S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________
11057
I N A S S E M B L Y
October 7, 2020
___________
Introduced by COMMITTEE ON RULES -- (at request of M. of A. Thiele) --
read once and referred to the Committee on Local Governments
AN ACT making an appropriation to the East End Supervisors and Mayors
Association for a feasibility study update relating to the creation of
Peconic county
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Legislature hereby finds that the creation of Peconic
county from the towns of East Hampton, Riverhead, Shelter Island, South-
ampton, and Southold, from the existing county of Suffolk, would estab-
lish New York state's 63rd county.
The territory proposed to become Peconic county has a population of
136,793 or 9.2% of Suffolk county's population. The territory which
would become Peconic county makes up 45.7% of the real property tax base
of Suffolk county. It is estimated the territory pays about 15% of the
sales tax. If Peconic county were created, it would have a population
larger than 40 of New York State's 57 counties, outside of the city of
New York.
The territory proposed to be Peconic county is largely rural and exur-
ban. The economic base of this region remains largely agriculture, fish-
ing, second homes, and tourism. In contrast, western Suffolk is suburban
with a much more commercial and industrial based economy. The population
density of the west is more than six times that of the proposed Peconic
county. As a result of the long narrow geography of Suffolk and the
different demographics of east and west, Suffolk county current main-
tains three separate county centers in Hauppauge, Yaphank, and River-
head.
In 1994, this legislature appropriated fifty thousand dollars towards
the preparation of a Peconic county feasibility study. In 1995, "Peconic
County Financial Feasibility Study" was issued. The study concluded that
Peconic county was financially feasible. Specifically, the study
concluded that real property taxes could be reduced by 50% in the new
county with the same level or better services. Any financial impact to
remaining Suffolk county would be minimal.
EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD17293-01-0
A. 11057 2
In 1996, a referendum was held in the territory proposed to be Peconic
county which requested that the legislature provide for a binding refer-
endum on the question of the creation of Peconic county. That referendum
passed by a margin of 71% to 29%. However, no binding referendum was
ever held.
The legislature wishes to pursue measures which could improve the
delivery of governmental services at a reduced cost. The Peconic County
Financial Feasibility Study must be updated in order to make an informed
assessment of the financial impact of a new county.
It is the purpose of this act to update the feasibility of creating
Peconic county. The study would be undertaken by the East End Supervi-
sors and Mayors Association.
§ 2. The sum of two hundred thousand dollars ($200,000), or so much
thereof as may be necessary, is hereby appropriated in the fiscal year
2020-2021 to the East End Supervisors and Mayors Association, out of the
moneys in the state treasury in the general fund to the credit of the
local assistance account, not otherwise appropriated, and made imme-
diately available for the update of a financial feasibility study of the
creation of Peconic county. Such moneys shall be payable on the audit
and warrant of the comptroller on vouchers certified or approved by the
department of state in the manner prescribed by law.
§ 3. This act shall take effect immediately.