S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________
3497
2009-2010 Regular Sessions
I N S E N A T E
March 20, 2009
___________
Introduced by Sens. ADDABBO, DILAN, HUNTLEY, C. JOHNSON, MONSERRATE,
ONORATO, SAVINO, THOMPSON -- read twice and ordered printed, and when
printed to be committed to the Committee on Civil Service and Pensions
AN ACT to amend the civil service law, in relation to binding arbi-
tration for court clerks and uniformed court officers of the unified
court system
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Section 209 of the civil service law is amended by adding a
new subdivision 6 to read as follows:
6. (A) IN THE EVENT THAT THE BOARD CERTIFIES THAT A VOLUNTARY RESOL-
UTION OF THE CONTRACT NEGOTIATIONS BETWEEN THE UNIFIED COURT SYSTEM AND
THE PUBLIC EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION CERTIFIED OR RECOGNIZED TO REPRESENT
THE NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NEGOTIATING UNIT, NASSAU COUNTY NEGOTIATING
UNIT, SUFFOLK COUNTY NEGOTIATING UNIT, NEW YORK CITY SENIOR COURT OFFI-
CERS NEGOTIATING UNIT, NEW YORK CITY COURT REPORTERS NEGOTIATING UNIT,
NEW YORK CITY COURT OFFICERS NEGOTIATING UNIT AND NEW YORK CITY COURT
CLERKS NEGOTIATING UNIT SUCH BOARD SHALL REFER THE DISPUTE TO A PUBLIC
ARBITRATION PANEL, CONSISTING OF ONE MEMBER APPOINTED BY THE UNIFIED
COURT SYSTEM, ONE MEMBER APPOINTED BY THE EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION AND ONE
PUBLIC MEMBER APPOINTED JOINTLY BY THE UNIFIED COURT SYSTEM AND THE
EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION WHO SHALL BE SELECTED WITHIN TEN DAYS AFTER
RECEIPT BY THE BOARD OF A PETITION FOR CREATION OF THE ARBITRATION
PANEL. IF EITHER PARTY FAILS TO DESIGNATE ITS MEMBER TO THE PUBLIC ARBI-
TRATION PANEL, THE BOARD SHALL PROMPTLY, UPON RECEIPT OF A REQUEST BY
EITHER PARTY, DESIGNATE A MEMBER ASSOCIATED IN INTEREST WITH THE UNIFIED
COURT SYSTEM OR EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION HE OR SHE IS TO REPRESENT. EACH OF
THE RESPECTIVE PARTIES IS TO BEAR THE COST OF ITS MEMBER APPOINTED OR
DESIGNATED TO THE ARBITRATION PANEL AND EACH OF THE RESPECTIVE PARTIES
IS TO SHARE EQUALLY THE COST OF THE PUBLIC MEMBER. IF, WITHIN SEVEN DAYS
AFTER THE MAILING DATE, THE PARTIES ARE UNABLE TO AGREE UPON THE ONE
EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD07377-01-9
S. 3497 2
PUBLIC MEMBER, THE BOARD SHALL SUBMIT TO THE PARTIES A LIST OF QUALI-
FIED, DISINTERESTED PERSONS FOR THE SELECTION OF THE PUBLIC MEMBER. EACH
PARTY SHALL ALTERNATELY STRIKE FROM THE LIST ONE OF THE NAMES WITH THE
ORDER OF STRIKING DETERMINED BY LOT, UNTIL THE REMAINING ONE PERSON
SHALL BE DESIGNATED AS PUBLIC MEMBER. THIS PROCESS SHALL BE COMPLETED
WITHIN FIVE DAYS OF RECEIPT OF THIS LIST. THE PARTIES SHALL NOTIFY THE
BOARD OF THE DESIGNATED PUBLIC MEMBER. THE PUBLIC MEMBER SHALL BE CHOSEN
AS CHAIRPERSON.
(B) THE ARBITRATION PANEL SHALL HOLD HEARINGS ON ALL MATTERS WITHIN
THE SCOPE OF NEGOTIATIONS RELATED TO THE DISPUTE FOR WHICH THE PANEL WAS
APPOINTED. THE PARTIES MAY BE HEARD EITHER IN PERSON, BY COUNSEL OR BY
OTHER REPRESENTATIVES AS THEY MAY RESPECTIVELY DESIGNATE. THE PARTIES
MAY PRESENT, EITHER ORALLY OR IN WRITING OR BOTH, STATEMENT OF FACT,
SUPPORTING WITNESSES AND OTHER EVIDENCE AND ARGUMENT OF THEIR RESPECTIVE
POSITION WITH RESPECT TO EACH CASE. THE PANEL SHALL HAVE AUTHORITY TO
REQUIRE THE PRODUCTION OF SUCH ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE, EITHER ORAL OR WRIT-
TEN, AS IT MAY DESIRE FROM THE PARTIES AND SHALL PROVIDE AT THE REQUEST
OF EITHER PARTY THAT A FULL AND COMPLETE RECORD BE KEPT OF ANY SUCH
HEARINGS, THE COST OF SUCH RECORD TO BE SHARED EQUALLY BY THE PARTIES.
(C) ALL MATTERS PRESENTED TO SUCH PANEL FOR ITS DETERMINATION SHALL BE
DECIDED BY A MAJORITY VOTE OF THE MEMBERS OF THE PANEL. THE PANEL, PRIOR
TO A VOTE ON ANY ISSUE IN DISPUTE BEFORE IT, MAY REFER THE ISSUE BACK TO
THE PARTIES FOR FURTHER NEGOTIATIONS.
(D) SUCH PANEL SHALL MAKE A JUST AND REASONABLE DETERMINATION OF
MATTERS IN DISPUTE. IN ARRIVING AT SUCH DETERMINATION, THE PANEL SHALL
SPECIFY THE BASIS FOR ITS FINDINGS, TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION, IN ADDI-
TION TO ANY OTHER RELEVANT FACTORS, THE FOLLOWING: (I) COMPARISON OF THE
WAGES, HOURS, FRINGE BENEFITS, CONDITIONS AND CHARACTERISTICS OF EMPLOY-
MENT OF THE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES INVOLVED IN THE IMPASSE PROCEEDING WITH THE
WAGES, HOURS, FRINGE BENEFITS, CONDITIONS AND CHARACTERISTICS OF EMPLOY-
MENT OF OTHER EMPLOYEES PERFORMING SIMILAR WORK AND OTHER EMPLOYEES
GENERALLY IN PUBLIC OR PRIVATE EMPLOYMENT IN NEW YORK CITY OR COMPARABLE
COMMUNITIES; (II) THE OVERALL COMPENSATION PAID TO THE EMPLOYEES
INVOLVED IN THE IMPASSE PROCEEDING, INCLUDING DIRECT WAGE COMPENSATION,
OVERTIME AND PREMIUM PAY, VACATIONS, HOLIDAYS AND OTHER EXCUSED TIME,
INSURANCE, PENSIONS, MEDICAL AND HOSPITALIZATION BENEFITS, FOOD AND
APPAREL FURNISHED, AND ALL OTHER BENEFITS RECEIVED; (III) THE IMPACT OF
THE PANEL'S AWARD ON THE FINANCIAL ABILITY OF THE UNIFIED COURT SYSTEM
TO PAY, ON THE PRESENT FARES AND ON THE CONTINUED PROVISION OF SERVICES
TO THE PUBLIC; (IV) CHANGES IN THE AVERAGE CONSUMER PRICES FOR GOODS AND
SERVICES, COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE COST OF LIVING; (V) THE INTEREST AND
WELFARE OF THE PUBLIC; AND (VI) SUCH OTHER FACTORS AS ARE NORMALLY AND
CUSTOMARILY CONSIDERED IN THE DETERMINATION OF WAGES, HOURS, FRINGE
BENEFITS AND OTHER WORKING CONDITIONS IN COLLECTIVE NEGOTIATIONS OR
IMPASSE PANEL PROCEEDINGS.
(E) THE PANEL SHALL HAVE FULL AUTHORITY TO RESOLVE THE MATTERS IN
DISPUTE BEFORE IT AND ISSUE A DETERMINATION WHICH SHALL BE FINAL AND
BINDING UPON THE PARTIES, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF THIS
ARTICLE. EXCEPT FOR THE PURPOSES OF JUDICIAL REVIEW, ANY PROVISION OF A
DETERMINATION OF THE ARBITRATION PANEL, THE IMPLEMENTATION OF WHICH
REQUIRES AN ENACTMENT OF LAW, SHALL NOT BECOME BINDING UNTIL THE APPRO-
PRIATE LEGISLATIVE BODY ENACTS SUCH LAW.
S 2. This act shall take effect immediately.