S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________
1091--A
2021-2022 Regular Sessions
I N A S S E M B L Y
January 7, 2021
___________
Introduced by M. of A. PAULIN, DINOWITZ, FAHY, L. ROSENTHAL, ZEBROWSKI,
SEAWRIGHT, NOLAN, MAGNARELLI, GALEF, SIMON, ROZIC, GRIFFIN, OTIS,
MONTESANO, SCHMITT, McDONOUGH -- read once and referred to the Commit-
tee on Judiciary -- committee discharged, bill amended, ordered
reprinted as amended and recommitted to said committee
AN ACT to amend the civil rights law and the education law, in relation
to establishing a cause of action for fertility fraud
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The civil rights law is amended by adding a new section
52-d to read as follows:
§ 52-D. PRIVATE RIGHT OF ACTION FOR FERTILITY FRAUD. 1. ANY PATIENT
WHO HAS UNDERGONE AN ASSISTED REPRODUCTION PROCEDURE WITH A HEALTH CARE
PROVIDER, THE SPOUSE OF ANY PATIENT WHO HAS UNDERGONE AN ASSISTED
REPRODUCTION PROCEDURE WITH A HEALTH CARE PROVIDER, OR A CHILD OR PERSON
BORN AS A RESULT OF SUCH ASSISTED REPRODUCTION PROCEDURE SHALL HAVE A
PRIVATE RIGHT OF ACTION FOR DAMAGES AGAINST SUCH HEALTH CARE PROVIDER
UNDER ANY OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
(A) SUCH HEALTH CARE PROVIDER KNOWINGLY OR INTENTIONALLY PERFORMS AN
ASSISTED REPRODUCTION PROCEDURE USING THE HUMAN REPRODUCTIVE MATERIAL OF
THE HEALTH CARE PROVIDER OR ANY OTHER DONOR WITHOUT THE PATIENT'S
INFORMED WRITTEN CONSENT TO TREATMENT USING HUMAN REPRODUCTIVE MATERIAL
FROM THE HEALTH CARE PROVIDER OR FROM ANY DONOR OTHER THAN A DONOR FROM
WHOM THE PATIENT CONSENTED TO IN WRITING; OR
(B) SUCH HEALTH CARE PROVIDER INTENTIONALLY PERFORMS AN ASSISTED
REPRODUCTION PROCEDURE AND SUCH HEALTH CARE PROVIDER KNOWS OR REASONABLY
SHOULD HAVE KNOWN THAT THE HUMAN REPRODUCTIVE MATERIAL WAS USED: (I)
WITHOUT THE DONOR'S CONSENT; OR (II) IN A MANNER OR TO AN EXTENT OTHER
THAN THAT TO WHICH THE DONOR CONSENTED.
2. ANY PATIENT WHO HAS UNDERGONE AN ASSISTED REPRODUCTION PROCEDURE,
THE SPOUSE OF ANY PATIENT WHO HAS UNDERGONE AN ASSISTED REPRODUCTION
EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD06232-10-1
A. 1091--A 2
PROCEDURE, OR A CHILD OR PERSON BORN AS A RESULT OF SUCH ASSISTED
REPRODUCTION PROCEDURE SHALL HAVE A PRIVATE RIGHT OF ACTION FOR DAMAGES
AGAINST A DONOR OR ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE SERVICE PROVIDER UNDER ANY OF
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
(A) SUCH DONOR OR ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE SERVICE PROVIDER KNOWINGLY
PROVIDES FALSE OR MISLEADING INFORMATION ABOUT THE DONOR'S MEDICAL
HISTORY INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO AN ILLNESS AT THE TIME OF DONATION,
ANY PAST ILLNESS OF THE DONOR, OR THE GENETIC OR FAMILY HISTORY OF THE
DONOR FOR THE PAST TWO GENERATIONS WHICH IS KNOWN TO THE DONOR AT THE
TIME OF DONATION; OR
(B) SUCH ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE SERVICE PROVIDER KNOWINGLY USES OR
PROVIDES HUMAN REPRODUCTIVE MATERIAL FOR AN ASSISTED REPRODUCTION PROCE-
DURE IN A MANNER OR TO AN EXTENT OTHER THAN THAT TO WHICH THE PATIENT
CONSENTED.
3. A DONOR OF HUMAN REPRODUCTIVE MATERIAL SHALL HAVE A CAUSE OF ACTION
AGAINST A HEALTH CARE PROVIDER OR ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE SERVICE PROVID-
ER, IF THE DONOR'S HUMAN REPRODUCTIVE MATERIAL WAS USED: (A) WITHOUT THE
DONOR'S CONSENT; OR (B) IN A MANNER OR TO AN EXTENT OTHER THAN THAT TO
WHICH THE DONOR CONSENTED.
4. DAMAGES RECOVERED BY A PLAINTIFF PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION SHALL
INCLUDE COMPENSATORY DAMAGES. IN ADDITION THERETO, THE TRIER OF FACT MAY
AWARD PUNITIVE DAMAGES AND SUCH OTHER NON-MONETARY RELIEF AS MAY BE
APPROPRIATE. IN AWARDING DAMAGES, THE COURT MAY CONSIDER THE EMOTIONAL
IMPACT OF THE DEFENDANT'S CONDUCT.
5. NOTHING IN THIS SECTION SHALL BE DEEMED TO ABROGATE OR OTHERWISE
LIMIT ANY RIGHT OR REMEDY OTHERWISE CONFERRED BY FEDERAL OR STATE LAW
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY RIGHT OR REMEDY RELATED TO CHILD
SUPPORT, NOR SHALL ANY AWARD UNDER THIS SECTION BE USED TO OFFSET CHILD
SUPPORT OBLIGATIONS THAT MAY ARISE IN CONNECTION WITH THIS SECTION.
6. A CAUSE OF ACTION UNDER THIS SECTION SHALL BE COMMENCED NO LATER
THAN SIX YEARS FROM THE DATE A PERSON DISCOVERS, OR REASONABLY SHOULD
HAVE DISCOVERED, THE FERTILITY FRAUD.
7. FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, THE FOLLOWING TERMS SHALL HAVE THE
FOLLOWING MEANINGS:
(A) "DONOR" SHALL MEAN AN INDIVIDUAL WHO DOES NOT INTEND TO BE A
PARENT, WHO PRODUCES HUMAN REPRODUCTIVE MATERIAL AND PROVIDES SUCH HUMAN
REPRODUCTIVE MATERIAL TO ANOTHER PERSON, OTHER THAN THE INDIVIDUAL'S
SPOUSE, FOR USE IN AN ASSISTED REPRODUCTION PROCEDURE;
(B) "HUMAN REPRODUCTIVE MATERIAL" SHALL MEAN:
(I) A HUMAN SPERMATOZOON OR OVUM; OR
(II) A HUMAN ORGANISM AT ANY STAGE OF DEVELOPMENT FROM FERTILIZED OVUM
TO EMBRYO; AND
(C) "PATIENT" SHALL MEAN ANY INDIVIDUAL INJECTED OR IMPLANTED WITH
HUMAN REPRODUCTIVE MATERIAL.
§ 2. Section 6530 of the education law is amended by adding a new
subdivision 51 to read as follows:
51. FOUND LIABLE FOR FERTILITY FRAUD UNDER SECTION FIFTY-TWO-D OF THE
CIVIL RIGHTS LAW.
§ 3. This act shall take effect on the ninetieth day after it shall
have become a law, and shall apply to acts occurring on or after such
date.