S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________
9152
2025-2026 Regular Sessions
I N A S S E M B L Y
October 17, 2025
___________
Introduced by M. of A. VANEL -- read once and referred to the Committee
on Consumer Affairs and Protection
AN ACT to amend the general business law, in relation to prohibiting
certain dynamic pricing practices
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Legislative findings and intent. The legislature hereby
finds and declares that new technology allows companies to automatically
change prices for essential goods and services in real time, using algo-
rithms that respond to local conditions like weather, demand, time of
day, and other factors. Research shows that these pricing systems can
push prices higher than what a fair, competitive market would normally
allow. Because these systems track consumer behavior and adjust prices
instantly, they can make it harder for people, especially low-income New
Yorkers, including SNAP recipients, to budget or shop around. As a
result, many vulnerable consumers may find themselves forced to pay
inflated prices simply because of the time that they decided to shop or
the neighborhood that they live in. Worse, seniors who rely on public
assistance transportation vehicles, like Access-a-Ride, will be unable
to shop around for better prices, those who take public transportation
will not have the ability to store their items in a vehicle while they
shop elsewhere, and persons in neighborhoods which have just one grocery
store will not have the ability to shop around for better prices.
This type of pricing also disrupts the traditional supply-and-demand
model that has long helped keep markets fair and predictable. In a heal-
thy market, prices generally reflect long-term changes in supply or
consumer demand and adjust gradually. But with real-time pricing, compa-
nies can artificially raise prices during short-term events. This manip-
ulation invariably breaks the natural balance between buyers and sellers
and shifts the power heavily toward companies and away from consumers.
The legislature finds that without oversight, companies that employ
EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD13841-02-5
A. 9152 2
dynamic pricing practices will erode affordability for New Yorkers who
already struggle to make ends meet and who do not have the ability to
shop for better prices elsewhere.
§ 2. The general business law is amended by adding a new section 396-
rrr to read as follows:
§ 396-RRR. CERTAIN DYNAMIC PRICING PRACTICES PROHIBITED. 1. AS USED IN
THIS SECTION, THE FOLLOWING TERMS SHALL HAVE THE FOLLOWING MEANINGS:
(A) "ESSENTIAL GOODS AND SERVICES" SHALL INCLUDE: (I) CONSUMER GOODS
AND SERVICES, BOUGHT OR RENDERED PRIMARILY FOR PERSONAL, FAMILY OR
HOUSEHOLD PURPOSES, (II) ESSENTIAL MEDICAL SUPPLIES AND SERVICES USED
FOR THE CARE, CURE MITIGATION, TREATMENT OR PREVENTION OF ANY ILLNESS OR
DISEASE, AND (III) ANY OTHER ESSENTIAL GOODS AND SERVICES USED TO
PROMOTE THE HEALTH OR WELFARE OF THE PUBLIC, PROVIDED THAT THIS DEFI-
NITION SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED TO INCLUDE SUCH GOODS AND SERVICES
DESCRIBED IN SUBDIVISION FIVE OF THIS SECTION. WHERE THERE IS ANY DOUBT
AS TO WHETHER A PRODUCT OR SERVICE FALLS WITHIN THIS DEFINITION, A COURT
SHALL USE THE DEFINITION PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH (D) OF SUBDIVISION TWO OF
SECTION THREE HUNDRED NINETY-SIX-R OF THIS ARTICLE TO MAKE SUCH A DETER-
MINATION.
(B) "SELLER" SHALL MEAN ANY SELLER OF ESSENTIAL GOODS OR SERVICES,
INCLUDING THIRD-PARTY PLATFORMS WHICH ENABLE DYNAMIC PRICING, WHICH
SELLS ESSENTIAL GOODS OR SERVICES TO CONSUMERS WITHIN THE STATE.
(C) "DYNAMIC PRICING" SHALL MEAN ANY AUTOMATED OR ALGORITHM-DRIVEN
PROCESS BY WHICH THE PRICE CHARGED FOR AN ESSENTIAL GOOD OR SERVICE IS
ADJUSTED ON A REAL-TIME BASIS SUBSTANTIALLY IN REFERENCE TO ANY NON-
COST-BASED FACTOR.
(D) "NON-COST-BASED FACTOR" SHALL MEAN ANY FACTOR USED TO SET THE
PRICE OF ESSENTIAL GOODS OR SERVICES THAT CANNOT REASONABLY BE REFER-
ENCED TO THE COST OF MANUFACTURING OR SELLING THE ESSENTIAL GOODS OR
SERVICES. A COURT IN DETERMINING WHETHER A FACTOR IS COST-BASED SHALL
CONSIDER THE CURRENT AND HISTORIC PROFITABILITY OF THE ESSENTIAL GOODS
OR SERVICES AND WHETHER SUCH PROFITABILITY INCREASED AS A RESULT OF THE
DYNAMIC PRICING.
(E) "SPECIALLY MANUFACTURED GOODS" SHALL MEAN GOODS THAT ARE TO BE
SPECIALLY MANUFACTURED FOR THE BUYER AND ARE NOT SUITABLE FOR SALE TO
OTHERS IN THE ORDINARY COURSE OF THE SELLER'S BUSINESS.
(F) "BONA FIDE CONTRACT" SHALL MEAN A GENUINE, ENFORCEABLE AGREEMENT
ENTERED INTO VOLUNTARILY AND EXPLICITLY AND IN GOOD FAITH BY PARTIES
WITH RELATIVELY EQUAL BARGAINING POWER, AFTER A MEANINGFUL NEGOTIATION
OF TERMS.
2. NO SELLER SHALL USE DYNAMIC PRICING TO SET PRICES FOR SUCH SELLER'S
ESSENTIAL GOODS AND SERVICES.
3. THIS PROHIBITION SHALL APPLY TO ALL PARTIES WITHIN THE CHAIN OF
DISTRIBUTION, INCLUDING ANY MANUFACTURER, SUPPLIER, WHOLESALER, DISTRIB-
UTOR OR RETAIL SELLER OF ESSENTIAL GOODS OR SERVICES OR BOTH SOLD BY ONE
PARTY TO ANOTHER WHEN THE PRODUCT SOLD WAS LOCATED IN THE STATE PRIOR TO
THE SALE.
4. A COURT'S DETERMINATION THAT A VIOLATION OF THIS SECTION HAS
OCCURRED SHALL BE BASED SOLELY ON THE FACT THAT A PRICE OF AN ESSENTIAL
GOOD OR SERVICE HAS BEEN DYNAMICALLY ADJUSTED, WHETHER OR NOT A CONSUMER
PAID FOR SUCH ESSENTIAL GOODS OR SERVICES.
5. THIS SECTION SHALL NOT APPLY TO:
(A) SPECIALLY MANUFACTURED GOODS;
(B) GOODS AND SERVICES FOR WHICH THE PRICE IS CALCULATED BY REFERENCE
TO THE AMOUNT OF LABOR, MATERIALS, OR WORK PERFORMED RATHER THAN BY A
STANDARDIZED PRICE;
A. 9152 3
(C) GOODS OR SERVICES PAID FOR AS PART OF AN AUCTION IN A COMPETITIVE
BIDDING PROCESS;
(D) GOODS OR SERVICES PAID FOR AS PART OF A BONA FIDE CONTRACT BETWEEN
TWO OR MORE PARTIES;
(E) FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE PRODUCTS;
(F) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES;
(G) INNKEEPERS AND COMMON CARRIERS; AND
(H) PRICES ADJUSTED DUE TO A BONA FIDE EMERGENCY.
6. WHERE A VIOLATION OF THIS SECTION IS ALLEGED TO HAVE OCCURRED, THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL MAY APPLY IN THE NAME OF THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW
YORK TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK WITHIN THE JUDICIAL
DISTRICT IN WHICH SUCH VIOLATION IS ALLEGED TO HAVE OCCURRED, ON NOTICE
OF FIVE DAYS, FOR AN ORDER ENJOINING OR RESTRAINING COMMISSION OR
CONTINUANCE OF THE ALLEGED UNLAWFUL ACT. IN ANY SUCH PROCEEDING, THE
COURT SHALL IMPOSE A CIVIL PENALTY IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED TWENTY-
FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS PER VIOLATION OR THREE TIMES THE GROSS RECEIPTS
FOR THE RELEVANT ESSENTIAL GOODS OR SERVICES, WHICHEVER IS GREATER AND,
WHERE APPROPRIATE, ORDER RESTITUTION TO AGGRIEVED PARTIES.
7. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL MAY PROMULGATE SUCH RULES AND REGULATIONS AS
ARE NECESSARY TO EFFECTUATE AND ENFORCE THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION.
§ 3. This act shall take effect on the ninetieth day after it shall
have become a law.