BILL NUMBER:  S1855

 TITLE OF BILL :

An act to amend the general business law, in relation to requiring
issuers of credit cards to implement certain fraud prevention measures


 PURPOSE :

The purpose of this bill is to deter credit fraud at the point of the
application process.

 SUMMARY OF SPECIFIC PROVISIONS :

This bill requires that the holder of any credit card issued after the
effective date provides to the issuer proof of identity prior to the
credit card's activation except where the credit account is opened in
person by the authorized card holder. Lastly, the bill prohibits
credit card issuers from mailing pre-approved credit card applications
in envelopes whose exteriors contain any words, phrases, or indicia
describing the enclosed pre-approved credit material.

 JUSTIFICATION :

Credit card fraud continues to be a pervasive problem for both
              

consumers and the financial industry. Credit issuers lose an estimated
$1 billion annually to credit card fraud, with the majority of these
losses resulting from the unauthorized use of lost and stolen credit
cards, and from fraud caused by cards issued by a bank but never
received by this fraudulent activity, the losses are generally passed
onto consumers. According to estimates, the average cardholder, who
possesses eight cards, is forced to pay an extra $55 a year in higher
interest rates and annual fees to cover losses caused by such fraud.
Additionally, credit card holders must deal with the hassles of
cancelling and replacing fraudulently used cards and of clearing up
their often damaged credit records, a process which can take months.

There are, however, certain preventive measures for issuers to take to
combat credit card fraud. Requiring holders of new credit cards to
telephone their issuer and provide proof of identity as a precondition
to activation will further reduce fraud caused by stolen and lost
cards. Unless the fraudulent user is involved in a complex scheme and
has access to a cardholder's personal identification, a card
activation program will significantly decrease the likelihood that a
new credit card will be able to be used by an unauthorized person.
Applications of pre-approved credit mailed to residents in this state
are increasingly being stolen from mailboxes and trash bins. As banks
continue to send out more and more pre-approved applications, some
residents receive several a week, their theft has become more popular.
When a resident notices from the writing on the envelope that the
enclosed materials contain a pre-approved application for credit, that
person often throws the unopened envelope into the garbage along with
other perceived "junk mail". Thieves pick out the pre-approved
applications, change the mailing address to which to send the cards,
and then return the applications to the issuing bank. The new address
will often either be for a post office box or private delivery firm.

With all these pre-approved and generally unsolicited applications
being mailed out, consumers often don't know until it's too late that
a thief has been fraudulently using their credit. To impede such
activity, issuers should be more responsible in how they label the
exterior of envelopes containing pre-approved credit applications. To
a thief, the words "pre-approved credit" or "guaranteed credit"
emblazoned on the envelope is often the same as saying "credit card
inside". Prohibiting the use of such words or phrases will make
stealing pre-approved applications out of the mail or trash
considerably more difficult.

Thus, to combat credit card crimes, several fraud prevention devices
should be made available to consumers. These prevention measures are
relatively easy to implement and inexpensive when compared to the huge
losses suffered by the financial industry each year.  Furthermore,
this bill will provide both consumers and merchants the extra security
and peace of mind necessary in an increasingly technological era.

 PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY :
1996 - A.8375 - passed the assembly
1998 - A.4286 - passed the assembly
1999 - A.5384a/S.3914a - passed both houses, vetoed by Governor
2000 - A.11122 - referred to consumer affairs
2002 - A.2093b - advanced to third reading, Assembly calendar 36
2004 - A.6449  - referred to consumer affairs
2006 - S.4601  - referred to consumer protection
2008 - S.2228  - referred to consumer protection

 FISCAL IMPLICATIONS :

None to the state.

 EFFECTIVE DATE :
This act shall take effect on the one hundred eightieth day after it
shall have become law.