S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________
S. 2012 A. 3012
S E N A T E - A S S E M B L Y
January 21, 2015
___________
IN SENATE -- A BUDGET BILL, submitted by the Governor pursuant to arti-
cle seven of the Constitution -- read twice and ordered printed, and
when printed to be committed to the Committee on Finance
IN ASSEMBLY -- A BUDGET BILL, submitted by the Governor pursuant to
article seven of the Constitution -- read once and referred to the
Committee on Ways and Means
AN ACT to amend the criminal procedure law, in relation to the defi-
nition of immunity and motions to dismiss information or indictment
based upon a claim of immunity
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Section 50.10 of the criminal procedure law is amended to
read as follows:
S 50.10 Compulsion of evidence by offer of immunity; definitions of
terms.
The following definitions are applicable to this article:
1. "Immunity." [A person who has been a witness in a legal proceed-
ing, and who cannot, except as otherwise provided in this subdivision,
be convicted of any offense or subjected to any penalty or forfeiture
for or on account of any transaction, matter or thing concerning which
he gave evidence therein, possesses "immunity" from any such conviction,
penalty or forfeiture.] (A) A PERSON WHO HAS BEEN A WITNESS IN A LEGAL
PROCEEDING, AND NEITHER THE EVIDENCE GIVEN BY THAT WITNESS NOR ANY
EVIDENCE DERIVED DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY THEREFROM MAY BE USED AGAINST
THE WITNESS IN THE SAME OR ANY OTHER CRIMINAL PROCEEDING OR IN THE IMPO-
SITION OF ANY PENALTY OR FORFEITURE POSSESSES "IMMUNITY".
(B) A person who possesses such immunity may nevertheless be convicted
of perjury as a result of having given false testimony in such legal
proceeding, and may be convicted of or adjudged in contempt as a result
of having contumaciously refused to give evidence therein, AND THE
EVIDENCE GIVEN BY THE PERSON AT THE PROCEEDING AT WHICH THE PERSON
POSSESSED IMMUNITY MAY BE USED AGAINST SUCH PERSON IN ANY SUCH PROSE-
CUTION FOR PERJURY OR PROSECUTION OR JUDGMENT FOR CONTEMPT.
EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD12577-01-5
S. 2012 2 A. 3012
2. "Legal proceeding" means a proceeding in or before any court or
grand jury, or before any body, agency or person authorized by law to
conduct the same and to administer the oath or to cause it to be admin-
istered.
3. "Give evidence" means to testify or produce physical evidence.
S 2. Section 170.30 of the criminal procedure law is amended by adding
a new subdivision 5 to read as follows:
5. WHERE THE DEFENDANT ESTABLISHES IN HIS OR HER MOTION THAT IMMUNITY
HAS BEEN CONFERRED UPON HIM OR HER, THE PEOPLE MUST THEN ESTABLISH, BY A
PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE, THAT SUCH EVIDENCE WAS NOT DERIVED,
DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, FROM THE EVIDENCE AS TO WHICH SUCH IMMUNITY WAS
CONFERRED.
S 3. Section 210.35 of the criminal procedure law is amended by adding
a new subdivision 4-a to read as follows:
4-A. EVIDENCE PROTECTED BY IMMUNITY WAS USED TO OBTAIN THE INDICTMENT;
OR
S 4. The opening paragraph and subdivisions 6 and 7 of section 710.20
of the criminal procedure law, the opening paragraph and subdivision 6
as amended by chapter 8 of the laws of 1976, subdivision 7 as added by
chapter 744 of the laws of 1988, and subdivision 6 as renumbered by
chapter 481 of the laws of 1983, are amended and a new subdivision 8 is
added to read as follows:
Upon motion of a defendant who (a) is aggrieved by unlawful or improp-
er acquisition of evidence and has reasonable cause to believe that such
may be offered against him in a criminal action, or (b) claims that
improper identification testimony may be offered against him in a crimi-
nal action, OR (C) CLAIMS THAT EVIDENCE AS TO THE USE OF WHICH HE OR SHE
POSSESSES IMMUNITY, MAY BE OFFERED AGAINST HIM IN A CRIMINAL ACTION, a
court may, under circumstances prescribed in this article, order that
such evidence be suppressed or excluded upon the ground that it:
6. Consists of potential testimony regarding an observation of the
defendant either at the time or place of the commission of the offense
or upon some other occasion relevant to the case, which potential testi-
mony would not be admissible upon the prospective trial of such charge
owing to an improperly made previous identification of the defendant by
the prospective witness[.]; OR
7. Consists of information obtained by means of a pen register or trap
and trace device installed or used in violation of the provisions of
article seven hundred five of this chapter[.]; OR
8. CONSISTS OF POTENTIAL EVIDENCE AS TO THE USE OF WHICH THE DEFENDANT
POSSESSES IMMUNITY. WHERE THE DEFENDANT ESTABLISHES THAT USE IMMUNITY
HAS BEEN CONFERRED UPON HIM OR HER, THE PEOPLE MUST THEN ESTABLISH, BY A
PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE, THAT SUCH EVIDENCE WAS NOT DERIVED,
DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, FROM THE EVIDENCE AS TO WHICH SUCH IMMUNITY WAS
CONFERRED.
S 5. Severability. If any clause, sentence, paragraph, section or part
of this act shall be adjudged by any court of competent jurisdiction to
be invalid, such judgment shall not affect, impair, or invalidate the
remainder thereof, but shall be confined in its operation to the clause,
sentence, paragraph, section or part thereof directly involved in the
controversy in which such judgment shall have been rendered.
S 6. This act shall take effect on the thirtieth day after it shall
have become a law and shall only apply to acts committed on or after
such date.