S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________
10574
I N S E N A T E
May 26, 2026
___________
Introduced by Sen. SANDERS -- read twice and ordered printed, and when
printed to be committed to the Committee on Codes
AN ACT to amend the executive law, in relation to the regulation of the
use of artificial intelligence and facial recognition technology in
criminal investigations
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Legislative intent. Artificial intelligence tools like
Cybercheck and facial recognition technologies have been used extensive-
ly in criminal investigations across the U.S., including nearly 8,000
cases in 40 states. However, their use has raised significant legal
challenges due to the lack of transparency in their methodologies and
concerns over accuracy and reliability. Defense attorneys have success-
fully argued in several cases that AI-generated evidence should be
excluded from court proceedings due to these issues. This act aims to
address these concerns by prohibiting the use of AI outputs, including
facial recognition, as evidence while allowing their use for investi-
gative purposes, thereby protecting the rights of defendants and main-
taining the integrity of the judicial process.
§ 2. Section 837 of the executive law is amended by adding a new
subdivision 25 to read as follows:
25. (A) PROMULGATE A WRITTEN PROTOCOL TO STANDARDIZE AND DETAIL FOR
LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES THAT UTILIZE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE
INVESTIGATION OF CRIMINAL ACTIVITY. THE PROTOCOL SHALL ADDRESS THE
FOLLOWING TOPICS:
(I) AI SYSTEMS AND FRT BEING USED FOR INVESTIGATIVE PURPOSES, INCLUD-
ING BUT NOT LIMITED TO DATA ANALYSIS, PATTERN RECOGNITION, FACIAL RECOG-
NITION, AND PREDICTIVE ANALYTICS;
(II) AI SYSTEMS AND FRT USED TO ASSIST IN IDENTIFYING POTENTIAL
SUSPECTS, UNCOVERING EVIDENCE, AND GENERATING INVESTIGATIVE LEADS;
(III) REQUIRING LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES THAT UTILIZE AI SYSTEMS AND
FRT TO IMPLEMENT TRANSPARENCY MEASURES, INCLUDING MAINTAINING RECORDS OF
AI-GENERATED OUTPUTS AND THE PARAMETERS USED BY THE AI SYSTEM. SUCH
RECORDS SHALL BE SUBJECT TO AUDIT AND REVIEW BY AN INDEPENDENT OVERSIGHT
EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD11032-05-6
S. 10574 2
BODY DESIGNATED BY THE DEPARTMENT TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE PROTO-
COL;
(IV) REQUIRING LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES THAT UTILIZE AI SYSTEMS AND
FRT TO UNDERGO REGULAR INDEPENDENT AUDITS OF FRT SYSTEMS TO ASSESS THEIR
ACCURACY AND BIASES. THE RESULTS OF THESE AUDITS SHALL BE PUBLICLY
ACCESSIBLE AND DISCLOSED IN ANY CASE WHERE FRT EVIDENCE IS USED; AND
(V) REQUIRING LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS THAT UTILIZE AI SYSTEMS AND FRT
RECEIVE THOROUGH TRAINING ON THE LIMITATIONS AND PROPER USE OF AI
SYSTEMS AND FRT, EMPHASIZING THE IMPORTANCE OF UNDERSTANDING AND MITI-
GATING BIASES AND ERRORS.
(B) FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SUBDIVISION:
(I) "ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE" OR "AI" MEANS A MACHINE-BASED SYSTEM
THAT CAN, FOR A GIVEN SET OF HUMAN-DEFINED OBJECTIVES, MAKE PREDICTIONS,
RECOMMENDATIONS, OR DECISIONS INFLUENCING REAL OR VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS,
AND THAT USES MACHINE- AND HUMAN-BASED INPUTS TO PERCEIVE REAL AND
VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS, ABSTRACT SUCH PERCEPTIONS INTO MODELS THROUGH
ANALYSIS IN AN AUTOMATED MANNER, AND USE MODEL INFERENCE TO FORMULATE
OPTIONS FOR INFORMATION OR ACTION;
(II) "AI-GENERATED OUTPUT" MEANS ANY INFORMATION, ANALYSIS, OR DECI-
SION PRODUCED BY AN AI SYSTEM DURING A CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION, INCLUDING
BUT NOT LIMITED TO FACIAL RECOGNITION, PREDICTIVE POLICING MODELS, AND
OTHER MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHMS; AND
(III) "FACIAL RECOGNITION TECHNOLOGY" OR "FRT" MEANS A TECHNOLOGY THAT
ANALYZES FACIAL FEATURES AND IS CAPABLE OF IDENTIFYING OR VERIFYING A
PERSON FROM A DIGITAL IMAGE OR A VIDEO FRAME FROM A VIDEO SOURCE.
§ 3. This act shall take effect on the ninetieth day after it shall
have become a law.