Senate Bill S3686

                                 BILL NUMBER:  S3686

 TITLE OF BILL :  An act to amend the election law, in relation to the
typeface to be used on paper ballots

 PURPOSE :

To make paper ballots more usable by the voting public through
requirements that ballots use a simple and easy to read type, and be
designed with a view towards usability, and by requiring that the
State and New York City boards of elections, as well as those in the
largest counties, have a full time employee on staff who is trained in
ballot design and usability.

 SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS :

Section 1 of the bill amends election law section 7-106(2) to require
that paper ballots use simple and easy to read type style, and that
candidates names be printed in initial capital and lower case letters
of at least 12 point bold type. It further amends election law section
7-106(2) to add a new subdivision 2a, which requires that the New York
State and New York City boards of elections, as well as those in Erie,
Nassau, Suffolk and Westchester counties have one full time employee
on staff who is fully trained in effective ballot design and ballot
usability. It also requires that such employee of the state board of
elections be available to advise the other counties on the proposed
              

design and usability of their ballots for primary, general and special
elections.

Section 2 of the bill establishes the effective date.

 JUSTIFICATION :

Currently, election law section 7-106(2) does not contain any
requirements as to ballot readability or usability, and requires that
candidates' names appear in all capital bold type letters with no
minimum type size, all of which have made many ballots used in New
York City and elsewhere difficult for voters to read and use. With the
introduction of paper ballots statewide in 2010, this problem was
particularly acute. In fact, difficulty reading the ballot, especially
because of small type size, was the single most common complaint
following the 2010 general election.

The U.S. Election Assistance Commission's report on Effective Designs
of Federal Elections, June 2007, Section 3: Optical Scan Ballots, in
its best practices recommendations, includes the specific changes in
the ballot requirements in this amendment to election law section
7-106(2). This report is referred to favorably by the Brennan Center's
2008 report, entitled Better Ballots, which also includes the changes
made by this bill in its "Ballot Design Checklist".

These and other studies all stress the importance of ballot design and
usability, yet, despite their importance to the voters' ability to
successfully select their candidates and cast their ballots, expertise
in ballot design and usability is lacking within our boards of
elections. No additional hiring should be necessary to meet the
requirements for one full-time employee in the State board of
elections, and one in the boards of elections of each of Our largest
counties, to develop the necessary expertise in ballot design and
usability. In fact, such expertise can largely be developed through
self study of the extensive amount of literature in this field, along
with some training courses.

 LEGISLATIVE HISTORY :

2015-1016: S. 2841 - Referred to Senate Elections Committee.
 FISCAL IMPACT ON THE STATE :

None.

 EFFECTIVE DATE :
This act shall take effect on the first day of January next succeeding
the date on which it has become a law.