S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________
2760
2021-2022 Regular Sessions
I N S E N A T E
January 25, 2021
___________
Introduced by Sens. RAMOS, HOYLMAN, JACKSON, KRUEGER, SEPULVEDA -- read
twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the
Committee on Codes
AN ACT to amend the executive law, in relation to creating a written
policy on the use of sustained auditory dispersal tools
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Section 837 of the executive law is amended by adding a new
subdivision 23 to read as follows:
23. (A) ESTABLISH A WRITTEN POLICY PROHIBITING POLICE AGENCIES FROM
USING SUSTAINED AUDITORY DISPERSAL TOOLS.
(B) FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SUBDIVISION, THE TERM "SUSTAINED AUDITORY
DISPERSAL TOOL" SHALL MEAN ANY LONG RANGE ACOUSTIC DEVICE, SONIC WEAPON,
SONIC CANNON, OR ANY HIGH POWERED SOUND MAGNIFIER, USING PIEZOELECTRIC
TRANSDUCER OR OTHER TECHNOLOGY, TO EMIT SUSTAINED TONES, BEEPS, CHIRPS,
OR ANY DETERRENT TONE OR OTHER NON-VERBAL COMMUNICATION AT DECIBELS
SHOWN TO CAUSE HEARING LOSS OR OTHER DANGEROUS EFFECTS FOR A SUSTAINED
PERIOD. ANY SUCH TONE OR NON-VERBAL COMMUNICATION OVER NINETY DECIBELS
SHALL BE CONSIDERED PRESUMPTIVELY UNREASONABLE. THE TERM "SUSTAINED
AUDITORY DISPERSAL TOOL" SHALL NOT INCLUDE ANY DEVICE DESIGNED TO MAGNI-
FY INFORMATION OR ORDERS VIA VERBAL COMMUNICATION AT NINETY DECIBELS OR
BELOW, AND PROPERLY ADMINISTERED ACCORDING TO HEALTH AND SAFETY STAND-
ARDS, BY PROPERLY TRAINED PERSONNEL, PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT SUCH USE OF
ANY SUCH DEVICE AS A DETERRENT AND NOT AS A MODE OF VERBAL COMMUNICATION
SHALL CAUSE SUCH DEVICE TO BE A "SUSTAINED AUDITORY DISPERSAL TOOL".
(C) (I) ANY INDIVIDUAL WHO HAS BEEN SUBJECTED TO A SUSTAINED AUDITORY
DISPERSAL TOOL BY A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER IN VIOLATION OF THIS SECTION
OR THE WRITTEN POLICY OF THE DIVISION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE SERVICES
PROMULGATED UNDER THIS SECTION MAY INSTITUTE A CIVIL ACTION AGAINST THE
EMPLOYING AGENCY OF SUCH LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER FOR ANY OF THE FOLLOW-
ING:
EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD06611-01-1
S. 2760 2
(A) ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS PER VIOLATION OR ACTUAL DAMAGES, WHICHEVER IS
GREATER;
(B) PUNITIVE DAMAGES;
(C) INJUNCTIVE OR DECLARATORY RELIEF; AND/OR
(D) ANY OTHER RELIEF THE COURT DEEMS PROPER.
(II) IN ASSESSING THE AMOUNT OF PUNITIVE DAMAGES, THE COURT SHALL
CONSIDER:
(A) THE NUMBER OF TIMES THE PERSON WAS UNLAWFULLY SUBJECTED TO A
SUSTAINED AUDITORY DISPERSAL TOOL;
(B) THE DECIBEL LEVEL USED;
(C) MEDICAL COMPLICATIONS RESULTING FROM THE USE OF SUSTAINED AUDITORY
DISPERSAL TOOL; AND
(D) THE PERSISTENCE OF VIOLATIONS BY THE PARTICULAR LAW ENFORCEMENT
AGENCY AND LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER.
(III) IN ANY ACTION BROUGHT UNDER THIS SECTION, THE COURT MAY AWARD
REASONABLE ATTORNEYS' FEES TO A PREVAILING PLAINTIFF.
§ 2. This act shall take effect immediately.