| Date of Action |
Assembly Actions -
Lowercase Senate Actions - UPPERCASE |
|---|---|
| May 13, 2026 |
referred to codes returned to assembly repassed senate |
| May 05, 2026 |
amended on third reading 1714a |
| May 05, 2026 |
vote reconsidered - restored to third reading returned to senate recalled from assembly |
| Apr 22, 2026 |
referred to health |
| Apr 21, 2026 |
delivered to assembly passed senate |
| Jan 29, 2026 |
advanced to third reading |
| Jan 28, 2026 |
2nd report cal. |
| Jan 27, 2026 |
1st report cal.169 |
| Jan 07, 2026 |
referred to health returned to senate died in assembly |
| Jun 06, 2025 |
ordered to third reading rules cal.413 substituted for a697 |
| Jan 13, 2026 |
amended on third reading 697a |
| Jan 07, 2026 |
ordered to third reading cal.27 |
| Jun 06, 2025 |
substituted by s1714 ordered to third reading rules cal.413 rules report cal.413 reported |
| May 28, 2025 |
reported referred to rules |
| May 19, 2025 |
reported referred to codes |
| Jan 08, 2025 |
referred to health |
-
-
Floor Vote: May 13, 2026
aye (44)- Addabbo Jr.
- Ashby
- Bailey
- Baskin
- Bottcher
- Brisport
- Brouk
- Bynoe
- Cleare
- Comrie
- Cooney
- Fahy
- Fernandez
- Gianaris
- Gonzalez
- Gounardes
- Harckham
- Hinchey
- Jackson
- Kavanagh
- Liu
- Martinez
- May
- Mayer
- Murray
- Myrie
- Palumbo
- Parker
- Persaud
- Ramos
- Rivera
- Rolison
- Ryan
- Salazar
- Sanders Jr.
- Scarcella-Spanton
- Sepúlveda
- Serrano
- Skoufis
- Stavisky
- Stewart-Cousins
- Sutton
- Webb
- Zellner
nay (16)absent (1)The following Member(s) participated via videoconferencing: Brouk
-
You should not include the term "hyperactive delirium" in this bill. The term “hyperactive delirium” is a medical diagnosis listed in DSM-V TR and the ICD-10. By including it in this bill you are not only infringing on free speech, but you will be making it illegal for a physician to use it in a report or to teach about it. First responders must be instructed on how to recognize and respond to the following: people with acute delirium (of any type), the potential risks of delirium, and how they need to treat the delirious individual as a medical rather than a criminal matter. While there exists the possibility that some law enforcement agents may use these terms in an attempt to “cover-up” a traumatic restraint death, this possibility does not outweigh the benefits of having first responders know how to recognize an acute delirium, regardless of its etiology, in order to attempt to carefully approach them and potentially save their lives. Simply canceling the term “excited delirium” is not going to eradicate this medical condition or the potential misuse of even the accepted medical terminology.