S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________
10887
I N A S S E M B L Y
April 8, 2026
___________
Introduced by M. of A. MAHER -- read once and referred to the Committee
on Education
AN ACT to amend the education law, in relation to establishing an inno-
vative learning grant program
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Short title. This act shall be known and may be cited as
the "New York innovative learning models act".
§ 2. Findings and purposes. 1. The legislature finds that:
a. Rapid shifts in technology, workforce needs and educational deliv-
ery methods call for more flexible and innovative learning models;
b. Students in New York state benefit from expanded opportunities that
complement traditional classroom instruction through blended, project-
based, competency-based, and other models of learning;
c. To maintain and enhance the competitiveness of New York's economy
and meet the needs of employers and communities, the state must support
schools and education entities in designing, implementing, and scaling
such innovative models; and
d. A state-led grant program can incentivize and accelerate the
adoption and continuous improvement of innovative learning models across
the state's varied school districts and types of educational insti-
tutions.
2. It is the purpose of this act to:
a. Establish a competitive grant program that supports local educa-
tional agencies, districts, charter schools, and other eligible entities
in the development and implementation of innovative learning models;
b. Promote research, evaluation and dissemination of best practices
for such models; and
c. Ensure accountability and continuous improvement of participating
models to improve student outcomes, including academic achievement,
college and career readiness, and equity in access.
§ 3. The education law is amended by adding a new section 3602-g to
read as follows:
EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD14683-01-6
A. 10887 2
§ 3602-G. INNOVATIVE LEARNING GRANT PROGRAM. 1. DEFINITIONS. AS USED
IN THIS SECTION, THE FOLLOWING TERMS SHALL HAVE THE FOLLOWING MEANINGS:
A. "LOCAL EDUCATION AGENCY" MEANS A PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT, PUBLIC
CHARTER SCHOOL, BOARD OF COOPERATIVE EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, OR OTHER
PUBLIC SCHOOL ENTITY UNDER STATE LAW.
B. "ELIGIBLE ENTITY" MEANS A LOCAL EDUCATION AGENCY OR A PARTNERSHIP
THEREOF. FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, ENTITIES THAT HAVE PARTNER-
SHIPS WITH LOCAL EDUCATION AGENCIES MAY INCLUDE, BUT NEED NOT BE LIMITED
TO, INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION, NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS, OR COMMU-
NITY-BASED ORGANIZATIONS THAT PROPOSE TO PLAN, DEVELOP OR IMPLEMENT AN
INNOVATIVE LEARNING MODEL.
C. "INNOVATIVE LEARNING MODEL" MEANS A SCHOOL OR INSTRUCTIONAL MODEL
THAT:
(I) FUNDAMENTALLY REDESIGNS THE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT AND USES BLENDED,
PERSONALIZED, COMPETENCY-BASED, AND STUDENT-DRIVEN APPROACHES;
(II) INCLUDES FLEXIBLE SCHEDULING, MODULAR CURRICULA, ADAPTIVE TECH-
NOLOGIES, PROJECT-BASED OR EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING;
(III) DEMONSTRATES POTENTIAL FOR IMPROVING STUDENT OUTCOMES, ESPECIAL-
LY FOR HISTORICALLY UNDERSERVED POPULATIONS; AND
(IV) HAS A CLEARLY DEFINED EVALUATION PLAN AND INTENDS TO SCALE OR
REPLICATE IF EFFECTIVE.
2. INNOVATIVE LEARNING GRANT PROGRAM. A. THE DEPARTMENT, IN CONSULTA-
TION WITH THE REGENTS, SHALL ESTABLISH AN INNOVATIVE LEARNING GRANT
PROGRAM. WITHIN AMOUNTS APPROPRIATED OR OTHERWISE AVAILABLE THEREFOR,
THE DEPARTMENT SHALL AWARD GRANTS TO ELIGIBLE ENTITIES FOR THE PLANNING,
DEVELOPMENT, IMPLEMENTATION, REPLICATION AND SCALING OF INNOVATIVE
LEARNING MODELS.
B. NO LATER THAN TWELVE MONTHS AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS
SECTION AND ANNUALLY THEREAFTER, THE DEPARTMENT SHALL PUBLISH NOTICE OF
THE AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS, APPLICATION PROCEDURES, SELECTION CRITERIA,
PERFORMANCE EXPECTATIONS AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS OF THE GRANT
PROGRAM.
C. THE DEPARTMENT SHALL GIVE PRIORITY TO PROPOSALS THAT:
(I) FOCUS ON UNDERSERVED STUDENT POPULATIONS, INCLUDING STUDENTS WITH
DISABILITIES, ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS, ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
STUDENTS, AND RURAL OR URBAN HIGH-NEED DISTRICTS;
(II) DEMONSTRATE PARTNERSHIPS ACROSS SECTORS (E.G., K-12, HIGHER
EDUCATION, BUSINESS, NONPROFIT);
(III) INCLUDE RIGOROUS EVALUATION AND MEASUREMENT OF STUDENT OUTCOMES;
AND
(IV) HAVE A PLAN FOR SUSTAINABILITY AND POTENTIAL FOR REPLICATION.
D. AN ELIGIBLE ENTITY THAT RECEIVES A GRANT PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION
MAY USE SUCH GRANT FUNDS FOR ACTIVITIES INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO:
(I) DESIGNING OR REDESIGNING CURRICULA AND INSTRUCTIONAL MODELS;
(II) PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EDUCATORS AND STAFF IN NEW LEARNING
MODELS;
(III) TECHNOLOGY ACQUISITION AND INFRASTRUCTURE TO SUPPORT BLENDED OR
ADAPTIVE LEARNING;
(IV) PILOT IMPLEMENTATION OF THE INNOVATIVE MODEL;
(V) DATA SYSTEMS AND ASSESSMENT TOOLS ALIGNED TO THE MODEL; AND
(VI) SCALING OR REPLICATION OF SUCCESSFUL MODELS ACROSS ADDITIONAL
SCHOOLS OR DISTRICTS.
E. THE GRANT PROGRAM MAY INCLUDE TIERS OF AWARDS PROVIDED THAT THERE
ARE APPROPRIATE PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS FOR EACH TIER. FOR THE PURPOSES
OF THIS SECTION, TIERS OF AWARDS MAY INCLUDE, BUT NEED NOT BE LIMITED
TO, PLANNING GRANTS, IMPLEMENTATION GRANTS, AND SCALE-UP GRANTS.
A. 10887 3
F. THE DEPARTMENT SHALL COORDINATE DISSEMINATION OF SUCCESSFUL INNOVA-
TIVE LEARNING MODELS, BEST PRACTICES, AND LESSONS LEARNED STATEWIDE,
INCLUDING THROUGH WEBINARS, REPORTS AND STATE EDUCATION CONFERENCES.
3. EVALUATION, REPORTING AND ACCOUNTABILITY. A. EACH GRANTEE SHALL
SUBMIT ANNUAL REPORTS TO THE DEPARTMENT, INCLUDING BASELINE AND OUTCOME
DATA, IMPLEMENTATION MILESTONES, FIDELITY OF MODEL, COST-EFFECTIVENESS,
AND PLANS FOR FUTURE PHASES.
B. THE DEPARTMENT SHALL COMPILE AND PUBLISH A STATEWIDE ANNUAL REPORT
ON THE GRANT PROGRAM. SUCH REPORT SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NEED NOT BE LIMITED
TO, THE FOLLOWING DATA:
(I) THE NUMBER OF GRANTS AWARDED;
(II) THE TYPES OF MODELS SUPPORTED;
(III) THE STUDENT DEMOGRAPHICS SERVED;
(IV) STUDENT OUTCOMES;
(V) COST METRICS; AND
(VI) POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS.
C. THE DEPARTMENT SHALL CONDUCT OR CONTRACT FOR AN INDEPENDENT EVALU-
ATION OF THE OVERALL GRANT PROGRAM EVERY THREE YEARS. SUCH EVALUATION
SHALL ASSESS STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT, GRADUATION RATES, COLLEGE OR CAREER
READINESS, EQUITY IMPACTS, AND SCALABILITY OF MODELS.
D. THE DEPARTMENT AND THE REGENTS MAY SUSPEND OR TERMINATE FUNDING FOR
A GRANTEE THAT:
(I) FAILS TO MEET AGREED PERFORMANCE TARGETS;
(II) FAILS TO SUBMIT REQUIRED REPORTS; OR
(III) DOES NOT MAINTAIN FISCAL ACCOUNTABILITY.
4. NOTHING IN THIS SECTION SHALL BE CONSTRUED TO RESTRICT THE AUTHORI-
TY OF THE DEPARTMENT TO ENFORCE EXISTING STATE LAW, REGULATIONS AND
OVERSIGHT OF LOCAL EDUCATION AGENCIES.
§ 4. The department of education is hereby authorized to promulgate
any rules or regulations necessary for the implementation of this act.
§ 5. Severability clause. If any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivi-
sion, section or part of this act shall be adjudged by any court of
competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such judgment shall not affect,
impair, or invalidate the remainder thereof, but shall be confined in
its operation to the clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section
or part thereof directly involved in the controversy in which such judg-
ment shall have been rendered. It is hereby declared to be the intent of
the legislature that this act would have been enacted even if such
invalid provisions had not been included herein.
§ 6. This act shall take effect immediately.