[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD15978-02-8
S. 8824 2
1-A. CREATION. IN ANY CITY OF A MILLION OR MORE AS HEREINBEFORE OR
HEREAFTER AUTHORIZED SUCH TRIBUNAL WHEN CREATED SHALL BE KNOWN AS THE
PARKING VIOLATIONS BUREAU AND SHALL HAVE JURISDICTION OF TRAFFIC INFRAC-
TIONS WHICH CONSTITUTE A PARKING VIOLATION AND SHALL ADJUDICATE LIABIL-
ITY OF OWNERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH SUBDIVISION (F) OF SECTION ELEVEN
HUNDRED TEN AND SECTION ELEVEN HUNDRED ELEVEN-F OF THIS CHAPTER FOR
VIOLATIONS OF THE TEMPORARY HIGH-OCCUPANCY VEHICLE (HOV) PROGRAM AS
DEFINED IN SUCH SECTION ELEVEN HUNDRED ELEVEN-F. FOR THE PURPOSES OF
THIS ARTICLE, A PARKING VIOLATION IS THE VIOLATION OF ANY LAW, RULE OR
REGULATION PROVIDING FOR OR REGULATING THE PARKING, STOPPING OR STANDING
OF A VEHICLE. IN ADDITION FOR PURPOSES OF THIS ARTICLE, "COMMISSIONER"
SHALL MEAN AND INCLUDE THE COMMISSIONER OF TRAFFIC OF THE CITY OR AN
OFFICIAL POSSESSING AUTHORITY AS SUCH A COMMISSIONER.
§ 4. Section 237 of the vehicle and traffic law is amended by adding a
new subdivision 16 to read as follows:
16. TO ADJUDICATE THE LIABILITY OF OWNERS FOR VIOLATIONS OF SUBDIVI-
SION (F) OF SECTION ELEVEN HUNDRED TEN AND SECTION ELEVEN HUNDRED
ELEVEN-F OF THIS CHAPTER.
§ 5. Subdivision 1 of section 239 of the vehicle and traffic law is
amended by adding a new paragraph f-1 to read as follows:
F-1. "NOTICE OF VIOLATION" MEANS A NOTICE OF VIOLATION AS DEFINED IN
SUBDIVISION NINE OF SECTION TWO HUNDRED THIRTY-SEVEN OF THIS ARTICLE AND
SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO INCLUDE A NOTICE OF LIABILITY ISSUED PURSUANT TO
AUTHORIZATION SET FORTH IN SUBDIVISION (F) OF SECTION ELEVEN HUNDRED TEN
AND SECTION ELEVEN HUNDRED ELEVEN-F OF THIS CHAPTER.
§ 6. Section 240 of the vehicle and traffic law is amended by adding
three new subdivisions 1-b, 1-c and 2-a to read as follows:
1-B. NOTICE OF HEARING. WHENEVER A PERSON ALLEGED TO BE LIABLE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SUBDIVISION (F) OF SECTION ELEVEN
HUNDRED TEN AND SECTION ELEVEN HUNDRED ELEVEN-F OF THIS CHAPTER ENTERS A
PLEA OF NOT GUILTY OR CONTESTS SUCH AN ALLEGATION, THE BUREAU SHALL
ADVISE SUCH PERSON PERSONALLY BY SUCH FORM OF FIRST CLASS MAIL AS THE
DIRECTOR MAY DIRECT OF THE DATE ON WHICH HE OR SHE MUST APPEAR TO ANSWER
THE CHARGE AT A HEARING. THE FORM AND CONTENT OF SUCH NOTICE OF HEARING
SHALL BE PRESCRIBED BY THE DIRECTOR, AND SHALL CONTAIN A WARNING TO
ADVISE THE PERSON SO PLEADING OR CONTESTING THAT FAILURE TO APPEAR ON
THE DATE DESIGNATED, OR ON ANY SUBSEQUENT ADJOURNED DATE, SHALL BE
DEEMED AN ADMISSION OF LIABILITY, AND THAT A DEFAULT JUDGMENT MAY BE
ENTERED THEREON.
1-C. FINES AND PENALTIES. WHENEVER A PLEA OF NOT GUILTY HAS BEEN
ENTERED, OR THE BUREAU HAS BEEN NOTIFIED THAT AN ALLEGATION OF LIABILITY
IN ACCORDANCE WITH SUBDIVISION (F) OF SECTION ELEVEN HUNDRED TEN AND
SECTION ELEVEN HUNDRED ELEVEN-F OF THIS CHAPTER IS BEING CONTESTED, BY A
PERSON IN A TIMELY FASHION AND A HEARING ON THE MERITS HAS BEEN
DEMANDED, BUT HAS NOT YET BEEN HELD, THE BUREAU SHALL NOT ISSUE ANY
NOTICE OF FINE OR PENALTY TO THAT PERSON PRIOR TO THE DATE OF THE HEAR-
ING.
2-A. CONDUCT OF HEARINGS. A. EVERY HEARING FOR AN ADJUDICATION OF AN
ALLEGATION OF LIABILITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SUBDIVISION (F) OF SECTION
ELEVEN HUNDRED TEN AND SECTION ELEVEN HUNDRED ELEVEN-F OF THIS CHAPTER
SHALL BE HELD BEFORE A HEARING EXAMINER IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULES AND
REGULATIONS PROMULGATED BY THE BUREAU.
B. NO CHARGE MAY BE ESTABLISHED EXCEPT UPON PROOF BY SUBSTANTIAL
EVIDENCE.
S. 8824 3
C. THE HEARING EXAMINER SHALL NOT BE BOUND BY THE RULES OF EVIDENCE IN
THE CONDUCT OF THE HEARING, EXCEPT RULES RELATING TO PRIVILEGED COMMUNI-
CATIONS.
D. THE HEARING EXAMINER SHALL AT THE REQUEST OF THE PERSON CHARGED ON
A SHOWING OF GOOD CAUSE AND NEED THEREFOR, OR IN HIS OR HER OWN
DISCRETION, ISSUE A SUBPOENA TO COMPEL THE APPEARANCE AT A HEARING OF
THE OFFICER WHO SERVED THE NOTICE OF VIOLATION OR OF OTHER PERSONS TO
GIVE TESTIMONY, AND MAY ISSUE A SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM TO COMPEL THE
PRODUCTION FOR EXAMINATION OR INTRODUCTION INTO EVIDENCE, OF ANY BOOK,
PAPER OR OTHER THING RELEVANT TO THE CHARGES.
E. IN THE CASE OF A REFUSAL TO OBEY A SUBPOENA, THE BUREAU MAY MAKE
APPLICATION TO THE SUPREME COURT PURSUANT TO SECTION TWENTY-THREE
HUNDRED EIGHT OF THE CIVIL PRACTICE LAW AND RULES, FOR AN ORDER REQUIR-
ING SUCH APPEARANCE, TESTIMONY OR PRODUCTION OF EVIDENCE.
F. THE HEARING EXAMINER SHALL NOT EXAMINE THE PRIOR VIOLATION RECORD
OF A PERSON CHARGED BEFORE MAKING A DETERMINATION.
G. A RECORD SHALL BE MADE OF A HEARING ON A PLEA OF NOT GUILTY OR OF A
HEARING AT WHICH LIABILITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SUBDIVISION (F) OF SECTION
ELEVEN HUNDRED TEN AND SECTION ELEVEN HUNDRED ELEVEN-F OF THIS CHAPTER
IS CONTESTED. RECORDING DEVICES MAY BE USED FOR THE MAKING OF THE
RECORD.
§ 7. Section 241 of the vehicle and traffic law is amended by adding
two new subdivisions 1-a and 2-a to read as follows:
1-A. THE HEARING EXAMINER SHALL MAKE A DETERMINATION ON THE CHARGES,
EITHER SUSTAINING OR DISMISSING THEM. WHERE THE HEARING EXAMINER DETER-
MINES THAT THE CHARGES HAVE BEEN SUSTAINED HE OR SHE MAY EXAMINE EITHER
THE PRIOR PARKING VIOLATIONS RECORD OR THE RECORD OF LIABILITIES
INCURRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ENFORCEMENT OF SUBDIVISION (F) OF SECTION
ELEVEN HUNDRED TEN AND SECTION ELEVEN HUNDRED ELEVEN-F OF THIS CHAPTER
OF THE PERSON CHARGED PRIOR TO RENDERING A FINAL DETERMINATION. FINAL
DETERMINATIONS SUSTAINING OR DISMISSING CHARGES SHALL BE ENTERED ON A
FINAL DETERMINATION ROLL MAINTAINED BY THE BUREAU TOGETHER WITH RECORDS
SHOWING PAYMENT AND NONPAYMENT OF PENALTIES.
2-A. WHERE AN OPERATOR OR OWNER FAILS TO ENTER A PLEA TO OR CONTEST AN
ALLEGATION OF LIABILITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SUBDIVISION (F) OF SECTION
ELEVEN HUNDRED TEN AND SECTION ELEVEN HUNDRED ELEVEN-F OF THIS CHAPTER
OR FAILS TO APPEAR ON A DESIGNATED HEARING DATE OR SUBSEQUENT ADJOURNED
DATE OR FAILS AFTER A HEARING TO COMPLY WITH THE DETERMINATION OF A
HEARING EXAMINER, AS PRESCRIBED BY THIS ARTICLE OR BY RULE OR REGULATION
OF THE BUREAU, SUCH FAILURE TO PLEAD, APPEAR OR COMPLY SHALL BE DEEMED,
FOR ALL PURPOSES, AN ADMISSION OF LIABILITY AND SHALL BE GROUNDS FOR
RENDERING AND ENTERING A DEFAULT JUDGMENT IN AN AMOUNT PROVIDED BY THE
RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE BUREAU. HOWEVER, AFTER THE EXPIRATION OF
THE ORIGINAL DATE PRESCRIBED FOR ENTERING A PLEA AND BEFORE A DEFAULT
JUDGMENT MAY BE RENDERED, IN SUCH CASE THE BUREAU SHALL PURSUANT TO THE
APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF LAW NOTIFY SUCH OPERATOR OR OWNER, BY SUCH FORM
OF FIRST CLASS MAIL AS THE COMMISSION MAY DIRECT: (1) OF THE VIOLATION
CHARGED OR LIABILITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SUBDIVISION (F) OF SECTION ELEV-
EN HUNDRED TEN AND SECTION ELEVEN HUNDRED ELEVEN-F OF THIS CHAPTER
ALLEGED, (2) OF THE IMPENDING DEFAULT JUDGMENT, (3) THAT SUCH JUDGMENT
WILL BE ENTERED IN THE CIVIL COURT OF THE CITY IN WHICH THE BUREAU HAS
BEEN ESTABLISHED, OR OTHER COURT OF CIVIL JURISDICTION OR ANY OTHER
PLACE PROVIDED FOR THE ENTRY OF CIVIL JUDGMENTS WITHIN THE STATE OF NEW
YORK, AND (4) THAT A DEFAULT MAY BE AVOIDED BY ENTERING A PLEA OR
CONTESTING AN ALLEGATION OF LIABILITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION ELEVEN
HUNDRED ELEVEN-F OF THIS CHAPTER OR MAKING AN APPEARANCE WITHIN THIRTY
S. 8824 4
DAYS OF THE SENDING OF SUCH NOTICE. PLEAS ENTERED WITHIN THAT PERIOD
SHALL BE IN THE MANNER PRESCRIBED IN THE NOTICE AND NOT SUBJECT TO ADDI-
TIONAL PENALTY OR FEE. SUCH NOTICE OF IMPENDING DEFAULT JUDGMENT SHALL
NOT BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO THE RENDERING AND ENTRY THEREOF IN THE CASE OF
OPERATORS OR OWNERS WHO ARE NON-RESIDENTS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. IN
NO CASE SHALL A DEFAULT JUDGMENT BE RENDERED OR, WHERE REQUIRED, A
NOTICE OF IMPENDING DEFAULT JUDGMENT BE SENT, MORE THAN TWO YEARS AFTER
THE EXPIRATION OF THE TIME PRESCRIBED FOR ENTERING A PLEA. WHEN A PERSON
HAS DEMANDED A HEARING, NO FINE OR PENALTY SHALL BE IMPOSED FOR ANY
REASON PRIOR TO THE HOLDING OF THE HEARING. IF THE HEARING EXAMINER
SHALL MAKE A DETERMINATION ON THE CHARGES, SUSTAINING THEM, HE OR SHE
SHALL IMPOSE NO GREATER PENALTY OR FINE THAN THOSE UPON WHICH THE PERSON
WAS ORIGINALLY CHARGED.
§ 8. Subdivision 5-a of section 401 of the vehicle and traffic law is
amended by adding a new paragraph a-1 to read as follows:
A-1. IF AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION FOR A REGISTRATION OR RENEWAL THER-
EOF THERE IS A CERTIFICATION FROM A COURT OR ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL OF
APPROPRIATE JURISDICTION THAT THE REGISTRANT OR HIS OR HER REPRESEN-
TATIVE FAILED TO APPEAR ON THE RETURN DATE OR ANY SUBSEQUENT ADJOURNED
DATE OR FAILED TO COMPLY WITH THE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF AN ADMINIS-
TRATIVE TRIBUNAL FOLLOWING ENTRY OF A FINAL DECISION IN RESPONSE TO A
TOTAL OF THREE OR MORE SUMMONSES OR OTHER PROCESS IN THE AGGREGATE,
ISSUED WITHIN AN EIGHTEEN-MONTH PERIOD, CHARGING THAT THE REGISTRANT WAS
LIABLE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SUBDIVISION (F) OF SECTION ELEVEN HUNDRED TEN
AND SECTION ELEVEN HUNDRED ELEVEN-F OF THIS CHAPTER FOR A VIOLATION OF
THE TEMPORARY HIGH-OCCUPANCY VEHICLE (HOV) PROGRAM AS DEFINED IN SUCH
SECTION ELEVEN HUNDRED ELEVEN-F, THE COMMISSIONER OR HIS OR HER AGENT
SHALL DENY THE REGISTRATION OR RENEWAL APPLICATION UNTIL THE APPLICANT
PROVIDES PROOF FROM THE COURT OR ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL WHEREIN THE
CHARGES ARE PENDING THAT AN APPEARANCE OR ANSWER HAS BEEN MADE OR IN THE
CASE OF AN ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL THAT HE OR SHE HAS COMPLIED WITH THE
RULES AND REGULATIONS OF SAID TRIBUNAL FOLLOWING ENTRY OF A FINAL DECI-
SION. WHERE AN APPLICATION IS DENIED PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION, THE
COMMISSIONER MAY, IN HIS OR HER DISCRETION, DENY A REGISTRATION OR
RENEWAL APPLICATION TO ANY OTHER PERSON FOR THE SAME VEHICLE AND MAY
DENY A REGISTRATION OR RENEWAL APPLICATION FOR ANY OTHER MOTOR VEHICLE
REGISTERED IN THE NAME OF THE APPLICANT WHERE THE COMMISSIONER HAS
DETERMINED THAT SUCH REGISTRANT'S INTENT HAS BEEN TO EVADE THE PURPOSES
OF THIS SUBDIVISION AND WHERE THE COMMISSIONER HAS REASONABLE GROUNDS TO
BELIEVE THAT SUCH REGISTRATION OR RENEWAL WILL HAVE THE EFFECT DEFEATING
THE PURPOSES OF THIS SUBDIVISION. SUCH DENIAL SHALL ONLY REMAIN IN
EFFECT AS LONG AS THE SUMMONSES REMAIN UNANSWERED, OR IN THE CASE OF AN
ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, THE REGISTRANT FAILS TO COMPLY WITH THE RULES
AND REGULATIONS FOLLOWING ENTRY OF A FINAL DECISION.
§ 9. Section 1110 of the vehicle and traffic law is amended by adding
a new subdivision (f) to read as follows:
(F) EVERY PERSON SHALL OBEY THE INSTRUCTIONS OF ANY OFFICIAL TRAFFIC-
CONTROL DEVICE PLACED TO DELINEATE HIGH-OCCUPANCY VEHICLE LANE
RESTRICTIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION ELEVEN HUNDRED ELEVEN-F OF THIS CHAP-
TER, UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY A TRAFFIC OR POLICE OFFICER, SUBJECT
TO THE EXCEPTIONS GRANTED THE DRIVER OF AN AUTHORIZED EMERGENCY VEHICLE
IN THIS TITLE.
§ 10. The vehicle and traffic law is amended by adding a new section
1111-f to read as follows:
§ 1111-F. OWNER LIABILITY FOR FAILURE OF OPERATOR TO COMPLY WITH
TEMPORARY HIGH-OCCUPANCY VEHICLE PROGRAM RESTRICTIONS. (A) 1. NOTWITH-
S. 8824 5
STANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF LAW, THE CITY OF NEW YORK IN CONSULTA-
TION WITH THE METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY IS HEREBY AUTHORIZED
AND EMPOWERED TO ESTABLISH A TEMPORARY HIGH-OCCUPANCY VEHICLE (HOV)
PROGRAM ON THE WILLIAMSBURG BRIDGE. SUCH PROGRAM WILL IMPOSE MONETARY
LIABILITY ON THE OWNER OF A VEHICLE FOR FAILURE OF AN OPERATOR THEREOF
TO COMPLY WITH HOV RESTRICTIONS IN SUCH CITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION. THE NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTA-
TION, FOR PURPOSES OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SUCH PROGRAM, SHALL OPERATE
HOV PHOTO DEVICES ONLY WITHIN DESIGNATED HOV AREAS ON THE WILLIAMSBURG
BRIDGE IN SUCH CITY. SUCH HOV PHOTO DEVICES SHALL BE STATIONARY AND
SHALL BE ACTIVATED AT LOCATIONS DETERMINED BY SUCH DEPARTMENT.
2. ANY IMAGE PRODUCED BY AN HOV PHOTO DEVICE SHALL NOT BE USED FOR ANY
PURPOSE OTHER THAN AS SPECIFIED IN THIS SECTION IN THE ABSENCE OF A
COURT ORDER REQUIRING SUCH IMAGE TO BE PRODUCED.
3. THE CITY OF NEW YORK SHALL ADOPT AND ENFORCE MEASURES TO PROTECT
THE PRIVACY OF DRIVERS, PASSENGERS, PEDESTRIANS AND CYCLISTS WHOSE IDEN-
TITY AND IDENTIFYING INFORMATION MAY BE CAPTURED BY AN HOV PHOTO DEVICE,
PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT NO NOTICE OF LIABILITY ISSUED PURSUANT TO THIS
SECTION SHALL BE DISMISSED SOLELY BECAUSE AN IMAGE PRODUCED BY AN HOV
PHOTO DEVICE ALLOWS FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF THE DRIVER, THE PASSEN-
GERS, OR THE CONTENTS OF A VEHICLE. SUCH PROTECTIVE MEASURES SHALL
INCLUDE:
(I) A PROHIBITION ON THE USE OR DISSEMINATION OF VEHICLES' LICENSE
PLATE INFORMATION AND OTHER INFORMATION AND IMAGES CAPTURED BY HOV PHOTO
DEVICES EXCEPT: (A) AS REQUIRED TO ESTABLISH LIABILITY UNDER THIS
SECTION OR COLLECT PAYMENT OF PENALTIES; (B) AS REQUIRED BY COURT ORDER;
(C) AS REQUIRED PURSUANT TO A SEARCH WARRANT ISSUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW OR A SUBPOENA; OR (D) AS OTHERWISE REQUIRED
BY LAW;
(II) THE INSTALLATION OF SIGNAGE IN ADVANCE OF ENTRY POINTS TO DESIG-
NATED HOV AREAS STATING THAT HOV PHOTO DEVICES ARE USED TO ENFORCE HOV
RESTRICTIONS; AND
(III) OVERSIGHT PROCEDURES TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE AFOREMEN-
TIONED PRIVACY PROTECTION MEASURES.
4. WITHIN THE CITY OF NEW YORK, SUCH HOV PHOTO DEVICES USED IN ACCORD-
ANCE WITH THE TEMPORARY HOV PROGRAM SHALL ONLY BE OPERATED WITHIN DESIG-
NATED HOV AREAS ON THE WILLIAMSBURG BRIDGE DURING PERIODS TO BE DETER-
MINED BY THE NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION IN CONSULTATION
WITH THE METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY IN ORDER TO FACILITATE
TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT. DETERMINATION OF SUCH PERIODS SHALL BE MADE BASED ON
FACTORS THAT INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO, EMPIRICAL TRAFFIC ANALYSES
CONDUCTED BY SUCH DEPARTMENT, INPUT FROM THE PUBLIC, AND GUIDANCE FROM
APPROPRIATE GOVERNMENT ENTITIES REGARDING MITIGATION STRATEGIES.
(B) IF THE CITY OF NEW YORK HAS ESTABLISHED A TEMPORARY HOV PROGRAM
PURSUANT TO SUBDIVISION (A) OF THIS SECTION, THE OWNER OF A VEHICLE
SHALL BE LIABLE FOR A PENALTY IMPOSED PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION IF SUCH
VEHICLE WAS USED OR OPERATED WITH THE PERMISSION OF THE OWNER, EXPRESS
OR IMPLIED, IN VIOLATION OF ANY HOV RESTRICTIONS THAT APPLY, AND SUCH
VIOLATION IS EVIDENCED BY INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM A HOV PHOTO DEVICE;
PROVIDED HOWEVER THAT NO OWNER OF A VEHICLE SHALL BE LIABLE FOR A PENAL-
TY IMPOSED PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION WHERE THE OPERATOR OF SUCH VEHICLE
HAS BEEN CONVICTED OF THE UNDERLYING VIOLATION OF ANY HOV RESTRICTIONS.
(C) FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, THE FOLLOWING TERMS SHALL HAVE THE
FOLLOWING MEANINGS:
1. "OWNER" SHALL HAVE THE MEANING PROVIDED IN ARTICLE TWO-B OF THIS
CHAPTER.
S. 8824 6
2. "HIGH-OCCUPANCY VEHICLE" OR "HOV" SHALL MEAN VEHICLES WITH THREE OR
MORE OCCUPANTS.
3. "HOV PHOTO DEVICE" SHALL MEAN A DEVICE THAT IS CAPABLE OF OPERATING
INDEPENDENTLY OF AN ENFORCEMENT OFFICER AND PRODUCES ONE OR MORE IMAGES
OF EACH VEHICLE AT THE TIME IT IS IN VIOLATION OF HOV RESTRICTIONS.
4. "HOV RESTRICTIONS" SHALL MEAN RESTRICTIONS, WITHIN THE TEMPORARY
HOV PROGRAM, ON THE USE OF DESIGNATED AREAS OF THE WILLIAMSBURG BRIDGE,
DURING TIME PERIODS TO BE DEFINED BY THE NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION, BY A VEHICLE OTHER THAN: (I) AN HOV; (II) A VEHICLE
REGISTERED AS A COMMERCIAL VEHICLE PURSUANT TO PART ONE HUNDRED SIX OF
TITLE FIFTEEN OF THE NEW YORK CODES, RULES AND REGULATIONS; (III) AN
AUTHORIZED EMERGENCY VEHICLE; (IV) AN ACCESS-A-RIDE VEHICLE AS DEFINED
IN CHAPTER FIVE OF TITLE THIRTY-FOUR OF THE RULES OF THE CITY OF NEW
YORK; OR (V) A BUS.
5. "TEMPORARY HOV PROGRAM" SHALL MEAN A TEMPORARY PROGRAM THAT OPER-
ATES EXCLUSIVELY WITHIN DESIGNATED HOV AREAS ON THE WILLIAMSBURG BRIDGE
DURING PERIODS OF HIGH-TRAFFIC VOLUME TO BE DETERMINED BY THE NEW YORK
CITY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. DETERMINATION OF SUCH PERIODS SHALL
BE MADE BASED ON FACTORS THAT INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO, EMPIRICAL
TRAFFIC ANALYSES CONDUCTED BY SUCH DEPARTMENT, INPUT FROM THE PUBLIC,
AND GUIDANCE FROM APPROPRIATE GOVERNMENT ENTITIES REGARDING MITIGATION
STRATEGIES.
(D) A CERTIFICATE, SWORN TO OR AFFIRMED BY A TECHNICIAN EMPLOYED BY
THE CITY OF NEW YORK, OR A FACSIMILE THEREOF, BASED UPON INSPECTION OF
PHOTOGRAPHS, MICROPHOTOGRAPHS, VIDEOTAPE OR OTHER RECORDED IMAGES
PRODUCED BY AN HOV PHOTO DEVICE, SHALL BE PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE OF THE
FACTS CONTAINED THEREIN. SUBJECT TO PARAGRAPH THREE OF SUBDIVISION (G)
OF THIS SECTION, ANY PHOTOGRAPHS, MICROPHOTOGRAPHS, VIDEOTAPE OR OTHER
RECORDED IMAGES EVIDENCING SUCH A VIOLATION SHALL BE AVAILABLE FOR
INSPECTION IN ANY PROCEEDING TO ADJUDICATE THE LIABILITY FOR SUCH
VIOLATION PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION.
(E) AN OWNER LIABLE FOR A VIOLATION OF AN HOV RESTRICTION IMPOSED ON
THE WILLIAMSBURG BRIDGE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TEMPORARY HOV PROGRAM
SHALL BE LIABLE FOR MONETARY PENALTIES IN ACCORDANCE WITH A SCHEDULE OF
FINES AND PENALTIES PROMULGATED BY THE PARKING VIOLATIONS BUREAU OF THE
CITY OF NEW YORK; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT THE MONETARY PENALTY FOR
VIOLATING AN HOV RESTRICTION SHALL NOT EXCEED THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS;
PROVIDED, FURTHER, THAN AN OWNER SHALL BE LIABLE FOR AN ADDITIONAL
PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED TWENTY-FIVE DOLLARS FOR EACH VIOLATION FOR THE
FAILURE TO RESPOND TO A NOTICE OF LIABILITY WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME
PERIOD. ALL MONETARY PENALTIES IMPOSED BY THIS SECTION SHALL, WITHIN
THE FIRST TEN DAYS OF THE MONTH NEXT SUCCEEDING THE COLLECTION OF SUCH
PENALTIES, BE PAID BY THE COLLECTING AUTHORITY TO THE STATE COMPTROLLER
TO BE DEPOSITED IN THE OUTER BOROUGH TRANSPORTATION ACCOUNT OF THE NEW
YORK CITY TRANSPORTATION ASSISTANCE FUND ESTABLISHED BY PARAGRAPH (II)
OF SUBDIVISION 1 OF SECTION TWELVE HUNDRED SEVENTY-I OF THE PUBLIC
AUTHORITIES LAW.
(F) AN IMPOSITION OF LIABILITY PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION SHALL NOT BE
DEEMED A CONVICTION OF AN OPERATOR AND SHALL NOT BE MADE PART OF THE
OPERATING RECORD OF THE PERSON UPON WHOM SUCH LIABILITY IS IMPOSED, NOR
SHALL IT BE USED FOR INSURANCE PURPOSES IN THE PROVISION OF MOTOR VEHI-
CLE INSURANCE COVERAGE.
(G) 1. A NOTICE OF LIABILITY SHALL BE SENT BY FIRST CLASS MAIL TO EACH
PERSON ALLEGED TO BE LIABLE AS AN OWNER FOR A VIOLATION OF THE TEMPORARY
HOV PROGRAM. PERSONAL DELIVERY TO THE OWNER SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED. A
S. 8824 7
MANUAL OR AUTOMATIC RECORD OF MAILING PREPARED IN THE ORDINARY COURSE OF
BUSINESS SHALL BE PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE OF THE FACTS CONTAINED THEREIN.
2. A NOTICE OF LIABILITY SHALL CONTAIN THE NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE
PERSON ALLEGED TO BE LIABLE AS AN OWNER FOR A VIOLATION OF THE TEMPORARY
HOV PROGRAM, THE REGISTRATION NUMBER OF THE VEHICLE INVOLVED IN SUCH
VIOLATION, THE LOCATION WHERE SUCH VIOLATION TOOK PLACE, ONE OR MORE
IMAGES IDENTIFYING THE VIOLATION, THE DATE AND TIME OF SUCH VIOLATION
AND THE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER OF THE HOV PHOTO DEVICE WHICH RECORDED THE
VIOLATION OR OTHER DOCUMENT LOCATOR NUMBER.
3. THE NOTICE OF LIABILITY SHALL CONTAIN INFORMATION ADVISING THE
PERSON CHARGED OF THE MANNER AND THE TIME IN WHICH HE OR SHE MAY CONTEST
THE LIABILITY ALLEGED IN THE NOTICE. SUCH NOTICE OF LIABILITY SHALL ALSO
CONTAIN A WARNING TO ADVISE THE PERSON CHARGED THAT FAILURE TO CONTEST
IN THE MANNER AND TIME PROVIDED SHALL BE DEEMED AN ADMISSION OF LIABIL-
ITY AND THAT A DEFAULT JUDGMENT MAY BE ENTERED THEREON.
4. THE NOTICE OF LIABILITY SHALL BE PREPARED AND MAILED BY THE AGENCY
OR AGENCIES DESIGNATED BY THE CITY OF NEW YORK, OR ANY OTHER ENTITY
AUTHORIZED BY SUCH CITY TO PREPARE AND MAIL SUCH NOTIFICATION OF
VIOLATION.
5. ADJUDICATION OF THE LIABILITY IMPOSED UPON OWNERS BY THIS SECTION
SHALL BE BY THE NEW YORK CITY PARKING VIOLATIONS BUREAU.
(H) IF AN OWNER OF A VEHICLE RECEIVES A NOTICE OF LIABILITY PURSUANT
TO THIS SECTION FOR ANY TIME PERIOD DURING WHICH SUCH VEHICLE WAS
REPORTED TO THE POLICE DEPARTMENT AS HAVING BEEN STOLEN, IT SHALL BE A
VALID DEFENSE TO AN ALLEGATION OF LIABILITY FOR A VIOLATION OF THE
TEMPORARY HOV PROGRAM THAT THE VEHICLE HAD BEEN REPORTED TO THE POLICE
AS STOLEN PRIOR TO THE TIME THE VIOLATION OCCURRED AND HAD NOT BEEN
RECOVERED BY SUCH TIME. FOR PURPOSES OF ASSERTING THE DEFENSE PROVIDED
BY THIS SUBDIVISION IT SHALL BE SUFFICIENT THAT A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE
POLICE REPORT ON THE STOLEN VEHICLE BE SENT BY FIRST CLASS MAIL TO THE
PARKING VIOLATIONS BUREAU OF SUCH CITY.
(I) 1. AN OWNER WHO IS A LESSOR OF A VEHICLE TO WHICH A NOTICE OF
LIABILITY WAS ISSUED PURSUANT TO SUBDIVISION (G) OF THIS SECTION SHALL
NOT BE LIABLE FOR THE VIOLATION OF THE TEMPORARY HOV PROGRAM, PROVIDED
THAT:
(I) PRIOR TO THE VIOLATION, THE LESSOR HAS FILED WITH SUCH PARKING
VIOLATIONS BUREAU IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF PARAGRAPH F-ONE
OF SUBDIVISION ONE OF SECTION TWO HUNDRED THIRTY-NINE OF THIS CHAPTER;
AND
(II) WITHIN THIRTY-SEVEN DAYS AFTER RECEIVING NOTICE FROM SUCH BUREAU
OF THE DATE AND TIME OF A LIABILITY, TOGETHER WITH THE OTHER INFORMATION
CONTAINED IN THE ORIGINAL NOTICE OF LIABILITY, THE LESSOR SUBMITS TO
SUCH BUREAU THE CORRECT NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE LESSEE OF THE VEHICLE
IDENTIFIED IN THE NOTICE OF LIABILITY AT THE TIME OF SUCH VIOLATION,
TOGETHER WITH SUCH OTHER ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE RENTAL,
LEASE OR OTHER CONTRACT DOCUMENT, AS MAY BE REASONABLY REQUIRED BY SUCH
BUREAU PURSUANT TO REGULATIONS THAT MAY BE PROMULGATED FOR SUCH PURPOSE.
2. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH SUBPARAGRAPH (II) OF PARAGRAPH ONE OF THIS
SUBDIVISION SHALL RENDER THE LESSOR LIABLE FOR THE PENALTY PRESCRIBED IN
THIS SECTION.
3. WHERE THE LESSOR COMPLIES WITH THE PROVISIONS OF PARAGRAPH ONE OF
THIS SUBDIVISION, THE LESSEE OF SUCH VEHICLE ON THE DATE OF SUCH
VIOLATION SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE THE OWNER OF SUCH VEHICLE FOR PURPOSES
OF THIS SECTION, SHALL BE SUBJECT TO LIABILITY FOR SUCH VIOLATION PURSU-
ANT TO THIS SECTION, AND SHALL BE SENT A NOTICE OF LIABILITY PURSUANT TO
SUBDIVISION (G) OF THIS SECTION.
S. 8824 8
(J) IF THE OWNER LIABLE FOR A VIOLATION OF THE TEMPORARY HOV PROGRAM
WAS NOT THE OPERATOR OF THE VEHICLE AT THE TIME OF THE VIOLATION, THE
OWNER MAY MAINTAIN AN ACTION FOR INDEMNIFICATION AGAINST THE OPERATOR.
(K) NOTHING IN THIS SECTION SHALL BE CONSTRUED TO LIMIT THE LIABILITY
OF AN OPERATOR OF A VEHICLE FOR ANY VIOLATION OF HOV RESTRICTIONS.
(L) ON AND AFTER THE DATE OF RESTORATION OF REGULAR SUBWAY PASSENGER
SERVICE IN THE CANARSIE TUNNEL, THE CITY OF NEW YORK SHALL NOT BE
AUTHORIZED OR EMPOWERED TO ESTABLISH OR CONTINUE A TEMPORARY HOV PROGRAM
ON THE WILLIAMSBURG BRIDGE PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH ONE OF SUBDIVISION (A)
OF THIS SECTION; PROVIDED THAT ANY VIOLATIONS ISSUED PRIOR TO SUCH DATE
MAY BE ADJUDICATED AFTER SUCH DATE. ON AND AFTER THE DATE OF RESTORATION
OF REGULAR SUBWAY PASSENGER SERVICE IN THE CANARSIE TUNNEL, THE NEW YORK
CITY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SHALL NOT BE AUTHORIZED TO OPERATE HOV
PHOTO DEVICES PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH ONE OF SUBDIVISION (A) OF THIS
SECTION; PROVIDED THAT ANY VIOLATIONS ISSUED PRIOR TO SUCH DATE MAY BE
ADJUDICATED AFTER SUCH DATE.
§ 11. Section 1809-e of the vehicle traffic law is amended by adding a
new subdivision 4 to read as follows:
4. THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION AUTHORIZING THE IMPOSITION OF A
SURCHARGE SHALL NOT APPLY TO ADJUDICATIONS CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
SECTION ELEVEN HUNDRED ELEVEN-F OF THIS CHAPTER.
§ 12. Subdivision 2 of section 87 of the public officers law is
amended by adding a new paragraph (p) to read as follows:
(P) ARE PHOTOGRAPHS, MICROPHOTOGRAPHS, VIDEOTAPE OR OTHER RECORDED
IMAGES PREPARED UNDER AUTHORITY OF SECTION ELEVEN HUNDRED ELEVEN-F OF
THE VEHICLE AND TRAFFIC LAW.
§ 13. The New York city department of transportation shall: (i) prior
to implementing a temporary high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) program on the
Williamsburg bridge as authorized by section 1111-f of the vehicle and
traffic law, as added by section ten of this act, and in consultation
with the metropolitan transportation authority, in accordance with
subdivision 4 of section 1268 of the public authorities law, as added by
section one of this act, communicate to the public, including the
affected communities in New York and Kings counties, the plan for HOV
restrictions so as to maximize awareness of such temporary HOV program;
(ii) for at least 40 days prior to implementing such temporary HOV
program, send by first class mail notice of such upcoming implementation
to the owner of any vehicle that is not a bus, a commercial vehicle, an
authorized emergency vehicle, or an access-a-ride vehicle, identified as
having been driven on the Williamsburg bridge with fewer than three
occupants during time periods defined by the New York city department of
transportation in accordance with the provisions of section 1111-f of
the vehicle and traffic law, as added by section ten of this act; and
(iii) take such measures as are necessary to implement such temporary
HOV program prior to its implementation, including promulgating any
rules and regulations necessary for the implementation of this act.
Failure to comply with the provisions of this section shall not affect
the validity or implementation of the temporary HOV program authorized
by section 1111-f of the vehicle and traffic law, as added by section
ten of this act.
§ 14. (a) This act shall take effect immediately; provided, however,
that sections one through twelve of this act shall take effect April 1,
2019, and shall expire six months after the metropolitan transportation
authority restores regular subway passenger service in the Canarsie
tunnel, or April 1, 2021, whichever is earlier, when upon such date the
provisions of this act shall be deemed repealed; provided that the New
S. 8824 9
York city department of transportation shall notify the legislative bill
drafting commission upon the occurrence of such restoration in order
that the commission may maintain an accurate and timely effective data-
base of the official text of the laws of the state of New York in furth-
erance of effectuating the provisions of section 44 of the legislative
law and section 70-b of the public officers law.
(b) On and after the date the metropolitan transportation authority
restores regular subway passenger service in the Canarsie tunnel, or
April 1, 2021, whichever is earlier, the city of New York shall not be
authorized or empowered to establish or continue a temporary HOV program
on the Williamsburg bridge pursuant to paragraph 1 of subdivision (a) of
section 1111-f of the vehicle and traffic law, as added by section ten
of this act. On and after the date of restoration of regular subway
passenger service in the Canarsie tunnel, or April 1, 2021, whichever is
earlier, the New York city department of transportation shall not be
authorized to operate HOV photo devices pursuant to paragraph 1 of
subdivision (a) of section 1111-f of the vehicle and traffic law, as
added by section ten of this act.
(c) Notwithstanding the expiration and repeal of certain provisions of
this act, any violations issued prior to the date of restoration of
regular subway passenger service in the Canarsie tunnel may be adjudi-
cated after such date.