S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________
2210
2025-2026 Regular Sessions
I N A S S E M B L Y
January 15, 2025
___________
Introduced by M. of A. ROSENTHAL -- read once and referred to the
Committee on Codes
AN ACT to amend the criminal procedure law, in relation to out-of-state
investigations and warrants regarding legally protected health activ-
ity in New York state
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Section 705.10 of the criminal procedure law, as added by
chapter 744 of the laws of 1988, is amended to read as follows:
§ 705.10 Orders authorizing the use of a pen register or a trap and
trace device; when issuable.
1. An order authorizing the use of a pen register or a trap and trace
device may issue only:
[1.] (A) Upon an appropriate application made in conformity with this
article; and
[2.] (B) Upon a determination that an application sets forth specific,
articulable facts, warranting the applicant's reasonable suspicion that
a designated crime has been, is being, or is about to be committed and
demonstrating that the information likely to be obtained by use of a pen
register or trap and trace device is or will be relevant to an ongoing
criminal investigation of such designated crime.
2. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION IN THIS ARTICLE, NO COURT SHALL
ENTER AN EX PARTE ORDER AUTHORIZING THE INSTALLATION AND USE OF A PEN
REGISTER OR A TRAP AND TRACE DEVICE FOR THE PURPOSE OF INVESTIGATING OR
RECOVERING EVIDENCE OF A LEGALLY PROTECTED HEALTH ACTIVITY, AS DEFINED
IN SECTION 570.17 OF THIS ARTICLE.
§ 2. Section 700.15 of the criminal procedure law, as amended by chap-
ter 744 of the laws of 1988, is amended to read as follows:
§ 700.15 Eavesdropping and video surveillance warrants; when issuable.
1. An eavesdropping or video surveillance warrant may issue only:
EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD05519-01-5
A. 2210 2
[1.] (A) Upon an appropriate application made in conformity with this
article; and
[2.] (B) Upon probable cause to believe that a particularly described
person is committing, has committed, or is about to commit a particular
designated offense; and
[3.] (C) Upon probable cause to believe that particular communications
concerning such offense will be obtained through eavesdropping, or upon
probable cause to believe that particular observations concerning such
offense will be obtained through video surveillance; and
[4.] (D) Upon a showing that normal investigative procedures have been
tried and have failed, or reasonably appear to be unlikely to succeed if
tried, or to be too dangerous to employ; and
[5.] (E) Upon probable cause to believe that the facilities from
which, or the place where, the communications are to be intercepted or
the video surveillance is to be conducted, are being used, or are about
to be used, in connection with the commission of such offense, or are
leased to, listed in the name of, or commonly used by such person.
2. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION IN THIS ARTICLE, NO COURT SHALL
ENTER AN EX PARTE ORDER AUTHORIZING INTERCEPTION OF A TELEPHONIC COMMU-
NICATION OR ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS FOR THE PURPOSE OF INVESTIGATING
OR RECOVERING EVIDENCE OF A LEGALLY PROTECTED HEALTH ACTIVITY, AS
DEFINED IN SECTION 570.17 OF THIS ARTICLE.
§ 3. Section 690.40 of the criminal procedure law is amended by adding
a new subdivision 4 to read as follows:
4. NO WARRANT SHALL BE ISSUED UNDER THIS ARTICLE FOR ANY ITEM OR ITEMS
THAT PERTAIN TO AN INVESTIGATION INTO A LEGALLY PROTECTED HEALTH ACTIV-
ITY, AS DEFINED IN SECTION 570.17 OF THIS ARTICLE.
§ 4. The criminal procedure law is amended by adding a new section
690.60 to read as follows:
§ 690.60 SEARCH WARRANTS; CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS FOR CORPORATIONS.
1. A CORPORATION DOMICILED IN NEW YORK STATE, WHEN SERVED WITH A
WARRANT ISSUED BY ANOTHER STATE TO PRODUCE RECORDS SHALL NOT PRODUCE
SUCH RECORDS WHEN SUCH CORPORATION KNOWS OR SHOULD KNOW THAT SUCH
WARRANT RELATES TO AN INVESTIGATION INTO, OR ENFORCEMENT OF, A LEGALLY
PROTECTED HEALTH ACTIVITY, AS DEFINED IN SECTION 570.17 OF THIS ARTICLE.
2. (A) NO WARRANT ISSUED UPON A CORPORATION DOMICILED IN NEW YORK
STATE SHALL BE ENFORCEABLE UNLESS SUCH WARRANT INCLUDES, OR IS ACCOMPA-
NIED BY, AN ATTESTATION THAT THE EVIDENCE SOUGHT IS NOT RELATED TO AN
INVESTIGATION INTO, OR ENFORCEMENT OF, A LEGALLY PROTECTED HEALTH ACTIV-
ITY, AS DEFINED IN SECTION 570.17 OF THIS ARTICLE.
(B) A CORPORATION DOMICILED IN NEW YORK STATE THAT IS SERVED WITH A
WARRANT SHALL BE ENTITLED TO RELY ON THE REPRESENTATIONS MADE IN AN
ATTESTATION DESCRIBED IN PARAGRAPH (A) OF THIS SUBDIVISION IN DETERMIN-
ING WHETHER SUCH WARRANT RELATES TO AN INVESTIGATION INTO, OR ENFORCE-
MENT OF, A LEGALLY PROTECTED HEALTH ACTIVITY, AS DEFINED IN SECTION
570.17 OF THIS ARTICLE.
§ 5. This act shall take effect immediately.