senate Bill S4271

2013-2014 Legislative Session

Provides that no modification of child support orders shall reduce or annul child support arrears accrued prior to the making of an application

download bill text pdf

Sponsored By

Archive: Last Bill Status - In Committee


  • Introduced
  • In Committee
  • On Floor Calendar
    • Passed Senate
    • Passed Assembly
  • Delivered to Governor
  • Signed/Vetoed by Governor

do you support this bill?

Actions

view actions (2)
Assembly Actions - Lowercase
Senate Actions - UPPERCASE
Jan 08, 2014 referred to judiciary
Mar 18, 2013 referred to judiciary

S4271 - Bill Details

Current Committee:
Law Section:
Family Court Act
Laws Affected:
Amd §455, Fam Ct Act

S4271 - Bill Texts

view summary

Provides that no modification of child support orders shall reduce or annul child support arrears accrued prior to the making of an application.

view sponsor memo
BILL NUMBER:S4271

TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the family court act, in relation to
child support arrears accrued prior to applications to modify child
support orders in supreme or family court

This is one in a series of measures being introduced at the request of
the Chief Administrative judge upon the recommendation of her Family
Court Advisory and Rules Committee.

In 1986, while enacting a comprehensive Governor's Program Bill
entitled the "New York State Child Support Enforcement Act of 1986,"
the Legislature amended sections 451(1) and 460(1) of the Family Court
Act to "[p]rohibit the cancellation or reduction of arrears for child
support and allow reduction or cancellation of arrears for spousal
support only upon a showing of "good cause." See Memorandum of
Support, L. 1986, c. 892. This Memorandum explained that:

This provision would make sure respondents are not "rewarded" by
reduction or forgiveness of arrears when they fail either to pay the
required support or to seek modification of the order. Arrears for
spousal support can be forgiven or reduced by a court in which case
the facts and circumstances constituting such good cause shall be set
forth in a written memorandum of decision.

The Governor's Memorandum of Approval stated that the legislation
"precludes forgiveness of child support arrears to ensure that
respondents are not financially rewarded either for failing to pay the
order or to seek its modification." See 1986 N.Y. Legis. Ann., at 361.
This legislation has led to a long line of cases holding that child
support arrears accrued prior to an application for modification may
not be vacated or reduced, in contrast to spousal maintenance (i.e.,
"other") arrears, which may be vacated or reduced upon a showing of
good cause why the obligor had not moved for modification prior to the
accrual of the arrears. See, e.g., Day. v. Tynan, 90 N.Y.2d 166
(1997); LiGreci v. LiGreci, 87 A.D.3d 722 (2d Dep't 2011); Moore v.
Abban, 72 A.D.3d 970 (2d Dep't 2010); Rosana R. v. James 14., 68
A.D.3d 549 (1st Dept., 2009); Cole v. Irizarry, 307 A.D.2d 890 (1st
Dep't 2003).

Neither the 1986 legislation nor subsequent amendments, however, made
conforming changes to section 455 of the Family Court Act. With
respect to cases in which a commitment of incarceration for a willful
violation of child support has been suspended, therefore, a child
support violator is now able to move pursuant to subdivisions two and
five of Family Court Act § 455 for modification of child support
obligations and may request a modification or cancellation of child
support arrears upon a showing of "good cause for failure to make
application for relief from the order directing payment prior to the
accrual of such arrears." This has the anomalous effect of permitting
support violators greater ability to avoid paying child support
arrears than other child support obligors who move for modification of
their obligations in accordance with Family Court Act § 451. In fact,
Prof. Merril Sobie, in his Practice Commentary to Family Court Act
455, suggests that support obligors intent on avoiding arrears may
even consent to a commitment on condition that it would be suspended,


which would then permit an application, upon good cause, for reduction
or cancellation of arrears. Prof. Sobie observes:

Surprisingly, the subdivision permits a modification which "shall
reduce or annul unpaid sums or installments accrued prior to the
making of such application," when the respondent shows "good cause"
for his failure to make application for arrears relief "prior to the
accrual of such arrears." ...

The power to reduce or annul arrears appears to conflict directly with
Section 451's requirement "... that the modification, set aside or
vacatur shall not reduce or annul child support arrears accrued prior
to the making of an application pursuant to this section." Indeed, the
gospel has been that, perhaps with very limited exception, arrears are
untouchable.... Is the apparent conflict an actual conflict, or does
Section 455 carve out a limited exception for cases where the
respondent has been committed? If the latter, avoiding the strict
Section 451 rule is a relatively straightforward, albeit somewhat
Machiavellian, process -- when the respondent is financially unable to
comply with the original or a prior order and has hence accumulated
arrears, commit pursuant to Section 454(3), and immediately grant
Section 455 relief, to wit suspend the commitment and reduce or annul
the arrears. The interrelationship and the possible conflicts between
sections 451 and 455 may be resolved only through caselaw development.

Rather than await caselaw development, we are submitting this measure
to harmonize subdivisions two and five of Family Court Act § 455 with
the provisions of Family Court Act §§ 451(1) and 460(1). The measure
makes clear that while support violators, whose commitments to jail
have been suspended, may move for relief from future payments, they
may not seek to reduce or annul child support arrears that have
accrued prior to their applications for modification. Other arrears,
that is, spousal maintenance arrears, continue to be subject to
modification where good cause has been demonstrated for the failure to
move for relief prior to their accrual. There is no basis to permit a
willful violator of child support obligations, whose sentence to jail
has been suspended, to stand in a better position to obtain relief
from those obligations than other support obligors. Consistent with
the rationale for the enactment of the amendment to sections 451(1)
and 460(1) of the Family Court Act in chapter 892 of the Laws of 1986,
therefore, we recommend enactment of a similar amendment to Family
Court Act § 455.

This measure, which would have no fiscal impact upon the State, would
take effect 90 days after becoming a law.

Legislative History:

None. New proposal.

view full text
download pdf
                    S T A T E   O F   N E W   Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________

                                  4271

                       2013-2014 Regular Sessions

                            I N  S E N A T E

                             March 18, 2013
                               ___________

Introduced  by Sen. BONACIC -- (at request of the Office of Court Admin-
  istration) -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed  to  be
  committed to the Committee on Judiciary

AN  ACT  to  amend  the  family  court act, in relation to child support
  arrears accrued prior to applications to modify child  support  orders
  in supreme or family court

  THE  PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

  Section 1. Subdivisions 2 and 5 of section 455  of  the  family  court
act,  as amended by chapter 533 of the laws of 1999, are amended to read
as follows:
  2. Except as provided in article five-B of this  act,  any  respondent
against  whom  an  order  of  commitment has been issued, if financially
unable to comply with any lawful order issued under this  article,  upon
such  notice  to such parties as the court may direct, may make applica-
tion to the court for an order relieving him or her of  FUTURE  payments
directed  in  such  order  and the commitment order. The court, upon the
hearing on such application, if satisfied by competent  proof  that  the
respondent  is  financially unable to comply with such order may, upon a
showing of good cause until further order  of  the  court,  modify  such
order  and  relieve  the  respondent from the commitment order.  NO SUCH
MODIFICATION SHALL REDUCE OR ANNUL CHILD SUPPORT ARREARS  ACCRUED  PRIOR
TO  THE  MAKING  OF  AN  APPLICATION  PURSUANT  TO THIS SECTION. No such
modification shall reduce or annul unpaid sums or installments OF  OTHER
ARREARS  accrued  prior  to  the  making  of such application unless the
defaulting party shows good cause for failure to  make  application  for
relief  from  the  order  directing payment prior to the accrual of such
arrears. Such modification may increase the amount to be  paid  pursuant
to a lawful order issued under this article nunc pro tunc based on newly
discovered evidence.

 EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                      [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                           LBD09329-01-3

S. 4271                             2

  5.  Any respondent may assert his or her financial inability to comply
with the directions contained in an order issued under this  article  or
an order or judgment entered in a matrimonial action or in an action for
the  enforcement  in  this  state  of a judgment in a matrimonial action
rendered  in  another  state,  as  a  defense in a proceeding instituted
against him or her under subdivision one of section four hundred  fifty-
four of this article or under the judiciary law to punish him or her for
failure  to  comply with such directions. If the court, upon the hearing
of such contempt proceeding, is satisfied by competent  proof  that  the
respondent  is financially unable to comply with such order or judgment,
it may, in its discretion, until further order of  the  court,  make  an
order  modifying  such  order or judgment and denying the application to
punish the respondent for contempt; provided, however, that if an  order
or  [judgement]  JUDGMENT  for  child support issued by another state is
before the court solely for enforcement, the court may only  modify  the
order  in accordance with article five-B of this act.  NO SUCH MODIFICA-
TION SHALL REDUCE OR ANNUL CHILD SUPPORT ARREARS ACCRUED  PRIOR  TO  THE
MAKING  OF AN APPLICATION PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION. No such modification
shall reduce or annul UNPAID  SUMS  OR  INSTALLMENTS  OF  OTHER  arrears
accrued  prior to the making of such application for modification unless
the defaulting party shows good cause for failure  to  make  application
for  relief  from  the order or judgment directing such payment prior to
the accrual of such  arrears.    Such  modification  may  increase  such
support  nunc  pro tunc as of the date of the application based on newly
discovered evidence. Any retroactive amount of support due shall be paid
in one sum or periodic sums, as the  court  shall  direct,  taking  into
account any amount of temporary support which has been paid.
  S  2.  This  act shall take effect on the ninetieth day after it shall
have become a law.

Comments

Open Legislation comments facilitate discussion of New York State legislation. All comments are subject to moderation. Comments deemed off-topic, commercial, campaign-related, self-promotional; or that contain profanity or hate speech; or that link to sites outside of the nysenate.gov domain are not permitted, and will not be published. Comment moderation is generally performed Monday through Friday.

By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and verify you are over 13.