Assembly Actions -
Lowercase Senate Actions - UPPERCASE |
|
---|---|
Jan 03, 2018 |
ordered to third reading cal.519 |
Jun 05, 2017 |
amended on third reading 7447a |
May 25, 2017 |
advanced to third reading cal.552 |
May 23, 2017 |
reported |
Apr 25, 2017 |
referred to codes |
Assembly Bill A7447A
2017-2018 Legislative Session
Sponsored By
JOYNER
Archive: Last Bill Status - On Floor Calendar
- Introduced
-
- In Committee Assembly
- In Committee Senate
-
- On Floor Calendar Assembly
- On Floor Calendar Senate
-
- Passed Assembly
- Passed Senate
- Delivered to Governor
- Signed By Governor
Actions
Bill Amendments
2017-A7447 - Details
- Law Section:
- Criminal Procedure Law
- Laws Affected:
- Rpld §290.10 subs 2 & 3, rpld §450.40 sub 2, amd §§290.10 & 450.40, CP L
- Versions Introduced in 2015-2016 Legislative Session:
-
A9521
2017-A7447 - Bill Text download pdf
S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K ________________________________________________________________________ 7447 2017-2018 Regular Sessions I N A S S E M B L Y April 25, 2017 ___________ Introduced by M. of A. JOYNER -- (at request of the Office of Court Administration) -- read once and referred to the Committee on Codes AN ACT to amend the criminal procedure law, in relation to erroneously excluded evidence and trial orders of dismissal; and to repeal certain provisions of such law relating thereto THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM- BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Subdivisions 2 and 3 of section 290.10 of the criminal procedure law are REPEALED. § 2. Subdivision 1 of section 450.40 of the criminal procedure law is amended to read as follows: [1.] An appeal by the people from a trial order of dismissal, as authorized by subdivision two of section 450.20, may, as indicated by section 290.10, be based [either (a)] upon the ground that the evidence adduced at the trial was legally sufficient to support the count or counts of the accusatory instrument dismissed by the order[, or (b) upon the ground that, though not legally sufficient, such evidence would have been legally sufficient had the court not erroneously excluded admissi- ble evidence offered by the people]. § 3. Subdivision 2 of section 450.40 of the criminal procedure law is REPEALED. § 4. This act shall take effect immediately. EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [ ] is old law to be omitted. LBD10362-01-7
co-Sponsors
Ron Castorina Jr.
2017-A7447A (ACTIVE) - Details
- Law Section:
- Criminal Procedure Law
- Laws Affected:
- Rpld §290.10 subs 2 & 3, rpld §450.40 sub 2, amd §§290.10 & 450.40, CP L
- Versions Introduced in 2015-2016 Legislative Session:
-
A9521
2017-A7447A (ACTIVE) - Bill Text download pdf
S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K ________________________________________________________________________ 7447--A Cal. No. 552 2017-2018 Regular Sessions I N A S S E M B L Y April 25, 2017 ___________ Introduced by M. of A. JOYNER -- (at request of the Office of Court Administration) -- read once and referred to the Committee on Codes -- reported from committee, advanced to a third reading, amended and ordered reprinted, retaining its place on the order of third reading AN ACT to amend the criminal procedure law, in relation to erroneously excluded evidence and trial orders of dismissal; and to repeal certain provisions of such law relating thereto THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM- BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Subdivision 1 of section 290.10 of the criminal procedure law, as amended by chapter 170 of the laws of 1983, is amended to read as follows: 1. At the conclusion of the people's case or at the conclusion of all the evidence, the court may, [except as provided in subdivision two,] upon motion of the defendant, (a) issue a "trial order of dismissal," dismissing any count of an indictment upon the ground that the trial evidence is not legally sufficient to establish the offense charged therein or any lesser included offense, or (b) reserve decision on the motion until after the verdict has been rendered and accepted by the court. Where the court has reserved decision and the jury thereafter renders a verdict of guilty, the court shall proceed to determine the motion upon such evidence as it would have been authorized to consider upon the motion had the court not reserved decision. If the court deter- mines that such motion should have been granted upon the ground speci- fied in paragraph (a) herein, it shall enter an order both setting aside the verdict and dismissing any count of the indictment upon such ground. If the jury is discharged before rendition of a verdict the court shall proceed to determine the motion as set forth in this paragraph. § 2. Subdivisions 2 and 3 of section 290.10 of the criminal procedure law are REPEALED. EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [ ] is old law to be omitted.
Comments
Open Legislation is a forum for New York State legislation. All comments are subject to review and community moderation is encouraged.
Comments deemed off-topic, commercial, campaign-related, self-promotional; or that contain profanity, hate or toxic speech; or that link to sites outside of the nysenate.gov domain are not permitted, and will not be published. Attempts to intimidate and silence contributors or deliberately deceive the public, including excessive or extraneous posting/posts, or coordinated activity, are prohibited and may result in the temporary or permanent banning of the user. Comment moderation is generally performed Monday through Friday. By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and verify you are over 13.
Create an account. An account allows you to sign petitions with a single click, officially support or oppose key legislation, and follow issues, committees, and bills that matter to you. When you create an account, you agree to this platform's terms of participation.