S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________
9134
I N S E N A T E
April 30, 2024
___________
Introduced by Sen. COONEY -- read twice and ordered printed, and when
printed to be committed to the Committee on Energy and Telecommuni-
cations
AN ACT to amend the general municipal law, in relation to requiring
substantially similar permits for broadband deployment to be processed
together at the same time and on an expedited basis
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. This act shall be known and may be cited as the "broadband
deployment assistance act of 2024".
§ 2. Legislative intent. The legislature finds and declares that the
public's increased reliance on high-speed internet access for work,
telehealth, emergency response, education and commerce demonstrates the
need for legislation to accelerate the deployment of broadband infras-
tructure. The length of time it takes for a local jurisdiction to proc-
ess permits for broadband projects directly impacts the length of time
it takes before a project can provide high-speed internet service to a
local community and get people connected. The State's Broadband Equity,
Access, and Deployment Program proposal identified streamlining the
permitting process as a critical component in the program's success.
Consistent with these findings, the measures set forth in this legis-
lation will accelerate broadband deployment, to the benefit of the
people of the state.
The legislature further finds and declares that processing several
substantially similar broadband permit applications at the same time
will not only allow local governments to continue to receive permit
fees, but will also enable their staffs to process broadband permits
more efficiently, as a group, and thus to help bridge the digital divide
and more quickly connect communities to high-speed internet. This will
allow the state to make efficient use of incoming broadband funding
while creating greater broadband equity among communities so more indi-
viduals can have access to high-speed internet access for emergency
response, remote work, telehealth, education and commerce.
EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD14408-02-4
S. 9134 2
§ 3. The general municipal law is amended by adding a new article 13-E
to read as follows:
ARTICLE 13-E
BROADBAND
SECTION 300. DEFINITIONS.
301. PERMITS FOR BROADBAND PROJECTS.
§ 300. DEFINITIONS. FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS ARTICLE, THE FOLLOWING
TERMS SHALL HAVE THE FOLLOWING MEANINGS UNLESS THE CONTEXT INDICATES
OTHERWISE:
1. "BATCH BROADBAND PERMIT PROCESSING" MEANS THE SIMULTANEOUS PROCESS-
ING OF MORE THAN ONE SUBSTANTIALLY SIMILAR BROADBAND PERMIT APPLICATION.
2. "BROADBAND PERMIT APPLICATION" MEANS AN APPLICATION OR OTHER
REQUEST FOR APPROVAL SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW TO A MUNICIPALITY IN ORDER TO
AUTHORIZE THE CONSTRUCTION OR ANY PORTION OR STAGE OF THE CONSTRUCTION
OF A FACILITY, INCLUDING MULTIPLE APPLICATIONS OR PERMITS REQUIRED AND
ASSOCIATED WITH THE SAME FACILITY.
3. "FACILITY" MEANS, BUT SHALL NOT BE LIMITED TO, CABLE OF ANY TYPE,
INCLUDING ASSOCIATED ELECTRONICS, WIRELESS TRANSMISSION OR RECEPTION
EQUIPMENT, OR ANY OTHER TYPE OF EQUIPMENT USED IN WHOLE OR IN PART FOR
THE TRANSPORT OF DATA, VIDEO OR VOICE COMMUNICATIONS OR SERVICES BY WIRE
OR RADIO.
4. "INITIAL APPLICATION REQUIREMENT" MEANS THE FIRST STEP REQUIRED BY
A MUNICIPALITY FOR AN APPLICANT TO INITIATE A BROADBAND PERMIT APPLICA-
TION, WHICH MAY BE, BUT SHALL NOT BE LIMITED TO, THE FILING OF A PERMIT
APPLICATION OR THE SCHEDULING OF A PRE-APPLICATION MEETING, WHICHEVER
OCCURS EARLIER.
5. "PRESUMPTIVELY REASONABLE TIME" MEANS SIXTY DAYS FOR ATTACHING
FACILITIES TO EXISTING STRUCTURES OR NINETY DAYS FOR ATTACHING FACILI-
TIES TO NEW STRUCTURES, IN EITHER CASE FOLLOWING THE APPLICANT'S
COMPLETION OF THE INITIAL APPLICATION REQUIREMENT, EXCEPT AS MODIFIED BY
A MUTUAL, WRITTEN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE MUNICIPALITY AND THE APPLICANT;
PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT IF THE MUNICIPALITY PROVIDES A DETERMINATION
BACKED BY SUBSTANTIAL WRITTEN EVIDENCE THAT MORE TIME FOR REVIEW OF THE
BROADBAND PERMIT APPLICATION IS NEEDED, THE MINIMUM NEEDED TIME, AS SET
FORTH IN THE DETERMINATION, SHALL APPLY. IF AN APPLICANT BELIEVES THAT
SUCH A DETERMINATION IS INSUFFICIENTLY SUPPORTED, THE APPLICANT MAY SEEK
REVIEW OF THE DETERMINATION IN A PROCEEDING PURSUANT TO ARTICLE SEVEN-
TY-EIGHT OF THE CIVIL PRACTICE LAW AND RULES. THE PROCEEDING SHALL BE
GIVEN PREFERENCE AND SHALL BE BROUGHT ON FOR ARGUMENT ON SUCH TERMS AND
CONDITIONS AS THE PRESIDING JUSTICE MAY DIRECT, NOT TO EXCEED FORTY-FIVE
DAYS. IN ANY SUCH PROCEEDING, THE MUNICIPALITY SHALL BEAR THE BURDEN OF
PROOF.
6. "SUBSTANTIALLY SIMILAR BROADBAND PERMIT APPLICATIONS" MEANS BROAD-
BAND PERMIT APPLICATIONS THAT SHARE SUBSTANTIAL COMMONALITIES IN TERMS
OF PURPOSE, EQUIPMENT, LOCATION, OR GENERAL DESIGN.
§ 301. PERMITS FOR BROADBAND PROJECTS. 1. UPON RECEIPT OF UP TO THIRTY
SUBSTANTIALLY SIMILAR BROADBAND PERMIT APPLICATIONS FROM A SINGLE APPLI-
CANT, THE MUNICIPALITY SHALL PROCESS SUCH APPLICATIONS AT THE SAME TIME
AND ON AN EXPEDITED BASIS WITHIN A PRESUMPTIVELY REASONABLE TIME. THE
APPLICANT SHALL EXPLICITLY IDENTIFY THE APPLICATIONS FOR WHICH SUCH
BATCH BROADBAND PERMIT PROCESSING IS REQUESTED. THE APPLICANT SHALL HAVE
THE DISCRETION TO FILE A CONSOLIDATED APPLICATION. THE MUNICIPALITY MAY
NOT REFUSE TO ACCEPT SUCH APPLICATIONS IN ORDER TO DEFER THE START OF
THE PRESUMPTIVELY REASONABLE TIME PERIOD.
2. ONCE A BROADBAND PERMIT APPLICATION IS SUBMITTED, EITHER AT THE
TIME OF THE INITIAL APPLICATION REQUIREMENT OR SUBSEQUENTLY, THE MUNICI-
S. 9134 3
PALITY SHALL NOTIFY THE APPLICANT IN WRITING WITHIN TEN DAYS OF SUCH
APPLICATION SUBMISSION IF THE APPLICATION IS MATERIALLY INCOMPLETE. SUCH
NOTICE SHALL CLEARLY AND SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFY ALL DOCUMENTS OR INFORMA-
TION ALLEGED TO BE MISSING FROM THE APPLICATION, AND SHALL SPECIFY THE
RELATED CODE PROVISION, ORDINANCE, APPLICATION INSTRUCTION OR OTHERWISE
PUBLICLY-STATED PROCEDURES RELATED TO THE ALLEGED MISSING INFORMATION.
THE ISSUANCE OF SUCH A NOTICE SHALL NOT TOLL OR OTHERWISE AFFECT THE
RUNNING OF THE PRESUMPTIVELY REASONABLE TIME, UNLESS SUCH TIME IS MEAS-
URED FROM THE FILING OF THE PERMIT APPLICATION, IN WHICH CASE THE SIXTY-
OR NINETY-DAY PERIOD SHALL RESTART AT THE TIME THAT THE APPLICANT
SUBMITS THE COMPLETE APPLICATION.
3. IF A MUNICIPALITY DOES NOT APPROVE SUCH SUBSTANTIALLY SIMILAR
BROADBAND PERMIT APPLICATIONS SUBMITTED FOR BATCH BROADBAND PERMIT PROC-
ESSING, OR ISSUE PERMITS OR OTHER REQUIRED AUTHORIZATIONS PURSUANT TO
SUCH APPLICATIONS, WITHIN THE PRESUMPTIVELY REASONABLE TIME, ALL THE
PERMITS IN THE BATCH SHALL BE DEEMED APPROVED.
4. IF A MUNICIPALITY DETERMINES THAT ONE OR MORE OF THE PERMITS
SUBMITTED FOR BATCH BROADBAND PERMIT PROCESSING ARE NOT APPROVED, SUCH
DENIAL SHALL NOT AFFECT THE TIMELY AND EXPEDITED PROCESSING OF THE
REMAINING PERMITS. IF THE FINAL DECISION IS TO DENY THE APPLICATION, THE
FINAL DECISION DOCUMENT SHALL STATE THE BASIS FOR SUCH DENIAL, INCLUDING
SPECIFIC CODE PROVISIONS ON WHICH THE DENIAL WAS BASED, AND SEND THE
DECISION DOCUMENT TO THE APPLICANT ON OR BEFORE THE DAY OF DENIAL.
5. A PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION GRANTED PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION SHALL BE
VALID FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR AFTER ISSUANCE UNLESS THE JURISDICTION
AND APPLICANT AGREE TO EXTEND THE ONE-YEAR PERIOD OR DELAY IS CAUSED BY
EVENTS OUTSIDE OF THE REASONABLE CONTROL OF THE APPLICANT.
6. WHERE LIMITED RESOURCES AFFECT A MUNICIPALITY'S ABILITY TO PROCESS
BATCHED BROADBAND PERMIT APPLICATIONS, A MUNICIPALITY SHALL WORK WITH
THE APPLICANT IN GOOD FAITH TO RESOLVE THOSE RESOURCE LIMITATIONS, WHICH
MAY INCLUDE, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO, PROVISION BY THE APPLICANT OF
SUPPLEMENTAL RESOURCES.
7. FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS ARTICLE, A PERIOD OF TIME EXPRESSED AS A
NUMBER OF DAYS SHALL BE COMPUTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION TWENTY OF
THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LAW.
8. THIS ARTICLE SHALL NOT APPLY TO CITIES WITH A POPULATION OF ONE
MILLION OR GREATER.
§ 4. This act shall take effect on the ninetieth day after it shall
have become a law.