S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________
3306
2009-2010 Regular Sessions
I N S E N A T E
March 16, 2009
___________
Introduced by Sen. OPPENHEIMER -- read twice and ordered printed, and
when printed to be committed to the Committee on Commerce, Economic
Development and Small Business
AN ACT to amend the economic development law, in relation to establish-
ing the economic development program evaluation act
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The economic development law is amended by adding a new
article 15 to read as follows:
ARTICLE 15
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM EVALUATION ACT
SECTION 270. DEFINITION.
271. PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION.
272. EVALUATION.
S 270. DEFINITION. FOR PURPOSES OF THIS ARTICLE, "ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
PROGRAM" SHALL MEAN A PROGRAM THAT PROVIDES SERVICES FOR THE PURPOSE OF
EFFECTING THE ECONOMIC CONDITIONS OF THE STATE, PROVIDES TRAINING OR
EMPLOYMENT SERVICES, SUPPORTS AN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY BY
ENHANCING THE SKILLS OF THE STATE'S WORKFORCE, PREPARES INDIVIDUALS FOR
EMPLOYMENT, IMPROVES OPPORTUNITIES FOR INDIVIDUALS TO BECOME EMPLOYED,
OR PROMOTES THE STATE ECONOMY.
S 271. PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION. 1. ON OR BEFORE SEPTEMBER FIRST, IN THE
YEAR AFTER THIS SECTION BECAME LAW, EACH STATE AGENCY ADMINISTRATIVELY
RESPONSIBLE FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES SHALL PREPARE A SEPARATE
PLAN FOR EACH PROGRAM THAT SUCH AGENCY ADMINISTERS. EACH PLAN SHALL
INCLUDE A DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROGRAM ACTIVITIES, A DESCRIPTION OF A
MECHANISM FOR FUNDING DISTRIBUTION, PROGRAM OBJECTIVES, POPULATION TO BE
SERVED, INSTITUTIONS ELIGIBLE TO RECEIVE FUNDS, AND A DESCRIPTION OF THE
COORDINATION AND LINKAGES BETWEEN THIS PROGRAM AND OTHER PROGRAM ACTIV-
ITIES FUNDED SEPARATELY. SUCH PLAN SHALL ALSO INCLUDE AN EVALUATION
COMPONENT AS PART OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF EACH PROGRAM WHICH SHALL
EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD09274-01-9
S. 3306 2
DESCRIBE HOW THE AGENCY WILL MONITOR THE DELIVERY OF SERVICES UNDER THE
PROGRAM AND WHICH SHALL SET FORTH THE MEASURE OF EFFECTIVENESS OF THE
SERVICES BEING PROVIDED.
2. PROGRAM PLANS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT, THE SPEAKER OF
THE ASSEMBLY AND THE TEMPORARY PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE, FOR REVIEW AND
COMMENT.
3. THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION SHALL NOT EXEMPT ANY AGENCY FROM
REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO THE PREPARATION AND SUBMISSION OF PROGRAM PLANS
PURSUANT TO ANY OTHER PROVISION OF LAW.
S 272. EVALUATION. 1. THE EVALUATION COMPONENT OF EACH PROGRAM PLAN
SHALL, AT A MINIMUM, INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING:
(A) A STATEMENT ON LEGISLATIVE HISTORY AND INTENT;
(B) A STATEMENT OF PROGRAM OBJECTIVES WHICH IDENTIFIES OUTCOMES
ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE PROGRAM, ANTICIPATED PERFORMANCE LEVELS, AND INDICA-
TORS OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE PROGRAM;
(C) DEFINED QUANTITATIVE MEASURES WHICH WILL BE INCLUDED AS PART OF
THE EVALUATION REPORT INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, A DESCRIPTION OF
THE TARGETED POPULATION, CRITERIA FOR PARTICIPANT SELECTION, DEMOGRAPH-
ICS ON PARTICIPANTS, MEASURES OF PROGRAM ACTIVITY, INVENTORY OF SERVICES
PROVIDED, AND BUDGET INFORMATION ON PROGRAMS AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDI-
TURES INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COSTS PER PARTICIPANT. FOR THOSE
PROGRAMS WHERE AN OBJECTIVE IS JOB PLACEMENT, DATA SHALL INCLUDE INFOR-
MATION ON THE OCCUPATIONS WHICH PARTICIPANTS ENTER, THE RATE OF JOB
RETENTION, PRE-PROGRAM WAGE EARNINGS AND POST-PROGRAM WAGE EARNINGS AS
WELL AS OTHER APPROPRIATE MEASURES WHICH INDICATE THE EXTENT TO WHICH
PROGRAM ACTIVITIES MEET PROGRAM OBJECTIVES. OTHER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
THAT APPROPRIATELY DESCRIBE THE EFFECT OF THE PROGRAM AND DATA WHICH
REFLECTS FOLLOW-UP ACTIVITY APPROPRIATE TO THE SERVICES PROVIDED SHALL
ALSO BE INCLUDED AS PART OF THE EVALUATION REPORT;
(D) A STATEMENT OF METHODOLOGY WHICH WILL RESULT IN A COMPARISON OF
PROGRAM OUTCOMES AGAINST PROGRAM OBJECTIVES; AND
(E) ANY ADDITIONAL EVALUATION INFORMATION AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY LAW.
2. (A) THE EVALUATION REPORT FOR EACH PROGRAM SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO
THE COMMISSIONER FOR REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION.
(B) THE REPORT SHALL INCLUDE, AT A MINIMUM, ALL PROGRAM DATA AND AN
ANALYSIS WHICH COMPARES PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES AGAINST PROGRAM OBJECTIVES
AS SPECIFIED IN THE EVALUATION COMPONENT OF THE PROGRAM PLAN DEFINED
HEREIN AND SHALL INCLUDE AN EVALUATION OF ACTIVITY FOR THE COMPLETED
PROGRAM YEAR IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING THE ISSUANCE OF THE REPORT AND AN
INTERIM EVALUATION OF CURRENT PROGRAM YEAR ACTIVITY IF APPLICABLE.
3. BASED ON THE REVIEW CONDUCTED PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (A) OF SUBDIVI-
SION TWO OF THIS SECTION, THE DEPARTMENT SHALL PREPARE A UNIFIED SUMMARY
OF EVALUATION REPORTS SUBMITTED BY EACH AGENCY PURSUANT TO THIS ARTICLE
FOR SUBMISSION TO THE SPEAKER OF THE ASSEMBLY AND THE TEMPORARY PRESI-
DENT OF THE SENATE NO LATER THAN JANUARY THIRTY-FIRST, TWO THOUSAND TEN
AND EACH YEAR THEREAFTER PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT THE DEPARTMENT SHALL
MAKE AVAILABLE EACH INDIVIDUAL PROGRAM EVALUATION REPORT SUBMITTED
PURSUANT TO THIS ARTICLE UPON REQUEST OF THE LEGISLATURE. THE DEPARTMENT
SHALL INCLUDE IN SUCH SUMMARY RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE GOVERNOR AND THE
LEGISLATURE RELATING TO IMPROVED PROGRAM COORDINATION AND SERVICE DELIV-
ERY, PROGRAM IMPROVEMENTS OR ENHANCEMENTS AND NECESSARY STATUTORY CHANG-
ES.
4. THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION SHALL NOT EXEMPT ANY AGENCY FROM
REQUIREMENTS PURSUANT TO ANY OTHER PROVISION OF LAW.
S 2. This act shall take effect immediately.