senate Bill S7493A

Signed By Governor
2011-2012 Legislative Session

Relates to the federal electronic fund transfer act

download bill text pdf

Sponsored By

Archive: Last Bill Status Via A10591 - Signed by Governor


  • Introduced
  • In Committee
  • On Floor Calendar
    • Passed Senate
    • Passed Assembly
  • Delivered to Governor
  • Signed by Governor

do you support this bill?

Actions

view actions (12)
Assembly Actions - Lowercase
Senate Actions - UPPERCASE
Aug 17, 2012 signed chap.399
Aug 06, 2012 delivered to governor
Jun 19, 2012 returned to assembly
passed senate
3rd reading cal.1372
substituted for s7493a
Jun 19, 2012 substituted by a10591
ordered to third reading cal.1372
committee discharged and committed to rules
Jun 12, 2012 print number 7493a
amend (t) and recommit to judiciary
May 29, 2012 referred to judiciary

Votes

view votes

Bill Amendments

Original
A (Active)
Original
A (Active)

Co-Sponsors

S7493 - Bill Details

See Assembly Version of this Bill:
A10591
Law Section:
Uniform Commercial Code
Laws Affected:
Amd §4-A-108, UCC
Versions Introduced in 2011-2012 Legislative Session:
A10591

S7493 - Bill Texts

view summary

Relates to the federal electronic fund transfer act; clarifies the relationship between such act and article 4-A of the UCC.

view sponsor memo
BILL NUMBER:S7493

TITLE OF BILL:
An act
to amend the uniform commercial code, in relation to clarifying the
relationship between article four-A of the code and
the federal Electronic
Fund Transfer Act and to clarify article four-A's applicability to
remittance transfers under the Electronic Fund Transfer Act

PURPOSE:
To amend section 4-A-108 of the Uniform Commercial Code to clarify the
relationship between Article 4A of the code and the federal
Electronic Fund Transfer Act ("EFT Act") and to clarify Article 4A's
applicability to remittance transfers under the EFT Act. This bill
will maintain all consumer protections afforded under federal and
state statutes.

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS:
The bill would amend section 4-A-108 from the state Uniform Commercial
Code effective upon enactment.

Subdivision (1) keeps the current section 4-A-108 but makes the
application of the general rule subject to an exception as set out in
subdivision (2). Subdivision (2) provide that Article 4A applies to a
"remittance transfer" as defined in the EFT Act unless that
remittance transfer is also an "electronic fund transfer" as defined
in the EFT Act. Subdivision (3) makes it clear that that the
protections afforded consumers who send "remittance transfers" are
preserved by stating that if there is an inconsistency between an
applicable provision of Article 4A and an applicable provision of the
EFT Act, the EFT Act will govern.

JUSTIFICATION:
Article 4A was designed to provide a set of rules to
govern wholesale wire transfers-high-value commercial payments
normally made exclusively by businesses firms.(1) Article 4A was not
intended to be a consumer-protection statue; consumers were already
protected by the federal EFT Act, which covers a wide variety of
electronic payments used by
consumers.(2) In order to ensure that there could be no confusion,
section 4-A-108 excluded from Article 4A's coverage any funds
transfer governed by the EFT Act.

The EFT Act, in turn, excluded from its definition of "electronic fund
transfer" any transfer of funds, other than those processed by
automated clearinghouse, made by a financial institution on behalf of
a consumer by means of a service that transfers funds held at either
Federal Reserve banks or other depository institutions and which is
not designed primarily to transfer funds on behalf of a consumer.(3)

The effect of section 4-A-108 was to make Article 4A and the EFT Act
"mutually exclusive,"(4) and it meant that funds transfers sent
through wholesale funds-transfer networks, such as the Federal
Reserve Banks' Fedwire funds-transfer service and the Clearing House
Interbank Payments System ("CHIPS")(5) would be governed by Article 4A
even if they involved consumers.

This balance was changed when Congress enacted the Dodd-Frank Wall
Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act ("Dodd-Frank Act,).(6)
Section 1073 of the Dodd-Frank Act amended the EFT Act to provide
protections for senders of "remittance transfers," which are defined
to include any electronic transfer of funds from a consumer in the
U.S. to a recipient located in a foreign county regardless of whether
the transfer is technically an "electronic fund transfer" under the
EFT Act.(7) These consumer protections include disclosure requirements
regarding the amount that the recipient will receive, the fees
charged for the remittance transfer, the exchange rate (if the
recipient is to receive funds in a different currency), and the
promised delivery date;(8) section 1073 also provides procedures for
the resolution of disputes.(9) Rules implementing section 1073 have
been adopted by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ("CFPB") and
take effect in February 2013.(10) The effect of section 1073 was to
include in the EFT Act a certain class of funds transfers, even if
such transfers are sent through a wholesale funds-transfer network
like CHIPS or Fedwire, and thus by operation of U.C.C. § 4-A-108 to
exclude those funds transfers from Article 4A.

This creates a problem for operators and users of wholesale
funds-transfer networks. While the originator of a remittance
transfer is given certain protections under section 1073, there is no
longer any law to govern the relations between the banks that will
necessarily be part of the payments chain-no law to govern the
relationship of the originator's bank and an intermediary bank or the
beneficiary's bank. While a court might in the case of a dispute
"apply appropriate principles from Article 4A by analogy,"(11) it is
not clear that this will always be the case.

Faced with this legal uncertainty, the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System has adopted an amendment to its Regulation J,
which governs funds transfers by the Federal Reserve Banks to clarify
that "Regulation J continues to apply to a Fedwire funds transfer
even if the funds transfer also meets the definition of 'remittance
transfer under the Electronic Fund Transfer Act."(12) While this
works for Fedwire, private-sector systems do not have the ability to
issue federal regulations that have the effect of overriding
conflicting provisions of state law. Thus, private-sector systems are
left in the position of having to process some payments for which it
is not clear which legal principles apply.(13)

The CFPB is very aware of this problem and understands that there is no
conflict between the consumer-protection provisions of section 1073
and the interbank-liability rules of Article 4A.

Nevertheless, it declined to issue a rule that would have adopted
Article 4A to govern the aspects of remittance transfers that do not
affect consumers while incorporating the consumer-protection
provision of section 1073; the CFPB stated its belief that "the best
mechanisms for resolving this uncertainty rests with the states,
which can amend their respective versions of UCC Article
4A,..."(14)

The bill would amend New York's Article 4A to (i) continue the
traditional exemption from Article 4A electronic funds transfers as
defined in the federal EFT Act, but (ii) provide that remittance
transfers under section 1073 would not be excluded from Article 4A
unless they are also electronic fund transfers under the EFT Act.
Importantly, the consumer protections afforded
under section 1073 of the Dodd-Frank Act would not he impaired by this
bill. The Consumer who sends a remittance transfer would still have
the full set of protections with respect to the institution directly
providing the remittance-transfer service. This bill would simply be
analogous 10 the recently amended Federal Reserve Regulation J
providing the same legal protections to users and operators of
private-sector funds-transfer systems.

Subdivision (3) of the bill explicitly recognizes the operation of the
Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution would ensure that the
protections that Congress has accorded to U.S.
consumers who initiate remittance transfers will be unaffected by New
York's change to Article 4A.

This amendment has been drafted in coordination and support from the
National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws ("ULC")
and the American Law Institute ("ALI"), the Sponsors of the Uniform
Commercial Code, and with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
The staff of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System has
also been consulted in the drafting process.

OFFICIAL COMMENTS: The ULC and ALI supply each section of the UCC with
an Official Comment to explain the provision and give examples of how
it would operate. Although the New York legislature does not adopt
these comments as part of the New York DCC, members of the Senate and
Assembly may find the new Official Comment for 4-A-108 useful in
understanding the revision to this section. The Official Comment is
attached as Annex A.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY:
New.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
None.

EFFECTIVE DATE:
Immediate.

FOOTNOTES:

(1) See U.C.C. § 4A-102, cmt.

(2) See U.C.C. § 4A-108, cmt.

(3) 15 U.S.C. § 1693a(6)(b). The automated clearinghouse ("ACH") is a
funds-transfer system that is often used to make consumer credit and
debit payments, such as direct deposit of payroll or direct debits
for mortgage or insurance payments.

(4) U.C.C. § 4A-108, cmt.

(5) CHIPS is owned and operated by The Clearing House Payments Company
L.L.C., which is headquartered and has its primary operations center
in New York.

(6) Pub. L. No.111-203, 124 Stat. 1376 (Jul. 21,2010).

(7) 15 US.C. § 1693o-1(g).

(8) Id. § 1693o-1(a).

(9) Id. § 1693o-1(d).

(10) 77 Fed. Reg. 6194 (Feb. 7,2012).

(11) U.C.C. § 4A-108, cmt.

(12) 77 Fed. Reg. 21,845 (Apr. 12, 2012). Regulation] adopts Article 4A
as the law governing Fedwire funds transfers. 12 C.F.R § 210.25(b)(1).

(13) While private-sector systems may amend their rules to provide that
Article 4A's principles will continue to govern all of their
transactions, it is not clear how effective such rules would be.
CHIPS has amended its rules to provide that as between the banks that
send and receive CHIPS payment messages, the Article 4A rules
continue to apply.

(14) 77 Fed Reg. at 6212.

ANNEX A

Official Comment

1. The Electronic Fund Transfer Act (EFTA), implemented by Regulation
E, 12 C.F.R. Part 1005, is a federal statute that covers aspects of
electronic fund transfers involving consumers. EFTA also governs
remittance transfers, defined in 1.5 D.S.C. Sec.
1693o-1, which involve transfers of funds through electronic means by
consumers to recipients in another country through persons or
financial institutions that provide such transfers in the normal
course of their business. Not all "remittance transfers" as defined
in EFTA, however, qualify as "electronic fund transfers" as defined
under the EFTA, 15 D.S.C. Sec. 1693a(7). While Section 4A-108(a)
broadly states that Article 4A does not apply to any funds transfer
that is governed in any part by EFTA, subsection (b) provides an
exception. The purpose of Section 4A-108(b) is to allow this
Article to apply to a funds transfer as defined in Section 4A-104(a)
that also is a remittance transfer as defined in EFTA, so long
as that remittance transfer is not an electronic fund transfer as
defined in EFTA. If the resulting application of this Article to an
EFTA-defined "remittance transfer" that is not an EFTA-defined
"electronic fund transfer" creates an inconsistency between an
applicable provision of this Article and an applicable provision of
EFT A, the provision of EFTA governs to the extent of the
inconsistency. Section 4A-108(c).

2. The following examples are not exhaustive, but illustrate the
relationship between EFTA and this Article pursuant to Section
4A-108.

Example 1. A commercial customer of Bank A sends a payment order to
Bank A, instructing Bank A to transfer funds from its account at Bank
A to the account of a consumer at Bank B. The funds transfer is
executed by a payment order from Bank A to an intermediary bank and
is executed by the intermediary bank by means of a clearinghouse
credit entry to the consumer's account at Bank B (the beneficiary's
bank), The transfer into the consumer's account is an electronic fund
transfer as defined in 15 D.S.C. Sec. 1693a(7). Pursuant to Section
4A-108(a), Article 4A does not apply to any part of the funds
transfer because EFTA governs part of the funds transfer. The funds
transfer is not a remittance transfer as defined in 15 D.S.C. Sec.
16930-1 because the originator is a not a consumer customer. Thus
Section 4A-108(b) does not apply.

A court might, however, apply appropriate principles from Article 4A
by analogy in analyzing any part of the funds transfer that is not
subject to the provisions of EFTA or other law, such as the
obligation of the intermediary bank to execute the payment order of
the originator's bank.

Example 2. A consumer originates a payment order that is a remittance
transfer as defined in 15 D.S.C. Sec. 1693o-1 by providing the
remittance transfer provider (Bank A) with cash in the amount of the
transfer plus any relevant fees. The fund transfer is routed through
an intermediary bank for final credit to the designated recipient's
account at Bank B. Bank A's payment order identifies the designated
recipient by both name and account number in Bank B, but the name and
number provided identify different persons.
This funds transfer is not an electronic fund transfer as defined in
15 D.S.C. Sec.
1693a(7) because it is not initiated by electronic means and is not
from a consumer's account. Both Article 4A and EFTA apply to the
funds transfer. Section 4A-108(a), (b).
Article 4A's provision on mistakes in identifying the designated
beneficiary, Section 4A-207, would apply as long as not inconsistent
with the governing EFTA provisions.
Section 4A-108(c).

Example 3. A consumer Originates a payment order from the consumer's
account at Bank A to the designated recipient's account at Bank B
located outside the United States. Bank A uses the CHIPS system to
execute that payment order. The funds transfer is a remittance
transfer as defined in 15 U.S.C. Sec. 16930-1. This transfer is not
an electronic fund transfer as defined in 15 U.S.c. Sec. 1693a(7)
because of the exclusion for such types of transfers in 15 U.S.C.
Sec. 1693a(7)(B). Under Section 4A-108(b), both Article 4A and EFTA
apply to the funds transfer and EFTA, as federal law , will prevail
to the extent of any inconsistency between EFTA and Article 4A.
Section 4A-108(c). For example, suppose the consumer subsequently
exercised the right to cancel the remittance transfer under the right
given under EFTA and obtain a refund. Bank A would be required to
comply with the EFTA rule concerning cancellation even if Article 4A
prevents Bank A from cancelling or reversing its payment order it
sent to its receiving bank. Section 4A-211.

Example 4. A person fraudulently originates an unauthorized payment
order from a consumer's account through use of an online banking
interface. This transaction is an electronic fund transfer as defined
in 15 U.S.C. Sec. 1693a(7) and would be governed by EFTA and not
Article 4A. Section 4A-108(a). Whether the funds transfer also
qualifies as a remittance transfer under 15 U.S.C. Sec. 16930-1 does
not matter to the application of Article 4A.

Example 5. A person fraudulently originates an unauthorized payment
order from a consumer's account at Bank A through forging written
documents that are provided in person to an employee of Bank A. This
funds transfer is not an electronic fund transfer as defined in 15
U.S.C. Sec. 1693a(7) because the fund transfer is not initiated by
electronic means. Article 4A will apply to this funds transfer
regardless of whether the funds transfer also qualifies as a
remittance transfer under 15 U.S.C. Sec.
1693o-1. If the funds transfer is not a remittance transfer, the

provisions of Section 4A-108 are not implicated because the funds
transfer does not fall under EFTA, and the general scope provision
of Article 4A governs. Section 4A-102. If the funds transfer is a
remittance transfer, and thus governed by EFTA, Section 4A-108(b)
provides that Article 4A also applies.

3. Regulation J, 12 C.F.R. Part 210, of the Federal Reserve Board
addresses the application of that regulation and EFTA to fund
transfers made through Fedwire.
Fedwire transfers are further described in Official Comments 1 and 2
to Section 4A-107.
In addition, funds transfer system rules may be applicable pursuant to
Section 4A-501.

view full text
download pdf
                    S T A T E   O F   N E W   Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________

                                  7493

                            I N  S E N A T E

                              May 29, 2012
                               ___________

Introduced  by  Sens.  GRIFFO, FARLEY -- read twice and ordered printed,
  and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Judiciary

AN ACT to amend the uniform commercial code, in relation  to  clarifying
  the  relationship  between  article four-A of the code and the federal
  Electronic Fund Transfer Act and to clarify article four-A's  applica-
  bility to remittance transfers under the Electronic Fund Transfer Act

  THE  PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

  Section 4-A-108 of the uniform commercial code, as  added  by  chapter
208 of the laws of 1990, is amended to read as follows:
Section 4-A-108. [Exclusion of Consumer Transactions Governed by Federal
                   Law] RELATIONSHIP TO ELECTRONIC FUND TRANSFER ACT.
  [This] (1) EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN SUBDIVISION (2) OF THIS SECTION, THIS
Article does not apply to a funds transfer any part of which is governed
by  the  Electronic  Fund  Transfer  Act  of  1978 (Title XX, Public Law
95-630, 92 Stat. 3728, 15 U.S.C. S1693 et seq.) as amended from time  to
time.
  (2)  THIS ARTICLE SHALL APPLY TO A FUNDS TRANSFER THAT IS A REMITTANCE
TRANSFER AS DEFINED IN THE ELECTRONIC FUND TRANSFER ACT (15 U.S.C.  SEC.
1693O-1)  AS AMENDED FROM TIME TO TIME UNLESS THE REMITTANCE TRANSFER IS
AN ELECTRONIC FUND TRANSFER AS DEFINED IN THE ELECTRONIC  FUND  TRANSFER
ACT (15 U.S.C. SEC. 1693A) AS AMENDED FROM TIME TO TIME.
  (3) IN A FUNDS TRANSFER TO WHICH THIS ARTICLE APPLIES, IN THE EVENT OF
AN  INCONSISTENCY BETWEEN AN APPLICABLE PROVISION OF THIS ARTICLE AND AN
APPLICABLE PROVISION OF THE ELECTRONIC FUND TRANSFER ACT, THE  PROVISION
OF  THE ELECTRONIC FUND TRANSFER ACT GOVERNS TO THE EXTENT OF THE INCON-
SISTENCY.
  S 2. This act shall take effect immediately.



 EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                      [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                           LBD15751-01-2

Co-Sponsors

S7493A (ACTIVE) - Bill Details

See Assembly Version of this Bill:
A10591
Law Section:
Uniform Commercial Code
Laws Affected:
Amd §4-A-108, UCC
Versions Introduced in 2011-2012 Legislative Session:
A10591

S7493A (ACTIVE) - Bill Texts

view summary

Relates to the federal electronic fund transfer act; clarifies the relationship between such act and article 4-A of the UCC.

view sponsor memo
BILL NUMBER:S7493A

TITLE OF BILL:
An act to amend the uniform commercial code, in relation to clarifying
the relationship between article 4-A of the code and the federal
Electronic Fund Transfer Act and to clarify such article's
applicability to remittance transfers under the Electronic Fund
Transfer Act

PURPOSE:
To amend section 4-A-108 of the Uniform Commercial Code to clarify the
relationship between Article 4A of the code and the federal Electronic
Fund Transfer Act ("EFT Act") and to clarify Article 4A's
applicability to remittance transfers under the EFT Act. This bill
will maintain all consumer protections afforded under federal and
state statutes.

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS:
The bill would amend section 4-A-108 from the state Uniform Commercial
Code effective upon enactment.

Subdivision (1) keeps the current section 4-A-108 but makes the
application of the general rule subject to an exception as set out in
subdivision (2). Subdivision (2) provide that Article 4A applies to a
"remittance transfer" as defined in the EFT Act unless that remittance
transfer is also an "electronic fund transfer" as defined in the EFT
Act. Subdivision (3) makes it clear that that the protections afforded
consumers who send "remittance transfers" are preserved by stating
that if there is an inconsistency between an applicable provision of
Article 4A and an applicable provision of the EFT Act, the EFT Act
will govern.

JUSTIFICATION:
Article 4A was designed to provide a set of rules to govern wholesale
wire transfers-high-value commercial payments normally made
exclusively by businesses firms.(1) Article 4A was not intended to be
a consumer-protection statue; consumers were already protected by the
federal EFT Act, which covers a wide variety of electronic payments
used by consumers.(2) In order to ensure that there could be no
confusion, section 4-A-108 excluded from Article 4A's coverage any
funds transfer governed by the EFT Act.

The EFT Act, in turn, excluded from its definition of "electronic fund
transfer" any transfer of funds, other than those processed by
automated clearinghouse, made by a financial institution on behalf of
a consumer by means of a service that transfers funds held at either
Federal Reserve banks or other depository institutions and which is
not designed primarily to transfer funds on behalf of a consumer.(3)

The effect of section 4-A-108 was to make Article 4A and the EFT Act
"mutually exclusive,"(4) and it meant that funds transfers sent
through wholesale funds-transfer networks, such as the Federal Reserve
Banks' Fedwire funds-transfer service and the Clearing House Interbank
Payments System ("CHIPS")(5) would be governed by Article 4A even if
they involved consumers.


This balance was changed when Congress enacted the Dodd-Frank Wall
Street Refonn and Consumer Protection Act ("Dodd-Frank Act").(6)
Section 1073 of the Dodd-Frank Act amended the EFT Act to provide
protections for senders of "remittance transfers," which are defined
to include any electronic transfer of funds from a consumer in the
U.S. to a recipient located in a foreign county regardless of whether
the transfer is technically an "electronic fund transfer" under the
EFT Act.(7) These consumer protections include disclosure requirements
regarding the amount that the recipient will receive, the fees charged
for the remittance transfer, the exchange rate (if the recipient is to
receive funds in a different currency), and the promised delivery
date;(8) section 1073 also provides procedures for the resolution of
disputes.(9) Rules implementing section 1073 have been adopted by the
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ("CFPB") and take effect in
February 2013.(10) The effect of section 1073 was to include in the
EFT Act a certain class of funds transfers, even if such transfers are
sent through a wholesale funds-transfer network like CHIPS or Fedwire,
and thus by operation of U.C.C. § 4-A-108 to exclude those funds
transfers from Article 4A.

This creates a problem for operators and users of wholesale
funds-transfer networks. While the originator of a remittance transfer
is given certain protections under section 1073, there is no longer
any law to govern the relations between the banks that will
necessarily be part of the payments chain-no law to govern the
relationship of the originator's bank and an intermediary bank or the
beneficiary's bank. While a court might in the case of a dispute
"apply appropriate principles from Article 4A by analogy,"(11) it is
not clear that this will always be the case.

Faced with this legal uncertainty, the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System has adopted an amendment to its Regulation J,
which governs funds transfers by the Federal Reserve Banks to clarify
that "Regulation J continues to apply to a Fedwire funds transfer even
if the funds transfer also meets the definition of 'remittance
transfer under the Electronic Fund Transfer Act..."(12) While this
works for Fedwire, private-sector systems do not have the ability to
issue federal regulations that have the effect of overriding
conflicting provisions of state law. Thus, private-sector systems are
left in the position of having to process some payments for which it
is not clear which legal principles apply.(13).

The CFPB is very aware of this problem and understands that there is
no conflict between the consumer-protection provisions of section 1073
and the interbank-liability rules of Article 4A. Nevertheless, it
declined to issue a rule that would have adopted Article 4A to govern
the aspects of remittance transfers that do not affect consumers while
incorporating the consumer-protection provision of section 1073; the
CFPB stated its belief that "the best mechanisms for resolving this
uncertainty rests with the states, which can amend their respective
versions of UCC Article 4A,..."(14)

The bill would amend New York's Article 4A to (i) continue the
traditional exemption from Article 4A electronic funds transfers as
defined in the federal EFT Act, but (ii) provide that remittance
transfers under section 1073 would not be excluded from Article 4A
unless they are also electronic fund transfers under the EFT Act.


Importantly, the consumer protections afforded under section 1073 of
the Dodd-Frank Act would not be impaired by this bill. The consumer
who sends a remittance transfer would still have the full set of
protections with respect to the institution directly providing the
remittance-transfer service. This bill would simply be analogous to
the recently amended Federal Reserve Regulation J providing the same
legal protections to users and operators of private-sector
funds-transfer systems.

Subdivision (3) of the bill explicitly recognizes the operation of the
Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution would ensure that the
protections that Congress has accorded to U.S. consumers who initiate
remittance transfers will be unaffected by New York's change to
Article 4A.

This amendment has been drafted in coordination and support from the
National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws ("ULC") and
the American Law Institute ("ALI"), the sponsors of the Uniform
Commercial Code, and with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. The
staff of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System has also
been consulted in the drafting process.

OFFICIAL COMMENTS: The ULC and ALI supply each section of the UCC with
an Official Comment to explain the provision and give examples of how
it would operate. Although the New York legislature does not adopt
these comments as part of the New York UCC, members of the Senate and
Assembly may find the new Official Comment for 4-A-108 useful in
understanding the revision to this section. The Official Comment is
attached as Annex A.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY:
New.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
None.

EFFECTIVE DATE:
Immediate.

FOOTNOTES:

(1) See U.C.C. § 4A-102, cmt.

(2) See U.C.C. § 4A-108, cmt

(3) 15 U.S.C. § 1693a(6)(b). The automated clearinghouse ("ACH") is a
funds-transfer system that is often used to make consumer credit
and
debit payments, such as direct deposit of payroll or direct debits
for mortgage or insurance payments.

(4) U.C.C. § 4A-108, cmt.

(5) CHIPS is owned and operated by The Clearing House Payments Company
L.L.C., which is headquartered and has its primary operations
center


in New York.

(6) Pub. L. No. 111-203, 124 Stat. 1376 (Jul. 21, 2010).

(7) 15 U.S.C. § 16930-1(g).

(8) Id. § 16930-1(a).

(9) Id. § 16930-1(d).

(10) 77 Fed Reg. 6194 (Feb. 7, 2012).

(11) U.C.C. § 4A-108, cmt

(12) 77 Fed. Reg. 21,845 (Apr. 12, 2012). Regulation J adopts Article
4A
as the law governing Fedwire funds transfers. 12 C.F.R.
§ 210.25(b)(1).

(13) While private-sector systems may amend their rules to provide
that
Article 4A's principles will continue to govern all of their
transactions, it is not clear how effective such rules would be.
CHIPS has amended its rules to provide that as between the banks
that send and receive CHIPS payment messages, the Article 4A
rules
continue to apply.

(14) 77 Fed Reg. at 6212.


ANNEX A

OFFICIAL COMMENT

1. The Electronic Fund Transfer Act (EFTA), implemented by Regulation
E, 12 C.F.R. Part 1005, is a federal statute that covers aspects of
electronic fund transfers involving consumers. EFTA also governs
remittance transfers, defined in 15 D.S.C. Sec. 16930-1, which
involve transfers of funds through electronic means by consumers to
recipients in another country through persons or financial
institutions that provide such transfers in the normal course of their
business. Not all "remittance transfers" as defined in EFTA, however,
qualify as "electronic fund transfers" as defined under the EFTA, 15
D.S.C. Sec. 1693a(7). While Section 4A-108(a) broadly states that
Article 4A does not apply to any funds transfer that is governed in
any part by EFTA, subsection (b) provides an exception. The purpose of
Section 4A-I08(b) is to allow this Article to apply to a funds
transfer as defined in Section 4A-104(a) that also is a remittance
transfer as defined in EFTA, so long as that remittance transfer is
not an electronic fund transfer as defined in EFTA. If the resulting
application of this Article to an EFTA-defined "remittance transfer"
that is not an EFTA-defined "electronic fund transfer" creates an
inconsistency between an applicable provision of this Article and an
applicable provision of EFTA, the provision of EFTA governs to the
extent of the inconsistency. Section 4A-108(c).

2. The following examples are not exhaustive, but illustrate the
relationship between EFTA and this Article pursuant to Section 4A-108.

Example 1. A commercial customer of Bank A sends a payment order to
Bank A, instructing Bank A to transfer funds from its account at Bank
A to the account of a consumer at Bank B. The funds transfer is
executed by a payment order from Bank A to an intermediary bank and is
executed by the intermediary bank by means of a clearinghouse credit
entry to the consumer's account at Bank B (the beneficiary's bank).
The transfer into the consumer's account is an electronic fund
transfer as defined in 15 U.S.C. Sec. 1693a(7). Pursuant to Section
4A-108(a), Article 4A does not apply to any part of the funds transfer
because EFTA governs part of the funds transfer. The funds transfer is
not a remittance transfer as defined in 15 D.S.C. Sec. 16930-1
because the Originator is a not a consumer customer. Thus Section
4A-108(b) does not apply.

A court might, however, apply appropriate principles from Article 4A
by analogy in analyzing any part of the funds transfer that is not
subject to the provisions of EFTA or other law, such as the obligation
of the intermediary bank to execute the payment order of the
originator's bank.

Example 2. A consumer originates a payment order that is a remittance
transfer as defined in 15 D.S.C. Sec. 16930-1 by providing the
remittance transfer provider (Bank A) with cash in the amount of the
transfer plus any relevant fees. The fund transfer is routed through
an intermediary bank for final credit to the designated recipient's
account at Bank B. Bank A's payment order identifies the designated
recipient by both name and account number in Bank B, but the name and
number provided identify different persons. This funds transfer is


not an electronic fund transfer as defined in 15 U.S.C. Sec. 1693a(7)
because it is not initiated by electronic means and is not from a
consumer's account. Both Article 4A and EFTA apply to the funds
transfer. Section 4A-108(a), (b). Article 4A's provision on mistakes
in identifying the designated beneficiary, Section 4A207, would apply
as long as not inconsistent with the governing EFTA provisions.
Section 4A-108(c).

Example 3. A consumer originates a payment order from the consumer's
account at Bank A to the designated recipient's account at Bank B
located outside the United States. Bank A uses the CHIPS system to
execute that payment order. The funds transfer is a remittance
transfer as defined in 15 U.S.C. Sec. 16930-1. This transfer is not an
electronic fund transfer as defined in 15 U.S.C. Sec. 1693a(7) because
of the exclusion for such types of transfers in 15 U.S.C. Sec.
1693a(7)(B). Under Section 4A-108(b), both Article 4A and EFTA apply
to the funds transfer and EFTA, as federal law, will prevail to the
extent of any inconsistency between EFTA and Article 4A. Section
4A-108(c). For example, Suppose the consumer subsequently exercised
the right to cancel the remittance transfer under the light given
under EFTA and obtain a refund. Bank A would be required to comply
with the EFTA rule concerning cancellation even if Article 4A prevents
Bank A from cancelling or reversing its payment order it sent to its
receiving bank. Section 4A-211.

Example 4. A person fraudulently originates an unauthorized payment
order from a consumer's account through use of an online banking
interface. This transaction is an electronic fund transfer as defined
in 15 U.S.C. Sec. 1693a(7) and would be governed by EFTA and not
Article 4A. Section 4A-108(a). Whether the funds transfer also
qualifies as a remittance transfer under 15 U.S.C. Sec. 169.30-1 does
not matter to the application of Article 4A.

Example 5. A person fraudulently originates an unauthorized payment
order from a consumer's account at Bank A through forging written
documents that are provided in person to an employee of Bank A. This
funds transfer is not an electronic fund transfer as defined in 15
U.S.C. Sec. 1693a(7) because the fund transfer is not initiated by
electronic means. Article 4A will apply to this funds transfer
regardless of whether the funds transfer also qualifies as a
remittance transfer under 15 U.S.C. Sec. 169.30-1. If the funds
transfer is not a remittance transfer, the provisions of Section 4A108
are not implicated because the funds transfer does not fall under
EFTA, and the general scope provision of Article 4A governs. Section
4A-102. If the funds transfer is a remittance transfer, and thus
governed by EFTA, Section 4A-108(b) provides that Article 4A also
applies.

3. Regulation J, 12 C.F.R. Part 210, of the Federal Reserve Board
addresses the application of that regulation and EFTA to fund
transfers made through Fedwire. Fedwire transfers are further
described in Official Comments 1 and 2 to Section 4A-107. In
addition, funds transfer system rules may be applicable pursuant to
Section 4A-501.


view full text
download pdf
                    S T A T E   O F   N E W   Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________

                                 7493--A

                            I N  S E N A T E

                              May 29, 2012
                               ___________

Introduced  by  Sens.  GRIFFO, FARLEY -- read twice and ordered printed,
  and when printed to be committed to  the  Committee  on  Judiciary  --
  committee  discharged,  bill amended, ordered reprinted as amended and
  recommitted to said committee

AN ACT to amend the uniform commercial code, in relation  to  clarifying
  the relationship between article 4-A of the code and the federal Elec-
  tronic  Fund  Transfer Act and to clarify such article's applicability
  to remittance transfers under the Electronic Fund Transfer Act

  THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND  ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

  Section 1. Section 4-A-108 of the uniform commercial code, as added by
chapter 208 of the laws of 1990, is amended to read as follows:
Section 4-A-108. [Exclusion of Consumer Transactions Governed by Federal
                   Law] RELATIONSHIP TO ELECTRONIC FUND TRANSFER ACT.
  [This]  (1) EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN SUBSECTION (2) OF THIS SECTION, THIS
Article does not apply to a funds transfer any part of which is governed
by the Electronic Fund Transfer  Act  of  1978  (Title  XX,  Public  Law
95-630,  92 Stat. 3728, 15 U.S.C. S1693 et seq.) as amended from time to
time.
  (2) THIS ARTICLE SHALL APPLY TO A FUNDS TRANSFER THAT IS A  REMITTANCE
TRANSFER  AS DEFINED IN THE ELECTRONIC FUND TRANSFER ACT (15 U.S.C. SEC.
1693O-1) AS AMENDED FROM TIME TO TIME UNLESS THE REMITTANCE TRANSFER  IS
AN  ELECTRONIC  FUND TRANSFER AS DEFINED IN THE ELECTRONIC FUND TRANSFER
ACT (15 U.S.C. SEC. 1693A) AS AMENDED FROM TIME TO TIME.
  (3) IN A FUNDS TRANSFER TO WHICH THIS ARTICLE APPLIES, IN THE EVENT OF
AN INCONSISTENCY BETWEEN AN APPLICABLE PROVISION OF THIS ARTICLE AND  AN
APPLICABLE  PROVISION OF THE ELECTRONIC FUND TRANSFER ACT, THE PROVISION
OF THE ELECTRONIC FUND TRANSFER ACT GOVERNS TO THE EXTENT OF THE  INCON-
SISTENCY.
  S 2. This act shall take effect immediately.


 EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                      [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                           LBD15751-02-2

Comments

Open Legislation comments facilitate discussion of New York State legislation. All comments are subject to moderation. Comments deemed off-topic, commercial, campaign-related, self-promotional; or that contain profanity or hate speech; or that link to sites outside of the nysenate.gov domain are not permitted, and will not be published. Comment moderation is generally performed Monday through Friday.

By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and verify you are over 13.