S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________
6606
2019-2020 Regular Sessions
I N A S S E M B L Y
March 14, 2019
___________
Introduced by M. of A. CRESPO -- read once and referred to the Committee
on Consumer Affairs and Protection
AN ACT to amend the general business law, in relation to the price goug-
ing of pharmaceuticals
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The general business law is amended by adding a new section
396-rrr to read as follows:
§ 396-RRR. PRICE GOUGING; PHARMACEUTICALS. 1. FOR THE PURPOSES OF
THIS SECTION, "PHARMACEUTICALS" SHALL MEAN ANY COMPOUND MANUFACTURED FOR
SALE AS A MEDICINAL DRUG.
2. NO MANUFACTURER OR WHOLESALER OF PHARMACEUTICALS SHALL SELL OR
OFFER TO SELL PHARMACEUTICALS FOR AN AMOUNT WHICH REPRESENTS AN UNCON-
SCIONABLY EXCESSIVE PRICE. WHETHER A PRICE IS UNCONSCIONABLY EXCESSIVE
IS A QUESTION OF LAW FOR THE COURT.
3. THE COURT'S DETERMINATION THAT A VIOLATION OF THIS SECTION HAS
OCCURRED SHALL BE BASED ON ANY OF THE FOLLOWING FACTORS:
(A) THAT THE AMOUNT OF THE EXCESS IN PRICE IS UNCONSCIONABLY EXTREME;
(B) THAT THERE WAS AN EXERCISE OF UNFAIR LEVERAGE OR UNCONSCIONABLE
MEANS; OR
(C) A COMBINATION OF BOTH FACTORS.
4. IN ANY COURT PROCEEDING COMMENCED PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION, PROOF
THAT A VIOLATION OF THIS SECTION HAS OCCURRED SHALL INCLUDE EVIDENCE
THAT:
(A) THE AMOUNT CHARGED REPRESENTS A GROSS DISPARITY BETWEEN THE MARKET
PRICE OF THE PHARMACEUTICAL THAT LED TO THE ACTION UNDER THIS SECTION
AND THE PRICE OF THE SAME PHARMACEUTICAL OVER THE SIX MONTHS PRIOR TO
THE PRICE CHANGE THAT LED TO THE ACTION UNDER THIS SECTION; OR
(B) THE AMOUNT CHARGED GROSSLY EXCEEDED THE PRICE AT WHICH THE PHARMA-
CEUTICALS WERE READILY OBTAINABLE BY OTHER PURCHASERS.
EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD05326-01-9
A. 6606 2
5. A DEFENDANT MAY REBUT A PRIMA FACIE CASE WITH EVIDENCE THAT ADDI-
TIONAL COSTS NOT WITHIN THE CONTROL OF THE DEFENDANT WERE IMPOSED ON THE
DEFENDANT.
6. WHERE A VIOLATION OF THIS SECTION IS ALLEGED TO HAVE OCCURRED, THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL MAY APPLY IN THE NAME OF THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW
YORK TO THE SUPREME COURT WITHIN THE JUDICIAL DISTRICT IN WHICH SUCH
VIOLATION IS ALLEGED TO HAVE OCCURRED, ON NOTICE OF FIVE DAYS, FOR AN
ORDER ENJOINING OR RESTRAINING COMMISSION OR CONTINUANCE OF THE ALLEGED
UNLAWFUL ACTS. IN ANY SUCH PROCEEDING WHERE A VIOLATION IS FOUND TO HAVE
OCCURRED, THE COURT SHALL IMPOSE A CIVIL PENALTY IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO
EXCEED ONE MILLION DOLLARS AND, WHERE APPROPRIATE, ORDER RESTITUTION TO
AGGRIEVED CONSUMERS.
§ 2. This act shall take effect immediately.