(8) Communities most negatively impacted by artificial intelligence-
enabled technologies often have the least access to artificial intelli-
gence education.
(9) Artificial intelligence literacy initiatives must engage stake-
holders and communities in all stages and specific outreach efforts
should be made for communities disproportionately impacted by the
digital divide, including minority and rural communities.
(10) Jobs for the Future survey found 58% believe that learning oppor-
tunities around artificial intelligence should be offered to workers,
53% believe such opportunities should be available to learners, 54%
believe they would feel more prepared for the future impact of artifi-
cial intelligence if they were given learning tools for it.
(11) As of 2018, the U.S. artificial intelligence workforce stood at
about 14,000,000 workers or 9% of employment. Demand for artificial
intelligence occupations is projected to grow twice as fast as for all
occupations in the U.S.
(12) In 2021, black students made up only 7.5% of artificial intelli-
gence-related bachelor's degrees despite making up 14% of the popu-
lation. Women account for 60% of college graduates and only 40% of STEM
graduates and 25% of artificial intelligence graduates.
(13) The need for a strong workforce of artificial intelligence work-
ers, as well an artificial intelligence-literate population, requires
investment in artificial intelligence literacy education.
(14) Artificial intelligence literacy must also encompass ethical and
responsible use of emerging technologies. Preparing students from an
early age to critically engage with artificial intelligence is essential
for cultivating a digitally literate, civically informed, and work-
force-ready society.
(15) Public investment in early-stage artificial intelligence educa-
tion will expand access to opportunity, foster equity, and ensure New
York remains at the forefront of technological leadership.
§ 3. The education law is amended by adding a new section 115 to read
as follows:
§ 115. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE LITERACY IN THE DIGITAL EQUITY COMPET-
ITIVE GRANT PROGRAM. 1. DEFINITIONS. AS USED IN THIS SECTION, THE
FOLLOWING TERMS SHALL MEAN:
A. "ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM" OR "AI SYSTEM" MEANS A MACHINE-
BASED SYSTEM THAT, FOR EXPLICIT OR IMPLICIT OBJECTIVES, INFERS, FROM THE
INPUT IT RECEIVES, HOW TO GENERATE OUTPUTS SUCH AS PREDICTIONS, CONTENT,
RECOMMENDATIONS, OR DECISIONS THAT CAN INFLUENCE PHYSICAL OR VIRTUAL
ENVIRONMENTS. AI SYSTEMS VARY IN THEIR LEVELS OF AUTONOMY AND ADAPTIVE-
NESS AFTER DEPLOYMENT.
B. "ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE LITERACY" MEANS THE SKILLS ASSOCIATED WITH
THE ABILITY TO COMPREHEND THE BASIC PRINCIPLES, CONCEPTS, AND APPLICA-
TIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, AS WELL AS THE IMPLICATIONS, LIMITA-
TIONS AND ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL
INTELLIGENCE.
C. "COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION" MEANS NOT-FOR-PROFIT COMMUNITY ORGANIZA-
TIONS, OTHER THAN A SCHOOL, COMMUNITY COLLEGE OR INSTITUTION OF HIGHER
EDUCATION, WHICH OFFER FREE EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC.
D. "ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE LITERACY GRANT PROGRAM" OR "PROGRAM" MEANS
THE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE LITERACY DIGITAL EQUITY COMPETITIVE GRANT
PROGRAM ESTABLISHED UNDER SUBDIVISION TWO OF THIS SECTION.
E. "ACADEMIC INSTITUTION" MEANS ANY PUBLIC ELEMENTARY OR SECONDARY
SCHOOL, COMMUNITY COLLEGE, OR INSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION AUTHORIZED
TO OPERATE IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK AND RECOGNIZED BY THE NEW YORK STATE
A. 6874--A 3
EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OR THE BOARD OF REGENTS, WHICH PROVIDES FORMAL
INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAMS THAT CULMINATE IN A DIPLOMA, CERTIFICATE, OR
DEGREE.
F. "COMMUNITY COLLEGE" MEANS ANY INSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION WITH-
IN THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK OR CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK
SYSTEMS THAT IS AUTHORIZED TO CONFER ASSOCIATE DEGREES AND IS DEFINED AS
A COMMUNITY COLLEGE PURSUANT TO ARTICLE ONE HUNDRED TWENTY-SIX OF THIS
CHAPTER.
G. "INSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION" SHALL MEAN ANY POSTSECONDARY
EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION WITHIN THE STATE OF NEW YORK THAT IS AUTHORIZED
BY REGENTS OR THE DEPARTMENT TO CONFER BACHELOR'S, MASTER'S, DOCTORAL,
OR PROFESSIONAL DEGREES AND IS NOT DEFINED AS A COMMUNITY COLLEGE UNDER
THIS SECTION.
H. "PUBLIC ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOLS" SHALL INCLUDE CHARTER
SCHOOLS AUTHORIZED PURSUANT TO ARTICLE FIFTY-SIX OF THIS CHAPTER. FOR
THE PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, CHARTER SCHOOLS SHALL BE TREATED AS PUBLIC
SCHOOLS TO THE EXTENT THEY PROVIDE ELEMENTARY OR SECONDARY EDUCATION
CONSISTENT WITH THEIR CHARTER AND MEET THE ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS SET
FORTH BY THE COMMISSIONER.
2. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE LITERACY DIGITAL EQUITY COMPETITIVE GRANT
PROGRAM. A. THE COMMISSIONER SHALL ESTABLISH AN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
LITERACY DIGITAL EQUITY COMPETITIVE GRANT PROGRAM WHICH SHALL PROVIDE
GRANTS TO PUBLIC ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOLS, COMMUNITY COLLEGES,
INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION, AND COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS TO SUPPORT
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE LITERACY EFFORTS.
B. THE PROGRAM SHALL BE STRUCTURED AS A COMPETITIVE GRANT PROCESS. IN
AWARDING GRANTS, THE COMMISSIONER SHALL PRIORITIZE APPLICANTS THAT
DEMONSTRATE BOTH:
(I) HIGH LEVEL OF NEED, AS DETERMINED BY FACTORS INCLUDING, BUT NOT
LIMITED TO, LACK OF ACCESS TO COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION, A HIGH
PERCENTAGE OF STUDENTS OR COMMUNITY MEMBERS FROM LOW-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS,
LIMITED TECHNOLOGICAL INFRASTRUCTURE, OR GEOGRAPHIC BARRIERS TO DIGITAL
INCLUSION.
(II) A STRONG AND CLEARLY ARTICULATED PROPOSAL, INCLUDING SPECIFIC
GOALS, STRATEGIES, AND IMPLEMENTATION PLANS FOR EXPANDING ACCESS TO
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE LITERACY AND ADDRESSING EQUITY IN DIGITAL EDUCA-
TION.
C. ALL PROPOSALS SUBMITTED UNDER THIS SECTION SHALL INCLUDE:
(I) A DEMONSTRATION OF NEED, INCLUDING QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE
DATA DESCRIBING THE APPLICANT'S EXISTING ACCESS TO ARTIFICIAL INTELLI-
GENCE LITERACY RESOURCES AND TECHNOLOGICAL INFRASTRUCTURE.
(II) CLEARLY DEFINED AND MEASURABLE OBJECTIVES, INCLUDING THE ANTIC-
IPATED NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS REACHED IF THE GRANT IS FULLY IMPLEMENTED,
AND RELEVANT SUCCESS METRICS.
(III) A DETAILED PLAN OUTLINING HOW THE FUNDS WOULD BE USED IF THE
APPLICANT IS AWARDED THE FULL AMOUNT REQUESTED.
D. THE COMMISSIONER SHALL ALSO ESTABLISH CRITERIA FOR THE DEVELOPMENT
AND SUBMISSION OF GRANT APPLICATIONS AND PROPOSALS AND FOR THE SELECTION
OF RECIPIENTS OF GRANTS FROM THE PROGRAM. SUCH CRITERIA SHALL INCLUDE
PROVISIONS TO ENSURE GEOGRAPHIC DIVERSITY, DEMOGRAPHIC EQUITY, AND
ACCOUNTABILITY IN THE USE OF GRANT FUNDS.
E. TO ENSURE EQUITABLE DISTRIBUTION OF FUNDING, THE TOTAL AMOUNT
APPROPRIATED FOR THE PROGRAM SHALL BE ALLOCATED AS FOLLOWS:
(I) THIRTY PERCENT TO PUBLIC ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOLS.
(II) TWENTY PERCENT TO COMMUNITY COLLEGES.
(III) FIFTEEN PERCENT TO PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION.
A. 6874--A 4
(IV) FIVE PERCENT TO PRIVATE INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION.
(V) THIRTY PERCENT TO COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS.
F. SUCH PROGRAM SHALL PROVIDE GRANTS TO PUBLIC ELEMENTARY AND SECOND-
ARY SCHOOLS TO BE USED FOR:
(I) PROVIDING TEACHERS TRAINING AND CERTIFICATION TO SUPPORT ARTIFI-
CIAL INTELLIGENCE LITERACY EFFORTS IN SCHOOLS.
(II) FACILITATING ATTENDANCE OF TEACHERS AT PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT
COURSES, WORKSHOPS, AND CONFERENCES RELATED TO ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
EDUCATION, INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT RELATED TO ARTIFICIAL
INTELLIGENCE COURSE DESIGN AND FEE-BASED PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT.
(III) FOR SCHOOLS WITHOUT RESOURCES FOR COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION,
DEVELOPING AND DESIGNING BEST PRACTICES FOR COMPUTER SCIENCE MATERIALS
NEEDED FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE EDUCATION.
(IV) SUPPORTING PARTNERSHIPS WITH THE PRIVATE SECTOR TO FACILITATE
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE EDUCATION.
(V) EQUIPPING SCHOOLS WITH LABS TO PROVIDE STUDENTS HANDS-ON ARTIFI-
CIAL INTELLIGENCE LEARNING EXPERIENCES.
(VI) DEVELOPING VIRTUAL LEARNING PLATFORMS THAT FACILITATE REMOTE AND
INDIVIDUALIZED ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE EDUCATION OPPORTUNITIES.
(VII) DEVELOPING PROGRAMS THAT PREPARE STUDENTS FOR FURTHER STUDIES OR
FUTURE CAREERS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE OR RELATED FIELDS.
(VIII) PROVIDING FOUNDATIONAL ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE LITERACY
INSTRUCTION TAILORED TO GRADE LEVEL.
G. PROVIDE GRANTS TO COMMUNITY COLLEGES TO BE USED FOR ONE OR MORE OF
THE FOLLOWING:
(I) DEVELOPING AND IMPLEMENTING AN INTERDISCIPLINARY LITERACY PROGRAM
WITH RESPECT TO ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FOR NON-TRADITIONAL LEARNERS,
INCLUDING THROUGH PARTNERSHIPS WITH NON-PROFIT EDUCATIONAL ORGANIZA-
TIONS.
(II) DEVELOPING LABS TO PROVIDE STUDENTS HANDS-ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLI-
GENCE LEARNING EXPERIENCES.
(III) DEVELOPING VIRTUAL LEARNING PLATFORMS THAT FACILITATE REMOTE AND
INDIVIDUALIZED ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE EDUCATION OPPORTUNITIES.
H. PROVIDE GRANTS TO INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION TO BE USED FOR:
(I) DEVELOPING LABS TO PROVIDE STUDENTS HANDS-ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLI-
GENCE LEARNING EXPERIENCES.
(II) DEVELOPING VIRTUAL LEARNING PLATFORMS THAT FACILITATE REMOTE AND
INDIVIDUALIZED ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE EDUCATION OPPORTUNITIES.
(III) DEVELOPING PROGRAMMING AND PEDAGOGICAL TOOLS WITH RESPECT TO
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE EDUCATION AND INSTRUCTION FOR THE BENEFIT OF
ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOL TEACHERS AND COMMUNITY EDUCATORS.
(IV) DEVELOPING PROGRAMS THAT PREPARE PARTICIPANTS TO USE ARTIFICIAL
INTELLIGENCE TOOLS IN THE WORKPLACE, INCLUDING SECTOR-SPECIFIC APPLICA-
TIONS.
I. PROVIDE GRANTS TO COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS TO BE USED FOR ONE OR
MORE OF THE FOLLOWING:
(I) PROVIDING TRAINING AND CERTIFICATION WITH RESPECT TO ARTIFICIAL
INTELLIGENCE EDUCATION AND INSTRUCTION TO EMPLOYEES OF THE COMMUNITY
ORGANIZATIONS.
(II) DEVELOPING AND IMPLEMENTING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE LEARNING
EXPERIENCES AND EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMMING TO THE COMMUNITY SERVED BY THE
COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS.
(III) OFFERING PROGRAMMING TO SUPPORT ADULT LEARNERS AND JOBSEEKERS IN
UNDERSTANDING AND APPLYING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE WORKFORCE,
PARTICULARLY IN HIGH-GROWTH OR DIGITALLY TRANSFORMING INDUSTRIES.
A. 6874--A 5
J. REQUIRE ANY ENTITY WHICH IS AWARDED A GRANT UNDER THE PROGRAM TO
SUBMIT A REPORT TO THE COMMISSIONER ON OR BEFORE JULY FIRST OF EACH YEAR
FOR FOUR YEARS FOLLOWING THE GRANT BEING AWARDED WHICH SHALL INCLUDE,
BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO:
(I) THE NUMBER OF ADMINISTRATORS AND TEACHERS TRAINED OR SCHEDULED FOR
TRAINING.
(II) THE NUMBER OF SCHOOLS THAT HAVE IMPLEMENTED THIS PROGRAM ACROSS
THE STATE.
(III) THE NUMBER OF STUDENTS REACHED, AND AT WHICH GRADE LEVEL.
(IV) DISAGGREGATED DATA BASED ON RACE, ETHNICITY, COUNTY, AND SCHOOL.
(V) PROSPECTIVE TIMELINE TO REACH ALL SCHOOLS.
(VI) THE AMOUNT OF THE GRANT.
(VII) THE USE OF GRANT AMOUNTS.
(VIII) THE PROGRESS OF THE ENTITY TOWARDS FULFILLING THE OBJECTIVES
FOR WHICH THE GRANT WAS AWARDED.
3. METRICS AND EVALUATION. THE DEPARTMENT SHALL DEVELOP AND IMPLEMENT
A STANDARDIZED FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE ARTIFI-
CIAL INTELLIGENCE LITERACY GRANT PROGRAM. SUCH FRAMEWORK SHALL INCLUDE,
BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO:
A. MEASUREMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES RELATED TO ARTIFICIAL
INTELLIGENCE CONCEPTS, COMPETENCIES, AND DIGITAL FLUENCY.
B. PARTICIPATION RATES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE LITERACY PROGRAMS
DISAGGREGATED BY GRADE LEVEL, DEMOGRAPHIC GROUP, AND INSTITUTION TYPE.
C. EVALUATION OF HOW AND TO WHAT EXTENT ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE LITER-
ACY CONTENT HAS BEEN INTEGRATED INTO EXISTING SCHOOL CURRICULA OR COMMU-
NITY PROGRAMMING.
D. LONGITUDINAL TRACKING OF PARTICIPANTS' ENGAGEMENT WITH FURTHER
EDUCATION OR CAREER PATHWAYS RELATED TO ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY FIELDS.
4. GRANT ADMINISTRATION. A. THE COMMISSIONER SHALL AWARD GRANTS UNDER
THE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE LITERACY GRANT PROGRAM AND SHALL ADMINISTER
THE PROGRAM IN CONSULTATION WITH RELEVANT OFFICES WITHIN THE DEPARTMENT.
B. THE DEPARTMENT SHALL ESTABLISH PROCEDURES FOR THE APPLICATION,
REVIEW, APPROVAL, DISTRIBUTION, AND MONITORING OF GRANT AWARDS, INCLUD-
ING CLEAR GUIDANCE ON TIMELINES, ELIGIBILITY, DOCUMENTATION, AND
DISBURSEMENT.
C. THE COMMISSIONER SHALL ENSURE THAT ALL GRANT FUNDS ARE DISTRIBUTED
IN A TIMELY AND TRANSPARENT MANNER, WITH PRIORITY GIVEN TO ADVANCING
EDUCATIONAL EQUITY AND DIGITAL ACCESS IN UNDERSERVED COMMUNITIES.
D. THE DEPARTMENT SHALL PROVIDE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE TO APPLICANTS AND
GRANTEES TO SUPPORT STRONG PROPOSAL DEVELOPMENT, COMPLIANCE WITH PROGRAM
REQUIREMENTS, AND EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION.
E. THE DEPARTMENT SHALL HAVE AUTHORITY TO CONDUCT AUDITS, INSPECTIONS,
OR PROGRAM EVALUATIONS OF GRANTEES AND MAY RECAPTURE OR REALLOCATE FUNDS
NOT USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE GRANT.
F. ALL GRANTEES SHALL COMPLY WITH STATE REPORTING REQUIREMENTS AND
PARTICIPATE IN DEPARTMENT-LED EVALUATIONS AS A CONDITION OF RECEIVING
FUNDING.
5. REPORTS. ON OR BEFORE JANUARY FIRST NEXT SUCCEEDING THE EFFECTIVE
DATE OF THIS SECTION AND EACH JANUARY FIRST THEREAFTER, THE COMMISSIONER
SHALL SUBMIT A REPORT TO THE GOVERNOR, THE TEMPORARY PRESIDENT OF THE
SENATE, THE SPEAKER OF THE ASSEMBLY, AND THE CHAIRS OF THE SENATE AND
ASSEMBLY EDUCATION COMMITTEES AND HIGHER EDUCATION COMMITTEES WHICH
SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO:
A. 6874--A 6
A. SUMMARIZING AND ANALYZING THE REPORTS SUBMITTED TO THE COMMISSIONER
FOR THAT YEAR AND INFORMATION ON SUCH REPORTS REQUIRED UNDER PARAGRAPH J
OF SUBDIVISION TWO OF THIS SECTION;
B. SUMMARIZING THE METRICS ESTABLISHED UNDER SUBDIVISION THREE OF THIS
SECTION; AND
C. RECOMMENDING IMPROVEMENTS TO THE PROGRAM.
6. RULES AND REGULATIONS. THE COMMISSIONER SHALL HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO
ESTABLISH RULES AND REGULATIONS TO IMPLEMENT THE PROVISIONS OF THIS
SECTION.
§ 4. This act shall take effect one year after it shall have become a
law. Effective immediately, the addition, amendment and/or repeal of any
rule or regulation necessary for the implementation of this act on its
effective date are authorized to be made and completed on or before such
effective date.