|Assembly Actions - Lowercase
Senate Actions - UPPERCASE
|Mar 12, 2012||committee discharged and committed to rules|
notice of committee consideration - requested
|Jan 04, 2012||referred to codes|
|Feb 15, 2011||referred to codes|
senate Bill S3276
Relates to exculpatory material
Archive: Last Bill Status - In Committee
- In Committee
- On Floor Calendar
- Passed Senate
- Passed Assembly
- Delivered to Governor
- Signed/Vetoed by Governor
view actions (4)
S3276 - Bill Details
- Current Committee:
- Law Section:
- Criminal Procedure Law
- Laws Affected:
- Add §240.25, amd §§240.20 & 440.10, CP L
- Versions Introduced in 2009-2010 Legislative Session:
S3276 - Bill Texts
Relates to exculpatory material and requires for disclosure of such to the defense.
view sponsor memo
TITLE OF BILL:
to amend the criminal procedure law, in relation to exculpatory material
To provide definitions of exculpatory information, to clarify what
information must be delivered, establish the timeframe within which
it must be delivered, and provide for circumstances where there has
been a violation.
SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS:
Section 1 of the bill adds a new §240.25 to the Criminal Procedure Law
(CPL) to provide definitions of exculpatory information, to clarify
what information must be delivered and establish the timeframe with
in which it must be delivered and provide for circumstances where
there has been a violation.
Section 2 of the bill amends Subdivision 1 of CPL §240.20 to add a new
paragraph 1 to provide the circumstances under which a prosecutor
must disclose information resulting from DNA testing.
Section 3 of the bill amends Subdivision 1 of CPL §440.10 to add a
new paragraph j to provide the circumstances under which a court may
vacate a judgment for failure of the prosecution to provide to the
defense exculpatory information as required by law.
Section 4 of the bill provides the effective date.
This is one of six bills that are based on the recommendations of the
Task Force on Wrongful Convictions of the New York State Bar
Association. That Task Force was created in 2008, and examined 53,
cases where a defendant was wrongfully convicted of a crime and later
Through this study, the Task Force identified what it found to be the
causes of these mistakes. Its report was approved by the Bar
Association in 2009, and this bill is intended to address one of the
causes that were so identified.
All prosecutors in all cases have an obligation to deliver exculpatory
and favorable information to the defense relevant to the issues of guilt
and punishment. In Brady 7.1 Maryland, where the evidence was relevant
to the determining punishment, the u.s. Supreme Court held that the
turnover of the information is a requirement of due process. 373 U.s.
New York State has set the rule with equal clarity. People v
Santorelli, 95 N.Y.2d 412, 421 (2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 1008
(2001); People v Baxley, 84 N. Y. 2d 208, 212-14 (1994).
The obligation of prompt turnover is a continuing one triggered by
Brady material coming to the knowledge of anyone working on or
associated with the investigation of the case. By statute, Criminal
Procedure Law section 240.20, delivery is required once a pretrial
defense motion is made and granted. However, Brady material is often
not delivered until just before the trial begins or during the trial
even if the state is in possession of the information earlier. It has
been held that the failure to give the defense exculpatory evidence,
which the prosecutor had for several months, until the eve of trial
was inexcusable. People v Baba Ali, 179 AD.2d at 729-30.
The cases studied by the Task Force, as well as its sampling of
decisions, show that Brady violations are a continuing problem,
denying the defendant a fair opportunity to organize and present his
case. This bill is intended to better assure compliance by the
creation of new rules applicable to the delivery of Brady material.
The bill defines "exculpatory information" to clarify which materials
must be delivered. It also sets time deadlines for delivery, makes
clear that the obligation is continuing and that it applies to
materials in the possession of agencies assisting the prosecution. A
pre-trial conference would be required, where the court would receive
a certification from the prosecutor that there has been compliance
and examine into any outstanding issues. Finally, the bill authorizes
various sanctions for noncompliance to be imposed at the court's
discretion, and provides for reference to a disciplinary body where a
failure to comply is intentional or reckless. Together, these
provisions should far improve compliance with Brady obligations.
2009-10: S.7893 - Referred to Codes
2009-10: A.11446-A - Referred to Rules (Espaillat)
To be determined.
This act shall take effect on the sixtieth day after becoming law.
view full text
S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K ________________________________________________________________________ 3276 2011-2012 Regular Sessions I N S E N A T E February 15, 2011 ___________ Introduced by Sen. HASSELL-THOMPSON -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Codes AN ACT to amend the criminal procedure law, in relation to exculpatory material THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM- BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The criminal procedure law is amended by adding a new section 240.25 to read as follows: S 240.25 DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION EXCULPATORY TO THE DEFENSE. 1. DEFINITION. EXCULPATORY INFORMATION INCLUDES, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO, INFORMATION THAT IS MATERIAL AND FAVORABLE TO THE ACCUSED BECAUSE THE INFORMATION: (A) CASTS DOUBT ON WHETHER THE CONDUCT OF THE ACCUSED SATISFIED ONE OR MORE OF THE ELEMENTS OF A CRIME CHARGED IN THE INDICTMENT, INFORMATION, OR OTHER CHARGING INSTRUMENT; (B) CASTS DOUBT ON WHETHER THE CRIME CHARGED OCCURRED; (C) CASTS DOUBT ON THE ADMISSIBILITY OF EVIDENCE THAT THE PROSECUTOR ANTICIPATES OFFERING IN THE PROSECUTION'S CASE-IN-CHIEF BECAUSE THE INFORMATION PROVIDES A BASIS FOR A MOTION TO SUPPRESS OR EXCLUDE SUCH EVIDENCE; (D) CASTS DOUBT ON THE CREDIBILITY OR ACCURACY OF TESTIMONY OR OTHER EVIDENCE THAT THE PROSECUTOR ANTICIPATES OFFERING IN HIS OR HER CASE-IN-CHIEF; (E) DIMINISHES THE DEGREE OF THE ACCUSED'S CULPABILITY OR THE LEVEL OF OFFENSE CHARGED; (F) SUPPORTS A DEFENSE TO THE CHARGE OR CHARGES PENDING AGAINST THE ACCUSED; (G) MITIGATES, REDUCES OR AFFECTS THE SENTENCE THAT MUST OR MIGHT BE IMPOSED; (H) TENDS TO LEAD TO INFORMATION THAT WOULD SATISFY PARAGRAPHS (A) THROUGH (G) OF THIS SUBDIVISION. EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [ ] is old law to be omitted. LBD07101-01-1 S. 3276 2 2. TIMING OF FIRST DELIVERY OF INFORMATION. WITHOUT A MOTION BY THE DEFENSE, THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION MUST BE DISCLOSED AND DELIVERED BY THE PROSECUTION TO THE DEFENSE WITHIN TWENTY-EIGHT DAYS OF ARRAIGNMENT ON THE FIRST CHARGING INSTRUMENT: (A) INFORMATION THAT CASTS DOUBT ON THE GUILT OF THE ACCUSED OF ANY CHARGE IN THE INDICTMENT, INFORMATION OR OTHER CHARGING INSTRUMENT; (B) INFORMATION THAT CASTS DOUBT ON THE ADMISSIBILITY OF EVIDENCE THAT THE PROSECUTOR ANTICIPATES OFFERING IN HIS OR HER CASE-IN-CHIEF AND THAT COULD BE THE BASIS OF A MOTION TO SUPPRESS OR EXCLUDE; (C) A STATEMENT AS TO WHETHER ANY PROMISE, REWARD, OR INDUCEMENT HAS BEEN GIVEN TO ANY WITNESS WHOM THE PROSECUTOR ANTICIPATES CALLING IN HIS OR HER CASE-IN-CHIEF, IDENTIFYING BY NAME EACH SUCH WITNESS AND EACH PROMISE, REWARD, OR INDUCEMENT, AND A COPY OF ANY PROMISE, REWARD, OR INDUCEMENT THAT HAS BEEN REDUCED TO WRITING OR PRINT; (D) A COPY OF ANY CRIMINAL RECORD OF ANY WITNESS IDENTIFIED BY NAME WHOM THE PROSECUTOR ANTICIPATES CALLING IN HIS OR HER CASE-IN-CHIEF INCLUDING THE COURT OF CONVICTION, THE CRIME OF WHICH THE WITNESS WAS CONVICTED, THE DATE OF THE CONVICTION, AND THE NUMBER OF THE CASE; (E) A WRITTEN STATEMENT SETTING OUT CRIMINAL CHARGES PENDING AGAINST A WITNESS, WHO SHALL BE IDENTIFIED BY NAME, WHOM THE PROSECUTOR ANTIC- IPATES CALLING IN HIS OR HER CASE-IN-CHIEF; (F) A WRITTEN STATEMENT SETTING OUT THE FAILURE OF A POTENTIAL WITNESS, WHO SHALL BE IDENTIFIED BY NAME, TO MAKE A POSITIVE IDENTIFICA- TION OF THE ACCUSED IN AN IDENTIFICATION PROCEDURE THAT HAS BEEN HELD WITH SUCH A WITNESS WITH RESPECT TO THE CRIME; (G) A WRITTEN OR ORAL STATEMENT FROM ANY PERSON OR OTHER INFORMATION THAT TENDS TO SUPPORT A DEFENSE TO THE CHARGES. 3. PRETRIAL DELIVERY. WITHOUT A MOTION BY THE DEFENSE, THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION MUST BE DISCLOSED AND DELIVERED NOT LATER THAN TWENTY-ONE DAYS PRIOR TO THE DATE FIRST SET FOR TRIAL: (A) INFORMATION THAT CASTS DOUBT ON THE CREDIBILITY OR ACCURACY OF EVIDENCE, INCLUDING TESTIMONY OF WITNESSES, CONCERNING MATERIAL ISSUES RELATING TO WHETHER A CRIME WAS COMMITTED AND WHETHER THE ACCUSED COMMITTED IT, THAT THE PROSECUTOR ANTICIPATES PRESENTING IN HIS OR HER CASE-IN-CHIEF; (B) ANY INCONSISTENT WRITTEN OR ORAL STATEMENT REGARDING THE ALLEGED CRIMINAL CONDUCT OF THE ACCUSED OR A DESCRIPTION OF SUCH STATEMENT, MADE BY A PERSON WHOM THE PROSECUTION ANTICIPATES CALLING IN HIS OR HER CASE-IN-CHIEF; (C) ANY STATEMENT REGARDING THE ALLEGED CRIMINAL CONDUCT OF THE ACCUSED OR A DESCRIPTION OF SUCH STATEMENT, MADE ORALLY OR IN WRITING BY ANY PERSON, THAT IS INCONSISTENT WITH A STATEMENT MADE ORALLY OR IN WRITING BY A WITNESS THE PROSECUTION ANTICIPATES CALLING IN HIS OR HER CASE-IN-CHIEF; (D) ANY INFORMATION REFLECTING BIAS OR PREJUDICE AGAINST THE DEFENDANT BY A WITNESS WHOM THE PROSECUTOR ANTICIPATES CALLING IN HIS OR HER CASE-IN-CHIEF; (E) A WRITTEN DESCRIPTION OF ANY PRIOR BAD ACT THAT CONSTITUTES A CRIME KNOWN BY THE PROSECUTOR TO HAVE BEEN COMMITTED BY ANY WITNESS WHOM THE PROSECUTION ANTICIPATES CALLING IN HIS OR HER CASE-IN-CHIEF; (F) INFORMATION KNOWN OR ASCERTAINABLE TO THE PROSECUTOR OF ANY MENTAL OR PHYSICAL IMPAIRMENT OF ANY WITNESS WHOM THE PROSECUTOR ANTICIPATES CALLING IN HIS OR HER CASE-IN-CHIEF THAT MAY CAST DOUBT ON THE ABILITY OF THAT WITNESS TO OBSERVE AND ACCURATELY AND TRUTHFULLY RECALL, AND TO RELATE INFORMATION ABOUT A RELEVANT EVENT OR OTHER MATERIAL INFORMATION; S. 3276 3 (G) ANY OTHER INFORMATION THAT IS WITHIN THE DEFINITION SET OUT IN SUBDIVISION ONE OF THIS SECTION; (H) ANYTHING REQUIRED TO BE DISCLOSED, PRIOR TO TRIAL, TO THE DEFEND- ANT BY THE PROSECUTOR, PURSUANT TO THE CONSTITUTION OF THIS STATE OR OF THE UNITED STATES. 4. DELIVERY OF INFORMATION. THE PROSECUTOR SHALL DISCLOSE TO THE DEFENDANT AND MAKE AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION, EXAMINATION, PHOTOCOPYING, COPYING, PRINT OUT, RETRIEVAL, TESTING, OR INTERVIEW (FOR STATEMENTS PREVIOUSLY MADE BUT NOT RECORDED IN WRITING OR MECHANICALLY) OR BY ANY OTHER METHOD OF ACCESS, ALL INFORMATION INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THAT IN PROPERTY, DOCUMENTS, REPORTS, RECORDINGS, VIDEOS, RECORDS, IN THE KNOWLEDGE OF A PERSON BUT NOT RECORDED (ALL HEREINAFTER CALLED INFORMATION) WHICH WOULD PROVIDE THE INFORMATION SET OUT IN SUBDIVISIONS ONE, TWO, AND THREE OF THIS SECTION REGARDLESS OF WHETHER SUCH INFORMA- TION WOULD ITSELF CONSTITUTE ADMISSIBLE EVIDENCE AT TRIAL OR IS OTHER- WISE KNOWN TO THE DEFENDANT. 5. CONTINUING OBLIGATION. IF AT ANY TIME AFTER THE TIME PERIODS SET FORTH ABOVE THE PROSECUTOR LEARNS OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED TO BE DISCLOSED TO THE DEFENDANT PURSUANT TO SUBDIVISIONS ONE, TWO AND THREE OF THIS SECTION, THE PROSECUTOR SHALL, PURSUANT TO THE CONTINUING OBLIGATION TO DELIVER TO THE DEFENSE THE INFORMATION REQUIRED BY SUBDI- VISIONS ONE, TWO AND THREE OF THIS SECTION, PROMPTLY NOTIFY THE DEFEND- ANT AND THE COURT OF THE EXISTENCE OF SUCH INFORMATION AND EXPEDITIOUSLY MAKE SUCH ITEMS AVAILABLE TO THE DEFENDANT FOR INSPECTION, PHOTOCOPYING, COPYING, TESTING OR OTHER REPRODUCTION AS SET OUT IN SUBDIVISION FOUR OF THIS SECTION. 6. APPLICATION TO THE COURT. (A) THE PROSECUTOR MAY SEEK A PROTECTIVE ORDER BASED ON A REASONABLE SHOWING THAT A WITNESS OR OTHER PERSON WOULD BE ENDANGERED BY DISCLOSURE OF THE INFORMATION REQUIRED BY THIS SECTION. IF THE COURT FINDS THAT THE PROSECUTOR HAS MADE A REASONABLE SHOWING THAT A WITNESS OR OTHER PERSON WOULD BE ENDANGERED BY DISCLOSURE, THE COURT SHALL CONDUCT AN IN CAMERA REVIEW OF THE CLAIM, AND, IF APPROPRI- ATE, REDACT THE INFORMATION GIVEN TO THE DEFENSE UNTIL SUCH TIME AS THE LAW OR OTHER CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE REQUIRE DISCLOSURE OF THE INFOR- MATION. (B) IF IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF A CASE, THE PROSECUTOR, AT ANY TIME, ASSERTS THAT INFORMATION WAS NOT DELIVERED OR WAS DELIVERED LATE OR IS NOT EXCULPATORY WITHIN THE TERMS OF THIS STATUTE OR AS REQUIRED BY THE STATE OR UNITED STATES CONSTITUTIONS AND WAS NOT DELIVERED BASED ON THAT REASON, THE COURT SHALL MAKE AN INDEPENDENT EVALUATION AND DETERMI- NATION, AFTER HEARING FROM DEFENSE COUNSEL, AS TO WHETHER THE INFORMA- TION SHOULD BE DELIVERED PURSUANT TO THIS SUBDIVISION. (C) THE PROSECUTOR'S VIEW OF WHETHER THE INFORMATION IS TRUTHFUL OR ACCURATE SHALL NOT BE A FACTOR USED BY THE PROSECUTOR OR THE COURT TO DETERMINE WHETHER THE INFORMATION MUST BE DELIVERED TO THE DEFENSE PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION. 7. INQUIRIES. PRIOR TO THE REQUIRED DATES FOR THE DISCLOSURE OF INFOR- MATION TO THE DEFENSE, THE PROSECUTOR SHALL MAKE INQUIRIES TO LEARN WHETHER THOSE AGENCIES DEEMED BY LAW TO BE ASSISTING THE PROSECUTOR ARE IN POSSESSION OF INFORMATION DEFINED IN SUBDIVISIONS ONE, TWO, AND THREE OF THIS SECTION, AND SHALL OBTAIN THE INFORMATION FOR DELIVERY TO THE DEFENSE IN ACCORD WITH THIS SECTION. 8. CONFERENCE AND CERTIFICATION. (A) AT A TIME SET BY THE COURT BEFORE THE FIRST DESIGNATED TRIAL DATE AND AT SUCH FURTHER TIMES AS THE COURT ORDERS, THE PROSECUTOR SHALL IDENTIFY FOR THE COURT THE INFORMATION THAT HAS BEEN DELIVERED TO THE DEFENSE AND CERTIFY THE DELIVERY. THE COURT S. 3276 4 SHALL HOLD A CONFERENCE TO DETERMINE WHETHER THE PROSECUTOR HAS EXAMINED THE PROSECUTOR'S FILE AND THE FILES OF THOSE ASSISTING THE PROSECUTOR AND HAS DELIVERED THE REQUIRED INFORMATION. (B) IF THE PROSECUTOR DELIVERS TO THE DEFENSE PURSUANT TO THIS STATUTE LARGE QUANTITIES OF INFORMATION, WHETHER OF DOCUMENTS, ELECTRONIC INFOR- MATION, OR OTHER FORMAT, WITHOUT IDENTIFICATION OF ITS SIGNIFICANCE TO THE CASE, THE COURT SHALL ESTABLISH IN THE CONFERENCE THE PROCEDURE FOR IDENTIFICATION OF THE INFORMATION AND IF NEEDED GRANT AN ADJOURNMENT FOR THAT TO BE ACCOMPLISHED BY THE PROSECUTOR AND EXAMINED BY THE DEFENSE. 9. SANCTIONS FOR LATE DELIVERY OR FAILURE TO DELIVER INFORMATION DEFINED IN THIS SECTION. WHERE THERE IS A FAILURE BY THE PROSECUTOR TO DELIVER THE INFORMATION SET OUT IN THIS SECTION, OR THE INFORMATION IS DELIVERED AFTER THE REQUIRED TIME PERIOD, AT THE REQUEST OF THE DEFENSE OR IN THE COURT'S DISCRETION, THE COURT SHALL ORDER ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING SANCTIONS: (A) GRANT AN APPROPRIATE EXTENSION OF TIME IN THE PROCEEDING TO ALLOW THE DEFENSE TO EXAMINE THE INFORMATION AND TO INVESTIGATE BASED ON THE LATE DELIVERED INFORMATION. FOR THAT EFFORT, THE COURT MAY AUTHORIZE FOR THE DEFENSE INVESTIGATORS, LAB TESTS, EXPERTS AND OTHER RESOURCES TO CONDUCT THE DEFENSE INVESTIGATION; (B) REOPEN A PRE-TRIAL HEARING; (C) PRECLUDE INTRODUCTION OF EVIDENCE; (D) INSTRUCT THE JURY THAT THE PROSECUTOR HAS NOT DELIVERED OR DELIV- ERED ONLY AFTER IMPROPER DELAY EVIDENCE THAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN DELIVERED AND DELIVERED TIMELY AND THAT THE JURORS MAY INFER THAT THE INFORMATION NOT DISCLOSED WAS EXCULPATORY OR, IF NOT DISCLOSED OR DISCLOSED ONLY AFTER UNDUE DELAY, COULD HAVE LED TO EXCULPATORY INFORMATION AS DEFINED IN SUBDIVISIONS ONE, TWO AND THREE OF THIS SECTION; (E) NOTIFY THE SUPERVISING PROSECUTOR; (F) REFER THE MATTER TO THE APPROPRIATE ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY COMMIT- TEE PURSUANT TO SUBDIVISION TEN OF THIS SECTION IF AFTER CONDUCTING SUCH INQUIRY AS THE COURT DEEMS APPROPRIATE AND ISSUING AN OPINION STATING THE COURT'S FINDINGS, THE ATTORNEY'S CONDUCT IS ASSERTED TO BE IMPROPER UNDER THE RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT. 10. LAWYER SANCTIONS. (A) ANY JUDICIAL OPINION WHICH CONCLUDES THAT THERE WAS AN INTENTIONAL OR RECKLESS FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS SECTION BY A PROSECUTOR SHALL BE FORWARDED BY THE CLERK OF THE COURT IN WHICH THE OPINION IS FILED TO THE ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE WITH JURIS- DICTION. (B) IF IN CONNECTION WITH THE OBLIGATION TO DELIVER INFORMATION SET OUT IN THIS SECTION OR THE STATE AND UNITED STATES CONSTITUTIONS, A TRIAL OR APPELLATE COURT HAS CONCLUDED THAT IN THE COURSE OF A CRIMINAL PROCEEDING, A PROSECUTOR HAS VIOLATED RULES 3.4(A)(1), 3.4(A)(3) OR 3.8(B) OF THE RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT, OR OTHER RELEVANT STATUTES AND RULES, BY INTENTIONALLY OR RECKLESSLY FAILING TO DELIVER OR TIMELY DELIVER TO THE DEFENSE THE INFORMATION SET OUT IN THIS SECTION, THE CONDUCT SHALL BE REFERRED BY THE JUDGE PURSUANT TO RULE 100.3(D)(2) OF THE CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT TO THE ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE APPROPRIATE JUDICIAL DISTRICT FOR PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO APPLICABLE RULES. (C) IF AN ATTORNEY HAS A REASONABLE BASIS TO BELIEVE THAT A PROSECUTOR HAS INTENTIONALLY OR RECKLESSLY FAILED TO DELIVER INFORMATION AS DEFINED IN THIS STATUTE, THAT ATTORNEY SHALL NOTIFY THE ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE APPROPRIATE JUDICIAL DISTRICT PURSUANT TO RULE 8.3(A) OF THE RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT FOR PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO COURT RULES. S. 3276 5 (D) IF MORE THAN ONE EVENT IS REFERRED TO THE ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE, THE REFERRALS SHALL BE CONSOLIDATED. 11. USE OF FALSE INFORMATION. THE PROVISIONS OF SUBDIVISION TEN OF THIS SECTION SHALL APPLY TO A PROSECUTOR FOR THE KNOWING OR RECKLESS USE OF FALSE OR UNTRUTHFUL EVIDENCE. S 2. Subdivision 1 of section 240.20 of the criminal procedure law is amended by adding a new paragraph (l) to read as follows: (L) INFORMATION RESULTING FROM COMPARING DNA TEST RESULTS ON SPECIMENS FROM CRIME SCENE SAMPLE OR SAMPLES OBTAINED IN THE COURSE OF AN INVESTI- GATION OF AN ALLEGED CRIME WITH THE DNA RECORDS MAINTAINED BY OR AVAIL- ABLE THROUGH THE STATE DNA IDENTIFICATION INDEX ESTABLISHED PURSUANT TO NEW YORK LAW OR ANY OFFICIAL FEDERAL DNA INDEX. S 3. Subdivision 1 of section 440.10 of the criminal procedure law is amended by adding a new paragraph (j) to read as follows: (J) THE PEOPLE HAVE FAILED TO PROVIDE OR TO PROVIDE IN A TIMELY MANNER EVIDENCE EXCULPATORY TO THE DEFENSE AS DEFINED IN SECTION 240.25 OF THIS CHAPTER AND HAVE FAILED TO PROVE THAT THERE WAS NO POSSIBILITY THAT THE INFORMATION WOULD HAVE AFFECTED THE DECISION. S 4. This act shall take effect on the sixtieth day after it shall have become a law.
Open Legislation comments facilitate discussion of New York State legislation. All comments are subject to moderation. Comments deemed off-topic, commercial, campaign-related, self-promotional; or that contain profanity or hate speech; or that link to sites outside of the nysenate.gov domain are not permitted, and will not be published. Comment moderation is generally performed Monday through Friday.
By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and verify you are over 13.