S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________
6216--A
2019-2020 Regular Sessions
I N S E N A T E
May 23, 2019
___________
Introduced by Sens. BAILEY, SKOUFIS -- read twice and ordered printed,
and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Insurance --
recommitted to the Committee on Insurance in accordance with Senate
Rule 6, sec. 8 -- committee discharged, bill amended, ordered
reprinted as amended and recommitted to said committee
AN ACT to amend the insurance law, in relation to unfair claim settle-
ment practices
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The insurance law is amended by adding a new section 2601-a
to read as follows:
§ 2601-A. UNFAIR CLAIM SETTLEMENT PRACTICES; CIVIL REMEDY. (A) THE
HOLDER OF A POLICY ISSUED OR RENEWED PURSUANT TO ARTICLE THIRTY-FOUR OF
THIS CHAPTER SHALL HAVE A PRIVATE RIGHT OF ACTION AGAINST ANY INSURER
DOING BUSINESS IN THIS STATE FOR DAMAGES AS PROVIDED IN THIS SECTION
UPON SUCH POLICYHOLDER PROVING BY A PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE THAT
SUCH INSURER'S REFUSAL TO PAY OR UNREASONABLE DELAY IN PAYMENT TO THE
POLICYHOLDER OF AMOUNTS CLAIMED TO BE DUE UNDER A POLICY WAS NOT REASON-
ABLY JUSTIFIED. AN INSURER IS NOT REASONABLY JUSTIFIED IN REFUSING TO
PAY OR IN UNREASONABLY DELAYING PAYMENT WHEN THE INSURER:
(1) FAILED TO PROVIDE THE POLICYHOLDER WITH ACCURATE INFORMATION
CONCERNING POLICY PROVISIONS RELATING TO THE COVERAGE AT ISSUE;
(2) FAILED TO EFFECTUATE A PROMPT AND FAIR SETTLEMENT OF A CLAIM OR
ANY PORTION THEREOF, AND THE INSURER FAILED TO REASONABLY ACCORD AT
LEAST EQUAL OR MORE FAVORABLE CONSIDERATION TO ITS INSURED INTEREST AS
IT DID TO ITS OWN INTERESTS, AND THEREBY EXPOSED THE INSURED TO A JUDG-
MENT IN EXCESS OF THE POLICY LIMITS;
(3) FAILED TO PROVIDE A TIMELY WRITTEN DENIAL OF A POLICYHOLDER'S
CLAIM WITH A FULL AND COMPLETE EXPLANATION OF SUCH DENIAL, INCLUDING
REFERENCES TO SPECIFIC POLICY PROVISIONS WHEREVER POSSIBLE;
EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD00885-05-0
S. 6216--A 2
(4) FAILED TO MAKE A FINAL DETERMINATION AND NOTIFY THE POLICYHOLDER
IN WRITING OF ITS POSITION ON BOTH LIABILITY FOR AND THE INSURER'S VALU-
ATION OF A CLAIM WITHIN SIX MONTHS OF THE DATE ON WHICH IT RECEIVED
ACTUAL OR CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE OF THE LOSS UPON WHICH THE CLAIM IS BASED;
(5) FAILED TO ACT IN GOOD FAITH BY COMPELLING A POLICYHOLDER TO INSTI-
TUTE SUIT TO RECOVER AMOUNTS DUE UNDER ITS POLICY BY OFFERING SUBSTAN-
TIALLY LESS THAN THE AMOUNTS ULTIMATELY RECOVERED IN SUIT BROUGHT BY
SUCH POLICYHOLDER;
(6) FAILED TO ADVISE A POLICYHOLDER THAT A CLAIM MAY EXCEED POLICY
LIMITS, THAT COUNSEL ASSIGNED BY THE INSURER MAY BE SUBJECT TO A
CONFLICT OF INTEREST, OR THAT THE POLICYHOLDER MAY RETAIN INDEPENDENT
COUNSEL;
(7) FAILED TO PROVIDE, ON REQUEST OF THE POLICYHOLDER OR THEIR REPRE-
SENTATIVE, ALL REPORTS, LETTERS OR OTHER DOCUMENTATION ARISING FROM THE
INVESTIGATION OF A CLAIM AND EVALUATING LIABILITY FOR OR VALUATION OF
SUCH CLAIM;
(8) REFUSED TO PAY A CLAIM WITHOUT CONDUCTING A REASONABLE INVESTI-
GATION;
(9) NEGOTIATED OR SETTLED A CLAIM DIRECTLY WITH A POLICYHOLDER KNOWN
TO BE REPRESENTED BY AN ATTORNEY WITHOUT THE ATTORNEY'S KNOWLEDGE OR
CONSENT. THE PROVISIONS OF THIS PARAGRAPH SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO PROHIB-
IT ROUTINE INQUIRIES TO A POLICYHOLDER TO OBTAIN DETAILS CONCERNING THE
CLAIM;
(10) FAILED TO PAY ON ONE OR MORE ELEMENTS OF A CLAIM WHERE A PREPON-
DERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE ESTABLISHES THE CLAIM AS TO LIABILITY NOTWITH-
STANDING THE EXISTENCE OF DISPUTES AS TO OTHER ELEMENTS OF THE CLAIM
WHERE SUCH PAYMENT CAN BE MADE WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO EITHER PARTY; OR
(11) ACTED IN VIOLATION OF SECTION TWO THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED ONE OF
THIS ARTICLE OR ANY REGULATION PROMULGATED PURSUANT THERETO.
(B) ANY POLICYHOLDER WHO ESTABLISHES LIABILITY PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION
(A) OF THIS SECTION SHALL BE ENTITLED TO RECOVER, IN ADDITION TO AMOUNTS
DUE UNDER THE POLICY, INTEREST, COSTS AND DISBURSEMENTS, COMPENSATORY
DAMAGES, CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, AND REASONABLE ATTORNEYS' FEES INCURRED
BY THE POLICYHOLDER FROM THE DATE OF THE LOSS, IN RECOVERING MONIES DUE
PURSUANT TO THE TERMS OF THE POLICY, AS WELL AS SUCH ADDITIONAL PUNITIVE
DAMAGES AS THE COURT MAY ALLOW. FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, IT SHALL
BE PRESUMED THAT CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES WERE WITHIN THE CONTEMPLATION OF
THE PARTIES AT THE TIME OF CONTRACTING.
(C) ANY POLICYHOLDER MAY RECOVER DAMAGES FROM AN INSURER DOING BUSI-
NESS IN THIS STATE PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION EITHER AS PART OF AN ACTION
TO RECOVER UNDER THE TERMS OF AN INSURANCE POLICY OR IN A SEPARATE
ACTION.
(D) IN ANY TRIAL OF A CAUSE OF ACTION ASSERTED AGAINST AN INSURER
PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION, EVIDENCE OF SETTLEMENT DISCUSSIONS WRITTEN AND
VERBAL OFFERS TO COMPROMISE AND OTHER EVIDENCE RELATING TO THE CLAIMS
PROCESS SHALL BE ADMISSIBLE. IF CAUSES OF ACTION RELATING TO LIABILITY
OF THE INSURER UNDER THE POLICY AND UNDER THIS SECTION ARE ALLEGED IN
THE SAME ACTION, THE COURT MAY BIFURCATE THE TRIAL OF ISSUES SO AS TO
AVOID PREJUDICE TO THE INSURER ON THE ISSUE OF LIABILITY UNDER THE POLI-
CY AND FACILITATE ADMISSIBILITY OF EVIDENCE ON THE CAUSES OF ACTION
ASSERTED PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION.
(E) ALL AMOUNTS RECOVERED FROM AN INSURER AS DAMAGES AND REASONABLE
ATTORNEYS' FEES IN ANY ACTION AUTHORIZED IN THIS SECTION SHALL BE
EXCLUDED BY THE INSURER IN ITS DETERMINATIONS OF THE PREMIUMS IT WILL
CHARGE ALL POLICYHOLDERS ON ALL POLICIES ISSUED BY IT.
S. 6216--A 3
(F) NOTHING IN THIS SECTION SHALL BE CONSTRUED TO LIMIT A
POLICYHOLDER'S RIGHT TO A TRIAL BY JURY FOR ANY CLAIMS ARISING UNDER
THIS SECTION.
(G) AN ACTION MAY ALSO BE MAINTAINED BY THE PERSONS IDENTIFIED IN
PARAGRAPHS ONE, TWO AND THREE OF SUBSECTION (B) OF SECTION THREE THOU-
SAND FOUR HUNDRED TWENTY OF THIS CHAPTER AGAINST AN INSURER TO RECOVER
DAMAGES INCLUDING COMPENSATORY DAMAGES, PUNITIVE DAMAGES AS THE COURT
MAY ALLOW, AND INTEREST MEASURED FROM THE TIME OF FAILURE TO OFFER A
FAIR AND REASONABLE SETTLEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS SECTION, FROM
SUCH INSURER TO THE FULL EXTENT OF THE JUDGMENT AGAINST THE INSURED, NOT
LIMITED TO THE POLICY LIMITS AND NOT SUBJECT TO THE LIMITATIONS AND
CONDITIONS OF PARAGRAPH TWO OF SUBSECTION (A) OF SECTION THREE THOUSAND
FOUR HUNDRED TWENTY OF THIS CHAPTER, WHERE A PREPONDERANCE OF THE
EVIDENCE ESTABLISHES THAT THE INSURER FAILED TO EFFECTUATE A PROMPT AND
FAIR SETTLEMENT OF A CLAIM OR ANY PORTION THEREOF, AND WHERE UNDER THE
TOTALITY OF THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES RELATED TO THE CLAIM, THE INSUR-
ER FAILED TO REASONABLY ACCORD AT LEAST EQUAL OR MORE FAVORABLE CONSID-
ERATION TO ITS INSURED'S INTERESTS AS IT DID TO ITS OWN INTERESTS, AND
THEREBY EXPOSED THE INSURED TO A JUDGMENT IN EXCESS OF THE POLICY
LIMITS.
(H) THE RIGHTS ENUMERATED IN THIS SECTION ARE NOT THE EXCLUSIVE REME-
DIES AVAILABLE TO THE POLICYHOLDER AND DO NOT PRECLUDE ANY COMMON LAW
CLAIMS OR OTHER STATUTORY CLAIMS THAT MAY EXIST OR RISE.
§ 2. Section 3425 of the insurance law is amended by adding a new
subsection (t) to read as follows:
(T) NO INSURER SHALL REFUSE TO ISSUE OR RENEW A COVERED POLICY SOLELY
ON THE GROUND THAT THE POLICYHOLDER HAS BROUGHT AN ACTION PURSUANT TO
SECTION TWO THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED ONE-A OF THIS CHAPTER.
§ 3. Paragraph 4 of subsection (a) of section 2601 of the insurance
law, as amended by chapter 547 of the laws of 1997, is amended to read
as follows:
(4) [not attempting in good faith] WHERE THE INSURER FAILED to effec-
tuate A prompt[,] AND fair [and equitable settlements] SETTLEMENT of
[claims submitted in which liability has become reasonably clear] A
CLAIM OR ANY PORTION THEREOF, AND THE INSURER FAILED TO REASONABLY
ACCORD AT LEAST EQUAL OR MORE FAVORABLE CONSIDERATION TO ITS INSURED'S
INTERESTS AS IT DID TO IT OWN INTERESTS, AND THEREBY EXPOSED THE INSURED
TO A JUDGMENT IN EXCESS OF THE POLICY LIMITS, except where there is a
reasonable basis supported by specific information available for review
by the department that the claimant has caused the loss to occur by
arson. After receiving a properly executed proof of loss, the insurer
shall advise the claimant of acceptance or denial of the claim within
thirty working days;
§ 4. This act shall take effect on the first of January next succeed-
ing the date on which it shall have become a law, and shall apply to all
acts and omissions by insurers occurring on or after such effective
date.