A. 11433 2
tives, nuclear power facilities present major opportunity costs that can
delay and undermine achievement of the CLCPA's mandates.
7. The Climate Action Council's 2022 Scoping Plan calls for a rigor-
ous, comprehensive evaluation of nuclear power facilities, including its
costs, safety, environmental and health impacts, waste disposal, and
alternatives. Such an evaluation has not been done.
8. No comprehensive, independent, and publicly available financial,
environmental, or health assessment of new nuclear power facilities in
New York has been conducted, despite recommendations and evidence that
such projects may impose major costs and risks to ratepayers and taxpay-
ers.
9. Nuclear power facilities pose inherent safety and environmental
risks, including potential catastrophic accidents, long-term radioactive
waste with no permanent disposal solution, and significant public health
concerns for surrounding communities.
10. Federal liability limits under the Price-Anderson Act expose New
York residents and taxpayers to potentially enormous financial risks in
the event of an accident at a nuclear power facility.
11. Long-term radioactive waste management presents unresolved and
costly challenges, with existing waste in New York already requiring
perpetual storage and significant ongoing expense.
12. Scientific research indicates potential adverse health impacts for
communities located near nuclear facilities, including increased cancer
mortality and radioactive contamination of indoor dust and soil in homes
near nuclear power facilities, warranting further public health and
environmental investigation.
Therefore, the legislature of the state of New York adopts a two-year
and six-month moratorium on funding, subsidies, tax credits, bonding
authority, or other financial commitments for new nuclear power facili-
ties by state agencies, authorities, or commissions. A comprehensive,
evidence-based assessment will be conducted during this time to analyze
the expense, health, safety, security, opportunity costs, community
impact and environmental impacts of nuclear power facilities, including
but not limited to, mining and fuel production, construction, operation,
nuclear waste long-term management, site and off-site remediation, and a
comparison to alternative energy sources.
§ 3. Definitions. For the purposes of this act, the following terms
shall have the following meanings:
1. "Nuclear power facility" shall mean any electricity generating
plant that uses nuclear fission or related nuclear technology to produce
electricity.
2. "State agency" shall mean any state board, body, bureau, commis-
sion, council, department, public authority, public corporation, divi-
sion, office or other governmental entity performing a governmental or
proprietary function for the state.
3. "Subsidy" shall mean any expenditure funded by ratepayers and/or
taxpayers, including, but not limited to, a fee, surcharge, credit, loan
guarantees or premium charge added to customer bills or any state
expenditure designed to plan, promote, underwrite, construct or increase
the revenue of a nuclear power facility.
§ 4. Prohibition of subsidies. Notwithstanding any other provision of
law, for a period commencing on the effective date of this act and
ending thirty months thereafter, no state agency shall approve, imple-
ment, or authorize any program that provides financial assistance,
including but not limited to, zero-emission credits, clean energy stand-
ard credits, bond proceeds, ratepayer-funded surcharges or subsidies, or
A. 11433 3
taxpayer-funded appropriations, to plan, promote, underwrite, construct
any new nuclear power facility or related entity. Funding for existing
planning, promotion, underwriting, construction or any state-funded
activity on new nuclear power facilities shall be placed on hold for
thirty months beginning on the effective date of this act.
§ 5. Prohibition of renewable energy funds for nuclear projects.
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for a period commencing on
the effective date of this act and ending thirty months thereafter, no
funds dedicated to supporting renewable energy projects, energy effi-
ciency programs, climate mitigation, or grid modernization shall be
diverted to support the new or continued planning, promotion,
construction or operation of new nuclear power facilities.
§ 6. Nuclear assessment task force. 1. (a) (i) There is hereby estab-
lished a task force on nuclear assessment, which shall consist of
fifteen members to be appointed as follows: (1) six members appointed by
the temporary president of the senate; (2) six members appointed by the
speaker of the assembly; (3) two members appointed by the office of the
state comptroller; and (4) one member appointed by the attorney general.
(ii) No member of the task force shall be appointed who holds or
retains any past or current relation to or financial interest in an
electric utility corporation or nuclear power corporation.
(iii) For the purposes of this act, the term "task force" shall mean
the task force on nuclear assessment established pursuant to subpara-
graph (i) of this paragraph.
(b) At a minimum, nine of the fifteen members of the task force
appointed pursuant to paragraph (a) of this subdivision shall be repre-
sentatives impacted by nuclear power facilities as follows: (i) six
representatives from non-profit environmental organizations and communi-
ty organizations; and (ii) three tribal nation representatives.
(c) Each member of the task force shall have demonstrated expertise in
at least one of the following areas: grid modernization, renewable ener-
gy, environmental sciences, security, toxicology, medicine, particularly
in pediatrics, public health, or economics.
(d) The task force shall meet at least every two months at the call of
the chair, who shall be elected by the members of the task force. Meet-
ings may be held via teleconference. Special meetings may be called by
the chair at the request of a majority of the members of the task force.
(e) The task force shall create an environmental justice subcommittee
of no less than five of its members to examine, evaluate and assess any
and all environmental justice issues that may be related to the
construction of new nuclear power facilities, including issues relating
to mining for uranium, the placement of potential nuclear power facili-
ties in or near low income areas, the potential impact to the ecosystem,
and the impact of exposure to radioactive and toxic emissions on local
populations including any disproportionate impacts based on gender, age
or ethnicity.
(f) Each member of the task force shall receive the sum of four
hundred dollars for each day in which such member is engaged in the
performance of their duties in accordance with this section. Every
member shall be entitled to receive reimbursement for the actual and
necessary expenses incurred by such member in the performance of such
duties.
(g) The task force shall have the authority to engage consultants,
engineers, scientists, economists, doctors, non-profit organizations,
and universities as such task force may deem necessary to carry out the
duties and responsibilities of this act.
A. 11433 4
2. The task force and its selected contractors shall:
(a) Examine, evaluate and assess the potential cost of constructing
new nuclear power facilities in the state, taking into consideration
recent nuclear power projects undertaken elsewhere in the country, and
the financial impact of such construction on ratepayers and taxpayers in
the state, particularly the likelihood of significant utility rate
increases. Such examination, evaluation and assessment shall include,
but not be limited to, the following:
(i) quantitative and qualitative analysis and modeling of the finan-
cial costs to ratepayers and taxpayers over sixty years, or the
evidence-based projected life of nuclear power facilities, including
small modular reactors;
(ii) comparison of past cost estimates and actual costs of building
both existing nuclear power facilities and cancelled nuclear power
facilities in the U.S. and elsewhere;
(iii) the cost of each of the existing nuclear power facilities'
radioactive waste in the state and the estimated cost of new nuclear
power facilities for on-site storage to isolate such waste from the
environment for its hazardous life, which shall be defined as twenty
times the half-life of the radioactive substances in such waste;
(iv) the total cost of all past and any ongoing taxpayer and ratepayer
subsidies, including but not limited to, loans, grants and tax write-
offs or credits for existing nuclear power facilities in the state, and
the estimated projected costs of any such subsidies for new nuclear
power facilities;
(v) the estimated cost of decommissioning each of the existing nuclear
power facilities in the state and an analysis as to whether current
decommissioning trust funds will adequately cover such costs;
(vi) the estimated cost of fully remediating radioactive and toxic
contamination at each of the existing nuclear power facility sites in
accordance with the soil cleanup objective criteria pursuant to §27-1415
of the environmental conservation law;
(vii) if such sites are not fully remediated, the estimated cost of
the loss of use of land in perpetuity for each reactor site and the
negative impacts from such loss regionally on economic development,
agriculture, tourism, real estate and fisheries, any negative impacts to
the ecosystem of neighboring states;
(viii) the cost of emergency, resilience and protection programs from
extreme weather events, including flooding, at each of the existing
reactor sites over one thousand years, and such costs for nuclear power
facility sites for the same time period;
(ix) the socio-economic costs incurred by conditions, incidents or
accidents, including repairs, loss of jobs, health care, and relocation,
at existing and proposed nuclear power facilities;
(x) the potential liability and cost to the state from a range of
different plausible worst-case accidents, especially given design inade-
quacies, aging existing nuclear power facilities, escalating extreme
weather conditions, liability caps and possible legal action related to
harmful exposure to radioactive releases from nuclear power facilities;
(xi) evaluating the consistency with fiscal, environmental and energy
policy of classifying nuclear power facilities as a low-carbon or zero
emission technology, taking into account the full life cycle of nuclear
power facilities; and
(xii) the potential liability and cost to the state for remediation of
any nuclear and toxic contamination due to incomplete site remediation
at the existing nuclear power facilities;
A. 11433 5
(b) Examine, evaluate and assess the human health impacts of
constructing and operating new nuclear power facilities in the state,
including the mining of raw nuclear materials and the impact of such
mining on local populations near mining sites; the potential exposure of
residents living in proximity to nuclear facilities to known carcinogen-
ic, radioactive and toxic materials; the risk of human exposure to
nuclear waste materials, including the risks associated with transport-
ing such waste to remote locations; the risks of releasing radioactive
water into local water sources which may be used by other communities as
a source of drinking water; and the risks of explosions, meltdowns,
unintentional releases, and other accidents on local and remote popu-
lations;
(c) Examine, evaluate and assess the environmental impacts of operat-
ing new nuclear power facilities in the state, particularly the poten-
tial impacts on ecosystems, including habitat destruction, soil, ground
water, surface water and air contamination from radioactive and toxic
chemical emissions and releases, thermal pollution, impingement and
entrainment, and food web contamination;
(d) Examine, evaluate and assess the realistic time frame for the
construction of new nuclear power facilities, taking into consideration
the time required to construct new nuclear power facilities recently
completed elsewhere in the country;
(e) Examine, evaluate and assess the security risks of nuclear power
facilities, including but not limited to the impact of weakened federal
regulations, climate-related weather events, and potential terrorist
attacks using advanced technology;
(f) Examine, evaluate and assess the cost, environmental and health
impacts of alternative renewable energy sources and energy efficiencies,
including solar and wind power, geothermal energy and heat pumps, stor-
age and other energy-related measures that are affordable and environ-
mentally beneficial; and
(g) Examine, evaluate and assess the legal and liability risks to the
state from any pursuit of nuclear power facilities, including but not
limited to, the New York state energy research and development authori-
ty, the public service commission, the New York power authority and the
department of economic development. Such assessment shall include the
following analyses:
(i) whether it is the role of state government to promote and invest
in nuclear power facilities;
(ii) whether state law or the state constitution sanctions such
promotion and investment or designates this role to private industry;
(iii) whether the state's past promotion and pursuit of nuclear power
facilities resulted in negative environmental, public health, equity and
economic impacts;
(iv) whether nuclear power protects the ratepayer and is the most
affordable energy option available;
(v) how the state's development of nuclear power facilities may under-
mine the state's legal requirement to transition to safe affordable
renewable energy, energy efficiency and energy storage to meet the goals
of the New York state climate leadership and community protection act,
pursuant to chapter one hundred six of the laws of two thousand nine-
teen;
(vi) the consistency with environmental and energy policy of classify-
ing nuclear power facilities as a low-carbon technology, taking into
account the full life cycle of nuclear power facilities, routine and
A. 11433 6
accidental release of radioactive substances, and impact on communities,
including tribal nations; and
(vii) whether the state's development and/or investment in nuclear
power facilities creates an unacceptable liability risk, and whether
such investment creates a burden that reduces the government's ability
to respond to vital needs of the citizens of the state and unfairly
transfers costs and hazards to future generations.
3. To effectuate the purposes of this act, the task force may request
and shall receive from any state agency such assistance, information,
data, studies and analyses as will enable the task force to properly
carry out its powers and duties hereunder. All such agencies shall coop-
erate with and otherwise assist the task force in a timely manner.
4. The task force is authorized, subject to amounts made available by
appropriation by the legislature, to retain the services of organiza-
tions, contractors, consultants, universities, non-profits and other
entities as the task force may deem necessary to fulfill the assessment
obligations of this section.
5. The task force shall submit a draft report of its findings, conclu-
sions, recommendations and activities to the public, the governor and
the legislature no later than thirteen months after the effective date
of this act. After the submission of such draft report, the task force
shall hold no less than six public hearings throughout the state. Each
such hearing shall allow for a minimum of fifteen minutes for each
person testifying, a question-and-answer discussion of at least one
hour, and a public comment period of no less than one hundred twenty
days. No later than thirty months after the effective date of this act,
the task force shall submit a final report of its findings, conclusions,
recommendations, including any legislative proposals it deems necessary,
and activities to the public, the governor and the legislature.
§ 7. This act shall take effect immediately and shall expire and be
deemed repealed sixty days after transmission of the final report of the
task force to the public, the governor and the legislature, as provided
in section six of this act. Provided, however, that the president of the
New York state energy research and development authority shall notify
the legislative bill drafting commission upon the transmission of the
final report of the task force, as provided in section six of this act,
in order that the commission may maintain an accurate and timely effec-
tive data base of the official text of the laws of the state of New York
in furtherance of effectuating the provisions of section 44 of the
legislative law and section 70-b of the public officers law.