S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________
10194
I N A S S E M B L Y
May 10, 2024
___________
Introduced by COMMITTEE ON RULES -- (at request of M. of A. Solages) --
read once and referred to the Committee on Codes
AN ACT to amend the penal law, in relation to the regulation of pistol
converters and convertible pistols
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Subdivision 1 of section 265.00 of the penal law is amended
and two new subdivisions 36 and 37 are added to read as follows:
1. "Machine-gun" means a weapon of any description, irrespective of
size, by whatever name known, loaded or unloaded, from which a number of
shots or bullets may be rapidly or automatically discharged from a maga-
zine with one continuous pull of the trigger and includes a sub-machine
gun, AND ALSO INCLUDES ANY CONVERTIBLE PISTOL THAT IS EQUIPPED WITH A
PISTOL CONVERTER.
36. "PISTOL CONVERTER" MEANS ANY DEVICE OR INSTRUMENT THAT WHEN
INSTALLED IN OR ATTACHED TO THE SLIDE OF A SEMI-AUTOMATIC PISTOL INTER-
FERES WITH THE TRIGGER MECHANISM AND THEREBY ENABLES THE PISTOL TO
DISCHARGE A NUMBER OF SHOTS OR BULLETS RAPIDLY OR AUTOMATICALLY WITH ONE
CONTINUOUS PULL OF THE TRIGGER.
37. "CONVERTIBLE PISTOL" MEANS ANY SEMI-AUTOMATIC PISTOL THAT CAN BE
CONVERTED INTO A MACHINE-GUN SOLELY BY THE INSTALLATION OR ATTACHMENT OF
A PISTOL CONVERTER.
§ 2. Subdivision 10 of section 265.02 of the penal law, as added by
chapter 1 of the laws of 2013, is amended and a new subdivision 11 is
added to read as follows:
(10) Such person possesses an unloaded firearm and also commits any
violent felony offense as defined in subdivision one of section 70.02 of
this chapter as part of the same criminal transaction[.]; OR
(11) SUCH PERSON KNOWINGLY POSSESSES ANY PISTOL CONVERTER.
§ 3. Subdivisions 1 and 2 of section 265.10 of the penal law, as sepa-
rately amended by chapters 34, 130, and 146 of the laws of 2019, are
amended and a new subdivision 10 is added to read as follows:
1. Any person who manufactures or causes to be manufactured any
machine-gun, PISTOL CONVERTER, assault weapon, large capacity ammunition
EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD15291-02-4
A. 10194 2
feeding device or disguised gun is guilty of a class D felony. Any
person who manufactures or causes to be manufactured any rapid-fire
modification device is guilty of a class E felony. Any person who manu-
factures or causes to be manufactured any switchblade knife, pilum
ballistic knife, metal knuckle knife, undetectable knife, billy,
blackjack, bludgeon, plastic knuckles, metal knuckles, Kung Fu star,
chuka stick, sandbag, sandclub or slungshot is guilty of a class A
misdemeanor.
2. Any person who transports or ships any machine-gun, PISTOL CONVERT-
ER, firearm silencer, assault weapon or large capacity ammunition feed-
ing device or disguised gun, or who transports or ships as merchandise
five or more firearms, is guilty of a class D felony. Any person who
transports or ships any rapid-fire modification device is guilty of a
class E felony. Any person who transports or ships as merchandise any
firearm, other than an assault weapon, switchblade knife, pilum ballis-
tic knife, undetectable knife, billy, blackjack, bludgeon, plastic
knuckles, metal knuckles, Kung Fu star, chuka stick, sandbag or slung-
shot is guilty of a class A misdemeanor.
10. ANY PERSON, DEALER, FIRM, PARTNERSHIP, OR CORPORATION WHO DISPOSES
OF OR WHO TRANSPORTS OR SHIPS AS MERCHANDISE A CONVERTIBLE PISTOL IS
GUILTY OF A CLASS D FELONY.
§ 4. Section 265.20 of the penal law is amended by adding a new subdi-
vision f to read as follows:
F. SUBDIVISION TEN OF SECTION 265.10 OF THIS ARTICLE SHALL NOT APPLY
TO THE DISPOSITION OF A CONVERTIBLE PISTOL TO, NOR TO THE TRANSPORT OR
SHIPPING AS MERCHANDISE OF A CONVERTIBLE PISTOL FOR DISPOSITION TO THE
FOLLOWING:
1. PERSONS IN THE MILITARY SERVICE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK WHEN DULY
AUTHORIZED BY REGULATIONS ISSUED BY THE ADJUTANT GENERAL TO POSSESS THE
SAME.
2. POLICE OFFICERS AS DEFINED IN SUBDIVISION THIRTY-FOUR OF SECTION
1.20 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW.
3. PEACE OFFICERS AS DEFINED BY SECTION 2.10 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
LAW.
4. PERSONS IN THE MILITARY OR OTHER SERVICE OF THE UNITED STATES, IN
PURSUIT OF OFFICIAL DUTY OR WHEN DULY AUTHORIZED BY FEDERAL LAW, REGU-
LATION OR ORDER TO POSSESS THE SAME.
5. PERSONS EMPLOYED IN FULFILLING DEFENSE CONTRACTS WITH THE GOVERN-
MENT OF THE UNITED STATES OR AGENCIES THEREOF WHEN POSSESSION OF THE
SAME IS NECESSARY FOR MANUFACTURE, TRANSPORT, INSTALLATION AND TESTING
UNDER THE REQUIREMENTS OF SUCH CONTRACT.
6. PERSONS ENGAGING IN THE BUSINESS OF GUNSMITH OR DEALER IN FIREARMS
TO WHOM A VALID LICENSE THEREFOR HAS BEEN ISSUED PURSUANT TO SECTION
400.00 OF THIS CHAPTER.
§ 5. This act shall take effect on the thirtieth day after it shall
have become a law.
This bill is unconstitutional on its face (see Caetano v Massachusetts, Heller v Washington DC & NYSR&PA v Bruen). This bill goes after the most common type of pistol (semi-automatic) and the most common manufacturer of semi-auto pistols (Glock) which are used for legal purposes. It's already against the law to convert a semi-auto firearm to full auto and it also already against the law to possess any part to make such a conversion. This bill is redundant to those laws. This bill will have a much more negative effect on lawful pistol owners than it will on career criminals who ignore all gun laws. Rather than propose or pass a bill that targets lawful gun owners, how about enforce existing laws and put career criminals behind bars rather than release them without bond to continue their assault on decent citizens.
This is explicitly unconstitutional in light of Bruen, Heller, and Caetano - the authors do not even attempt to justify this bill as constitutional (not that they could), even though that is their burden.
I am a registered democrat in NYS; go have your staffers check. It's these bills that have made me say: no more. The legislators and governor in this state do not care about our rights and do not even try to uphold their oaths to the constitution. They are sellouts to Bloomberg and his billionaire friends attempting to destroy our rights by disarming us.
Never again will I vote for a Democrat after these last few years of tyrannical legislation. This is extremely offensive to any law abiding citizen that understands the way government is supposed to function and that these legislators are supposed to work to protect our rights, not destroy them.
I am writing to you to express my strong opposition to this bill, and it's implications to ban semi-auto pistols that easily convert to automatic fire (allegedly). As I am sure that you are aware, since in or around 1986, it has been a federal crime to manufacture/register new machine guns in the U.S. New York state also has similar laws regulating the use of machine guns. Given that it is already illegal to produce devices that convert semi-auto pistols like a Glock Pistol into a machine gun, I fail to see how banning all such pistols that can easily accept those devices (allegedly) is a solution in keeping with the second amendment, as applied to the states via the fourteenth amendment. Advocates of gun control always state that these laws are made to keep the people safer, and yet here we are proposing another law because the existing gun laws have not lived up to the promise to protect us at the costs of our rights. If gun control works so well, and laws against devices from converting pistols into machine guns already exist, then why do we need to ban an entire class of pistols. Perhaps we should be enforcing existing laws, not letting criminals get off easy so that they can be released and kill police officers like Jonathan Diller and so many other innocents. We need to design laws that punish criminals, and we need to strictly enforce them. We do not need laws that target honest, law abiding citizens that have done nothing wrong. This legislation serves only to burden law abiding gun owners such as myself, who have already jumped through significant hoops to secure pistol permits via extensive background checks and other requirements. Additionally, this legislation will fail constitutional challenges. I cannot imagine any argument that semi-auto pistols are not in common use for lawful purposes, including but not limited to self-defense. I cannot see how it would survive a Bruen analysis. This proposed law is set up to fail. It is an insult to the bill of rights, and the people of New York State. I ask that you stand up for the rights of your constituents, and oppose this heinous bill.