S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________
10185
I N S E N A T E
May 4, 2026
___________
Introduced by Sen. MAY -- read twice and ordered printed, and when
printed to be committed to the Committee on Local Government
AN ACT to authorize the town of Aurelius to continue the use of an
existing water district capital reserve fund
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Legislative findings. It is hereby found and determined
that the town of Aurelius, modified the manner in which the costs of
"Water District III" were apportioned from a special ad valorem assess-
ment upon properties benefited within the water district to a unit-based
tax levy upon an expanded "Water District III" in violation of the town
law. The specific actions taken by the town are more fully described as
follows:
On March 13, 2003, the town of Aurelius (the Town), New York, estab-
lished a capital reserve fund pursuant to section 6-c of the general
municipal law for the purpose of financing the reconstruction or major
repair of water lines serving "Water District III" within the town. From
2003 until on or about January 1, 2015, the costs associated with "Water
District III" and related improvements were financed and collected
through a special ad valorem assessment levied upon the properties bene-
fited within the water district. On June 14, 2012, the Town expanded the
water district through a joint or shared special improvement district
with the Village of Cayuga (the Village), and a bond resolution was duly
adopted authorizing the issuance of obligations to finance the Town
share of a joint water project. As a result of this expansion, the tax
base of the water district became larger than that of the former
district. On or about January 1, 2015, the Town modified the manner in
which the costs of the water district were apportioned by changing from
a special ad valorem assessment to a unit-based tax levy. At the time of
this modification, the Town acted under the mistaken belief that it was
authorized to change the assessment pursuant to former provisions of the
town law which had previously permitted such a change. After the Town's
action, however, it was determined that the statutory authority permit-
ting such a modification of the assessment basis had been repealed, and
EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD15658-01-6
S. 10185 2
that the Town therefore lacked legal authority for the change. In 2024,
the Town requested a formal opinion from the New York state comp-
troller's office regarding the permissible use of the water district
capital reserve fund. After extended review, the comptroller's office
was unable to provide guidance and recommended that the Town seek an act
of the legislature to address the issue.
§ 2. Unit-based tax levy validated. Notwithstanding the unauthorized
action taken by the town of Aurelius, county of Cayuga, in modifying the
manner in which the costs of the water district were apportioned, the
establishment of a unit-based tax levy described in section one of this
act is hereby legalized, validated, ratified, and confirmed.
§ 3. Authorization for the transfer of ad valorem tax revenues. The
town of Aurelius, upon resolution and permissive referendum, may trans-
fer any funds currently held from ad valorem tax collections by the
former "Water District III" reserve fund to "Water District III", and
such funds shall be used solely by "Water District III" for the purposes
which the funds were originally collected, including reconstruction or
major repairs, provided that the purposes for creating the former "Water
District III" reserve fund have been performed and any outstanding
claims arising from the purposes of the former "Water District III"
reserve fund have been paid from the funds.
§ 4. Severability. If any clause, sentence, subdivision, paragraph,
section or part of this act be adjudged by any court of competent juris-
diction to be invalid, judgment shall not affect, impair, or invalidate
the remainder thereof, but shall be confined in its operation to the
clause, sentence, subdivision, paragraph, section, or part thereof
directly involved in the controversy in which such judgment shall have
been rendered.
§ 5. This act shall take effect immediately.