S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________
419
2019-2020 Regular Sessions
I N S E N A T E
(PREFILED)
January 9, 2019
___________
Introduced by Sen. LANZA -- read twice and ordered printed, and when
printed to be committed to the Committee on Education
AN ACT to amend the education law, in relation to the use of student
testing results in annual teacher evaluations
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Paragraph a of subdivision 4 of section 3012-d of the
education law, as added by section 2 of subpart E of part EE of chapter
56 of the laws of 2015, subparagraph 1 as amended by section 3 of
subpart C of part B of chapter 20 of the laws of 2015, is amended to
read as follows:
a. Student performance category. Such category shall have at least one
subcomponent and an optional second subcomponent as follows:
(1) For the first subcomponent, [(A) for a teacher whose course ends
in a state-created or administered test for which there is a state-pro-
vided growth model, such teacher shall have a state-provided growth
score based on such model, which shall take into consideration certain
student characteristics, as determined by the commissioner, including
but not limited to students with disabilities, poverty, English language
learner status and prior academic history and which shall identify
educators whose students' growth is well above or well below average
compared to similar students for a teacher's or principal's students
after the certain student characteristics above are taken into account;
and (B) for a teacher whose course does not end in a state-created or
administered test such teacher shall have] a student learning objective
(SLO) consistent with a goal-setting process determined or developed by
the commissioner, that results in a student growth score; provided that,
for any teacher whose course ends in a state-created or administered
assessment for which there is no state-provided growth model, such
assessment must be used as the underlying assessment for such SLO;
EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD05309-01-9
S. 419 2
(2) For the optional second subcomponent, a district may locally
select a second measure in accordance with this subparagraph. Such
second measure shall apply in a consistent manner, to the extent practi-
cable, across the district and be [either: (A) a second state-provided
growth score on a state-created or administered test under clause (A) of
subparagraph one of this paragraph, or (B)] a growth score based on a
state-designed supplemental assessment, calculated using a state-provid-
ed or approved growth model. The optional second subcomponent shall
provide options for multiple assessment measures that are aligned to
existing classroom and school best practices and take into consideration
the recommendations in the testing reduction report as required by
section one of subpart F of [the] PART EE OF chapter FIFTY-SIX of the
laws of two thousand fifteen [which added this section] regarding the
reduction of unnecessary additional testing.
The commissioner shall determine the weights and scoring ranges for
the subcomponent or subcomponents of the student performance category
that shall result in a combined category rating. The commissioner shall
also set parameters for appropriate targets for student growth for both
subcomponents, and the department must affirmatively approve and shall
have the authority to disapprove or require modifications of district
plans that do not set appropriate growth targets, including after
initial approval. The commissioner shall set such weights and parameters
consistent with the terms contained herein.
§ 2. This act shall take effect immediately.