LBD15911-01-6
S. 10473 2
TRAFFIC, EXCLUDING THE STRATEGIC FUNCTIONS SUCH AS TRIP SCHEDULING AND
SELECTION OF DESTINATIONS AND WAYPOINTS, AND INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITA-
TION: LATERAL VEHICLE MOTION CONTROL VIA STEERING, LONGITUDINAL MOTION
CONTROL VIA ACCELERATION AND DECELERATION, MONITORING THE DRIVING ENVI-
RONMENT VIA OBJECT AND EVENT DETECTION, RECOGNITION, CLASSIFICATION, AND
RESPONSE PREPARATION, OBJECT AND EVENT RESPONSE EXECUTION, MANEUVER
PLANNING; AND ENHANCING CONSPICUITY VIA LIGHTING, SIGNALING, AND GESTUR-
ING.
3. "DDT FALLBACK" SHALL MEAN THE RESPONSE BY THE PERSON OR HUMAN DRIV-
ER TO EITHER PERFORM THE DDT OR ACHIEVE A MINIMAL RISK CONDITION AFTER
OCCURRENCE OF A DDT PERFORMANCE-RELEVANT SYSTEM FAILURE OR FAILURES OR
UPON OPERATIONAL DESIGN DOMAIN EXIT, OR THE RESPONSE BY AN AUTOMATED
DRIVING SYSTEM TO ACHIEVE MINIMAL RISK CONDITION, GIVEN THE SAME CIRCUM-
STANCES.
4. "FULLY AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE" SHALL MEAN A MOTOR VEHICLE:
(A) WITH A MANUFACTURER'S GROSS VEHICLE WEIGHT RATING OF TEN THOUSAND
POUNDS OR LESS;
(B) EQUIPPED WITH AN AUTOMATED DRIVING SYSTEM DESIGNED TO FUNCTION
WITHOUT A HUMAN DRIVER AND WHERE LATERAL VEHICLE MOTION CONTROL VIA
STEERING, LONGITUDINAL MOTION CONTROL VIA ACCELERATION AND DECELERATION,
ARE AUTOMATICALLY CONTROLLED; AND
(C) EQUIPPED WITH TWO OR MORE DISTINCT SENSING MODALITIES THAT CAN
DETECT AND TRACK OBSTACLES IN THE EVENT OF FAILURE OF THE CAMERA SYSTEM
SO THAT THE AUTOMATED DRIVING SYSTEM CAN CONTINUE TO AVOID OBSTACLES
WHILE BRINGING THE VEHICLE TO A MINIMAL RISK CONDITION.
5. "HUMAN DRIVER" SHALL MEAN A NATURAL PERSON IN A MOTOR VEHICLE WITH
A VALID LICENSE TO OPERATE A MOTOR VEHICLE WHO CONTROLS ALL OR PART OF
THE DYNAMIC DRIVING TASK.
6. "MINIMAL RISK CONDITION" SHALL MEAN A CONDITION TO WHICH A PERSON,
HUMAN DRIVER, OR AN AUTOMATED DRIVING SYSTEM MAY BRING A MOTOR VEHICLE
AFTER PERFORMING THE DDT FALLBACK IN ORDER TO REDUCE THE RISK OF A CRASH
WHEN A GIVEN TRIP CANNOT OR SHOULD NOT BE COMPLETED.
7. "ON-DEMAND AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE NETWORK" SHALL MEAN A TNC, AS DEFINED
BY SECTION SIXTEEN HUNDRED NINETY-ONE OF THIS CHAPTER, THAT USES A SOFT-
WARE APPLICATION OR OTHER DIGITAL MEANS TO DISPATCH OR OTHERWISE ENABLE
THE PRE-ARRANGEMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WITH FULLY AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES FOR
PURPOSES OF TRANSPORTING PASSENGERS OR GOODS, INCLUDING FOR-HIRE TRANS-
PORTATION AND TRANSPORTATION OF PASSENGERS OR GOODS FOR COMPENSATION.
8. "OPERATIONAL DESIGN DOMAIN" SHALL MEAN OPERATING CONDITIONS UNDER
WHICH A GIVEN AUTOMATED DRIVING SYSTEM IS SPECIFICALLY DESIGNED TO FUNC-
TION, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ENVIRONMENTAL, GEOGRAPHICAL, AND
TIME-OF-DAY RESTRICTIONS, AND/OR THE REQUISITE PRESENCE OR ABSENCE OF
CERTAIN TRAFFIC OR ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS.
9. "PERSON" SHALL MEAN A NATURAL PERSON, CORPORATION, BUSINESS TRUST,
ESTATE, TRUST, PARTNERSHIP, LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, ASSOCIATION,
JOINT VENTURE, GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY, PUBLIC CORPORATION, OR ANY OTHER
LEGAL OR COMMERCIAL ENTITY.
10. "REQUEST TO INTERVENE" SHALL MEAN NOTIFICATION BY AN AUTOMATED
DRIVING SYSTEM TO A HUMAN DRIVER, DIRECTING SUCH HUMAN DRIVER TO PROMPT-
LY BEGIN OR RESUME PERFORMANCE OF PART OR ALL OF THE DYNAMIC DRIVING
TASK.
§ 2501. OPERATION OF FULLY AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES WITHOUT A HUMAN DRIVER.
1. A PERSON MAY OPERATE A FULLY AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE ON THE PUBLIC ROADS
IN THE COUNTIES OF ALBANY AND RENSSELAER WITHOUT A HUMAN DRIVER PROVIDED
THAT THE AUTOMATED DRIVING SYSTEM IS ENGAGED AND THE VEHICLE MEETS THE
FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
S. 10473 3
(A) IF A FAILURE OF THE AUTOMATED DRIVING SYSTEM OCCURS THAT RENDERS
SUCH SYSTEM UNABLE TO PERFORM THE ENTIRE DYNAMIC DRIVING TASK RELEVANT
TO ITS INTENDED OPERATIONAL DESIGN DOMAIN, THE FULLY AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE
SHALL ACHIEVE A MINIMAL RISK CONDITION;
(B) THE FULLY AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE IS CAPABLE OF OPERATING IN COMPLIANCE
WITH THE APPLICABLE TRAFFIC AND MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY LAWS AND REGU-
LATIONS OF THIS STATE WHEN REASONABLE TO DO SO, UNLESS AN EXEMPTION HAS
BEEN GRANTED BY THE DEPARTMENT; AND
(C) WHEN REQUIRED BY FEDERAL LAW, THE VEHICLE BEARS THE REQUIRED
MANUFACTURER'S CERTIFICATION LABEL INDICATING THAT AT THE TIME OF ITS
MANUFACTURE IT HAS BEEN CERTIFIED TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICA-
BLE FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARDS, INCLUDING REFERENCE TO ANY
EXEMPTION GRANTED BY THE NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION.
2. PRIOR TO OPERATING A FULLY AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE ON THE PUBLIC ROADS
IN THE COUNTIES OF ALBANY AND RENSSELAER WITHOUT A HUMAN DRIVER, A
PERSON SHALL SUBMIT A LAW ENFORCEMENT INTERACTION PLAN TO THE DEPARTMENT
WHICH SHALL DESCRIBE:
(A) THE MEANS OF COMMUNICATING WITH A FLEET SUPPORT SPECIALIST WHO IS
AVAILABLE DURING THE TIMES SUCH FULLY AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE IS IN OPERA-
TION;
(B) THE MEANS OF SAFELY REMOVING SUCH FULLY AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE FROM
THE ROADWAY AND STEPS TO SAFELY TOW SUCH FULLY AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE;
(C) THE MEANS TO RECOGNIZE WHETHER OR NOT SUCH AUTOMATED DRIVING
SYSTEM FOR SUCH FULLY AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE IS ENGAGED; AND
(D) ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION THE MANUFACTURER OR OWNER DEEMS NECES-
SARY REGARDING THE HAZARDOUS CONDITIONS OR PUBLIC SAFETY RISKS ASSOCI-
ATED WITH THE OPERATION OF SUCH FULLY AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE.
3. (A) THE OWNER OF A FULLY AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE OPERATING WITHOUT A
HUMAN DRIVER SHALL BE LIABLE FOR ANY VIOLATIONS OF APPLICABLE TRAFFIC
AND MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY LAWS AND REGULATIONS OF THIS STATE MADE BY SUCH
VEHICLE WHEN THE AUTOMATED DRIVING SYSTEM IS ENGAGED.
(B) (I) A NOTICE OF LIABILITY SHALL BE SENT BY FIRST CLASS MAIL TO
EACH OWNER ALLEGED TO BE LIABLE FOR A VIOLATION BY AN AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE
OPERATING WITHOUT A HUMAN DRIVER. PERSONAL DELIVERY ON THE OWNER SHALL
NOT BE REQUIRED. A MANUAL OR AUTOMATIC RECORD OF MAILING PREPARED IN THE
ORDINARY COURSE OF BUSINESS SHALL BE PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE OF THE FACTS
CONTAINED THEREIN.
(II) A NOTICE OF LIABILITY SHALL CONTAIN THE NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE
OWNER ALLEGED TO BE LIABLE FOR A VIOLATION BY AN AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE
OPERATING WITHOUT A HUMAN DRIVER, THE REGISTRATION NUMBER OF THE VEHICLE
INVOLVED IN SUCH VIOLATION, THE LOCATION WHERE SUCH VIOLATION TOOK
PLACE, THE DATE AND TIME OF SUCH VIOLATION AND THE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER
OF THE POLICE OFFICER WHO OBSERVED SUCH VIOLATION.
(III) THE NOTICE OF LIABILITY SHALL CONTAIN INFORMATION ADVISING THE
OWNER CHARGED OF THE MANNER AND THE TIME IN WHICH SUCH PERSON MAY
CONTEST THE LIABILITY ALLEGED IN THE NOTICE.
(IV) THE NOTICE OF LIABILITY SHALL BE PREPARED AND MAILED BY THE MUNI-
CIPALITY HAVING JURISDICTION OVER THE INTERSECTION WHERE THE VIOLATION
OCCURRED, OR BY ANY OTHER ENTITY AUTHORIZED BY SUCH MUNICIPALITY TO
PREPARE AND MAIL SUCH NOTIFICATION OF VIOLATION.
§ 2502. LICENSING. NOTWITHSTANDING THE PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE NINETEEN
OF THIS CHAPTER, WHEN AN AUTOMATED DRIVING SYSTEM INSTALLED ON A MOTOR
VEHICLE IS ENGAGED:
1. THE AUTOMATED DRIVING SYSTEM SHALL BE CONSIDERED THE DRIVER OR
OPERATOR, FOR THE PURPOSE OF ASSESSING COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE TRAF-
FIC OR MOTOR VEHICLE LAWS AND SHALL BE DEEMED TO SATISFY ELECTRONICALLY
S. 10473 4
ALL PHYSICAL ACTS REQUIRED BY A DRIVER OR OPERATOR OF SUCH MOTOR VEHI-
CLE; AND
2. THE AUTOMATED DRIVING SYSTEM SHALL BE CONSIDERED TO BE LICENSED TO
OPERATE SUCH MOTOR VEHICLE.
§ 2503. INSURANCE. BEFORE OPERATING A FULLY AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE ON
PUBLIC ROADS IN THIS STATE, A PERSON SHALL SUBMIT PROOF OF FINANCIAL
RESPONSIBILITY SATISFACTORY TO THE DEPARTMENT THAT SUCH FULLY AUTONOMOUS
VEHICLE IS COVERED BY INSURANCE OR PROOF OF SELF-INSURANCE THAT SATIS-
FIES THE REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE SIX OF THIS CHAPTER.
§ 2504. DUTIES FOLLOWING CRASHES INVOLVING FULLY AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES.
IN THE EVENT OF A CRASH INVOLVING A FULLY AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE:
1. SUCH FULLY AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE SHALL REMAIN ON THE SCENE OF SUCH
CRASH WHEN REQUIRED BY ARTICLE TWENTY-TWO OF THIS CHAPTER; AND
2. THE OWNER OF SUCH FULLY AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE, OR A PERSON ON BEHALF
OF SUCH FULLY AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE'S OWNER, SHALL PROMPTLY REPORT ANY
CRASHES OR COLLISIONS CONSISTENT WITH ARTICLE TWENTY-TWO OF THIS CHAP-
TER.
§ 2505. ON-DEMAND AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE NETWORK. AN ON-DEMAND AUTONOMOUS
VEHICLE NETWORK SHALL BE PERMITTED TO OPERATE PURSUANT TO STATE LAWS
GOVERNING THE OPERATION OF TRANSPORTATION NETWORK COMPANIES, AS DEFINED
BY SECTION SIXTEEN HUNDRED NINETY-ONE OF THIS CHAPTER, TAXIS, OR ANY
OTHER GROUND TRANSPORTATION FOR-HIRE OF PASSENGERS, WITH THE EXCEPTION
THAT ANY PROVISION OF ARTICLE FORTY-FOUR-B OF THIS CHAPTER THAT REASON-
ABLY APPLIES ONLY TO A HUMAN DRIVER SHALL NOT APPLY TO THE OPERATION OF
FULLY AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES WITH THE AUTOMATED DRIVING SYSTEM ENGAGED ON
AN ON-DEMAND AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE NETWORK.
§ 2506. REGISTRATION AND TITLE. 1. A FULLY AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE SHALL BE
PROPERLY REGISTERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE FOUR OF THIS CHAPTER AND
SUCH FULLY AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE SHALL BE IDENTIFIED ON THE REGISTRATION AS
A FULLY AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE.
2. A FULLY AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE SHALL BE PROPERLY TITLED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH ARTICLE FORTY-SIX OF THIS CHAPTER AND SUCH FULLY AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE
SHALL BE IDENTIFIED ON THE TITLE AS A FULLY AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE.
§ 2507. CONTROLLING AUTHORITY. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY LAW, RULE OR REGU-
LATION TO THE CONTRARY:
1. UNLESS OTHERWISE PROVIDED IN THIS CHAPTER AND NOTWITHSTANDING ANY
OTHER PROVISION OF LAW, FULLY AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES AND AUTOMATED DRIVING
SYSTEMS SHALL BE GOVERNED EXCLUSIVELY BY THIS ARTICLE. THE DEPARTMENT
SHALL BE THE SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE STATE AGENCY THAT MAY IMPLEMENT THE
PROVISIONS OF THIS ARTICLE;
2. FULLY AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES AND AUTOMATED DRIVING SYSTEMS OPERATING
PURSUANT TO THIS ARTICLE SHALL NOT BE SUBJECT TO SECTION TWELVE HUNDRED
TWENTY-SIX OF THIS CHAPTER; AND
3. NO STATE AGENCY, POLITICAL SUBDIVISION, MUNICIPALITY, OR LOCAL
ENTITY MAY ENACT OR KEEP IN FORCE RULES OR ORDINANCES THAT WOULD IMPOSE
TAXES, FEES, OR OTHER REQUIREMENTS INCLUDING PERFORMANCE STANDARDS,
SPECIFIC TO THE OPERATION OF FULLY AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES, AUTOMATED DRIV-
ING SYSTEMS, OR ON-DEMAND AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE NETWORKS IN ADDITION TO THE
REQUIREMENTS OF THIS ARTICLE.
§ 2508. OPERATION OF A MOTOR VEHICLE WITH AN AUTOMATED DRIVING SYSTEM
BY A HUMAN DRIVER. 1. A PERSON MAY OPERATE A MOTOR VEHICLE EQUIPPED WITH
AN AUTOMATED DRIVING SYSTEM CAPABLE OF PERFORMING THE ENTIRE DYNAMIC
DRIVING TASK IF:
(A) SUCH AUTOMATED DRIVING SYSTEM IS DESIGNED TO ISSUE A REQUEST TO
INTERVENE WHENEVER THE AUTOMATED DRIVING SYSTEM IS NOT CAPABLE OF
S. 10473 5
PERFORMING THE ENTIRE DYNAMIC DRIVING TASK WITH THE EXPECTATION THAT
SUCH PERSON WILL RESPOND APPROPRIATELY TO SUCH A REQUEST; AND
(B) THE AUTOMATED DRIVING SYSTEM IS CAPABLE OF BEING OPERATED IN
COMPLIANCE WITH TITLE SEVEN OF THIS CHAPTER WHEN REASONABLE TO DO SO
UNLESS AN EXEMPTION HAS BEEN GRANTED BY THE DEPARTMENT.
2. NOTHING IN THIS ARTICLE SHALL PROHIBIT OR RESTRICT A HUMAN DRIVER
FROM OPERATING A FULLY AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE EQUIPPED WITH CONTROLS THAT
ALLOW FOR SUCH HUMAN DRIVER TO CONTROL ALL OR PART OF THE DYNAMIC DRIV-
ING TASK.
§ 2. The vehicle and traffic law is amended by adding a new section
383-a to read as follows:
§ 383-A. EQUIPMENT REQUIRED FOR CERTAIN AUTOMATED MOTOR VEHICLES. 1.
FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, THE TERMS "FULLY AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE",
"AUTOMATED DRIVING SYSTEM", AND "HUMAN DRIVER" SHALL HAVE THE SAME MEAN-
INGS AS DEFINED BY SECTION TWENTY-FIVE HUNDRED OF THIS CHAPTER.
2. A FULLY AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE THAT IS DESIGNED TO BE OPERATED EXCLU-
SIVELY BY AN AUTOMATED DRIVING SYSTEM FOR ALL TRIPS SHALL NOT BE SUBJECT
TO MOTOR VEHICLE EQUIPMENT LAWS OR REGULATIONS OF THIS STATE WHICH (A)
RELATE TO OR SUPPORT MOTOR VEHICLE OPERATION BY A HUMAN DRIVER; AND (B)
ARE NOT RELEVANT FOR AN AUTOMATED DRIVING SYSTEM.
§ 3. The vehicle and traffic law is amended by adding a new section
301-c to read as follows:
§ 301-C. INSPECTION CRITERIA FOR FULLY AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES. SECTION
THREE HUNDRED ONE OF THIS ARTICLE AND ANY REGULATIONS PROMULGATED BY THE
COMMISSIONER THEREWITH SHALL ONLY APPLY TO A FULLY AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE,
AS DEFINED BY SECTION TWENTY-FIVE HUNDRED OF THIS CHAPTER, IN A MANNER
CONSISTENT WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION THREE HUNDRED EIGHTY-THREE-A
OF THIS TITLE.
§ 4. This act shall take effect immediately and shall expire July 1,
2028 when upon such date the provisions of this act shall be deemed
repealed.