S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________
6342
I N S E N A T E
(PREFILED)
January 6, 2016
___________
Introduced by Sen. HOYLMAN -- read twice and ordered printed, and when
printed to be committed to the Committee on Investigations and Govern-
ment Operations
AN ACT to amend the executive law, in relation to prohibiting employers
from seeking salary history from prospective employees
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Legislative intent. The legislature hereby finds that New
York should lead the nation in preventing wage discrimination.
The wage gap between men and women is one of the oldest and most
persistent effects of inequality between the sexes in the United States.
The 1963 Equal Pay Act and the 1964 Civil Rights Act in the United
States established the legal right to equal pay for equal work and equal
opportunity. Yet half a century later, women are still subjected to wage
gaps and paid less then men.
The concept of comparable worth attacks the problem of gender-based
wage discrimination by mandating that jobs characterized by similar
levels of education, skill, effort, responsibilities, and working condi-
tions be compensated at similar wage levels regardless of the gender of
the worker holding the job.
The goal of pay equity is to raise the wages for undervalued jobs held
predominantly by women. Today, women make only 77 cents per every
dollar earned by a man for a comparable job, a gender wage gap of 23
percent.
This translates into thousands of dollars of lost wages each year for
each female worker, money that helps them feed their families, save for
a college education and afford decent and safe housing.
Pay disparities affect women of all ages, races, and education levels,
but are more pronounced for women of color. Minority women make as
little as 54 cents per dollar for a comparable job held by a man.
Female-dominated jobs pay twenty to thirty percent less than male-do-
minated jobs classified as comparable in worth and more than one half of
all women work in jobs that are over seventy percent female.
EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD06362-01-5
S. 6342 2
Women are more likely to enter poverty in old age for several reasons:
A lifetime of lower wages means women have less income to save for
retirement, and less income that counts in their Social Security or
pension benefit formula.
The current life expectancy for women means they will, on an average
of three years, outlive men. Yet they will have to stretch their retire-
ment savings, which are less to begin with, over a longer period of
time.
The existence of pay inequity is a manifestation of deep-seated sex
discrimination that prevents both equality of pay for women and equality
of opportunity for both sexes.
More women in the United States are obtaining college degrees and
increasing their participation in the labor force and family-friendly
legislation, including the Equal Pay Act, Family and Medical Leave Act,
and Pregnancy Discrimination Act, and policies such as flex time and
telecommuting, have increased options to create a win-win situation for
women and their employers.
Despite the progress, women continue to suffer the consequences of
inequitable pay differentials: in 2010, the average college-educated
woman working full-time earned $47,000 a year compared to $64,000 for a
college-educated man.
During 2012, median weekly earnings for female full-time workers were
$691, compared with $854 per week for men, a gender wage gap of 19
percent.
Fair pay strengthens the security of families and eases future retire-
ment costs while also strengthening the American economy. In order to
achieve fair pay, policymakers must enact laws that prevent gender based
wage discrimination from when women enter the labor force.
In order to do so, it is necessary to prevent employers to base a
woman's pay based on her previous pay history. Because the pay is
already based on gender discrimination, allowing pay history to be
requested by employers is equivalent to maintaining a standard of lower
pay for women performing similar jobs as men. This practice of asking
for pay history must be outlawed.
S 2. Section 296 of the executive law is amended by adding a new
subdivision 19-a to read as follows:
19-A. IT SHALL BE AN UNLAWFUL DISCRIMINATORY PRACTICE OF ANY EMPLOYER,
LABOR ORGANIZATION, EMPLOYMENT AGENCY OR LICENSING AGENCY, OR EMPLOYEES
OR AGENTS THEREOF, TO SEEK A SALARY HISTORY FROM A PROSPECTIVE EMPLOYEE
FOR AN INTERVIEW OR AS A CONDITION FOR EMPLOYMENT.
S 3. The department of labor, in conjunction with the New York state
division of human rights, shall establish a public awareness campaign,
available on their respective websites, informing employers in the state
that it is illegal to seek salary information from prospective employ-
ees.
S 4. This act shall take effect on the ninetieth day after it shall
have become a law.