Do you support this bill?

Senate Bill S10688

2025-2026 Legislative Session

Opts the state out of certain provisions of the Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980, Public Law 96-221

download bill text pdf

Sponsored By

Current Bill Status - In Senate Committee Rules Committee

Please enter your contact information

Home address is used to determine the senate district in which you reside. Your support or opposition to this bill is then shared immediately with the senator who represents you.

Optional services from the NY State Senate:

Create an account. An account allows you to officially support or oppose key legislation, sign petitions with a single click, and follow issues, committees, and bills that matter to you. When you create an account, you agree to this platform's terms of participation.

Include a custom message for your Senator? (Optional)

Enter a message to your senator. Many New Yorkers use this to share the reasoning behind their support or opposition to the bill. Others might share a personal anecdote about how the bill would affect them or people they care about.

Actions

2025-S10688 (ACTIVE) - Details

Current Committee:
Senate Rules
Law Section:
Banking Law
Laws Affected:
Amd §14-a, Bank L; add Art 11 §§1101 - 1104, Fin Serv L

2025-S10688 (ACTIVE) - Summary

Opts the state out of certain provisions of the Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980, Public Law 96-221; establishes applicable interest limitations.

2025-S10688 (ACTIVE) - Bill Text download pdf

                             
                     S T A T E   O F   N E W   Y O R K
 ________________________________________________________________________
 
                                   10688
 
                             I N  S E N A T E
 
                              August 26, 2026
                                ___________
 
 Introduced  by  Sen.  MYRIE  -- read twice and ordered printed, and when
   printed to be committed to the Committee on Rules
 
 AN ACT to amend the banking law  and  the  financial  services  law,  in
   relation  to opting the state out of certain provisions of the Deposi-
   tory Institutions Deregulation  and  Monetary  Control  Act  of  1980,
   Public Law 96-221

   THE  PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
 BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
 
   Section 1. Legislative findings. The regulation of interest and  usury
 is among the oldest exercises of the states' police powers. New York, in
 its  exercise  of  that police power, has a substantial and longstanding
 interest in protecting its residents, its communities, and  its  economy
 from  excessive  interest  and  evasions of its lending laws. Before the
 Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control  Act  of  1980
 (DIDMCA)  codified federal rate exportation, the law governing an inter-
 state consumer-usury dispute generally favored the jurisdiction in which
 the consumer resided, entered  the  transaction,  received  credit,  and
 incurred  the  debt. After DIDMCA, that balance shifted, and in addition
 to national banks  benefitting  from  rate  exportation,  sections  five
 hundred  twenty-one  through  five  hundred  twenty-three  of the DIDMCA
 extended specified federal interest-rate  authority  to  certain  state-
 chartered  institutions.  Section  five hundred twenty-five of that act,
 however, expressly permits a state to provide that it does not want such
 provisions to apply with respect to loans made in that state. The legis-
 lature finds that in pursuit of its longstanding police power  to  regu-
 late  interest and usury in this state, New York elects to not have such
 provisions apply to consumer credit transactions,  including  loans,  in
 this  state.  Further,  Congress  used  different geographic language in
 sections five hundred twenty-one and five hundred  twenty-five.  Section
 five  hundred  twenty-one refers to the state where the bank is located;
 section five hundred twenty-five  refers  to  loans  made  in  a  state.
 Accordingly,  the  legislature finds that the location of an institution
 and the place where a transaction is made are distinct inquiries. Relat-
 edly, the United States Court of Appeals  for  the  Second  Circuit  has
 
  EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                       [ ] is old law to be omitted.
              

Comments

Open Legislation is a forum for New York State legislation. All comments are subject to review and community moderation is encouraged.

Comments deemed off-topic, commercial, campaign-related, self-promotional; or that contain profanity, hate or toxic speech; or that link to sites outside of the nysenate.gov domain are not permitted, and will not be published. Attempts to intimidate and silence contributors or deliberately deceive the public, including excessive or extraneous posting/posts, or coordinated activity, are prohibited and may result in the temporary or permanent banning of the user. Comment moderation is generally performed Monday through Friday. By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and verify you are over 13.

Create an account. An account allows you to sign petitions with a single click, officially support or oppose key legislation, and follow issues, committees, and bills that matter to you. When you create an account, you agree to this platform's terms of participation.