senate Bill S4470

2011-2012 Legislative Session

Relates to the speedy trial of certain traffic infractions

download bill text pdf

Sponsored By

Archive: Last Bill Status - In Committee


  • Introduced
  • In Committee
  • On Floor Calendar
    • Passed Senate
    • Passed Assembly
  • Delivered to Governor
  • Signed/Vetoed by Governor

do you support this bill?

Actions

view actions (2)
Assembly Actions - Lowercase
Senate Actions - UPPERCASE
Jan 04, 2012 referred to codes
Apr 06, 2011 referred to codes

S4470 - Bill Details

See Assembly Version of this Bill:
A7390
Current Committee:
Senate Codes
Law Section:
Criminal Procedure Law
Laws Affected:
Amd ยง30.30, CP L
Versions Introduced in 2009-2010 Legislative Session:
S5961, A7960

S4470 - Bill Texts

view summary

Relates to the speedy trial of certain traffic infractions.

view sponsor memo
BILL NUMBER:S4470

TITLE OF BILL:

An act
to amend the criminal procedure law, in relation to the speedy trial of
certain traffic infractions

This is one in a series of measures being introduced at the request of
the Chief Administrative Judge upon the recommendation of her
Advisory Committee on Criminal Law and Procedure.

This measure would amend the Criminal Procedure Law to authorize a
court to dismiss any traffic infraction that remains as the sole
charge in an accusatory instrument the other charges of which were
dismissed pursuant to CPL 30.30.

Traffic infractions do not fall within the offenses for which CPL
30.30 provisions apply (see People v Gonzalez, 168 Misc.2d 136 (App
Term 1st Dept 1996)). As noted in the Commentary to CPL 30.30, speedy
trial provisions do not apply to traffic infractions because CPL
30.30(1)(d) specifically applies to "offenses," and a traffic
infraction is only a "petty offense."

In practice, especially in DWI cases, a prosecutor will often charge a
defendant with misdemeanor or felony criminal charges (i.e., VTL
1192(2)) as well as a lesser included traffic infraction (VTL
1192(1)). In cases where the prosecutor fails to timely
announce readiness
on the more serious charges, and the defense files a successful 30.30
motion, however, the court is authorized to dismiss the misdemeanor or
felony counts but not the traffic infraction. Although constitutional
speedy limitations will still apply (see e.g., People v Polite, 16
Misc.3d 18 (App Term 1st Dept 2007), citing People v
Taranovich, 37 NY2d 442 (1975)), this generally permits a much
greater period of delay.
In the end, by not being able to dismiss the traffic infraction, the
case continues to languish in the criminal courts, congesting dockets
and rarely being resolved on the merits. To the extent that speedy
trial rules promote fair and efficient practice, it would be helpful
to grant courts the authority to dismiss traffic infractions at the
same time the court is compelled to dismiss all other charges in the
same accusatory instrument.

By this measure, we are not recommending a general speedy trial rule
for traffic infractions. Instead, the measure provides that where a
traffic infraction is charged in the same accusatory instrument with
other charges, at least one of which is a violation, misdemeanor or
felony, any traffic infraction will not survive longer than the
other, more serious, charges. Notably, this measure keeps in place
the current procedures for routine traffic infractions not filed as
pa11 of more serious charges in an accusatory instrument.

This measure, which would have no fiscal impact on the State, would
take effect on the first day of November next succeeding the date on


which it shall have become a law and apply to all criminal actions
whenever commenced.

2008 LEGISLATIVE HISTORY:

None. New proposal.

2009-10 LEGISLATIVE HISTORY:

Senate 5961 (Schneiderman) (Codes)
Assembly 7960 (M. of A. Perry (PASSED)

view full text
download pdf
                    S T A T E   O F   N E W   Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________

                                  4470

                       2011-2012 Regular Sessions

                            I N  S E N A T E

                              April 6, 2011
                               ___________

Introduced by Sen. NOZZOLIO -- (at request of the Office of Court Admin-
  istration)  --  read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be
  committed to the Committee on Codes

AN ACT to amend the criminal procedure law, in relation  to  the  speedy
  trial of certain traffic infractions

  THE  PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

  Section 1. Subdivision 3 of section 30.30 of  the  criminal  procedure
law is amended by adding a new paragraph (d) to read as follows:
  (D)  WHERE  A  MOTION TO DISMISS ALL OFFENSES CHARGED IN AN ACCUSATORY
INSTRUMENT MUST BE GRANTED PURSUANT TO SUBDIVISION ONE OF THIS  SECTION,
AND  SUCH ACCUSATORY INSTRUMENT CHARGES ONE OR MORE TRAFFIC INFRACTIONS,
SUCH TRAFFIC INFRACTION OR INFRACTIONS SHALL ALSO BE DISMISSED.
  S 2. This act shall take effect on the first of November next succeed-
ing the date on which it shall have become a law,  and  shall  apply  to
criminal actions commenced after such effective date.






 EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                      [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                           LBD09807-01-1

Comments

Open Legislation comments facilitate discussion of New York State legislation. All comments are subject to moderation. Comments deemed off-topic, commercial, campaign-related, self-promotional; or that contain profanity or hate speech; or that link to sites outside of the nysenate.gov domain are not permitted, and will not be published. Comment moderation is generally performed Monday through Friday.

By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and verify you are over 13.