NY State Senate Bill S700

Current Bill Status - Passed Senate

Introduced
In Committee
On Floor Calendar
- Passed Senate
- Passed Assembly
Delivered to Governor
Signed/Vetoed by Governor

Your Voice

Please enter your contact information

First Name *

Last Name *

Email Address *

A valid email address is required.

Home address search or enter your address manually *

Home address is used to determine the senate district in which you reside. Your support or opposition to this bill is then shared immediately with the senator who represents you.

Optional services from the NY State Senate:

Create an account. An account allows you to officially support or oppose key legislation, sign petitions with a single click, and follow issues, committees, and bills that matter to you. When you create an account, you agree to this platform's terms of participation.

Include a custom message for your Senator? (Optional)

Enter a message to your senator. Many New Yorkers use this to share the reasoning behind their support or opposition to the bill. Others might share a personal anecdote about how the bill would affect them or people they care about.

Leave this field blank

Actions

view actions (7)

	Assembly Actions - Lowercase Senate Actions - UPPERCASE
May 12, 2021	referred to judiciary delivered to assembly passed senate
May 03, 2021	advanced to third reading
Apr 28, 2021	2nd report cal.
Apr 27, 2021	1st report cal.837
Jan 06, 2021	referred to judiciary

Votes

view votes

May 12, 2021 - floor Vote

S700

floor

Aye

Nay

Absent

Excused

Abstained

Apr 27, 2021 - Judiciary committee Vote

S700

committee

Aye

Nay

Aye with Reservations

Absent

Excused

Abstained

S700 (ACTIVE) - Details

See Assembly Version of this Bill:: A5895
Current Committee:: Assembly Judiciary
Law Section:: Judiciary Law
Laws Affected:: Rpld §470, Judy L
Versions Introduced in 2019-2020 Legislative Session:: S5708, A10425

S700 (ACTIVE) - Summary

Repeals provisions relating to allowing attorneys having offices in the state to reside in an adjoining state.

S700 (ACTIVE) - Sponsor Memo

 
BILL NUMBER: S700

SPONSOR: HOYLMAN
 
TITLE OF BILL:

An act to repeal section 470 of the judiciary law, relating to allowing
attorneys having offices in the state to reside in an adjoining state

 
PURPOSE OR GENERAL IDEA OF BILL:

The purpose of this bill is to remove the current inability of lawyers
admitted in New York to practice in the State if they neither reside nor
have an office in the state.

 
SUMMARY OF SPECIFIC PROVISIONS:

Section 1 of the bill repeals section 470 of the Judiciary law.

Section 2 of the bill is the effective date.

JUSTIFICATION:

Section 470 of the Judiciary Law, as interpreted by the New York State
Court of Appeals in Schoenefeld v. State of New York, 25 N.Y.3d 22
(2015), requires "nonresident attorneys practicing in New York to main-
tain a physical law officer here." (Pg. 27 of decision). The Court of
Appeals reaffirmed this requirement in Arrowhead Capital Finance, Ltd.
v. Cheyne Specialty Finance Fund L.P. (2019).

Section 470 was enacted in its current form in 1909 following predeces-
sor statutes dating from 1862. A central concern at the time was the
difficulty in serving attorneys not located in New York. The Court of
Appeals noted in the Schoenefeld decision that New York has "an interest
in ensuring that personal service can be accomplished on nonresident
attorneys admitted to practice here."

The Court then considered current law, citing provisions of the CPLR,
including 2103(b), and said that there are "currently several means of
service upon a nonresident attorney, including mail, overnight delivery,
fax and (where permitted) email...." It also noted that Court of Appeals
Rule 520.13(a), dealing with admissions to the Bar, requires nonresident
attorneys to designate the clerk of an Appellate Division as their agent
for service for actions related to legal services offered within the
state. It concluded, "the legislature always remains free to take any
additional action deemed necessary."

While the Court in Schoenefled was concerned with service on an out-of-
state attorney in a pending action, which is governed by CPLR 2103(b),
the law regarding service on an out-of-service party, including an
attorney named as a party, has changed significantly since 1909.  Until
the mid-1940s, there was a significant challenge to obtaining personal
jurisdiction over an attorney who resided and maintained an office out
of state who performed legal services within the state.  Since the
advent of "Long Arm Jurisdiction," and the enactment of CPLR 302(a),
obtaining jurisdiction over such an attorney is no longer problematic.

With modern day mechanisms for serving papers on attorneys not located
in the state and CPLR 302(a) providing a jurisdictional basis for
service outside the state, there is no reason to require a bricks and
mortar office as specified in section 470. The concerns that led to the
adoption of this section more than a century ago no longer exist, and
the current statutory prohibition serves no purpose in today's global
environment. Its repeal would not create any significant difficulties
arising from the lack of an attorney's physical office within the state.

 
LEGISLATIVE HISTORY:

S.5708 of 2019-2020 (Hoylman): Died in Judiciary

A.10425 of 2019-2020 (Weprin): Died in Judiciary

S700 (ACTIVE) - Bill Text download pdf

 
                     S T A T E   O F   N E W   Y O R K
 ________________________________________________________________________
 
                                    700
 
                        2021-2022 Regular Sessions
 
                             I N  S E N A T E
 
                                (PREFILED)
 
                              January 6, 2021
                                ___________
 
 Introduced  by  Sen. HOYLMAN -- read twice and ordered printed, and when
   printed to be committed to the Committee on Judiciary
 
 AN ACT to repeal section 470 of the judiciary law, relating to  allowing
   attorneys having offices in the state to reside in an adjoining state

   THE  PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
 BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
 
   Section 1. Section 470 of the judiciary law is REPEALED.
   § 2. This act shall take effect immediately.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                       [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                            LBD02645-01-1

Comments

Open Legislation comments facilitate discussion of New York State legislation. All comments are subject to moderation. Comments deemed off-topic, commercial, campaign-related, self-promotional; or that contain profanity or hate speech; or that link to sites outside of the nysenate.gov domain are not permitted, and will not be published. Comment moderation is generally performed Monday through Friday.

By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and verify you are over 13.

The New York State Senate

senate Bill S700

Sponsored By

Current Bill Status - Passed Senate

Your Voice

Actions

Votes

May 12, 2021 - floor Vote

Floor Vote: May 12, 2021

Apr 27, 2021 - Judiciary committee Vote

Judiciary Committee Vote: Apr 27, 2021

S700 (ACTIVE) - Details

S700 (ACTIVE) - Summary

S700 (ACTIVE) - Sponsor Memo

S700 (ACTIVE) - Bill Text download pdf

Comments

senate Bill S700

Share this bill

Sponsored By

Brad Hoylman

Current Bill Status - Passed Senate

Your Voice

Actions

Votes

May 12, 2021 - floor Vote

Floor Vote: May 12, 2021

Apr 27, 2021 - Judiciary committee Vote

Judiciary Committee Vote: Apr 27, 2021

S700 (ACTIVE) - Details

S700 (ACTIVE) - Summary

S700 (ACTIVE) - Sponsor Memo

S700 (ACTIVE) - Bill Text download pdf

Comments