S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________
2091
2017-2018 Regular Sessions
I N S E N A T E
January 12, 2017
___________
Introduced by Sens. MURPHY, TEDISCO, CROCI, FUNKE, GALLIVAN, GRIFFO,
MARCHIONE -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be
committed to the Committee on Education
AN ACT to amend the education law, in relation to enacting the "common
core parental refusal act"
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Short title. This act shall be known and may be cited as
the "common core parental refusal act".
§ 2. Section 305 of the education law is amended by adding a new
subdivision 51-b to read as follows:
51-B. THE COMMISSIONER SHALL ENSURE THAT SCHOOL DISTRICTS NOTIFY
PARENTS OF STUDENTS IN GRADES THREE THROUGH EIGHT, EITHER BY EMAIL
AND/OR A MAILED LETTER, THAT SUCH STUDENTS MAY REFUSE TO PARTICIPATE IN
ALL STATE TESTING PROVIDED BY PEARSON OR ANY OTHER STATE TESTING BASED
ON COMMON CORE STANDARDS. SUCH NOTIFICATION SHALL BE GIVEN NO SOONER
THAN FOURTEEN DAYS AND NO LATER THAN SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED
ADMINISTRATION OF SUCH TESTING. SUCH NOTIFICATION SHALL READ AS
FOLLOWS:
"IT IS THE RIGHT OF EVERY PARENT TO DIRECT THE UPBRINGING AND EDUCA-
TION OF THEIR CHILDREN. PARENTS MAY REFUSE TO PERMIT THEIR CHILDREN TO
TAKE STATE TESTING PROVIDED BY PEARSON OR ANY OTHER STATE TESTING BASED
ON COMMON CORE STANDARDS. PARENTS WHO REFUSE TO PERMIT THEIR CHILDREN TO
TAKE SUCH TESTS MAY FILL OUT AND RETURN THE ATTACHED FORM. NO PUNITIVE
MEASURES MAY BE TAKEN AGAINST STUDENTS WHO REFUSE TO PARTICIPATE IN SUCH
TESTING, NOR SHALL STUDENTS WHO DO PARTICIPATE IN SUCH TESTING RECEIVE
ANY INCENTIVE OR REWARD FOR DOING SO."
THE TEXT OF SUCH NOTIFICATION SHALL BE POSTED ON SCHOOL DISTRICT
WEBSITES.
THE RESPONSE FORM, WHICH SHALL BE CONTAINED WITHIN THE NOTIFICATION,
SHALL READ AS FOLLOWS:
EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD02223-01-7
S. 2091 2
"AS THE PARENT OR LEGAL GUARDIAN OF ___________(CHILD'S FULL NAME), I
RESPECTFULLY AND FORMALLY STATE MY REFUSAL TO PERMIT MY CHILD TO TAKE
PART IN TESTING PROVIDED BY PEARSON OR ANY OTHER STATE TESTING BASED ON
COMMON CORE STANDARDS. MY CHILD SHALL BE SCORED AS A 'REFUSAL', RATHER
THAN AS 'ABSENT', IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STUDENT INFORMATION REPOSITORY
SYSTEM, AND THEREFORE MY CHILD WILL CONTINUE TO RECEIVE A FREE AND
APPROPRIATE PUBLIC EDUCATION IN HIS/HER REGULAR CLASSROOM ENVIRONMENT
DURING THE ADMINISTRATION OF ALL MAKEUP TEST PERIODS AS THIS LETTER
PROVIDES WRITTEN VERIFICATION OF A 'REFUSAL' FOR ALL TESTS."
NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER LAW, RULE OR REGULATION TO THE CONTRARY, IT
SHALL BE UNLAWFUL FOR ANY SCHOOL DISTRICT TO REQUIRE A STUDENT TO
PARTICIPATE IN TESTING PROVIDED BY PEARSON OR ANY OTHER STATE TESTING
BASED ON COMMON CORE STANDARDS. IT SHALL FURTHER BE UNLAWFUL FOR ANY
SCHOOL DISTRICT TO TAKE PUNITIVE MEASURES AGAINST STUDENTS WHO REFUSE TO
PARTICIPATE IN SUCH TESTING, OR PROVIDE ANY FORM OF INCENTIVE OR REWARD
FOR STUDENTS WHO DO SO PARTICIPATE. SCHOOL DISTRICTS SHALL PROVIDE
STUDENTS WHOSE PARENTS REFUSE TO PERMIT THEIR TESTING PARTICIPATION WITH
AN ALTERNATE EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY DURING SCHEDULED STATE TESTING TIMES.
IT SHALL BE UNLAWFUL FOR SCHOOL DISTRICTS TO REQUIRE SUCH STUDENTS TO BE
PLACED IN A TESTING ROOM OR ENVIRONMENT DURING SCHEDULED STATE TESTING
TIMES OR MAKEUP TIMES. NOTWITHSTANDING THE PROVISIONS OF SUBDIVISION
TWO OF SECTION THREE HUNDRED SIX OF THIS ARTICLE, STATE AID FOR SCHOOLS
SHALL NOT BE CONTINGENT ON OR IN ANY WAY AFFECTED BY THE STUDENT PARTIC-
IPATION RATE FOR TESTING PROVIDED BY PEARSON OR ANY OTHER STATE TESTING
BASED ON COMMON CORE STANDARDS. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER LAW, RULE OR
REGULATION TO THE CONTRARY, SCORE RESULTS ON PEARSON OR ANY OTHER STATE
TESTING BASED ON COMMON CORE STANDARDS SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE GROUNDS OR
BE CONSIDERED AS A FACTOR FOR DETERMINING WHETHER A SCHOOL IS A CHRON-
ICALLY UNDERPERFORMING OR FAILING SCHOOL. NOR SHALL A SCHOOL DISTRICT
GIVE ANY CONSIDERATION TO CLASSROOM PARTICIPATION RATES IN SUCH TESTING
WHEN EVALUATING TEACHER PERFORMANCE OR MAKING PERSONNEL DECISIONS. IT
SHALL LIKEWISE BE UNLAWFUL FOR A SCHOOL DISTRICT TO RE-ALLOCATE FUNDING
AMONG OR BETWEEN SCHOOLS WITHIN SUCH DISTRICT BASED ON STUDENT PARTIC-
IPATION RATES FOR SUCH TESTING.
§ 3. This act shall take effect immediately.