3 attorney fees paid by the employer. 4 It also protects all employees of small 5 employers, and it protects independent contractors. 6 So the #MeToo movement, and even some of the 7 press coverage that I see of these hearings, might 8 have reasonably led people to believe that, really, 9 what we need to do right now is just strengthen the 10 law against sexual harassment. 11 Given the press coverage, this assumption 12 might be understandable, but it's dead-wrong, as my 13 colleague Laurie Morrison will explain. 14 LAURIE MORRISON: Thank you, Miriam. 15 Hi, I am Laurie Morrison, employee advocate. 16 I have been representing victims of 17 employment harassment, discrimination, and 18 retaliation for almost 20 years. 19 And I'm also a member of the National 20 Employment Lawyers' Association, both the national 21 and the New York affiliate. 22 As Miriam described, the proposed bill, 23 S3817, seeks to include important, critical 24 provisions that are desperately needed in New York 25 State law. 400 1 But I want to specifically talk about how it 2 wants to eliminate the "severe or pervasive" 3 analysis. 4 Why do we need to eliminate it? 5 Well, because it's a barrier; it's a barrier 6 that says, if you're harassed in the workplace, you 7 have to prove the harassment, but you also have to 8 prove that the harassment you suffered is 9 sufficiently egregious to warrant recognition and to 10 warrant protection. 11 Okay, so we're telling people who are brave 12 enough to come forward, these are survivors, these 13 are thrivers, these are people who need to be 14 applauded for coming forward -- 15 It is terrifying to be alone in a workplace, 16 to be harassed, to not be able to -- these people 17 don't necessarily have trust funds. Okay? They 18 need to work. 19 -- and we're telling them, if you are brave 20 enough to come forward and complain so it stops 21 happening to you, and, hopefully, it will help it 22 stop happening to others, well, you need to prove 23 your harassment, and you need to make sure that 24 you're worthy of legal protection. 25 That's not okay, and it has never been okay. 401 1 And what "severe or pervasive" also does, is 2 it further reduces protection of people who have 3 suffered intersectional harassment. 4 We've talked about it today. Right? 5 So "intersectional harassment" are people who 6 have been -- who have suffered and been targeted 7 because of more than one characteristic. 8 They're a Black woman. 9 They're a White male who is disabled, who 10 might be called, "You're not man enough," just 11 'cause he's disabled. 12 Well, that's his disability and his gender 13 being attacked. Okay? 14 We have so many different examples of this. 15 We have transgender people who are struggling 16 from this, because people are saying, Oh, well, 17 which is this? 18 Okay, we don't have a way yet, or at least it 19 hasn't been exercised yet, to deal with 20 intersectional harassment. 21 So then you add on to it "severe or 22 pervasive," according to studies, half of all people 23 who bring intersectional harassment claims have no 24 protection under the law, just because they happen 25 to be a Black woman who was called a "Black bitch" 402 1 at work. 2 We have too many people who are not getting 3 covered under the current New York State law, and 4 "severe or pervasive" is paving the way for them to 5 continue to not have that kind of protection. 6 Let me give you the example of the case that 7 I've been working on. 8 This is a Black woman, repeatedly called 9 "bitch," "Black bitch," "These Black people think 10 they're the shit," and other egregious slurs in the 11 workplace. 12 Now, it was very clear that this woman was 13 being targeted specifically because of her race and 14 her gender simultaneously. 15 Now, how do we know that? 16 Well, because White women were not ever 17 called "bitch." 18 White and -- White women and White men were 19 referred to by their proper names, not by their 20 race. 21 So we have a clear signal that race and 22 gender were at -- were at the center focal point 23 here. 24 But, the intersectional nature of this 25 woman's abuse, the "Black bitch," and otherwise, was 403 1 completely overlooked. 2 So the "Black" was segregated from "the 3 bitch." 4 And then doing so minimized the severity and 5 effect of the abuse this woman suffered. 6 So "severe or pervasive" analysis was applied 7 to the "Black" portion in isolation, and then to the 8 "bitch" portion in isolation. 9 And then it was found that just "bitch," in 10 and of itself, or just "Black," in and of itself, is 11 not sufficiently severe or pervasive to warrant 12 protection under the current New York State law. 13 It gets worse. 14 The person who made these slurs was a woman, 15 but she wasn't an African-American woman. So the 16 "bitch" portion of the slurs were completely 17 disregarded. They were considered just "intragender 18 sparring"; one woman calling another woman 19 "a bitch," no big deal. 20 Then they took the "Black" portion, 21 segregated that as well, and they said, well, just 22 "Black" alone, I'm sure this person was just trying 23 to describe skin color. 24 They completely -- this is what occurred in 25 reality. 404 1 I know, Senator Biaggi, I see your face. 2 I know, it's the same disgust, and I deal 3 with it every single day with my clients, 4 unfortunately. 5 That's why we have to change these laws. 6 So, when we do not understand, or do not 7 respect or appreciate, the intersectionality, we are 8 all more than just gender, race; we are so many 9 things. We are gender and race and disability and 10 sexual orientation. 11 There are so many ways that we can be 12 targeted for harassment. 13 And if we don't look at those ways and 14 respect those ways, we're not going to protect 15 people who are victims. 16 But if we keep "severe or pervasive," it's 17 going to get even worse. 18 And it still is worse, just like I've just 19 described. 20 So, intersectionality research, 21 intersectionality experts, such as Leah Warner and 22 others, have provided research to show, that not 23 only are intersectional claims only half as likely 24 to win, they are the least likely of all to get any 25 protection under our current laws. 405 1 They've also found, intersectional 2 researchers, that women of color are most at risk 3 for mistreatment. 4 Well, our laws inform our behaviors, so we're 5 not surprised at that, are we? 6 They're least protected, so they're the ones 7 that you want to target. 8 If we overlook the fundamental aspects of 9 harassment, such as the intersectional nature of 10 abuse, then we help the harassers achieve their 11 goal, because we reduce protection for a large 12 portion of our population. 13 And this negatively affects all of us. 14 Like I said, there could be a gay woman in 15 the workplace who's targeted because she's a gay 16 woman, but a heterosexual man might be treated 17 differently, a gay man might be treated differently. 18 A disabled man might be called "less than a 19 man" in the workplace. It's because he's a disabled 20 man, not one or the other. 21 So we cannot have a law that takes who we are 22 and segregates them, and then puts an artificial, 23 "severe or pervasive" analysis on top of that. 24 And by the way, the "severe or pervasive" 25 analysis is being determined and judged by someone 406 1 who wasn't there. They didn't see what happened. 2 So let's go ahead and distort what happened, 3 and then let's have a third party be blind to the 4 intersectionality and impose an artificial standard 5 that has not worked, and won't work. 6 Now, Assemblyman Crespo, earlier, when you 7 were speaking with the HID, thank you, you asked, 8 have they heard, "Well, this harasser just got away 9 with it?" 10 Let me answer the question for you. 11 I have heard that daily. 12 I have heard it from my clients. 13 And, unfortunately, I have seen it in person, 14 with these people being brave enough to come 15 forward. 16 And because someone imposed a "severe or 17 pervasive" barrier on them, the "Black bitch," all 18 these other horrible words, not severe or pervasive. 19 Do you think the harasser got away with it? 20 Absolutely, and it happens time and time 21 again. 22 Now, I want to add as well, that some people 23 are concerned that if we remove "severe or 24 pervasive," well, people will just be able to claim 25 harassment, and that's it, and employers will go 407 1 down, and small employers especially, we have to be 2 careful. 3 Well, to be clear, again, without "severe or 4 pervasive," you still have to prove harassment, and 5 it's not an easy thing to do. 6 So you still have to prove your case. 7 And, employers, they have no interest, at 8 least I hope, to having a workplace that's divided 9 on these severe or pervasive, non-intersectional, 10 artificial grounds. 11 No one wants a workplace where the workers 12 are divided amongst each other, and before 13 themselves. 14 And as we've said and as we've seen, people 15 of color, intersectional people, they are suffering, 16 we are all suffering, severe PTSD, because when we 17 finally do stand forward and are brave enough to 18 complain, our law takes a blind eye and says, You're 19 not protected, you're not good enough. Who you are 20 is who we don't want to see. 21 We cannot allow this to happen in our law. 22 We cannot allow our workers to not be 23 protected. 24 Let them focus on doing a good job; not on 25 having to avoid harassment because the law is not 408 1 helping them. 2 Thank you. 3 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: First of all, thank you 4 for your patience and for your testimony. 5 A couple of questions. 6 The -- have you handled cases regarding 7 violations or not following last year's 8 implementation of the new policies? 9 MIRIAM CLARK: Not yet. 10 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Have you seen specific 11 cases? 12 MIRIAM CLARK: Last year's policies, 13 I haven't yet. 14 LAURIE MORRISON: Not yet. 15 MIRIAM CLARK: Although, I have had cases 16 where the additional affirmation, that the plaintiff 17 wanted the NDA, came into play. 18 That's the only interface I've had so far 19 with the new policies. 20 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Okay. 21 And in Aravella's bill, 7083, you mentioned, 22 if we get rid of the "severe or pervasive" standard, 23 and we apply, instead, the petty slight or 24 inconvenience, that would -- explain one more time, 25 just, layman's terms, what difference does that 409 1 make? 2 So -- so the victim wouldn't have to prove 3 that the incident was severe or pervasive; instead 4 the employer would have to prove that what occurred 5 amounts to a petty slight or inconvenience. 6 MIRIAM CLARK: Right. So back -- 7 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: So it puts the pressure 8 off the -- 9 MIRIAM CLARK: -- backing for one minute, 10 though -- 11 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: -- yep. 12 MIRIAM CLARK: -- as Laurie said, and this is 13 important, sexual harassment is illegal because it 14 changes the terms and conditions of the person's 15 work environment because of gender. 16 Let's talk about gender. 17 So the employee still has to prove that there 18 was harassment, that it was because of gender or 19 gender and race, or whatever protected class, and 20 that the terms and conditions of her environment 21 were changed as a result; that something happened, 22 and that it happened to her because she was a woman. 23 Under the "severe or pervasive" standard, she 24 would then have to prove that what happened was 25 severe or pervasive, using this line of increasingly 410 1 restrictive cases, sort of like what I described. 2 Under the New York City law, and under our 3 law, the employer -- the burden of proof would shift 4 to the employer to say, Wait a minute, that was 5 trivial, that was petty. 6 And so that's why, in the Kaplan case, 7 involving the supervisor, the employer was not able 8 to prove on -- that, on papers, this kind of conduct 9 was petty slight or trivial inconvenience. And 10 that's why the case did not get dismissed. 11 LAURIE MORRISON: Yeah, the "petty slight and 12 inconvenience" is the defense. 13 MIRIAM CLARK: Right. 14 LAURIE MORRISON: So first the -- right, so, 15 first, the employee has to -- squarely has to prove 16 the burden, the employee was harassed. 17 MIRIAM CLARK: Because of her membership in a 18 protected class. 19 LAURIE MORRISON: Exactly. Or in the 20 membership in several protected classes. 21 MIRIAM CLARK: Right. 22 So we're not talking about, you know, 23 generalized workplace bullying, even though we would 24 like to be. 25 We're really talking about conduct because of 411 1 membership in one or more protected classes that 2 changes the terms and conditions of employment. 3 That's Employment Law 101. 4 But instead of the burden on the employee, 5 the burden shifts to the employer to prove that it's 6 petty slight or a trivial inconvenience. 7 LAURIE MORRISON: Exactly. 8 Once the employee proves harassment occurred, 9 then the employer -- the burden shifts to the 10 employer to say, Okay, maybe it occurred, but it was 11 a just a petty slight or inconvenience. 12 And if the employer cannot prove that it was 13 just a petty slight and inconvenience, you win -- 14 MIRIAM CLARK: So, yeah -- 15 LAURIE MORRISON: -- basically. You get 16 protected. 17 MIRIAM CLARK: -- or in Kaplan, you get past 18 a motion to dismissed. 19 LAURIE MORRISON: Correct. 20 MIRIAM CLARK: Most of these -- this issues 21 come up way before a person ever gets to a jury. 22 They come up in either motions to dismiss, 23 which is a motion that the employer makes right 24 after you file the complaint; no discovery, no 25 nothing. 412 1 That's what happened in Kaplan. 2 On the complaint, the employee described the 3 masturbation in all of its glory. And the employer 4 made a motion to dismiss the case (snaps fingers) up 5 front, saying that what was written in that 6 complaint was not severe or pervasive. 7 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: We also have this 8 underlying concern that expanding protections to all 9 employees, and to more classes of employees, is 10 going to hurt business. 11 And the first question, I guess the moral 12 question, we have to ask ourselves is, what is more 13 valuable: the rights and protections of every 14 individual to be free of harassment, or the 15 potential financial interest of an entity, 16 corporation, or business owner or individual? 17 I would think that would be an easy answer. 18 I asked a question to the City earlier, if 19 they're expanded -- or, their approach to these 20 protections had hurt business? 21 And while there wasn't a specific issue, 22 I just want you to reiterate the message, and you 23 pointed it out in your testimony: There is 24 tremendous cost to businesses because of the issues 25 arising from harassment in the workplace; whether 413 1 it's the productivity impacts, whether it's the 2 physical and/or emotional distress on an employee, 3 whether it's that employee now requiring additional 4 services that are expensive to the employer to 5 provide, because of the ramifications of all of 6 these things. 7 So, in your experience, again, looking at 8 other jurisdictions, like the city of New York, 9 would you say it is a highly exaggerated notion, 10 that expanding these protections will end up costing 11 businesses more than, say, the improvement to 12 productivity and morale, and workforce in general, 13 of having a high standard of protection? 14 MIRIAM CLARK: I would say it goes even 15 further than that. 16 It's wrong thinking to think that this is 17 going to have a negative impact economically on 18 employers in the long run. 19 In the long run, a workforce where there's 20 sexual harassment, racial harassment, is a divided, 21 unproductive, physically- and psychologically-ill 22 workforce with a high turnover. 23 And I can tell you, my clients, who are still 24 employed, come to me, they're having such a hard 25 time concentrating. 414 1 You know, I have a woman right now who works 2 in a big bakery upstate. And, you know, there's 3 derogatory terms written at her workstation. And 4 every time she sees it, she goes into the bathroom 5 and she cries, and she debates about whether she'd 6 reported it, even though it doesn't really help. 7 And, you know, she's not herself for the rest 8 of the day. 9 That's -- she could be a great worker, but 10 she's being horribly, painfully distracted, and you 11 know she's not the only one. 12 LAURIE MORRISON: If I may add dollars and 13 cents to this as well, how this is going to affect 14 or potentially harm business depends on how we're 15 going to define "business." Right? 16 So if we're going to go ahead and have a law 17 that says, anything other than severe or pervasive, 18 you can go ahead and harass people, are we actually 19 doing business, or are we just fostering harassment 20 in the workplace? 21 Are we're just giving a space where we say, 22 Harassers, go ahead, have at it? 23 Okay? 24 But also in terms of, money, just dollars and 25 cents, it is so much more expensive to try to say, 415 1 Oh, well, no, this is not severe or pervasive. 2 And fighting this, because employers are 3 trying to now get away with, because there's this 4 whole fear of, I don't want to be caught, versus, 5 make the law make sense and make the law be clear, 6 so that it becomes less expensive, far less 7 expensive, for an employer to say, Supervisor, you 8 did that, you're out. 9 Okay? 10 That doesn't cost much. 11 What costs a lot of money is when they're 12 trying to hide how severe or pervasive it is. 13 When you're trying to get -- work within that 14 law and that huge gray area called the "severe or 15 pervasive analysis," it is so confusing, no one 16 knows what's protected and what's not protected. 17 That, is what costs businesses money. 18 MIRIAM CLARK: Just an obvious point is that 19 New York law, for sexual harassment only, already 20 covers all employers. It's an anomaly in the law 21 that, sexual harassment, by itself, is somehow 22 privileged over other forms of harassment, which is 23 something that has to be changed for all the reasons 24 that Laurie said. 25 And, frankly, it's hard to understand how 416 1 it's moral, ethical, or constitutional to, you know, 2 privilege one form of harassment over another. 3 LAURIE MORRISON: Yeah, what kind of message 4 is that sending, privileging one kind of harasser 5 over the other. 6 MIRIAM CLARK: Right. 7 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Well, listen, just, last 8 comment. 9 I appreciate your leadership, your voices, 10 your ability to help us come up with a draft of good 11 legislation. 12 I think there are really good bills out there 13 that need to be seriously considered, that, 14 hopefully, we can move forward with in the very near 15 future. 16 And to what has been stated over and over 17 again throughout all presentations: We need 18 results. We need to take action. We need to expand 19 those protections. We need to create real 20 accountability, and real liability, for violations 21 of these protections. 22 And for you to highlight that 23 intersectionality of all of these issues. 24 Somebody, you know, in our community, the 25 Latino community, we've it seen in our immigrant 417 1 community, and, you're right, there's always this -- 2 it's difficult to outline exactly where or what is 3 the thing that is causing people to treat me 4 differently. 5 Some of us have been accustomed to just 6 accepting that that's the way it is and/or that, 7 because of who we are, maybe there's just more to 8 talk about. 9 And it's something we have to kind of, even 10 ourselves, get out of. 11 I'm a legislator, I get a chance to sit here 12 and ask these questions, and talk about this, and 13 maybe shape some of this policy. 14 But, I've got to tell you, even me, I feel it 15 every day. 16 I don't -- I often go into a room feeling 17 like I shouldn't even be in that room to begin with. 18 I have to work that extra hard to feel like I fit 19 in; let alone, how I'm talked to or treated, I often 20 overlook, or ignore, because I don't measure myself 21 in the same. 22 And that's something that, as a community, 23 many of us have to grow out of. 24 And, yet, as a male, I have advantages that 25 others don't, and my daughters may not have. 418 1 And so, again, I just want to thank you for 2 your leadership, and for fighting. 3 And I hope that all these years of advocacy 4 will finally see some real light of day as this 5 committee leads into its legislative work. 6 MIRIAM CLARK: Thank you. 7 LAURIE MORRISON: May I say, you're saying 8 that you've become accustomed to it. 9 I think you've had to adapt to it. 10 And that's, unfortunately, what a lot of us 11 have had to do. 12 When the law doesn't protect you, and you 13 still have to work, you have to adapt to it, but you 14 still feel it every day. Right? 15 MIRIAM CLARK: And until the point where you 16 can't adapt. 17 LAURIE MORRISON: Exactly. 18 Exactly. 19 SENATOR BIAGGI: No, I just -- I mean, I just 20 wanted to thank you for your testimony, and for 21 being on the record with those examples, because 22 I think it's incredibly important for those 23 individuals who don't really understand the behavior 24 that doesn't reach the "severe or pervasive" 25 standard. 419 1 This is probably where so much of the 2 confusion lies. 3 You know, we have about 13 days left of 4 session, I believe, which means that we're going to 5 work incredibly hard to prioritize these bills. 6 And so I think my only question that I have 7 for all three of you, because you know that we will 8 be met with resistance: 9 For those individuals, whether they're 10 colleagues, although I can't imagine that that would 11 be the case, especially after today, who wouldn't 12 want this; but, more importantly, for any type of 13 advocacy organization or special interest that would 14 lobby against us doing this now, or have, probably, 15 the strongest argument against doing this now, what 16 would be your best argument, other than what we've 17 already heard, right, of how it is bad for business? 18 The fact that the business council came out 19 with that disappointing statement today, was, 20 I mean, not -- it wasn't surprising. 21 But I'm sure that we'll hear more of that as 22 the weeks go on. 23 So -- I mean, in just the last moments 24 I guess that we have together, if you have any 25 advice for myself and Assemblywoman Simotas for some 420 1 of the arguments that you think will be made that we 2 haven't foreseen yet? 3 Because I find that, even if you think you're 4 on the right side of things, there's always some -- 5 like today, there's always some instance where 6 something surprises you, and then you're not 7 necessarily prepared. 8 And if you are not prepared also to answer 9 this question, you know, that's all right. You know 10 where to find us. 11 MIRIAM CLARK: I mean, we've give an lot of 12 thought to this, obviously. 13 So, we've talked about the cost of harassment 14 in the workplace. Right? 15 We've talked about New York City economy 16 thriving. 17 And I think it's also true, although 18 I haven't researched it, although I could, that 19 every time that the law has moved toward greater 20 protection of workers, the same exact argument is 21 being made: That this is going to be bad for 22 business. 23 My bet is, that you could go back and look at 24 reactions of these people all the way back to 25 Title 7 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, or maybe 421 1 even 1945, and find these same arguments. 2 There's a real fear. 3 But I think that Assemblymember Crespo hit it 4 on the head: At a certain point, you have to think 5 about all of the employers, all of the employees, 6 and their need to earn a livelihood, with dignity 7 and with respect, and their ability to be 8 productive, and they're wanting to be productive, 9 and measure that against an inchoate, unmeasurable, 10 and probably not real threat to somebody's profit. 11 Right? 12 And it's one thing to think about it in the 13 context of a very small employer, like, your 14 mother-in-law's barbershop. 15 But, I mean, when you think about the 16 employer as, say, Columbia University, it's really 17 hard to imagine that getting rid of the "severe or 18 pervasive" standard, getting rid of 19 Farragher-Ellerith, is going to bankrupt Columbia. 20 ANDREA JOHNSON: That's right. 21 (Indiscernible cross-talking) -- 22 LAURIE MORRISON: (Indiscernible 23 cross-talking) -- please. 24 ANDREA JOHNSON: -- so I'll just add, 25 I always find this question challenging because it's 422 1 kind of, like, what's the business argument for 2 human rights? 3 Like, it's human rights, and we shouldn't be 4 kind of making this into dollars and cents. 5 But, I also am a pragmatic person and 6 understand how it works. 7 SENATOR BIAGGI: Of course. 8 ANDREA JOHNSON: And so -- I mean, yeah, I'll 9 just reiterate, the productivity and health impacts 10 for employees are significant. That leads to 11 turnover, which is costly for employers, and that's 12 definitely, yeah, a piece of it. 13 And I think -- I think we're in a moment 14 where -- and it's not just moment -- it's a movement 15 that is continuing strong, the #MeToo movement. 16 It's impacting a generation, where folks are 17 realizing that we -- it's not -- we can't just do 18 business as usual before. You can't just have a 19 policy on the books about, you know, don't harass, 20 here's the law, comply with it, check the box, and 21 be done. 22 Like, that is not acceptable. 23 And we want to make sure that's not 24 acceptable per the law, but I think also, 25 culturally, it's becoming less and less acceptable. 423 1 And so employers need to change regardless, 2 but we need the law to make sure that that is true 3 across the board. 4 And -- I mean, it's -- liability is a cost. 5 And, already, I think employers are -- 6 employees much more aware of their rights and feel 7 much more empowered in this moment to speak up. 8 And that is an amazing aspect of the #MeToo 9 movement. 10 And so that is a business-case argument to 11 have -- you know, you need to be doing the right 12 thing. 13 And the law is trying to push employers to 14 have practices, and change structures, so that the 15 right thing is done from the beginning so that you 16 prevent harassment and you don't end up with 17 lawsuits in the end. 18 So -- and I think, you know, recruiting 19 talent kind of thing, I mean, New York has an 20 interest in recruiting talent. 21 And I think to your point about mentioning 22 California, you know, you want to be seen as a 23 leader in this space, and businesses need to be 24 there as well. 25 And so you need to be creating business 424 1 environments that are safe and dignified, and that 2 that's where people want to work. 3 I mean, everybody wants to work, obviously, 4 but I think that's especially, acutely, people are 5 aware now. 6 LAURIE MORRISON: And if I may add, the 7 New York City law already doesn't have "severe or 8 pervasive" or Faragher-Ellerth. 9 So if they say suddenly making the New York 10 State law comport with New York City law is going to 11 cause such costs, well, really? 12 That's like saying the water is going to be 13 wetter. 14 It just doesn't really -- it doesn't work. 15 [Laughter.] 16 LAURIE MORRISON: Okay? 17 But on top of it, you know, people fear 18 change. 19 OFF-CAMERA SPEAKER: Yep. 20 LAURIE MORRISON: So I think a lot of times 21 what they're talking about is, you need something, 22 something's going to change? 23 Then, okay, but that same change has created 24 a stronger workforce. 25 Employers were terrified back in the '50s and 425 1 '60s about, you know, giving women and minority -- 2 and racial minorities the ability to vote. 3 Well, we're a lot wealthier now because of 4 it, as a nation. 5 So your business, I don't care who you are, 6 small or large, is only as good as the strength of 7 your workforce. 8 So let's keep our workforce strong and make 9 our laws protect them. 10 SENATOR BIAGGI: That's right. 11 Thank you so much. 12 I could not agree with you more. 13 I think the question was more so about the 14 individuals surrounding us who are fear -- who are 15 afraid of the disruption that we are potentially 16 causing their status quo. 17 But this was incredibly helpful. 18 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: I -- we have -- I have a 19 couple of more colleagues to present, but I just 20 want to take a second, first of all, thank everybody 21 who's still in the room with us and going strong. 22 As you know, we've reiterated a number of 23 times, we went on for 11 1/2 hours the last time. 24 I think we're going to beat that record 25 today. 426 1 But, I'm only saying that because I just want 2 to remind everybody, we purposely did not apply the 3 clock to this conversation -- we didn't do it in 4 February, we didn't do it today -- because we 5 understand, and didn't want to rush a discussion, 6 and we wanted to give everybody ample time to really 7 discuss in-depth. 8 But I think we -- it's incumbent upon all of 9 us to also then try to be as succinct and 10 respectable of that time as possible. 11 So, we have three more -- four more members, 12 questions for this panel, but we will ask the 13 student group -- 14 OFF-CAMERA SPEAKER: I thought we were done. 15 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: No, no. 16 -- the student group that's here, we will ask 17 them to come up next, so that -- I appreciate that 18 you have been this patient, and with everybody in 19 the room patient enough, with us. 20 So Assemblywoman Simotas. 21 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMOTAS: Thank you. 22 I think what your testimony has highlighted 23 is that the reforms that were passed last year were 24 not enough. 25 Just training people on an insufficient, 427 1 ineffective standard is not going to change our 2 system. 3 So that is why your testimony today is so 4 very important, to establish why we need to get rid 5 of the "severe or pervasive" standard. 6 Now, I'm going to get into my geeky lawyer 7 self and ask a question that may be asked of myself 8 and Senator Biaggi when we debate this bill. 9 With respect to any precedent with respect to 10 New York City law, now, clearly, the standard that 11 the City applies has been around since 2009. 12 Since then, has there been any case law that 13 you would find did not track the correct standard? 14 We hear that there's -- as you testified, 15 there's a host of federal and state decisions that 16 are applying the state law that can, you know, make 17 your skin crawl. 18 But are there any examples with respect to 19 courts applying the City law? 20 MIRIAM CLARK: Well, Kaplan, I hate to keep 21 talking about this quite disgusting case, but, 22 that's what happened with a lower court in Kaplan. 23 The lower court in Kaplan tried to apply the 24 same State law standard to the City law claim, and 25 got reversed. 428 1 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMOTAS: On appeal. 2 MIRIAM CLARK: On appeal. 3 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMOTAS: So there's no other 4 district court other than that one case? 5 MIRIAM CLARK: There's probably others. 6 I mean, we know of the ones where the two 7 were clearly delineated in that way, but there might 8 be some bad City law cases out there, I'm sure there 9 are. 10 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMOTAS: May I ask, Miriam, as 11 we're going through the process, if you can provide 12 the Senator and myself (indiscernible 13 cross-talking) -- 14 MIRIAM CLARK: Do you want some City cases 15 under the City law where the court applied the wrong 16 standard? 17 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMOTAS: No. 18 MIRIAM CLARK: No. 19 Go ahead. 20 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMOTAS: What I want, if they 21 misinterpreted the standard, or if -- you know, if 22 it needs to be clarified. 23 I just want to make sure what we're doing now 24 is going to be right. 25 LAURIE MORRISON: It's going to stick. 429 1 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMOTAS: Exactly. 2 MIRIAM CLARK: Sure. 3 I mean, there -- especially in the early 4 days, there were definitely decisions where the 5 courts kept veering off towards "severe or 6 pervasive," and had to be veered back in. 7 So, sure, we can get you those. 8 LAURIE MORRISON: I mean -- and I'd like to 9 say, that's why we call it the "practice" of law, 10 right, because we're really never going to make it 11 perfect. 12 But I think, to your point, the City law is 13 really -- we have a good law here. We have it -- 14 you know, we can always make improvements, but we 15 have some clear guidelines here that can help. 16 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMOTAS: And we can always 17 amend our sponsors' memo, we can always do things to 18 put things in the administrative record, that if 19 there's ever a question, and there's actually a good 20 law or a law clerk doing the research, they can look 21 into the legislative history of the bill to 22 understand what our intention is. 23 MIRIAM CLARK: Perfect. 24 LAURIE MORRISON: And the City law, by the 25 way, I cite, and I'm sure all of our colleagues, 430 1 Miriam cites as well, the intention behind the City 2 law we cite it all the time, to make it -- and thank 3 you for that -- because it makes it clear "severe or 4 pervasive" is not appropriate. 5 MIRIAM CLARK: Remedial -- 6 LAURIE MORRISON: Any type of 7 discrimination -- 8 MIRIAM CLARK: -- right. 9 Remedial purpose of the law. Don't construe 10 the same as. Should be a floor and not a ceiling. 11 All of that language. 12 Some of we put it -- we put some of that into 13 3817, but all of that language helps courts 14 understand that they're not looking at, you know, 15 another version of Title 7. 16 LAURIE MORRISON: Right. 17 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMOTAS: Thank you. 18 LAURIE MORRISON: Thank you. 19 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Assemblywoman Simon. 20 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMON: Technology, you know, 21 you can't live with it, can't live without it. 22 So, I'm going to ask you a question that 23 I know you know the answer to. 24 And, last night, when some of us were having 25 a brief -- was it last night, or the night before, 431 1 I don't remember -- where there was a briefing on 2 this bill. 3 And I remember this case as being somewhere 4 in the Midwest, and it was a school case, and I was 5 wrong. 6 It was actually Upstate New York, and it was 7 a school bus driver, who pleaded guilty to raping a 8 14-year-old. He had applied her with gifts and 9 alcohol, and raped her, and -- a 26-year-old man. 10 And the Court did not give him any jail time. 11 MIRIAM CLARK: Yep. 12 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMON: And said, in explaining 13 the sentence, the judge said that "he had no prior 14 arrests, and that only one victim had to be 15 involved." 16 So, in other words, one rape is okay. 17 And this notion of "severe and pervasive" is 18 really about, it's okay to discriminate or to harass 19 or to rape or to assault a couple of times, right. 20 And, you know, sociologists, and people who 21 do research, and also law professors do research. 22 And I had asked about, you know, "how many 23 pass is enough" kind of thing. 24 And you were talking about the "noose" 25 article, and I don't know if there are other 432 1 articles out there. 2 But I'm curious, if you could address that 3 issue on the record? 4 MIRIAM CLARK: Sure. 5 So the "severe or pervasive" standard leads 6 to discussion about what exactly is "pervasive." 7 Right? 8 So it says "or." 9 So then if something only happened once, is 10 it "severe"? 11 So, again, it's a federal standard. 12 And what I said on Tuesday night was, there's 13 actually a split in the circuit. 14 So the federal courts have the lower courts, 15 which are the district courts, and then the circuit 16 courts, and then the Supreme Court. 17 There are nine circuit courts. 18 There's is a split in the federal circuits 19 about whether one "noose" is sufficiently severe to 20 meet the standard. 21 The 9th Circuit recently held that one noose 22 is not severe. 23 So there's actually -- as I said, I found a 24 "Law Review" article that essentially says, you 25 know, is one noose enough? 433 1 There's still some debate, although I think 2 it's recently been resolved, about whether one use 3 of the n-word is severe. 4 Certainly, under the cases that I described 5 at the last hearing, it was perfectly clear that 6 having your -- one time your bra strap gets pulled, 7 one time you get squeezed; one touching is 8 absolutely not severe. 9 For a while there was a split in the circuits 10 about whether one rape was severe, although I think 11 that may have come down in the employee's favor 12 since then. 13 So, hard to believe. 14 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMON: Clearly this guy. 15 MIRIAM CLARK: Right, right. 16 Well, that was a criminal case. Right? 17 We're talking about the workplace. 18 So -- right, the -- and so then you get 19 equally idiotic results about, what's "pervasive"? 20 Right? 21 What does "pervasive" mean? 22 It pervades the workplace. 23 So that's, like, you know, Laurie's case. 24 Well, if it happened 5 times in 10 years, 25 that's once every 2 years, that's not really 434 1 pervasive, the courts have found. 2 I think I have one of those in my testimony 3 about -- on the "pervasive" piece of this idiocy. 4 Right? 5 So -- yeah, here you go. 6 I was describing to you the case about the 7 school teacher in Westchester. Right? 8 It cited a case from New York, "Seven 9 racially-insensitive comments over three years, 10 including one instance of using the n-word, were not 11 pervasive." 12 So, yeah, this is what happens with the 13 "severe or pervasive" standard. 14 And I want to say that there's a lot of 15 federal case law, that when the courts feel like 16 citing it, talks about, you're not supposed to take 17 things in isolation. You're supposed to, you know, 18 look at the totality of the circumstances. 19 And when a particular judge feels like doing 20 an overall analysis, he or she will do one. 21 But especially New York State court judges, 22 when they have really high caseloads, they're not 23 accustomed to writing long opinions. What they tend 24 to do is just, boom (snaps fingers), say, "We follow 25 Title 7," and then apply their gut as to whether, 435 1 you know, one noose is enough, or whatever. 2 So it was a very thoughtful and calculated 3 decision on our part to specifically eliminate the 4 "severe or pervasive" language in this legislation, 5 and then to incorporate the New York City 6 affirmative defense of petty slights and trivial 7 inconvenience. 8 LAURIE MORRISON: I think it's important to 9 add, as well, on top of that, the "severe or 10 pervasive" analysis keeps changing. 11 When it first started, it's like -- it's like 12 trying to nail jello to a wall. 13 When it first started, it was clear, fairly, 14 that one use of the n-word was enough. That's 15 severe or pervasive. 16 MIRIAM CLARK: And it was. 17 LAURIE MORRISON: Now, you can use the n-word 18 and the b-word a lot, "b" being either Black or 19 bitch, whichever one it's applying to, and, you 20 know, you have to actually count -- 21 MIRIAM CLARK: How many times. 22 LAURIE MORRISON: -- yeah. 23 So you're caught -- and I can't tell you how 24 many times I've had to do this, and not -- when we 25 talk about it right now, it feels frustrating to 436 1 have to explain it to a client. It's demeaning. 2 Okay? 3 Well, you were called the n-word five times, 4 and you were called the "bitch" word six times, and 5 the "Black bitch" word seven times. 6 So -- but there was a case where it was -- 7 you -- you're -- you're -- you're two less than 8 another case. 9 It is -- what are we sending to our workers? 10 But also what the "severe or pervasive" 11 problem is doing now, is we're having these numbers. 12 Now, who in the world in the workplace, if 13 they're hearing in n-word a lot, is going, okay, 14 that's seven, that's eight, that's nine, I better 15 write those down. 16 I actually had some people ask me: 17 Okay, well, you're able to describe -- 18 through the client in a deposition: 19 You're able to describe exactly what 20 happened; that it happened repeatedly during this 21 period of time by this person. And you were there 22 and they were there, and you're able to describe all 23 of that. 24 But can you tell us the exact date and time 25 that this occurred? 437 1 MIRIAM CLARK: And we need to know that. 2 LAURIE MORRISON: Well, that must not be 3 severe or pervasive, then, because you must be 4 lying, because you have to prove the exact number of 5 times that you heard the n-word or the b-word. 6 MIRIAM CLARK: Because if it was only once, 7 it's not pervasive. 8 LAURIE MORRISON: Well, yeah. 9 And if it was seven, but not ten. Right? 10 So that's -- so -- I mean, it -- it -- we're 11 falling down a rabbit hole of -- of -- of 12 ridiculousness, that "severe or pervasive" begs. 13 So we need to get rid of this. This is 14 not -- yeah. 15 This is reality of what's happening every day 16 because of these analyses. 17 That's why we have to get rid of them. 18 SENATOR BIAGGI: Thank you. 19 I just also want to comment on that. 20 Do you think that's also because the state 21 courts are applying the federal standard which is 22 the "and" versus the "or"? 23 LAURIE MORRISON: No, they're both -- they're 24 both "or." 25 MIRIAM CLARK: They're both "or." 438 1 SENATOR BIAGGI: I thought that the federal 2 was the "and." 3 LAURIE MORRISON: No. 4 MIRIAM CLARK: No. 5 LAURIE MORRISON: They're both "severe or." 6 SENATOR BIAGGI: So where does the "and" come 7 from? 8 LAURIE MORRISON: Well, it's because -- 9 MIRIAM CLARK: Courts screw it up. 10 LAURIE MORRISON: -- exactly. 11 MIRIAM CLARK: People screw it up. 12 It's "or." 13 LAURIE MORRISON: but I want to be clear, 14 the cases that I'm talking about, where my client 15 has to figure out how many times it's happened -- 16 Which is, who does that? 17 SENATOR BIAGGI: Crazy, crazy. 18 LAURIE MORRISON: -- these are federal court 19 cases. 20 MIRIAM CLARK: But they're applying the state 21 law. Right. 22 LAURIE MORRISON: Yes, they're applying the 23 state law, and they're applying it just like the 24 Title 7. 25 MIRIAM CLARK: Right, right. 439 1 And state courts do the same thing, only less 2 verbosely, usually. 3 SENATOR BIAGGI: That's -- that's crazy. 4 LAURIE MORRISON: And we're seeing this 5 happen in depositions, and everything, where, you 6 know, well, they have to prove severe or pervasive, 7 so let me go ahead and make sure this victim can 8 give you a number. 9 And, it doesn't work. 10 SENATOR BIAGGI: So I just want to be, like, 11 clear on the record: So the state courts in New 12 York are applying the wrong standard on occasion? 13 MIRIAM CLARK: No -- well, I have to correct 14 that. 15 I mean, I think -- I have seen cases where a 16 judge mistakenly writes "severe and" instead of 17 "severe or," not only in New York, but in federal 18 cases as well. 19 But everyone understands that the standard 20 really is "or." 21 And as we described, the "or" standard is 22 problematic enough. 23 LAURIE MORRISON: And not for nothing, 24 I think when there -- like, a lot of times when 25 they're using "severe and pervasive," it's a 440 1 Freudian slip -- 2 MIRIAM CLARK: Right. 3 I mean, everybody -- 4 LAURIE MORRISON: -- because they're 5 basically applying a much higher standard that needs 6 to happen -- 7 MIRIAM CLARK: Everybody -- 8 LAURIE MORRISON: -- which is "severe or 9 pervasive." 10 MIRIAM CLARK: -- everybody understands that 11 it's "or." 12 Right, everyone does understand that. 13 SENATOR BIAGGI: Okay, thank you for 14 clarifying that. 15 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: (Indiscernible.) 16 SENATOR BIAGGI: Yes. 17 Assemblymember Gottfried. 18 ASSEMBLYMAN GOTTFRIED: A couple of things. 19 One, if it hasn't happened yet, I'm sure, at 20 some point, some judge is going to say, you've got 21 such a detailed explanation with dates and times, 22 you must have made it up. 23 LAURIE MORRISON: Or you must have been 24 preparing for litigation. 25 ASSEMBLYMAN GOTTFRIED: Yeah. 441 1 LAURIE MORRISON: It's a catch-22. 2 ASSEMBLYMAN GOTTFRIED: Yeah. 3 MIRIAM CLARK: Right. 4 LAURIE MORRISON: You better name the dates; 5 otherwise, we don't believe you. 6 And if you do name the dates -- 7 MIRIAM CLARK: You must be preparing for 8 litigation. 9 LAURIE MORRISON: -- we don't believe you 10 because you must have been trying to prepare for 11 litigation. 12 Right? 13 MIRIAM CLARK: Right. 14 ASSEMBLYMAN GOTTFRIED: Right. 15 And the other thought is that, nobody would 16 apply this standard to petty larceny. 17 I mean, if you were accused of only two or 18 three times grabbing a $20 bill from her purse while 19 she was away from her desk, nobody would say, Oh, 20 it's only two or three times. 21 And if the thief said, Well, if she had 22 complained, I would have given it back. 23 [Laughter.] 24 ASSEMBLYMAN GOTTFRIED: Nobody would say, Oh, 25 okay, case dismissed. 442 1 The main thing I wanted to say is, I just 2 want to thank all of you, and I'm sure there are 3 others who have contributed to this process, and, 4 certainly, the working group is a key part of this. 5 You've helped put together, really, an 6 extraordinary package. 7 And at least as important as putting it 8 together, is what you've done to explain it to us in 9 really great detail, legally, and in terms of the 10 practicalities. 11 And I think the work that all of you have 12 been doing on this, I hope we are going to be able 13 to take advantage of the new political alignment in 14 the Legislature to make some really extraordinary 15 changes in the law. 16 And, if and when we are able to achieve that, 17 you and your colleagues are really going to be the 18 ones who made it happen. 19 So, thank you. 20 MIRIAM CLARK: Thank you very much. 21 LAURIE MORRISON: Thank you. 22 ANDREA JOHNSON: Thank you. 23 MIRIAM CLARK: You can do a lot in the next, 24 however, 13 days. 25 LAURIE MORRISON: And I just have to say 443 1 thank you, to Miriam, who -- and people who work 2 with her, so much, to be able to help create this 3 law, and the intersectionality scholars who have 4 really contributed so much. 5 You know -- 6 MIRIAM CLARK: It was a group effort. 7 LAURIE MORRISON: -- well, yeah. 8 MIRIAM CLARK: But we do think that 3817 is 9 one's best, most efficient shot at getting -- of 10 getting this right. 11 And we're really grateful to have the City 12 law as a model. 13 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Are you done? 14 SENATOR BIAGGI: Yes. 15 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Oh, okay. 16 SENATOR BIAGGI: Assemblymember Quart. 17 ASSEMBLYMAN QUART: Thank you. 18 And thank you for your presentation. 19 I just wanted to pick up on something 20 Ms. Morrison and Ms. Clark talked about, about the 21 practice of law. 22 And, especially, something stuck with me, 23 Ms. Clark, about summary judgment, in your 24 testimony, because, in so many areas of the law, in 25 civil practice, the results are just the opposite. 444 1 The tribal issue of fact goes to the moving 2 party more often than not, except in this area. 3 And I suspect that has a lot to do with the 4 exceedingly high and faulty standard, as well as the 5 affirmative defense that lets employers walk away 6 from their employee's conduct. 7 But I wanted to explore with you, and -- if 8 there are other areas that act as obstacles to 9 parties bringing forth their complaints in a 10 successful way through the court system? 11 And I don't know the answer to this, but 12 I would -- Article 16 is very broad, rules of 13 discovery and disclosure. 14 I don't practice in this area, but I wanted 15 to know, from your perspective, are there any 16 changes in civil practice, or best practices, that 17 other states follow, that we could duplicate or 18 replicate in civil practice, that may require 19 statutory reform? 20 We did so in criminal law this year. 21 Are there any changes in this particular area 22 that you see that would take away some of the 23 obstacles to an aggrieved party getting justice in 24 this area? 25 MIRIAM CLARK: What a great question. 445 1 LAURIE MORRISON: Yeah, it is. 2 MIRIAM CLARK: You know, I think I'd like to 3 get back to you on that. 4 There are things that come to mind, but, 5 because it's sort of a CPLR question, I think I want 6 to think about it. 7 ASSEMBLYMAN QUART: Yeah. 8 MIRIAM CLARK: I can tell you that the 9 mandatory mediation for employment-discrimination 10 cases in the Southern District is a successful 11 program, that I think I would encourage the State to 12 implement. 13 Also, in the Southern District, at least, 14 there is a pro se office that helps pro se 15 plaintiffs. 16 There's not that kind of help for a pro se 17 plaintiff in State Supreme Court, at least not in 18 New York County. 19 And I do think that that would be something 20 else that would be beneficial. 21 Finally, in my personal experience, many 22 New York State court judges don't understand the 23 law. 24 They don't understand the election of 25 remedies that we talked about; 446 1 They don't understand that the statute of 2 limitations is tolled while you're at the state 3 division; 4 They don't -- it's a very complicated 5 mechanism. 6 And, you know, sometimes we've had to go up 7 to the Appellate Division, just to have them clarify 8 something basis that a lower court -- basic that a 9 lower-court judge got wrong. 10 So I think better training for trial-level 11 judges about the substance of the New York State law 12 and its procedural mechanism would be enormous. 13 And then I'd like to get back to you, when 14 I talk to -- 15 ASSEMBLYMAN QUART: And that your answer -- 16 oh, I'm sorry. Go ahead. 17 LAURIE MORRISON: And I'd actually also like 18 to add, some type of enforcement with respect to 19 acknowledging and -- and -- and -- and staying pure 20 to the summary-judgment standard. 21 MIRIAM CLARK: Oh, yes. 22 LAURIE MORRISON: Because there are way, way 23 too many cases, I think it was 65 percent, or 24 something, of employment cases, nationally, don't 25 quote me on that, but, a high, high majority of 447 1 summary judgment -- of employment cases, 2 discrimination, harassment, and retaliation, are out 3 on summary judgment. 4 Now -- but there are very interesting issues 5 with that. 6 It also depends on the race, the 7 intersectionality, what we're arguing, and, 8 actually, even the decision-maker who's making the 9 decision to dismiss the case. 10 The race of that decision-maker affects the 11 number, where, it could be 65 to 75 percent, but if 12 the race of the decision-maker is a person of color, 13 I think it goes down to about 35, 45 percent. 14 MIRIAM CLARK: So having a diverse judiciary 15 is incredibly important. 16 LAURIE MORRISON: Very, very important. 17 MIRIAM CLARK: So we have to -- 18 ASSEMBLYMAN QUART: Yeah, that actually, that 19 comment, leads into my second question about other 20 obstacles that may exist, and that's the court 21 system. 22 In other areas where we want to incentivize 23 some sort of policy goal, either through legislation 24 or OCA, we do certain things. 25 We have specialized parts for medical 448 1 malpractice, or asbestos. If you're 70 years old, 2 you receive a trial preference. 3 We do all sorts of things, whether through, 4 I won't call -- we set forth our policy preferences 5 in our court system because we want a more fair 6 system towards some aggrieved party. 7 It's my understanding we do not do that in 8 this area. 9 So my question is: Are there obstacles we 10 can remove, or things we can do, within the court 11 system, within the -- that we can request of the 12 chief judge or OCA, that will take away another 13 obstacle towards someone who's likely been harassed, 14 being able to set forth their proofs in a court of 15 law? 16 MIRIAM CLARK: Can I take that back to Neil 17 in New York and get back to you? 18 ASSEMBLYMAN QUART: Sure. 19 MIRIAM CLARK: I mean, I said the ones that 20 sort of came to the top of my head, but I'm betting 21 that there are more. 22 ASSEMBLYMAN QUART: Sure. 23 LAURIE MORRISON: Yeah, and there are a lot 24 of -- this is a conversation that can be ongoing, 25 and I think should be ongoing. 449 1 And thank you so much for the question. 2 I have to also say, when judges are making 3 these decisions, they could be well meaning, right, 4 but employment discrimination, harassment, is -- 5 it's a very personal, visual thing. 6 So when you're looking at a piece of paper 7 and you're seeing a bunch of, you know, "Black" or, 8 this, or - or -- or "gay," or whatever it is, it's 9 very difficult to really see -- you're not seeing 10 the person. 11 So when I stand in front of someone and I'm 12 talking -- I just did this the other day, where 13 I was talking in front of the judges, and I said, My 14 client, she's mocha-colored like me, and she's a 15 Black woman. 16 And I tell you -- and I told them 17 specifically, I'm telling you that so you can look 18 at the face of what this happened when I tell you 19 what she was told. 20 And you could see that that made such a 21 difference. 22 But when you're just looking at a piece of 23 paper with some names, and you've got a thousand 24 other cases to deal with, employment discrimination 25 is, just, it's uncomfortable, it's a lot of work, 450 1 and -- and it's -- and it really lends itself to, 2 sometimes, them wanting to get rid of it, even if 3 they're good and well meaning. 4 I think some way to maybe also get the 5 victims in front of their faces while they're 6 describing it, or while they're having to make these 7 decisions, might also help. 8 ASSEMBLYMAN QUART: I think, to your point, 9 in -- both in this area and criminal law, diversity 10 on the bench -- 11 LAURIE MORRISON: Oh, huge. 12 ASSEMBLYMAN QUART: -- is so critical. 13 You've tried cases, you talked to jurors, you 14 tell them, "use your own common sense, use your own 15 experience." That recommendation is not separate 16 and distinct from a judge. 17 And if there's not diversity, you hope they 18 can sort of get out of themselves and see it through 19 another person's lens. 20 But if you have both diversity and excellence 21 amongst your judges, then I think you're farther 22 along in achieving that. 23 LAURIE MORRISON: And it's also diversity of 24 thought and ideology as well. Yeah. 25 MIRIAM CLARK: Another barrier, I just want 451 1 to say this is obvious, but a barrier, altogether, 2 are mandatory arbitration clauses. 3 And legislation that would ban -- that would 4 bar the State from contracting with any employer who 5 had a mandatory arbitration clause, we talked about 6 this, that would elim -- you know, in practice, 7 eliminate an enormous barrier. 8 Many, many of my clients now are walking in 9 with, you know, mandatory arbitration clauses they 10 had no idea was buried in the handbook somewhere. 11 ANDREA JOHNSON: And I'd like to just add 12 that, you know, so much of the harassment happening 13 in the workplace, I mean, the rates are really 14 severe in the low-wage workforce, and a lot of folks 15 there will not be even going to court at any point. 16 So thinking about what resources are 17 available for them. 18 And I mentioned the Be Heard Act before, 19 which I think is a model that states can look at. 20 It is a very lengthy bill, but it has all the things 21 in it, comprehensive solutions, related to 22 harassment. 23 And there are -- part of the Be Heard is to 24 provide funding to states to -- for independent, 25 private, non-profit entities that can really work -- 452 1 advocate for workers' rights. 2 And, both, maybe that is through the court, 3 but maybe not, other mechanisms like that. 4 So looking at what funding is available, and 5 what support can be given to non-profits in the 6 communities, to represent workers, especially those 7 that -- for -- of a wide variety of reasons might 8 never access court system. 9 ASSEMBLYMAN QUART: And I only asked the 10 questions because we need to pass Senator Biaggi and 11 Assemblymember Simotas's bill. 12 And -- but when we do that, and we cut a 13 ribbon, we should not -- there is much more work to 14 be done. 15 MIRIAM CLARK: There certainly is. 16 We were looking at sort of the bedrock, 17 because it felt like, without changing the heart of 18 the substance of law, that things around the edges 19 could never change. 20 But, absolutely, I mean, the "attorney's 21 fees" provision, by the way, will go a long way 22 toward making cases practical for low-wage people, 23 which now we only have, for some reason, in sex 24 cases. 25 ASSEMBLYMAN QUART: Thank you. 453 1 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Assemblywoman Niou. 2 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: Everybody asked so many 3 questions, I am so sorry. 4 But -- 5 MIRIAM CLARK: It's fine. We like to talk 6 about our bill. 7 LAURIE MORRISON: We actually love this 8 stuff. 9 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: I really -- no, I really 10 appreciate you guys, and I really appreciate the -- 11 the issues on intersectionality that you bring up. 12 I guess, you know, with somebody who, you 13 know, has a lot that's happening here, all of this, 14 but I just -- I wanted to ask, especially about the 15 transgender community, and the things that we can do 16 to protect them. 17 So just this year, the legislative -- this 18 legislative session, we are -- we passed GENDA, 19 which is the first time, after 16 years of 20 Assemblymember Gottfried reintroducing the bill, and 21 reintroducing the bill, and reintroducing the bill, 22 that it has passed in our Legislature. 23 And -- and I just -- I feel like, you know, 24 in our transgender community, not only are we -- did 25 we not even have them as a protected class, but, 454 1 instead, we hyper-policed them. There's like a ton 2 of stuff that is wrong with how we treat folks, 3 including, you know, just people walking around, 4 transgendered, get stopped by the police, and get 5 picked up, and get arrested for prostitution, just 6 for walking. Just for walking. 7 And so -- I mean, I just -- I feel like these 8 are different things that -- that -- you know, that 9 are so pervasive and systemic within our laws, 10 within our system. 11 Do you guys have any suggestions on how we 12 can fix our system, systemically, within how -- you 13 know, with what we've gotten now, knowing that there 14 is a system that is so incredibly discriminatory 15 towards our community, that -- is there something 16 that we can do? 17 MIRIAM CLARK: That's a hard one. 18 I don't know that I've thought about it 19 specifically with regard to the transgender 20 community, but I have thought about this over the 21 years with regard to other forms of people in 22 protected classes, that our society is really 23 atomized, so that I know that in the, you know, 24 White working-class neighborhood where I grew up, 25 nobody knew a person of color. 455 1 And I think that there are still 2 neighborhoods in New York that are like that. 3 And, so, housing in New York is terribly 4 segregated, just like it was in my childhood. 5 So, people go to work, and that might be the 6 only place where they have to interact with somebody 7 who looks different from them. 8 And so, the workplace, more than the 9 neighborhood school, and more than the neighborhood 10 itself, the workplace becomes the sort of laboratory 11 where people learn how to deal with each other. 12 And so to the extent that we can have 13 workplace laws that encourage not only 14 non-discrimination, but also respect, then I think 15 we are educating people to go back into their lives 16 and deal with their children, and deal with people 17 that they see on the street, in a somewhat different 18 way. 19 So, again, I don't know how much that applies 20 to the transgender world, but I kind of think it 21 does. 22 For somebody who doesn't know any transgender 23 people personally, their first encounter must be at 24 work, so let it be a respectful, regulated, 25 predictable encounter. 456 1 LAURIE MORRISON: I actually have a trans -- 2 a client -- a trans client currently, and she's -- 3 God, she's so brave and so fantastic. 4 And what she's going through, just having to 5 deal with this case, all of the abuse. 6 I mean, people don't realize, they think, oh, 7 they're just going to -- you know, you're just going 8 to bring a case because they're trying to make 9 money. 10 No, no, no, no, no, no one brings these cases 11 just to make money. This is so heartbreaking and so 12 terrible to have to tell what's happened to you over 13 and over and over again. It's just awful. 14 So I would say that the first -- just like 15 Miriam was saying, the world is full of 16 discrimination and harassment. It has always been. 17 I -- I -- unfortunately, I think it -- I hope 18 it won't always will be, but, it seems that way. 19 So we need to enact laws that say, when 20 you're in the workplace, behave. 21 Not, you know, oh, this isn't sufficiently 22 severe or pervasive, or, you didn't complain to the 23 right person, even though it was the right person, 24 you complained to HR. But somehow, now, when you 25 bring a lawsuit, well, that's not good enough. 457 1 Stop giving all these wonderful hiding 2 places, and let's protect these people. 3 I'd say the second thing to do for trans 4 people is, when they complain, believe them. You 5 know, just like if -- just like if a woman 6 complains, and she's being sexually harassed, and 7 raped, believe her. And when a man complains, 8 believe him. 9 It's just, you know -- and when a Black man 10 or -- I mean, all of this, let's have respect for 11 each other in the workplace. 12 And I think one of the best ways to do that 13 is allowing our laws to inform our workplace and 14 say, no, no, severe or pervasive, uh-uh, because 15 that's saying, you don't have to respect them, you 16 can get away with it. 17 Make the law respect these people. 18 Make the law say, I might not understand what 19 you're going through, but it's not my right to make 20 you feel like less than human because of what and 21 who you are. 22 I think that's the first way to do it. 23 ANDREA JOHNSON: And, also, we need to make 24 sure that they're at the table in these policy 25 solutions. 458 1 And to that point, actually, I'm eager to 2 hear from Girls for Gender Equity, which I know is 3 doing a lot of work with transgender and non-binary 4 students. 5 And so much of that work needs to happen in 6 schools. You know, that's where a lot of this 7 systemic work can take place, and making sure that 8 our schools are inclusive and a safe place for 9 transgender students, and that students are learning 10 behaviors that are -- you know, good behaviors, that 11 can go into the workplace, about dignity and 12 respect. 13 And I think that's incredibly important. 14 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: Yeah, I just wanted to 15 again, you know, addressing the intersectionality of 16 it, you know, we see that a transgender person, even 17 if they're White, or if they are a person of color, 18 there's differences in how people are treated. 19 LAURIE MORRISON: Oh, absolutely. 20 MIRIAM CLARK: Absolutely. 21 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: If there's something 22 that happens to somebody who is a transgender 23 person, who -- it's -- they -- they -- there's 24 mistreatment in getting health care. There's 25 mistreatment in being able to go to school safely. 459 1 There's mistreatment in just walking on the street. 2 There's mistreatment in our government system. 3 And, so, with the systemic -- with the 4 systemic discrimination that we just now, this year, 5 finally passed GENDA, and finally classified 6 trans folks as a protected-class, but our laws have 7 not caught up. 8 And so when we're talking about the 9 workplace, when we're talking about, you know, 10 schools, when we're talking about our hospitals, 11 because the law has not caught up, you know, there's 12 going to be loopholes, and -- and -- and cracks that 13 people can fall through. 14 So how do we make up for that within the laws 15 that we are writing now? 16 LAURIE MORRISON: Other than what we've 17 already described? 18 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: Yeah. 19 LAURIE MORRISON: I think we should -- if we 20 can get back to you on that as well? 21 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: That would be great, 22 that would great. 23 MIRIAM CLARK: Yeah, I mean, we've drafted 24 this to, obviously, treat transgender people as a 25 protected class, like any other, but, special 460 1 protection that might be needed because they're so 2 newly protected, and because what they go through -- 3 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: Right, that -- that's 4 what -- 5 MIRIAM CLARK: -- is so extreme -- 6 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: -- exactly the wording. 7 Sorry. 8 MIRIAM CLARK: -- right. 9 No, that's fine. 10 So -- yeah, so, that, and the question about 11 state court procedure, we'll get back to you on. 12 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: Thank you. 13 MIRIAM CLARK: We need to circle with our 14 members, I think. 15 LAURIE MORRISON: And I think it's really 16 important also to listen to the trans community. 17 I mean, a lot of times we spend so much time 18 talking, and we have well meaning, we want to make 19 things right. But maybe we need to spend more time 20 listening, and maybe we can get the answers that we 21 need as well. 22 ANDREA JOHNSON: Yeah, and understand the 23 unique challenges faced in the workplace, and the 24 fact that there is, you know, likely, a much higher 25 fear of reporting, and what that means in terms of 461 1 accessing some of these solutions that we are 2 crafting. 3 Like, as I was kind of saying before, will 4 they even get to the point of going to court and 5 being able to use some of these standards? 6 Obviously, the standards impact the workplace 7 outside of the court, and everything. 8 But, just kind of recognizing the challenges, 9 in terms of fear of reporting and retaliation, and 10 how severe those are, and what that means in terms 11 of (indiscernible cross-talking) -- 12 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: I mean, if you can be 13 deemed a criminal, just to walk down the street, 14 then, you know, people are going to, of course, 15 wonder. 16 But, anyways. 17 LAURIE MORRISON: Can I just add one thing, 18 that I don't know if we've actually mentioned, and 19 I'll be quick? 20 When we're talking about costs to business, 21 and what we're going to do with trans and any other 22 group, it seems to me that, when there have been 23 people who have been harassed in the workplace, and 24 they complained, and the employer rectified it, 25 there were no lawsuits. 462 1 MIRIAM CLARK: Right. 2 LAURIE MORRISON: Okay? 3 MIRIAM CLARK: The employer can always 4 rectify the problem. They very seldom do. 5 Because of Faragher-Ellerth, the complaint 6 mechanism in the workplace is set up to just defend 7 the employer. 8 So it's really rare for the internal 9 complaint to lead to getting any kind of redress, 10 especially getting the person fired. 11 But if their complaint mechanisms worked, 12 there would be no lawsuits. 13 LAURIE MORRISON: Right. 14 So I think that's back to the question, also, 15 when you speak to the business community and they 16 say, Well, this is going -- you know, this is really 17 going to make us pay a lot of money on this, well, 18 let them know, if you behave properly in the 19 workplace, and you don't allow this to occur, then 20 you're not going to have a cost at all. 21 So don't change the law to make it easier to 22 harass; stop the harassment, if you really want to 23 save money. 24 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Thank you. 25 LAURIE MORRISON: Seems simple. 463 1 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Thank you very much. 2 LAURIE MORRISON: Thank you. 3 MIRIAM CLARK: Thank you. 4 ANDREA JOHNSON: Thank you. 5 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: And now we have Ashley, 6 Kylynn, Neillah, Rose, Zoraida, Stacey, Marie, from 7 Girls for Gender Equity. 8 I hope I have the names right. 9 NEILLAH PETIT FRERE: Ready? 10 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Yep, you can begin. 11 NEILLAH PETIT FRERE: Good afternoon, 12 everyone. 13 My name is Neilla Petit Frere, and I am 14 16 years old. I am a junior at the Brooklyn School 15 for Music and Theater in Brooklyn, where I also 16 live. 17 I am a cisgender Black girl, and I am 18 passionate about speaking out and having my voice 19 heard, and taking steps to empower our future. 20 I am a member of the Young Woman's Advisory 21 Council at Girls for Gender Equity, who I am also 22 here representing today. 23 In Girls for Gender Equity, young people are 24 engaged in the work of enacting institutional 25 change, and we work in the foreign policy, develop 464 1 as racial and gender experts, and also receive 2 social and mental-health support. 3 I would also like to thank everyone who came 4 here today to support and hear our testimony against 5 sexual harassment in young people's workplace. 6 I will be speaking on sexual harassment 7 occurring in school. 8 In my school, school safety agents sometimes 9 make comments on the bodies of female students, and 10 make attempts to flirt with students as well. 11 If a girl is walking by, school safety agents 12 will look at her in a very inappropriate and sexual 13 way. 14 I have witnessed moments where students in my 15 school were harassed, and that led them to feeling 16 uncomfortable and unsafe. 17 When I feel unsafe in my school, I tend to 18 focus less on my work, and it creates an environment 19 where I'm taught that what I'm wearing is more 20 important than what I'm learning. 21 Schools are microcosms of society. 22 The same way that adults experience sexual 23 harassment at work are the same ways that young 24 people are experiencing sexual harassment in schools 25 by people who are in power. 465 1 These experiences leave me to question what 2 I wear, fear of being a target, and forces me to 3 believe that what happens to me -- what can happen 4 to me is my fault, because I should be able to 5 control that man's reaction to what I'm wearing. 6 Stories like these are -- so many more -- are 7 so many reasons why I'm here today, calling for the 8 New York State Legislature to support the state 9 expansions of Title 9, and to pass the Safer 10 New York Act. 11 Title 9 and Title 9 coordinators are 12 important to me because, in the workplace of young 13 people, we are vulnerable without them, and they are 14 supposed to keep us safe. 15 There are police officers in my school who 16 are abusing their power and are subjecting students 17 to sexual harassment and violence. 18 In particular, your support of full repeal of 19 Civil Rights Law 50-a is important, because 20 (indiscernible) students (indiscernible) should be 21 made available to survivors. 22 New Yorkers deserve to know who New York 23 City, and police departments across the state, are 24 employing when they come into our schools and harm 25 us. 466 1 This should be a priority for New York, and 2 I hope you take this testimony into consideration to 3 make your decisions. 4 Thank you. 5 ROSE ANTOINE: My name is Rose Antoine. 6 I'm 16, and I'm from Brooklyn. 7 I'm currently a junior in (indiscernible) 8 Brooklyn High School for Music and Theater. 9 I identify as a first-generation 10 Haitian-American Black girl. 11 I'm also a participate -- a participant in 12 Sisters in Strength at Girls for Gender Equity, who 13 I'm also representing today. 14 Sisters in Strength is a restorative justice 15 group for girls of color, to shed light on issues 16 that are important to them, and support each other. 17 Thank you for taking the time to listen to my 18 testimony today, and I hope this start a 19 conversation which lead to change being made. 20 Today I'm here to talk about police 21 brutality, and the excessive force police use in our 22 communities to harm those around me and people 23 I care about. 24 I feel our police brutality relates to 25 everyone. 467 1 Over this past year, there has been several 2 incidents where police used excessive force on 3 innocent people for various reasons that we're yet 4 determined why. 5 Once -- once, when me and my brother was 6 driving, ran a red light by accident, and we were 7 stopped and pulled over. 8 The cop axed -- ask us if we knew what 9 happened? 10 My brother said, and he acknowledged, that he 11 ran a red light. 12 The cop looked at us in a very intimidating 13 way, and we felt very threatened. 14 The police officer eventually let us go 15 because my brother have never been stopped or 16 receive a ticket. 17 Afterwards, a White woman walked up to us -- 18 a White woman walked up to us and let us know that 19 she was -- she has been watching, and would have 20 been a witness for us if anything would -- went 21 down, happened, or escalate. 22 I -- I should not feel unsafe and helpless 23 when encounter a police officer. 24 This situation showed me how unjust the 25 system is, and how skewed police officers' views can 468 1 be on people of color. 2 Many officers, when they have -- they use 3 brutal force, sexual harass, or sexual assault 4 community members, are -- who are involved of -- 5 in the death of someone, are never held 6 incountable (sic), or walk away from -- with no 7 consequences. 8 Did you know that 43 percent of police 9 officers agree with this sentiment? 10 Always following the rules is not compatible 11 with the need to get their job done. 12 Those 43 percent of police officers are in 13 the streets every day, and not afraid to use 14 excessive force on innocent people, that just to say 15 that their job is done. 16 Did you also know that people who are 17 African-American Blacks are twice as likely to be 18 killed by officer while being unarmed, in comparison 19 to their White counterparts? 20 These statistics tell me, when interacting 21 with a police officer as a Black girl, I should be 22 afraid. 23 We need to advocate and create a safe space 24 for everyone, and this starts with the way the NYPD 25 treats our community; being in concert for this 469 1 action, and create a transparency between the NYPD 2 and the community it serve. 3 My story is not unique. There are so many 4 young people who looks like me, from communities 5 like me, who are in need of greater police 6 accountabilities. 7 This is why I am here today testifying. 8 Your support of the Safer New York City Act 9 and, in particular, a full repeal of Civil Rights 10 Law 50-a, is important, because survivors knowing 11 the background of police officers will help us to 12 know their track records and keep us safe. 13 When the community is aware of what police 14 officers have done, we can build a stronger case for 15 accountabilities, and we can become a community that 16 prevents police violence instead of being a 17 community that strives on harm. 18 Please take my testimony into consideration 19 when making a decision. 20 Thank you for the opportunity to speak today. 21 MARIE ST. FORT: Good afternoon, everyone. 22 My name is Marie St. Fort. My pronoun is 23 she/her/hers, and I'm a high school student. 24 I'm in a program called Sisters in Strength 25 at Girls for Gender Equity. 470 1 In our program, we learn about power, 2 privilege, oppression, and it's impact on 3 intimate-partners' sexual gender-based violence. 4 We also engage in healing practices, healing 5 justice work, build community organizing, and engage 6 in organizing work. 7 Before I start, I just want to say thank you 8 to the -- thank you to the Assemblymembers and 9 Senators for being present, supporting the cause, 10 and amplifying the message. 11 I would also like to state that I will not 12 only be speaking on the topic of sexual harassment, 13 but also police brutality. 14 Sexual harassment, it can be found anywhere, 15 any place, at any time; places like schools, homes, 16 industry, and at work, in the morning, afternoon, 17 and night. 18 It's something most of us have experienced. 19 It could be anything, from someone cat-calling you 20 on the street, or touching you in ways you don't 21 feel comfortable with. 22 Most people who are survivors of sexual 23 harassment never tell anyone, and it's usually at 24 the hand of those -- of someone they know. 25 Survivors sometimes ask themselves questions, 471 1 like: Will they believe me? They probably think 2 I'm lying. Or will they think I'm a snitch? Or 3 just be embarrassed. 4 Sexual harassment has a huge impact on 5 people. 6 I'm pretty sure most of all in here has been 7 in situations -- in a situation where we were not 8 comfortable; not being comfortable in your own skin, 9 especially somewhere you go to every day, or 10 somewhere you have no choice but to go there. 11 No one likes the feeling of being 12 uncomfortable. 13 I know we can't put an end to sexual 14 harassment, and that anyone is capable of sexual 15 harassment. They might not know what they're doing 16 is sexual harassment, but everyone is capable of it. 17 Like, how these two police officers harassed 18 this girl, and they thought she was lying because -- 19 people thought she was lying because they didn't 20 believe two officers would do such a thing. 21 It's crazy because, when we do that, we just 22 hurt the victim more, and forces them to shut down. 23 It takes a lot for someone to open up on 24 something like sexual harassment. It's not 25 something we want. It's a disgusting thing that 472 1 happens, and we can't control it most time. 2 Why not help prevent it? 3 Just like how we can't put an end to police 4 brutality, it's crazy (indiscernible) on how we got 5 to run, and hide from those who's supposed to be 6 keeping us safe and protected. 7 Some people get blindsided by the fact that 8 they are police officers, and that they are just 9 looking out for us and making sure that we're safe; 10 but yet they're the ones who are quick to kills us, 11 beat us to death, choke us to death, and shoot on 12 us. 13 And when you ask them, why? it's because they 14 felt threatened -- threatened by, what? -- or 15 self-defense. 16 But here's the crazy part: They do not get 17 consequences. The most they will get is probably a 18 paid suspension from work. You know, you get to 19 stay home after killing an innocent soul, and 20 getting paid for it. 21 Now please explain to me, how will they learn 22 from their so-called "mistakes" when there's no type 23 of consequences? 24 They just keep doing it over and over again. 25 Nothing is going to change unless we treat 473 1 them how they treat criminals: prison time. 2 Stop justifying the things these police 3 officers be doing, and start punishing them for what 4 they be doing, or else they are going to keep doing 5 it. 6 Let's start thinking about ways to prevent 7 sexual harassment and ways to end police brutality. 8 To help prevent sexual harassment: 9 We could start by teaching young men ways to 10 properly approach a lady; 11 Help our young people to respect each other; 12 Don't do things to others you wouldn't want 13 to be done to you; 14 And, finally, adults, to please listen. When 15 someone comes to you and tell you that they have 16 been sexually harassed from workplaces, school, 17 home... anywhere, take it seriously. 18 And to help put an end to police brutality, 19 we need to start taking actions. Let them see what 20 they're doing will not go by like that, and that 21 there's no consequences -- and that there's 22 consequences to everyone's actions, and that there's 23 no free pass, and we're not favoring nothing. 24 Thank you again to everyone for attending 25 this hearing. 474 1 STACEY KING: Good afternoon. 2 My name is Stacey Ann (ph.). My pronouns are 3 she, hers, and hers. 4 I'm a senior in high school, and I'm part 5 of -- I'm a part of Girls for Gender Equity and 6 Sisters in Strength program, or "SIS." 7 SIS helps young women of color become more 8 aware of the social injustice that goes on in our 9 schools, and -- high schools, and community. 10 We primarily focus on healing, and how to aid 11 people who have experienced sexual violence, 12 gender-based violence. 13 I would like to thank everyone for hearing me 14 out today, and I hope everyone is well. 15 I attend a school that has a formal 16 dress-code policy. Understand that we're required 17 to where a uniform; however, the policy does not 18 always seem logical. 19 The ways that they choose to enforce them do 20 not make for a positive school environment. 21 In my junior year, I had experience with -- 22 I had experience, where I was wearing a skirt that 23 was above my knee, and my principal and my teacher 24 called me out about it in public. 25 This made me feel self-conscious about my 475 1 body, and enraged. 2 I don't think the way I dress has any impact 3 on how I learn. 4 I recognize that this was not as severe as an 5 experience as many of my friends and fellow 6 classmates. They have been sent home because of 7 their dresses and clothing. 8 Many of my friends live an hour or so away 9 from school. This travel time takes away from their 10 learning and time in class. 11 Additionally, we receive robo calls at 6 a.m. 12 and 7 p.m. every day about the uniform. They are 13 pre-recorded messages that tells us what to wear, in 14 advance of coming to school. 15 Our uniform policy is gender-biased and 16 culturally insensitive, so this message that we 17 receive daily is offensive, and is how we are 18 beginning and ending our day. 19 The voice recording targets 20 females-identified (sic) students in some cultural 21 or -- and/or religious dress, because it says for us 22 not to wear low-cut shirts, see-through clothing, 23 short skirts, spaghetti straps, leggings, 24 flip-flops, no headband, hair covering, do-rags, or 25 headwear. 476 1 This makes me feel like I am a distraction, 2 and that I am responsible for my classmate learning 3 or how they learn. 4 Schools frequently have gender-biased dress 5 codes, and these dress codes infer that young women 6 are responsible for their own experience of sexual 7 assault because of what they are wearing. 8 This promotes rape culture. 9 This should not be the case in any situation, 10 because we are responsible for our own action when 11 rules are enforced, and mostly targets women of 12 color. 13 New York State should increase the number of 14 Title (indiscernible) coordinators in schools, and 15 expand Title 9 protection. 16 Title 9 coordinators, coupled with 17 comprehensive sex education, would allow everyone to 18 feel safer and supported in schools. 19 Everyone deserve basic human rights, and 20 I would like for everyone to be aware of Title 9, 21 and, most importantly, be comfortable and safe 22 whatever environment they are in. 23 I believe I should feel and truly be safe in 24 school. 25 Safety looks to me -- safety to me looks like 477 1 coming to school and not feeling targeted or being 2 called out on how I dress, feel guilty or ashamed of 3 my body, and, more importantly, to be supported 4 mentally and emotionally to be the best version of 5 myself. 6 Thank you for the opportunity for testifying 7 today. 8 ASHLEY TURNER: Thank you. 9 I don't know if this one is on. 10 It is on? Okay. 11 Thank you. 12 Good evening, at this point, 13 Chairperson (indiscernible), Biaggi, thank you 14 for -- Chairperson Crespo, Chairperson Walker, and 15 other members who have stayed this late in the 16 evening. 17 My name is Ashley Sawyer. I'm an attorney, 18 and I'm the director of policy and government 19 relations at Girls for Gender Equity. 20 Girls for Gender Equity obviously has a very 21 unique position in this conversation. 22 We have been around for close to 20 years, 23 but we're most known because we are the 24 institutional home of the #MeToo movement. 25 The very movement that set the stage for this 478 1 hearing today and the conversation that we're having 2 was founded by a Black woman, Tarana Burke, who was 3 senior director at GGE when #MeToo went viral. 4 And the young people you just heard from are 5 all members of Sisters in Strength, which is the 6 only organization in the entire United States that 7 is the #MeToo movement youth organization. 8 And I am grateful for you all taking the time 9 to hear from young people who identify as survivors, 10 and allies of sexual-assault survivors, and the 11 issues that are coming up for them. 12 The broader framing is, young people want to 13 see changes happening in their schools and in their 14 communities. 15 And we're grateful for the sexual-harassment 16 working group for opening up this conversation about 17 sexual harassment, but we can't have a conversation 18 about sexual harassment or sexual assault in the 19 workplace and ignore the fact that, for many people, 20 millions of people, who have to attend school, that 21 is their workplace. 22 Every single day, by law, they're mandated to 23 go to a place where they may experience sexual 24 assault or sexual harassment. 25 We know that it's not unique to New York 479 1 City. 2 We know that, in Binghamton, New York, we 3 just learned of four girls of color, Black and 4 Latinx girls, who were forced to strip down into 5 their underwear in front of a principal and a nurse 6 because they were giggling too much. 7 That is sexual harassment. 8 We understand that, for young people, they're 9 not afforded the protections that adults would have 10 in the workplace. And even as you heard today, 11 adults are not getting the support and protections 12 that they need. 13 So you can only imagine what it means to be a 14 student. 15 We also are very grateful for you, 16 particularly, Assemblymember Walker, for naming 17 earlier that the #MeToo movement was founded 18 specifically to name the ways that Black girls and 19 girls of color were impacted by sexual violence. 20 And we are centering cis and trans girls and 21 gender not-conforming (sic) youth and non-binary 22 youth because they're so often left out of the 23 conversation around sexual violence. 24 We also want to name the fact that sexual 25 violence happens at the hands of police at alarming 480 1 rates, which my colleague Kylynn will testify to, 2 about the alarming rates of police sexual assault 3 and misconduct, which you learned about. 4 And I want to name, that, earlier this year, 5 four -- there was a complaint filed on behalf of 6 four girls in New York; two who raped in their 7 schools, and, two who were sexually harassed, one 8 who was subjected to trans-phobic harassment in 9 particular. 10 And this is not unique. 11 Young people are experiencing sexual 12 harassment at alarming rates across this 13 state (sic), including in New York. 14 Two years ago, three years ago, we did a 15 report called "The Schools Girls Deserve," and it 16 found that one in three students experience some 17 form of sexual harassment in school. 18 So, if we're going to take the work -- take 19 the action to address sexual assault and sexual 20 harassment, we have to begin with schools. 21 We have to understand that, if we don't teach 22 comprehensive, quality sex ed with a focus on 23 consent education, the same people who are doing 24 harmful acts, committing acts of sexual harassment, 25 in their high schools and in their middle schools 481 1 will go on to do it in the workplace. 2 And so while the package of bills in front of 3 you is mostly focused on changing standards that 4 affect adults, we could not let this opportunity go 5 by without acknowledging that the people who -- some 6 of the people who are most marginalized and most 7 vulnerable to sexual violence are not getting the 8 support that they need. 9 And, the prevention that needs to happen must 10 happen in the environments that young people are in. 11 Schools are the places where we can do some 12 of the most radical, powerful shift -- 13 culture-shifting work. 14 And so we recognize that, in addition to what 15 we have asked for on the local level in New York 16 City, our Title 9 coordinators, New York City has 17 1.1 million students, 1 adult, 1 adult who's 18 responsible for investigating claims of sexual 19 assault or harassment in the entire school district. 20 And so we've been pushing a budget ask that 21 we will soon -- I'm hope -- we'll hopefully win, to 22 see if we can get at least seven Title 9 23 coordinators to respond to and prevent school-based 24 sexual assault. 25 But on the state level, we know that there's 482 1 a lot of work to do, and we hope to partner with you 2 all, and particularly next session, to think 3 specifically about: How are we addressing the issue 4 of sexual assault and harassment in schools; and how 5 can we address this issue as it particularly affects 6 youth of color. 7 And, again, I appreciate you, 8 Assemblymember Walker, for naming the ways it 9 impacts people who are incarcerated. 10 The national data shows that 90 percent of 11 the young people who are put into girls' prisons 12 have experienced some form of sexual harassment or 13 assault. 90 percent. 14 There's no other institution where you're 15 going to see such a high concentration. 16 And so as you all look to this package of 17 bills, we are grateful for the time and energy that 18 you've spent with this existing package, and just 19 being here tonight, recognizing the hour. 20 But also looking to you to please not ignore 21 the ways in which young people, cis and trans girls 22 and non-binary youth, particularly youth of color, 23 are impacted by sexual violence. 24 And we are deeply grateful for your time and 25 your energy, your commitment, to this issue. 483 1 Thank you. 2 KYLYNN GRIER: Good evening. 3 Thank you all for still being here. 4 My name is Kylynn Grier, and I'm the policy 5 manager at Girls for Gender Equity. 6 Girls for Gender Equity works to -- is an 7 organization challenging the structural forces that 8 work to obstruct the freedom, full expression, and 9 rights of girls, transgender, and gender non-forming 10 young people. 11 We work daily -- sorry. 12 We work daily with young women and TGNC youth 13 of color who are policed at every juncture of their 14 lives; on the way to school by NYPD officers, in 15 school by NYPD school safety agents, and while 16 accessing city services. 17 Young women and TGNC young people are 18 criminalized for normal adolescent behavior, 19 oftentimes, hyper-sexualized due to 20 historically-located racialized and gender-based 21 stereotypes. And their bodies are regularly policed 22 because of their race, ethnicity, sexual 23 orientation, gender identity, and/or gender 24 expression. 25 Three shocking revelations of police 484 1 misconduct have served as a tipping point for policy 2 change that organizations have been advancing for 3 years. 4 Earlier this year, BuzzFeed News exposed that 5 hundreds of officers were allowed to keep their jobs 6 after committing egregious, fireable offenses. 7 These offenses included lying under oath to grand 8 juries and district attorneys, lying on official 9 reports, physically attacking innocent people, 10 engaging in excessive force, and committing sexual 11 misconduct against members of the public. 12 Then, two scathing reports emerged of an 13 18 -- a then-18-year-old teenage girl, under the 14 alias Anna Chambers, who was handcuffed, raped, and 15 sexually assaulted in the back of a police van in 16 Brooklyn, New York, and who was one of many 17 survivors of police sexual violence against 18 community members in and out of schools across 19 New York State. 20 Shortly thereafter, there was shock and 21 outrage as the nation heard about the treatment of 22 Jazmine Headley, a 23-year-old mother, whose baby 23 was ripped from her arms by the New York Police -- 24 New York Depart -- New York City Department of 25 Social Services and the New York Police Department. 485 1 These experiences and narratives are often 2 unheard in mainstream media, in conversations about 3 policing, or in conversations seeking to address 4 gender-based violence. 5 This silence exists alongside a multitude of 6 systemic barriers, purporting survivors -- supports, 7 and often victim-blaming, and criminalization of 8 survivors. 9 This is absolutely and unequivocally rooted 10 in racialized and gender-based discrimination. 11 For these reasons, Girls for Gender Equity 12 and partners call on New York State -- the New York 13 State Legislature to pass the Safer New York Act. 14 Included in this package is a full repel -- 15 repeal of Civil Rights Law 50-a. It is an essential 16 tool for transparency about police abuses 17 experienced by women, gender (indiscernible) people, 18 and all New Yorkers. 19 We look to partner with you, and support your 20 leadership, to pass a full repeal of this law. 21 A repeal of Civil Rights Law 50-a would 22 follow progress made in New York City to increase 23 transparency, an important step on the road to safer 24 communities. 25 As organizations that serve and advocate on 486 1 behalf of women and girls, many of whom are 2 survivors of gender-based violence, we know that 3 acts of gender-based violence are often patterned, 4 manifested by extreme power differentials, and are 5 very rarely isolated incidents. 6 These power differentials expressly -- are 7 especially exacerbated in police and community 8 interactions, with a gun-carrying officer, and added 9 layers of an agency that has historic culture of 10 being unaccountable and non-transparent. 11 Even though sexual assault and gender-based 12 violence is drastically underreported, a 13 Cato Institute study of incidents reported shows 14 that sexual misconduct is the second-most reported 15 form of police misconduct. 16 As of February 14, 2018, the New York City 17 Civilian Complaint Review Board, a New York City 18 police-oversight agency, adopted a policy to expand 19 the agency's purview to include incidents of sexual 20 harassment by NYPD officers against members of the 21 public. 22 According to the CCRB, 117 complaints were 23 received in a short 15-month period that included 24 allegations, from cat-calls and sexual propositions, 25 to unwanted touching and rape. 487 1 It is imperative that police personnel 2 records be made available to survivors of police 3 sexual violence to better understand any history of 4 harm that has been perpetrated by an officer. 5 Repeal of New York State Civil Rights 6 Law 50-a would be a significant step in ensuring 7 that officers who have repeatedly harmed community 8 members across New York State are held accountable, 9 and the full repeal of the law is necessary for true 10 community safety. 11 Thank you. 12 SENATOR BIAGGI: Thank you, all, so much, for 13 staying this long to share your testimony with us. 14 Each one of you, and the words that you 15 spoke, are incredibly powerful, and incredibly 16 important; and let me tell you why. 17 Because you just put a massive crack in our 18 consciousness, that I don't think that many people 19 in this room even thought was there. 20 You connected a law that I don't think 21 I personally would have connected to sexual 22 harassment. 23 I support the repeal of 50-a, I have during 24 my journey here. And I don't think I would have 25 connected the two. 488 1 And that is a blind spot that you just put a 2 light on for me, and that's a remarkable, remarkable 3 thing that you did. 4 It's incredibly important that you continue 5 to raise your voices. Do not let anybody silence 6 you. Do not let anybody tell you that your voices 7 don't matter, because your voices do matter, because 8 you just created change in this room, today. 9 So, thank you. 10 First, we're going to hear from 11 Assemblywoman Walker -- oh, Assemblymember Crespo. 12 Pardon me. 13 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Quick question: 14 So, thank you, all, also, for your testimony. 15 If you -- for all of you who are students, if 16 you are harassed by a teacher, who do you go to? 17 OFF-CAMERA SPEAKER: Guidance counselor. 18 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Guidance counselor. 19 If you feel that you've been harassed by a 20 school safety agent outside of the school building, 21 who do you go to? 22 MARIE ST. FORT: I would probably go to the 23 person I'm most comfortable with in the school, or 24 outside of school. 25 KYLYNN GRIER: As it stands now, there's 489 1 actually not a process. And -- well, that's not 2 completely true. 3 There is a process, but it is nontransparent. 4 Right now, if a young person reports to an 5 adult in the school, at the end of the day, where 6 that report ends up is the internal affairs bureau 7 of the NYPD. 8 And so what that means, is that young people 9 are expected to report to the very officers, 10 uniformed, that did the harm in the first place. 11 We also know that the internal affairs bureau 12 of the NYPD has been notoriously nontransparent, 13 and, still, it's just a really tough place for 14 anyone to report anything. 15 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: So there's no -- there's 16 no current cooperation between DOE and school safety 17 officers, where the student could go to the 18 administration of their school, principals, 19 somebody, within the school building, to make that 20 formal complaint, and have the school then submit it 21 in a more formal sense to the NYPD? 22 KYLYNN GRIER: I can't speak to exactly what 23 is the MOU between the NYPD and the department of 24 education. 25 What I can say, is that, regardless, those 490 1 reports end up on the desks of the internal affairs 2 bureau of the NYPD. 3 (Inaudible comment by Ashley Turner to 4 Kylynn Grier.) 5 KYLYNN GRIER: Right. 6 And there's -- and to build on that, there's 7 not someone who's in the schools or accessible. 8 Title 9 coordinators, in particular, would be 9 one key place that young people could go, if there 10 were enough. 11 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: So all of you are part 12 of an organization that has made you -- given you a 13 platform, and encouraged you to speak out, and is 14 preparing you to be advocates; not just victims, but 15 advocates for change. 16 How many of you have experienced personally, 17 or know someone directly, who was sexually harassed 18 by or assaulted by a school safety agent or an 19 officer that was assigned to your school? 20 NEILLAH PETIT FRERE: I've seen it, but, 21 like, it hasn't personally happened to me. 22 I've seen, like, police officers, like, talk 23 to students, like, in a very inappropriate way that 24 they shouldn't be speaking to a student. 25 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: (Indiscernible) 491 1 teachers? 2 NEILLAH PETIT FRERE: Teachers? Uhm, no. 3 MARIE ST. FORT: Can I say something? 4 It had happened to me before. 5 It was outside of school. There's a store by 6 my school. And a police officer that goes to my 7 school, he was talking to me so inappropriately. 8 Where you going, Big Head, (indiscernible)? 9 Talked to me like that. 10 But, yeah, it's made me feel uncomfortable. 11 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: I didn't consider, until 12 you guys made this testimony, just how susceptible 13 those interactions are on a daily basis. 14 And, especially when those officers are 15 imperative to providing safety when leaving the 16 school building, and all the other things that we -- 17 the relationship we want them to be able to build 18 with students, but how susceptible that is to 19 someone committing some sort of harassment. 20 And if there is no transparent process for 21 reporting that, it's extremely problematic. 22 So, I appreciate the feedback on that. 23 And as I call on Assemblywoman Walker, I just 24 want to also thank you for -- the organization, for 25 what you represent. And to acknowledge that 492 1 Ms. Burke is a proud Bronxite, as we acknowledge all 2 of the Brooklyn reps that are here. 3 Ms. Walker. 4 ASSEMBLYWOMAN WALKER: Well, I think I've 5 heard that Brooklyn is in the house. 6 Uhm, although, we're very grateful to 7 The Bronx for the pizza, that I didn't get a slice 8 of. 9 So, I am inspired by your testimony here 10 today, and I guess the thing that inspires me the 11 most is that, we put a lot of emphasis on supporting 12 programs that are very male-centric. 13 You know, I remember, we were having a 14 conversation about supporting a basketball program 15 in our -- in my community, and I represent the 16 neighborhoods of Brownsville, East New York, parts 17 of Bed-Stuy, Crown Heights, and East Flatbush. 18 And they said, well -- I said, Well, what 19 about the girls? 20 Oh, we got girl's basketball. 21 And it's, like, no, it's a boy's sport, but, 22 you know, generally, and -- but you have girls 23 playing. 24 I do recognize that a lot of girls play it. 25 But they -- you know, they -- they give us 493 1 credence with lots of programming, but through the 2 lens of boys. 3 And so this is special to me because, you 4 know, it's -- it's -- it's girly. 5 And -- and a lot of times our stories are not 6 heard. 7 And I appreciate this, because it -- it -- 8 you even had me tap into experiences. 9 When I was, you know, in high school, and 10 I remember a teacher told me to get on the desk and 11 do a couple of jumping jacks. 12 And, you know, even as a young girl growing 13 up, I, you know, was always a big girl. 14 And when that happened to me, I guess it 15 wasn't until you sitting here today, with your 16 testimony, it sort of struck a cord, that that was 17 sexual harassment. 18 And -- so -- so I thank you for -- for 19 helping me to see myself. 20 One of the -- I guess, the question that 21 I have is with respect to the police department, and 22 sexual harassment and the way it's addressed. 23 There was a young girl in my district who 24 was, allegedly, raped, or a sexual assault, in a 25 park. 494 1 When the report came out, it was -- it was -- 2 allegedly, it was done by a group of boys. 3 And then when the report came out, they 4 victimized her. Said that, you know, she was having 5 sex with her father. 6 I mean, it was just crazy, crazy thing. 7 I don't if you remember that. 8 But we were having conversations with the 9 police department about it. You know, the comment 10 that we heard was, Well, most of the people who are 11 sexually assaulted -- who are raped are raped by 12 somebody that knows them. 13 As if, you know, it makes a difference, if 14 you're raped by someone who knows you or someone 15 that's a complete stranger. 16 So hearing your testimony today with respect 17 50-a, and other issues, do you -- are -- do you know 18 if the police department reports instances of sexual 19 harassment, sexual assault, or rape, as that? 20 Or, when it happens, and someone knows that 21 person, is it reported like a domestic-violence 22 scenario? 23 KYLYNN GRIER: I can speak to the 24 sexual-harassment and sexual-violence reporting. 25 Currently, they do not report on incidents or 495 1 allegations of sexual violence. 2 (Inaudible comment by Ashley Turner to 3 Kylynn Grier.) 4 KYLYNN GRIER: Oh, if the assailant is a cop. 5 ASSEMBLYWOMAN WALKER: If the assailant is a 6 cop, they don't report any of that information? 7 KYLYNN GRIER: (Microphone off.) 8 No. 9 ASSEMBLYWOMAN WALKER: But I'm also 10 wondering, what about, even in instances where -- 11 you know, where they're not? 12 Because, I looked at, sort of, some Compstat 13 reports prior to coming here, not necessarily 14 thinking about sexual violence per se, and it was 15 sort of alarming to me that there weren't very high 16 instances of sexual violence or sexual assault that 17 was reported in the 73rd Precinct, particularly as 18 the precinct that I was looking at it at. 19 But it doesn't take away from the fact that 20 I know this is happening, but what's happening with 21 respect to it being reported? 22 Is it not being reported because people 23 aren't necessarily coming forward, or is it not 24 being reported because it's being misconstrued as 25 domestic violence, where we see is very high, as 496 1 opposed to calling it for what it is? 2 So, you don't have to answer that, but it's 3 just, I guess, another thing that your testimony 4 today really just sort of put into my head. 5 So, again, where's your program located? 6 OFF-CAMERA SPEAKER: (Inaudible/microphone 7 off.) 8 ASSEMBLYWOMAN WALKER: Where? 9 OFF-CAMERA SPEAKER: (Inaudible/microphone 10 off) we're actually in Councilmember -- oh, excuse 11 me, in Assemblymember Simon's district, in -- on 12 Chapel Street. 13 ASSEMBLYWOMAN WALKER: Nice. 14 Are you in any -- 15 OFF-CAMERA SPEAKER: (Inaudible/microphone 16 off). 17 ASSEMBLYWOMAN WALKER: Are you in any 18 schools? 19 ASHLEY TURNER: Yeah, so, historically, GGE, 20 we've been around for almost 18 years now. 21 We run two after-school programs that were 22 Brooklyn-based. And our youth-development programs, 23 including Sisters in Strength, and our Young Woman's 24 Advisory Council, both serve young people from all 25 five boroughs. 497 1 And so young people could apply regardless of 2 where they live. 3 So we had young people from Staten Island, 4 and The Bronx, all coming to Brooklyn to be a part 5 of both of our youth-development programs. 6 And our after-school programs have, 7 historically, been just in Brooklyn. 8 ASSEMBLYWOMAN WALKER: So I guess -- well, I 9 guess one of the other questions then, is: Do you 10 provide transportation? 11 STACEY KING: For young people, when young 12 people come to our program, and we always make sure 13 they have MetroCards. 14 And I forgot to mention that, as we phase out 15 of our after-school programming, we're providing 16 technical assistance to schools across the five 17 boroughs, specifically highlighting the research 18 that came out of our "School Girls Deserve" report. 19 That report is where we talk specifically about -- 20 it was done alongside 100 students; talked 21 specifically about the issue of sexual harassment, 22 sexual violence, that girls of color and youth of 23 color experience, as well as criminalization that 24 they experience in school. 25 And so the outgrowth of that report, in our 498 1 years of running after-school programming, has been 2 providing -- we will begin to provide technical 3 assistance to DOE schools that take an interest in 4 wanting to find ways to make their schools more 5 safe, healing, and affirming for youth of color. 6 ASSEMBLYWOMAN WALKER: So -- so you're 7 phasing out of the after-school -- 8 ASHLEY TURNER: Yes. 9 ASSEMBLYWOMAN WALKER: -- business, period? 10 ASHLEY TURNER: And shifting to providing TA 11 for DOE schools that want to do better, in terms of 12 sexual harassment, racial-justice issues, cultural 13 competency, and to how to support students across 14 the gender spectrum. 15 ASSEMBLYWOMAN WALKER: Do you -- are you 16 perform -- are you participating in a 17 curriculum-based scenario? 18 So, it's going to be, like, during the day, 19 and will the students be able to avail themselves of 20 the -- in -- in school-time programming? 21 ASHLEY TURNER: So the two youth programs 22 that we run, existing, separate from our 23 after-school programs, we have a curriculum for -- a 24 curriculum that is rooted in what young people 25 mentioned earlier today, about learning about 499 1 systems of oppression, learning about race and 2 gender and class. 3 Young people get to engage in both of the 4 curriculum -- both of the curricula, excuse me, and 5 both of our youth programming. 6 And then there's another set of curricula, 7 specifically targeting at adults and schools, and 8 how they can be better advocates for young people, 9 and make their schools more safe and more affirming 10 for young people. 11 ASSEMBLYWOMAN WALKER: Okay. Well, I guess, 12 we heard an invitation earlier today from the 13 Senator to the division of human rights. 14 So I'm going to give you, also, an 15 invitation, to say that: 16 I think what you're doing is spectacular. 17 ASHLEY TURNER: Thank you. 18 ASSEMBLYWOMAN WALKER: And I'm not poaching 19 here, but, you know, Brownsville is a beautiful 20 community, and with some beautiful Black girls in 21 there, and who, you know, would gain a lot from 22 having access to a program such as yours. 23 So I extend to you an invitation to 24 participate in some of the programming that's 25 contained within our community. 500 1 And I look forward to working with you. 2 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: I'll answer that for you 3 with some funding. They would more than happy to -- 4 [Laughter.] 5 ASSEMBLYWOMAN WALKER: Oh, I'm willing. 6 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Assemblywoman Niou. 7 ASSEMBLYWOMAN WALKER: I'll give them 8 $2 million if I could. 9 Twenty. 10 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: First, I just wanted to 11 say thank you, guys, for being here, and for 12 speaking up on behalf of your peers, and for 13 yourself. 14 It is incredibly, incredibly brave. 15 For my own experience, I wasn't able to speak 16 up for over 20 years. 17 So, I just wanted to say that I commend you 18 on your bravery, and, that -- that it matters; that 19 it matters -- everything that you're saying matters. 20 I know you guys work with a lot of TGNC 21 youth. 22 You heard my last questions, probably, and 23 I'm just going to reiterate them to you guys, and 24 see if you guys have some other thoughts on policy, 25 on how we can change things in New York State, 501 1 because the discrimination is so pervasive and 2 systemic, it makes it so that young people, just 3 walking out of a, you know, club, walking out of 4 school, they could get arrested just for being 5 transgender or gender non-conforming. 6 So, I wanted to see if there was anything 7 that we can do. 8 As -- you know, we -- our -- we just passed 9 GENDA this year, way long overdue. 10 And if there was anything that you guys 11 wanted to suggest that we can do as a state. 12 ASHLEY TURNER: Well, a couple of things, 13 really quickly, (indiscernible) time. 14 Actually, there's a rally happening right now 15 that we're missing, in support of trans folks who 16 have been murdered. 17 I think you may know -- 18 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: I think your mic may not 19 be on. 20 ASHLEY TURNER: Oh, sorry. 21 How do I turn this on? 22 Hello? Is this better? 23 Okay. 24 As you know -- you may know that there's 25 actually a rally happening in the city right now. 502 1 The life ex -- and it's the "Keep Your Hands 2 Off Our Trans Bodies" Rally, and it's in 3 Washington Square Park. 4 But most people know, life expectancy for 5 Black trans women is, like, 36. And so that's -- 6 it's a huge issue. 7 GGE centers all -- centers most marginalized 8 folks in all of our narratives and in our work. 9 So some of the things that we've been looking 10 for, particularly in the context of young people in 11 schools, have been thinking about, how do schools 12 provide the type of -- get the type of technical 13 assistance that they need, to understand what's 14 happening for trans youth, and how can they do a 15 better job of supporting them. 16 And we would love to partner with you, and 17 have additional conversations with you about, what 18 are the things that came up in the reporting that we 19 did, or that participatory action research that we 20 did, and what are the things that trans youth are 21 asking for in their schools. 22 We try our best to make sure that trans youth 23 and non-binary youth are included in all of our 24 programming. 25 And those young people have the ideas about 503 1 what they want to see happening in their schools to 2 make them feel safer in their schools, and in their 3 the community. 4 And we would love to have a conversation with 5 you about some of the feedback that we've received 6 from young people. 7 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: I would love that. 8 You know, just for the record, I mean, our 9 body knows that, you know, trans youth have the 10 highest suicide rates. 11 We all know that -- I've lost many friends. 12 But I -- I would have to say that, we all 13 know that there's a huge systemic issue. 14 And so we really thank you for your work on 15 those issues. 16 And, please, you know, any -- any ideas that 17 you all come up with, when it comes to protecting 18 folks, and making life just a little bit more 19 bearable, is helpful. 20 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Assemblywoman Simon? 21 You should join us up here. 22 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMON: Try it again? 23 There we go. 24 Thank you. 25 And I want to thank all of you, first of all, 504 1 for your testimony, which is really incredibly 2 powerful, and, for being here all day long, and 3 listening to us yammer on at times. 4 And -- so thank you for -- for -- for being 5 here. 6 So, Stacey Ann? Right? 7 I went to an all-girls' Catholic school and 8 had to wear a uniform every day, so your testimony 9 really reached out to me. 10 Are you going to a parochial school, or a 11 charter school, or -- 12 STACEY KING: I go to a public school. 13 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMON: A public school? 14 STACEY KING: Yeah, uhm -- yeah. 15 'Cause, when I first -- where I attended to 16 school, like, in ninth grade, before, it was -- it 17 didn't have a uniform policy. 18 So me coming into freshman year, we had a 19 uniform policy. 20 So, it's very inconsistent. So it's like -- 21 yeah. 22 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMON: So they have an 23 inconsistent uniform policy? 24 STACEY KING: Yeah. 25 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMON: That's bizarre. 505 1 And -- and -- I -- I also am freaking out 2 about the robo call at 6:00 in the morning. 3 What about the boys, what's their uniform 4 policy? 5 STACEY KING: It's the same as ours, but, 6 like, since -- it's more targeted towards us as 7 girls. 8 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMON: Uh-huh? 9 STACEY KING: So, like, if I wear -- if a guy 10 comes into school with like a tank top, he won't be 11 called out or called home. 12 But if I come -- if I come to school with, 13 like, you know, like, maybe a spaghetti-strap, 14 I don't know, tank top, with a cardigan, or 15 something like that, they'd be, like, Oh, what are 16 you wearing? You know, you shouldn't be wearing 17 that. Like, put on a shirt. 18 I understand that there's certain policy that 19 I abide with the rules, and I'm, like, respect the 20 school uniform policy. 21 But I feel like -- like, just the other day, 22 they sent another robo call, saying, you know, like, 23 oh, we're a distraction. And now what you wear will 24 create an unsafe environment. 25 So it's just, like -- yeah. 506 1 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMON: Yeah, cringe. We're 2 all cringing here about that. 3 ASHLEY TURNER: Can I just add? 4 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMON: Yes, sure, of course. 5 ASHLEY TURNER: I apologize. 6 So there's national data that backs up, that 7 Black girls are more likely to be targeted for the 8 clothing that they wear. 9 So even if there's a policy about what young 10 people wear, Black girls and Latinx girls are more 11 likely to be told that they're dressing 12 inappropriately because of their body size. 13 And what happens is, we've heard reports from 14 young people say, that they were told that the 15 reason boys are distracted, the reason sexual 16 harassment is happening, is because of the clothing 17 that they are wearing. 18 And so we -- yeah, so that's the problem. 19 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMON: I mean, I think that -- 20 that is, obviously, a bigger problem in communities 21 of color. It's certainly a problem for women and 22 girls, generally, I think, about clothing. 23 I certainly remember that being something 24 that I was plagued by as well as a young girl. 25 And we were rolling up our skirts in those 507 1 days. The skirts were below your knee, and 2 everybody was rolling up their skirts. 3 And -- and -- so there's a lot of messaging 4 about -- about -- about clothing. 5 So I'm also curious, for the rest of you who 6 are not in schools with a uniform policy, about that 7 kind of -- the kinds of comments that you may get 8 with regard to what you're wearing, and how, if at 9 all, it has changed the way you dress for school, 10 and has made you comfortable or uncomfortable? 11 NEILLAH PETIT FRERE: Yeah, I think your body 12 is -- takes a huge part in dressing policies, 13 because it can be like a really skinny girl wearing 14 the same thing as you. But if you have a more, 15 I don't know, curvey body -- 16 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMON: Voluptuous? 17 NEILLAH PETIT FRERE: -- yeah, like, you 18 could get your house called, you could get sent 19 home, or they give you a big shirt to wear. 20 And that -- it's really unfair, because it 21 makes -- it starts making you just, like, feeling 22 insecure about your own body, because, if I'm being 23 pulled out of class, why can't she get pulled out of 24 class, because we're, basically, wearing the same 25 thing. 508 1 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMON: So, I wanted to just -- 2 well, I'll leave it at that. 3 But I wanted to just tell you again how 4 impressive your testimony has been here today, and 5 the work that you're doing. 6 And thank you very much for leading this 7 charge, and for being there for -- for these girls, 8 and for you being there for each other, and for the 9 other girls in -- in your schools. 10 And I'm really looking forward to continuing 11 to work with you guys. 12 Thank you. 13 OFF-CAMERA SPEAKER: Thank you. 14 SENATOR BIAGGI: Thank you very, very much 15 for your testimony. 16 I want to just end on one note, because 17 I think that this is an important one, not that the 18 others were not. Every point that was made was 19 incredibly important. 20 But, if there are instances that you 21 experience after this day, that you feel you can't 22 raise to someone in your school or your community, 23 you have allies here in government. 24 And I -- you know, I think I'm going -- I'm 25 not going on a ledge by saying, all of my colleagues 509 1 here, we are here for you. 2 You can pick up the phone and you can call 3 our offices, you can e-mail us, you can tweet at us, 4 you can even send us messages through Instagram or 5 Twitter or Facebook; whatever is easiest for you. 6 You're not alone, we hear you. 7 And please use your government as a resource 8 to have your voices heard. 9 Thank you. 10 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Thank you. 11 (All witnesses say "Thank you.") 12 SENATOR BIAGGI: Next we're going to hear 13 from the National Domestic Workers Alliance. 14 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Thank you, and thank you 15 for your patience. 16 MARISSA SENTENO: I want to, first of all, 17 thank the Joint Committee on Sexual Harassment in 18 the Workplace, Part 2. Right? 19 We really appreciate being able to come down 20 here today and really tell our story. 21 My name is Marissa Senteno. I am with the 22 National Domestic Workers Alliance. I am the 23 enforcement program manager for our New York 24 chapter. 25 So that means I organize domestic workers in 510 1 New York City and New York State, specifically 2 around enforcing their labor rights, especially as 3 addressed under the Domestic Worker Bill of Rights. 4 And if you don't know our organization, the 5 National Domestic Workers Alliance is the nation's 6 leading voice for dignity and fairness for millions 7 of domestic workers in the United States. 8 We were founded in 2007, and NDWA works for 9 the respect and recognition and inclusion of -- in 10 labor protections for domestic workers, most of whom 11 are women, women of color. 12 The alliance itself is powered by 13 60 affiliate organizations. And then we also have 14 individual membership and local chapters, of which, 15 here in New York, we have a New York local chapter 16 of approximately 3,000-plus contacts -- not 17 contacts -- participants, yeah, 3,000-plus 18 participant members. 19 And then the organization, as a whole, has 20 about 35,000 members nationwide. 21 So NDWA itself leads on several campaigns and 22 coalitions to advance the rights of domestic 23 workers. 24 We advocate for increased labor protections, 25 racial justice, gender equity, and humane 511 1 immigration policies. 2 So New York State was the first state in the 3 country to pass a Domestic Worker Bill of Rights in 4 2010. It sort of marked the culmination of a 6-year 5 grassroots organizing campaign. 6 It was the first legislation of its kind, and 7 the bill of rights closed gaps in labor laws that 8 left domestic workers with fewer rights than other 9 workers in the state, and it added new protections. 10 It since has inspired a national movement, 11 and we've been able to pass protections in nine 12 other states and one municipality. 13 So it's a big deal that New York State set 14 the bar high, to be able push other domestic workers 15 to seek labor protections for themselves in 16 nine-plus other states. 17 Here in New York, the Domestic Worker Bill of 18 Rights includes domestic workers in protections 19 against sexual harassment and discrimination by 20 changing the previous law, protecting workers in 21 places of employment of four or more for domestic 22 workers, to, if you're a domestic worker, a place of 23 employment of one or more. 24 This is key, because most domestic workers 25 themselves are the only -- are the only employees in 512 1 their household, and were previously excluded from 2 harassment and discrimination protections. 3 So what we're doing now is that, in the past 4 five years, NDWA has worked with our members and 5 local affiliates to explore the following strategies 6 in pursuit of a more worker-led, community-supported 7 enforcement process: 8 We prioritize leadership development amongst 9 domestic workers, that prepares and utilizes them as 10 key actors in supporting peers throughout the 11 enforcement process. 12 So what that means is, I train up worker 13 leaders, people who are part of our membership, to 14 understand their labor rights. 15 And they go specifically out into the 16 communities; they go to the parks, the libraries, 17 churches, they're talking to each other. And they 18 are expertly doing so because, we have trained them 19 about what their rights are, how to screen other 20 workers, and how to establish the relationship and 21 build the trust that will baring them into our 22 domestic worker-led legal clinic. 23 To my knowledge, it's the only domestic 24 worker-specific legal clinic in the state, and of 25 its kind. 513 1 We -- we have a legal advocacy group that 2 handles the adjudication of the cases. 3 And then we also work closely with the 4 department of labor. 5 So these worker leaders are dubbed 6 "groundbreakers." 7 That means they are breaking ground in areas 8 that enforcement agencies have told us, time and 9 time again, We don't know how to enforce 10 domestic-worker rights because we actually don't 11 know how -- where they, where to talk to them, how 12 to get them to come forward with cases. 13 This is key, when thinking about very severe 14 cases, such as harassment and trafficking, how do we 15 build trust? And what is required in order to 16 actually enforce the laws that we have? 17 Secondly, we work collaboratively with the 18 government agencies, to share our values and vision 19 and alignment; to explore how to leverage our 20 collective resources and mechanisms in order to 21 increase our capacity to bolster enforcements as a 22 system, and not just as an instance. 23 So this happens through our pilot program 24 with the department of labor, to work really closely 25 with them on domestic-worker cases. 514 1 We also have been working really closely over 2 the past three years with the department of consumer 3 affairs, and now dubbed "worker protection," and the 4 division of paid care, to help in -- increase our 5 ability to do collective outreach and 6 co-enforcement, and thinking about different 7 co-enforcement models, like a mediation clinic, as a 8 matter of fact, that they will launching shortly. 9 We've had success in collaborating with -- 10 with the city agencies and with the department of 11 labor. And it also helps us to get a better 12 understanding of the processes itself when it 13 takes -- when workers themselves need to enforce 14 their rights. 15 And then what happens is that, the agencies 16 themselves get a better understanding of domestic 17 workers. 18 When we effectively investigate 19 domestic-worker cases, most of our cases come 20 through our wage-theft violations. And, often, wage 21 theft is the first indicator that there are other 22 workplace violations, such as sexual harassment and 23 discrimination. 24 Yet, because of the severe power differential 25 between employer and employee, and the isolated 515 1 nature of domestic work, the way that the cases are 2 investigated and adjudicated affect whether a worker 3 will be able to divulge more serious violations, 4 such as sexual harassment. 5 It's almost as if those first experiences are 6 really valuable, and for being able -- for a worker 7 to be able to determine if they're gonna come 8 forward with anything that is more severe. 9 And it creates a huge barrier when workers, 10 first of all, don't understand the system, but then 11 are also met with an agency, entity, or an 12 investigator that doesn't understand them as a 13 worker, their work sector, the nuances of domestic 14 work itself, and what makes them so vulnerable. 15 We want to make sure that we're strengthening 16 sector-specific knowledge and protocol for domestic 17 workers in enforcement agencies. 18 So it's key to -- what -- what's key for us, 19 is to helping investigators understand and practice 20 how they work with (indiscernible) situations, and 21 we -- and the way that they gather evidence is fair. 22 Right? 23 For a domestic worker, there is no such thing 24 as a human-resources department. So their avenue to 25 seek and redress is to actually come forward in a 516 1 very -- for them, a very public exposed way. 2 They need to actually engage with some sort 3 of outside entity, like the department of labor. 4 First of all, they would have to figure out 5 how to get to the commission on human rights, or the 6 division of human rights. 7 And, oftentimes, if they're lucky, very 8 lucky, they can find a community-based organization 9 that would help them maneuver that process, or refer 10 them appropriately. 11 And oftentimes, unfortunately, that does not 12 happen. 13 We work specifically towards developing 14 metrics, and measuring the progress in 15 domestic-worker rights enforcement efforts. 16 So, we want to be able to see the patterns 17 of, like, what are the systemic violations, and what 18 are the barriers to making (indiscernible) -- like, 19 enforcement itself successful? 20 So each of the cases that come through, we're 21 just trying to collect as much data as we can, as 22 to: 23 What it took to bring them to our clinic? 24 What is it taking to keep them from dropping 25 off their cases, or, stopping their cases? 517 1 What does it take for them to find a new job 2 afterwards? 3 Right? 4 And so this is all data that we're 5 collecting. 6 Then, how does the process work, so that we 7 can go back to the department of labor, we can go 8 back to, you know, the commission on human rights, 9 and say, Hey, this is what we're seeing, and we need 10 to be able to work together to address these issues. 11 So what we're seeing on the ground for 12 domestic workers is that, even with these strategies 13 in place, continued collaboration with city, state, 14 and community-based organizations and advocates, we 15 know that it still takes a very long time for 16 workers to know whom to turn to, and whom to trust. 17 Domestic workers have a very hard time 18 admitting that their workplace rights have been 19 violated. 20 They have an even harder time sharing 21 accounts of harassment, and continue living with 22 that trauma and fear every day in their current 23 workspaces of past experiences. 24 And we're committed to, like, the complete 25 screening of potential workplace violations, which 518 1 includes sexual harassment, but it's not enough to 2 wait for workers to come forward. 3 I think this is one of the biggest lessons 4 learned around the Domestic Worker Bill of Rights. 5 It's 10 years since it's passed, and the kind of 6 prevailing thought was that, you passed the law, it 7 will get enforced, workers' lives will be better. 8 We actually have to go out into the 9 communities, find the workers, and actively support 10 them through the process and life of their case 11 itself. 12 And then once we do so, we're actively 13 engaging them back into organizing, into 14 community-based group organizations, into our 15 chapters, so that they themselves are able to 16 build -- build their opportunities so that they 17 don't have to go back into the same or similar 18 situations. 19 Right? 20 We find that when some workers are -- have 21 decided to come forward, they do so in relation to a 22 different complaint of workplace violations. It 23 might be a lesser offense. They kind of test the 24 waters. 25 And they do that so they can see how well 519 1 they can trust us, and how well they can trust the 2 support and the process itself. 3 So for domestic workers, it's not -- it's 4 almost never just sexual harassment. That's sort of 5 like added insult to the injury. 6 Unfortunately, while a worker itself has 7 several years, six years, in New York to file a 8 wage-theft complaint, the statute of limitation runs 9 out much sooner for sexual-harassment claims. 10 So, oftentimes, I only counsel workers who 11 will come forward with a claim of harassment, but 12 that claim they cannot pursue, and we would have to 13 figure out if they had some other type of workplace 14 violation that they can actually pursue. 15 Workers themselves need to have time. 16 So, one year is barely enough time for 17 workers to build the stamina and support and 18 understanding of their rights to come forward. But 19 we also know that they require additional time to 20 distance themselves from a job. 21 So, if they are relying on a reference 22 letter, they need to be able to secure their next 23 job, or even the, next, next job, in order to make 24 some kind of a complaint against their previous 25 jobs. 520 1 So one year is not enough for them to do 2 that. 3 We've had to even -- had to advocate the 4 department of labor, that they were -- they were 5 giving us a three-year cutoff date for when 6 wage-theft violations were made. 7 And we had to push them to please give us the 8 six years, because we knew that workers themselves 9 weren't even able to file -- just, these are just 10 stolen wages -- within the three-year time limit 11 that they had -- had put forward recently. 12 So we know that, for domestic workers, 13 one year itself is not nearly enough. 14 We know that, for domestic workers, because 15 they work in the homes, they're highly -- they are 16 highly surveilled. They're afraid to make a phone 17 call to an agency, they're afraid to seek out 18 support. Their hours are very long. 19 And so would need some extra access to be 20 able to call late at night or on weekends, to figure 21 out where could they file a claim. 22 Right? 23 It takes a long time for a worker to take a 24 day off to come in to any of our offices. 25 We hold clinics very late into the night in 521 1 order to be able to accommodate their ability to 2 work their full day, and then come in and make a 3 file -- a claim in the evenings. 4 And that's almost impossible with the 5 department of labor, unless we make a very special 6 kind of request, which we have been able to be do, 7 but, how could that be scalable, how could we make 8 it more accessible, statewide, for domestic workers 9 to be able to access the division of human rights 10 and the department of labor? 11 I cite the department of labor a lot because 12 that's probably the entity that workers would reach 13 first. Right? 14 And so there also needs to be an ability for 15 investigators to appropriately refer workers and 16 screen workers for the different types of violations 17 that they might have. 18 I think what I want to say, really, is that, 19 because domestic workers are so isolated, they work 20 in such intimate settings, and they have to uphold a 21 very high standard of work. Right? These are 22 people who take care of our children, of our 23 elderly, and of our homes themselves, that we need 24 to be able to understand that education itself isn't 25 enough. 522 1 We have laid out some policy requests, and -- 2 in my testimony, and, really, those are addressed 3 towards, like, what is going to -- what is it going 4 to require to support very vulnerable workers to 5 come forward and file claims of harassment? 6 Many workers would lose their home because 7 they are live-in. Many workers would lose their 8 job. 9 And so how could we mitigate a retaliated -- 10 retaliatory actions from an employer? 11 We know that worker centers themselves are 12 the first point of contact for many workers. 13 So how could we bolster that, by funding 14 worker centers as a point of contact for being able 15 to be sort of like a hub for enforcement? 16 And, you know, create funding streams, so 17 that the community centers themselves can 18 effectively do the pre-work that is required to 19 bring cases forward? 20 We would like for the agencies to really 21 consider what it means to do co-enforcement models. 22 I have a lot of visions of what it would look 23 like. 24 I have worker leaders who are currently 25 really good at investigating domestic-worker cases. 523 1 They could be -- they could be actual 2 investigators within the DOL. They could be the 3 navigators. 4 And so, when I'm thinking big, what would it 5 be to really collaborate very closely, creating 6 vulnerable-workforce sectors, especially domestic 7 work, to be able to navigate other workers through 8 the system. 9 And then, lastly, I would ask that we think 10 about creating a task force to explore the 11 feasibility of establishing like a statewide 12 sectoral standards board for domestic workers, that 13 monitors and proactively sets standards for the 14 domestic-worker industry, so that when we set the 15 standards for the industry, we don't have workers 16 that are so vulnerable to issues such as harassment. 17 Really, I want to leave the rest of the time 18 for my colleague Daniela, who is a fierce organizer, 19 mother, domestic worker, and, herself, has a 20 powerful story. 21 But she inspires both myself and other 22 workers to come forward with their stories. 23 Thank you. 24 DANIELA CONTRERAS: Buenos stades. 25 My name is Daniela Contreras. I am the 524 1 organizer at the National Domestic Workers Alliance. 2 I have worked for many years as a domestic 3 worker, and also my family, my mother and my sister. 4 I am the mother of a curious, intelligent, 5 beautiful 6-year-old girl, and I have been 6 undocumented. I am currently a DREAMer. 7 Today I am here to share my story of sexual 8 harassment in the workplace, and how this issue 9 affects the sector in which I organize. 10 Domestic workers have faced a long history of 11 exclusion for basic labor protections. 12 Domestic workers were a specifically excluded 13 from federal labor protections, like minimum wage 14 and the right to organize a union. 15 Many laws, such as anti-discrimination and 16 harassment laws, have also excluded domestic 17 workers, and domestic workers feel the consequences 18 of that. They feel it as disrespect, a lack of 19 dignity in their work. They experience it as wage 20 theft, and not having enough time to take off for -- 21 to take care for their families and their loved 22 ones. 23 We feel unsafe in our jobs, unprotected by 24 our laws. 25 When I was 16 years old, I got a part-time 525 1 job as a nanny, cared for a 3-year-old boy while his 2 parents were at work. I took care of him every day 3 after school, from three to four hours. 4 I was so excited because it meant helping my 5 family financially. 6 My mother at that time was working as a 7 live-in domestic worker, staying with her employer 8 seven days a week, and earning $125 a week. 9 My sister and I were living with my uncle at 10 that time, and she had very little time to spend 11 with us. Her situation was bad. 12 So bring in an additional income went a long 13 way. I felt proud I was making a contribution. At 14 that time, I was undocumented. 15 In my community, there is a lot of fear of 16 seeking help from law enforcement when you're in 17 trouble. 18 I did not know where I could go, and, at the 19 time, had something bad had happened. 20 And while I understood English, I did not 21 feel I could express myself fully in this language 22 at that time. 23 The mother of the child spoke Spanish, and 24 I -- she interviewed me, and provided me with a work 25 agreement. But the husband was a monolingual 526 1 English-speaker. 2 My job required me to be alone with him at 3 home often, and this made me feel very 4 uncomfortable. 5 At 16, the idea of being home with this 6 father alone was uncomfortable, but I felt I was -- 7 it was a job that my family needed me to have. 8 Sorry. 9 The father will come home from work in the 10 late afternoon. He will go straight to shower. 11 At first, he will come out of the shower and 12 walk from the bathroom to his bedroom, wrapped in a 13 towel. 14 But, over time, he started to call me from 15 the bathroom to get a towel for him. I will bring 16 him a towel and leave it at the door. 17 On some days, I would try to be proactive, 18 and leave a towel in the bathroom before he got 19 home, but it continued to escalate. 20 One day he came home from the show -- he came 21 home -- he came out of the shower, into the bedroom, 22 where I was playing with his child. He began to 23 touch me and pull me into the bed, sexually 24 assaulting me, right in front of his child. 25 I felt so vulnerable and defenseless; 527 1 I froze. 2 I was lucky enough, someone knocked on the 3 window. He got distracted, and I was able to run 4 away. 5 It was one of the most terrifying experiences 6 of my life. 7 My employers never called me back; I never 8 got paid. 9 And out of fear, and embarrassment, I kept 10 silent for almost two decades. At that time, I kept 11 wondering, why me? 12 And later I began to wonder about other women 13 who did the work I did, but in houses that were 14 significantly more isolated. 15 What happens to them? 16 This was my first experience with sexual 17 harassment in the workplace, but it wasn't my last. 18 I have had also experienced sexual harassment 19 repeatedly, working at a restaurant, and a deli. 20 In the restaurant, the owner required the 21 women employees to wear super-tight clothes in the 22 winter; and short skirts, and low shirt cut -- 23 low-cut shirts that revealed cleavage, in the 24 summer. 25 He will specifically target me when he was 528 1 around, requesting me to be the server, telling me, 2 he'll like to take me to dinner, and then a hotel. 3 And there verbally abusing me when I ignore his 4 behavior and turn him down. 5 My work -- my co-workers would say nothing, 6 not even the servers who experienced some of the 7 same behavior from him. 8 I was the only worker who stood up to him, 9 and, of course, I got fired. 10 I remember dreading working those long hours 11 where I felt such undignity (sic). 12 I did file a complaint against him in 2005. 13 He hired a lawyer, and working with the 14 manager, put a (indiscernible) counter-story, 15 accusing me of pursuing him. 16 My case was thrown out. 17 Later, I saw the same lawyer recently who 18 worked with him in this response to my complaint, 19 and this lawyer was running for office. 20 It angers me to see how unfair power dynamics 21 work against us to so many women in our society. 22 I experienced similar behavior by the deli 23 owner's son where I also work. 24 One day he called me into his office and told 25 me he wanted me -- to have sex with me. 529 1 I was already older by then, and the 2 experiences from before draw me to want to stop 3 repeating the cycle. 4 I told him, no, that his behavior made me 5 uncomfortable. And if done again, I will report it 6 to the department of labor. 7 It scared him enough to stop his behavior, 8 but that not -- but that's not always the case in 9 our situations. 10 At that time, I knew that the department of 11 labor enforced workers' protections, but I did not 12 know how to find their number or how to access their 13 help. 14 Everyone says, go and take action, but it's 15 difficult to know where to go, and how to go about 16 reporting, and actually changing this situation. 17 Now, as an organizer, every day I hear 18 stories of working women just like me. 19 I moderate several online domestic-worker 20 groups on social media. 21 Recently, I got a call from a house cleaner 22 in Texas. She had gone for an interview, and after 23 the employer drove her home, he attempted to rape 24 her. 25 As she was leaving his car, he threatened 530 1 her, that if she ever mentioned anything, he will 2 come after her, knowing where she lived, and having 3 information about her personal life, from the fake 4 work interview. 5 She call me, crying. We had a deep 6 conversation about what was happening, and, 7 immediately, I contact her with our -- one of our 8 affiliates in Texas, which they give her support and 9 legal advice. 10 Domestic workers have no way of knowing 11 beforehand how safe the workplace is before they are 12 there. They have no one around, often, to witness 13 their experiences or offer them support and 14 protection. 15 Many domestic workers are immigrant women, 16 American women of color. Their families and 17 communities are constantly targeted, separated, 18 (indiscernible) with violence. 19 Our stories can be fully of pain, fear, and 20 violence. 21 When I have posted videos and articles about 22 my firsthand experience of sexual harassment in the 23 workplace to the online domestic workgroups, there's 24 often little to no response, compared to other 25 postings. 531 1 Our communities still struggle to talk about 2 this issue openly. 3 And the only thing I am requesting, it's -- 4 (indiscernible), but what I'm asking is, as Marissa 5 said, we want more protections for domestic workers. 6 I don't know if my daughter's ever gonna do 7 the domestic work. She has seen me doing it. She's 8 very proud about me doing -- being a house cleaner 9 sometimes. 10 But I want my daughter to also know that, 11 wherever she goes, she's going to be safe. 12 We need those protections. 13 SENATOR BIAGGI: Thank you, both, so much. 14 I don't think that -- I don't think that I've 15 heard testimony as compelling as both of you have 16 given to us tonight about domestic workers at any 17 point throughout the entire inquiry of what we have 18 been doing. 19 And, it's incredibly powerful, but that 20 doesn't even really underscore the feeling that 21 I have. 22 Daniela, when you were speaking, my heart was 23 racing in my chest, because I understand what that's 24 like; how normal it is to just let people, and, 25 mainly, in these dynamics, where it's male and 532 1 female, to just allow men to say things to you, or 2 just to touch you, or to touch -- rub your back, or 3 to touch your face. 4 It has happened to me more times than I can 5 even count in my entire life, and, it's not okay, 6 it's unacceptable. 7 And, that behavior is unacceptable in every 8 environment, no matter where we go. 9 And so I think that one of the things that 10 you touched on, that is -- really underscores the 11 beginning of this hearing today, was, you said, 12 "It's difficult to know where to go, or how to go 13 about reporting, and actually changing the 14 situation." 15 That is not by accident. That is on purpose. 16 The way that our systems have been designed 17 have been designed in such a way where only a few 18 people can understand where to go. 19 And even if you understand where to go, it 20 doesn't necessarily mean you'll be heard. 21 And I've seen it up close, and I just find it 22 to be incredibly egregious. 23 And that is why both of you here today, to 24 share your testimony, is important, because I'm 25 actually incredibly impressed that you even knew to 533 1 say, not only "no," which may not be -- may not feel 2 like a big thing, but it's a huge -- a huge 3 statement to make. 4 I didn't say -- start saying no until I was 5 in my late 20s. 6 So, I really -- I'm just -- what I'm really 7 getting at here is, I want to know, how did you know 8 where to go, or that the department of labor was 9 even a place for you to go, at all? 10 How did you find that information out? 11 This is important because -- it's important 12 because, one of the things I feel like that we can 13 do, and one of the things that is a problem, is 14 that, when we pass laws, sometimes people don't even 15 know, or they don't know what their right -- they 16 don't know what their rights are, or where to find 17 their rights. And the information is tucked into a 18 place that, only if you have access to a system can 19 you get the access. 20 So I'm just wondering if you remember how you 21 learned about this information? 22 And what you think we can do to make this 23 information more readily available for everyone. 24 DANIELA CONTRERAS: I -- I have been very 25 involved with my community. I -- I -- if I'm not 534 1 mistaken, I -- when I was younger, right after 2 school, I will go and volunteer at community 3 centers. There's one specific one in Sunset Park, 4 it's called Mikstaka (ph.), and that's where I learn 5 about it. 6 But it was -- I -- I knew there was a place 7 to go, but like I said, where do I find it; what's 8 the address, what's the phone number? 9 That's what happened back then. 10 And -- and now what we're trying to do here, 11 now, differently, and that's the reasons I came on 12 board, and -- to NDWA, is because I want domestic 13 workers to know how to find help. 14 Maybe it's not the department of labor, but 15 they can come to us. 16 We -- pretty much, what we do, we walk 17 around, with these cards, all over the city, where 18 we have our information; social media, phone number. 19 I call them our "domestic workers' 911 phone 20 number." 21 They can call any time. Each one of us take 22 turns on that cell phone. We answer that cell 23 phone, weekend, night. Anytime a domestic worker 24 calls, we answer them. 25 They can leave a voice message in any 535 1 language they feel they're more comfortable. 2 We have these cards, where they -- we tell 3 them about their rights. We try to get their 4 information. And we do follow-up. 5 And whenever we have our monthly meetings, we 6 send home, our workers, our members, with 10 cards 7 each, and they got to bring it back, to make sure. 8 And we also walk around the city with 9 T-shirts, with our phone numbers. 10 Like, we're doing all the way. 11 And, Marissa, she has more. 12 MARISSA SENTENO: I -- no, it's just -- I was 13 remembering back the earlier conversation with the 14 division of human rights, around, like, how do 15 people know how to get to you? 16 So, first of all, a "know your rights" is not 17 an enforcement strategy. Right? Like, that is a 18 piece of an entire broad set of strategies that need 19 to happen in order for workers to -- all workers, 20 and the most vulnerable workers, to be able to come 21 forward, and then, also, you know, go through the 22 process, up. 23 So the strategy is, outreach, education, 24 engagement. 25 And then, when we were thinking about 536 1 "know your rights," what we were finding was that, 2 when I gave just "know your rights" trainings, which 3 were great as one-offs, our trainers were amazing, 4 because they are worker leaders themselves who can 5 engage really actively with the other workers, it 6 can be disempowering because, suddenly, you know how 7 much you have been exploited. 8 But, when we gave this same training embedded 9 in a nanny training, something that they could gain 10 a certificate in, along with other -- other skills, 11 like, how to communicate with your employer, 12 nutrition for children, social-emotional 13 development, and, then, your home is a work -- 14 someone -- your home is -- your home is someone's 15 workplace, and knowing your rights, that was 16 something that they could utilize later; they then 17 knew that they could go and ask for a contract, to 18 make sure that they weren't agreeing to signing away 19 their overtime rights. 20 And then understanding, what does sexual 21 harassment look like? 22 It could look like, and these are, you know, 23 stories from our workers: 24 The man of the house walking around in a 25 towel, wanting to hold, like, a meeting with them, 537 1 and making them feel, like, extremely uncomfortable, 2 day after day. 3 It could look like someone trying to 4 physically advance on somebody. 5 It could look like, saying no, and then also 6 being threatened with your life, because you said 7 "no," and because you told the wife. 8 It runs an entire -- you know, it's a 9 spectrum, and this is what we needed for domestic 10 workers to understand, and they're beginning to 11 understand, that no one should ever be doing 12 anything that makes you feel uncomfortable, 13 regardless of how pervasive or egregious that is. 14 So I think what -- so, yeah, what we actually 15 did was, we held sexual-harassment trainings in 16 conjunction with the commission on human rights, so 17 that they got to meet the people who could possibly 18 help them, right, in a safe space. 19 We've held other sexual-harassment trainings 20 with self-defense classes, so that they could go 21 home with something that makes them feel a little 22 bit more empowered. 23 We showed them the websites. 24 We have been in communication with, actually, 25 the division of human rights, around the -- the new 538 1 requirements. 2 And, most importantly, we're in constant 3 conversation with, and building up, worker leaders, 4 to understand: How are these rights affecting their 5 lives? What are the barriers? 6 They are the experts, so we need to build 7 space for them to voice their expertise, and 8 actually creating the space for them to talk to the 9 other decision-makers directly. Right? They're -- 10 I'm not always the conduit. 11 SENATOR BIAGGI: That's incredibly helpful, 12 and very illuminating. 13 And I have two -- one question, and one 14 comment, just to share information. 15 Do you think that it would be helpful for us 16 to do -- and I mean, "us," in our individual 17 capacities, 'cause, you know, one of the ways that 18 we communicate with our constituents, is we are able 19 to send mailings, home. 20 Now, you know, there's lots of information to 21 send, but perhaps this is one of those areas where 22 I feel like there's not much communication shared. 23 Right? 24 So, it's -- it's a two-way street, so that, 25 we know that -- and that doesn't -- that's not to 539 1 say that our constituents are not domestic workers. 2 But what I'm saying is that, we can have an 3 information that's sent home, that says, Are you -- 4 do you employ a domestic worker, or are you a 5 domestic worker? 6 And have a flip-card, right, that we have -- 7 that we ask either our Senate communications or the 8 Assembly communications to create for us, to send 9 home, to say: 10 Here's what you need to know about this 11 industry, and the rights that these people have. 12 Or, if you're a worker, this is where you 13 need to go. 14 Because, one of the things I know for sure, 15 is that, you know, one of the reasons we know, as -- 16 as citizens, is: You have the right to remain 17 silent. Anything you say can be -- right? 18 We know that because it's become -- it's like 19 pop culture, almost. 20 But so much of what we need to know has to be 21 almost turned into that. 22 And so the fact that you're walking around 23 with these (indiscernible) cards is so important. 24 And to create -- to create more communication 25 around it from all the different areas that can 540 1 possibly be pulled on to share this information is 2 an important way to get this information out. 3 But I want to know if you think that that's a 4 helpful mechanism that we can do, separate and 5 distinct from legislation? 6 MARISSA SENTENO: Yeah, so it is a helpful 7 mechanism. 8 I think, for domestic workers, we are 9 understanding that it's everyone's responsibility to 10 ensure enforcement of our rights: it's workers, it's 11 government, and it's employers. 12 And we are responsible for workers 13 understanding how to enforce their rights. 14 We would like help to -- for employers to 15 understand that they are also, in part -- 16 SENATOR BIAGGI: That's wonderful to hear. 17 So -- but -- so what I'm asking then from 18 both you is, would you help us to create what that 19 communication would look like, so we don't get it 20 wrong -- 21 MARISSA SENTENO: Certainly. 22 SENATOR BIAGGI: -- and we can send that into 23 our districts? 24 MARISSA SENTENO: We have a -- you want to 25 tell them? 541 1 DANIELA CONTRERAS: No, go ahead. 2 MARISSA SENTENO: Okay, all right. 3 Hand in Hand is our sister organization that 4 employ -- that organizes employers, specifically. 5 They have a nice kind of hub in Brooklyn, 6 themselves, and they've been doing some really great 7 outreach. They have some great, like, pamphlets 8 and -- and booklets. 9 So I would love to be able to, like, connect 10 to you all with them. 11 And then they are also, like, all of us in 12 communication together, because, when workers 13 themselves, like, when they put their stamp of 14 approval on it, you're, like, okay, that's going to 15 fly. 16 SENATOR BIAGGI: Right, that's right. 17 That's wonderful. 18 And I'm going to take you the up on that. 19 Are you familiar with the Workplace Project? 20 MARISSA SENTENO: Yes. They are an affiliate 21 of ours. 22 SENATOR BIAGGI: They are? 23 MARISSA SENTENO: Uh-huh. 24 SENATOR BIAGGI: Oh, okay. 25 Jennifer Gordon, who their -- is the 542 1 professor from Fordham Law School, was my 2 immigration law professor. So, her work in this 3 area has been -- 4 MARISSA SENTENO: Yes. 5 SENATOR BIAGGI: -- transformational. 6 MARISSA SENTENO: Yes, absolutely. 7 SENATOR BIAGGI: And I'm glad that you're 8 working all together, but not surprising at all. 9 MARISSA SENTENO: Yes. 10 SENATOR BIAGGI: Thank you. 11 MARISSA SENTENO: Thank you. 12 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Thank you both for your 13 testimony. 14 Daniela, (speaking Spanish). 15 For those of you who are 16 bilingually-challenged, I just said, she's amazing. 17 I'm really taken aback on this, on a couple 18 of fronts. 19 Number one: I grew up in a household, a 20 family, where most of my aunts worked as domestic 21 workers; some of them still do. And, we've heard 22 their stories, nothing to the extent of which you 23 shared. 24 But I could imagine, you know, how common 25 those stories must be. 543 1 And, what's really interesting, we've talked 2 a lot all day about the intersectionality of all of 3 these different categories that can impact a 4 particular victim; so whether it's race, gender, 5 sexual orientation... you name it. 6 In your cases, also, that added dilemma of 7 status, and the fact that that can be used. 8 We currently have legislation on the floor, 9 on third reading, to protect undocumented workers 10 from being threatened with referrals to ICE by 11 employers. 12 We have another bill that arises out of your 13 efforts, I believe years ago, with the bill of 14 rights, and working with Keith Wright, at the time 15 was the chair of the Labor Committee. 16 And there's a bill on third reading now, that 17 would also lower the threshold for eligibility for 18 domestic workers to get disability benefits. 19 And we're going to continue to go down this 20 field. 21 You -- on the labor front of your industry 22 there's is a lot of work to be done. 23 And we -- you have my commitment to dive into 24 these issues, and to be a partner every step of the 25 way as we strengthen that. 544 1 But just sort of keeping a focus on sexual 2 harassment and complaints: 3 So, how many domestic workers are there in 4 the state of New York, that you're aware of? 5 MARISSA SENTENO: So the last best guess, 6 which is from research in 2010, which isn't good 7 enough, it's 200,000, 250,000, domestic workers. 8 Now, we believe that to be much higher 9 because Hand in Hand actually did a more recent 10 survey of how many employers of domestic workers 11 there are. And that number was much higher. It was 12 around 2 million. 13 So, we're looking at -- 14 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: So somewhere between 15 200,000 and 2 million. 16 MARISSA SENTENO: Yeah, 2 million, exactly. 17 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: And, the vast majority 18 of them don't have an agency intermediary? 19 In other words -- 20 MARISSA SENTENO: No. 21 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: -- these are individuals 22 who make direct arrangements with the owners of the 23 household -- 24 MARISSA SENTENO: Right. 25 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: -- for, whatever that 545 1 service. 2 MARISSA SENTENO: These are direct employees 3 of -- right, who would be like the household itself. 4 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: So for -- for legal 5 purposes, they are considered independent 6 contractors? 7 MARISSA SENTENO: No, they are -- they are 8 employees. 9 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Employees? 10 MARISSA SENTENO: Yes. 11 That's a very common misconception, and so 12 many workers themselves get misclassified because of 13 it, but they are employees. 14 So, child-care workers, almost all, 15 exclusively, employees. 16 Caregivers, also employees. 17 House cleaners, mostly all of them are 18 employees, except for the situations where they 19 themselves are running their own, like, cleaning 20 business. And they are also particularly vulnerable 21 because of that sort of, like, misunderstanding and 22 gray area, even amongst themselves. 23 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: So if you are a 24 cleaner -- house cleaner, but you work -- you get 25 assigned a job, and you could be assigned to 546 1 different households, on a given schedule, because 2 another individual is running an actual cleaning 3 business, you're an employee of the business, in 4 that case, not the household you're cleaning? 5 MARISSA SENTENO: Right. If there is like 6 a -- sometimes they call them, like, "scheduler" -- 7 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Yes. 8 MARISSA SENTENO: -- and of that business. 9 By and large, though, they're -- they're -- 10 most house cleaners are direct employees of, like -- 11 they make that arrangement with the -- with the 12 employer, with the homeowner. 13 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: So -- 14 MARISSA SENTENO: (Indiscernible 15 cross-talking) -- 16 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: -- right now, the remedy 17 for filing a case would be the division of human 18 rights? 19 MARISSA SENTENO: Division of human rights. 20 And then, currently, if you live in New York 21 City, the commission on human rights. 22 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: And then, in cases 23 you've seen, we've talked a lot about this current 24 standard of "severe or pervasive," how does a 25 domestic worker, how do you, Daniela, if you would 547 1 have brought that case forward, prove any of what 2 happened? 3 DANIELA CONTRERAS: I wouldn't have any 4 proof. Just my word. 5 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: There's no co-worker to 6 go to the witness? There's no -- 7 DANIELA CONTRERAS: I had the baby, but, he 8 was a 3-year-old. So, no one else. 9 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: I'm just curious, did 10 you ever confront -- 11 DANIELA CONTRERAS: No. 12 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: -- his wife? 13 DANIELA CONTRERAS: Never. 14 Never went back, did not care -- well, it's 15 not that I didn't care. I was afraid. My status 16 was one thing. Language was another. 17 And, what was I supposed to do? 18 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Right, right. 19 MARISSA SENTENO: I know of two instances 20 where workers have confronted the other partner. 21 One was met with very severe aggression. 22 The other was met with severe retaliation, 23 like, blacklisting the worker. 24 And, yes, you're right, it is very difficult 25 to prove, because they're the only people in the 548 1 house. 2 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Again, I'm really 3 interested in following up, and having more 4 conversations, and figuring out how we can work 5 together, through the committee, to do more work 6 around protections for -- you know, just, in 7 general. 8 MARISSA SENTENO: Absolutely. 9 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: But I really want to 10 commend you, the work you are describing, and what 11 you are doing, to empower colleagues in this field, 12 is remarkable. 13 (Speaking Spanish.) 14 Thank you for doing that. 15 Assemblywoman Simotas. 16 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMOTAS: Marissa, Daniela, 17 thank you for opening our eyes. 18 I understand that harassment, any kind of 19 harassment, especially sexual harassment, it's about 20 a power dynamic. It's about, an employer, or 21 somebody who's a supervisor, who is in a position of 22 power, who is taking advantage of an employee, 23 because, sometimes, because they can. 24 And, I think your testimony today, very 25 pointed testimony, really highlights that. 549 1 Daniela, you really established that with 2 your example of what happened to you; that, you were 3 taken advantage of, just because, you were 4 somebody -- there was somebody who felt that they 5 were in power over you. 6 With that, you know, I agree with you, 7 Marissa, that we have to take steps and provide 8 resources, to allow people, especially when they're 9 economically disadvantaged, to come forward. 10 So, in addition to changing our statute of 11 limitations to extending the time, what other 12 resources can we as a state provide to workers who 13 may not have the economic ability to just quit their 14 job and move on, and, you know, find a lawyer or 15 file a complaint? 16 What can we do? 17 MARISSA SENTENO: So funding for legal-aid 18 services, especially those that deal with the most 19 vulnerable workplace populations. 20 I have been working with day laborers and 21 domestic workers for over 15-plus years. It is the 22 hardest thing to find legal advocates, lawyers, that 23 specialize in worker-rights protections, and then 24 also have experience in harassment itself. 25 So funding more money into those really key 550 1 legal services, service providers, and then also the 2 community-based groups that specialize in working 3 with the most vulnerable workplace populations, like 4 domestic workers, is really key. 5 Mental-health services as well. 6 I know that New York City is trying to kind 7 of expand, but we know that, you know, domestic 8 workers are statewide. Right? 9 I worked in Westchester for many years. 10 And so we see that, New York City workers, we 11 can at least get to the park and talk to them. 12 Workers in Westchester, Long Island, and then 13 further up north, so much more isolated. 14 So the onus is on us to really be able to get 15 out into a lot of different types of communities, 16 and to be able to provide, you know, mental-health 17 services, health services itself, to just women of 18 color, low-wage workers. 19 And then emergency-housing funding for 20 especially domestic workers who are live-in. 21 I don't know how many times I've had workers 22 just result homeless because of what happened on the 23 job. 24 That's a really big factor for women coming 25 forward in the domestic workplace. 551 1 And then thinking about, really, like, how to 2 create a framework of support, because the one 3 avenue, enforcement, needs to do its thing. But 4 then there also needs to be the support for workers 5 to be able to heal and move on, as well as kind of 6 rebuild their career opportunities, and move on from 7 that. 8 And then -- so we do part of that through the 9 organizing, but we know that we are severely 10 lacking. Right? 11 For the few cases that come forward with 12 sexual harassment, like, it breaks my -- it doesn't 13 just break my heart, but it makes you weary, trying 14 to provide things that, you know, I got to like pull 15 out of thin air, or something. 16 And that shouldn't really be the case, at 17 all. 18 And if there were like a statewide, also, 19 like guide of resources, like, verified resources, 20 around, like, where do people go for different types 21 of situations. 22 You know, oftentimes we work in this, like, 23 loose network of, like, who do I know, like, I can 24 call when I have a certain type of issue? 25 But that really shouldn't be the case either. 552 1 Right? 2 It should be more formalized, so that we can 3 have like a better connected network system for the 4 most vulnerable workers. 5 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMOTAS: And I have one more 6 question. 7 Clearly, many domestic workers may not -- 8 English might not be their primary language. 9 How do we make it easier for domestic workers 10 to report problems when they face them? 11 Obviously, we have to educate them about the 12 law. But maybe putting them -- maybe the State 13 actually advertising, or putting notices in 14 foreign-language newspapers. 15 I'm just thinking outside of the box. 16 I mean, we really have to make them feel 17 comfortable with reporting these incidences. 18 Do you have any thoughts on that? 19 MARISSA SENTENO: Yeah, that's why we've 20 invested worker leaders. 21 I mean, Daniela was my first cohort of worker 22 leader. Like, she came part-time, learning about 23 her rights. Is bilingual. 24 I've had teams of, like, four or five who 25 will, spoke between them, like, eight different 553 1 languages. 2 So when we invest in community members who 3 are really motivated to be liaisons, navigators, 4 within the community, they themselves have -- you 5 know, increase the language capacity for, like, our 6 small entity. And then you'd be surprised how many 7 people they can talk to. 8 This past year I've had a team of three, 9 between, like, four different languages. And they 10 spoke into over 1,000 workers in this, you know, 11 past summer. 12 And that's -- for us, was quite -- quite an 13 influx of contacts. But then we're able to bring 14 forward 100-plus -- no, 150-plus cases, when, 15 before, it was, like, you know, five cases. 16 So I know that when we invest in people in 17 the community, that can go out into the community 18 and have like the language access themselves. 19 And then of the materials that we use, it's 20 always, we have them -- we actually utilize the City 21 a lot. 22 I would commend the City in being able to 23 provide us a lot of access to different languages, 24 in -- and they have like a really excellent, like, 25 bill-of-rights booklet. 554 1 If you haven't seen it, track it down. 2 It's really good, because it starts the 3 conversation, and then it's in -- and it's in many 4 languages. 5 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMOTAS: And just so that 6 I can clarify the record, our first step has to be, 7 to make sure that our state human rights law covers 8 domestic workers. 9 MARISSA SENTENO: Absolutely. 10 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMOTAS: And places of 11 employment that, you know, could just be one person, 12 or two people, like, not -- it doesn't have to be 13 more than four. Correct? 14 MARISSA SENTENO: Uh-huh. Absolutely. 15 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMOTAS: Thank you very much. 16 MARISSA SENTENO: Thank you. 17 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Assemblywoman Niou. 18 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: Hi. Thank you so much 19 for your testimony. 20 I think that it was really, really powerful 21 to hear. 22 And I -- I -- I agree with Chair Biaggi, 23 because there are so many incidences, that it's, 24 like, you can't even count them. 25 You can't even count them; it happens to 555 1 women daily. 2 And your testimony really, I think, shined a 3 light on that. 4 And I just want to clarify, I don't think 5 that anyone meant to say anything like -- that might 6 sound like that, but, you don't have to confront 7 anyone. You don't -- you don't have to do anything. 8 You don't have to do anything that you're 9 uncomfortable with. 10 I just wanted to clarify that for folks, 11 because, I think that so many of us go through so 12 many situations, where it's enough to just get out 13 of a situation safely, and to walk away unscathed. 14 I don't -- I just want to clarify that, 15 there's nothing wrong with how anybody reacts to any 16 situation that is sexually violent, or, violent, in 17 any circumstance. 18 I -- I -- I know that there's a lot of laws 19 on the books. 20 We just also talked about taxi drivers, we 21 talked about bus drivers, we've talked about 22 hospital personnel, and, folks who assault or harass 23 these folks, they have a particular protection, you 24 know, because we all know that -- and I remember 25 working on this with Assemblymember Ron Kim, that, 556 1 you know, taxi drivers, they're put in the specific 2 situation, just like domestic workers are. 3 Taxi drivers, though, are put in specific 4 situation where they have the drive people anywhere, 5 and they have a roll of cash on them. So people 6 will assault them, to get the money, or, you know, 7 they think that they can just drive them somewhere, 8 and then they'll put them in a dark place, or 9 something, and do something to them. 10 But most of these are -- protections are -- 11 I've just kind of realized in my head, that many of 12 them are regarding men, positions that -- you know, 13 that they deserve these special protections 14 because -- and -- and the higher protection, because 15 of the position that they're in, they're public 16 employees, like, if they're working for the MTA, 17 et cetera. 18 But, what if there is something that is also 19 protecting domestic workers like that, is that 20 something that would be helpful, to say that 21 they're -- it's a felony to attack your -- your 22 employee? 23 I don't know. 24 MARISSA SENTENO: That would be great. I'm 25 like... 557 1 I would say, first of all, because we're a 2 member organization, that's something that we would 3 ask specifically, like, our members: What would it 4 take for them to feel protected? What would it 5 take? 6 We do know that, what it takes for them to 7 feel a little bit more -- the power differential is 8 so high, so, for them to feel a little bit more of a 9 level playing field, is that, when there are 10 contracts. 11 And so, you know, we would love to put 12 forward that notice of rights, and, contracts be 13 mandated for domestic workers and employers, because 14 at least, that way, there is, first of all, a level 15 of understanding between the two, and it needs to be 16 in the language that the workers themselves speak. 17 This all goes to, also, agency employee -- 18 employee -- ack, sorry -- employment agencies -- 19 it's been a long day -- as well, so that people -- 20 what happens is, especially for employment agencies, 21 for newly-arrived immigrant communities, it's sort 22 of, like, where they go to first, and then are 23 shipped off into these far-away suburbs, where they 24 may not have contact with other people outside of 25 their specific community for, like, several years, 558 1 until they've built up enough capital for 2 themselves, to kind of, like, move on to different 3 jobs. 4 And then for -- between domestic 5 worker-employer unit, the household, contracts help 6 them have a better understanding. 7 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: That's great. 8 I mean, I think that what you just said is so 9 key. 10 Like, if you want to ask your members, like, 11 if there's anything that you think that would be -- 12 you know, "How would you feel safe?" I think that's 13 a great question. 14 And I would love to be able to hear -- 15 MARISSA SENTENO: Sure. 16 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: -- the answers for that 17 question, because I think that, you know -- I don't 18 want to hear these testimonies again. I don't what 19 to hear -- I don't want to hear this. 20 MARISSA SENTENO: We're designing a survey 21 for New York City domestic worker, employers. We're 22 hoping to launch it this fall, training workers this 23 summer, to be surveyors themselves. 24 And, yeah, and these are the things that we 25 asked them. Like, what will it take for you to 559 1 feel, heard, respected, and honored at your work? 2 And so, actually, I'll go back to the survey 3 and see if there's something of that component. 4 ASSEMBLYWOMAN NIOU: That would be great. 5 I love it. 6 Thank you so much. 7 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Two more questions. 8 Do you have an app? 9 DANIELA CONTRERAS: An app? 10 MARISSA SENTENO: Okay, so we don't have -- 11 we have a Facebook. All of the "grams," right, 12 Twitters. 13 We also an app for portable benefits. It's 14 called "Alia." And that's specific to trying to 15 address how house care -- house cleaners themselves 16 are not able to gain access to certain types of 17 benefits. 18 But, an app for, like, worker rights, the 19 last one I saw was like the -- has you all heard 20 about the (indiscernible) app? 21 So I'm not sure if -- like, what -- what 22 you're getting at. 23 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: And do you provide, or 24 do you also assist, domestic workers with template 25 contracts? 560 1 MARISSA SENTENO: Yeah, we do have template 2 contracts. 3 We would love for that to be something the 4 State could help provide template contracts for the 5 different, like, work sectors, so that employers had 6 like a trusted place to go, some guidance. 7 And, you all would be like a trusted entity, 8 and be, like, okay, if I have a house cleaner, this 9 is what a general contract should look like. 10 Currently, our contracts are mostly geared 11 towards nannies. 12 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Okay. There's a lot 13 more questions, but we'll do a follow-up. 14 I appreciate your time and your testimony. 15 Thank you. 16 MARISSA SENTENO: Thank you. 17 DANIELA CONTRERAS: Thank you. 18 SENATOR BIAGGI: Thank you so much. 19 Next we are going to hear from 20 Cynthia Lowney, Marie Tooker, and Christine Reardon. 21 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Thank you. You can 22 begin. 23 CYNTHIA LOWNEY, ESQ.: Okay. 24 My name is Cynthia Lowney. 25 I'd like to say thank you, good evening, and 561 1 I'm glad that you waited to hear what we had to say. 2 Good evening, as I said, Senators, 3 Assemblymembers, staffers, and all. 4 Thank you for holding and attending this 5 joint New York State Senate and Assembly public 6 hearing to examine sexual harassment in the 7 workplace. 8 I believe that both the definition and the 9 venue should be extended and broadened. 10 "Sexual" should also include gender and 11 racial harassment, and "workplace" should include 12 interviews, social and/or work-related events, 13 volunteer work, et cetera. 14 Hostile work environments need to be 15 eradicated by the compliance and the enforcement of 16 rules, regulations, and laws that are already in 17 existence, in a timely manner, and refined by 18 updates when necessary. 19 "Sexual harassment" can be defined in a 20 myriad of ways. 21 The usual definitions includes unwanted or 22 unwelcomed sexual remarks or physical advances in a 23 workplace or other professional and social 24 situations. 25 It includes: 562 1 Making offensive remarks about women in 2 general, as well as offensive suggestions and/or 3 photos; 4 Giving gifts of a sexual nature; 5 Repeatedly asking another to socialize when 6 given a negative response, especially if it's a 7 supervisor; 8 Verbal abuse of a sexual nature, touching, 9 grabbing, repeatedly too close, or brushing up 10 against a person by a superior, even from another 11 area or unit, a co-worker, a client, a customer; 12 Sexual pranks, teasing, singing love songs in 13 the workplace, telling events of jokes of a sexual 14 nature, innuendos, in person, by e-mail, phone, or 15 other social media. 16 People need to know the definition, and that 17 is precisely why education and training are 18 imperative, and not just in the workplace. 19 Unwelcomed conduct unreasonably interferes 20 with and/or intimidates one to do work performance, 21 and, it can create an unhealthy, hostile, or abusive 22 work environment. 23 Giving promotions, awards, training, or other 24 job benefits to another who reluctantly accepts, or, 25 may even want unwelcomed activity if that means you 563 1 get a promotion, anything like this of a sexual 2 nature is wrong. 3 And, notably, the harasser can be of the 4 gender, race, or religion. 5 Education. 6 One needs to know the definition of "sexual 7 harassment," which I believe needs to be expanded to 8 the gender, racial, and harassment of people because 9 of their religion, so that others can better 10 understand the entire component involved. 11 We must the expand the definition, and 12 acknowledge a behavior, give it a name, so that 13 people know, understand, and accept it as 14 egregiously wrong; not just something like, "Oh, 15 what a nice outfit you're wearing," or, "You look 16 great today," which a lot of people have 17 sarcastically, or perhaps they believe, has to do 18 with sexual harassment, when there are no added 19 actions or motions. 20 False accusations are yet another problem 21 that must be addressed. 22 Because of a lack of education on topics or a 23 misunderstanding, one might file a complaint that is 24 inappropriate or false. 25 The target can also have longstanding 564 1 negative effects as to his or her career. 2 When so few know what it is, how can 3 businesses, organizations, and government entities 4 instill effective policies? 5 Similarly, without education, how would 6 parents, relatives, teachers, coaches, mentors, 7 neighbors, and all, know what could and should be 8 done, or what should be reported? 9 Why don't people speak out? 10 "Those who are aggrieved keep silent for fear 11 of retaliation: firing, being blackballed," as 12 Anita Hill said in 1991, when asked why she had not 13 come forward about the sexual harassment towards her 14 by Clarence Thomas, when she was subpoenaed for 15 testimony during his U.S. Supreme Court hearing. 16 "Was some of a kind of subliminal repercussions, 17 being labeled as a 'rat,' 'a snitch,' failing to 18 adhere to the 'boys' club' mantra, or being denied 19 promotions." 20 For sure, Professor Anita Hill was 21 criticized. 22 In her career, while successful in some 23 limited ways, was negatively affected, while 24 Clarence Thomas is still a U.S. Supreme Court judge. 25 Former New York State Governor Mario Cuomo 565 1 had an executive order issued in the early 1990s, 2 that forbid New York State employees from acting, 3 ignoring, encouraging, condoning, excusing, sexual 4 harassment. 5 That executive order did not curtail the 6 rampant gender and racial discrimination that 7 persisted in the New York State Department of Labor. 8 My specific reason for submitting 9 this testimony is because, after I heard 10 Professor Anita Hill's testimony in 1991, I was a 11 New York State Department of Labor administrative 12 law judge in Brooklyn, New York. 13 I was one of 21 administrative law judges 14 hired in '91 to '92, because the New York State 15 Department of Labor was required to hire women and 16 minorities, since over 90 percent of the judges were 17 White males. 18 From the onset, the instances of gender, 19 racial, and sexual harassment and discrimination 20 were rampant. 21 When we attended a training session in 22 Albany, New York, in December 1991, it was the first 23 time, after working since March of that year, that 24 the ALJs had a social interaction after the daytime 25 courses. 566 1 It was then that we realized the illegal 2 behavior was beyond outrageous, as there was a 3 hospitality room; a bedroom converted to an 4 opportunity to have liquor and speak with the other 5 ALJs, including supervisors and the executive 6 director, all of whom were White males. 7 Within moments, we witnessed one of only 8 three ALJs hired prior to our hiring, kissing a few 9 supervisory judges and posing for photos with them. 10 Most of us were newer ALJs, and we left 11 quietly without saying anything to those who 12 remained. 13 We then began to relay what other gender, 14 racial, and religious harassment and discrimination 15 had occurred to us in our isolated cubicles. 16 Because most of us had a 30-minute lunch 17 period, and had to travel from under the 18 Brooklyn Bridge, on a van, to downtown Brooklyn to 19 obtain our lunch, our conversations were extremely 20 limited, since we wrote appellate divisions. 21 I had public contact because I was one of two 22 ALJs chosen to do special hearings, since I had been 23 an ALJ at another New York State entity prior to 24 going to the department of labor. 25 When we arrived back at work the following 567 1 workday, which was a Monday, we were somewhat 2 shocked, but totally dismayed, to see photos of the 3 female ALJ, and the supervisors kissing her, posted 4 by our main mailboxes. 5 Subsequently, armed with knowledge that there 6 was a serious problem, we contacted our union, the 7 Public Employees Federation, and spoke with our 8 representative. 9 All of we new hires were provisional, and the 10 New York State Department of Labor would not give us 11 a test; therefore, most were afraid to file a 12 grievance or complaint. 13 Fear of losing a job was prominent; however, 14 without civil-service protection, and being on 15 probation, even if hired by a test, allowed these 16 few White males in a powerful position to persist 17 with their antics of harassment and/or 18 discrimination, and what we later learned was their 19 way to encourage us to leave our jobs. 20 When a few of us contacted the employee 21 assistance program and/or the office of equal 22 opportunity at the department of labor, an explosion 23 of interrogations, and more retaliation, occurred. 24 The EAP counselor I consulted violated my 25 privacy by reporting what I said to the OEO office 568 1 without asking for my permission, or telling me that 2 she did so. 3 Another ALJ went to OEO about racial and 4 gender discrimination against her. 5 When the chief ALJ got a message from OEO 6 that a female ALJ had complained, and he wanted to 7 talk to him, I was called into his office because he 8 assumed that I was the one that went to OEO, and he 9 interrogated me for over an hour, without a witness 10 for me, while he had a witness. 11 When I asked for union representation, he 12 told, that if I wanted to leave his office, he would 13 write me up for insubordination. 14 I stayed. 15 While I filed a PEF grievance about unfair 16 and unequal treatment, and won a $1,000 award, the 17 rampant treatment and retaliation I suffered was 18 outrageous. 19 On one occasion, the chief ALJ and executive 20 director insisted that I stay after work for them to 21 review 25 of my cases at once. 22 The norm was, for a senior ALJ, to review one 23 at a time, and simply send back any recommendation 24 or changes. 25 Before my one-year anniversary at the job, 569 1 and, without even one formal review of my work, 2 I was terminated, along with the minority female who 3 had gone to OEO. 4 It was blatant retaliation, and was a message 5 to all others that, if they dared to report 6 anything, they too would lose their positions. 7 Even though I won the grievance, the DOL 8 never investigated my complaint that violated the 9 PEF contract. 10 Both the other ALJ and I filed outside 11 complaints of harassment, discrimination, and/or 12 retaliation. 13 I filed my complaint with the U.S. EEOC 14 because I did not want a New York State entity 15 reviewing a sister-brother unit. 16 Unfortunately, the EEOC transferred my case 17 to the State Division of Human Rights in New York, 18 without consulting me or obtaining my permission, 19 because EEOC's backlog at that time was 10 years. 20 That's not a typo. 21 And that was in 1992. 22 I contacted our family friend, 23 Senator John Markey, who was able to have our 24 immediate termination letter revised to include 25 two weeks' notice. 570 1 The governor's office was notified, and his 2 governor's office of employee relations was notified 3 as well. 4 However, while Senator Markey's office had 5 intended to assist us more vigorously, he was 6 hospitalized to undergo emergency surgery, and, we 7 were just without work. 8 A New York State DOL attorney from Buffalo 9 interviewed me in the summer of 1992, and 10 recommended that I be reinstated; she told me so. 11 However, the chief judge did not make that 12 recommendation; I was not reinstated. 13 After months of no job prospects as an 14 attorney, I was hired by the PEF regional director, 15 Bob Jackson, now a New York State Senator, to fill 16 in as a union rep for a woman on maternity leave. 17 A PEF union grievance was filed on behalf of 18 other ALJs, since none would dare sign their name on 19 it for fear of termination. 20 And when the test was given, both the other 21 ALG who was terminated the same day as me, and I, 22 both scored 100, and we were ranked Number 1. 23 But Number 27, a White male, was hired. 24 Because I was a single mother of two, unable 25 to obtain a position with sufficient income, I had 571 1 to cash in any pension moneys that I had in the 2 New York State Retirement System. 3 I had an income execution order for child 4 support because of non-compliance after a divorce, 5 but it was unenforceable, since I was able to 6 hire -- unable to hire a person to determine the 7 whereabouts of my children's father after he left 8 New York State. 9 My financial woes continued because of the 10 State Division of Human Rights' backlog. Their move 11 to another location, and letters not to contact 12 them, because they were busy with other cases. 13 My probable-cause hearing that was supposed 14 to occur in 90 days, according to the executive law 15 in New York State, took 4 years. 16 I had the probable-cause hearing in 1996, 17 along with the other ALJ who was terminated the same 18 day as me in April of '92. 19 I won my hearing, and the DOL appealed it. 20 I won the appeal, which meant that it 21 would -- I would be entitled to a public hearing, 22 or, I could proceed in federal court. 23 Both the other ALJ, and many others that were 24 subsequently fired before the test results had come 25 out, we could not get an attorney to represent us on 572 1 any kind of a contingency. They wanted $10,000 from 2 each of us. And I was making way under 40,000 at 3 the time. And like I said, I had two kids. 4 I could not afford that substantial retainer 5 for a private attorney, and, therefore, I could go 6 to federal court. 7 No not-for-profit would take my case because 8 they knew backlogs meant lots of paperwork, lots of 9 time; no money. 10 I had a rely on the State Division of Human 11 Rights. They would only represent my complaint, but 12 not me personally, whatever that meant. 13 I never had a public hearing for several more 14 years. All that while I took what I called 15 "survival jobs," and, often, that meant two or 16 three jobs at a time, including many without 17 medical, dental, prescription, optical benefits, or 18 vacation, sick, personal days, and some with 19 minimum-wage salaries. 20 At the same time, I had to hope for a 21 hearing; but, instead, attended various conferences 22 with the State Division of Human Rights, on little 23 notice to my employers for a day off from work, 24 often without pay, because the positions were 25 temporary, provisional, 1099, or seasonal, and 573 1 travel to State Division of Human Rights' offices in 2 Harlem, Hauppauge, Brooklyn, and The Bronx. 3 Neither the attorney for the DOL, nor the 4 attorney for the State Division of Human Rights 5 considered my loss of work every time they 6 postponed, failed, agreed to adjournments, or they 7 failed to produce documents or were unprepared. 8 Even presiding ALJ -- even ALJ -- I'm sorry. 9 Even presiding ALJ demands that the DOL be 10 prepared and show up with files was ignored. 11 Most corporations, not-for-profits, and 12 others enter into negotiations when it's a case of 13 the State Division of Human Rights, because they 14 want to expedite all and reduce legal fees, costs, 15 et cetera. 16 Government entities do not consider costs, 17 since attorneys who handle the cases do not suffer 18 any consequence if they lose a case, and they don't 19 get a raise if they win. 20 The incentive to work earnestly sometime 21 lands in the laps of those who would agree to serial 22 adjournments by their adversaries. 23 Accountability as to timeliness, 24 sufficiencies, was not a priority. In fact, I never 25 met -- in all those years, 15 years in the end, I 574 1 never met the general counsel or the commissioners 2 that were appointed over that entire experience. 3 My public hearing took 38 days of testimony 4 over 18 months. 5 Both the DOL and State Division of Human 6 Rights' attorneys were required to file briefs, but 7 neither of them ever did that. 8 The State Division of Human Rights' attorney 9 failed to file a brief after several months of 10 extensions, and work was done by me most of the 11 time. 12 She notified both the ALJ, who presided over 13 the hearing, and me, the Friday before the brief was 14 due on that following Monday, after months of 15 extensions, ergo, I put together a brief, without a 16 library, on 48 hours' notice, hoping the ALJ would 17 accept it. 18 The DOL attorney who was at the hearing for 19 those 18 months left the DOL, and another attorney 20 not familiar with the case, allegedly, filed a 21 brief, but I never got a copy of it. 22 15 years later, after I filed my 1992 23 complaint, I received -- 24 And by the way, there was a typo there. It 25 should say '92, not '96. 575 1 -- I received a winning recommendation for 2 back pay, minus what I did make, plus 9 percent 3 interest, 50,000 in compensatory damages, and 4 immediate reinstatement. 5 That would have been almost 500,000 for those 6 15 years. 7 Both the DOA and, shockingly, the State 8 Division of Human Rights, objected to my win. 9 I anticipated that the DOL would object; 10 however, it was beyond astonishing that the 11 State Division of Human Rights objected. 12 Since the attorney had not been prepared, 13 I did almost all the questions to the various 14 witnesses whose names I gave to her. 15 I had to Xerox all for her when she received 16 papers from the DOL at a hearing, while she got her 17 lunch. 18 Apparently, her boss, the general counsel, 19 Gina Lopez Summer, was undergoing New York State 20 confirmation to become a New York State Court of 21 Claims judge when that decision came out, and the 22 award, as given, would have publicly exposed the 23 inefficiency at the State Division of Human Rights 24 under her supervision, and that would have caused, 25 you know, major harm, stress, et cetera, to her, but 576 1 it also cost me lots of that as well. 2 Taxpayers would have been outraged if they 3 saw the amounts of money that I won, based on a 4 9 percent interest rate for the difference in the 5 salaries that I made and the salaries that I would 6 have had, to say nothing about pension again. 7 A new commissioner was appointed, and that 8 meant more delays. 9 Gina Lopez Summer was approved by the 10 New York State Senate, and the new commissioner 11 handed me a decision and order, that included 12 $100,000 in compensatory damages, but only one year 13 of back pay, plus interest, because I was a 14 provisional appointee. 15 She did not consider that I took, passed, and 16 scored Number 1 on the civil service exam, and was 17 never interviewed or hired, and that an associate 18 commissioner at the New York State Department of 19 Labor testified at my hearing, that they skipped 20 over the several of us, the terminated judges, 21 because they thought they could do so. 22 Bottom line: 23 After an appeal, I got zero, because the 24 New York State Department of Labor hired outside 25 counsel and filed two affidavits: 577 1 One, that the person who accepted service 2 from my process server, with me by his side, was not 3 authorized to accept the papers, which was not true; 4 And, two, that the only place to serve legal 5 papers was in Albany, as indicated by an internal 6 memo, albeit not available to the public. 7 Suggestions and recommendations that I would 8 give: 9 1. Expand the definition of "sexual 10 harassment" to include gender, racial, and religious 11 harassment and discrimination. 12 2. Mandate education, beginning in 13 elementary and high schools, with resources and 14 teachers who are well trained in those areas, 15 because workplace harassment, discrimination, is the 16 result of one's environment: their home, their 17 family, their school, their neighborhood; religious, 18 social, and ethnic background; plus, TV social 19 media, et cetera. 20 For sure, the double check mark of hiring 21 only those who fit two categories of 22 underrepresented groups eliminates hiring those of 23 certain genders, ethnic, religious, and/or racial 24 backgrounds, who need to find others with whom they 25 can have trust, confide in, et cetera. 578 1 3. Provide training, education, for parents, 2 families, workers who may not be organized of 3 their -- I'm sorry -- may not be cognizant of their 4 own prejudices, behavior, and its effect on others. 5 We must go to the sources that is the root of 6 the problem. 7 4. The current rules, regulations, and law 8 must be complied with, and enforced timely, by not 9 just corporations who often settle with 10 non-disclosure agreements, thereby allowing the 11 predators to remain in their jobs, while the person 12 reporting is giving money, and may not realize that 13 explaining why they left a position is, in essence, 14 not true, when an employer agrees that the reason 15 for leaving is something other than the egregious 16 behavior, or that their career is ruined because 17 they did report; but, also, by way of government 18 entities, not-for-profits, per diems, household 19 workers, store clerks, waiters, waitresses, actors, 20 actresses, tutors, coaches, and more. 21 Justice delayed is justice denied. 22 5. Discussing the issue goes back centuries. 23 Professor Anita Hill; U.S. Supreme Court 24 Judge Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who graduated, top of her 25 class; couldn't get a job as a lawyer. Go teach. 579 1 The Women's Rights movement of the '60s, and 2 the #MeToo movement, and instilled hope in women 3 that we would be treated equally and with dignity; 4 not harassment and discrimination. 5 Women had their hopes up when they fought for 6 the right to vote, the right to own property, to 7 make their own medical decisions, without their 8 husbands' decisions; to attend military, medical, 9 law, and business schools, without prejudice against 10 them; to enter predominantly male fields as 11 firefighters, police, pilots, FBI agents, judges, 12 electricians, plumbers, rabbi, minister, priest, and 13 more, to be promoted to levels consistent with those 14 who have been met with equal pay, for promotions 15 given to men with equal education, experience. 16 The norm has been, and still is, in many 17 areas, that women and minorities must have superior 18 credentials to attain positions and salaries that 19 are equal that of White males. 20 Neither New York State, nor New York City, 21 has had a female governor or mayor. 22 No female has been elected as a 23 U.S. President. 24 However, African-American men have all 25 attained those positions. 580 1 Weekend news is headed by a plethora of women 2 and minority hosts. Only recently have women and 3 minorities appeared more frequently during the week. 4 Women have, and still do, put up with lots. 5 Hillary Rodham Clinton was considered too old 6 to be president of the United States, but 7 Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump were older. Nobody 8 cared about their age. 9 Many, even women, do not see through the eyes 10 of harassment and discrimination. 11 Hearings and legislation are two initial 12 steps. 13 The momentum must continue through education, 14 training, compliance, and enforcement in a timely 15 manner, if all serious about eradicating harassment 16 and discrimination. 17 Justice delayed is justice denied. 18 And I'd just like to end with: 19 I graduated from NYU in the top 10 percent of 20 my class. Went on to get a master's degree, with a 21 fellowship. 22 Worked for a year, then went to law school, 23 and a scholarship to Buffalo, but transferred 24 because I was married at the time. 25 Went to Rutgers, where Ruth Bader Ginsberg 581 1 had set up clinics for lawyers. And I graduated 2 with a current U.S. Senator, she was in my class. 3 I have to say that, all of these years, of 4 the 15 years of waiting and hoping for justice, and 5 then losing and saying, as a former varsity player, 6 from elementary school through college, "suck it up 7 and move forward," you can't suck it up and move 8 forward. 9 Retaliation is there forever, especially with 10 government contracts. 11 Thank god for Tisch James, changing the thing 12 of "name your salary," because when I was a 13 chancellor of the rep, a federal law clerk, all the 14 different jobs I had, even if they were temporary, 15 or any of the jobs, an ALJ for the City part-time, 16 representing people with different things, or being 17 a volunteer, I didn't have to list salary anymore, 18 because she passed that for New York City. 19 That needs to be passed, forever, everywhere. 20 The other thing is, the retaliation continues 21 on government applications, especially, "Have you 22 ever been terminated?" 23 You have to tell the truth. 24 And then you tell the truth, and then you're 25 out there: You're the rat, you're the 582 1 (indiscernible). Oh, we can't touch that one. 2 I'm now 70 years old, and I've been asked on 3 interviews -- 4 When I score 100 and I get Number 1, and 5 I know who to call in Albany, to say, Am I going to 6 be interviewed if I'm Number 1? 7 Unless they're veterans, you don't have to 8 interview me. 9 -- and so I'm getting more interviews, and 10 what's the question? 11 You've got a lot of shaky background here. 12 Why do you have so many jobs? 13 It's called "survival." 14 My most recent job was two years. I worked 15 two years for a president of the bus drivers' union. 16 They were doing 100th anniversary for their 17 union. I knew the president from community 18 activity. 19 I did that for two years. 20 The day he had open-heart surgery, which was 21 an emergency, one of his officers came in and said, 22 We don't need you because he's not here. 23 And then it's another gap. 24 Okay? 25 So, just so you get the picture. 583 1 I hope it helps somebody else, because 2 I could tell my family, they've lived this story. 3 My daughters had to make college choices 4 based on my low income. 5 Yeah, there's financial aid. 6 My daughter got into Boston College, her 7 first choice. Financial aid was 3,000 of a loan. 8 She couldn't go there. 9 She ended up going to Binghamton, ended 10 loving it. 11 My other daughter had national merit, she 12 could pick and choose where she went. But she 13 wanted to go to law school. 14 And she had to go to work first, but that 15 kills any financial aid, because now you worked. 16 So, it's really -- it has repercussions for 17 everybody. 18 And, right now, my house is in foreclosure. 19 I was hit with "Sandy" storm. 20 It's not "Queen for a Day," an old show they 21 used to have, but, I just can't win. 22 And I said, I'm gonna just come and tell it, 23 and it is what it is. 24 Prior to this, I wouldn't want it to go 25 public. 584 1 And when we had this problem back in '92, as 2 a coalition, I know the union said, Come on, all of 3 you go together. 4 But all we could see is, "The Daily News," 5 "15 judges, knocked out." 6 And we just thought it would ruin our 7 reputation. 8 Well, mine is ruined. 9 And, at 17, I worked as a telephone operator. 10 Joined VISTA for a year. And from VISTA, 11 I met other people that were in college. I took a 12 year off. And they told me about financial aid. 13 I put myself through school. 14 I have a mother that was a high school 15 dropout, and pregnant at 15, married at 16, and 16 4 kids by 23. 17 And I'm telling you, I am the first female in 18 my family that even graduated college. 19 And now look at me. 20 But, thank you. 21 I'm sorry, I took up more than my 10 minutes, 22 but, sorry. 23 MARIE GUERRERA TOOKER: That's okay. 24 Hi. I would say good morning, but that was 25 at 10:00 this morning. 585 1 But since I've been here now, very long time, 2 I -- 3 [Laughter.] 4 MARIE GUERRERA TOOKER: -- have witnessed 5 remarkable, wonderful people. 6 You, this Assembly, for the first time 7 ever -- 8 I have spoken at the Moreland Commission, 9 county legislation, town board meetings. Thrown out 10 of meetings. 11 -- I have never seen the most compassionate, 12 caring, loving, giving group of government Senators 13 and Assembly. 14 I -- you're a beacon of hope, and I am so 15 grateful, so grateful. 16 It was a pleasure to be here all that time, 17 to see yous act, and, with all this wonder, 18 I just -- I'm in awe. 19 And I'm -- I know now, that New York has a 20 chance. We have a chance. 21 Even though I'm not happy with the Governor, 22 because the Governor has covered up many crimes in 23 my case, and I have caught him taking campaign 24 contributions, not doing good things, covering 25 things up, I know that we have a chance now, by 586 1 being in this room today with all of you. 2 So I am very grateful. 3 So thank you, with all of my heart, and God 4 bless all of you. 5 I didn't fully write my speech about my life 6 because it said not to talk about your life. 7 But I -- I wrote that I am a victim of the 8 "Suffolk Crime Family." 9 And just last Friday, our presiding officer, 10 legislative, Duane Gregory, actually described the 11 "Suffolk Crime Family" as "the Sopranos," publicly. 12 And as you know, Suffolk County has an 13 indicted DA, the chief of police was convicted, the 14 Nassau County supervisor -- executive was convicted. 15 We're having all of these corrupt players, 16 bad actors, being caught. 17 So there is hope. 18 But with women like me, who are 19 whistle-blowers, retaliation is out of control. 20 I'm already marked as this crazy woman, who 21 speaks out. And anything I do, I'm targeted, 22 especially law enforcement. 23 Whenever I go for help, I mean, I've gone 24 from, them killing my animals, to putting me in -- 25 falsely, in jail, to beating me up in front of my 587 1 children, to being undressed from a federal judge. 2 So I experienced a lot, and all because 3 I chose to build my dream that I had since I was a 4 little girl, to take care of orphans and 5 underprivileged children. And I had this beautiful 6 134-acre farm, that became worth $100 million, and 7 I chose not to sell. I chose to follow my dream. 8 And the powers to be wanted this beautiful 9 piece of land, and they came to get me. 10 And my father, unfortunately, was the ring 11 man. He was the ring man that brought all the 12 wolves to me, who paid bribes, kickbacks, favors to 13 all these powerful people, and they took me down, 14 and they tried to destroy my life. 15 But the most important that they didn't do, 16 that they tried to steal my children. 17 And most women today, that are like me, they 18 lose their children. 19 So God had mercy on me, I did not lose my 20 children. 21 But that's why I have the strength to carry 22 on, to help women like me, who do lose their 23 children, which is the most horrific thing that 24 people are not aware of. 25 When you talk like I do, and speak like I do, 588 1 and tell on them, your children are targeted, and 2 they come for your children. 3 And, you're not -- you -- you're 4 dysfunctional. It's a hidden disability, that 5 you're just -- can't function. 6 So harassment just doesn't come on a sexual 7 level. It comes in all forms, and it's -- could be 8 in your own backyard. 9 I call it "war of the land." 10 134-acre farm, I had war in my own backyard. 11 So, I just wanted to start with that. 12 So I want to -- harassment comes in many 13 forms, but the most horrific nightmare of torment is 14 the hidden ones; the hidden sexual comments, the 15 hidden groping, the hidden kiss, the hidden terror 16 to shut you up when you whistle-blow on them. 17 Like Senator Graham said, "When they want to 18 silence you, they kill your cat or puncture your 19 tires." 20 Well, with harassment, they do more than 21 that. They degrade you to a level where you become 22 dysfunctional. 23 Men instill fear in you, belittle you, so you 24 are so beaten down, you just want to crawl under a 25 rock and hope it stops. 589 1 Reality is, it never stops, when you're a 2 strong mother like me who was a threat to the 3 establishment. 4 Harassment continues until you are so broken, 5 you just cannot back -- get back up. 6 We are in such a state of fear to lose our 7 children and home, we bow down to the abuser, and he 8 gets away to abuse the next victim. 9 It is not always just one man harassing you 10 or asking you for a date or making sexual moves on 11 you. Many times it is more than one. 12 For instance, when the police are called to 13 your home, and, instead of them helping you, they're 14 making fun of you, making sexual remarks, to a 15 level, you just give up, while the police are 16 protecting the person you are calling for help from. 17 You are so beaten down, the crimes against 18 you are diminished, and the women (sic) is usually 19 in more danger, because it becomes known to the 20 world that she has no protection. 21 Today, I am forever grateful that the tide is 22 changing, and this new administration is finally 23 putting their foot down and protecting women. 24 Let's face it, God made women beautiful, and 25 men sometimes just cannot help themselves. 590 1 I would have to say, by experience, most 2 women in their lifetime have been harassed more than 3 once, and they usually just deal with it at that 4 moment in time. 5 The word "harassment" is not strong enough to 6 describe the hidden terror that everyday women, 7 single mommies, drug-addicted women, and women who 8 are at their lowest, who are abused by the system, 9 especially by law enforcement and judges. 10 It's men out there that have a political 11 agenda, to degrade you, to gain power, and to get 12 benefits from harassing women, like stealing your 13 children, or stealing your home, or allowing to 14 continue to sell drugs and traffic women. 15 These men who are protected by the corruption 16 that has plagued our country are out of control, 17 need be prosecuted to the fullest, to send a message 18 that women must be protected from the bully. 19 Local police would solicit prostitution, and 20 make a drug-addict woman in the streets give him a, 21 and I -- I'll say it, but it's a little crude, 22 blowjob to get off an arrest. 23 The police would then take the drugs from the 24 prostitute and sell them. 25 The cops got sexually aroused, and then made 591 1 money. 2 This is one example of hidden evil that women 3 suffer in the hands of silent harassment. 4 In today's world, sexuality is exploited, 5 unbridled, seductive, and considered glamorous in 6 the media, more and more predominant than ever in 7 history. 8 In the olden days, women did not have fake 9 nails or cosmetic surgery. Women were just natural, 10 working hard to survive, milking a cow or planting 11 corn. 12 Women are so discriminated against throughout 13 history, and are still not fully protected today. 14 Although women have come a long way, there 15 are categories of women under the new laws who are 16 still not protected. 17 "Workplace" needs to be changed to "anywhere 18 women are harassed." 19 "Sexual harassment" needs to be changed to 20 "any form of degrading a woman," especially when it 21 happens from law enforcement or judges. 22 Without hesitation, judges, if they harass a 23 woman, need to be impeached. 24 So you ask, what we should do? 25 The first step is to take a good look at the 592 1 judiciary. Enough is enough with the corrupt judge. 2 I want to speak on behalf of what I witnessed 3 with women, especially the ones who cannot speak for 4 themselves, because they died. 5 Her name was Danielle (ph.), who I met in the 6 dark, in my driveway, on property I own, that was 7 under siege by drug deals and prostitution, fully 8 protected by law enforcement. 9 I asked her what she was doing in my 10 driveway, and she started crying. She told me she 11 had two sons, and had to leave them and her home 12 because her husband was abusing her and had 13 protection by someone powerful. 14 She became a drug addict and lived in the 15 streets, and serviced the police to survive. 16 How does a mommy lose her two sons, walk the 17 streets, homeless, in today's world? 18 Why? 19 Because law enforcement and the court system 20 protected the abusive man. 21 I believe Danielle was killed in the streets 22 with a hotshot because -- because the police -- by 23 the police, because she was giving me evidence and 24 telling on powerful people. 25 I spent my life as a philanthropist, helping 593 1 the poor. I probably saved over 1,000 people. 2 Many people have come to me to tell me their 3 stories. That's why I'm such a threat to the 4 establishment. 5 Other women who came to me, like Bianca, who 6 overdosed and died. 7 She was giving me evidence of law enforcement 8 selling drugs and running the prostitution ring on 9 the east end of Long Island. 10 Five days before she died, she reached out to 11 me and was afraid for her life. 12 I could not save her, because the men were 13 too powerful, and I had nowhere to go to help her, 14 because it was the local authorities that were 15 involved. 16 The workplace is not always in a building. 17 It could be in a hay field, on a farm, or in the 18 police station, or right in a courtroom filled with 19 men before a sadistic judge, a theatrical play, 20 where the script has been written way before you got 21 to the podium. 22 These judges and attorneys already colluded 23 and marked you to be a target of their sick, 24 sadistic actions of terrorizing women, so they can 25 steal your children and home. 594 1 Our God-given rights have been plagued with 2 corruption on every level of government, and 3 completely ignored by society. 4 Congratulations to all who were elected 5 during the 100-year anniversary of women's rights. 6 I pray to God that you protect all women, and 7 bring hope to the women who are still suffering, 8 oppressed, and change the laws to add the hidden 9 harassment to the target of women that are abused in 10 their own backyard, in the police department, or in 11 the courtroom. 12 In my experience, when a sick, sadistic judge 13 wants to punish you, and steal a 134-acre farm that 14 was slated for a philanthropic endeavor to protect 15 children and veterans, they abuse you and degrade 16 you, instill fear in you, to shut you up, so you 17 cannot defend yourself in a court of law. 18 When the act is so horrific, the average 19 person cannot believe that a federal judge, like 20 Judge Grossman, can be so sadistic, and say in a 21 room filled with men -- 22 And I was going to do this, but, you guys are 23 just so wonderful. 24 -- "Take your sweater off for a second, and 25 hang out." 595 1 "Take your sweater off for a second and hang 2 out (demonstrating)." 3 We all know what a "second" is, and "hanging 4 out" means to protrude, to stick out. 5 No woman should ever experience this kind of 6 harassment by a judge, leaving her no protection as 7 he degrades you as a woman, using his powerful 8 position to instill fear in you, and to shut you up 9 so you cannot defend yourself. 10 I would never go back in his courtroom after 11 what he did to me. 12 Women need to be protected from men in power, 13 and Judge Grossman needs to be impeached, 14 immediately. 15 I was lucky, this abuse is on audio. 16 Many women like me will never get protected, 17 because it is covered up by other judges and law 18 enforcement. 19 So my question to this Committee is: Who 20 will sponsor a petition of remonstrance to have 21 judges impeached if they sexually harass a woman in 22 a court of law, and to change the laws to protect 23 women from men with powerful positions who have 24 immunity? 25 Immunity needs to be taken out of the 596 1 equation. 2 Thank you so much for allowing me to speak 3 today on behalf of all women who suffer in the hands 4 of powerful men who are protected by our corrupt 5 system. 6 And I hope and pray the laws are changed to 7 protect us, and the future of women's rights, so 8 men, like Judge Grossman, lose their powerful 9 position, and never hurt mommies like me again. 10 Thank you. 11 CHRISTINE REARDON: Good evening, and thank 12 you, everybody, Assemblymembers, for allowing me to 13 speak. 14 My name is Christine Reardon. 15 My issue has to do with my former employer, 16 the MTA. 17 I began my career at the MTA, Long Island 18 Railroad, in 1983, and worked there for 27-plus 19 years in various positions, including the manager of 20 benefits administration. 21 In 2005 I opted to exercise my seniority, 22 passed qualified -- qualification exams over a 23 one-year period, and became a crew dispatcher. 24 I opted to make this career move due to the 25 pressure I was under as a manager; the inflexibility 597 1 of my managerial schedule, and to better facilitate 2 the IVF process my husband, Dennis, (motioning) and 3 I were involved in. 4 After four years, struggling to achieve 5 pregnancy, I gave birth to our beautiful daughter, 6 Chavon (ph.) Faith (indicating), on April 8, 2010. 7 I remained on maternity leave until August, 8 when I returned as crew dispatcher. I was assigned 9 a male trainee, who made a verbal threat against me 10 on October 8, 2010. 11 I immediately reported this threat. 12 But due to the manager's inappropriate 13 handling of the harassment, I went over their heads, 14 to their supervisor, in an attempt to have the 15 threat appropriately addressed. 16 My manager's retaliation for doing so 17 included harassment, bullying, and filing false 18 charges against me. 19 My research, with the assistance of my shift 20 supervisor, to challenge those charges prompted my 21 managers to collude in misrepresenting my job 22 performance. 23 And when I chose to go to trial to refute 24 those charges, those same managers sandbagged me 25 with unspecified accusations. 598 1 They refused to reveal to me the details of 2 those charges, and they threatened me with loss of 3 pension, loss of my husband's pension, and physical 4 arrest, if I did not sign a scrolled one-sentence 5 resignation that very day. 6 I was terrified. 7 And under such unexpected and unwarranted 8 threats, I resigned under the most mental duress 9 I have ever experienced. 10 The writing was on the wall. 11 I had seen how the managers operated in the 12 past, and I feared further retaliation. 13 Despite a verbal assurance that my 14 resignation that very day would not impact my 15 receiving my pension and other benefits, I was later 16 threatened with pension loss, and illegally denied 17 payment of accrued vacation time. 18 My husband and I were devastated, and fearful 19 to challenge the juggernaut of collusion and 20 retaliation. 21 This is the typical bureaucratic bullying 22 endemic at the MTA. 23 Three months later I was contacted by the MTA 24 Office of the Inspector General, asked if I would 25 serve as a witness to colleagues' complaints about 599 1 the misogynistic work culture, replete with sexism, 2 racism, threats, pornography, and retaliation. 3 The MTA OIG was given my name as someone who 4 experienced the same treatment that they were 5 bringing to the OIG's attention. 6 I didn't call the MTA OIG; they called me. 7 We were elated to have an opportunity to 8 reveal what happened to me to a State entity, and 9 that could provide me with a fair and full 10 investigation, and offer protection from further 11 retaliation from the railroad. 12 The MTA Office of Inspector General did 13 nothing of the kind. 14 This 8-year runaround by that agency 15 includes: 16 An initial promise-of-protection agreement, 17 which they reneged on only two days later; 18 An initial investigation, with as many as 19 12 other witnesses, that the MTA OIG decided to 20 forgo. 21 A re-engagement with the MTA OIG, only after 22 we reached out to numerous elected officials and an 23 MTA board member, to request a review by the MTA 24 OIG. 25 That initial re-engagement and interview was 600 1 also discounted, until we garnered the support of 2 Congressman Pete King. 3 Suddenly, the MTA OIG expressed an interest, 4 prompted by the Congressman's advocacy. 5 Finally, the MTA OIG agreed to interview 6 witnesses we had proposed, and we were again once 7 hopeful. But another year went by, with little or 8 no movement, and with us doing all the heavy 9 lifting, and continuing to seek out elected 10 officials to highlight the injustice of what was 11 done to me. 12 More than four years after targeting me for 13 exposing the harassment that I and my colleagues 14 were subjected to, the MTA OIG was still stalling, 15 and ineffectively investigating my case. 16 We decided to reach to our witnesses, to 17 compile statements of what they had told the 18 MTA OIG, which included their assertion that I did 19 nothing wrong, and did not deserve the treatment 20 I received, which, in essence, was constructive 21 termination, as well as their testifying to the type 22 of harassment and abuse of women that this forum is 23 addressing. 24 We deemed this outreach to our witnesses 25 necessary, since none of our witnesses were asked to 601 1 sign statements at the time of the interviews. 2 Can you see the plot thickening? 3 Does it sound familiar? 4 This was years before the #MeToo movement 5 served as a catalyst for where we now find 6 ourselves. 7 Time is up. 8 Only one week after the last testimony was 9 received by Congressman King and sent to the OIG, 10 suddenly, there was movement. 11 Coincidence? 12 After four years of being discounted, lied 13 to, and misled, the lead investigator at the 14 inspector general's office, in a series of phone 15 conversations, all of which are documented, 16 discussed the investigation, his findings, 17 reiterated the demands we were seeking, and told us 18 that the railroad was willing to negotiate a 19 settlement in close accordance with all items of 20 compensation that I had been seeking since I was 21 bullied out of my job. 22 Well, here I am, still waiting all these 23 years later. 24 All I have received has been denial of any 25 compensation, reversal of what I was told, and a 602 1 fallacious formal report, which I was told would not 2 be necessary, which we (indicating) had to push for 3 when the railroad reneged on what the MTA assured us 4 would occur. 5 That formal report was compiled after the 6 MTA OIG met with the railroad, and colluded to 7 produce a false, biased, and misleading tome, which 8 did not, by any interpretation, represent what I had 9 been told. 10 Despite the MTA OIG assuring us that we would 11 be part of the process of investigation, and that we 12 would be permitted to review and comment on the 13 report before it was finalized, that never occurred. 14 Once again, I was silenced and misled. 15 All parties involved know that what they did, 16 in collusion to continue this attack on me, this 17 could have been resolved eight years ago when the 18 MTA OIG contacted me to be a witness to what was 19 done to me and my colleagues. 20 When the MTA OIG and the railroad colluded to 21 circle the trains, they derailed justice, and many 22 representatives of the state government, who 23 promised us an unbiased venue, were at the controls. 24 On February 19, 2015, a 14-minute 25 conversation with the special counsel for the OIG, 603 1 assuring us that the railroad was willing to end 2 this debacle with a fair settlement, well, that 3 should be evidence enough. 4 In that conversation, he assured us that the 5 settlement would be swift; that we would not have to 6 re-present our case; that entities don't settle 7 unless there was good cause to do so; that the 8 settlement would be close, if not exactly, in line 9 with all my demands for appropriate compensation to 10 be made whole, all of which were discussed in 11 detail. 12 When my husband, Dennis, asked the special 13 counsel what his report stated that would induce the 14 railroad to offer a settlement, he kindly told us 15 that a formal settlement was not necessary, because 16 I didn't need to be mentioned in such a document, 17 and didn't need my name dragged through the mud. 18 What a guy, what compassion, to spare me any 19 more emotional pain. 20 What a crock. 21 His only desire was to stall us until we went 22 away, and to spare the MTA OIG and the railroad from 23 any further scandal. 24 What are they waiting for? 25 For my story to be on the evening news? 604 1 Can they hear me now? 2 Additionally, we started to engage with the 3 Governor's representatives in October 2014 when we 4 began to see the writing on the wall. 5 Our novice experience and our na�vet� in this 6 theater of the absurd led us to believe that, with 7 the spotlight of Governor Cuomo's purview, we would 8 be treated fairly. 9 As the outspoken defender of women rights in 10 New York, and as he was approaching his second run 11 for governor, we thought someone would be 12 interested, and they were, but only in leading us 13 along, and then dropping any involvement, as we 14 pursued each representative. 15 There initial cordial engagement morphed into 16 no return phone calls, e-mails, or any other type of 17 response, despite their assurances of their concern. 18 Now, four years later, and after working our 19 way up from the basement of Governor Cuomo's 20 hierarchy, to the penthouse offices of Lieutenant 21 Governor Hochul, and a number of well-known and 22 outspoken administrative officials, all supposed 23 women's advocates and cheerleaders, they have 24 continued to delay and deny me a venue to be fairly 25 heard. 605 1 Fortunately, we have copious files of all our 2 e-mail conversations, and irrefutable documentation 3 of all our phone conversations, conferences, and 4 refusals to follow up on their assurances of the 5 Governor's concern. 6 Conversely, our recent contact, one of the 7 Governor's counsels and spokesperson, has referred 8 my case to a third entity. 9 In fairness, we are respecting the integrity 10 and confidentiality of that process until it is 11 completed. 12 We will comply with our recent engagement 13 with this investigative agency, as we have done with 14 agencies and individuals; all those agencies, often 15 to our detriment, who are mandated to adhere to a 16 code of ethics, that have fallen woefully short 17 throughout this nine-year attack on me. 18 Our faith has often been misplaced, but we 19 will go through this process with the hope that they 20 have spiritual awakening, and finally provide fair 21 treatment and long-delayed justice. 22 As the former U.S. attorney general for the 23 Southern District of New York, Preet Bharara, is 24 fond of saying, "Stay tuned." 25 We may have been naive, but we were 606 1 persistent, consistent, and, although jaded, have 2 steadfastly advocated to be heard treated -- and to 3 be heard and treated fairly. 4 And this summary is my short version. 5 Thank you for this opportunity for review. 6 And the bottom line is: 7 This is not an employment issue as the MTA 8 would like to spin it. 9 This is an issue of a state agency colluding 10 with another state entity to silence a woman who was 11 harassed and threatened, and robbed of her 27-year 12 career. 13 The shell game is over. 14 They keep shifting responsibility back and 15 forth between the MTA OIG, the Long Island Railroad, 16 the MTA board, and the Governor's representatives, 17 and they should all be held accountable for this 18 miscarriage of justice by our governor, the champion 19 of women's rights. 20 The support of my family, and our belief that 21 God is always watching, are the only things that 22 have sustained me these last eight years. 23 I very much appreciate your time and concern, 24 and look forward to a continuing dialogue with 25 concerned individuals. 607 1 Thank you. 2 DENNIS REARDON: She has some suggestions. 3 CHRISTINE REARDON: I also do have some 4 suggestions, if I may. 5 Transparency, and allowing individuals who 6 are the victims of harassment, to be privy to the 7 investigation, and the statements made by those who 8 are covering up their egregious behaviors to protect 9 themselves, in real-time. 10 Victims should not be forced to wait several 11 years, and never hear the rebuttal and fallacious 12 rhetoric during the process of investigation, and 13 not after the case is closed. 14 Victims should be informed about anyone and 15 everyone participating in the investigation, and 16 should be given the opportunity to have their 17 witnesses accompany them to those meetings. 18 Also, remove the protection that the MTA 19 Inspector General's Office has in running their own 20 investigation, when they are so, so incredibly 21 devoid of integrity. 22 The New York State Inspector General does not 23 have legal authority over the MTA Office of 24 Inspector General. 25 And, obviously, to increase the number of 608 1 women in lead positions on these boards. 2 We are buoyed by the fact that, presently, 3 our attorney general, as well as the New York State 4 Inspector General, are women with extensive 5 experience in investigations. 6 Any individual given the authority to protect 7 the victims of the kind of abuses we are here to 8 discuss, should be independent from influence by any 9 elected official or lobbiest with deep pockets, or 10 connected to the deeply entrenched "old boys' club" 11 culture, and needs to be thoroughly vetted prior to 12 their appointments. 13 The standard excuse of confidentiality, and 14 ongoing investigation, is an often-used ploy to 15 avoid accountability and transparency. 16 "Confidential" is a euphonism for 17 clandestine, covert, cunning, calculated collusion 18 to cover up rather than expose. 19 Harassment and abuse of women grows like 20 bacteria when kept in the dark. 21 And as you cast a spotlight on the deeply 22 entrenched agency and bureaucratic shell game, 23 prepare yourself for finger-pointing and denial. 24 Don't give up out of frustration and 25 exhaustion. 609 1 That is what the railroad and the MTA OIG 2 hoped we would do, but we have not. 3 Thank you so much for this opportunity to 4 bring to light my story of the abuse that I was 5 subjected to for confronting the harassment of women 6 in my office. 7 Thank you. 8 SENATOR BIAGGI: Thank you all for sharing 9 your stories with us this evening, and thank you for 10 staying here until such a late hour, and being so 11 patient to do so. 12 DENNIS REARDON: May I interject something? 13 SENATOR BIAGGI: Oh, you may. 14 DENNIS REARDON: You know, when I walked in 15 here, I was told by friends of mine, "You're walking 16 in with a pork-chop suit into the lion's den." 17 But I didn't experience that. 18 SENATOR BIAGGI: Thank you. 19 DENNIS REARDON: I experienced warmth, 20 courtesy. 21 I've had some phone calls with some of the 22 people here, and they couldn't have been any more 23 engaging or gracious. 24 And to get M&Ms and popcorn, on top of it, 25 for my daughter, you're a winner, and I appreciate 610 1 it. 2 But I came in, and I can't really identify, 3 obviously, with the perilousness that these ladies 4 have felt in their lives, but I've witnessed it, 5 I've stood on the outside. 6 And as a man, unable to protect my family, 7 I feel a different sense of powerlessness. 8 I respect this gentleman on the panel. 9 I wish that there were more men in the room. 10 I guess it was kind of perceived that this 11 was woman's issue, and it certainly is. But the men 12 in their lives who watch them suffer, for 8 years, 13 and how it prevented us from moving on with our 14 childhood-planning plans. 15 Without going into details, Christine 16 mentioned the IVF process, we had more plans to 17 continue. 18 But with harassment, and a constant threat of 19 losing your livelihood, and being attacked in the 20 media, which is what they did, where are we to go? 21 I worked in the field as a substance-abuse 22 counselor, among other jobs, and I saw the 23 powerlessness of women who were abused by men who 24 were out of control. Borderline personalities, 25 sociopaths; "anti-social personalities" as they call 611 1 them now, because we can't call them "sociopaths," 2 because that's what they are. 3 And I saw women suffer for years and years 4 and years. 5 And then come to the rooms to get help, and 6 be victimized by men in the rooms, who still weren't 7 really turning their lives around, but were using 8 that center of safety to victimize women. 9 It is atrocious, it is obnoxious. 10 What's going to change? 11 Severe punishment, censure. 12 40 years ago, in an early social-work course 13 I took, the professor who was a disabled gentleman, 14 who could barely talk, gave the most amazing 15 lectures, and people stood in awe. 16 We still need to stand in awe of everybody 17 who's been disabled or disempowered or beaten up, 18 and clear up the lens. The lens of this 19 misogynistic culture is unbelievable. 20 Men have to clear it up as much as the women 21 who confront it. 22 It's not their responsibility; it's our 23 responsibility, as fathers and brothers. 24 I'm the father of four girls, I'm the brother 25 of three young women, and I would never accept this 612 1 in my life. 2 I'm six-foot-four. You're not going to abuse 3 me, you're not going to harass me, you're not going 4 to threaten me, but you can do that to the women in 5 this room, until men in the workplace, who are 6 courageous enough to stand up and say, Stop it. 7 Those sex-counter groups, the harassment 8 groups, who runs it? 9 Guys who are really not very aggressive and 10 don't confront people. 11 Don't confront anybody. 12 I'm sorry, if you feel guilty, there's a 13 room -- they say in the rooms of AA, "If it doesn't 14 apply, let it fly. And if it does, you better 15 duck." 16 Duck, but come back and get healthy. 17 If you're not going to get healthy, and the 18 men aren't doing it, it's our responsibility as men. 19 I'm so glad to be here. 20 I'm so honored to be the husband of a wife 21 who is proud and courageous, but was intimidated and 22 threatened in a place, there were all men in that 23 office. 24 And when I suggested I would go in and 25 perhaps address it in a slightly inappropriate way, 613 1 I was suggested that they would fire me, and I would 2 be taken out in handcuffs. 3 I deferred to what everyone said. 4 I've been in recovery, by the grace of God, 5 for 38 years, and I've learned how to control my 6 behaviors, and know I can only change what I do. 7 That's why we're here. 8 We fought this for 8 years, all the way up to 9 the Governor's people. 10 And now we're here with you. 11 Thank God you gave us this opportunity. 12 CHRISTINE REARDON: Thank you. 13 DENNIS REARDON: And I pray for you and the 14 men in your lives that could maybe start to step to 15 the plate for a change. 16 Thank you. 17 CHRISTINE REARDON: Thank you. 18 CYNTHIA LOWNEY, ESQ.: And I would also like 19 to add that I have been to many, many meetings, 20 public meetings. And I know that they usually go on 21 long and long, and usually there's nobody left at 22 the end. 23 So I want to thank all of you for staying, 24 because it's been long, and it's been very hard for 25 all of us to listen to things that we can't change. 614 1 We're sitting there, it's like reliving our 2 problem through other people. 3 It's really been torture in a way, but thank 4 you for being so compassionate without being 5 patronistic, maternalistic, or some -- you know, 6 giving some kind of phoney responses, because that's 7 what they do a lot. 8 And by the way, that's the thing they really 9 do at transportation: they're gonna you this and 10 give you that, but they're just yessing people, and 11 nothing gets done. 12 I really get the sense you're going to take 13 it all in and do something. 14 So thank you very much. 15 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMOTAS: Thank you so much. 16 And it's important that society clears the 17 lens; not men, not women, but our entire society. 18 Thank you so very much. 19 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: A couple of quick 20 comments. 21 Appreciate the mention on the "salary history 22 ban" practice, the legislation that then-public 23 advocate Tisch James forwarded to city counsel. 24 It's a piece of legislation that I carry in 25 the state, and we are looking forward to passing 615 1 that bill this year again, and seeing it law. 2 And I appreciate all of your comments in 3 regards to the work of all of my colleagues here. 4 And I must say, I appreciate your candor, as 5 a husband, as a man, willing to say that we all need 6 to do better. 7 I will say that many of our colleagues in the 8 State Legislature, many of the men that were here 9 earlier, chairs of committees, that have been a part 10 of these conversations for years, advocating for 11 change and for these issues to be addressed. 12 It's been stated over and over, these 13 hearings have taken too long, but, we're here to do 14 the best we can. 15 And we poured, not only our political and/or 16 our legislative time towards addressing these issues 17 the right way, but I think, in a moral sense, how 18 could we not want to hear these stories, and care 19 deeply about the impacts. 20 Again, we're all family members; we all have 21 daughters, we all have sisters, moms, and other 22 women in our lives, that matter. 23 And, we need to make sure that we create an 24 environment, and as many of you have stated, not 25 just in the workplace, but around the workplace, 616 1 where sexual harassment is just not accepted, and 2 not occurring. And where it does, that we have 3 policies to address it. 4 So we really appreciate your testimony, and 5 also the fact that you've made recommendations that 6 we can review, and take a look at. 7 And it's not lost on us, that we have to also 8 go back to other agencies that are not maybe 9 governed by some of our legislation. 10 But the judiciary is one that we also need to 11 take a deeper dive into, what the practice is 12 within. 13 So, really appreciate all your testimony. 14 DENNIS REARDON: Can I just share one more 15 piece that was glossed over, because we were both so 16 nervous? 17 Journalists are one of the most powerful 18 advocates in our country, the media. 19 Unfortunately, when people who are doing this 20 do not have the super-ego with a conscience to look 21 what they've done, they only understand, 22 unfortunately, severe censure and punishment that's 23 effective and carried through. 24 There are a number of journalists, in all the 25 newspapers, male and female, all ethnicities, who 617 1 are starting to really address and put people's feet 2 the fire. 3 That's, unfortunately, what many of them 4 need, but thank God we have it, because, with that 5 spotlight on things, they squirm. It's like putting 6 a magnifying glass, when you were a kid, on the poor 7 ant, which we shouldn't do anymore, but I did as a 8 kid. 9 When that spotlight is put on these people, 10 they squirm, they point fingers, and they throw each 11 other under the bus. 12 We need more buses, and we need more 13 magnifying glasses, and I'm glad you're here to do 14 that for us. 15 Thank you. 16 SENATOR BIAGGI: Thank you. 17 So as I began to say before, I hear you, and 18 I understand, when you discuss and say, and really 19 underscore, the abusive system that our government 20 has created, and has a resistance to dismantling. 21 One of the reasons we're here is to do that. 22 And one of the reasons why I ran for this 23 seat was exactly the reason that you're describing, 24 because, for too many years, the people in my 25 district were not put first. 618 1 And the entire point of public service is to 2 serve people, not to serve ourselves. 3 And similarly situated, when I ran for the 4 seat that I ran for, I was threatened, and I was 5 told that my life would be over, and my career would 6 be over, and I was crazy, and I would never win. 7 And, oh, my goodness, what are you doing? 8 And, along the journey, to this very moment, 9 was attempted to be silenced. 10 And I think that one of the most interesting, 11 and really spectacular characteristics of human 12 beings, is resilience. 13 And each and every one of you demonstrates 14 that. 15 And, it's important to not stay silent, and 16 that when you see something that doesn't seem right 17 or doesn't look right, you speak up and you speak 18 out, no matter who tells you not to. 19 And I'm grateful that we have your testimony 20 today. 21 I think that it's not lost on me that we 22 started this day with one of my questions being: 23 Well, who does the MTA and the judiciary 24 report to? Who's overseeing those two bodies? 25 It seems curious that they're not under the 619 1 purview of GOER. 2 But I think that these are the exact types of 3 opportunities that couldn't have happened before. 4 And, because we are in a transformational 5 moment of government and leadership, and because we 6 are moving away from silencing people, even if 7 there's still a strong attempt to silence people who 8 speak up, this space that we've created, this space 9 that our leadership has allowed us to create, is 10 very special, it's very important. 11 And we are, and my -- (indiscernible) will 12 just speak for myself, I am committed to making sure 13 that the change does happen, even if it's just inch 14 by inch. 15 So thank you so much. 16 We hear you, and we appreciate all of your 17 recommendations, and the things that you've said to 18 us today. 19 MARIE GUERRERA TOOKER: Thank you. 20 God bless all of you. 21 Thank you so much. 22 CYNTHIA LOWNEY, ESQ.: Wait, are they done? 23 MARIE GUERRERA TOOKER: Yep. 24 CYNTHIA LOWNEY, ESQ.: Is that it? 25 I thought the others would ask a question. 620 1 MARIE GUERRERA TOOKER: Nobody's going to ask 2 us anything. 3 SENATOR BIAGGI: Councilwoman 4 Helen Rosenthal. 5 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Just stretching. 6 HELEN ROSENTHAL: Keep stretching. You're 7 knocking it out of the ballpark here. 8 I'm sure you're -- I'm feeling emotional, and 9 I'm sure you're feeling emotional as well. 10 This has been a hell of a day, just 11 phenomenal testimony. 12 Good afternoon. 13 My name is Helen Rosenthal. I represent the 14 Upper West Side in the New York City Council. 15 I'm Chair of the Committee on Women and 16 Gender Equity. And, I often say that the real title 17 of the committee should be, that it is the Committee 18 of Men's Bad Behavior. 19 And, I'm hoping to work myself out of a 20 committee. 21 I thank you so much, to Chairs Biaggi and 22 Crespo and Walker, for convening the hearing on 23 sexual harassment in the workplace, and for staying. 24 And, Senator Niou and Assemblymembers Simotas 25 and Simon, thank you for staying. 621 1 There are a lot of people who are watching 2 this, they might not be in the room, and they're 3 noticing that you're still here. And, it means a 4 lot to the public. 5 Today's hearing, in fact, gives the public 6 another opportunity to hear directly from harassment 7 survivors about the real-life impact of current 8 laws, or the lack of current laws, so that the 9 failures of the current system can be brought to 10 light, and addressed through legislation. 11 It also gives the public an opportunity to 12 hear from government officials responsible for 13 addressing sexual harassment in the workplace, 14 whether it's in government or the private sector. 15 Your joint hearing in Albany in February, the 16 first state-level public hearing on workplace sexual 17 harassment since 1992, revealed the necessary -- the 18 necessity of comprehensive systemic improvements to 19 workplace culture. 20 Sorry. 21 I commend you for this second hearing. 22 I heard elected officials ask the 23 administration, good, commonsense questions about 24 accountability, the need for trauma-informed 25 investigations, and as well as process, numbers, and 622 1 transparency. 2 And I heard you asking about, how complaints 3 are accommodated during an investigation. 4 You dug into the details; your questions were 5 thorough, smart, probing, rigorous, and spot-on. 6 And I have to say I was disappointed, when 7 the administration looked at you, in particular, 8 Senator Biaggi, like you had three heads. 9 And I just want to remind you, that you have 10 one head, and the person sitting here had three 11 heads. 12 SENATOR BIAGGI: Thank you. 13 HELEN ROSENTHAL: I didn't say that out loud, 14 I thought it. But I didn't say it out loud. 15 The public is very grateful to each of you 16 for persisting, and I support you. 17 The personal, professional, and societal 18 effects of sexual harassment and discrimination in 19 the workplace are staggering. 20 Harassers interrupt the lives of survivors. 21 They stand in the way of their ability to earn a 22 living, and rise professionally. They intimidate, 23 coerce, manipulate; they attempt to strip away 24 survivors' dignity. 25 And due to the longstanding pervasiveness and 623 1 culture of silence around discriminatory workplace 2 behavior, we can never fully know the number of 3 women who have been driven from jobs because of 4 sexual harassment, or the pain and suffering that 5 harassers have inflicted, or the talent, the sheer 6 talent, that has been drained from workplaces and 7 industries. 8 Thanks to the brave voices of so many 9 survivors and advocates who are challenging the 10 status quo, we are on the way to eradicating this 11 toxic culture. 12 Sunlight is the best disinfectant. 13 We owe these survivors not only gratitude, 14 but action. 15 As the State considers reforms on sexual 16 harassment, they should look at New York City as a 17 model. We have led the way in establishing 18 sexual-harassment practices and policies. 19 Last spring I was proud to play a leading 20 role in the passage of the Stop Sexual Harassment 21 Act in New York City. 22 The act requires enhanced training for all 23 public- and private-sector employees; 24 Provides recourse for people who have been 25 harassed and discriminated against, through 624 1 establishing a trauma-informed statute of 2 limitations; 3 And increases transparency and accountability 4 with city government, the largest employer in the 5 five boroughs. 6 And we are moving forward with a second 7 hearing in June, to review additional legislation. 8 Since 2009, New York City has applied a 9 standard that sexual harassment exists, under City 10 Human Rights Law, when an individual is "treated 11 less well than other employees because of gender," 12 and the conduct complained -- sorry, and the conduct 13 complained of, consists of more than "petty slights 14 or trivial inconveniences." 15 We rightly codified this more protective 16 standard into law, and, as a result, workers in 17 New York City enjoy far greater protections against 18 sexual harassment than workers elsewhere in New York 19 State. 20 Your slate of legislation, which will provide 21 these protections across the state, is now under 22 consideration. 23 And I will proudly introduce a resolution in 24 the city council next week, supporting all of your 25 bills, and chief among these is Assembly Bill 7083 625 1 and Senate Bills 3817, which will finally remove the 2 current "severe or pervasive" legal standard for 3 demonstrating discrimination under State Human 4 Rights Law. 5 Thank you for that. 6 This burdensome standard clearly impedes 7 employees experiencing harassment from bringing 8 claims forward, and must be changed. 9 And you heard from the City Commission on 10 Human Rights today, talking about that commonsense 11 change, and the fact that it had only a positive 12 effect on the workforce. 13 My resolution also supports your legislation, 14 which will strengthen protections for workers; 15 Extend the statute of limitations for filing 16 a discrimination complaint; 17 Amend the State Constitution to expand 18 protected classes, and increase language access. 19 While it's essential that the State pass 20 these bills, doing so does not mean our work will be 21 over. 22 New York must continue to lead on this issue. 23 We must ensure that survivors know their 24 rights, that bystanders know how to intervene when 25 they see sexual harassment, and that harassers know 626 1 that the days in which they could operate with 2 impunity are over. 3 As elected and public officials, we must 4 clearly draw the line against what has been 5 tolerated for so long. 6 Ending sexual harassment and discrimination 7 is fundamentally a social-justice issue, in which an 8 injury to one is an injury to all. 9 This issue demands the same persistent energy 10 and attention given to the Reproductive Health Act, 11 to rent reform, and speed cameras in school zones. 12 Thank you again for the opportunity to 13 testify, and thank you for bringing the experts who 14 testified today. 15 I learned so much from them, and it has 16 informed my work, going forward. 17 I thank you for that, and I'm happy to answer 18 any questions you might have. 19 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Councilwoman, thank you 20 for being patient, and your testimony, and also for 21 your leadership. 22 I think it's become abundantly clear that the 23 City standards that you all have set forward really 24 should be our standard. 25 And, we look forward to working to pass our 627 1 colleague's legislation to do the same statewide. 2 I'm really curious, though, do you have an 3 early indication of what some of those additional 4 pieces you may consider in June, are? 5 HELEN ROSENTHAL: Uh-huh. 6 ASSEMBLYMAN CRESPO: Are those being 7 formulated, or do you have already have a sense of 8 proposals that have been put out? 9 HELEN ROSENTHAL: We've learned from the 10 reporting requirements that we put on the City, that 11 they weren't clear enough. 12 So it's remarkable how you think, in the 13 wording, you're getting something right. But, then, 14 when it comes to rule-making, perhaps what we get 15 out of the analysis isn't what we should get. 16 For example, we passed a bill, requiring that 17 all government workers be given an opportunity to 18 fill out a climate survey about sexual harassment. 19 That was done, and we have the results of 20 that survey. 21 And it is, even for somebody like me who 22 loves to dig down into the weeds, I looked at the 23 result and my head was spinning. 24 There's no way to really understand what the 25 findings tell us. 628 1 So we have another piece of legislation that 2 calls for better analysis, more agency-specific 3 analysis, and more meaningful findings, rather than 4 just a regurgitation of answers to questions. 5 That's one. 6 There were some others. 7 We're looking at requiring agencies to be 8 very clear about accommodations, and there being 9 some sort of recording -- reporting requirement, 10 perhaps even in the climate survey, for making sure 11 that people are given accommodations; that they are 12 interviewed by someone who is -- has trauma-informed 13 investigative skills. 14 You know, we always talk about these EEO 15 officers, and how they're trained, and they're so 16 expert. 17 Are they? 18 What -- I mean, are they trained? 19 This is a new era, where we're changing the 20 culture and calling out sexual harassment. 21 The same old training manual does not apply. 22 Our understanding of trauma is so much more 23 advanced now. 24 We know now that, you know, someone's story 25 might change three times over the course of three 629 1 days, and that is normal, right, not to be 2 dismissed. 3 So -- and I would add to that, that some of 4 the things we learned won't necessarily result in 5 more legislation. 6 But, I will be calling for activists to 7 engage in making sure that the sexual -- the 8 anti-sexual harassment laws that are supposed to be 9 posted in restaurants, for example, we should be 10 going out and checking the restaurants; are they 11 posted? 12 You know, there's so much more work to be 13 done. We're just scratching the surface. 14 I appreciate the question, Assemblyman. 15 SENATOR BIAGGI: I just briefly want to 16 comment on my incredible amount of gratitude for you 17 waiting here, Councilwoman, and for sharing your 18 testimony, and for also reminding all of us about, 19 just, when it feels wrong, it's wrong. 20 And that is an important thing, sometimes, 21 because the work that we do, and the individuals we 22 interact with, obviously, are not always 23 forthcoming. 24 And so that was really very important and 25 helpful. 630 1 I also just want to say thank you for your 2 expedient response to so much of what's going on in 3 the city council. 4 And it's all different types of behavior. 5 And I think one of the most important things 6 is that, you set a tone that is, from where we are 7 in the state, it's hard to meet, but we're reaching 8 to catch up. 9 And I think that it also allows for some 10 people maybe who wouldn't be as brave to come 11 forward or to speak up, or wouldn't want to speak 12 up, to do that. 13 And I think, the last thing I'll say, is 14 that, what has, you know, transpired in the city 15 council is not such a foreign thing. It's in every 16 workplace. 17 HELEN ROSENTHAL: Yes. 18 SENATOR BIAGGI: But what is really 19 interesting, and what has been really important for 20 us, at least for myself, in the state, is that 21 there's isn't just one definition, or one 22 consequence, or one outcome, of harassment or sexual 23 harassment in the -- or discrimination, in 24 workplace. 25 It's a scale. 631 1 So, it really just solidifies, at least for 2 me, that the "severe or pervasive" standard is so 3 out of touch with where we are culturally, and that, 4 you know, not every act is a 10, but not every act 5 is a 1. 6 And so there's this scale that the law has to 7 adjust with. 8 And I am very much in appreciation of your 9 willingness to put a resolution to the city council, 10 for myself, and Assemblywoman Simotas's bill, 11 because it is the better-off bill. 12 It will change so many people's lives, and, 13 we'll just make all of these workplaces that are not 14 as safe, safer. 15 So thank you so much. 16 HELEN ROSENTHAL: Thank you. 17 It doesn't happen unless people like you lead 18 the charge. Right? 19 Hasn't happened prior to your being in 20 office, tells you something. 21 And -- yeah. 22 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMOTAS: Councilwoman, thank 23 you for your leadership on this issue. 24 2009, it was 10 years ago. It's about time 25 that the State caught up to what the City did, what 632 1 the City did all that time ago. 2 I have a question about sexual-harassment 3 policies and -- for you. 4 Does the City require updates to those 5 policies on a regular basis? 6 HELEN ROSENTHAL: Update to the policy, or 7 update to the complainant, which was another issue 8 that was raised today? 9 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMOTAS: I know, with respect 10 to the Assembly, we just went through a renewed 11 version of renewing our policy. 12 I know, because I worked on it extensively. 13 And the one thing that we were able to do is, 14 provide additional examples of what "offensive," you 15 know, "harassing behavior" is. 16 One example, that actually we heard today 17 during testimony, is when you're asked repeatedly 18 for social interaction, and whether you're 19 approached in person or with social media. 20 And I thought it was important to update the 21 Assembly's policy, just as we're going through 22 training, for our own members, but also for staff, 23 for people to understand that that's inappropriate, 24 and can constitute harassment. 25 And it's my belief that, not only state 633 1 agencies, but all agencies, should be looking at 2 these policies regularly, at least, you know, every 3 two years, potentially, every year, because you hear 4 about certain situations that -- examples, that, 5 sometimes, you know, you put a policy in place, 6 some -- a lot of us are lawyers here -- you read the 7 explanation, and you think you understand, but it's 8 different when somebody explains or gives you an 9 example, because, then, you can really understand 10 that, and understand whether you've observed that 11 behavior, or you might have done it yourself. 12 So, again, that's why I would love for you to 13 go back and look at whether the City requires 14 updates -- regular updates to the policy; where, 15 I know for the fact the State doesn't. 16 But I would welcome if you would do that for 17 the City as well. 18 HELEN ROSENTHAL: Yeah, I'm going back to my 19 office now, so I'll be submitting that idea. 20 And, you know, it's so interesting, and you 21 brought this out, you know, as lawyers, I guess, or 22 as legislators, we can make these directives, but we 23 can't write the rules. 24 I mean, that really is the administration's 25 job to do the actual writing of the rules. 634 1 And we -- you know, I like the idea of 2 updates, because, if they're public, then it forces 3 them to say, very publicly: Here's what the rules 4 are, here's the date. 5 So that, then, as legislators, in our 6 oversight capacity, we can say, That's not good 7 enough. 8 Thank you. 9 ASSEMBLYWOMAN SIMOTAS: Thank you. 10 SENATOR BIAGGI: Thank you so much. 11 Up next is Black Women's Blueprint, Decrim 12 New York, and Kingsborough Community College. 13 If any of these groups are still here, you 14 are second-to-last, and we are so grateful for you. 15 Oh, and New York City Anti-Violence Project 16 as well. 17 LEEJA CARTER, Ph.D.: Good evening. 18 My name is Dr. Leeja Carter. I'm here on 19 behalf of Black Women's Blueprint. 20 Founded in 2008, Black Women's Blueprint 21 works to place Black women and girls' lives and 22 struggles squarely within the context of larger 23 racial-justice concerns, and is committed to 24 building movements where gender matters in 25 social-justice organizing, so that all members of 635 1 Black communities achieve social, political, and 2 economic equity. 3 We are the conveners of the Black Women's 4 Truth and Reconciliation Commission held three years 5 ago at the United Nations, as well as the March for 6 Black Women, which was held right outside this very 7 room in 2018. 8 With recent federal administration's threats 9 to make vital cuts to anti-rape, anti-battery, and 10 anti-stalking service programs, guaranteed by the 11 Violence Against Women Act, we are running out of 12 places to turn to for safety and justice. 13 New York must be on the front lines of 14 protecting the rights of its most marginalized 15 residents. 16 Women and girls in our communities are under 17 siege. We need policymakers to listen to them, and 18 we need to institute mechanisms for public 19 involvement and oversight over any and all gender- 20 and racial-equity efforts. 21 The #MeToo movement has created a necessary 22 conversation on sexual harassment in the workplace; 23 however, women of color, especially immigrant women 24 of color, and those working in lower-paying jobs, 25 are often left out of the conversation. 636 1 Women working in the food-service industry, 2 blue-collar jobs, and factories are often 3 overlooked, further marginalizing their experiences. 4 It's time that we centered the experiences of 5 those -- of our most marginal women, making their 6 lives, needs, and experiences visible. 7 As women continue to report, seek support, 8 and ways to address workplace cultures that violate 9 their most basic rights, we have to dismantle the 10 misogyny and patriarchy that lives between our 11 sheets, sits at the counter and bars of our 12 neighborhood businesses, lurks in our parks, and 13 violates women that walk through them day and night. 14 To where do we run when offices and 15 restaurants foster a culture of harassment and 16 violation? 17 There is risk in bystander intervention, and 18 innocent bystanders also fear for their lives in 19 those moments of advocacy. 20 We must center community and systematic 21 accountability for the protection of our women. 22 Regarding prevention, recognizing that few 23 resources exist that are culturally relevant and 24 focus on preventing harassment and sexual assault 25 before it occurs, we developed innovative programs 637 1 focused on identifying and preventing sexual 2 violence before it occurs. 3 Our Institute for Gender and Culture delivers 4 prevention education and curricula based on an 5 understanding of the complex interplay between the 6 individual, relational, social, cultural, 7 environmental, historical, and persistent structural 8 factors that influence the spectrum of 9 discrimination, oppression, and violence that impact 10 people's lives. 11 We specialize in liberatory bystander 12 intervention models, transformative and healing 13 models, as well as asset-based 14 community-accountability models. 15 Using proven effective pedagogy and 16 methodologies, our institute works to equip people, 17 groups, and organizations with the framework for 18 developing strategies anchored in civil and human 19 rights as key points for intervention. 20 We are grateful to you all for calling this 21 hearing, to give further light and conversation and 22 hope to creating the necessary change that benefits 23 women in our state. 24 Thank you. 25 DR. RED WASHBURN: Good evening, everyone. 638 1 I want to thank you for listening to my 2 testimony. 3 In particular, I am grateful for 4 Assemblymember Simon's points about higher 5 education, Assemblymember Quart's points on 6 retaliation, Assemblymember Gottfried's and 7 Assemblymember Niou's points on GENDA and trans 8 issues. 9 I want to clarify that I am not representing 10 Kingsborough; but, rather, testifying about my 11 experience of gender-based violence there as an 12 employee. 13 My name is Dr. Red Washburn. I am a 14 transgender, non-conforming, and non-binary 15 associate professor of English, and the director of 16 Women and Gender Studies at Kingsborough Community 17 College. 18 The concentration, the first of its kind in 19 CUNY, is celebrating its 25th anniversary this year, 20 together with the 50th anniversary of Stonewall. 21 I want to underscore that, while we're 22 talking about sexual harassment, it also has 23 important implications for transgender, 24 non-conforming, and non-binary people in terms of 25 both sexual harassment, harassment in general, and 639 1 gender identity-based issues. 2 Six months after I came out as trans at work, 3 by requesting a name, gender, and pronoun change, 4 and sharing that I was getting top surgery, 5 Kingsborough's administration announced it was 6 defunding women and gender studies. 7 I suspected that I would face transphobia, so 8 I waited until after tenure to come out on campus as 9 trans. 10 It turned out that my suspicions were 11 correct. 12 I filed a complaint regarding my concerns as 13 an employee. I filed with the New York City 14 Commission on Human Rights, and I did that in 15 November. I'm still going through that slow process 16 while the harassment and retaliation is ongoing. 17 However, I also feel that I must speak out as 18 a citizen of the city, regarding the harm being done 19 to our students, your children, and to our precious 20 higher-education system. 21 As I have fought for students to have access 22 to women and gender studies, the administration has 23 increased its harassment and retaliation, not only 24 against me, but against our students, and against 25 women and gender studies programs. 640 1 Kingsborough's administration has 2 discriminated against me during my transition, 3 public safety. Ordered me to come in for an 4 investigation when I was on annual leave, and on 5 post-surgical bedrest. 6 The administration would not update my name 7 in its system, its directory, and its course 8 offerings. 9 It switched my teaching schedule one day 10 before the fall semester. 11 It repurposed the women and gender studies 12 office the first week of fall classes; changed the 13 locks the week after my revision surgery, just 14 before the spring semester started; and put all the 15 women and gender studies archives and my belongings 16 in storage. 17 It recently blocked me from making curricular 18 decisions as a director. 19 I still don't have a suitable office. 20 They temporarily put me in a storage office 21 next to a high-voltage, "Danger, Keep Out," closet 22 that made me break out in hives. 23 Harassment based on gender identity or 24 disability, and retaliation for complaints of 25 discrimination, runs contrary to New York law and 641 1 CUNY regulations. 2 And these actions ignored my surgeon's and 3 therapist directives. 4 Kingsborough still has me listed under my 5 deadname, and calls me by my deadname, my former 6 name, publicly as well. 7 Earlier this year, New York State passed the 8 Gender Expression Non-Discrimination Act after a 9 nearly two-decade battle led by trans advocates. 10 Last year, New York City Council passed bills 11 to create non-binary birth certificates, and educate 12 business owners on requirements for all-gender 13 restrooms. 14 Two years ago, CUNY issued a statement to 15 project -- to protect transgender and 16 gender non-conforming students. 17 Despite the anti-trans sentiments and 18 regressive policies of our federal administration, 19 New York City has taken bold steps to protect trans 20 New Yorkers, and yet Kingsborough has fallen out of 21 step with these protection, both in CUNY and in 22 New York, administratively. 23 The non-discrimination law is excellent, and 24 key; however, an order to get justice and support 25 with reporting, we need these bills under discussion 642 1 to pass today. 2 The sustained harassment has caused me, my 3 students, and the women and gender studies program 4 much harm. It created the need for me to take sick 5 leave in the fall, and get a second revision surgery 6 this winter. 7 Not even a month post op, there's a 8 likelihood that I will require yet another, a third 9 procedure, in the late spring. 10 At this political juncture of #MeToo, 11 Times Up, Black Lives Matter, Trans Lives Matter, 12 and sanctuary campus movements, women and gender 13 studies, and I would argue, other area-based 14 studies, is more relevant than ever. 15 Community-college students deserve women and 16 gender studies for the pleasure of learning, for 17 opportunities to transfer, and for access to work. 18 And the shrinking academic opportunities 19 connected to social justice for LGBTQ and women 20 students, the majority of whom are working-class 21 students of color, at this moment, is 22 unconscionable. 23 I am not alone here. 24 The Association of American University 25 Professors issued a report on gender and gender 643 1 studies. 2 We have received the overwhelming support 3 from across the CUNYs, from women and gender studies 4 faculty and students; the National Women Studies 5 Association; and other prominent faculty across the 6 nation, in the form of letters, petitions, lectures, 7 and roundtables, among forthcoming events tied to 8 NWSA's Gender Studies Under Fire. 9 The institutional transphobia, coupled with 10 Kingsborough's sexist devaluing of women and gender 11 studies, elucidates that the college administration 12 has created a hostile environment for LGBTQ students 13 who are both interested in these issues, along with 14 multiculturalism and diversity, and trying to live 15 their truths. 16 It is neither a safe place for gender 17 non-conforming and trans faculty to work, nor LGBTQ 18 and WGS students to learn. 19 Thank you for hearing my testimony. 20 Today's hearings have given me much hope for 21 women, trans, and queer survivors of violence to 22 receive the justice that we all deserve, and to heal 23 in this process. 24 I'm honored to be a part of it. 25 Thank you. 644 1 AUDACIA RAY: Good evening. 2 My name is Audacia Ray, and I'm the director 3 of community organizing and public advocacy of the 4 New York City Anti-Violence Project. 5 AVP is an almost 40-year-old organization 6 that provides services, legal services, counseling 7 services, all which are free, to LGBTQ survivors of 8 hate, intimate-partner, and sexual violence. 9 And, I also serve as a founding steering 10 committee member of Decrim New York, which is a 11 coalition to decriminalize, decarcerate, and 12 destigmatize sex work in New York. 13 I am a queer woman, and, I'm a former sex 14 worker. I am a survivor of sexual and 15 intimate-partner violence, so I have skin in the 16 game of all these things. 17 And, today, I am going to testify a little 18 bit about the impacts of workplace sexual harassment 19 on people in the sex trades, especially people who 20 identify as LGBTQ. 21 AVP and, of course, Decrim New York, are very 22 clear that sex work is work, and that people who 23 participate in the sex trades are doing so to meet 24 their economic and survival needs. 25 I also acknowledge that all labor under 645 1 capitalism is exploitation, and sex trades are part 2 of that. 3 Sexual harassment and violence in the sex 4 trades show up in ways that are both unique to the 5 industry and familiar to other workers. 6 A lot of the stuff I've heard today about 7 domestic workers, about people in the modeling 8 industry, and lots of other industries, sound 9 really, really familiar to me as a former sex 10 worker. 11 And, so, because of this widespread 12 employment discrimination for LGBTQ people, LGBTQ 13 communities disproportionately engage in sex work 14 for survival. And this is particularly true for 15 trans and GNC people. 16 AVP's report, "Individual Struggles, 17 Widespread Injustice," which my colleague Briana 18 will talk about more extensively, found that 19 22 percent of trans and gender non-conforming people 20 who were survey respondents were unemployed, and 21 this is in New York City, over the past two years. 22 The survey was done in 2016-2017, so it's very 23 recent. 24 And that rate, 22 percent, is more than 25 5 times higher than the unemployment rate in 646 1 New York City. 2 And so, as a result, lots of TGNC people 3 engage in sex work to survive. 4 Another report to cite, "Meaningful Work," 5 which is co-published by the National Center for 6 Trans Equality, and also the Red Umbrella Project, 7 an organization I used to run, found that 40 percent 8 of Black trans people self-report having engaged in 9 the sex trades. 10 And, finally, the Urban Justice -- or, the 11 Urban Institute report, "Surviving the Streets of 12 New York," found that LGBTQ youth in New York 13 participate in the sex trade at 7 to 8 times the 14 rate of their peers. 15 We know that LGBTQ people participate in the 16 sex trades by choice, circumstance, and coercion, 17 but because the sex trades are criminalized and 18 stigmatized, people who experience discrimination, 19 labor exploitation, and sexual violence on their 20 jobs, and because of their jobs, have little 21 recourse. 22 People in the sex trades are really skilled 23 at negotiating boundaries, and communicating was 24 acceptable to them in the context of the exchange of 25 sexual labor for money. 647 1 However, because criminalization, in 2 combination with other factors, that make workers 3 vulnerable, like immigration status, race, and 4 gender identity, people in the sex trades can't 5 safely report the harassment that happens in their 6 workplaces. 7 Criminalization really flattens the 8 understanding of what qualifies as harassment and 9 discrimination in a workplace where people are 10 trading sex or selling a fantasy of sex. 11 When management in a massage parlor pressures 12 workers to (indiscernible) sex acts that they don't 13 want to perform in order to maintain their 14 employment, that is harassment. 15 When a dancer is told she cannot get a shift 16 in the strip club she works in because she's Black, 17 and there's already a Black dancer scheduled for 18 that shift, that is discrimination. 19 And when an independent escort consents to 20 meet a client in his hotel room for an hour, and he 21 removes the condom they agreed on, that is violence. 22 I'm going to briefly share an experience of 23 harassment that I experienced. There were a lot to 24 choose from. 25 So, I chose this one, because it is about me 648 1 being a sex worker, but it's also -- takes place in 2 a space that was, essentially, kind of a workspace 3 to me, and so that felt significant. 4 And I also want to say that, there is a lot 5 of harassment that happens on the job, but there's 6 also harassment that happens as a result of being 7 any kind of visible sex worker. 8 So, for me, while I was a graduate student at 9 Columbia, I was doing sex work to support myself. 10 And, although I was already an actress at the 11 time, I wanted to keep my identity as a sex worker 12 private at school, because I felt like it could do 13 bad things for me. 14 One of my fellow students had connected the 15 dots. I was very public online. I had, you know, 16 like, ads as a sex worker, and had done porn. 17 And so he connected that identity to my 18 identity on campus, and started printing out copies 19 of my ads and photographs of me, and information 20 about me from the Internet, and spreading them 21 around campus. And, also, tracked my schedule. 22 So he would, like, walk by and drop a bunch 23 of papers, printouts, of my sex work, around campus 24 and near me where I was studying. 25 And it created a really terrifying 649 1 environment for me. 2 And in order for me to be able to get any 3 recourse for it, I would have had to tell people 4 that I was a sex worker. 5 So I didn't. 6 And, I went to campus much less. I ended up 7 going part-time. It took me much longer to finish 8 my degree. 9 And I just felt like I had -- I had no 10 recourse. 11 And, you know, and I'm fairly privileged. 12 I'm White, I'm sis gender. I was going to school at 13 Columbia. 14 And I just felt like I had no way to push 15 back against this. 16 And that harassment really impacted my health 17 and well-being while it was going on. 18 And I also in that, want to make a call back 19 to some of the earlier conversation around the 20 statute of limitations, because this -- you know, 21 this has come up a couple of times today, and, I was 22 thinking about this in the context of being an 23 activist, and having a feminist consciousness. 24 And I know that, at the time, I felt, like, 25 this is bad, but it's not that bad. And, also, that 650 1 it felt, like, well, it is -- it just -- it is what 2 it is. And, this is just -- this is just this thing 3 that I've accepted, that might be part of this 4 career, or this work, that I'm doing. 5 And so, if that's true for me, while I was 6 also very much engaged, an activist, it's definitely 7 true for lots of folks who can't quite name, even to 8 themselves, what is happening to them. 9 And so it's really important to expand that 10 statute of limitations, because it often takes a 11 long time for people to even understand what's going 12 on, and name it to themselves, much less to figure 13 out, okay, I'm going to report this and start 14 talking to other people about it. 15 So that's something, that I just really 16 wanted to underscore that. 17 So, of course, there are lots of experiences 18 like mine, and much worse, in the sex industry. 19 And I want to end by saying: 20 That criminalizing the whole sex industry 21 does not help workers in my situation, or in other 22 situations. 23 And, you know, ensuring that these bills that 24 are under discussion can create pathways to 25 reporting harassment, and receiving support for 651 1 people in the sex trades, is important. 2 AVP and Decrim NY advocate that the 3 sexual-harassment workgroup's entire legislative 4 agenda pass. 5 But the State also must pass legislation that 6 decriminalizes sex work, because that will help 7 ensure that sex work is recognized as work. 8 A lot of other workers that talked today, 9 there's no question that their work is work. 10 And there is still that question for people 11 in the sex trades, and, decriminalizing it would 12 help to resolve some of that. 13 So, in general, in order for 14 sexual-harassment legislation to work, it has to 15 work for every member of the workforce, and that 16 that has to include people in the sex trades, and 17 people who work in informal labor, and people who 18 are marginalized by being LGBTQ, by being immigrant, 19 and being survivors. 20 Thank you. 21 BRIANA SILBERBERG: Hi. 22 Thank you for having us all here today. 23 My name is Briana Silberberg. I'm a 24 community organizer at AVP. I'm a transgender 25 woman. 652 1 Very appreciative, and glad to have the 2 opportunity to speak to everyone today. 3 As Audacia mentioned, we have this report 4 out, "Individual Struggles, Widespread Injustice: 5 Trans and Gender Non-Conforming People's Experience 6 of Systemic Employment Discrimination in New York 7 City." 8 I've included a copy of it for everyone with 9 my testimony, so you can go through it and read it 10 at your leisure and pleasure, afterwards or during. 11 What we wanted to go over in this is that, in 12 our work, and through the report, AVP has noticed a 13 few trends about how sexual harassment uniquely 14 affects transgender, gender non-conforming, and 15 non-binary (TGNCNB) communities, in ways that we 16 find very disturbing, that warrant the attention of 17 the Legislature. 18 And we want to make it clear also that, 19 TGNCNB people experience both, you know, sexual 20 harassment and harassment based on our gender 21 identities. And that these forms of harassment are 22 not the same thing, and that we have to be cognizant 23 of that when we're considering these issues. 24 So, often we hear solely about these issues, 25 and discrimination, solely from the perspective of 653 1 the hiring process. 2 I wanted to share with you today some of the 3 things that we have in the report, about on-the-job 4 harassment for TGNCNB people in the workplace, and 5 touching on just not harassment, but also the 6 reporting piece, and what factors contribute to, if 7 people are reporting, and also why they might not, 8 in cases that they don't. 9 So when it comes to harassment in the 10 workplace, what we're seeing is that -- 11 And we had 118 TGNCNB respondents in this, 12 and as Audacia said, this was collected between 2016 13 and 2017. 14 -- so of our respondents: 15 33 percent of them reported that they 16 received unwanted sexual comments in the workplace. 17 65 percent of the respondents said that they 18 were outed as TGNCNB to at least one person in the 19 workplace, 81 percent through an in-person 20 disclosure. 21 But 63 percent of our respondents, who said 22 they were not out to anyone at work as TGNCNB, said 23 that they did so because of barriers that they felt 24 were in their way. 25 56 percent of those who were not out at work 654 1 said that they cited fear of discrimination as their 2 main barrier as to why they were not coming out. 3 About half of respondents listed uncertainty 4 of co-workers, supervisor, responses. No desire to 5 disclose. Anxiety and isolation as contributing 6 factors there. 7 When it came to folks's (sic) experiences 8 with human resources, what we were seeing were, of 9 the respondents who were employed in workplaces that 10 HR departments, 76 percent did not actually report a 11 discriminatory incident to HR. 12 And although the number of respondents who 13 reported was very small, it was only 13 of those 14 respondents, 77 percent of the discrimination 15 reported to HR departments did not end, and 16 77 percent of respondents felt that HR responses 17 were inadequate. 18 And we were seeing a lot of listed reasons 19 from people, why they weren't reporting. 20 Some of the things that people told us were, 21 and these are quotes: 22 HR is actively transphobic. 23 HR is useless, and is way less sensitive or 24 competent than my co-workers or supervisors. The 25 last place I would go with a sensitive issue. So 655 1 far removed from my actual workplace. 2 HR will tell others, without my knowledge or 3 consent, and I don't want to deal with that or be 4 outed (indiscernible). 5 I don't want people to think I am difficult 6 to have around, or a problem, or someone who they 7 want to have stressed out about as a result of my 8 gender. 9 I was too traumatized. 10 My supervisor instructed me not to tell HR. 11 When it came also to issues where people were 12 factoring in supervisor respondent -- responses, of 13 our respondents who actually had a supervisor, and 14 were in a workplace where that was a part of it, 15 42 percent reported incidence of discrimination to 16 the supervisor. 17 However, of the 58 percent of people who did 18 not report it to their supervisor, 46 percent of 19 those respondents cited they are not -- they did not 20 do so because of complaints they had about their 21 supervisor. 22 When respondents were reporting to their 23 super -- reported to their supervisor, the 24 most-often reported follow up was a meeting or 25 mediation with the involved parties. 656 1 24 percent of respondents said they were 2 retaliated against for reporting an incident. 3 Reporting incidents did not lead to resolution. 4 71 percent of respondents continued to be 5 subjected to discrimination after reporting. 6 And 76 percent did not feel that their 7 supervisor's response was adequate. 8 When it came to other ways that people dealt 9 with these issues, only 32 percent of respondents 10 chose to directly confront the person or persons in 11 the workplace who discriminated against them. 12 After this conversation, 52 percent of 13 respondents said the discriminatory incidents 14 continued at the rate, and, 28 percent, that 15 discrimination got worse. 16 Only 4 percent of respondents filed a claim 17 with an outside agency, such as New York City's 18 Human Resources Administration or the New York City 19 Commission on Human Rights; although, in recent 20 years, the City has made efforts to increase 21 reporting through public-education efforts. 22 13 percent of respondents consulted a lawyer 23 about the discrimination they experienced. Of 24 those, about two-thirds had their cases taken on, 25 while