NY State Senate Bill S1184A

Archive: Last Bill Status - Passed Senate

Introduced
In Committee
On Floor Calendar
- Passed Senate
- Passed Assembly
Delivered to Governor
Signed/Vetoed by Governor

Your Voice

Please enter your contact information

First Name *

Last Name *

Email Address *

A valid email address is required.

Home address search or enter your address manually *

Home address is used to determine the senate district in which you reside. Your support or opposition to this bill is then shared immediately with the senator who represents you.

Optional services from the NY State Senate:

Create an account. An account allows you to officially support or oppose key legislation, sign petitions with a single click, and follow issues, committees, and bills that matter to you. When you create an account, you agree to this platform's terms of participation.

Include a custom message for your Senator? (Optional)

Enter a message to your senator. Many New Yorkers use this to share the reasoning behind their support or opposition to the bill. Others might share a personal anecdote about how the bill would affect them or people they care about.

Leave this field blank

Actions

view actions (24)

	Assembly Actions - Lowercase Senate Actions - UPPERCASE
May 24, 2022	referred to codes delivered to assembly passed senate
Mar 09, 2022	advanced to third reading
Mar 08, 2022	2nd report cal.
Mar 07, 2022	1st report cal.651
Jan 05, 2022	referred to codes returned to senate died in assembly
Jun 08, 2021	ordered to third reading rules cal.556 substituted for a5264c
Jun 07, 2021	referred to codes returned to assembly repassed senate
Jun 03, 2021	amended on third reading 1184a
Jun 03, 2021	vote reconsidered - restored to third reading returned to senate recalled from assembly
Jan 20, 2021	referred to codes delivered to assembly passed senate
Jan 19, 2021	ordered to third reading cal.65 reported and committed to rules
Jan 08, 2021	referred to codes

Votes

view votes

May 24, 2022 - floor Vote

S1184A

floor

Aye

Nay

Absent

Excused

Abstained

Mar 7, 2022 - Codes committee Vote

S1184A

committee

Aye

Nay

Aye with Reservations

Absent

Excused

Abstained

Jun 7, 2021 - floor Vote

S1184A

floor

Aye

Nay

Absent

Excused

Abstained

Jan 20, 2021 - floor Vote

S1184

floor

Aye

Nay

Absent

Excused

Abstained

Jan 19, 2021 - Codes committee Vote

S1184

committee

Aye

Nay

Aye with Reservations

Absent

Excused

Abstained

show committee vote details

Committee Vote: Jan 19, 2021

aye (7)

nay (4)

aye wr (1)

Kavanagh

absent (1)

Sepúlveda

Jan 19, 2021 - Rules committee Vote

S1184

committee

Aye

Nay

Aye with Reservations

Absent

Excused

Abstained

Bill Amendments

Original

A (Active)

Original

A (Active)

Co-Sponsors

view additional co-sponsors

S1184 - Details

See Assembly Version of this Bill:: A5264
Current Committee:: Assembly Codes
Law Section:: Criminal Procedure Law
Laws Affected:: Amd §140.20, add Art 3 §3.10, CP L; amd §7009, CPLR
Versions Introduced in Other Legislative Sessions:: 2019-2020: S8707, A10884
2023-2024: S449

S1184 - Summary

Relates to detaining persons for longer than twenty-four hours.

S1184 - Sponsor Memo

 
BILL NUMBER: S1184

SPONSOR: GIANARIS
 
TITLE OF BILL:

An act to amend the criminal procedure law and the civil practice law
and rules, in relation to detaining persons for longer than twenty-four
hours

 
PURPOSE:

This act shall ensure one's pre-arraignment detention does not exceed 24
hours without individualized explanations for why such a delay in
release was necessary, and requires cities with a population of over 1
million to establish and maintain a detained persons registry for
authorized users.

 
SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS:

Section one amends Section 140.20 of the criminal procedure law to add a
new subdivision 9 which defines an "unnecessary delay" as it relates to

pre-arraignment detention as one before twenty-four hours or less have
expired.

Section two adds a new article 3 to the criminal procedure law which
requires cities with a population of one million or more create and
maintain a detained persons registry, the contents of which can permit
authorized users to locate detainees. Authorized users are defined to
consist of defender organizations contracted with cities to represent
criminal defendants. The agency administering the registry must verify
authorized users and at least annually purge users who no longer meet
the definition of an authorized user. The New York police department is
responsible for administering and operating the registry. Non-authorized
users may not have access to the registry, and the information obtained
by using the registry may only be used by authorized user in furtherance
of client or potential client representation.

Section three amends section 7009 of the civil practice law and rules by
adding a new subdivision (f) which presumes that any pre-arraignment
detention exceeding 24-hours is unnecessary and unlawful, unless clear
and convincing evidence is provided to demonstrate that a delay was
necessary for each an individual petitioner named in the writ.

Section four sets the effective date.

 
EXISTING LAW:

 
JUSTIFICATION:

In June 2020, hundreds of people in New York City alone were detained
for over 24 hours without being brought before a judge after being
arrested in a series of protests in light of the murder of George Floyd
and the Black Lives Matter movement. When public defenders petitioned
for their releases, New York City Criminal Court Judge Burke ruled the
State was permitted to hold detainees for more than 24 hours due to "a
civil unrest crisis within the overarching Covid-19 crisis." As a
result, people accused of committing crimes were forced into cramped
quarters indefinitely, posing an unnecessary risk to their health. The
protections in this bill would prevent New Yorkers from experiencing
unlawfully lengthy detention in the future, unless acceptable individ-
ualized reasons for the delay are provided.

This bill will codify a Court of Appeals ruling regarding pre-arraign-
ment detention, and include some additional protections.  In 1991, the
New York Court of Appeals decision in Roundtree v. New York set a
24-hour rule for pre-arraignment detention. The Court reasoned that
preliminary police duties which must be completed pre-arraignment can
easily be accomplished within 24 hours, unless an acceptable reason for
the delay is provided. Specifically, this bill would establish that any
pre-arraignment detention exceeding 24 hours from arrest to arraignment
constitutes an "unnecessary delay" under the law, until and unless the
presumption is rebutted by clear and convincing evidence that such a
delay was actually necessary for each individual petitioner identified
in a writ of habeas corpus. To further ensure that these provisions are
met and that defense attorneys have access to those who might require
assistance with pre-arraignment issues, this bill would also require
cities with a population of one million or greater to establish and
maintain a searchable online registry to locate detainees.

 
LEGISLATIVE HISTORY:

2020: Passed Senate/Died in Codes (Assembly)

 
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

 
LOCAL FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

 
EFFECTIVE DATE:
This act shall take effect immediately.

S1184 - Bill Text download pdf

 
                     S T A T E   O F   N E W   Y O R K
 ________________________________________________________________________
 
                                   1184
 
                        2021-2022 Regular Sessions
 
                             I N  S E N A T E
 
                              January 8, 2021
                                ___________
 
 Introduced by Sens. GIANARIS, BAILEY, BIAGGI, HOYLMAN, JACKSON, KRUEGER,
   LIU,  SALAZAR,  SERRANO  --  read  twice and ordered printed, and when
   printed to be committed to the Committee on Codes
 
 AN ACT to amend the criminal procedure law and the  civil  practice  law
   and  rules,  in  relation to detaining persons for longer than twenty-
   four hours

   THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND  ASSEM-
 BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
 
   Section  1. Section 140.20 of the criminal procedure law is amended by
 adding a new subdivision 9 to read as follows:
   9. FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, "UNNECESSARY DELAY" SHALL MEAN BEFORE
 TWENTY-FOUR HOURS OR LESS HAVE EXPIRED, COMMENCING AT THE  TIME  OF  THE
 PERSON  BEING  TAKEN  INTO CUSTODY BY SUCH POLICE OFFICER, OR ANY PERSON
 ACTING ON BEHALF OF A POLICE OFFICER, EVEN WHEN  NO  ARREST  NUMBER  HAS
 BEEN  ISSUED.  THE  FAILURE  OR  INABILITY  OF  ANY GOVERNMENT AGENCY TO
 FULFILL THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS SECTION, AS  DETERMINED  BY  THE  COURT
 AFTER  APPLICATION  MADE BY THE DETAINEE OR THEIR COUNSEL, SHALL REQUIRE
 THE IMMEDIATE RELEASE FROM CUSTODY OF ANY PERSON SO HELD.
   § 2. The criminal procedure law is amended by adding a new  article  3
 to read as follows:
                                 ARTICLE 3
                         DETAINED PERSONS REGISTRY
 SECTION 3.10 DETAINED PERSONS REGISTRY.
 § 3.10 DETAINED PERSONS REGISTRY.
   1. CITIES WITH A POPULATION OF ONE MILLION OR MORE SHALL ESTABLISH AND
 MAINTAIN  A  SEARCHABLE  ONLINE REGISTRY, CONSISTING OF THE NAMES, AGES,
 AND LOCATIONS OF PERSONS TAKEN INTO CUSTODY BY A POLICE  DEPARTMENT  FOR
 ANY REASON, WHICH WILL PERMIT AUTHORIZED USERS TO LOCATE SUCH PERSONS.
   2. SUCH INFORMATION SHALL BE ENTERED INTO THE REGISTRY AT THE MOMENT A
 PERSON  IS  TAKEN  INTO  CUSTODY,  AND  UPON THE ISSUANCE OF ANY TYPE OF
 APPEARANCE TICKET, SUMMONS OR UPON THE ARRAIGNMENT OF ANY PERSON ENTERED
 
  EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                       [ ] is old law to be omitted.

                                                            LBD03652-01-1

 S. 1184                             2
 
 INTO THIS REGISTRY, OR UPON THE RELEASE OF ANY PERSON ENTERED INTO  THIS
 REGISTRY FROM DETENTION, ANY AND ALL DATA RELATED THERETO SHALL BE IMME-
 DIATELY REMOVED FROM THE REGISTRY, DESTROYED AND RENDERED UNAVAILABLE TO
 ANY ENTITY FOR ANY PURPOSE.
   3.  FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, AUTHORIZED USERS SHALL BE LIMIT-
 ED  TO DEFENDER ORGANIZATIONS CONTRACTED WITH CITIES TO REPRESENT CRIMI-
 NAL DEFENDANTS.  THE AGENCY ADMINISTERING THE REGISTRY SHALL BE  CHARGED
 WITH ENSURING THAT AUTHORIZED USERS ARE EMPLOYED BY SUCH DEFENDER ORGAN-
 IZATIONS AND SHALL REQUIRE LOGIN CREDENTIALS AVAILABLE ONLY TO EMPLOYEES
 OF  SUCH  ORGANIZATIONS. THE ADMINISTERING AGENCY SHALL CONDUCT AN AUDIT
 AT LEAST ANNUALLY TO PURGE ANY USERS WHO ARE NO LONGER EMPLOYED BY  SUCH
 ORGANIZATIONS.
   4.  THE  SEARCHABLE ONLINE REGISTRY DESCRIBED IN THIS SECTION SHALL BE
 ADMINISTERED AND OPERATED SOLELY BY THE CITY OF NEW YORK POLICE  DEPART-
 MENT. NO NON-LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY, OFFICER, OR EMPLOYEE, NOR ANY
 NON-LOCAL  GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE, NOR ANY PRIVATE INDIVIDUAL OR OFFICER OF
 THE COURT WHO IS NOT AN AUTHORIZED USER, SHALL BE GIVEN ACCESS  TO  THIS
 REGISTRY  OR  PARTICIPATE  IN  THE  ADMINISTRATION  OR OPERATION OF THIS
 REGISTRY.
   5. NO AUTHORIZED USER OR OTHER PERSON WHO OBTAINS ACCESS TO THE REGIS-
 TRY DESCRIBED IN THIS SECTION SHALL DISCLOSE ANY INFORMATION OBTAINED OR
 LEARNED OF FROM SUCH REGISTRY TO ANY NON-LOCAL LAW  ENFORCEMENT  AGENCY,
 OFFICER, OR EMPLOYEE, OR TO ANY NON-LOCAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE, OR TO ANY
 PRIVATE INDIVIDUAL OR OFFICER OF THE COURT WHO IS NOT AN AUTHORIZED USER
 EXCEPT  BY  THE  DEFENDER  ORGANIZATION TO INDIVIDUALS IN FURTHERANCE OF
 CLIENT OR POTENTIAL CLIENT REPRESENTATION.
   § 3. Section 7009 of the civil practice law and rules  is  amended  by
 adding a new subdivision (f) to read as follows:
   (F)  PERSONS  DETAINED FOR LONGER THAN TWENTY-FOUR HOURS. FOR PURPOSES
 OF THIS ARTICLE, WHEN A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS HEARD  CHALLENGING  THE
 PRE-ARRAIGNMENT DETENTION OF A PERSON DETAINED FOR MORE THAN TWENTY-FOUR
 HOURS,  THERE SHALL BE AN EVIDENTIARY PRESUMPTION THAT SUCH DETENTION IS
 UNNECESSARY, AND UNLAWFUL AS DEFINED IN SECTION 140.20 OF  THE  CRIMINAL
 PROCEDURE  LAW,  UNTIL  AND UNLESS SUCH PRESUMPTION IS REBUTTED BY CLEAR
 AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE THAT SUCH A DELAY  WAS  ACTUALLY  NECESSARY  FOR
 EACH INDIVIDUAL PETITIONER IDENTIFIED IN THE WRIT.
   § 4. This act shall take effect immediately.

Co-Sponsors

view additional co-sponsors

S1184A (ACTIVE) - Details

See Assembly Version of this Bill:: A5264
Current Committee:: Assembly Codes
Law Section:: Criminal Procedure Law
Laws Affected:: Amd §140.20, add Art 3 §3.10, CP L; amd §7009, CPLR
Versions Introduced in Other Legislative Sessions:: 2019-2020: S8707, A10884
2023-2024: S449

S1184A (ACTIVE) - Summary

Relates to detaining persons for longer than twenty-four hours.

S1184A (ACTIVE) - Sponsor Memo

 
BILL NUMBER: S1184A

SPONSOR: GIANARIS
 
TITLE OF BILL:

An act to amend the criminal procedure law and the civil practice law
and rules, in relation to detaining persons for longer than twenty-four
hours

 
PURPOSE:

This act shall ensure one's pre-arraignment detention does not exceed 24
hours without individualized explanations for why such a delay in
release was unavoidable and actually necessary, and requires cities with
a population of over 1 million to establish and maintain a detained
persons registry for authorized users.

 
SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS:

Section one amends Section 140.20 of the criminal procedure law to add a
new subdivision 9 which defines "without unnecessary delay" as it

relates to pre-arraignment detention.

Section two adds a new article 3 to the criminal procedure law which
requires cities with a population of one million or more create and
maintain a detained persons registry, the contents of which can permit
authorized users to locate detainees. Authorized users are defined to
consist of defender organizations contracted with cities to represent
criminal defendants. The agency administering the registry must verify
authorized users and at least annually purge users who no longer meet
the definition of an authorized user. The New York police department is
responsible for administering and operating the registry. Non-authorized
users may not have access to the registry, and the information obtained
by using the registry may only be used by authorized user in furtherance
of client or potential client representation.

Section three amends section 7009 of the civil practice law and rules by
adding a new subdivision (f) which presumes that any pre-arraignment
detention exceeding 24-hours is avoidable, unnecessary and unlawful,
unless clear and convincing evidence of compelling facts and circum-
stance is provided to demonstrate that the delay was unavoidable and
actually necessary for each individual petitioner named in the writ.

Section four sets the effective date.

 
EXISTING LAW:

 
JUSTIFICATION:

In June 2020, hundreds of people in New York City alone were detained
for over 24 hours without being brought before a judge after being
arrested in a series of protests in light of the murder of George Floyd
and the Black Lives Matter movement. When public defenders petitioned
for their releases, New York City Criminal Court Judge Burke ruled the
State was permitted to hold detainees for more than 24 hours due to "a
civil unrest crisis within the overarching Covid-19 crisis." As a
result, people accused of committing crimes were forced into cramped
quarters indefinitely, posing an unnecessary risk to their health. The
protections in this bill would prevent New Yorkers from experiencing
unlawfully lengthy detention in the future, unless acceptable individ-
ualized reasons for the delay are provided.

This bill will codify a Court of Appeals ruling regarding pre-arraign-
ment detention, and include some additional protections.  In 1991, the
New York Court of Appeals decision in Roundtree v. New York set a
24-hour rule for pre-arraignment detention. The Court reasoned that
preliminary police duties which must be completed pre-arraignment can
easily be accomplished within 24 hours, unless an acceptable reason for
the delay is provided. Specifically, this bill would establish that any
pre-arraignment detention exceeding 24 hours from arrest to arraignment
constitutes an "unnecessary delay" under the law, until and unless the
presumption is rebutted by clear and convincing evidence that such a
delay was actually necessary for each individual petitioner identified
in a writ of habeas corpus. To further ensure that these provisions are
met and that defense attorneys have access to those who might require
assistance with pre-arraignment issues, this bill would also require
cities with a population of one million or greater to establish and
maintain a searchable online registry to locate detainees.

 
LEGISLATIVE HISTORY:

2020: Passed Senate/Died in Codes (Assembly)

 
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

None to the state.

 
LOCAL FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

 
EFFECTIVE DATE:
This act shall take effect immediately.

S1184A (ACTIVE) - Bill Text download pdf

 
                     S T A T E   O F   N E W   Y O R K
 ________________________________________________________________________
 
                                  1184--A
     Cal. No. 65
 
                        2021-2022 Regular Sessions
 
                             I N  S E N A T E
 
                              January 8, 2021
                                ___________
 
 Introduced  by  Sens. GIANARIS, BAILEY, BIAGGI, BROUK, HOYLMAN, JACKSON,
   KRUEGER, LIU, RIVERA, SALAZAR, SERRANO, STAVISKY  --  read  twice  and
   ordered  printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on
   Codes -- reported favorably from said committee and committed  to  the
   Committee  on Rules -- reported favorably from said committee, ordered
   to a third reading, passed by Senate and delivered  to  the  Assembly,
   recalled,  vote  reconsidered,  restored to third reading, amended and
   ordered reprinted, retaining its place in the order of third reading
 
 AN ACT to amend the criminal procedure law and the  civil  practice  law
   and  rules,  in  relation to detaining persons for longer than twenty-
   four hours
 
   THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND  ASSEM-
 BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
 
   Section  1. Section 140.20 of the criminal procedure law is amended by
 adding a new subdivision 9 to read as follows:
   9. FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION,  "WITHOUT  UNNECESSARY  DELAY"  SHALL
 MEAN  PROMPTLY,  AND  IN ANY EVENT BEFORE TWENTY-FOUR HOURS OR LESS HAVE
 EXPIRED, COMMENCING AT THE TIME OF THE PERSON BEING TAKEN  INTO  CUSTODY
 BY SUCH POLICE OFFICER, OR ANY PERSON ACTING ON BEHALF OF A POLICE OFFI-
 CER, EVEN WHEN NO ARREST NUMBER HAS BEEN ISSUED. THE FAILURE OR INABILI-
 TY OF ANY GOVERNMENT AGENCY TO FULFILL THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS SECTION,
 SHALL REQUIRE THE IMMEDIATE RELEASE FROM CUSTODY OF ANY PERSON SO HELD.
   §  2.  The criminal procedure law is amended by adding a new article 3
 to read as follows:
                                 ARTICLE 3
                         DETAINED PERSONS REGISTRY
 SECTION 3.10 DETAINED PERSONS REGISTRY.
 § 3.10 DETAINED PERSONS REGISTRY.
   1. CITIES WITH A POPULATION OF ONE MILLION OR MORE SHALL ESTABLISH AND
 MAINTAIN A SEARCHABLE ONLINE REGISTRY, CONSISTING OF  THE  NAMES,  AGES,
 
  EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                       [ ] is old law to be omitted.

                                                            LBD03652-03-1

 S. 1184--A                          2
 
 AND  LOCATIONS  OF PERSONS TAKEN INTO CUSTODY BY A POLICE DEPARTMENT FOR
 ANY REASON, WHICH WILL PERMIT AUTHORIZED USERS TO LOCATE SUCH PERSONS.
   2. SUCH INFORMATION SHALL BE ENTERED INTO THE REGISTRY AT THE MOMENT A
 PERSON  IS  TAKEN  INTO  CUSTODY,  AND  UPON THE ISSUANCE OF ANY TYPE OF
 APPEARANCE TICKET, SUMMONS OR UPON THE ARRAIGNMENT OF ANY PERSON ENTERED
 INTO THIS REGISTRY, OR UPON THE RELEASE OF ANY PERSON ENTERED INTO  THIS
 REGISTRY FROM DETENTION, ANY AND ALL DATA RELATED THERETO SHALL BE IMME-
 DIATELY REMOVED FROM THE REGISTRY, DESTROYED AND RENDERED UNAVAILABLE TO
 ANY ENTITY FOR ANY PURPOSE.
   3.  FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, AUTHORIZED USERS SHALL BE LIMIT-
 ED  TO DEFENDER ORGANIZATIONS CONTRACTED WITH CITIES TO REPRESENT CRIMI-
 NAL DEFENDANTS.  THE AGENCY ADMINISTERING THE REGISTRY SHALL BE  CHARGED
 WITH ENSURING THAT AUTHORIZED USERS ARE EMPLOYED BY SUCH DEFENDER ORGAN-
 IZATIONS AND SHALL REQUIRE LOGIN CREDENTIALS AVAILABLE ONLY TO EMPLOYEES
 OF  SUCH  ORGANIZATIONS. THE ADMINISTERING AGENCY SHALL CONDUCT AN AUDIT
 AT LEAST ANNUALLY TO PURGE ANY USERS WHO ARE NO LONGER EMPLOYED BY  SUCH
 ORGANIZATIONS.
   4.  THE  SEARCHABLE ONLINE REGISTRY DESCRIBED IN THIS SECTION SHALL BE
 ADMINISTERED AND OPERATED SOLELY BY THE CITY OF NEW YORK POLICE  DEPART-
 MENT. NO NON-LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY, OFFICER, OR EMPLOYEE, NOR ANY
 NON-LOCAL  GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE, NOR ANY PRIVATE INDIVIDUAL OR OFFICER OF
 THE COURT WHO IS NOT AN AUTHORIZED USER, SHALL BE GIVEN ACCESS  TO  THIS
 REGISTRY  OR  PARTICIPATE  IN  THE  ADMINISTRATION  OR OPERATION OF THIS
 REGISTRY.
   5. NO AUTHORIZED USER OR OTHER PERSON WHO OBTAINS ACCESS TO THE REGIS-
 TRY DESCRIBED IN THIS SECTION SHALL DISCLOSE ANY INFORMATION OBTAINED OR
 LEARNED OF FROM SUCH REGISTRY TO ANY NON-LOCAL LAW  ENFORCEMENT  AGENCY,
 OFFICER, OR EMPLOYEE, OR TO ANY NON-LOCAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE, OR TO ANY
 PRIVATE INDIVIDUAL OR OFFICER OF THE COURT WHO IS NOT AN AUTHORIZED USER
 EXCEPT  BY  THE  DEFENDER  ORGANIZATION TO INDIVIDUALS IN FURTHERANCE OF
 CLIENT OR POTENTIAL CLIENT REPRESENTATION.
   § 3. Section 7009 of the civil practice law and rules  is  amended  by
 adding a new subdivision (f) to read as follows:
   (F)  PERSONS  DETAINED FOR LONGER THAN TWENTY-FOUR HOURS. FOR PURPOSES
 OF THIS ARTICLE, WHEN A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS HEARD  CHALLENGING  THE
 PRE-ARRAIGNMENT DETENTION OF A PERSON DETAINED FOR MORE THAN TWENTY-FOUR
 HOURS,  THERE  SHALL  BE AN EVIDENTIARY PRESUMPTION THAT SUCH DETENTION,
 WITHOUT ARRAIGNMENT, WAS AVOIDABLE, UNNECESSARY AND UNLAWFUL AS  DEFINED
 IN  SECTION  140.20 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW, UNTIL AND UNLESS SUCH
 PRESUMPTION IS REBUTTED BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE  OF  COMPELLING
 FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCE DEMONSTRATING THAT SUCH DELAY WAS UNAVOIDABLE AND
 ACTUALLY  NECESSARY  FOR  EACH  INDIVIDUAL  PETITIONER IDENTIFIED IN THE
 WRIT.
   § 4. This act shall take effect immediately.

Comments

Open Legislation is a forum for New York State legislation. All comments are subject to review and community moderation is encouraged.

Comments deemed off-topic, commercial, campaign-related, self-promotional; or that contain profanity, hate or toxic speech; or that link to sites outside of the nysenate.gov domain are not permitted, and will not be published. Attempts to intimidate and silence contributors or deliberately deceive the public, including excessive or extraneous posting/posts, or coordinated activity, are prohibited and may result in the temporary or permanent banning of the user. Comment moderation is generally performed Monday through Friday. By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and verify you are over 13.

The New York State Senate

senate Bill S1184A

Sponsored By

Archive: Last Bill Status - Passed Senate

Your Voice

Actions

Votes

May 24, 2022 - floor Vote

Floor Vote: May 24, 2022

Mar 7, 2022 - Codes committee Vote

Codes Committee Vote: Mar 7, 2022

Jun 7, 2021 - floor Vote

Floor Vote: Jun 7, 2021

Jan 20, 2021 - floor Vote

Floor Vote: Jan 20, 2021

Jan 19, 2021 - Codes committee Vote

Committee Vote: Jan 19, 2021

Jan 19, 2021 - Rules committee Vote

Committee Vote: Jan 19, 2021

Bill Amendments

Co-Sponsors

S1184 - Details

S1184 - Summary

S1184 - Sponsor Memo

S1184 - Bill Text download pdf

Co-Sponsors

S1184A (ACTIVE) - Details

S1184A (ACTIVE) - Summary

S1184A (ACTIVE) - Sponsor Memo

S1184A (ACTIVE) - Bill Text download pdf

Comments

senate Bill S1184A

Share this bill

Sponsored By

Archive: Last Bill Status - Passed Senate

Your Voice

Actions

Votes

May 24, 2022 - floor Vote

Floor Vote: May 24, 2022

Mar 7, 2022 - Codes committee Vote

Codes Committee Vote: Mar 7, 2022

Jun 7, 2021 - floor Vote

Floor Vote: Jun 7, 2021

Jan 20, 2021 - floor Vote

Floor Vote: Jan 20, 2021

Jan 19, 2021 - Codes committee Vote

Committee Vote: Jan 19, 2021

Jan 19, 2021 - Rules committee Vote

Committee Vote: Jan 19, 2021

Bill Amendments

Co-Sponsors

S1184 - Details

S1184 - Summary

S1184 - Sponsor Memo

S1184 - Bill Text download pdf

Co-Sponsors

S1184A (ACTIVE) - Details

S1184A (ACTIVE) - Summary

S1184A (ACTIVE) - Sponsor Memo

S1184A (ACTIVE) - Bill Text download pdf

Comments