Senate Bill S6196

2023-2024 Legislative Session

Compels the delivery of real property subject to a fraudulent transfer to the person entitled thereto

download bill text pdf

Archive: Last Bill Status - In Senate Committee Judiciary Committee

Introduced
- In Committee Assembly
- In Committee Senate
- On Floor Calendar Assembly
- On Floor Calendar Senate
- Passed Assembly
- Passed Senate
Delivered to Governor
Signed By Governor

Please enter your contact information

First Name

Last Name

Email Address

A valid email address is required.

Home address is used to determine the senate district in which you reside. Your support or opposition to this bill is then shared immediately with the senator who represents you.

Optional services from the NY State Senate:

Create an account. An account allows you to officially support or oppose key legislation, sign petitions with a single click, and follow issues, committees, and bills that matter to you. When you create an account, you agree to this platform's terms of participation.

Include a custom message for your Senator? (Optional)

Enter a message to your senator. Many New Yorkers use this to share the reasoning behind their support or opposition to the bill. Others might share a personal anecdote about how the bill would affect them or people they care about.

Actions

View Actions

Date of Action	Assembly Actions - Lowercase Senate Actions - UPPERCASE
Jan 03, 2024	referred to judiciary
Apr 03, 2023	referred to judiciary

2023-S6196 (ACTIVE) - Details

Current Committee:: Senate Judiciary
Law Section:: Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law
Laws Affected:: Amd §221, RPAP L
Versions Introduced in Other Legislative Sessions:: 2019-2020: S4638
2021-2022: S4997
2025-2026: S4238

2023-S6196 (ACTIVE) - Summary

Compels the delivery of real property subject to a fraudulent transfer to the person entitled thereto; provides for the recording of judgments and orders relating to a fraudulent conveyance of title to property.

2023-S6196 (ACTIVE) - Sponsor Memo

                                 
BILL NUMBER: S6196

SPONSOR: PARKER
 
TITLE OF BILL:

An act to amend the real property actions and proceedings law, in
relation to compelling the delivery of real property subject to a frau-
dulent transfer to the person entitled thereto and provides for the
recording of judgments and orders relating to a fraudulent conveyance of
title to property

 
PURPOSE:

To permit any civil or criminal court of competent jurisdiction that has
determined in its findings that the conveyance of transfer of real prop-
erty title fraudulent, to be granted the authority to issue an order
restoring the title to the last owner of the property that obtained
title as of right.

 
SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS:

Section 1: Section 221 of the real property actions and proceedings law,

as amended by chapter 507 of the laws of 2009, is amended.

Section 2: This act shall take effect immediately.

 
JUSTIFICATION:

The current method of deed recording based upon a process of sale and
transfer of real property is filled with loopholes and opportunities for
dishonest operators to steal and transfer property without timely
discovery of the fraudulent act. By the time the fraud is discovered,
title has often switched hands several times, leaving a trail of deceit
which is costly and difficult to correct. For example, in the case of
People vs. George Marks, under Indictment Number 2479-2008, Mr. Marks
was found guilty of several counts of Grand Larceny and Falsifying Busi-
ness s Records, in relation to stealing property belonging to a deceased
owner of two properties valued in excess of $1,000,000. Mr. Marks was
convicted and sentenced to years in prison; yet he has been able to
continue claiming ownership of the property while serving time, display-
ing the gall to retain a management company to collect rent and manage
the properties while he serves his time for the crime.

Although convicted and sentenced for stealing property, the recording
clerk's office maintains that Mr. Marks is the recorded owner of the
property. And due to the fact that the lawful owner is deceased and has
no known heirs, except for the actions of a friend of the genuine owner
who has persistently kept the authorities of the continued theft of the
property, Mr. Marks, the convicted fraudster, would without a doubt, on
his release from prison, be able to sell and benefit from the property
he does not lawfully own.

There is currently no clear and easy process to restore a stolen title
to the lawful owner. In cases where the lawful owner is deceased and no
known interested parties are available to protect the lawful ownership
of the property and rights of unknown heirs to inherit the property,
this law would empower the courts to act to ensure that fraudsters are
not able to steal and benefit from the theft of the property of a
deceased owner even after conviction of theft.
 
PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY:

2021-22: S4997 - Referred to Judiciary

2019-20: S.4638-Referred to Judiciary

 
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

None to the State.

 
EFFECTIVE DATE:
This act shall take effect immediately.

2023-S6196 (ACTIVE) - Bill Text download pdf

                             
                     S T A T E   O F   N E W   Y O R K
 ________________________________________________________________________
 
                                   6196
 
                        2023-2024 Regular Sessions
 
                             I N  S E N A T E
 
                               April 3, 2023
                                ___________
 
 Introduced  by  Sen.  PARKER -- read twice and ordered printed, and when
   printed to be committed to the Committee on Judiciary
 
 AN ACT to amend the  real  property  actions  and  proceedings  law,  in
   relation  to  compelling  the  delivery  of real property subject to a
   fraudulent transfer to the person entitled thereto  and  provides  for
   the recording of judgments and orders relating to a fraudulent convey-
   ance of title to property
 
   THE  PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
 BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
 
   Section 1. Section 221 of the real property  actions  and  proceedings
 law,  as  amended by chapter 507 of the laws of 2009, is amended to read
 as follows:
   § 221. Compelling delivery of possession  of  real  property.  1.  (A)
 Where a judgment affecting the title to, or the possession, enjoyment or
 use  of,  real  property  allots to any person a distinct parcel of real
 property, or contains a direction for the  sale  of  real  property,  or
 confirms  such  an allotment or sale, it also may direct the delivery of
 the possession of the property to the person entitled  thereto,  subject
 to the rights and obligations set forth in section thirteen hundred five
 of this chapter.
   (B) UPON A FINDING BY A CIVIL OR CRIMINAL COURT OF COMPETENT JURISDIC-
 TION  THAT A TRANSFER OF TITLE TO REAL PROPERTY WAS EFFECTED IN WHOLE OR
 IN PART BY FRAUD, THE COURT IN ITS WRITTEN  JUDGMENT  SHALL  DIRECT  THE
 DELIVERY  OF  THE POSSESSION OF THE PROPERTY TO THE PERSON WHO OR ENTITY
 THAT THE COURT FINDS TO BE THE LAST BONA  FIDE  OWNER  OF  THE  PROPERTY
 PRIOR  TO  THE  FRAUDULENT  TRANSFER AND SHALL DIRECT THAT TITLE TO SUCH
 PROPERTY BE RESTORED TO SUCH PERSON OR ENTITY. THE COURT  SHALL  ARRANGE
 FOR  THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER TO BE PROVIDED TO THE OFFICES OF THE RECORD-
 ING CLERK FOR THE COUNTY OR CITY IN WHICH THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED.   THE
 RECORDING CLERK SHALL PROMPTLY RECORD THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER AND PLACE A
 NOTATION  ON  ANY  DOCUMENTS  DEEMED  FRAUDULENT BY THE COURT AND ON ANY
 
  EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                       [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                            LBD07576-01-3

 S. 6196                             2
 
 DOCUMENTS RELATING TO SUBSEQUENT CONVEYANCES OF TITLE THAT WERE  DEPEND-
 ENT  UPON  THE  FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCE AND DOCUMENTS. SUCH NOTATION SHALL
 REFERENCE THE JUDGMENT AND  ORDER AND INDICATE THE NAME OF THE PERSON OR
 ENTITY LEGALLY ENTITLED TO POSSESSION OF AND TITLE TO THE PROPERTY.
   (C) AT THE TIME OF ISSUANCE OF A JUDGMENT AND ORDER NULLIFYING A FRAU-
 DULENT   TRANSFER  OF  TITLE  TO  PROPERTY  AND  DIRECTING  DELIVERY  OF
 POSSESSION OF THE PROPERTY TO THE PERSON ENTITLED THERETO, AS  DESCRIBED
 IN  PARAGRAPH  (B)  OF THIS SUBDIVISION, THE COURT ISSUING SUCH JUDGMENT
 AND ORDER SHALL PROVIDE NOTICE OF THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER TO  ANY  PERSON
 OR ENTITY NOT A PARTY TO THE PROCEEDINGS WHO OR THAT ASSERTS AN INTEREST
 OF  RECORD  IN  AND  TO THE FRAUDULENTLY TRANSFERRED PROPERTY BASED UPON
 SUBSEQUENT CONVEYANCES OF TITLE THAT WERE DEPENDENT UPON  THE FRAUDULENT
 CONVEYANCE AND DOCUMENTS. SUCH PERSON OR ENTITY SHALL BE  PROVIDED  WITH
 AN  OPPORTUNITY  TO BE HEARD BEFORE THE COURT WITHIN SIXTY DAYS OF BEING
 SERVED WITH THE NOTICE OF ORDER FOR THE PURPOSE OF PRESERVING HIS OR HER
 INTERESTS IN THE PROPERTY.
   2. If a party, or his OR HER representative or successor, who is bound
 by the judgment, withholds possession from the person thus  declared  to
 be  entitled  thereto,  the  court, by order, in its discretion, besides
 punishing the disobedience as a contempt, may require the sheriff to put
 that person into possession. Such an order shall be executed  as  if  it
 were an execution for the delivery of the possession of the property.
   § 2. This act shall take effect immediately.

Comments

Open Legislation is a forum for New York State legislation. All comments are subject to review and community moderation is encouraged.

Comments deemed off-topic, commercial, campaign-related, self-promotional; or that contain profanity, hate or toxic speech; or that link to sites outside of the nysenate.gov domain are not permitted, and will not be published. Attempts to intimidate and silence contributors or deliberately deceive the public, including excessive or extraneous posting/posts, or coordinated activity, are prohibited and may result in the temporary or permanent banning of the user. Comment moderation is generally performed Monday through Friday. By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and verify you are over 13.

Dan_Blumenthal

1 year ago

As a practitioner concentrating in real property litigation and the practice commentator for the RPAPL volumes of McKinney’s NY Statutes, I read your bill to amend RPAPL 221 and find it duplicative. RPAPL 221 is the codification of the ancient writ of assistance, permitting a possessory judgment holder to seek the assistance of a sheriff to execute on the judgment. The many causes that can result in a possessory judgment are found elsewhere in various statutes. RPAPL articles 15 and 19 already address clouds on title. I urge reconsideration of the need or statutory positioning of this bill.

Create an account. An account allows you to sign petitions with a single click, officially support or oppose key legislation, and follow issues, committees, and bills that matter to you. When you create an account, you agree to this platform's terms of participation.

Find your Senator and share your views on important issues.

Do you support this bill?

Senate Bill S6196

Sponsored By

Archive: Last Bill Status - In Senate Committee Judiciary Committee

Actions

2023-S6196 (ACTIVE) - Details

2023-S6196 (ACTIVE) - Summary

2023-S6196 (ACTIVE) - Sponsor Memo

2023-S6196 (ACTIVE) - Bill Text download pdf

Comments

Do you support this bill?

Get Status Alerts for 2023-S6196

Senate Bill S6196

Share this bill

Sponsored By

Kevin S. Parker

Archive: Last Bill Status - In Senate Committee Judiciary Committee

Actions

2023-S6196 (ACTIVE) - Details

2023-S6196 (ACTIVE) - Summary

2023-S6196 (ACTIVE) - Sponsor Memo

2023-S6196 (ACTIVE) - Bill Text download pdf

Comments