Assembly Actions -
Lowercase Senate Actions - UPPERCASE |
|
---|---|
Jan 06, 2010 |
referred to judiciary |
Jun 17, 2009 |
reported referred to ways and means |
Jun 16, 2009 |
reported referred to codes |
Jun 09, 2009 |
referred to judiciary |
Assembly Bill A8793
2009-2010 Legislative Session
Establishes the public defense act of 2009; repealer
download bill text pdfSponsored By
LENTOL
Archive: Last Bill Status - In Assembly Committee
- Introduced
-
- In Committee Assembly
- In Committee Senate
-
- On Floor Calendar Assembly
- On Floor Calendar Senate
-
- Passed Assembly
- Passed Senate
- Delivered to Governor
- Signed By Governor
Actions
co-Sponsors
Richard Gottfried
Amy Paulin
Kevin Cahill
Barbara Clark
Ronald Canestrari
Steven Englebright
Rhoda Jacobs
Jeffrey Dinowitz
Adam Clayton Powell IV
Crystal Peoples-Stokes
Brian Kavanagh
Linda Rosenthal
Michael Benedetto
Helene Weinstein
Susan John
Michelle Schimel
Rory Lancman
Daniel O'Donnell
George Latimer
Karim Camara
Nelson Castro
Vanessa Gibson
Kenneth Zebrowski
Michael DenDekker
multi-Sponsors
Peter Abbate
Thomas Alfano
Jeffrion Aubry
James Bacalles
Michael Benjamin
Jonathan Bing
William Boyland
James F. Brennan
Richard Brodsky
Alec Brook-Krasny
Vivian Cook
Steven Cymbrowitz
Adriano Espaillat
Herman D. Farrell
Ginny Fields
Dennis H. Gabryszak
David Gantt
Joseph Giglio
Deborah Glick
Timothy P. Gordon
Carl Heastie
Dov Hikind
Earlene Hooper
Sam Hoyt
Ellen C. Jaffee
Hakeem Jeffries
Micah Kellner
Charles Lavine
Barbara Lifton
Vito Lopez
Donna Lupardo
William Magee
William Magnarelli
Alan Maisel
Margaret Markey
John McEneny
Joan Millman
Joseph Morelle
Felix Ortiz
William Parment
N. Nick Perry
Audrey Pheffer
J. Gary Pretlow
Philip Ramos
Robert Reilly
Naomi Rivera
Peter Rivera
Annette Robinson
William Scarborough
Mark J.F. Schroeder
Dierdre Scozzafava
Robert Sweeney
Fred Thiele
Matthew Titone
Michele Titus
Darryl Towns
David Townsend
Harvey Weisenberg
Keith L.T. Wright
2009-A8793 (ACTIVE) - Details
- See Senate Version of this Bill:
- S6002
- Current Committee:
- Assembly Judiciary
- Law Section:
- Judiciary Law
- Laws Affected:
- Add Art 15-A §§499-a - 499-m, Judy L; amd §§722, rpld Arts 18-A & 18-B, County L; amd §98-b, St Fin L
2009-A8793 (ACTIVE) - Summary
Establishes the public defense act of 2009 to improve the quality of public defense services through state oversight, funding and control of public defense services, while planning and implementing the state's assumption of these responsibilities in a manner that is responsive to regional and community needs.
2009-A8793 (ACTIVE) - Sponsor Memo
BILL NUMBER:A8793 REVISED 07/30/09 TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the judiciary law, the county law, and the state finance law, in relation to establishing the public defense act of 2009; and to repeal articles 18-A and 18-B of the county law relating thereto PURPOSE OR GENERAL IDEA OF BILL: The Purpose of the Public Defense Act of 2009 is to improve the quality of public defense services in New York State. The bill would create a public benefit corporation charged with implementing state oversight, funding and control of public defense services. SUMMARY OF SPECIFIC PROVISIONS: Section 1 creates a new article 15-A of the Judiciary Law, with thirteen sections as follows: Section 499-a gives the legislation the short title Public Defense Act of 2009. Section 499-b sets forth the general purposes of the Public Defense Act. Section 499-c defines the key terms associated with the legislation. Section 499-d establishes the Public Defense Commission as a public
benefit corporation ensuring that the Commission is independent of political interference. Section 499-e sets forth the appointments to the Commission. The Commission shall consist of thirteen members who reflect the geographic, racial, ethnic and gender makeup of the State and the cultural diversity of the State's public defense clients. Nominees shall be selected from various sources and presented to the Governor for his or her appointment. Appointments shall be completed within sixty days of enactment. Section 499-f sets forth the terms for the Commission members, the designation of a chairperson and the provisions for filling vacancies. Section 499-g establishes the general powers, duties and responsibilities of the Commission which shall include, upon enactment, promulgating a strategic plan for the administration and funding of public defense services throughout the State; and, commencing April 1, 2012, undertaking the oversight and administration of all public defense services in New York. The Commission shall also evaluate the existing public defense system and calculate the cost of that system subjected to economies of scale, reduction of waste, elimination of duplication and compliance with best practices. The Commission shall establish qualifications, duties and compensation for staff and appoint the state defender. The Commission shall also set standards for public defense services to ensure quality representation and prepare reports on the needs of the system and potential statutory changes. Section 499-h establishes a state defender appointed by the Commission who shall serve as the chief executive officer of the Commission. Section 499-i provides that, at the request of the Commission, all other state and local offices shall render such information, assistance, and cooperation as shall be within their legal authority in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Section 499-j provides that the Commission shall be independent yet shall work with the State Division of the Budget to ensure fiscal discipline and accountability. Section 499-k establishes a Financing Transition Advisory Council to the Commission, members of which shall be appointed to advise the Commission and who shall be knowledgeable in county and city government. The Advisory Council shall consist of fifteen members and shall be charged, among other things, with devising and recommending to the Commission a fair and equitable formula for fixing and permanently capping annual offset contributions by localities to the total cost of providing public defense services. If adopted by the Commission, this per-county capping formula would take effect no earlier than 2022 and would replace the per-county capping formula defined in section 499-m, which would take effect April 1, 2012. The Act provides that, under either per-county capping formula, the total aggregate offset contributions of all the counties to the cost of public defense shall not exceed $339 million, which is the projected total amount that would be spent in 2012, by all 62 counties combined, for indigent defense services under the current system. Section 499-l provides that, until such time as the Commission has assumed complete responsibility for the oversight and administration of public defense services in the State in accordance with subdivision one of section 499-g of the Act, the Commission shall have no power or authority to impose, enforce or otherwise require compliance by any locality or public defense provider with any standards, including but not limited to standards relating to caseload, training, ethics or client eligibility. Section 499-m provides that, effective April 1, 2012, counties in the State shall be permanently relieved of the obligation to provide and administer public defense services, which obligation shall become solely a state charge subject to a "fixed annual local offset contribution" to be paid by each county to the Indigent Legal Services Fund to the credit of the Commission. This "fixed annual offset contribution" is subject to both a "per county" cap and an "aggregate" (62-county total) cap. The aggregate cap is fixed at $339 million, which is the projected total amount that would be spent in 2012, by all 62 counties combined, for indigent defense services under the current system. The formula established by section 499-m for the "per county" cap is fixed as a percentage of this $339 million total. Under the formula, each county would be obligated to pay, on an annual basis, a percentage of the $339 million total that represents the average of the percentage of total net expenditures for indigent defense made by them between 2002 and 2008 as calculated by the State Comptroller. This "averaging" formula for determining the "per county" cap would remain in effect until at least 2022, when the Commission, at the recommendation of the Financing Transition Advisory Council created by section 499-k of the Act, could adopt a revised, and presumably fairer, formula for determining each county's percentage contribution to the $339 million total. Section 2 amends County Law section 722 to add a new subdivision six, entitled "Discontinuance of Plan at County Request." This provision, which would become effective one year after the effective date of the Act and would remain in effect only until April 1, 2012, would permit any county or counties (other than those comprising New York City), during that approximately two-year period, to enter into a contract with the Commission whereby the Commission would be solely responsible for providing indigent defense and related services required under County Law section 722 in that county. If the Commission agrees to enter into the contract, the county would then be required to discontinue its section 722 "plan" for providing such services. Any county entering into such a "discontinuance agreement" with the Commission would be required -- during the period of the contract and pursuant to the agreed-to terms thereof -- to pay an annual "discontinuance offset contribution" to the Indigent Legal Services Fund. Section 3 would repeal article 18-A and 18-B of the County Law, effective April 1, 2012. Section 4 would amend the State Finance Law to provide that as of January 1, 2012, moneys from the Indigent Legal Services Fund not designated for the Office of Court Administration for the payment of Law Guardians (now Attorneys for the Child) shall be paid to the credit of the Commission. Section 5 provides that the Act shall take effective immediately, except for specific provisions as described above. JUSTIFICATION: Gideon v. Wainright{1} was decided in 1963 by the United States Supreme Court, wherein Justice Black stated that "lawyers in criminal courts are necessities, not luxuries." Today, in New York State, thousands of people are denied their constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel because the delivery system for public defense services is underfunded and overburdened. Currently, public defense services are delivered by county government, as the State has passed this constitutional obligation down to the localities, in what can only be defined as an unfunded mandate. Over the years, with counties providing services, it has become obvious that there are no statewide standards of what is an "adequate" public defense system. Multiple studies and commissions have examined New York's public defense system and have declared it broken. The current system is underfunded, faced with excessive caseloads and inadequate support services. Many public defenders are inadequately trained, have minimal client contact and conduct few or no investigations. Under the current public defense system, there is no clear standard of eligibility and there are widespread denials of the right to counsel. This measure is a solution to this grave problem. This bill would create a public benefit corporation, known as the Public Defense Commission, which as of April 1, 2012 would oversee and administer all public defense services in New York State. During the initial three-year period the Commission would study the current system, calculate the costs of a public defense system and examine ways to reduce waste, eliminate duplication and produce a system with meaningful economies of scale. The goal of the Commission is to provide effective assistance of counsel while ensuring the system is lifting this longstanding financial burden off the counties. The Commission would have a Financing Transition Advisory Council that would consist of members familiar with county and local government to ensure a seamless transition from a primarily county-funded public defense system. When enacted, this bill will empower the Commission to establish a public defense delivery system that meets the constitutional mandate, is independent of political interference and is fiscally responsible. PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: 2007 Similar Bill A.9087-A/S.4311-A (Lentol/Volker). FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: The Commission would be funded for the initial three-year period by an appropriation from the Indigent Legal Services Fund (ILSF) in the amount of three million dollars each year for those three years. This expenditure would allow the Commission to establish an office, staff, adapt the public case management system and contract and consult with evaluators and experts and begin to perform its general duties. In 2012, when the Commission assumes control of all public defense services, the localities will be required to provide a fixed offset contribution to be paid annually by the locality to the ILSF to the credit of the Commission. The aggregate amount to be paid by counties shall be $339,000,000 (the projected local spending based upon 2008 actual spending and historical trends). Each locality shall pay, on an annual basis, a percentage of that amount based on the average of the percentages of total net local expenditures made by the county between 2002 and 2008, as calculated by the Office of the State Comptroller. For most counties, the amount required of them annually, after the Commission has assumed control of the system, will immediately be less than what the counties would be expected to pay in the future, based on current rate of growth.{2} The Commission shall also be funded by the already existing ILSF in the projected amount of approximately $100 million. Any expenditure beyond this approximately $439 million combined level of spending will be at the state's expense. EFFECTIVE DATE: Immediately, except for certain provisions as noted above. FOOTNOTES: {1} 372 U.S. 335, 344 (1963). {2} See attached Chart. County Savings With Capping Based on Projected 4.932% Annual Increase in NLE - Using 2008 NLE PROJECTED COUNTY SPENDING WITHOUT CAP Permanent County Cap based on County 2012 2013 2014 339,000,000 Albany $4,893,399 $5,134,741 $5,387,987 $4,510,418 Allegany $ 715,140 $ 750,411 $ 787,421 $ 623,739 Broome $4,187,427 $4,393,951 $4,610,660 $3,817,585 Cattaraugus $1,502,274 $1,576,366 $1,654,112 $1,310,939 Cayuga $ 728,747 $ 764,741 $ 802,459 $ 659,124 Chautauqua $1,508,408 $1,582,803 $1,660,867 $1,614,959 Chemung $1,779,112 $1,866,858 $1,958,932 $1,603,713 Chenango $ 683,271 $ 716,970 $ 752,331 $ 494,342 Clinton $1,488,748 $1,562,174 $1,639,220 $1,421,023 Columbia $ 822,735 $ 863,312 $ 905,890 $ 889,322 Cortland $1,021,232 $1,071,599 $1,124,450 $ 825,446 Delaware $ 498,684 $ 523,279 $ 549,087 $ 505,989 Dutchess $5,574,686 $5,849,630 $6,138,133 $4,917,376 Erie $9,495,480 $9,963,797 $10,455,211 $9,670,692 Essex $ 655,278 $ 687,597 $ 721,509 $ 522,103 Franklin $ 769,586 $ 807,542 $ 847,370 $ 571,783 Fulton $ 705,608 $ 740,409 $ 776,926 $ 505,484 Genesee $1,033,748 $1,084,733 $1,138,232 $ 973,695 Greene $ 673,322 $ 706,530 $ 741,376 $ 653,497 Hamilton $ 138,962 $ 145,816 $ 153,007 $ 90,804 Herkimer $ 317,510 $ 333,170 $ 349,601 $ 366,593 Jefferson $1,288,350 $1,351,892 $1,418,567 $1,293,224 Lewis $ 370,923 $ 389,217 $ 408,413 $ 316,392 Livingston $ 695,266 $ 729,556 $ 765,538 $ 643,937 Madison $ 762,479 $ 800,084 $ 839,545 $ 670,316 Monroe $10,890,612 $11,427,737 $11,991,353 $10,494,438 Montgomery $ 629,316 $ 660,354 $ 692,922 $ 479,522 Nassau $10,196,763 $10,699,668 $11,227,375 $9,744,726 Niagara $2,032,790 $2,133,048 $2,238,250 $1,992,961 Oneida $3,184,032 $3,341,069 $3,505,850 $3,365,655 Onondaga $6,157,787 $6,461,489 $6,780,169 $6,356,335 Ontario $1,842,059 $1,932,910 $2,028,241 $1,572,556 Orange $4,504,720 $4,726,892 $4,960,023 $4,280,667 Orleans $ 604,541 $ 634,357 $ 665,644 $ 506,389 Oswego $1,291,221 $1,354,904 $1,421,728 $1,152,659 Otsego $ 940,955 $ 987,363 $1,036,060 $ 978,960 Putnam $ 872,055 $ 915,064 $ 960,195 $ 880,003 Rensselaer $1,824,604 $1,914,593 $2,009,021 $1,680,092 Rockland $4,245,806 $4,455,209 $4,674,940 $4,313,335 St.Lawrence $1,734,553 $1,820,102 $1,909,869 $1,640,605 Saratoga $1,355,166 $1,422,003 $1,492,136 $1,291,155 Schenectady $3,161,556 $3,317,484 $3,481,103 $2,908,848 Schoharie $ 441,958 $ 463,755 $ 486,627 $ 379,437 Schuyler $ 375,825 $ 394,360 $ 413,810 $ 289,143 Seneca $ 385,251 $ 404,251 $ 424,189 $ 426,424 Steuben $1,387,389 $1,455,815 $1,527,616 $1,282,796 Suffolk $14,075,151 $14,769,337 $15,497,761 $12,916,155 Sullivan $1,645,366 $1,726,516 $1,811,667 $1,780,391 Tioga $ 422,510 $ 443,348 $ 465,214 $ 408,569 Tompkins $1,832,108 $1,992,468 $2,017,284 $1,672,536 Ulster $2,718,215 $2,852,278 $2,992,952 $2,485,948 Warren $1,019,101 $1,069,363 $1,122,104 $ 829,313 Washington $ 559,952 $ 587,569 $ 616,547 $ 503,485 Wayne $1,375,105 $1,442,926 $1,514,091 $1,570,946 Westchester $18,599,191 $19,516,503 $20,479,057 $18,433,157 Wyoming $ 342,820 $ 359,728 $ 377,470 $ 336,264 Yates $ 324,976 $ 341,003 $ 357,822 $ 296,989 New York City $196,093,769 $205,765,114 $215,913,449 $202,277,046 Total $339,377,648 $356,115,763 $373,679,382 $339,000,000 Non NYC Total $143,283,879 $150,350,640 $157,765,933 $136,722,954 Projected County Expenditures were extrapolated from 2008 spending figures. NYSDA projected increases in public defense spending based on an average rate of annual increase for all counties in the years for which data are available. By examining changes in county funding of public defense between the years 2002-2003, 2005-2006, 2006-2007, and 2007-2008, NYSDA found that counties increased funding to public defense by 4.932% a year. Changes across the years 2003-2004 and 2004-2005 were excluded because assigned counsel fees increased in 2004 by state mandate. This resulted in considerable increases in spending in 2004 followed by reductions in 2005 as counties adapted their programs to compensate for the increased fees. These changes were dramatic, but atypical, and so were excluded from the analysis. Permanent County Cap amount of $339,000,000 represents a projection of an annual 4.932% increase in net local expenditures through the year 2012, beginning in the year 2009. The amount was then rounded to $339,000,000 for the calculation of the permanent county cap. Forecasting patterns over time in statistical data are best accomplished using AutoRegressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) time-series analysis. This sophisticated econometric method is commonly used to find underlying patterns in sequences of data and predict future outcomes. This method requires a minimum of thirty data points in a time series to be usable, however, and reliable public defense spending data for New York counties are only available for the years 2002-2008.
2009-A8793 (ACTIVE) - Bill Text download pdf
S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K ________________________________________________________________________ 8793 2009-2010 Regular Sessions I N A S S E M B L Y June 9, 2009 ___________ Introduced by M. of A. LENTOL, GOTTFRIED, PAULIN, CAHILL, CLARK, CANES- TRARI, ENGLEBRIGHT, JACOBS, DINOWITZ, POWELL, PEOPLES, KAVANAGH, ROSENTHAL, BENEDETTO, WEINSTEIN, JOHN, SCHIMEL, LANCMAN, O'DONNELL, LATIMER -- Multi-Sponsored by -- M. of A. ABBATE, ALFANO, AUBRY, BACALLES, BENJAMIN, BING, BOYLAND, BRADLEY, BRENNAN, BRODSKY, BROOK-KRASNY, CYMBROWITZ, DenDEKKER, ESPAILLAT, FARRELL, FIELDS, GANTT, GIGLIO, GLICK, GORDON, HEASTIE, HIKIND, HOOPER, HOYT, JAFFEE, JEFFRIES, KELLNER, LAVINE, LIFTON, V. LOPEZ, LUPARDO, MAGEE, MAGNAREL- LI, MAISEL, MARKEY, McENENY, MILLMAN, MORELLE, ORTIZ, PARMENT, PERRY, PHEFFER, PRETLOW, REILLY, N. RIVERA, P. RIVERA, ROBINSON, SCARBOROUGH, SCHROEDER, SCOZZAFAVA, SWEENEY, THIELE, TITONE, TITUS, TOWNS, TOWN- SEND, WEISENBERG, WRIGHT -- read once and referred to the Committee on Judiciary AN ACT to amend the judiciary law, the county law, and the state finance law, in relation to establishing the public defense act of 2009; and to repeal articles 18-A and 18-B of the county law relating thereto THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM- BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The judiciary law is amended by adding a new article 15-A to read as follows: ARTICLE 15-A PUBLIC DEFENSE ACT OF 2009 SECTION 499-A. SHORT TITLE. 499-B. PURPOSES. 499-C. DEFINITIONS. 499-D. PUBLIC DEFENSE COMMISSION ESTABLISHED. 499-E. PUBLIC DEFENSE COMMISSION; APPOINTMENTS AND QUALIFICA- TIONS. 499-F. PUBLIC DEFENSE COMMISSION; TERMS OF OFFICE; DESIGNATION OF CHAIRPERSON; RE-APPOINTMENT; VACANCIES AND COMPEN- SATION. EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [ ] is old law to be omitted. LBD11952-03-9
A. 8793 2 499-G. PUBLIC DEFENSE COMMISSION; GENERAL POWERS, DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES. 499-H. STATE DEFENDER. 499-I. ASSISTANCE BY STATE OFFICES, DEPARTMENTS, BOARDS, DIVI- SIONS AND COMMISSIONS AND FROM LOCALITIES AND PUBLIC DEFENSE PROVIDERS. 499-J. INDEPENDENCE; FISCAL DISCIPLINE. 499-K. FINANCING TRANSITION ADVISORY COUNCIL TO THE COMMISSION. 499-L. ENFORCEMENT OF STANDARDS; PROHIBITION. 499-M. ELIMINATION OF LOCAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR PUBLIC DEFENSE SERVICES; FIXED ANNUAL LOCAL OFFSET CONTRIBUTION. S 499-A. SHORT TITLE. THIS ARTICLE SHALL BE KNOWN AS AND MAY BE CITED AS THE "PUBLIC DEFENSE ACT OF 2009". S 499-B. PURPOSES. THE PURPOSES OF THIS ARTICLE ARE TO: 1. IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF PUBLIC DEFENSE SERVICES STATEWIDE BY IMPLEMENTING STATE OVER- SIGHT, FUNDING AND CONTROL OF PUBLIC DEFENSE SERVICES, WHILE PROVIDING FOR THE PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE STATE'S ASSUMPTION OF THESE RESPONSIBILITIES IN A MANNER THAT IS RESPONSIVE TO REGIONAL AND COMMUNI- TY NEEDS; 2. ENSURE THAT PUBLIC DEFENSE REPRESENTATION IS PROVIDED WITHIN A TRULY INDEPENDENT ATMOSPHERE FREE FROM POLITICAL INFLUENCE AND CONFLICTS OF INTEREST; 3. LIMIT THE FISCAL BURDEN ON LOCALITIES BY IMPLEMENTING FULL STATE ADMINISTRATION AND FUNDING OF PUBLIC DEFENSE SERVICES SUBJECT TO AN EQUITABLE FIXED ANNUAL OFFSET CONTRIBUTION; 4. GUARANTEE THAT STATE AND LOCAL FUNDS FOR PUBLIC DEFENSE SERVICES ARE MANAGED IN AN EFFICIENT AND COST EFFECTIVE MANNER WITHOUT SACRIFIC- ING QUALITY OF REPRESENTATION; 5. ESTABLISH A PUBLIC DEFENSE COMMISSION AS A PUBLIC BENEFIT CORPO- RATION RESPONSIBLE FOR OVERSEEING PUBLIC DEFENSE SERVICES AND PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTING STATE ADMINISTRATION OF PUBLIC DEFENSE SERVICES THROUGHOUT THE STATE; ENSURING THAT SUCH SERVICES ARE DELIVERED BY QUAL- IFIED AND COMPETENT ATTORNEYS IN A MANNER THAT IS FAIR, EFFECTIVE AND UNIFORM; AND DEVELOPING POLICIES, PROCEDURES AND STANDARDS FOR THE DELIVERY OF SUCH SERVICES; AND 6. ENHANCE OVERSIGHT OF THE DELIVERY OF PUBLIC DEFENSE SERVICES BY GENERATING RELIABLE STATISTICAL INFORMATION AND DATA NEEDED TO EVALUATE THE SERVICES PROVIDED AND FUNDS EXPENDED. S 499-C. DEFINITIONS. FOR PURPOSES OF THIS ARTICLE: 1. "CLIENT" MEANS ANY PERSON WHO RECEIVES OR HAS RECEIVED PUBLIC DEFENSE SERVICES. 2. "CLIENT COMMUNITY" MEANS CLIENTS, THEIR FAMILIES, LOCAL NEIGHBOR- HOODS IN WHICH A SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF CLIENTS LIVE AND ORGANIZATIONS DEDICATED TO PROVIDING SUPPORT OR ADVOCACY TO CLIENTS, THEIR FAMILIES AND LOCAL NEIGHBORHOODS. 3. "COMMISSION" MEANS THE THIRTEEN MEMBERS COMPRISING THE PUBLIC DEFENSE COMMISSION. 4. "ELIGIBLE PERSON" MEANS ANY PERSON ELIGIBLE TO RECEIVE PUBLIC DEFENSE SERVICES. 5. "LOCALITY" MEANS ANY REGION IN NEW YORK, INCLUDING A COUNTY, A PART OF A COUNTY OR A GROUP OF COUNTIES OR PARTS OF COUNTIES EXCEPT THAT WITHIN A COUNTY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK SUCH TERM SHALL MEAN THE CITY OF NEW YORK. 6. "PUBLIC DEFENSE SERVICES" MEANS PUBLICLY-FINANCED LEGAL REPRESEN- TATION, INCLUDING THE SERVICES OF ATTORNEYS AND/OR ALL INVESTIGATIVE AND NECESSARY ANCILLARY SERVICES PROVIDED TO PERSONS UNABLE TO AFFORD THEM AND SUSPECTED OF, ACCUSED OF, CHARGED WITH, OR CONVICTED OF, COMMITTING A. 8793 3 A FELONY, MISDEMEANOR, OR THE BREACH OF ANY LAW OF THIS STATE OR OF ANY LAW, LOCAL LAW OR ORDINANCE OF A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE FOR WHICH A SENTENCE TO A TERM OF IMPRISONMENT IS AUTHORIZED UPON CONVICTION THEREOF, INCLUDING REPRESENTATION AT THE PRETRIAL, TRIAL, APPELLATE AND POST-CONVICTION STAGES IN CRIMINAL CASES, OR ENTITLED TO REPRESENTATION UNDER SECTION TWO HUNDRED SIXTY-TWO OF THE FAMILY COURT ACT OR OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO PUBLIC REPRESENTATION IN FAMILY COURT, SUPREME COURT, SURROGATE'S COURT, PAROLE PROCEEDINGS AND RELATED APPEALS UNDER THE EXECUTIVE LAW, IN CLASSIFICATION PROCEEDINGS UNDER ARTICLE SIX-C OF THE CORRECTION LAW AND RELATED APPEALS AND IN ALL OTHER CASES WHERE COUNSEL IS OR MAY BE PROVIDED FOR BY LAW. 7. "PUBLIC DEFENSE SERVICE PROVIDER" OR "SERVICE PROVIDER" MEANS AN ENTITY OR INDIVIDUAL AUTHORIZED BY LAW TO PROVIDE PUBLIC DEFENSE SERVICES. S 499-D. PUBLIC DEFENSE COMMISSION ESTABLISHED. 1. THERE IS HEREBY ESTABLISHED THE NEW YORK STATE PUBLIC DEFENSE COMMISSION, A BODY CORPO- RATE CONSTITUTING A PUBLIC BENEFIT CORPORATION. 2. THE COMMISSION SHALL RECEIVE AN APPROPRIATION FROM THE INDIGENT LEGAL SERVICES FUND, ESTABLISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION NINETY-EIGHT-B OF THE STATE FINANCE LAW, IN THE AMOUNT OF THREE MILLION DOLLARS FOR FISCAL YEAR TWO THOUSAND NINE-TWO THOUSAND TEN TO ESTABLISH AND STAFF AN OFFICE, ADAPT THE PUBLIC DEFENSE CASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, CONTRACT AND CONSULT WITH COMPETENT EVALUATORS, EXPERTS, AND THE NEW YORK STATE DEFENDERS ASSOCIATION PUBLIC DEFENSE BACKUP CENTER, BEGIN THE ESTABLISH- MENT OF APPROPRIATE PRIVATE-PUBLIC PARTNERSHIPS AND DEVELOP A WORK PLAN FOR AND OTHERWISE CARRY OUT ITS GENERAL POWERS, DUTIES AND RESPONSIBIL- ITIES AS DEFINED IN THIS ARTICLE. 3. THE COMMISSION SHALL OPERATE INDEPENDENTLY FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF THE PUBLIC DEFENSE SYSTEM AND SHALL BE FREE FROM POLITICAL INTERFERENCE. 4. THE BUDGET FOR THE COMMISSION SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO, THE SALARIES OF ALL COMMISSION PERSONNEL, AN ALLOCATION FOR OFFICE EXPENSES, FURNITURE, COMPUTERS, LIBRARY, AND AN ALLOCATION FOR SUCH ADDITIONAL ITEMS AS MAY BE NECESSARY FOR THE COMMISSION TO PERFORM ITS FUNCTIONS PURSUANT TO THIS ARTICLE. 5. THE COMMISSION WILL BE PERFORMING AN ESSENTIAL GOVERNMENTAL FUNC- TION IN THE EXERCISE OF THE POWERS CONFERRED UPON IT BY THIS ARTICLE AND THE COMMISSION SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED TO PAY TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS UPON ANY OF THE PROPERTY ACQUIRED BY IT OR UNDER ITS JURISDICTION AND CONTROL. 6. ALL CONTRIBUTIONS MADE TO THE COMMISSION WHETHER BY GIFT, DEVISE, GRANT, DONATION OR BEQUEST SHALL QUALIFY AS DEDUCTIONS IN COMPUTING THE NET TAXABLE INCOME OF THE DONOR FOR THE PURPOSE OF INCOME TAX IMPOSED BY THE STATE OR ANY POLITICAL SUBDIVISION THEREOF. 7. THE COMMISSION SHALL PROTECT THE CONFIDENCES AND SECRETS OF CLIENTS. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF LAW TO THE CONTRARY, NO RECORD OR REPORT SHALL BE DEEMED DEFICIENT BECAUSE OF THE OMISSION OF INFORMATION, THE PROVISION OF WHICH WOULD RESULT IN THE DISCLOSURE OF SUCH CONFIDENCES OR SECRETS, OR WOULD OTHERWISE COMPROMISE THE INTEREST OF ANY CLIENT. 8. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF LAW TO THE CONTRARY, THE COMMISSION SHALL BE EXEMPT FROM THE APPLICATION OF ANY PROVISION OF ARTICLES SIX AND SEVEN OF THE PUBLIC OFFICERS LAW. S 499-E. PUBLIC DEFENSE COMMISSION; APPOINTMENTS AND QUALIFICATIONS. 1. THE COMMISSION SHALL BE COMPOSED OF THIRTEEN MEMBERS WHO SHALL BE SELECTED WITH REGARD FOR THE GEOGRAPHIC, RACIAL, ETHNIC AND GENDER MAKE- UP OF THE STATE AND THE CULTURAL DIVERSITY OF THE STATE'S PUBLIC DEFENSE A. 8793 4 CLIENTS. A PERSON APPOINTED TO THE COMMISSION MUST HAVE A DEMONSTRABLE COMMITMENT TO QUALITY REPRESENTATION OF LOWER INCOME PEOPLE, TO IMPROV- ING THE PUBLIC DEFENSE SYSTEM AND TO THE PRINCIPLE OF INDEPENDENCE OF THE DEFENSE FUNCTION. WHILE SERVING ON THE COMMISSION, NO MEMBER OF THE COMMISSION SHALL BE A JUDGE, PROSECUTOR, PUBLIC DEFENSE PROVIDER, LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER, COUNTY ATTORNEY, ATTORNEY GENERAL, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, OR EMPLOYEE THEREOF, OR A FULL TIME EMPLOYEE OF THE STATE OR ANY POLITICAL SUBDIVISION, OR OF ANY BOARD, COMMISSION, AGENCY OR AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OR ANY POLITICAL SUBDIVISION THEREOF. 2. THE MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION SHALL BE APPOINTED BY THE GOVERNOR AS FOLLOWS: A. THREE ATTORNEYS WITH A DEMONSTRABLE COMMITMENT TO IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF PUBLIC DEFENSE REPRESENTATION FROM NOMINEES SUBMITTED BY THE CHIEF JUDGE OF THE NEW YORK STATE COURT OF APPEALS AS FOLLOWS: (I) ONE FROM NOT LESS THAN THREE NOMINEES WITH SUBSTANTIAL EXPERIENCE IN THE HANDLING OF CRIMINAL TRIALS OR APPEALS; (II) ONE FROM NOT LESS THAN THREE NOMINEES WITH SUBSTANTIAL EXPERIENCE IN THE HANDLING OF FAMILY-RELATED TRIALS OR APPEALS; AND (III) ONE FROM NOT LESS THAN THREE NOMINEES DRAWN FROM A LIST OF INDI- VIDUALS RECOMMENDED TO THE CHIEF JUDGE BY THE DEANS OF THE STATE'S LAW SCHOOLS; B. ONE ATTORNEY WITH A DEMONSTRABLE COMMITMENT TO IMPROVING THE QUALI- TY OF PUBLIC DEFENSE REPRESENTATION FROM NOT LESS THAN THREE NOMINEES SUBMITTED BY THE TEMPORARY PRESIDENT OF THE STATE SENATE; C. ONE ATTORNEY WITH A DEMONSTRABLE COMMITMENT TO IMPROVING THE QUALI- TY OF PUBLIC DEFENSE REPRESENTATION FROM NOT LESS THAN THREE NOMINEES SUBMITTED BY THE SPEAKER OF THE STATE ASSEMBLY; D. ONE ATTORNEY WITH A DEMONSTRABLE COMMITMENT TO IMPROVING THE QUALI- TY OF PUBLIC DEFENSE REPRESENTATION WHO HAS SUBSTANTIAL EXPERIENCE IN THE DELIVERY OF PUBLIC DEFENSE SERVICES FROM NOT LESS THAN THREE NOMI- NEES SUBMITTED BY THE MINORITY LEADER OF THE STATE SENATE; E. ONE ATTORNEY WITH A DEMONSTRABLE COMMITMENT TO IMPROVING THE QUALI- TY OF PUBLIC DEFENSE REPRESENTATION WHO HAS SUBSTANTIAL EXPERIENCE IN ADULT RESPONDENT REPRESENTATION IN FAMILY COURT FROM NOT LESS THAN THREE NOMINEES SUBMITTED BY THE MINORITY LEADER OF THE STATE ASSEMBLY; F. ONE ATTORNEY IN PRIVATE PRACTICE WITH A DEMONSTRABLE COMMITMENT TO IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF PUBLIC DEFENSE REPRESENTATION FROM NOT LESS THAN THREE NOMINEES SUBMITTED BY THE NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION; G. ONE PERSON WITH A DEMONSTRABLE COMMITMENT TO IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF PUBLIC DEFENSE REPRESENTATION FROM NOT LESS THAN THREE NOMINEES SUBMITTED BY THE NEW YORK STATE DEFENDERS ASSOCIATION; H. ONE PERSON WITH A DEMONSTRABLE COMMITMENT TO IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF PUBLIC DEFENSE REPRESENTATION FROM NOT LESS THAN THREE NOMINEES SUBMITTED BY THE NEW YORK STATE ASSOCIATION OF CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYERS; I. ONE PERSON WHO IS A MEMBER OF AN ORGANIZATION THAT ADVOCATES ON BEHALF OF A RACIAL MINORITY POPULATION IN NEW YORK FROM NOT LESS THAN THREE NOMINEES SUBMITTED BY THE NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND; J. ONE PERSON WHO IS A MEMBER OF AN ORGANIZATION THAT ADVOCATES ON BEHALF OF A RACIAL MINORITY POPULATION IN NEW YORK FROM NOT LESS THAN THREE NOMINEES SUBMITTED BY THE LATINO JUSTICE PUERTO RICAN LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FUND; AND K. ONE PERSON WITH EXPERIENCE AS A CONSUMER OF PUBLIC DEFENSE SERVICES WHO, HAVING BEEN EXONERATED OR HAVING PAID HIS OR HER DEBT TO SOCIETY BY SERVICE OF A SENTENCE, HAS DEMONSTRATED A COMMITMENT TO THE IMPROVEMENT A. 8793 5 OF LEGAL SERVICES FOR THOSE UNABLE TO AFFORD COUNSEL FROM NOT LESS THAN THREE NOMINEES SUBMITTED BY THE FORTUNE SOCIETY. 3. THE APPOINTMENT OF MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION SHALL BE COMPLETED WITHIN SIXTY DAYS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ARTICLE. S 499-F. PUBLIC DEFENSE COMMISSION; TERMS OF OFFICE; DESIGNATION OF CHAIRPERSON; RE-APPOINTMENT; VACANCIES AND COMPENSATION. 1. MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION SHALL SERVE TERMS OF FOUR YEARS; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT THE MEMBERS INITIALLY APPOINTED SHALL SERVE THE FOLLOWING TERMS: A. THE THREE MEMBERS APPOINTED PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPHS I, J, AND K OF SUBDIVI- SION TWO OF SECTION FOUR HUNDRED NINETY-NINE-E OF THIS ARTICLE, ONE YEAR; B. THE THREE MEMBERS APPOINTED PURSUANT TO SUBPARAGRAPHS (II) AND (III) OF PARAGRAPH A AND PARAGRAPH F OF SUBDIVISION TWO OF SECTION FOUR HUNDRED NINETY-NINE-E OF THIS ARTICLE, TWO YEARS; C. THE THREE MEMBERS APPOINTED PURSUANT TO SUBPARAGRAPH (I) OF PARAGRAPH A AND PARAGRAPHS G AND H OF SUBDIVISION TWO OF SECTION FOUR HUNDRED NINETY-NINE-E OF THIS ARTICLE, THREE YEARS; AND D. THE FOUR MEMBERS APPOINTED PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPHS B, C, D AND E OF SUBDIVISION TWO OF SECTION FOUR HUNDRED NINETY-NINE-E OF THIS ARTICLE, FOUR YEARS. 2. MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION SHALL SELECT BY MAJORITY VOTE A CHAIR- PERSON FROM AMONG THEIR RANKS FOR A TERM OF TWO YEARS. 3. MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION MAY BE RE-APPOINTED TO ADDITIONAL TERMS AND SHALL SERVE UNTIL THEIR SUCCESSORS ARE APPOINTED. 4. VACANCIES ON THE COMMISSION SHALL BE FILLED PROMPTLY AND FOR THE REMAINDER OF THE TERM IN THE MANNER PROVIDED FOR BY THE ORIGINAL APPOINTMENT. 5. MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION SHALL SERVE WITHOUT PAY BUT SHALL BE REIMBURSED FOR THEIR REASONABLE, ACTUAL AND NECESSARY EXPENSES INCURRED IN THE PERFORMANCE OF THEIR DUTIES. S 499-G. PUBLIC DEFENSE COMMISSION; GENERAL POWERS, DUTIES AND RESPON- SIBILITIES. THE COMMISSION SHALL HAVE THE POWER, DUTY AND RESPONSIBIL- ITY: 1. COMMENCING APRIL FIRST, TWO THOUSAND TWELVE, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STRATEGIC PLAN PROMULGATED PURSUANT TO SUBDIVISION FOUR OF THIS SECTION, TO OVERSEE AND ADMINISTER ALL PUBLIC DEFENSE SERVICES IN THE STATE THROUGH THE COMBINED APPLICATION OF SUCH STATE FUNDS AS MAY BE APPROPRIATED THEREFOR AND FIXED ANNUAL LOCAL OFFSET CONTRIBUTION MONIES AS DESCRIBED IN SECTION FOUR HUNDRED NINETY-NINE-M OF THIS ARTICLE, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO MONIES FROM THE INDIGENT LEGAL SERVICES FUND; 2. TO ENGAGE IN AN EVALUATION OF EXISTING PUBLIC DEFENSE SYSTEMS AND SERVICE PROVIDERS IN THE STATE BASED ON THE "STANDARDS FOR PROVIDING MANDATED REPRESENTATION" AS ADOPTED BY THE NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCI- ATION'S HOUSE OF DELEGATES AND THE "STANDARDS FOR PROVIDING CONSTITU- TIONALLY AND STATUTORILY MANDATED LEGAL REPRESENTATION IN NEW YORK STATE" AS ADOPTED BY THE NEW YORK STATE DEFENDERS ASSOCIATION'S BOARD OF DIRECTORS, AND SUCH OTHER STATE AND NATIONAL STANDARDS AS THE COMMISSION DEEMS APPROPRIATE, AND DEVELOP AND OVERSEE A SELF-EVALUATION PROCESS FOR EXISTING PUBLIC DEFENSE PROVIDERS; 3. TO CALCULATE THE COST OF PUBLIC DEFENSE SERVICES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE TOTAL ACTUAL COST OF THE CURRENT SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING SUCH SERVICES; THE PROJECTED COST WHEN THE SYSTEM IS SUBJECTED TO MEAN- INGFUL ECONOMIES OF SCALE, REDUCTION OF WASTE, AND ELIMINATION OF DUPLI- CATION; AND THE PROJECTED ADDITIONAL COSTS REQUIRED TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH NATIONAL, ETHICAL AND STATE PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS AND BEST PRAC- TICES; A. 8793 6 4. IN CONSULTATION WITH THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ESTABLISHED PURSUANT TO SUBDIVISION EIGHT OF THIS SECTION AND THE FINANCING TRANSITION ADVISORY COUNCIL ESTABLISHED BY SECTION FOUR HUNDRED NINETY-NINE-K OF THIS ARTI- CLE, TO PROMULGATE A STRATEGIC PLAN FOR THE ADMINISTRATION AND FUNDING OF TRIAL, APPELLATE, FAMILY AND CONFLICT PUBLIC DEFENSE SERVICES THROUGHOUT THE STATE. SUCH PLAN SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE PROVISIONS AND FURTHER THE PURPOSES OF THIS ARTICLE AND SHALL, AT A MINIMUM, PROVIDE FOR: A. THE DESIGNATION OF GEOGRAPHIC REGIONS TO ALLOW FOR THE MORE EFFICIENT AND EFFECTIVE PROVISION OF PUBLIC DEFENSE SERVICES, PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT REGIONS ENCOMPASSING MULTIPLE COUNTIES SHALL INCLUDE AT LEAST ONE STAFFED OFFICE IN EACH COUNTY SO AS TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE ACCESS BY CLIENTS TO PUBLIC DEFENSE SERVICES; B. THE AUTHORITY OF THE COMMISSION TO CONTRACT WITH NOT-FOR-PROFIT PUBLIC DEFENSE SERVICE PROVIDERS TO PROVIDE PUBLIC DEFENSE SERVICES TO CLIENTS; AND C. THE AUTHORITY OF THE COMMISSION TO DIRECTLY EMPLOY CRIMINAL DEFENSE ATTOR- NEYS, INVESTIGATORS AND OTHER PROFESSIONAL AND SUPPORT STAFF TO PROVIDE PUBLIC DEFENSE SERVICES TO CLIENTS. 5. COMMENCING TWELVE MONTHS AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ARTICLE AND UNTIL MARCH THIRTY-FIRST, TWO THOUSAND TWELVE, WHERE THE COMMISSION DEEMS IT APPROPRIATE, TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH ANY COUNTY THAT SEEKS TO DISCONTINUE ITS PLAN FOR PROVIDING COUNSEL AND RELATED SERVICES PURSUANT TO ARTICLE EIGHTEEN-B OF THE COUNTY LAW IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SUBDIVISION SIX OF SECTION SEVEN HUNDRED TWENTY-TWO OF THE COUNTY LAW; 6. TO ADOPT PROCEDURES FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SUBDIVISION SIX OF SECTION SEVEN HUNDRED TWENTY-TWO OF THE COUNTY LAW; 7. TO ESTABLISH THE QUALIFICATIONS, DUTIES AND COMPENSATION FOR THE STAFF OF THE COMMISSION AND APPOINT THE STATE DEFENDER IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION FOUR HUNDRED NINETY-NINE-H OF THIS ARTICLE, AND CONFLICT DEFENDER, IF ANY; 8. TO ESTABLISH AN ADVISORY COMMITTEE WHOSE MEMBERS SHALL INCLUDE PUBLIC DEFENSE PROVIDERS, REPRESENTATIVES FROM VOLUNTARY ORGANIZATIONS SUCH AS BAR ASSOCIATIONS, OTHER CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROFESSIONALS, AND CLIENT COMMUNITY REPRESENTATIVES TO ADVISE THE COMMISSION ABOUT DEFI- CIENCIES IN PUBLIC DEFENSE SERVICES, POTENTIAL WAYS TO CORRECT THOSE DEFICIENCIES AND THE COMMISSION'S OVERSIGHT AND PLANNING FUNCTIONS; 9. SUBJECT TO THE PROHIBITION SET FORTH IN SECTION FOUR HUNDRED NINE- TY-NINE-L OF THIS ARTICLE, TO ESTABLISH AND ENFORCE STATEWIDE STANDARDS FOR PUBLIC DEFENSE SERVICES TO ENSURE THAT QUALITY REPRESENTATION IS PROVIDED BY COMPETENT COUNSEL IN A MANNER THAT IS ZEALOUS, FAIR AND CONSISTENT THROUGHOUT THE STATE. SUCH STANDARDS SHALL REFLECT NATIONAL AND STATE PROFESSIONAL GUIDELINES AND BEST PRACTICES; 10. TO PREPARE REPORTS, IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE STATE DEFENDER, WHICH SHALL INCLUDE DETAILED EXPENDITURE AND CASELOAD DATA, DESCRIBE, EVALUATE AND ANALYZE THE NEEDS OF THE PUBLIC DEFENSE SYSTEM AND MAKE RECOMMENDA- TIONS FOR STATUTORY CHANGES, INCLUDING CHANGES IN THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW, THE PENAL LAW, THE FAMILY COURT ACT, AND RELATED STATUTES AND COURT RULES WHICH MAY BE APPROPRIATE FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE, THE REHABILITATION AND RE-ENTRY OF OFFENDERS AND OTHER RELATED OBJECTIVES. COMMENCING IN TWO THOUSAND TEN, ONE SUCH REPORT SHALL BE SUBMITTED ON OR BEFORE THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER OF EACH YEAR TO THE GOVERNOR, THE TEMPORARY PRESIDENT OF THE STATE SENATE, THE SPEAKER OF THE STATE ASSEMBLY, THE RESPECTIVE MINORITY LEADERS OF BOTH HOUSES, THE CHIEF JUDGE OF THE COURT OF APPEALS AND THE CHIEF ADMINIS- TRATIVE JUDGE OF THE UNIFIED COURT SYSTEM; AND A. 8793 7 11. TO PROPOSE SUCH AMENDMENTS TO EXISTING LAW AS MAY BE NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE TO EFFECTUATE THE PROVISIONS AND INTENT OF THIS ARTICLE AND DO ALL THINGS NECESSARY, CONVENIENT OR DESIRABLE, INCLUDING ANCILLARY AND INCIDENTAL ACTIVITIES, TO CARRY OUT ITS PURPOSES AND FOR THE EXER- CISE OF THE POWERS GRANTED IN THIS ARTICLE. S 499-H. STATE DEFENDER. 1. THE STATE DEFENDER APPOINTED PURSUANT TO SUBDIVISION SEVEN OF SECTION FOUR HUNDRED NINETY-NINE-G OF THIS ARTICLE SHALL BE AN ATTORNEY, SHALL SERVE AS THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF THE COMMISSION, SHALL HAVE THE AUTHORITY, IN CONSULTATION WITH THE COMMIS- SION, TO HIRE ATTORNEYS AND OTHER STAFF AND TO TAKE ALL OTHER SUCH ACTIONS AS THE STATE DEFENDER AND THE COMMISSION DEEM NECESSARY TO CARRY OUT THE PURPOSES OF THIS ARTICLE. IN ADDITION, THE STATE DEFENDER SHALL HAVE COMPLETE AUTHORITY, TO THE EXCLUSION OF ALL OTHERS, TO SUPERVISE THE PERSONNEL OF THE COMMISSION EXCEPT FOR THE CONFLICT DEFENDER, IF ANY, AND RELATED CONFLICT STAFF WITH REGARD TO CASE-RELATED MATTERS. 2. SALARY. A. THE SALARY OF THE STATE DEFENDER SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN THE COMPENSATION SET FOR THE HIGHEST PAID DISTRICT ATTORNEY IN THE STATE. B. ALL STAFF MEMBERS EMPLOYED BY THE COMMISSION UNDER THIS ARTICLE ARE ENTITLED TO FULL SALARIES, WAGES, BENEFITS AND PROMOTIONAL OPPORTUNITIES AS ACCORDED TO OTHER FULL-TIME STATE EMPLOYEES AND/OR MANAGEMENT CONFI- DENTIAL EMPLOYEES OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. C. THE COMMISSION SHALL DEVELOP A PLAN TO ESTABLISH FOR PUBLIC DEFENSE PROVIDERS NOT LESS THAN COMPARABLE RATES FOR COMPARABLE POSITIONS WITHIN THE DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICES OR WITHIN THAT OF OTHER GOVERNMENTAL ADVERSARIES. S 499-I. ASSISTANCE BY STATE OFFICES, DEPARTMENTS, BOARDS, DIVISIONS AND COMMISSIONS AND FROM LOCALITIES AND PUBLIC DEFENSE PROVIDERS. AT THE REQUEST OF THE COMMISSION, ALL OTHER STATE OFFICES, DEPARTMENTS, BOARDS, DIVISIONS AND COMMISSIONS, LOCALITIES AND PUBLIC DEFENSE PROVIDERS SHALL RENDER SUCH INFORMATION, ASSISTANCE AND COOPERATION AS SHALL BE WITHIN THEIR LEGAL AUTHORITY IN FURTHERANCE OF THE PURPOSES OF THIS ARTICLE. S 499-J. INDEPENDENCE; FISCAL DISCIPLINE. THE COMMISSION, WHILE MAIN- TAINING THE INDEPENDENCE OF THE DEFENSE FUNCTION, PROTECTING THE CONFI- DENTIALITY OF CLIENT RECORD KEEPING, AND ASSURING THE INTEGRITY OF PROCEDURES SUPPORTING THE REPRESENTATION OF PUBLIC DEFENSE CLIENTS, SHALL, IN CONSULTATION WITH THE DIVISION OF THE BUDGET AND THE FINANCING TRANSITION ADVISORY COUNCIL ESTABLISHED BY SECTION FOUR HUNDRED NINETY- NINE-K OF THIS ARTICLE, ADOPT SUCH POLICIES AND PROCEDURES AS MAY BE NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE TO ENSURE THAT THE COMMISSION OPERATES WITH A DEGREE OF FISCAL DISCIPLINE AND ACCOUNTABILITY COMPARABLE TO THAT REQUIRED OF EXECUTIVE AND OTHER AGENCIES OF THE STATE. S 499-K. FINANCING TRANSITION ADVISORY COUNCIL TO THE COMMISSION. 1. THERE SHALL BE ESTABLISHED FOR A PERIOD OF THREE YEARS A FINANCING TRAN- SITION ADVISORY COUNCIL CONSISTING OF FIFTEEN MEMBERS TO BE APPOINTED BY THE GOVERNOR TO SERVE AS AN ADVISORY BODY TO THE COMMISSION IN ACCORD- ANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION. EIGHT OF THE MEMBERS SHALL BE APPOINTED ON THE BASIS OF THEIR PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE WORKINGS OF COUNTY OR CITY GOVERNMENT, THEIR EXPERIENCE AS A COUNTY OFFICIAL IN THE PROVISION OF COUNTY SERVICES, THEIR EXPERIENCE AS AN OFFICIAL OR STAFF MEMBER OF THE NEW YORK STATE ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES OR OTHERWISE ON THE BASIS OF THEIR ADVOCACY FOR THE RIGHTS AND INTERESTS OF LOCALI- TIES. AT LEAST FIVE OF THE MEMBERS SHALL BE APPOINTED ON THE BASIS OF THEIR EXPERIENCE IN THE ADMINISTRATION OF STATE AID TO LOCALITIES, THEIR PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE METHODS AND PRACTICES OF THE NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF THE BUDGET, THEIR EXPERIENCE IN DESIGNING STATE AID A. 8793 8 PROGRAMS, THEIR EXPERTISE IN DESIGNING AND CALCULATING REVENUE STREAMS, OR SIMILAR STATE BUDGET EXPERTISE. IN MAKING SUCH APPOINTMENTS, THE GOVERNOR SHALL ENDEAVOR TO INSURE THAT THE OVERALL MEMBERSHIP OF THE COUNCIL ADEQUATELY REFLECTS THE RURAL, SUBURBAN AND URBAN AREAS OF THE STATE. 2. MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL SHALL BE APPOINTED FOR A TERM OF THREE YEARS. VACANCIES SHALL BE FILLED IN THE SAME MANNER AS ORIGINAL APPOINTMENTS FOR THE REMAINDER OF ANY UNEXPIRED TERM. 3. THE GOVERNOR SHALL DESIGNATE ONE MEMBER OF THE COUNCIL AS ITS CHAIR TO SERVE AS SUCH AT THE PLEASURE OF THE GOVERNOR. 4. COUNCIL MEMBERS SHALL NOT RECEIVE COMPENSATION, BUT EACH MEMBER SHALL BE ENTITLED TO RECEIVE HIS OR HER REASONABLE AND NECESSARY EXPENSES INCURRED IN CONNECTION WITH HIS OR HER SERVICES AS A MEMBER WITHIN THE AMOUNTS APPROPRIATED THEREFOR. 5. THE COUNCIL SHALL HAVE AN EXECUTIVE SECRETARY DESIGNATED BY THE CHAIR OF THE COMMISSION. THE CHAIR OF THE COMMISSION MAY ALSO ASSIGN SUCH OTHER COMMISSION OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES AS THE COMMISSION DEEMS PRUDENT TO ASSIST THE COUNCIL IN THE PERFORMANCE OF ITS DUTIES. 6. THE COUNCIL SHALL ADVISE AND ASSIST THE COMMISSION IN DEVELOPING POLICIES, PLANS AND PROGRAMS TO CARRY OUT A SEAMLESS TRANSITION FROM A PRIMARILY LOCALLY-FUNDED PUBLIC DEFENSE SYSTEM TO A PRIMARILY STATE-FUNDED PUBLIC DEFENSE SYSTEM ADMINISTERED EXCLUSIVELY BY THE COMMISSION. THE COUNCIL MAY CONSIDER ANY MATTER RELATED TO ENSURING THAT THE LONG-TERM RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE STATE AND LOCALITIES REGARDING THE ADMINISTRATION OF PUBLIC DEFENSE SERVICES BE EQUITABLE, TRANSPARENT, FAIR AND PERMANENT AND SHALL ADVISE THE COMMISSION ON ANY SUCH MATTER, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: A. DEVISING A FAIR AND EQUITABLE FORMULA FOR FIXING AND PERMANENTLY CAPPING OFFSET CONTRIBUTIONS BY LOCALITIES TO THE TOTAL COST OF PROVID- ING PUBLIC DEFENSE SERVICES, WHICH FORMULA SHALL, IF ADOPTED BY THE COMMISSION, BECOME EFFECTIVE NO EARLIER THAN TWO THOUSAND TWENTY-TWO. SUCH FORMULA SHOULD, AT A MINIMUM, ADDRESS AND CORRECT CURRENT INEQUI- TIES IN THE COMPARATIVE NET LOCAL EXPENDITURES MADE BY COUNTIES HISTOR- ICALLY AND CURRENTLY IN PROVIDING SERVICES PURSUANT TO ARTICLE EIGH- TEEN-B OF THE COUNTY LAW, AND INCLUDE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR METHODS TO ASSURE COUNTIES OF THE BONA FIDES OF THE STATE IN ITS LONG-TERM CAPPING OF THE FISCAL LIABILITY OF LOCALITIES; B. IDENTIFICATION OF INDIRECT COSTS NOW BORNE BY COUNTIES WHICH SHOULD BECOME STATE CHARGES AT THE TIME OF THE COMMISSION'S ASSUMPTION OF RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE PUBLIC DEFENSE SYSTEM; AND C. SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS THE COUNCIL DEEMS NECESSARY TO CONSIDER OR THE COMMISSION OR THE DIVISION OF THE BUDGET MAY REQUEST THAT IT CONSID- ER. 7. THE COUNCIL SHALL MEET AT THE REQUEST OF ITS CHAIR OR THE CHAIR OF THE COMMISSION AS NECESSARY BUT IN NO EVENT LESS THAN FOUR TIMES PER YEAR. S 499-L. ENFORCEMENT OF STANDARDS; PROHIBITION. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY PROVISION OF LAW TO THE CONTRARY, THE COMMISSION SHALL HAVE NO POWER OR AUTHORITY TO IMPOSE, ENFORCE OR OTHERWISE REQUIRE COMPLIANCE BY ANY LOCALITY OR PUBLIC DEFENSE SERVICE PROVIDER WITH ANY STANDARDS, INCLUD- ING BUT NOT LIMITED TO STANDARDS RELATING TO ATTORNEY CASELOADS, ETHICS, PROFESSIONAL TRAINING AND CLIENT ELIGIBILITY FOR PUBLIC DEFENSE SERVICES, UNTIL SUCH TIME AS THE COMMISSION, IN ACCORDANCE WITH SUBDIVI- SION ONE OF SECTION FOUR HUNDRED NINETY-NINE-G OF THIS ARTICLE, HAS ASSUMED COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE OVERSIGHT AND ADMINISTRATION OF PUBLIC DEFENSE SERVICES IN THE STATE. A. 8793 9 S 499-M. ELIMINATION OF LOCAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR PUBLIC DEFENSE SERVICES; FIXED ANNUAL LOCAL OFFSET CONTRIBUTION. 1. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY PROVISION OF LAW TO THE CONTRARY, EACH LOCALITY IN THE STATE SHALL BE PERMANENTLY RELIEVED OF THE OBLIGATION TO PROVIDE AND ADMINISTER PUBLIC DEFENSE SERVICES, AND THE ADMINISTRATION OF SUCH SERVICES SHALL BECOME SOLELY A STATE OBLIGATION AND CHARGE SUBJECT ONLY TO A FIXED OFFSET CONTRIBUTION TO BE PAID ANNUALLY BY EACH LOCALITY TO THE INDIGENT LEGAL SERVICES FUND TO THE CREDIT OF THE COMMISSION WHICH SHALL ADMINISTER SUCH SERVICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS ARTICLE; 2. THE AGGREGATE OFFSET SHALL BE IN THE AMOUNT OF THREE HUNDRED THIRTY-NINE MILLION DOLLARS AND LOCALITIES SHALL BE OBLIGATED TO PAY, ON AN ANNUAL BASIS, A PERCENTAGE OF THAT AMOUNT BASED ON THE AVERAGE OF THE PERCENT- AGES OF TOTAL NET LOCAL EXPENDITURES MADE BY THEM BETWEEN TWO THOUSAND TWO AND TWO THOUSAND EIGHT AS CALCULATED BY THE OFFICE OF THE STATE COMPTROLLER IN THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE INDIGENT LEGAL SERVICES FUND; PROVIDED HOWEVER, THAT (A) IN ACCORDANCE WITH PARAGRAPH A OF SUBDIVISION SIX OF SECTION FOUR HUNDRED NINETY-NINE-K OF THIS ARTICLE, THE COMMIS- SION MAY, COMMENCING IN TWO THOUSAND TWENTY-TWO, ADOPT AND IMPLEMENT A REVISED FIXED ANNUAL LOCAL OFFSET CONTRIBUTION AMOUNT FOR EACH LOCALITY BASED ON THE FORMULA RECOMMENDED TO THE COMMISSION BY THE FINANCING TRANSITION ADVISORY COUNCIL; AND (B) THE AGGREGATE AMOUNT OF ANY SUCH REVISED FIXED ANNUAL LOCAL OFFSET CONTRIBUTIONS SHALL NOT EXCEED THREE HUNDRED THIRTY-NINE MILLION DOLLARS. S 2. Section 722 of the county law is amended by adding a new subdivi- sion 6 to read as follows: 6. DISCONTINUANCE OF PLAN AT COUNTY REQUEST. (A) REQUEST TO PUBLIC DEFENSE COMMISSION. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY PROVISION OF THIS ARTICLE OR ARTICLE EIGHTEEN-A OF THIS CHAPTER TO THE CONTRARY, THE CHIEF ADMINIS- TRATIVE OFFICER OF A COUNTY OTHER THAN A COUNTY WHOLLY CONTAINED WITHIN A CITY MAY, WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE GOVERNING BOARD OF SUCH COUNTY AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE PROCEDURES PROMULGATED BY THE NEW YORK STATE PUBLIC DEFENSE COMMISSION ESTABLISHED PURSUANT TO ARTICLE FIFTEEN-A OF THE JUDICIARY LAW, REQUEST SUCH COMMISSION TO ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR PROVIDING COUNSEL AND RELATED SERVICES PURSUANT TO THIS ARTICLE TO PERSONS CHARGED WITH A CRIME OR OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO ASSIGNMENT OF COUNSEL PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION. (B) GRANTING OF REQUEST; ASSUMPTION OF RESPONSIBILITIES. WHERE, UPON SUCH TERMS AS MAY BE AGREED TO BY SUCH COUNTY AND THE COMMISSION, RESPONSIBILITY FOR PROVIDING COUN- SEL AND RELATED SERVICES PURSUANT TO THIS SUBDIVISION IS TRANSFERRED TO AND ASSUMED BY THE COMMISSION, SUCH COUNTY SHALL DISCONTINUE THE PLAN PLACED IN OPERATION PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION, WHEREUPON THE COST FOR PROVIDING COUNSEL AND ALL SERVICES OTHER THAN COUNSEL PURSUANT TO SECTION SEVEN HUNDRED TWENTY-TWO-C OF THIS ARTICLE SHALL BECOME SOLELY A COMMISSION CHARGE; PROVIDED, HOWEVER THAT SUCH COUNTY, DURING THE PERIOD OF SUCH DISCONTINUANCE AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF SUCH AGREE- MENT, SHALL PAY TO THE INDIGENT LEGAL SERVICES FUND ESTABLISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION NINETY-EIGHT-B OF THE STATE FINANCE LAW AN ANNUAL AGREED UPON DISCONTINUANCE OFFSET CONTRIBUTION TO THE CREDIT OF THE COMMISSION. NOTHING CONTAINED IN THIS SUBDIVISION SHALL BE DEEMED TO PRECLUDE THE SUBMISSION OF A JOINT REQUEST TO THE COMMISSION BY TWO OR MORE COUNTIES PURSUANT TO THIS SUBDIVISION. S 3. Articles 18-A and 18-B of the county law are REPEALED. S 4. Subdivisions 3 and 4 of section 98-b of the state finance law, subdivision 3 as amended by section 1 of part H of chapter 56 of the laws of 2004, paragraph (b) of subdivision 3 as amended by section 1 of part G of chapter 56 of the laws of 2005 and subdivision 4 as added by A. 8793 10 section 12 of part J of chapter 62 of the laws of 2003, are amended to read as follows: 3. (a) As provided in this subdivision, moneys received by the indi- gent legal services fund each calendar year from January first through December thirty-first shall be made available by the state comptroller in the immediately succeeding calendar year to (i) assist [counties and, in the case of a county wholly contained within a city, such city,] THE STATE in providing legal representation [for persons who are financially unable to afford counsel pursuant to article eighteen-B of the county law] PURSUANT TO THE PUBLIC DEFENSE ACT OF 2009; and (ii) assist the state, in funding representation provided by assigned counsel paid in accordance with section thirty-five of the judiciary law. Moneys from the fund shall be distributed at the direction of the state comptroller in accordance with the provisions of this subdivision. (b) (i) Commencing on March thirty-first, two thousand five, moneys from such fund shall first be made available, in the calendar year next succeeding the calendar year in which collected, to reimburse the state for payments, made in the previous calendar year, for assigned counsel paid in accordance with section thirty-five of the judiciary law, up to an annual sum of twenty-five million dollars. (ii) Commencing with the payment on April first, two thousand five or as soon thereafter as practicable, and subsequent quarterly payments thereafter, moneys from such fund shall be available to reimburse the state for providing funding for legal representation in periods and at rates of compensation in effect after January first, two thousand four in accordance with section thirty-five of the judiciary law, in an amount equal to such funding provided during the preceding quarter, less the amount of funding provided during that quarter in accordance with such section at rates of compensation in effect immediately prior to January first, two thousand four, up to but not exceeding six million two hundred fifty thousand dollars per quarter. (c) The balance of moneys received by such fund shall be distributed by the state comptroller, in the calendar year next succeeding the calendar year in which collected, to [counties and, in the case of a county wholly contained within a city, such city, to assist such coun- ties and such city in providing representation pursuant to article eigh- teen-B of the county law. The amount to be made available each year to such counties and such city shall be calculated by the state comptroller as follows: (i) The county executive or chief executive officer of each county or, in the case of a county wholly contained within a city, such city shall, in accordance with subdivision two of section seven hundred twenty-two-f of the county law, certify to the state comptroller, by March first of each year, the total expenditure of local funds by each such county or city, during the period January first through December thirty-first of the previous calendar year, for providing legal representation to persons who were financially unable to afford counsel, pursuant to arti- cle eighteen-B of the county law. (ii) The state comptroller shall then total the amount of local funds expended by all such counties and such city to determine the sum of such moneys expended by all such counties and such city for providing such representation in such calendar year. (iii) The state comptroller shall then calculate the percentage share of the statewide sum of such expenditures for each county and such city for such calendar year. (iv) The state comptroller shall then determine: A. 8793 11 (A) the fund amount available to be distributed pursuant to this para- graph, which shall be the amount received by the indigent legal services fund in the immediately preceding calendar year, minus the amount to be distributed to the state under paragraph (b) of this subdivision provided, however, that with respect to the first payment made to coun- ties and such city on March thirty-first, two thousand five, such payment shall be made from the amounts received by the indigent legal services fund in the immediately preceding two calendar years, minus the amount to be distributed to the state under paragraph (b) of this subdi- vision; and (B) the annual payment amount to be paid to each county and such city pursuant to this subdivision, which shall be the product of the percent- age share of statewide local funds expended by each such county and city, as determined pursuant to subparagraph (iii) of this paragraph, multiplied by the fund amount available for distribution, as determined pursuant to clause (A) of this subparagraph. (d) All payments from this account shall be made upon vouchers approved and certified and upon audit and warrant of the state comp- troller. The state comptroller shall, as soon as practicable, make such payments to the state and each county and each city in a lump sum payment] THE PUBLIC DEFENSE COMMISSION CREATED BY THE PUBLIC DEFENSE ACT OF 2009. [4. Maintenance of effort. (a) As used in this section, "local funds" shall mean all funds appropriated or allocated by a county or, in the case of a county wholly contained within a city, such city, for services and expenses in accordance with article eighteen-B of the county law, other than funds received from: (i) the federal government or the state; or (ii) a private source, where such city or county does not have authority or control over the payment of such funds by such private source. (b) State funds received by a county or city pursuant to subdivision three of this section shall be used to supplement and not supplant any local funds which such county or city would otherwise have had to expend for the provision of counsel and expert, investigative and other services pursuant to article eighteen-B of the county law. All such state funds received by a county or city shall be used to improve the quality of services provided pursuant to article eighteen-B of the coun- ty law. (c) Notwithstanding the provisions of any other law, as a precondition for receiving state assistance pursuant to subdivision three of this section, a county or city shall be required pursuant to this paragraph to demonstrate compliance with the maintenance of effort provisions of paragraph (b) of this subdivision. Such compliance shall be shown as a part of the annual report submitted by the county or city in accordance with subdivision two of section seven hundred twenty-two-f of the county law. Such maintenance of effort shall be shown by demonstrating with specificity: (i) that the total amount of local funds expended for services and expenses pursuant to article eighteen-B of the county law during the applicable calendar year reporting period did not decrease from the amount of such local funds expended during the previous calendar year provided, however, that with respect to the report filed in two thousand six regarding calendar year two thousand five, such maintenance of effort shall be shown by demonstrating with specificity that the total amount of local funds expended for services and expenses pursuant to article eighteen-B of the county law during the two thousand five calen- A. 8793 12 dar year did not decrease from the amount of such local funds expended during calendar year two thousand two; or (ii) where the amount of local funds expended for such services decreased over such period, that all state funds received during the most recent state fiscal year pursuant to subdivision three of this section were used to assure an improvement in the quality of services provided in accordance with article eighteen-B of the county law and have not been used to supplant local funds. For purposes of this subpar- agraph, whether there has been an improvement in the quality of such services shall be determined by considering the expertise, training and resources made available to attorneys, experts and investigators provid- ing such services; the total caseload handled by such attorneys, experts and investigators as such relates to the time expended in each case and the quality of services provided; the system by which attorneys were matched to cases with a degree of complexity suitable to each attorney's training and experience; the provision of timely and confidential access to such attorneys and expert and investigative services; and any other similar factors related to the delivery of quality public defense services.] S 5. This act shall take effect immediately; provided, however, that section 499-m of the judiciary law, as added by section one of this act, and the provisions of section three of this act shall take effect April 1, 2012; provided further the provisions of section four of this act shall take effect January 1, 2012; and, provided further the amendments to section 722 of the county law made by section two of this act shall take effect one year after such effective date.
Comments
Open Legislation is a forum for New York State legislation. All comments are subject to review and community moderation is encouraged.
Comments deemed off-topic, commercial, campaign-related, self-promotional; or that contain profanity, hate or toxic speech; or that link to sites outside of the nysenate.gov domain are not permitted, and will not be published. Attempts to intimidate and silence contributors or deliberately deceive the public, including excessive or extraneous posting/posts, or coordinated activity, are prohibited and may result in the temporary or permanent banning of the user. Comment moderation is generally performed Monday through Friday. By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and verify you are over 13.
Create an account. An account allows you to sign petitions with a single click, officially support or oppose key legislation, and follow issues, committees, and bills that matter to you. When you create an account, you agree to this platform's terms of participation.