senate Bill S4830A

Clarifies conciliation procedures in cases when the recipient of public assistance programs refuses to comply with employment program requirements in a city having a population of one million or more persons

download pdf

Sponsor

Co-Sponsors

view all co-sponsors

Bill Status


  • Introduced
  • In Committee
  • On Floor Calendar
    • Passed Senate
    • Passed Assembly
  • Delivered to Governor
  • Signed/Vetoed by Governor
view actions

actions

  • 25 / Apr / 2013
    • REFERRED TO SOCIAL SERVICES
  • 31 / May / 2013
    • COMMITTEE DISCHARGED AND COMMITTED TO RULES
  • 08 / Jan / 2014
    • REFERRED TO SOCIAL SERVICES
  • 29 / May / 2014
    • REPORTED AND COMMITTED TO FINANCE
  • 16 / Jun / 2014
    • AMEND (T) AND RECOMMIT TO FINANCE
  • 16 / Jun / 2014
    • PRINT NUMBER 4830A
  • 19 / Jun / 2014
    • COMMITTEE DISCHARGED AND COMMITTED TO RULES
  • 19 / Jun / 2014
    • ORDERED TO THIRD READING CAL.1615
  • 19 / Jun / 2014
    • PASSED SENATE
  • 19 / Jun / 2014
    • DELIVERED TO ASSEMBLY
  • 19 / Jun / 2014
    • REFERRED TO WAYS AND MEANS

Summary

Clarifies conciliation procedures in cases when the recipient of public assistance programs refuses to comply with employment program requirements in a city having a population of one million or more persons.

do you support this bill?

Bill Details

See Assembly Version of this Bill:
A2669C
Versions:
S4830
S4830A
Legislative Cycle:
2013-2014
Current Committee:
Law Section:
Social Services Law
Laws Affected:
Add §§341-a & 342-a, amd §§341 & 342, Soc Serv L
Versions Introduced in Previous Legislative Cycles:
2011-2012: S6910, A3423A, A504
2009-2010: A11409, A11409, A1474
2007-2008: A547

Sponsor Memo

BILL NUMBER:S4830A

TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the social services law, in relation to
clarifying notice requirements, conciliation procedures and sanctions in
cases when the recipient of public assistance programs refuses to comply
with employment program requirements in a city having a population of
one million or more persons

PURPOSE OR GENERAL IDEA OF BILL: The bill enables New York City to
promote re-engagement of welfare recipients in welfare work activities
to-either avoid or end sanctions. This bill shifts the focus of the
local district to re-engaging clients as soon as Possible in work activ-
ities and facilitates the transition from welfare to work.

SUMMARY OF SPECIFIC PROVISIONS: This bill will only apply for the City
of New York

§ 1 - Amends Section 341 of the Social Services Law to:

* require agency to determine if there is an exemption, lack of child
care or transportation or an accommodation for disability before issuing
a re-engagement notice. Such re-engagement notice shall guarantee the
right of a participant to participate in a re-engagement process and
avoid a pro-rata reduction in public assistance benefits. Such process
shall mean the process through which the participant agrees to comply
with any requirements, give reasons for default or demonstrates
exemption at a conciliation conference. Such notice shall provide the
participant with ten days to request reengagement and indicate the
district has verified the availability of child care, transportation and
accommodations for disability at the time of default. It is further
provided that if a participant does not agree to comply, is not exempt
or the district determines that the default was willful and without good
cause ten days notice of intent shall be issued to discontinue or reduce
benefits. Such notice shall include the verifications listed above,
actions necessary to avoid discontinuance or reduction, including agree-
ing to comply, and the right to a fair hearing.

* prohibit sanction during the re-engagement process and establish that
if person is otherwise participating in work activities, then there
should be no sanction based on single infraction.

* retain conciliation, but only as the most formal tool that a client
could use to avoid a sanction.

* establish a written reminder of ability to comply after 30 days of
non-compliance.

* institute the right to cure by client either agreeing to comply or
notifying the district of their exemption.

§ 2 - Amends Section 342 of the Social Services Law to eliminate dura-
tional sanctions.

§ 5 - provides for an immediate effective date.

JUSTIFICATION: Currently, individuals receiving public assistance from
the City of New York may have their public assistance payments reduced
or stopped due to noncompliance with various rules promulgated by the
social services districts. These social services districts currently
implement these sanctions for certain specific durations.

These sanctions are punitive to the most at-risk and vulnerable members
of our society. When implemented; they remove the client's ability to
afford food, housing and various other public assistance guaranteed by
the State constitution. When these payments are revoked, it leads to
hunger in families an - often leads to the commencement of eviction
proceedings, which then increases the client's reliance on the social
services safety net due to their need for emergency food and shelter.

Under the current process, even where the client misses just one
appointment, the local social services district is required to expend
time and resources focused on sanctioning the client rather than re-en-
gaging the client in work activities as soon as possible. Not only would
this bill enable the local social services districts to focus time and
resources on the key goal of engagement, it would assist clients in
keeping on track with their work activities.

This bill allows for a more streamlined conciliation process by focusing
on re-engaging the client.

PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: 2010 Session - Similar to A.11409 which was
reported from Social Services to Codes
2012 Session - S.6910 - referred to Social Services, no further action.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Savings to the State.

EFFECTIVE DATE: This act shall take effect immediately.

view bill text
                    S T A T E   O F   N E W   Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________

                                 4830--A

                       2013-2014 Regular Sessions

                            I N  S E N A T E

                             April 25, 2013
                               ___________

Introduced  by  Sens.  SAVINO, AVELLA, KRUEGER, PARKER, STAVISKY -- read
  twice and ordered printed, and when printed to  be  committed  to  the
  Committee on Social Services -- recommitted to the Committee on Social
  Services  in accordance with Senate Rule 6, sec. 8 -- reported favora-
  bly from said committee and committed to the Committee on  Finance  --
  committee  discharged,  bill amended, ordered reprinted as amended and
  recommitted to said committee

AN ACT to amend the social  services  law,  in  relation  to  clarifying
  notice  requirements,  conciliation  procedures and sanctions in cases
  when the recipient of public assistance  programs  refuses  to  comply
  with  employment program requirements in a city having a population of
  one million or more persons

  THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND  ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

  Section  1. The social services law is amended by adding a new section
341-a to read as follows:
  S 341-A.  RE-ENGAGEMENT; CONCILIATION; REFUSAL TO PARTICIPATE.  1. THE
PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION SHALL APPLY TO PERSONS WHO ARE RESIDENTS OF A
CITY HAVING A POPULATION OF ONE MILLION OR MORE PEOPLE.
  2. (A) CONSISTENT WITH FEDERAL LAW AND REGULATIONS AND THIS TITLE,  IF
A  PARTICIPANT  HAS FAILED OR REFUSED TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF
THIS TITLE AND THE DISTRICT HAS DETERMINED THAT HE OR SHE IS NOT  EXEMPT
FROM  SUCH  REQUIREMENTS  AND  HAS VERIFIED THAT APPROPRIATE CHILD CARE,
TRANSPORTATION, AND ACCOMMODATIONS FOR DISABILITY WERE IN PLACE  AT  THE
TIME  OF  SUCH  FAILURE  OR  REFUSAL, THE SOCIAL SERVICES DISTRICT SHALL
ISSUE A RE-ENGAGEMENT NOTICE IN  PLAIN  LANGUAGE  INDICATING  THAT  SUCH
FAILURE  OR REFUSAL HAS TAKEN PLACE AND OF THE RIGHT OF SUCH PARTICIPANT
TO AVOID A PRO-RATA REDUCTION IN PUBLIC ASSISTANCE BENEFITS THROUGH  THE
RE-ENGAGEMENT  PROCESS.  "RE-ENGAGEMENT  PROCESS" SHALL MEAN THE PROCESS
THROUGH WHICH A PARTICIPANT MAY AVOID A  PRO-RATA  REDUCTION  IN  PUBLIC
ASSISTANCE  BENEFITS BY AGREEING TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS
TITLE CONSISTENT WITH ANY MEDICAL CONDITION WHICH MAY LIMIT THE INDIVID-
UAL'S ABILITY TO  PARTICIPATE  IN  WORK  ACTIVITIES,  BY  NOTIFYING  THE
DISTRICT  THAT HE OR SHE HAS BECOME EXEMPT FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS

 EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                      [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                           LBD00785-07-4

S. 4830--A                          2

TITLE, OR BY RESOLVING THE REASONS FOR SUCH  FAILURE  OR  REFUSAL  AT  A
CONCILIATION CONFERENCE.  THE NOTICE SHALL INDICATE THAT THE PARTICIPANT
HAS  TEN  DAYS  TO  REQUEST RE-ENGAGEMENT WITH THE DISTRICT.  THE NOTICE
SHALL  INDICATE THE SPECIFIC INSTANCE OR INSTANCES OF WILLFUL REFUSAL OR
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITHOUT GOOD CAUSE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS TITLE
AND THE NECESSARY ACTIONS  THAT  MUST  BE  TAKEN  TO  AVOID  A  PRO-RATA
REDUCTION  IN  PUBLIC  ASSISTANCE BENEFITS AND THE DISTRICT HAS VERIFIED
THAT APPROPRIATE CHILD CARE, TRANSPORTATION AND ACCOMMODATIONS FOR DISA-
BILITY WERE IN PLACE AT THE TIME OF SUCH FAILURE OR REFUSAL.
  (1) IF A PARTICIPANT CHOOSES TO AVOID A PRO-RATA REDUCTION  IN  PUBLIC
ASSISTANCE  BENEFITS  THROUGH  A CONCILIATION CONFERENCE, IT WILL BE THE
RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PARTICIPANT TO GIVE REASONS FOR  SUCH  FAILURE  OR
REFUSAL.   THE RE-ENGAGEMENT NOTICE SHALL ALSO INCLUDE AN EXPLANATION IN
PLAIN LANGUAGE OF WHAT WOULD CONSTITUTE GOOD  CAUSE  FOR  NON-COMPLIANCE
AND  EXAMPLES  OF  ACCEPTABLE  FORMS  OF  EVIDENCE  THAT  MAY WARRANT AN
EXEMPTION FROM WORK ACTIVITIES, INCLUDING EVIDENCE OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE,
AND PHYSICAL OR MENTAL HEALTH LIMITATIONS THAT MAY BE  PROVIDED  AT  THE
CONCILIATION  CONFERENCE  TO  DEMONSTRATE SUCH GOOD CAUSE FOR FAILURE TO
COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS TITLE.    UNLESS  AS  PART  OF  THE
RE-ENGAGEMENT  PROCESS THE PARTICIPANT DOES NOT AGREE TO COMPLY, HAS NOT
BECOME EXEMPT OR THE DISTRICT DETERMINES AS A RESULT OF THE CONCILIATION
CONFERENCE THAT SUCH FAILURE OR REFUSAL WAS  WILLFUL  AND  WITHOUT  GOOD
CAUSE, NO FURTHER ACTION SHALL BE TAKEN.
  (2)  IF  THE PARTICIPANT DOES NOT CONTACT THE DISTRICT WITHIN TEN DAYS
OF THE RE-ENGAGEMENT NOTICE, THE DISTRICT SHALL MAKE A FINDING OF WHETH-
ER THE ALLEGED FAILURE OR REFUSAL TO COMPLY WAS WILLFUL AND WITHOUT GOOD
CAUSE AND SHALL CONSIDER ANY EVIDENCE IN THE POSSESSION OF THE  DISTRICT
INDICATING THAT THE PARTICIPANT HAS GOOD CAUSE AND IF THE PARTICIPANT IS
OTHERWISE PARTICIPATING IN WORK ACTIVITIES, THERE SHALL BE NO FINDING OF
WILLFULNESS  WITHOUT GOOD CAUSE BASED ON A SINGLE APPOINTMENT OR INFRAC-
TION.
  (B) IF THE DISTRICT DETERMINES THAT SUCH FAILURE OR REFUSAL WAS  WILL-
FUL  AND  WITHOUT GOOD CAUSE, AND THAT THE INDIVIDUAL IS NOT EXEMPT FROM
THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS TITLE, THE DISTRICT SHALL NOTIFY  SUCH  PARTIC-
IPANT  IN  WRITING,  IN PLAIN LANGUAGE AND IN A MANNER DISTINCT FROM ANY
PREVIOUS NOTICE, BY ISSUING TEN DAYS NOTICE OF ITS INTENT TO DISCONTINUE
OR REDUCE ASSISTANCE. SUCH NOTICE SHALL INCLUDE  THE  REASONS  FOR  SUCH
DETERMINATION,  THE SPECIFIC INSTANCE OR INSTANCES OF WILLFUL REFUSAL OR
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITHOUT GOOD  CAUSE  WITH  THE  REQUIREMENTS  OF  THIS
TITLE,  SHALL  VERIFY  THAT  APPROPRIATE  CHILD CARE, TRANSPORTATION AND
ACCOMMODATIONS FOR DISABILITY WERE IN PLACE AT THE TIME OF SUCH  FAILURE
OR  REFUSAL,  AND  SPECIFY  THE  NECESSARY ACTIONS THAT MUST BE TAKEN TO
AVOID A PRO-RATA REDUCTION  IN  PUBLIC  ASSISTANCE  BENEFITS,  INCLUDING
AGREEING  TO  COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS TITLE CONSISTENT WITH
ANY MEDICAL CONDITION  WHICH  MAY  LIMIT  THE  INDIVIDUAL'S  ABILITY  TO
PARTICIPATE  IN WORK ACTIVITIES OR NOTIFYING THE DISTRICT THAT HE OR SHE
HAS BECOME EXEMPT FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS TITLE AND THE RIGHT TO A
FAIR HEARING RELATING TO SUCH DISCONTINUANCE OR REDUCTION.
  3. (A) THE DEPARTMENT SHALL ESTABLISH  IN  REGULATION  A  CONCILIATION
PROCEDURE  FOR  THE  RESOLUTION  OF  DISPUTES RELATED TO AN INDIVIDUAL'S
PARTICIPATION IN PROGRAMS PURSUANT TO THIS TITLE.
  (B) THE DISTRICT SHALL CONTRACT WITH AN INDEPENDENT  ENTITY,  APPROVED
BY THE DEPARTMENT, OR SHALL USE DESIGNATED TRAINED STAFF AT THE SUPERVI-
SORY  LEVEL WHO HAVE NO DIRECT RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE PARTICIPANT'S CASE
TO MEDIATE DISPUTES IN THE CONCILIATION CONFERENCE.

S. 4830--A                          3

  (C) IF A PARTICIPANT'S DISPUTE CANNOT BE RESOLVED THROUGH SUCH CONCIL-
IATION PROCEDURE, AN OPPORTUNITY FOR A FAIR HEARING SHALL  BE  PROVIDED.
NO  SANCTION  RELATING  TO THE SUBJECT DISPUTE MAY BE IMPOSED DURING THE
RE-ENGAGEMENT PROCESS.
  4.  WHEN  ANY  PARTICIPANT  REQUIRED TO PARTICIPATE IN WORK ACTIVITIES
FAILS TO COMPLY WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS TITLE, THE  SOCIAL  SERVICES
DISTRICT  SHALL  TAKE  SUCH ACTIONS AS PRESCRIBED BY APPROPRIATE FEDERAL
LAW AND REGULATION AND THIS TITLE.
  5.  CONSISTENT WITH FEDERAL LAW AND  THIS  TITLE,  A  SOCIAL  SERVICES
DISTRICT SHALL PROVIDE TO THOSE PARTICIPANTS WHOSE FAILURE TO COMPLY HAS
CONTINUED  FOR THIRTY DAYS OR LONGER A WRITTEN REMINDER OF THE OPTION TO
END A SANCTION BY TERMINATING THE FAILURE  TO  COMPLY  AS  SPECIFIED  IN
SUBDIVISION  TWO  OF  THIS  SECTION.  SUCH  NOTICE SHALL ADVISE THAT THE
PARTICIPANT MAY IMMEDIATELY TERMINATE THE SANCTION BY EITHER AGREEING TO
COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS TITLE CONSISTENT WITH  ANY  MEDICAL
CONDITION  WHICH  MAY  LIMIT  THE INDIVIDUAL'S ABILITY TO PARTICIPATE IN
WORK ACTIVITIES OR NOTIFYING THE DISTRICT THAT  HE  OR  SHE  HAS  BECOME
EXEMPT FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS TITLE.
  6.    CONSISTENT  WITH  FEDERAL  LAW AND REGULATION AND THIS TITLE, NO
NOTICE SHALL BE ISSUED AS SPECIFIED IN SUBDIVISION TWO OF  THIS  SECTION
UNLESS IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED THAT THE INDIVIDUAL IS NOT EXEMPT FROM THE
REQUIREMENTS  OF  THIS  TITLE  AND HAS DETERMINED THAT APPROPRIATE CHILD
CARE, TRANSPORTATION AND ACCOMMODATIONS FOR DISABILITY WERE IN PLACE  AT
THE  TIME  OF SUCH FAILURE OR REFUSAL TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF
THIS TITLE AND NO ACTION SHALL BE TAKEN PURSUANT  TO  THIS  SECTION  FOR
FAILURE  TO  PARTICIPATE  IN THE PROGRAM OR REFUSAL TO ACCEPT EMPLOYMENT
IF:
  (A) CHILD CARE FOR A CHILD UNDER AGE THIRTEEN (OR  DAY  CARE  FOR  ANY
INCAPACITATED  INDIVIDUAL  LIVING IN THE SAME HOME AS A DEPENDENT CHILD)
IS NECESSARY FOR AN INDIVIDUAL TO PARTICIPATE OR CONTINUE  PARTICIPATION
IN  ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO THIS TITLE OR ACCEPT EMPLOYMENT AND SUCH CARE
IS NOT AVAILABLE AND THE SOCIAL SERVICES DISTRICT FAILS TO PROVIDE  SUCH
CARE;
  (B)  (1)  THE EMPLOYMENT WOULD RESULT IN THE FAMILY OF THE PARTICIPANT
EXPERIENCING A NET LOSS OF CASH INCOME; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, A PARTICIPANT
MAY NOT CLAIM GOOD CAUSE UNDER THIS PARAGRAPH  IF  THE  SOCIAL  SERVICES
DISTRICT  ASSURES THAT THE FAMILY WILL NOT EXPERIENCE A NET LOSS OF CASH
INCOME BY MAKING A SUPPLEMENTAL PAYMENT;
  (2) NET LOSS OF CASH INCOME RESULTS IF THE FAMILY'S GROSS INCOME  LESS
NECESSARY  WORK-RELATED  EXPENSES  IS  LESS THAN THE CASH ASSISTANCE THE
PARTICIPANT WAS RECEIVING AT THE TIME THE OFFER OF EMPLOYMENT  IS  MADE;
OR
  (C)  THE  PARTICIPANT  MEETS OTHER GROUNDS FOR GOOD CAUSE SET FORTH BY
THE DEPARTMENT IN ITS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR THIS  TITLE  WHICH,  AT  A
MINIMUM, MUST DESCRIBE WHAT CIRCUMSTANCES BEYOND THE HOUSEHOLD'S CONTROL
WILL CONSTITUTE "GOOD CAUSE".
  S 2. Section 341 of the social services law is amended by adding a new
subdivision 7 to read as follows:
  7.  THE  PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION SHALL NOT APPLY TO PERSONS WHO ARE
RESIDENTS OF A CITY HAVING A POPULATION OF ONE MILLION OR MORE PEOPLE.
  S 3. The social services law is amended by adding a new section  342-a
to read as follows:
  S  342-A.  NONCOMPLIANCE  WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS TITLE.  1. THE
PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION SHALL APPLY TO PERSONS WHO ARE RESIDENTS OF A
CITY HAVING A POPULATION OF ONE MILLION OR MORE PEOPLE.

S. 4830--A                          4

  2. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION AN INDIVIDUAL WHO
IS REQUIRED TO PARTICIPATE IN WORK ACTIVITIES  SHALL  BE  INELIGIBLE  TO
RECEIVE  PUBLIC  ASSISTANCE  IF  HE OR SHE FAILS TO COMPLY, WITHOUT GOOD
CAUSE, WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS TITLE AND THE DISTRICT  HAS  DETER-
MINED  THAT HE OR SHE IS NOT EXEMPT FROM SUCH REQUIREMENTS AND HAS VERI-
FIED THAT APPROPRIATE CHILD CARE, TRANSPORTATION, AND ACCOMMODATIONS FOR
DISABILITY WERE IN PLACE AT THE TIME OF SUCH FAILURE  OR  REFUSAL.  SUCH
INELIGIBILITY  SHALL  BE  FOR  THE  AMOUNT  AND PERIOD SPECIFIED IN THIS
SECTION. GOOD CAUSE FOR FAILING TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF  THIS
TITLE  SHALL  BE  DEFINED  IN DEPARTMENT REGULATIONS, PROVIDED, HOWEVER,
THAT THE PARENT OR CARETAKER RELATIVE OF A CHILD UNDER THIRTEEN YEARS OF
AGE SHALL NOT BE SUBJECT TO THE INELIGIBILITY PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION
IF THE INDIVIDUAL CAN DEMONSTRATE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REGULATIONS OF
THE OFFICE OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, THAT LACK OF AVAILABLE CHILD
CARE PREVENTS SUCH INDIVIDUAL FROM COMPLYING WITH THE WORK  REQUIREMENTS
OF THIS TITLE. THE PARENT OR CARETAKER RELATIVE SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR
LOCATING  THE CHILD CARE NEEDED TO MEET THE WORK REQUIREMENTS; PROVIDED,
HOWEVER, THAT THE RELEVANT SOCIAL  SERVICES  DISTRICT  SHALL  PROVIDE  A
PARENT  OR  CARETAKER  RELATIVE  WHO DEMONSTRATES AN INABILITY TO OBTAIN
NEEDED CHILD CARE WITH A CHOICE OF TWO PROVIDERS, AT LEAST ONE OF  WHICH
WILL BE A REGULATED PROVIDER.
  3.  IN  THE CASE OF AN APPLICANT FOR OR RECIPIENT OF PUBLIC ASSISTANCE
WHOM THE DISTRICT HAS DETERMINED IS NOT EXEMPT FROM THE REQUIREMENTS  OF
THIS  TITLE  AND  WHO IS A PARENT OR CARETAKER OF A DEPENDENT CHILD, THE
PUBLIC ASSISTANCE BENEFITS OTHERWISE AVAILABLE TO THE HOUSEHOLD OF WHICH
SUCH INDIVIDUAL IS A MEMBER SHALL BE REDUCED PRO-RATA UNTIL THE INDIVID-
UAL IS WILLING TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS TITLE  CONSISTENT
WITH  ANY  MEDICAL CONDITION WHICH MAY LIMIT THE INDIVIDUAL'S ABILITY TO
PARTICIPATE IN WORK ACTIVITIES.
  4. IN THE CASE OF AN INDIVIDUAL WHO IS A MEMBER OF A HOUSEHOLD WITHOUT
DEPENDENT CHILDREN WHOM THE DISTRICT HAS DETERMINED IS NOT  EXEMPT  FROM
THE  REQUIREMENTS OF THIS TITLE AND WHO IS APPLYING FOR OR IN RECEIPT OF
SAFETY NET ASSISTANCE, THE PUBLIC ASSISTANCE BENEFITS  OTHERWISE  AVAIL-
ABLE  TO  THE  HOUSEHOLD  OF  WHICH SUCH INDIVIDUAL IS A MEMBER SHALL BE
REDUCED PRO-RATA UNTIL  THE  FAILURE  OR  REFUSAL  TO  COMPLY  WITH  THE
REQUIREMENTS  OF  THIS TITLE CONSISTENT WITH ANY MEDICAL CONDITION WHICH
MAY LIMIT THE INDIVIDUAL'S ABILITY TO  PARTICIPATE  IN  WORK  ACTIVITIES
CEASES.
  5.  A  RECIPIENT OF PUBLIC ASSISTANCE WHOM THE DISTRICT HAS DETERMINED
IS NOT EXEMPT FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF  THIS  TITLE  AND  WHO  QUITS  OR
REDUCES HIS HOURS OF EMPLOYMENT WITHOUT GOOD CAUSE OR DUE TO ANY MEDICAL
CONDITION  WHICH  MAY  LIMIT  THE INDIVIDUAL'S ABILITY TO PARTICIPATE IN
WORK ACTIVITIES SHALL BE CONSIDERED TO HAVE FAILED TO  COMPLY  WITH  THE
REQUIREMENTS  OF  THIS ARTICLE AND SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF
THIS SECTION.
  6. A PERSON DESCRIBED IN PARAGRAPH (B) OF SUBDIVISION SEVEN OF SECTION
ONE HUNDRED FIFTY-NINE OF THIS CHAPTER MAY NOT BE SANCTIONED IF  HIS  OR
HER FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH REQUIREMENTS OF THIS TITLE IS RELATED TO  HIS
OR HER HEALTH STATUS.
  S 4. Section 342 of the social services law is amended by adding a new
subdivision 6 to read as follows:
  6.  THE  PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION SHALL NOT APPLY TO PERSONS WHO ARE
RESIDENTS OF A CITY HAVING A POPULATION OF ONE MILLION OR MORE PEOPLE.
  S 5. This act shall take effect immediately.

Comments

Open Legislation comments facilitate discussion of New York State legislation. All comments are subject to moderation. Comments deemed off-topic, commercial, campaign-related, self-promotional; or that contain profanity or hate speech; or that link to sites outside of the nysenate.gov domain are not permitted, and will not be published. Comment moderation is generally performed Monday through Friday.

By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and verify you are over 13.