S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________
2394
2009-2010 Regular Sessions
I N S E N A T E
February 19, 2009
___________
Introduced by Sens. DeFRANCISCO, VOLKER -- read twice and ordered print-
ed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Cities
AN ACT to amend the general municipal law, in relation to establishing
criteria for notice of claim to be filed and served when done by elec-
tronic means in a city having a population of over one million
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Paragraph (a) of subdivision 3 of section 50-e of the
general municipal law, as amended by chapter 745 of the laws of 1976, is
amended and a new paragraph (e) is added to read as follows:
(a) The notice shall be served on the public corporation against which
the claim is made by delivering a copy thereof personally, or by regis-
tered or certified mail, to the person designated by law as one to whom
a summons in an action in the supreme court issued against such corpo-
ration may be delivered, or to an attorney regularly engaged in repres-
enting such public corporation OR, IN A CITY WITH A POPULATION OF OVER
ONE MILLION, BY ELECTRONIC MEANS IN A FORM AND MANNER PRESCRIBED BY SUCH
CITY.
(E) IF THE NOTICE IS SERVED BY ELECTRONIC MEANS, AS DEFINED IN PARA-
GRAPH TWO OF SUBDIVISION (F) OF RULE TWENTY-ONE HUNDRED THREE OF THE
CIVIL PRACTICE LAW AND RULES, IT SHALL CONTAIN THE INFORMATION REQUIRED
UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF SUBDIVISION TWO OF THIS SECTION. IN ADDITION,
SUCH NOTICE SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING DECLARATION: "I CERTIFY THAT ALL
INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS NOTICE IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF
MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. I UNDERSTAND THAT THE WILLFUL MAKING OF ANY
FALSE STATEMENT OF MATERIAL FACT HEREIN WILL SUBJECT ME TO CRIMINAL
PENALTIES AND CIVIL LIABILITIES." SERVICE OF THE NOTICE SHALL BE
COMPLETE UPON SUCCESSFUL TRANSMISSION OF THE NOTICE AS INDICATED BY AN
ELECTRONIC RECEIPT PROVIDED BY SUCH CITY, WHICH SHALL TRANSMIT AN ELEC-
TRONIC RECEIPT NUMBER TO THE CLAIMANT FORTHWITH.
EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD01596-01-9
S. 2394 2
S 2. Subdivision 5 of section 50-e of the general municipal law, as
amended by chapter 745 of the laws of 1976, is amended to read as
follows:
5. Application for leave to serve a late notice.
Upon application, the court, in its discretion, may extend the time to
serve a notice of claim specified in paragraph (a) of subdivision one OF
THIS SECTION. The extension shall not exceed the time limited for the
commencement of an action by the claimant against the public corpo-
ration. In determining whether to grant the extension, the court shall
consider, in particular, whether the public corporation or its attorney
or its insurance carrier acquired actual knowledge of the essential
facts constituting the claim within the time specified in subdivision
one OF THIS SECTION or within a reasonable time thereafter. The court
shall also consider all other relevant facts and circumstances, includ-
ing: whether the claimant was an infant, or mentally or physically inca-
pacitated, or died before the time limited for service of the notice of
claim; whether the claimant failed to serve a timely notice of claim by
reason of his justifiable reliance upon settlement representations made
by an authorized representative of the public corporation or its insur-
ance carrier; whether the claimant in serving a notice of claim made an
excusable error concerning the identity of the public corporation
against which the claim should be asserted; IF SERVICE OF THE NOTICE OF
CLAIM IS ATTEMPTED BY ELECTRONIC MEANS PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (E) OF
SUBDIVISION THREE OF THIS SECTION, WHETHER THE DELAY IN SERVING THE
NOTICE OF CLAIM WAS BASED UPON THE FAILURE OF THE COMPUTER SYSTEM OF THE
CITY OR THE CLAIMANT OR THE ATTORNEY REPRESENTING THE CLAIMANT; THAT
SUCH CLAIMANT OR ATTORNEY, AS THE CASE MAY BE, SUBMITTED EVIDENCE OR
PROOF AS IS REASONABLE SHOWING THAT (I) THE SUBMISSION OF THE CLAIM WAS
ATTEMPTED TO BE ELECTRONICALLY MADE IN A TIMELY MANNER AND WOULD HAVE
BEEN COMPLETED BUT FOR THE FAILURE OF THE COMPUTER SYSTEM UTILIZED BY
THE SENDER OR RECIPIENT, AND (II) THAT UPON BECOMING AWARE OF BOTH THE
FAILURE OF SUCH SYSTEM AND THE FAILURE OF THE CITY TO RECEIVE SUCH
SUBMISSION, THE CLAIMANT OR ATTORNEY HAD INSUFFICIENT TIME TO MAKE SUCH
CLAIM WITHIN THE PERMITTED TIME PERIOD IN A MANNER AS OTHERWISE
PRESCRIBED BY LAW; and whether the delay in serving the notice of claim
substantially prejudiced the public corporation in maintaining its
defense on the merits.
An application for leave to serve a late notice shall not be denied on
the ground that it was made after commencement of an action against the
public corporation.
S 3. This act shall take effect on the one hundred eightieth day after
it shall have become a law.