Assembly Actions -
Lowercase Senate Actions - UPPERCASE |
|
---|---|
Nov 28, 2016 |
tabled vetoed memo.298 |
Nov 16, 2016 |
delivered to governor |
Jun 17, 2016 |
returned to assembly passed senate ordered to third reading cal.2016 |
Jun 14, 2016 |
delivered to senate passed assembly |
Jun 08, 2016 |
amended on third reading 8019c |
Jun 06, 2016 |
amended on third reading 8019b |
May 17, 2016 |
amended on third reading (t) 8019a |
Jan 06, 2016 |
ordered to third reading cal.327 returned to assembly died in senate |
Jun 24, 2015 |
referred to rules delivered to senate passed assembly |
Jun 19, 2015 |
ordered to third reading rules cal.723 rules report cal.723 reported |
Jun 18, 2015 |
reported referred to rules |
Jun 16, 2015 |
reported referred to ways and means |
Jun 04, 2015 |
referred to education |
Assembly Bill A8019
Vetoed By Governor2015-2016 Legislative Session
Sponsored By
O'DONNELL
Archive: Last Bill Status - Vetoed by Governor
- Introduced
-
- In Committee Assembly
- In Committee Senate
-
- On Floor Calendar Assembly
- On Floor Calendar Senate
-
- Passed Assembly
- Passed Senate
- Vetoed By Governor
- Signed By Governor
Actions
Votes
Bill Amendments
co-Sponsors
William Colton
Andrew Raia
Harry B. Bronson
2015-A8019 - Details
- Law Section:
- Education Law
- Laws Affected:
- Amd §305, Ed L
2015-A8019 - Bill Text download pdf
S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K ________________________________________________________________________ 8019 2015-2016 Regular Sessions I N A S S E M B L Y June 4, 2015 ___________ Introduced by M. of A. O'DONNELL -- read once and referred to the Committee on Education AN ACT to amend the education law, in relation to contracts for the transportation of school children THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM- BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Statement of legislative findings and necessity. The legis- lature hereby finds that for three decades beginning in 1979, following a strike by school bus workers, the school bus contracts of the board of education of the city of New York included employee protection provisions requiring transportation contractors, among other things, to give priority in hiring to employees who became unemployed because of their employers' loss of bus contract work for such board and to pay such employees the same wages and benefits they had received prior to becoming unemployed. Following the 2011 decision by the New York State Court of Appeals in L&M BUS CORP., ET AL., V. THE NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, ET AL., the board of education of the city of New York did not include the employee protection provisions that had been part of the board's school bus contracts for over 30 years or any similar provisions in its solic- itations for its school bus contracts. After the issuance of the first such Post-L&M solicitation; there was a school bus strike in January and February of 2013. During this strike, many children were either unable to attend school or were burdened, along with their families, with find- ing alternative modes of transportation in the heart of winter. The legislature further finds that the board of education of the city of New York contracts with 62 companies to provide vital school bus transportation to 149,000 school-age children. Pursuant to the education law, the state reimburses the board of education of the city of New York for a substantial percentage of its school bus contract expenditures. EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [ ] is old law to be omitted. LBD10792-01-5
co-Sponsors
William Colton
Andrew Raia
Harry B. Bronson
2015-A8019A - Details
- Law Section:
- Education Law
- Laws Affected:
- Amd §305, Ed L
2015-A8019A - Bill Text download pdf
S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K ________________________________________________________________________ 8019--A Cal. No. 327 2015-2016 Regular Sessions I N A S S E M B L Y June 4, 2015 ___________ Introduced by M. of A. O'DONNELL, COLTON, RAIA, BRONSON -- read once and referred to the Committee on Education -- advanced to a third reading, amended and ordered reprinted, retaining its place on the order of third reading AN ACT to amend the education law and the tax law, in relation to contracts for the transportation of school children THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM- BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Statement of legislative findings and necessity. The legis- lature hereby finds that for three decades beginning in 1979, following a strike by school bus workers, the school bus contracts of the board of education of the city of New York included employee protection provisions requiring transportation contractors, among other things, to give priority in hiring to employees who became unemployed because of their employers' loss of bus contract work for such board and to pay such employees the same wages and benefits they had received prior to becoming unemployed. Following the 2011 decision by the New York State Court of Appeals in L&M BUS CORP., ET AL., V. THE NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, ET AL., the board of education of the city of New York did not include the employee protection provisions that had been part of the board's school bus contracts for over 30 years or any similar provisions in its solic- itations for its school bus contracts. After the issuance of the first such Post-L&M solicitation; there was a school bus strike in January and February of 2013. During this strike, many children were either unable to attend school or were burdened, along with their families, with find- ing alternative modes of transportation in the heart of winter. The legislature further finds that the board of education of the city of New York contracts with 62 companies to provide vital school bus transportation to 149,000 school-age children. Pursuant to the education EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [ ] is old law to be omitted. LBD10792-03-6
co-Sponsors
William Colton
Andrew Raia
Harry B. Bronson
2015-A8019B - Details
- Law Section:
- Education Law
- Laws Affected:
- Amd §305, Ed L
2015-A8019B - Bill Text download pdf
S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K ________________________________________________________________________ 8019--B Cal. No. 327 2015-2016 Regular Sessions I N A S S E M B L Y June 4, 2015 ___________ Introduced by M. of A. O'DONNELL, COLTON, RAIA, BRONSON -- read once and referred to the Committee on Education -- advanced to a third reading, amended and ordered reprinted, retaining its place on the order of third reading -- again amended on third reading, ordered reprinted, retaining its place on the order of third reading AN ACT to amend the education law and the tax law, in relation to contracts for the transportation of school children THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM- BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Statement of legislative findings and necessity. The legis- lature hereby finds that for three decades beginning in 1979, following a strike by school bus workers, the school bus contracts of the board of education of the city of New York included employee protection provisions requiring transportation contractors, among other things, to give priority in hiring to employees who became unemployed because of their employers' loss of bus contract work for such board and to pay such employees the same wages and benefits they had received prior to becoming unemployed. Following the 2011 decision by the New York State Court of Appeals in L&M BUS CORP., ET AL., V. THE NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, ET AL., the board of education of the city of New York did not include the employee protection provisions that had been part of the board's school bus contracts for over 30 years or any similar provisions in its solic- itations for its school bus contracts. After the issuance of the first such Post-L&M solicitation; there was a school bus strike in January and February of 2013. During this strike, many children were either unable to attend school or were burdened, along with their families, with find- ing alternative modes of transportation in the heart of winter. The legislature further finds that the board of education of the city of New York contracts with 62 companies to provide vital school bus transportation to 149,000 school-age children. Pursuant to the education EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [ ] is old law to be omitted.
co-Sponsors
William Colton
Andrew Raia
Harry B. Bronson
2015-A8019C (ACTIVE) - Details
- Law Section:
- Education Law
- Laws Affected:
- Amd §305, Ed L
2015-A8019C (ACTIVE) - Bill Text download pdf
S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K ________________________________________________________________________ 8019--C Cal. No. 327 2015-2016 Regular Sessions I N A S S E M B L Y June 4, 2015 ___________ Introduced by M. of A. O'DONNELL, COLTON, RAIA, BRONSON -- read once and referred to the Committee on Education -- advanced to a third reading, amended and ordered reprinted, retaining its place on the order of third reading -- again amended on third reading, ordered reprinted, retaining its place on the order of third reading -- again amended on third reading, ordered reprinted, retaining its place on the order of third reading AN ACT to amend the education law and the tax law, in relation to contracts for the transportation of school children THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM- BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Statement of legislative findings and necessity. The legis- lature hereby finds that for three decades beginning in 1979, following a strike by school bus workers, the school bus contracts of the board of education of the city of New York included employee protection provisions requiring transportation contractors, among other things, to give priority in hiring to employees who became unemployed because of their employers' loss of bus contract work for such board and to pay such employees the same wages and benefits they had received prior to becoming unemployed. Following the 2011 decision by the New York State Court of Appeals in L&M BUS CORP., ET AL., V. THE NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, ET AL., the board of education of the city of New York did not include the employee protection provisions that had been part of the board's school bus contracts for over 30 years or any similar provisions in its solic- itations for its school bus contracts. After the issuance of the first such Post-L&M solicitation; there was a school bus strike in January and February of 2013. During this strike, many children were either unable to attend school or were burdened, along with their families, with find- ing alternative modes of transportation in the heart of winter. EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [ ] is old law to be omitted. LBD10792-07-6
Comments
Open Legislation is a forum for New York State legislation. All comments are subject to review and community moderation is encouraged.
Comments deemed off-topic, commercial, campaign-related, self-promotional; or that contain profanity, hate or toxic speech; or that link to sites outside of the nysenate.gov domain are not permitted, and will not be published. Attempts to intimidate and silence contributors or deliberately deceive the public, including excessive or extraneous posting/posts, or coordinated activity, are prohibited and may result in the temporary or permanent banning of the user. Comment moderation is generally performed Monday through Friday. By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and verify you are over 13.
Create an account. An account allows you to sign petitions with a single click, officially support or oppose key legislation, and follow issues, committees, and bills that matter to you. When you create an account, you agree to this platform's terms of participation.