S T A T E   O F   N E W   Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________
                                  2099
                       2009-2010 Regular Sessions
                            I N  S E N A T E
                            February 11, 2009
                               ___________
Introduced by Sen. FUSCHILLO -- read twice and ordered printed, and when
  printed to be committed to the Committee on Consumer Protection
AN  ACT  to  amend  the  general  business law, in relation to requiring
  sunscreen products to be labeled with a best if used before  date  and
  storage recommendations
  THE  PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
  Section 1. The general business law is amended by adding a new section
399-i to read as follows:
  S 399-I. DATE AND STORAGE LABELING OF SUNSCREEN PRODUCTS. 1. IT  SHALL
BE  UNLAWFUL  FOR  ANY  PERSON,  FIRM, CORPORATION, PARTNERSHIP, LIMITED
LIABILITY CORPORATION, OR OTHER ENTITY TO MANUFACTURE, FOR SALE, RESALE,
OR DISTRIBUTION IN THIS STATE, SUNSCREEN WHICH DOES NOT CONTAIN A  CLEAR
AND  CONSPICUOUS LABEL INDICATING A DATE ON WHICH THE PRODUCT IS BEST IF
USED BEFORE. THE DATE REQUIRED BY THIS SECTION SHALL BE LABELED BY MONTH
AND YEAR.
  2. IT SHALL BE UNLAWFUL FOR ANY PERSON,  FIRM,  CORPORATION,  PARTNER-
SHIP, LIMITED LIABILITY CORPORATION, OR OTHER ENTITY TO MANUFACTURE, FOR
SALE,  RESALE,  OR  DISTRIBUTION IN THIS STATE, SUNSCREEN WHICH DOES NOT
CONTAIN A CLEAR AND CONSPICUOUS LABEL  PROVIDING  INFORMATION  REGARDING
THE RECOMMENDED STORAGE OF SUCH SUNSCREEN PRODUCT.
  3. NO PERSON, FIRM, CORPORATION, PARTNERSHIP, LIMITED LIABILITY CORPO-
RATION,  OR  OTHER  ENTITY  SHALL SELL SUNSCREEN WHICH IT KNOWS DOES NOT
CONTAIN THE LABELING INFORMATION REQUIRED BY SUBDIVISIONS ONE AND TWO OF
THIS SECTION.
  4. FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION,  SUNSCREEN  SHALL  MEAN  SUNBLOCK  OR
SIMILAR LOTION OR TOPICAL PREPARATION MANUFACTURED AND SOLD FOR THE SOLE
PURPOSE  OF  PROTECTING  THE SKIN FROM SOLAR AND ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT EXPO-
SURE.
  5. (A) WHENEVER THERE SHALL BE A VIOLATION OF THIS SECTION, AN  APPLI-
CATION  MAY BE MADE BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL IN THE NAME OF THE PEOPLE OF
 EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                      [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                           LBD00906-01-9
              
             
                          
                
S. 2099                             2
THE STATE OF NEW YORK TO A COURT OR JUSTICE  HAVING  JURISDICTION  BY  A
SPECIAL  PROCEEDING  TO  ISSUE  AN  INJUNCTION,  AND  UPON NOTICE TO THE
DEFENDANT OF NOT LESS THAN FIVE DAYS, TO ENJOIN OR RESTRAIN THE  CONTIN-
UANCE  OF  SUCH VIOLATION; AND IF IT SHALL APPEAR TO THE SATISFACTION OF
THE COURT OR JUSTICE THAT THE DEFENDANT  HAS,  IN  FACT,  VIOLATED  THIS
ARTICLE, AN INJUNCTION MAY BE ISSUED BY SUCH COURT OR JUSTICE, ENJOINING
AND  RESTRAINING ANY FURTHER VIOLATION, WITHOUT REQUIRING PROOF THAT ANY
PERSON HAS, IN FACT, BEEN  INJURED  OR  DAMAGED  THEREBY.  IN  ANY  SUCH
PROCEEDING,  THE  COURT  MAY  MAKE ALLOWANCES TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL AS
PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH SIX OF SUBDIVISION  (A)  OF  SECTION  EIGHTY-THREE
HUNDRED  THREE  OF THE CIVIL PRACTICE LAW AND RULES, AND DIRECT RESTITU-
TION. WHENEVER THE COURT SHALL DETERMINE THAT A VIOLATION OF THIS  ARTI-
CLE  HAS OCCURRED, THE COURT MAY IMPOSE A CIVIL PENALTY OF NOT MORE THAN
TWO HUNDRED FIFTY DOLLARS FOR EACH SUCH VIOLATION.  IN  CONNECTION  WITH
ANY  SUCH  PROPOSED  APPLICATION,  THE ATTORNEY GENERAL IS AUTHORIZED TO
TAKE PROOF AND MAKE A DETERMINATION OF THE RELEVANT FACTS AND  TO  ISSUE
SUBPOENAS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CIVIL PRACTICE LAW AND RULES.
  (B)  IN  ADDITION  TO  THE  AUTHORITY  GRANTED TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION, ANY PERSON WHO HAS BEEN INJURED BY  REASON  OF
ANY VIOLATION OF THIS SECTION MAY BRING AN ACTION IN HIS OR HER OWN NAME
TO ENJOIN SUCH UNLAWFUL ACT OR PRACTICE. IN SUCH ACTION, SUCH PERSON MAY
RECOVER HIS OR HER ACTUAL DAMAGES OR TWO HUNDRED FIFTY DOLLARS, WHICHEV-
ER  IS  GREATER.  THE  COURT  MAY, IN ITS DISCRETION INCREASE THE DAMAGE
AWARD TO AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED ONE THOUSAND  DOLLARS.  THE  COURT  MAY
AWARD REASONABLE ATTORNEYS' FEES TO A PREVAILING PLAINTIFF.
  S  2. This act shall take effect on the first of January next succeed-
ing the date on which it shall have become a law.