S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________
414
2013-2014 Regular Sessions
I N S E N A T E
(PREFILED)
January 9, 2013
___________
Introduced by Sen. DILAN -- read twice and ordered printed, and when
printed to be committed to the Committee on Corporations, Authorities
and Commissions
AN ACT to amend the public authorities law, in relation to requiring
public authorities and public benefit corporations to negotiate with
professional firms providing architectural or engineering services in
order from the most qualified to the least qualified with regard to
the provision of services to the authority or corporation
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Subparagraph (iv) of paragraph (b) of subdivision 3 of
section 2879 of the public authorities law, as amended by chapter 383 of
the laws of 1994, is amended to read as follows:
(iv) as used in this subparagraph, the term "professional firm" shall
be defined as any individual or sole proprietorship, partnership, corpo-
ration, association, or other legal entity permitted by law to practice
the professions of architecture, engineering or surveying.
IT IS THE POLICY OF NEW YORK STATE TO NEGOTIATE CONTRACTS FOR ARCHI-
TECTURAL AND/OR ENGINEERING SERVICES AND/OR SURVEYING SERVICES ON THE
BASIS OF DEMONSTRATED COMPETENCE AND QUALIFICATION FOR THE TYPE OF
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REQUIRED AND AT FAIR AND REASONABLE FEES.
IN THE PROCUREMENT OF ARCHITECTURAL, ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING
SERVICES, THE CORPORATION SHALL ENCOURAGE PROFESSIONAL FIRMS ENGAGED IN
THE LAWFUL PRACTICE OF THE PROFESSION TO SUBMIT AN ANNUAL STATEMENT OF
QUALIFICATIONS AND PERFORMANCE DATA. THE CORPORATION FOR EACH PROPOSED
PROJECT SHALL EVALUATE CURRENT STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS AND PERFORM-
ANCE DATA ON FILE WITH THE CORPORATION. IF DESIRED, THE CORPORATION MAY
CONDUCT DISCUSSIONS WITH THREE OR MORE PROFESSIONAL FIRMS REGARDING
ANTICIPATED DESIGN CONCEPTS AND PROPOSED METHODS OF APPROACH TO THE
ASSIGNMENT. THE CORPORATION SHALL SELECT, IN ORDER OF PREFERENCE, BASED
EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD00703-01-3
S. 414 2
UPON CRITERIA ESTABLISHED BY THE CORPORATION, NO LESS THAN THREE PROFES-
SIONAL FIRMS DEEMED TO BE THE MOST HIGHLY QUALIFIED TO PROVIDE THE
SERVICES REQUIRED.
EVERY CORPORATION SHALL NEGOTIATE A CONTRACT WITH THE HIGHEST QUALI-
FIED PROFESSIONAL FIRM FOR ARCHITECTURAL AND/OR ENGINEERING SERVICES
AND/OR SURVEYING SERVICES AT COMPENSATION WHICH THE CORPORATION DETER-
MINES IN WRITING TO BE FAIR AND REASONABLE TO SUCH CORPORATION. IN
MAKING THIS DECISION, THE CORPORATION SHALL TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE ESTI-
MATED VALUE OF THE SERVICES TO BE RENDERED, INCLUDING THE COSTS, THE
SCOPE, COMPLEXITY AND PROFESSIONAL NATURE THEREOF.
The corporation shall not refuse to negotiate with a professional firm
solely because the ratio of the "allowable indirect costs" to direct
labor costs of the professional firm or the hourly labor rate in any
labor category of the professional firm exceeds a limitation generally
set by the corporation in the determination of the reasonableness of the
estimated cost of services to be rendered by the professional firm, but
rather the corporation should also consider the reasonableness of cost
based on the total estimated cost of the service of the professional
firm which should include, among other things, all the direct labor
costs of the professional firm for such services plus all "allowable
indirect costs," other direct costs, and negotiated profit of the
professional firm. "Allowable indirect costs" of a professional firm are
defined as those costs generally associated with overhead which cannot
be specifically identified with a single project or contract and are
considered reasonable and allowable under specific state contract or
allowability limits. SHOULD THE CORPORATION BE UNABLE TO NEGOTIATE A
SATISFACTORY CONTRACT WITH THE PROFESSIONAL FIRM CONSIDERED TO BE THE
MOST QUALIFIED, AT A FEE THE CORPORATION DETERMINES TO BE FAIR AND
REASONABLE TO THE CORPORATION, NEGOTIATIONS WITH THAT PROFESSIONAL FIRM
SHALL BE FORMALLY TERMINATED. THE CORPORATION SHALL THEN UNDERTAKE
NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE SECOND MOST QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL FIRM. FAILING
ACCORD WITH THE SECOND MOST QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL FIRM, THE CORPORATION
SHALL FORMALLY TERMINATE NEGOTIATIONS. THE CORPORATION SHALL THEN UNDER-
TAKE NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE THIRD MOST QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL FIRM.
SHOULD THE CORPORATION BE UNABLE TO NEGOTIATE A SATISFACTORY CONTRACT
WITH ANY OF THE SELECTED PROFESSIONAL FIRMS, IT SHALL SELECT ADDITIONAL
PROFESSIONAL FIRMS IN ORDER OF THEIR COMPETENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS AND
IT SHALL CONTINUE NEGOTIATIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS SECTION UNTIL AN
AGREEMENT IS REACHED. THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SUBPARAGRAPH SHALL ONLY
APPLY TO ENGINEERING AND/OR ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES AND/OR SURVEYING
SERVICES IN EXCESS OF TWENTY-FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS AND SHALL NOT APPLY
TO THE METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, THE NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT
AUTHORITY OR THE TRIBOROUGH BRIDGE AND TUNNEL AUTHORITY OR TO ANY OF
THEIR SUBSIDIARIES.
S 2. This act shall take effect immediately.