S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________
7293
2021-2022 Regular Sessions
I N S E N A T E
July 16, 2021
___________
Introduced by Sen. THOMAS -- read twice and ordered printed, and when
printed to be committed to the Committee on Rules
AN ACT to amend the real property actions and proceedings law and the
civil practice law and rules, in relation to the rights of parties
involved in foreclosure actions
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Subdivision 3 of section 1301 of the real property actions
and proceedings law, as added by chapter 312 of the laws of 1962, is
amended and a new subdivision 4 is added to read as follows:
3. While the action is pending or after final judgment for the plain-
tiff therein, no other action shall be commenced or maintained to
recover any part of the mortgage debt, without leave of the court in
which the former action was brought. THIS SUBDIVISION SHALL NOT BE
TREATED AS A STAY OR STATUTORY PROHIBITION FOR PURPOSES OF CALCULATING
THE TIME WITHIN WHICH AN ACTION SHALL BE COMMENCED PURSUANT TO SECTIONS
TWO HUNDRED FOUR AND TWO HUNDRED THIRTEEN OF THE CIVIL PRACTICE LAW AND
RULES.
4. IF AN ACTION TO COLLECT ANY PART OF THE MORTGAGE DEBT IS ADJUDI-
CATED TO BE BARRED BY THE APPLICABLE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS, ANY OTHER
ACTION SEEKING TO RECOVER ANY PART OF THE SAME MORTGAGE DEBT SHALL ALSO
BE BARRED BY THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS.
§ 2. Rule 3217 of the civil practice law and rules is amended by
adding a new subdivision (e) to read as follows:
(E) EFFECT OF DISCONTINUANCE UPON CERTAIN INSTRUMENTS. IN ANY ACTION
ON AN INSTRUMENT DESCRIBED UNDER SUBDIVISION FOUR OF SECTION TWO HUNDRED
THIRTEEN OF THIS CHAPTER IN WHICH THE UNDERLYING INDEBTEDNESS WAS ACCEL-
ERATED BY THE COMMENCEMENT OF SUCH ACTION, THE VOLUNTARY DISCONTINUANCE
OF SUCH ACTION, WHETHER ON MOTION OR BY STIPULATION, SHALL NOT HAVE THE
EFFECT OF REVOKING ACCELERATION UNLESS SUCH DISCONTINUANCE IS EFFECTED
WITHIN SIX YEARS OF THE COMMENCEMENT OF THE ACTION AND EXPLICITLY
EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD11254-04-1
S. 7293 2
ADVISES THE DEFENDANT OR DEFENDANTS THAT SUCH ACCELERATION IS REVOKED
AND ADVISES THE DEFENDANT OR DEFENDANTS THAT THE PLAINTIFF SHALL RESUME
ACCEPTING INSTALLMENT PAYMENTS.
§ 3. Subdivision (c) of section 205 of the civil practice law and
rules, as amended by chapter 216 of the laws of 1992, is amended to read
as follows:
(c) Application. This section also applies to a proceeding brought
under the workers' compensation law BUT SHALL NOT APPLY TO ANY PROCEED-
ING GOVERNED BY SECTION TWO HUNDRED FIVE-A OF THIS ARTICLE.
§ 4. The civil practice law and rules is amended by adding a new
section 205-a to read as follows:
§ 205-A. TERMINATION OF CERTAIN ACTIONS RELATED TO REAL PROPERTY. (A)
IF AN ACTION UPON AN INSTRUMENT DESCRIBED UNDER SUBDIVISION FOUR OF
SECTION TWO HUNDRED THIRTEEN OF THIS ARTICLE IS TIMELY COMMENCED AND IS
TERMINATED IN ANY MANNER OTHER THAN A VOLUNTARY DISCONTINUANCE, A FAIL-
URE TO OBTAIN PERSONAL JURISDICTION OVER THE DEFENDANT, A DISMISSAL OF
THE COMPLAINT FOR ANY FORM OF NEGLECT, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO
THOSE SPECIFIED IN SUBDIVISION THREE OF SECTION THIRTY-ONE HUNDRED TWEN-
TY-SIX, SECTION THIRTY-TWO HUNDRED FIFTEEN, RULE THIRTY-TWO HUNDRED
SIXTEEN AND RULE THIRTY-FOUR HUNDRED FOUR OF THIS CHAPTER, FOR VIOLATION
OF ANY UNIFORM COURT RULES OR INDIVIDUAL PART RULES, FOR FAILURE TO
COMPLY WITH ANY COURT SCHEDULING ORDERS, OR BY DEFAULT DUE TO NONAPPEAR-
ANCE FOR CONFERENCE OR AT A CALENDAR CALL, OR BY FAILURE TO TIMELY
SUBMIT ANY ORDER OR JUDGMENT, OR UPON A FINAL JUDGMENT UPON THE MERITS,
THE PLAINTIFF, OR, IF THE PLAINTIFF DIES AND THE CAUSE OF ACTION
SURVIVES, HIS OR HER EXECUTOR OR ADMINISTRATOR, MAY COMMENCE A NEW
ACTION UPON THE SAME TRANSACTION OR OCCURRENCE OR SERIES OF TRANSACTIONS
OR OCCURRENCES WITHIN SIX MONTHS FOLLOWING THE TERMINATION, PROVIDED
THAT THE NEW ACTION WOULD HAVE BEEN TIMELY COMMENCED WITHIN THE APPLICA-
BLE LIMITATIONS PERIOD PRESCRIBED BY LAW AT THE TIME OF THE COMMENCEMENT
OF THE PRIOR ACTION AND THAT SERVICE UPON THE ORIGINAL DEFENDANT IS
EFFECTED WITHIN SUCH SIX-MONTH PERIOD. FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SUBDIVISION:
1. AN ASSIGNEE OF THE PLAINTIFF SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO HAVE CAPACITY
TO MAINTAIN THE ACTION AS A SUCCESSOR PLAINTIFF, UNLESS PLEADING AND
PROVING THAT SUCH ASSIGNEE IS ACTING ON BEHALF OF OR ASSERTING THE
RIGHTS OF THE ORIGINAL PLAINTIFF; AND
2. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE PLAINTIFF RECEIVE MORE THAN ONE SIX-MONTH
EXTENSION.
(B) WHERE THE DEFENDANT HAS SERVED AN ANSWER AND THE ACTION UPON AN
INSTRUMENT DESCRIBED UNDER SUBDIVISION FOUR OF SECTION TWO HUNDRED THIR-
TEEN OF THIS ARTICLE IS TERMINATED IN ANY MANNER, AND A NEW ACTION UPON
THE SAME TRANSACTION OR OCCURRENCE OR SERIES OF TRANSACTIONS OR OCCUR-
RENCES IS COMMENCED BY THE ORIGINAL PLAINTIFF, OR A SUCCESSOR IN INTER-
EST OR ASSIGNEE OF THE ORIGINAL PLAINTIFF, THE ASSERTION OF ANY CAUSE OF
ACTION OR DEFENSE BY THE DEFENDANT IN THE NEW ACTION SHALL BE TIMELY IF
SUCH CAUSE OF ACTION OR DEFENSE WAS TIMELY ASSERTED IN THE PRIOR ACTION.
§ 5. This act shall take effect immediately.