S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________
4307
2015-2016 Regular Sessions
I N S E N A T E
March 12, 2015
___________
Introduced by Sen. KRUEGER -- read twice and ordered printed, and when
printed to be committed to the Committee on Investigations and Govern-
ment Operations
AN ACT to amend the public officers law, the arts and cultural affairs
law, the executive law and the legislative law, in relation to the
retention of state electronic records; and to repeal subdivision 1 of
section 88 of the public officers law, relating to rules and regu-
lations governing access to state legislative records; to repeal
section 5 of the executive law, relating to executive records; and to
repeal section 70-0113 of the environmental conservation law, relating
to information confidentially disclosed by applicants
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Legislative intent. The legislature finds that procedures
and practice that promote transparency and accountability in the execu-
tive and legislative branches serve the public interest and encourage
public faith in government. Current policies which allow for the
destruction of emails and other electronic governmental records and
exempt the legislature from the Freedom of Information Law (FOIL) run
counter to these principles of transparency and accountability.
Computers and other electronic devices create many of the new records
we use today, most commonly via emails. These records, although elec-
tronic in format, are the same as records in other formats. Electronic
records show how you conduct business, make decisions, and carry out
your work. They are evidence of decisions and actions. Fundamental
records management principles should apply to electronic records, as
they apply to other record formats.
The executive branch has adopted a policy allowing automatic deletion
of emails after 90 days, which has the potential to severely limit the
public availability of vital information regarding the operations of
agencies. The consequences of such a policy are illustrated in a 2015
EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD09918-01-5
S. 4307 2
court case where the former Deputy Secretary for Gaming and Racing indi-
cated he was "aghast" to find that emails dating from 2013 relevant to
the case had been deleted. The deletion of these emails undermines the
ability of the plaintiff in the case to seek redress. An administration
spokesman defended deletion of the emails on the grounds they had not
been the subject of a FOIL request.
This legislation would ensure that under the guidance of the State
Archivist, agencies and legislative bodies would need to take a proac-
tive approach to the preservation of electronic records. It would estab-
lish strict standards for permanent preservation of the records of poli-
cymakers, and prohibit deletion of emails from other government
officials for at least seven years. It is modeled on federal policies
adopted after extensive study of appropriate practices for handling
electronic records. The state already uses email management software
that would enable implementation of such a policy at minimal cost.
The exemption of the legislature from the Freedom of Information Law
also undermines transparency and accountability. The public should have
access to the same types of information from the legislature that it can
already access from the Executive Branch through the FOIL process.
Recent scandals involving individual legislators only highlight the need
for increasing the availability of information regarding legislative
records. This bill would establish the same standards for treating the
Executive and Legislative branches under FOIL. The bill would also
extend to the legislature the various exemptions from disclosure in the
FOIL law, including records that would compromise personal privacy
rights or that are related to internal deliberations of the body or
agency.
S 2. Subdivision 3 of section 86 of the public officers law, as added
by chapter 933 of the laws of 1977, is amended and a new subdivision 6
is added to read as follows:
3. "Agency" means any state or municipal department, board, bureau,
division, commission, committee, public authority, public corporation,
council, office or other governmental entity performing a governmental
or proprietary function for the state or any one or more municipalities
thereof, except the judiciary [or the state legislature].
6. "ARCHIVES" MEANS ANY INSTITUTION THAT ARCHIVES RECORDS FOR THE
STATE, AND PROVIDES A MEANS FOR PUBLIC ACCESS AND REVIEW OF SUCH
RECORDS, INCLUDING A RESEARCH UNIVERSITY, THAT IS SELECTED BY THE GOVER-
NOR FOR RECORD RETENTION.
S 3. Subdivision 1 of section 88 of the public officers law is
REPEALED.
S 4. The public officers law is amended by adding a new section 88-a
to read as follows:
S 88-A. ELECTRONIC RECORDS RETENTION. 1. EACH AGENCY, IN CONJUNCTION
WITH THE STATE ARCHIVES, SHALL PRESERVE ELECTRONIC RECORDS IN ACCORDANCE
WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION.
2. EACH AGENCY SHALL IDENTIFY THE ACCOUNTS OF PUBLIC OFFICERS, STATE
OFFICIALS AND POLICY MAKERS WHO, BY VIRTUE OF THEIR WORK, OFFICE, OR
POSITION, ARE LIKELY TO CREATE OR RECEIVE PERMANENTLY VALUABLE RECORDS.
FOR THE PURPOSE OF THIS SECTION, "POLICY MAKER" MEANS ANY INDIVIDUAL
SUBJECT TO SECTION SEVENTY-THREE-A OF THE PUBLIC OFFICERS LAW.
3. (A) THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION AND OF ARTICLE SIX OF THIS CHAP-
TER SHALL APPLY TO ALL AGENCY-ADMINISTERED EMAIL ACCOUNTS OF ANY PUBLIC
OFFICER, STATE OFFICIAL OR POLICY MAKER, INCLUDING ACCOUNTS MANAGED BY
OTHER STAFF, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO PERSONAL ASSISTANTS, CONFI-
DENTIAL ASSISTANTS, OR ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANTS.
S. 4307 3
(B) THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION AND OF ARTICLE SIX OF THIS CHAPTER
SHALL APPLY TO ALL AGENCY-ADMINISTERED EMAIL ACCOUNTS OF ANY PUBLIC
OFFICER, STATE OFFICIAL OR POLICY MAKER, REGARDLESS OF THE ADDRESS NAMES
USED BY THE PUBLIC OFFICIAL FOR AGENCY BUSINESS.
4. ELECTRONIC RECORDS SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
FOLLOWING GENERAL RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE:
(A) EMAIL OF POLICY MAKERS. AGENCIES SHALL TRANSFER DOCUMENTATION
ADEQUATE TO IDENTIFY, SERVICE, AND INTERPRET THE PERMANENT ELECTRONIC
RECORDS, WHICH INCLUDES THE POSITION TITLE AND BEGIN AND END DATES FOR
EACH EMAIL ACCOUNT CAPTURED IN THIS SUBDIVISION. THE DISPOSITION OF
EMAIL DESCRIBED IN THIS PARAGRAPH IS PERMANENT. SUCH EMAIL SHALL BE
TRANSFERRED TO THE STATE ARCHIVES NO SOONER THAN FIFTEEN YEARS AFTER THE
DATE OF THE EMAIL AND NO LATER THAN TWENTY-FIVE YEARS AFTER THE AGENCY
DETERMINED CUT-OFF DATE.
(B) EMAIL OF OTHER OFFICIALS. AGENCIES SHALL TRANSFER DOCUMENTATION
ADEQUATE TO IDENTIFY, SERVICE, AND INTERPRET THE PERMANENT ELECTRONIC
RECORDS, WHICH INCLUDES THE POSITION TITLE AND BEGIN AND END DATES FOR
EACH EMAIL ACCOUNT CAPTURED IN THIS SUBDIVISION. THE DISPOSITION OF
EMAIL DESCRIBED IN THIS PARAGRAPH IS TEMPORARY. SUCH EMAIL SHALL BE
TRANSFERRED TO THE STATE ARCHIVES NO SOONER THAN SEVEN YEARS AFTER THE
DATE OF THE EMAIL, PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT LONGER RETENTION IS AUTHOR-
IZED IF REQUIRED FOR BUSINESS USE BY THE AGENCY.
5. PRODUCTION OF ELECTRONIC RECORDS BY AGENCIES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE
FOLLOWING PROVISIONS:
(A) AGENCIES SHALL TRANSFER TO THE STATE ARCHIVES DOCUMENTATION
ADEQUATE TO IDENTIFY, SERVICE, AND INTERPRET THE PERMANENT ELECTRONIC
RECORDS.
(B) DOCUMENTATION FOR DATA FILES AND DATA BASES MUST INCLUDE RECORD
LAYOUTS, DATA ELEMENT DEFINITIONS, AND CODE TRANSLATION TABLES (CODE-
BOOKS) FOR CODED DATA. DATA ELEMENT DEFINITIONS, CODES USED TO REPRESENT
DATA VALUES, AND INTERPRETATIONS OF THESE CODES MUST MATCH THE ACTUAL
FORMAT AND CODES AS TRANSFERRED.
(C) DIGITAL GEOSPATIAL DATA FILES MUST INCLUDE THE DOCUMENTATION SPEC-
IFIED IN PARAGRAPH (B) OF THIS SUBDIVISION. IN ADDITION, DOCUMENTATION
FOR DIGITAL GEOSPATIAL DATA FILES CAN INCLUDE METADATA THAT CONFORMS TO
THE FEDERAL GEOGRAPHIC DATA COMMITTEE'S CONTENT STANDARDS FOR DIGITAL
GEOSPATIAL METADATA, AS SPECIFIED IN EXECUTIVE ORDER 12906 OF APRIL 11,
1994 (3 CFR, 1995 COMP., P. 882).
(D) DOCUMENTATION FOR ELECTRONIC FILES CONTAINING TEXTUAL DOCUMENTS
WITH SGML TAGS MUST INCLUDE A TABLE FOR INTERPRETING THE SGML TAGS, WHEN
APPROPRIATE.
(E) DOCUMENTATION FOR THE FOLLOWING TYPES OF ELECTRONIC RECORDS MUST
CONFORM TO FORMATS SPECIFIED IN NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINIS-
TRATION BULLETIN 2014-04; APPENDIX A: REVISED FORMAT GUIDANCE FOR THE
TRANSFER OF PERMANENT ELECTRONIC RECORDS. TABLES OF FILE FORMATS;
PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT THE STATE ARCHIVE MAY APPROVE ADDITIONAL ACCEPT-
ABLE FILE FORMATS:
(I) EMAIL MESSAGES WITH ATTACHMENTS;
(II) SCANNED IMAGES OF TEXTUAL RECORDS;
(III) RECORDS IN PORTABLE DOCUMENT FORMAT (PDF);
(IV) DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORDS; AND
(V) WEB CONTENT RECORDS.
6. (A) ANY AGGRIEVED PERSON SHALL HAVE STANDING TO ENFORCE THE
PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION AGAINST A PUBLIC BODY BY THE COMMENCEMENT OF
A PROCEEDING PURSUANT TO ARTICLE SEVENTY-EIGHT OF THE CIVIL PRACTICE LAW
AND RULES, OR AN ACTION FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF.
S. 4307 4
IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING, IF A COURT DETERMINES THAT AN AGENCY
FAILED TO COMPLY WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION, THE COURT SHALL
HAVE THE POWER, IN ITS DISCRETION, UPON GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, TO DECLARE
THAT THE AGENCY VIOLATED THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION. IF THE COURT
DETERMINES THAT AN AGENCY HAS VIOLATED THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION,
THE COURT MAY REQUIRE THE MEMBERS OF THE AGENCY TO PARTICIPATE IN A
TRAINING SESSION CONCERNING THE OBLIGATIONS IMPOSED BY THIS SECTION
CONDUCTED BY THE STAFF OF THE COMMITTEE ON OPEN GOVERNMENT.
(B) IN ANY PROCEEDING BROUGHT PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION, COSTS AND
REASONABLE ATTORNEY'S FEES MAY BE AWARDED BY THE COURT, IN ITS
DISCRETION, TO THE SUCCESSFUL PARTY. IF A COURT DETERMINES THAT AN ELEC-
TRONIC RECORD WAS NOT RETAINED IN MATERIAL VIOLATION OF THIS ARTICLE,
THE COURT SHALL AWARD COSTS AND REASONABLE ATTORNEY'S FEES TO THE
SUCCESSFUL PETITIONER, UNLESS THERE WAS A REASONABLE BASIS FOR THE AGEN-
CY TO BELIEVE THAT IT WAS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS
SECTION.
(C) THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS IN AN ARTICLE SEVENTY-EIGHT PROCEEDING
WITH RESPECT TO AN ACTION TAKEN AT EXECUTIVE SESSION SHALL COMMENCE TO
RUN FROM THE DATE THE ELECTRONIC RECORD AT ISSUE HAS BEEN MADE AVAILABLE
TO THE PUBLIC.
7. NOTHING IN THIS SECTION SHALL BAR AN EMPLOYEE OF AN AGENCY FROM
MAINTAINING A RECORD SLATED FOR DESTRUCTION UNDER THE RETENTION SCHED-
ULES DEVELOPED PURSUANT TO SECTION 57.06 OF THE ARTS AND CULTURAL
AFFAIRS LAW, IF SUCH RECORD IS RELEVANT TO AN ONGOING MATTER AND SUCH
DISCLOSURE WOULD NOT VIOLATE ANY PRIVILEGE OR CONFIDENTIALITY INTEREST.
S 5. Subparagraphs vi and vii of paragraph (b) of subdivision 2 of
section 89 of the public officers law, as amended by section 11 of part
U of chapter 61 of the laws of 2011, are amended and a new subparagraph
viii is added to read as follows:
vi. information of a personal nature contained in a workers' compen-
sation record, except as provided by section one hundred ten-a of the
workers' compensation law; [or]
vii. disclosure of electronic contact information, such as an e-mail
address or a social network username, that has been collected from a
taxpayer under section one hundred four of the real property tax law[.];
AND
VIII. COMMUNICATIONS OF A PERSONAL NATURE BETWEEN STATE LEGISLATORS
AND THEIR CONSTITUENTS.
S 6. The arts and cultural affairs law is amended by adding a new
section 57.06 to read as follows:
S 57.06. ELECTRONIC RECORDS RETENTION. 1. THE STATE ARCHIVES SHALL
DEVELOP AND IMPLEMENT A PROTOCOL FOR THE PRESERVATION OF ELECTRONIC
RECORDS OF THE STATE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS ARTICLE.
SUCH PROTOCOL SHALL INCLUDE:
(A) A PROCESS BY WHICH SENDERS AND RECIPIENTS OF ELECTRONIC MAIL CAN
CATEGORIZE SUCH MAIL INTO RECORDS THAT WILL BE RETAINED, AND THOSE THAT
WILL BE SUBJECT TO PROCEDURES FOR REGULAR DISPOSITION OF SUCH RECORDS IN
THE ORDINARY COURSE OF BUSINESS;
(B) THE DELINEATION OF SUCH OTHER STANDARDS OR PROCEDURES WHICH WILL
ASSIST IN THE IDENTIFICATION AND PRESERVATION OF ELECTRONIC RECORDS;
(C) THE IDENTIFICATION OF SOFTWARE AND OTHER TECHNOLOGICAL AIDS THAT
WOULD FACILITATE RECORDS PRESERVATION AND REVIEW, AND WHICH MAY BE
PURCHASED WITHIN AVAILABLE RESOURCES; AND
(D) A SCHEDULE FOR RECORDS RETENTION FOR SPECIFIC TYPES OF RECORDS AND
IDENTIFICATION OF HISTORICALLY IMPORTANT RECORDS DEVELOPED IN CONCERT
WITH THE AGENCIES PROVIDING THE ELECTRONIC RECORDS.
S. 4307 5
2. NOTHING IN THIS SECTION SHALL BAR AN EMPLOYEE OF THE STATE ARCHIVES
FROM MAINTAINING A RECORD SLATED FOR DESTRUCTION UNDER THE RETENTION
SCHEDULE, OR FROM PROVIDING SUCH RECORD TO AN AGENCY, IF SUCH RECORD IS
RELEVANT TO AN ONGOING MATTER, AND SUCH DISCLOSURE WOULD NOT VIOLATE ANY
PRIVILEGE OR CONFIDENTIALITY INTEREST.
S 7. Section 5 of the executive law is REPEALED.
S 8. Subdivision 3 of section 713 of the executive law, as amended by
section 16 of part B of chapter 56 of the laws of 2010, is amended to
read as follows:
3. Any reports prepared pursuant to this article shall not be subject
to disclosure pursuant to [section eighty-eight] ARTICLE SIX of the
public officers law.
S 9. The legislative law is amended by adding a new section 33-a to
read as follows:
S 33-A. DISCLOSURE. ALL MEMBERS, OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES OF THE SENATE
AND THE ASSEMBLY SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE SIX OF
THE PUBLIC OFFICERS LAW.
S 10. Section 70-0113 of the environmental conservation law is
REPEALED.
S 11. This act shall take effect on the one hundred twentieth day
after it shall have become a law.