S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________
6898
2025-2026 Regular Sessions
I N A S S E M B L Y
March 18, 2025
___________
Introduced by M. of A. WOERNER, HUNTER, K. BROWN, JONES, TAGUE, ANGELI-
NO, HAWLEY, NOVAKHOV, LUPARDO, LEVENBERG -- read once and referred to
the Committee on Codes
AN ACT to amend the executive law, in relation to requiring additional
notice prior to commencing an action in certain discrimination cases
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Subdivision 9 of section 297 of the executive law, as
amended by chapter 140 of the laws of 2022, is amended to read as
follows:
9. A. Any person claiming to be aggrieved by an unlawful discriminato-
ry practice shall have a cause of action in any court of appropriate
jurisdiction for damages, including, in cases of employment discrimi-
nation related to private employers and housing discrimination only,
punitive damages, and such other remedies as may be appropriate, includ-
ing any civil fines and penalties provided in subdivision four of this
section, unless such person had filed a complaint hereunder or with any
local commission on human rights, or with the superintendent pursuant to
the provisions of section two hundred ninety-six-a of this article,
provided that, where the division has dismissed such complaint on the
grounds of administrative convenience, on the grounds of untimeliness,
or on the grounds that the election of remedies is annulled, such person
shall maintain all rights to bring suit as if no complaint had been
filed with the division. At any time prior to a hearing before a hearing
examiner, a person who has a complaint pending at the division may
request that the division dismiss the complaint and annul [his or her]
THE election of remedies so that the human rights law claim may be
pursued in court, and the division may, upon such request, dismiss the
complaint on the grounds that such person's election of an administra-
tive remedy is annulled. Notwithstanding subdivision (a) of section two
hundred four of the civil practice law and rules, if a complaint is so
EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD00902-01-5
A. 6898 2
annulled by the division, upon the request of the party bringing such
complaint before the division, such party's rights to bring such cause
of action before a court of appropriate jurisdiction shall be limited by
the statute of limitations in effect in such court at the time the
complaint was initially filed with the division. Any party to a housing
discrimination complaint shall have the right within twenty days follow-
ing a determination of probable cause pursuant to subdivision two of
this section to elect to have an action commenced in a civil court, and
an attorney representing the division of human rights will be appointed
to present the complaint in court, or, with the consent of the division,
the case may be presented by complainant's attorney. A complaint filed
by the equal employment opportunity commission to comply with the
requirements of 42 USC 2000e-5(c) and 42 USC 12117(a) and 29 USC 633(b)
shall not constitute the filing of a complaint within the meaning of
this subdivision. No person who has initiated any action in a court of
competent jurisdiction or who has an action pending before any adminis-
trative agency under any other law of the state based upon an act which
would be an unlawful discriminatory practice under this article, may
file a complaint with respect to the same grievance under this section
or under section two hundred ninety-six-a of this article. In cases of
housing discrimination only, a person whose complaint has been dismissed
by the division after investigation for lack of jurisdiction or lack of
probable cause may file the same cause of action in a court of appropri-
ate jurisdiction pursuant to this section, unless judicial review of
such dismissal has been sought pursuant to section two hundred ninety-
eight of this article. The attorney general shall have the power to
commence an action or proceeding in the supreme court of the state of
New York, if, upon information or belief, the attorney general is of the
opinion that an employer has been, is, or is about to violate the
provisions regarding unlawful discriminatory retaliation pursuant to
subdivision seven of section two hundred ninety-six of this article.
Nothing in this section shall in any way limit rights or remedies which
are otherwise available under law to the attorney general or any other
person authorized to bring an action under this section.
B. NOTWITHSTANDING PARAGRAPH A OF THIS SUBDIVISION, PRIOR TO COMMENC-
ING AN ACTION IN ANY COURT OF COMPETENT JURISDICTION ALLEGING THAT THE
CONTENTS OF A WEBSITE OR MOBILE APPLICATION THAT DESCRIBES GOODS AND
SERVICES PROVIDED AT A PLACE OF PUBLIC ACCOMMODATION, RESORT OR AMUSE-
MENT CONSTITUTE AN UNLAWFUL DISCRIMINATORY PRACTICE WITH RESPECT TO
VISUALLY AND HEARING IMPAIRED INDIVIDUALS, THE CLAIMANT SHALL SERVE
WRITTEN NOTICE UPON THE OWNER OF SUCH PLACE OF PUBLIC ACCOMMODATION,
RESORT OR AMUSEMENT BY BOTH CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED AND
FIRST CLASS MAIL THAT (I) DESCRIBES EACH AND EVERY FEATURE OF SUCH
WEBSITE AND/OR MOBILE APPLICATION ALLEGED TO CONSTITUTE AN UNLAWFUL
DISCRIMINATORY PRACTICE AND (II) PROVIDES SUCH OWNER WITH AN OPPORTUNITY
TO CORRECT SUCH ALLEGED VIOLATION OR VIOLATIONS WITHIN SIXTY DAYS FROM
SERVICE OF SUCH NOTICE.
C. WITHIN THE SIXTY-DAY PERIOD OF TIME DESCRIBED IN PARAGRAPH B OF
THIS SUBDIVISION, THE OWNER OF A PLACE OF PUBLIC ACCOMMODATION, RESORT
OR AMUSEMENT MAY ADVISE THE CLAIMANT BY WRITTEN NOTICE BY BOTH CERTIFIED
MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED AND FIRST CLASS MAIL THAT THE ALLEGED
VIOLATION OR VIOLATIONS HAVE EITHER BEEN CORRECTED OR DID NOT OCCUR AND
DO NOT NEED CORRECTION.
§ 2. This act shall take effect immediately.